pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05305 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.IM

Recognition: no theorem link

Scientific Validation of the SPARC4 Pipeline: Multi-band Imaging, Polarimetry, and Photometric Time Series for Improved Characterization of Transiting Exoplanets

Eder Martioli , Claudia V. Rodrigues , Julio C. N. Campagnolo , Francisco J. Jablonski , Ana Carolina Mattiuci , Fernando Falkenberg , Gustavo H. S. Santos , Marina M. C. Mello
show 9 more authors
Isabel J. Lima Filipe V. M. Monteiro Luciano Fraga Leandro de Almeida Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira H\'elio D. Perottoni Laerte Andrade Wagner Schlindwein Denis Bernardes
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM
keywords SPARC4exoplanet transitsphotometrypolarimetrydata pipelineTESSBayesian MCMChot Jupiters
0
0 comments X

The pith

SPARC4 pipeline delivers 0.02% photometric precision on exoplanet transits and refines parameters via joint TESS modeling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the SPARC4 Pipeline, a set of data reduction routines for photometric and polarimetric observations taken with the SPARC4 instrument on a 1.6 m telescope. It shows that the pipeline produces calibrated images with sub-arcsecond astrometry and time series that reach an average photometric precision of 0.02% at 15-minute cadence across seven transit events. Polarimetric standard-star measurements confirm instrumental polarization below 0.06% and linear polarization accuracy of 0.2%. When the ground-based light curves are modeled jointly with TESS or K2 data inside a Bayesian MCMC framework, the combined analysis yields tighter values for orbital periods, planetary radii, and other physical parameters of the host stars and planets.

Core claim

The SPARC4 Pipeline processes high-cadence multi-band imaging and polarimetry to generate time series that achieve 0.02% photometric precision for a 15-minute cadence and 0.02% polarimetric precision over hours-long observations; joint Bayesian MCMC modeling of these light curves with TESS (or K2) data then produces refined constraints on the orbital periods and radii of the observed hot Jupiters.

What carries the argument

The SPARC4 Pipeline, a suite of routines that calibrates images, extracts time series, and feeds them into Bayesian MCMC joint modeling with space-based photometry.

If this is right

  • Orbital periods and planetary radii for the observed hot Jupiters can be determined more accurately than with either dataset alone.
  • Multi-band and polarimetric time series become practical for ground-based characterization of transiting planets with host stars of V = 10 to 14.
  • The same reduction steps can be applied to other exoplanet systems observed with SPARC4 to produce comparable photometric and polarimetric time series.
  • Instrumental polarization remains below 0.06%, enabling reliable linear polarization measurements at the 0.2% level for future programs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The demonstrated precision level suggests SPARC4 could contribute to ground-based follow-up of TESS discoveries that require multi-band or polarimetric information.
  • Joint modeling approaches of this type may become standard for combining ground-based high-cadence data with space photometry to reduce parameter degeneracies.
  • If the pipeline performance holds across a wider range of targets and conditions, similar instrument-specific pipelines could be developed for other small telescopes.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline fully removes instrumental systematics and the seven chosen transits plus standard-star observations are representative enough to support the quoted precision and improved parameter constraints.

What would settle it

A new transit observation of one of the same systems with an independent high-precision instrument that yields a planetary radius differing by more than the reported uncertainty from the joint SPARC4-plus-TESS value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05305 by Ana Carolina Mattiuci, Claudia V. Rodrigues, Denis Bernardes, Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira, Eder Martioli, Fernando Falkenberg, Filipe V. M. Monteiro, Francisco J. Jablonski, Gustavo H. S. Santos, H\'elio D. Perottoni, Isabel J. Lima, Julio C. N. Campagnolo, Laerte Andrade, Leandro de Almeida, Luciano Fraga, Marina M. C. Mello, Wagner Schlindwein.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Stacked images of the fields of HATS-24 (a) and WASP-78 (b) observed with SPARC4 in PHOT and POLAR modes, respectively, both in channel 1 (g band). Red circles indicate the Gaia DR3 catalog coordinates, transformed into pixel coordinates using the WCS solution calculated by the pipeline. The crosses represent the source positions detected by the pipeline. The panels in the bottom and right-hand side displa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distributions of ∆α cos δ (left) and ∆δ (right) for the g band. The quantities ∆α and ∆δ represent the differences between the RA and Dec coordinates derived by the pipeline and those from the Gaia DR3 catalog, computed from all sources detected in the stacked images obtained dur￾ing the eight nights of observations presented in this work. The dotted lines and values in the legends indicate the stan￾dard d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between the linear polarization measured by the SPARC4 Pipeline in the g, r, i, and z bands and literature values in the B, V , R, and I bands for the polarized standard stars Hilt 715 and Hilt 652 (Fossati et al. 2007; Cikota et al. 2017). The plots also show the least-squares fits of the Serkowski law to the literature data, with the posterior distributions of the fit parameters displayed in t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Four-band SPARC4 differential photometry time series of the transits of the exoplanets HATS-23 b, HATS-24 b, HATS-21 b, and HATS-9 b. Each panel show the observed light curve data with best-fit transit models (black lines) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Four-band SPARC4 differential photometry (top panels) and polarimetric time series (bottom panels) for the transits of the exoplanets WASP-78 b (left), WASP-123 b (middle), and WASP-111 b (right). The top panels present the observed light curves together with the best-fit transit models (black lines). The bottom panels show the corresponding total polarization using the same color scheme as in the photomet… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Photometric precision of SPARC4 differential light-curve residuals. The top panel shows the precision as a function of target V magnitude, computed from the mean standard deviation of residuals in 15-minute bins. The bottom panels show the precision as a function of bin size for all targets and channels in PHOT (left) and POLAR (right) modes. Dashed lines show the expected binning improvement, ⟨σ0⟩/ √ ∆t, … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flux modulation as a function of waveplate po￾sition for the g-band SPARC4 data from three transits ob￾served in POLAR L2 mode. Points of the same color corre￾spond to the same 16-position polarimetric sequence, while black points with error bars indicate the median and median absolute deviation at each waveplate position. APPENDIX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Flux modulation as a function of waveplate position for the four-band SPARC4 observations of the WASP-123 b transit in POLAR L2 mode. Points of the same color correspond to the same 16-position polarimetric sequence; black points with error bars show the median and median absolute deviation at each position. Left panels use a global flat-field (combining flats from all waveplate posi￾tions), while right pa… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Air mass of observations as a function of OPD local time (UT - 3h). Crosses represent observations in POLAR mode, and circles represent observations in PHOT mode. The dates of the observations are indicated in the legend [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Pairs plot showing the MCMC samples and posterior distributions of the coefficients obtained in PHOT mode on the night of 20240617, from the time series of the HATS-9 field. The contours mark the 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ regions of the distribution. The blue crosses indicate the best-fit values for each parameter obtained by the mode, and the dashed vertical lines in the projected distributions show the median valu… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Photometric accuracy of SPARC4 absolute photometry calibrated using the master calibration (see text and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Linear polarization of the polarized standard star Hilt 652 measured in the four SPARC4 channels. Model-fit parameters and measurement details are given in each panel header [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Linear polarization of the polarized standard star Hilt 715 measured in the four SPARC4 channels. Model-fit parameters and measurement details are given in each panel header [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Linear polarization of the unpolarized standard star HD 13588 measured in the four SPARC4 channels. Model-fit parameters and measurement details are given in each panel header. REFERENCES Adibekyan, V., Dorn, C., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2021, Science, 374, 330, doi: 10.1126/science.abg8794 Anderson, D. R., Brown, D. J. A., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.3449, doi: 10.48550/arXiv… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: TESS (or K2) light curves of the seven exoplanet transits analyzed in this work. Light blue points show the photometric data around the transits, dark blue points show binned data (bin size 0.002 d), and red lines indicate the best-fit joint SPARC4 + TESS (or K2) transit models. Times are relative to the transit midpoint [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Four-band SPARC4 differential photometry time series of the transit of the exoplanet WASP-78 b. Grey points show the observed light curve data, solid black points show binned data (bin size 0.002 d), orange shaded regions show a Gaussian Process interpolation to the binned data, and the green line show the best-fit transit model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_24.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-cadence multi-band imaging and polarimetry have important scientific applications in astronomy. Observations of transits of exoplanets are a particular application that requires robust data reduction and analysis. We present the SPARC4 Pipeline, a suite of routines developed to process photometric and polarimetric data obtained with the instrument SPARC4 installed on the 1.6 m telescope at Pico dos Dias Observatory, Brazil. The scientific data products, up to the generation of high-cadence time series, are demonstrated using observations of several transiting exoplanetary systems in both photometric and polarimetric modes. These observations are used to produce stacked calibrated images, yielding sub-arcsecond astrometric accuracy even in sparse fields. The time series of these fields enabled a photometric characterization of the instrument. Observations of polarimetric standard stars yield an instrumental polarization below 0.06% and a linear polarization accuracy of 0.2%. Furthermore, transit observations of seven exoplanets with host-star magnitudes in the range 10.2 < V < 13.9 demonstrate that SPARC4 achieves an average photometric precision of 0.02% for a 15-minute cadence and a polarimetric precision of ~0.02% over hours-long time series. Finally, we jointly model the SPARC4 light curves together with TESS data (or K2 data in the case of HATS-9) using a Bayesian MCMC framework to refine constraints on the physical parameters of the exoplanets, enabling a more accurate determination of orbital periods and planetary radii, and providing improved constraints on the orbital and physical parameters of these hot Jupiters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the SPARC4 Pipeline for reducing multi-band imaging and polarimetric data acquired with the SPARC4 instrument on the 1.6 m telescope at Pico dos Dias Observatory. It validates the pipeline through observations of polarimetric standard stars (yielding instrumental polarization below 0.06% and linear polarization accuracy of 0.2%) and seven transiting exoplanets (host magnitudes 10.2 < V < 13.9), reporting an average photometric precision of 0.02% at 15-minute cadence and polarimetric precision of ~0.02% over hours-long time series. The work further demonstrates that joint Bayesian MCMC modeling of the SPARC4 light curves with TESS (or K2) photometry refines constraints on orbital periods, planetary radii, and other physical parameters of the hot Jupiters.

Significance. If the reported precisions and improvements hold, the paper is significant for delivering a validated, publicly usable pipeline that enables competitive ground-based high-cadence photometry and polarimetry, directly supporting exoplanet characterization. The joint-modeling results illustrate a practical route for combining ground-based multi-band data with space photometry to tighten parameter posteriors. The manuscript addresses the representativeness concern by supplying per-target light-curve figures, residual-noise analysis, and before/after parameter tables, so the weakest assumption in the stress-test note does not materialize as a load-bearing gap.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'sub-arcsecond astrometric accuracy' is stated without a quantitative example or table entry; adding a short table or sentence with measured RMS values across the seven fields would strengthen the claim.
  2. Results section: the 15-minute cadence used for the 0.02% photometric precision metric should be defined explicitly (e.g., bin size, number of points per bin) to allow direct comparison with other instruments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the SPARC4 pipeline manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper validates the SPARC4 pipeline through direct empirical measurements of instrumental polarization and photometric precision on standard stars and seven transit observations, then applies standard Bayesian MCMC joint modeling with independent external TESS/K2 datasets. No load-bearing equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains reduce the reported precisions or refined exoplanet parameters to quantities defined solely by the authors' own inputs or prior assumptions. The central claims rest on observable data products and external benchmarks without self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard astronomical data-reduction assumptions and transit-modeling priors rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in exoplanet transit modeling hold, including appropriate limb-darkening laws and negligible unmodeled stellar activity in the chosen targets.
    Invoked when jointly fitting SPARC4 and TESS/K2 light curves to refine planetary parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1487 out tokens · 79906 ms · 2026-05-10T19:55:20.160381+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Science , keywords =

    Adibekyan, V., Dorn, C., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2021, Science, 374, 330, doi: 10.1126/science.abg8794

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abg8794 2021

  2. [2]

    R., Brown, D

    Anderson, D. R., Brown, D. J. A., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1410.3449, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1410.3449 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.3449 2014

  3. [3]

    D., et al

    Bento, J., Schmidt, B., Hartman, J. D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 835, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx500

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx500 2017

  4. [4]

    2025, PhD thesis, Brazilian National Institute for Space Research

    Bernardes, D. 2025, PhD thesis, Brazilian National Institute for Space Research

    2025

  5. [5]

    V., Rodrigues, F., et al

    Bernardes, D., Junior, O. V., Rodrigues, F., et al. 2025, PASP, 137, 035003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ada187

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ada187 2025

  6. [6]

    B., & Sanchez, B

    Beroiz, M., Cabral, J. B., & Sanchez, B. 2020, Astronomy and Computing, 32, 100384, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100384

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100384 2020

  7. [7]

    ´A., Hartman, J

    Bhatti, W., Bakos, G. ´A., Hartman, J. D., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1607.00322, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1607.00322

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.00322 2016

  8. [8]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    Bradley, L., Sip˝ ocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2, 2.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13989456

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13989456 2024

  9. [9]

    D., et al

    Brahm, R., Jord´ an, A., Hartman, J. D., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/33

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/33 2015

  10. [10]

    R., & Greisen, E

    Calabretta, M. R., & Greisen, E. W. 2002, A&A, 395, 1077, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021327

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021327 2002

  11. [11]

    Campagnolo, J. C. N. 2018, ASTROPOP: ASTROnomical Polarimetry and Photometry pipeline, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.024

    2018

  12. [12]

    C., & Magalh˜ aes, A

    Carciofi, A. C., & Magalh˜ aes, A. M. 2005, ApJ, 635, 570, doi: 10.1086/497064

    work page doi:10.1086/497064 2005

  13. [13]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 4146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2545

    Cikota, A., Patat, F., Cikota, S., & Faran, T. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2545

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2545 2017

  14. [14]

    2017, A&A, 600, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629705

    Claret, A. 2017, A&A, 600, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629705

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629705 2017

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Claret, A., & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116451

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116451 2011

  16. [16]

    2019, PASP, 131, 013001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae5c5

    Deming, D., Louie, D., & Sheets, H. 2019, PASP, 131, 013001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae5c5

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aae5c5 2019

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Dorn, C., Khan, A., Heng, K., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424915

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424915 2015

  18. [18]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067 30 Figure 16.TESS (or K2) light curves of the seven exoplanet transits analyzed in this work. Light blue points show the photometric data around the transits, dark blue points show binned data (bin size 0.002 d), and red lines indicate the best-fit joint SPA...

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  19. [19]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Fossati, L., Bagnulo, S., Mason, E., & Landi Degl’Innocenti, E. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 364, The Future of

    2007

  20. [20]

    E., et al

    Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748, doi: 10.1086/117915

    work page doi:10.1086/117915 1996

  21. [21]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33 2019

  22. [22]

    W., & Calabretta, M

    Greisen, E. W., & Calabretta, M. R. 2002, A&A, 395, 1061, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021326

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021326 2002

  23. [23]

    E., Fitzgerald, M

    Harris, W. E., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Reed, B. C. 1981, PASP, 93, 507, doi: 10.1086/130868 32 Figure 23.Same as Figure 17, but for the transit of HATS-9 b observed on 2024-06-15. Figure 24.Same as Figure 17, but for the transit of HATS-9 b observed on 2024-06-17

    work page doi:10.1086/130868 1981

  24. [24]

    B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al

    Howell, S. B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 398, doi: 10.1086/676406

    work page doi:10.1086/676406 2014

  25. [25]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  26. [26]

    1994, PASP, 106, 1172, doi: 10.1086/133495

    Jablonski, F., Baptista, R., Barroso, J., et al. 1994, PASP, 106, 1172, doi: 10.1086/133495

    work page doi:10.1086/133495 1994

  27. [27]

    M., Yakobchuk, T

    Kostogryz, N. M., Yakobchuk, T. M., & Berdyugina, S. V. 2015, ApJ, 806, 97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/97

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/97 2015

  28. [28]

    2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 1161, doi: 10.1086/683602

    Kreidberg, L. 2015, PASP, 127, 1161, doi: 10.1086/683602 Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J. V. d. M., Hedges, C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library. http://ascl.net/1812.013

    work page doi:10.1086/683602 2015

  29. [29]

    J., Rodrigues, C

    Lima, I. J., Rodrigues, C. V., Ferreira Lopes, C. E., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 225, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abeb16 Magalh˜ aes, A. M., Benedetti, E., & Roland, E. H. 1984, PASP, 96, 383, doi: 10.1086/131351

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abeb16 2021

  30. [30]

    Martioli, E., H´ ebrard, G., Correia, A. C. M., Laskar, J., & Lecavelier des Etangs, A. 2021, A&A, 649, A177, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040235

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040235 2021

  31. [31]

    D., Angerhausen, D., et al

    Martioli, E., Col´ on, K. D., Angerhausen, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4264, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3009

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3009 2018

  32. [32]

    2020, A&A, 641, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038695

    Martioli, E., H´ ebrard, G., Moutou, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038695

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038695 2020

  33. [33]

    2022, A&A, 660, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142540

    Martioli, E., H´ ebrard, G., Fouqu´ e, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142540

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142540 2022

  34. [34]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.07011, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.07011

    Martioli, E., H´ ebrard, G., de Almeida, L., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.07011, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.07011

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.07011 2023

  35. [35]

    P., Jofr´ e, E., et al

    Martioli, E., Petrucci, R. P., Jofr´ e, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A312, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450334

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450334 2024

  36. [36]

    V., Campagnolo, J., et al

    Martioli, E., Rodrigues, C. V., Campagnolo, J., et al. 2025, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of Brazil, 36, 65

    2025

  37. [37]

    C., Martioli, E., Rodrigues, C

    Mattiuci, A. C., Martioli, E., Rodrigues, C. V., et al. 2024, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of Brazil, 35, 199

    2024

  38. [38]

    C., Rofrigues, C

    Mattiuci, A. C., Rofrigues, C. V., Campagnolo, J. C. N., et al. 2025, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of Brazil, 36, 186

    2025

  39. [39]

    D., & Homeier, D

    Morello, G., Tsiaras, A., Howarth, I. D., & Homeier, D. 2017, AJ, 154, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8405 Neves Campagnolo, J. C. 2019, PASP, 131, 024501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecc2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa8405 2017

  40. [40]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series , author =

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:2000169 2000

  41. [41]

    2005, ApJ, 622, 1118, doi: 10.1086/428344

    Ohta, Y., Taruya, A., & Suto, Y. 2005, ApJ, 622, 1118, doi: 10.1086/428344

    work page doi:10.1086/428344 2005

  42. [42]

    doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , eid =

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  43. [43]

    V., Cieslinski, D., & Steiner, J

    Rodrigues, C. V., Cieslinski, D., & Steiner, J. E. 1998, A&A, 335, 979, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9805193

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9805193 1998

  44. [44]

    V., Taylor, K., Jablonski, F

    Rodrigues, C. V., Taylor, K., Jablonski, F. J., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S

    2012

  45. [45]

    McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 844626, doi: 10.1117/12.924976

    work page doi:10.1117/12.924976

  46. [46]

    V., Gneiding, C

    Rodrigues, C. V., Gneiding, C. D., Almeida, L., et al. 2024, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of Brazil, 35, 44

    2024

  47. [47]

    Schlindwein, W., Campagnolo, J. C. N., Martioli, E., et al. 2024, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of Brazil, 35, 313

    2024

  48. [48]

    2010, Exoplanet Atmospheres: Physical Processes

    Seager, S. 2010, Exoplanet Atmospheres: Physical Processes

    2010

  49. [49]

    S., & Ford, V

    Serkowski, K., Mathewson, D. S., & Ford, V. L. 1975, ApJ, 196, 261, doi: 10.1086/153410

    work page doi:10.1086/153410 1975

  50. [50]

    R., Collier-Cameron, A., et al

    Smalley, B., Anderson, D. R., Collier-Cameron, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A61, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219731

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219731 2012

  51. [51]

    Snellen, I. A. G., & Brown, A. G. A. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 883, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0561-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0561-6 2018

  52. [52]

    D., Anderson, D

    Turner, O. D., Anderson, D. R., Collier Cameron, A., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 064401, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/064401 33

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/964/064401 2016

  53. [53]

    C., & Varoquaux, G

    Valio, A., Martioli, E., Kovacs, A. O., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.08424. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08424 Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2011.37 2025

  54. [54]

    2000, , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/aas:2000332 2000

  55. [55]

    A., Luvaul, L

    Wolf, C., Onken, C. A., Luvaul, L. C., et al. 2018, PASA, 35, e010, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2018.5

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.5 2018