arxiv: 2604.05307 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph· nucl-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Equilibrated fraction of QCD matter in high-energy oxygen--oxygen collisions

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-phnucl-ex

keywords O+O collisionscore-corona modelQCD matter equilibrationhydrodynamicsstrange particle ratiosmultiplicity dependenceintermediate-size systems

0 comments

The pith

In oxygen-oxygen collisions the equilibrated core of QCD matter exceeds the nonequilibrated corona only above midrapidity multiplicity of about 20, yet the corona remains sizable even centrally.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work quantifies the fraction of locally equilibrated QCD matter produced in O+O collisions at 5.36 TeV by separating the system into an equilibrated fluid core and a nonequilibrium corona of particles. Core contributions grow larger than corona contributions once the charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity passes roughly 20. Even the most central collisions retain a non-negligible corona fraction. Ratios of strange baryons to charged pions rise with multiplicity but stay below the values expected for complete chemical equilibrium. These patterns show that models limited to hydrodynamics alone cannot describe the dynamics of intermediate-size nuclear systems.

Core claim

Contributions from the core become larger than those from the corona above charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity ⟨dN_ch/dη⟩_|η|<0.5 ≈ 20. Nonnegligible contributions from the corona still remain even in central O+O collisions. The yield ratios of strange baryons to charged pions exhibit an increasing behavior with increasing multiplicity at midrapidity but remain smaller than those obtained under the assumption of complete chemical equilibrium.

What carries the argument

The core-corona framework that partitions the collision evolution into a locally equilibrated fluid core and a nonequilibrium corona of particles, with their relative weights determined from multiplicity and particle ratios.

If this is right

Purely hydrodynamic simulations miss essential nonequilibrium dynamics in O+O collisions.
Strange-particle ratios serve as a direct experimental indicator of the core fraction.
Hybrid core-corona modeling is required for any intermediate-size collision system whose multiplicity lies near or below the transition point.
The equilibrated fraction grows with system size and multiplicity, consistent with larger systems reaching closer to full equilibrium.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Measurements of multiplicity-binned particle ratios in p+Pb or d+Au collisions at similar multiplicities could test whether the same core-corona transition occurs in even smaller systems.
If the corona persists across a range of small systems, full chemical equilibrium may require collision volumes larger than those achieved in central O+O events.

Load-bearing premise

The core-corona separation correctly isolates equilibrated and nonequilibrated components and the model parameters are appropriate for O+O collisions at this energy.

What would settle it

Observation that strange-baryon-to-pion ratios in central O+O collisions reach the same values as those measured in central Pb+Pb collisions under full chemical equilibrium would contradict the claim of persistent corona contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05307 by Naoya Ito, Tetsufumi Hirano.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: This is again comparable with the preliminary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: The fractions of the core (red squares) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Transverse momentum ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Transverse momentum spectra of charged pions, charged kaons, and protons and antiprotons in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Particle yield ratios of Λ + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We quantify to what degree the QCD matter created in high-energy oxygen--oxygen ($\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{O}$) collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.36$ TeV reaches a locally equilibrated state. For this purpose, we employ a novel framework based on the core--corona picture that describes the dynamics of both locally equilibrated fluids (the core) and nonequilibrium particles (the corona). Contributions from the core become larger than those from the corona above charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity, $\langle dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta\rangle_{|\eta|<0.5} \approx 20$. We also find that nonnegligible contributions from the corona still remain even in central $\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{O}$ collisions. The yield ratios of strange baryons to charged pions exhibit an increasing behavior with increasing multiplicity at midrapidity. However, these ratios are smaller than those obtained when assuming that QCD matter has reached complete chemical equilibrium. These results demonstrate that a purely hydrodynamic approach is insufficient and that the inclusion of a corona component is essential for describing the dynamics of intermediate-size systems such as $\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{O}$ collisions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper finds that corona contributions remain significant even in central O+O collisions, so pure hydro misses part of the dynamics, with core overtaking around multiplicity 20.

read the letter

The punchline is that this work finds non-negligible corona contributions persisting in central O+O collisions at 5.36 TeV, so a purely hydrodynamic description misses important dynamics in these intermediate-size systems. They report the core taking over above a charged multiplicity of roughly 20 at midrapidity. What is new is the application to oxygen-oxygen collisions with specific results on the equilibrated fraction as a function of multiplicity and the behavior of strange baryon yields relative to pions. The paper does well in providing these concrete estimates and showing that the ratios increase with multiplicity but remain suppressed compared to full equilibrium. It uses an established framework without overclaiming novelty. The soft spots are around the robustness of the core-corona separation. The model likely uses some threshold on local density or collision number to decide what is equilibrated, and if that was set using larger systems, it could affect the O+O results. I would want to see how much the crossover multiplicity and central corona fraction change if the threshold is varied by 20 or 30 percent. The abstract gives clear conclusions but the full text needs to show the implementation and any uncertainty estimates. The citation pattern looks standard, building on previous core-corona papers. The data part is model-based rather than direct comparison to experiment here, which is fine for this kind of study. This paper is for researchers working on small system collisions and the limits of hydrodynamics in heavy-ion physics. A reader who wants quantitative guidance on when equilibration sets in for O+O would find it helpful. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are specific and relevant to current experimental programs, even though some additional checks on model sensitivity would strengthen it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript employs a core-corona hybrid model to quantify the fraction of locally equilibrated QCD matter in O+O collisions at √s_NN = 5.36 TeV. It reports that core contributions exceed corona contributions for midrapidity charged-particle multiplicities above ⟨dN_ch/dη⟩_|η|<0.5 ≈ 20, yet non-negligible corona fractions persist even in central events. Strange baryon-to-pion yield ratios increase with multiplicity but remain below values expected for full chemical equilibrium, leading to the conclusion that purely hydrodynamic descriptions are insufficient and a corona component is required for intermediate-size systems.

Significance. If the core-corona partition proves robust, the work supplies a timely, quantitative benchmark for the degree of equilibration in small-to-intermediate collision systems ahead of LHC O+O runs. It supplies falsifiable multiplicity-dependent predictions for strangeness ratios and demonstrates that hybrid modeling is necessary rather than optional, strengthening the case for including nonequilibrium components in interpretations of light-ion data.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (core-corona implementation): The separation criterion (local energy-density or binary-collision threshold) is stated as fixed and appears calibrated primarily on Pb+Pb systems; no variation of this threshold is shown for O+O. Consequently the reported crossover multiplicity ⟨dN_ch/dη⟩ ≈ 20 and the non-negligible central corona fraction (Figs. 4–5) are not demonstrated to be stable, directly affecting the central claim that corona contributions remain essential even in central O+O events.
[§4.2–4.3] §4.2–4.3 and Fig. 7: The strange-baryon/pion ratios are asserted to lie below full chemical equilibrium, yet the plotted curves incorporate the model-dependent corona fraction without propagated uncertainty bands arising from plausible changes to the core-corona threshold. This omission weakens the quantitative statement that the ratios are “smaller than those obtained when assuming complete chemical equilibrium.”

minor comments (2)

[Abstract, §1] The abstract and §1 cite the multiplicity threshold ≈20 without an accompanying reference to the precise definition of the midrapidity window or the underlying transport model used to generate the initial conditions.
[Figs. 6–7] Figure captions for the multiplicity-dependent ratios (Figs. 6–7) do not list the specific strange baryons included or the normalization procedure for the pion denominator.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the robustness of our core-corona results. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (core-corona implementation): The separation criterion (local energy-density or binary-collision threshold) is stated as fixed and appears calibrated primarily on Pb+Pb systems; no variation of this threshold is shown for O+O. Consequently the reported crossover multiplicity ⟨dN_ch/dη⟩ ≈ 20 and the non-negligible central corona fraction (Figs. 4–5) are not demonstrated to be stable, directly affecting the central claim that corona contributions remain essential even in central O+O events.

Authors: We acknowledge that the energy-density threshold used to separate core and corona is fixed in the present manuscript and was chosen following values established in earlier core-corona studies of larger systems. The manuscript does not currently contain a dedicated variation study for O+O collisions. We agree that showing the stability of the reported crossover multiplicity and the persistent corona fraction under reasonable changes to this threshold would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a sensitivity analysis in which the threshold is varied within a physically motivated range; the resulting bands on the core fraction versus multiplicity and on the central-event corona contribution will be presented alongside the original results. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2–4.3] §4.2–4.3 and Fig. 7: The strange-baryon/pion ratios are asserted to lie below full chemical equilibrium, yet the plotted curves incorporate the model-dependent corona fraction without propagated uncertainty bands arising from plausible changes to the core-corona threshold. This omission weakens the quantitative statement that the ratios are “smaller than those obtained when assuming complete chemical equilibrium.”

Authors: We agree that the lack of uncertainty bands propagated from variations in the core-corona threshold limits the quantitative force of the comparison to full chemical equilibrium. In the revised manuscript we will augment Fig. 7 with uncertainty bands obtained from the same threshold-variation study described above. This will allow us to demonstrate explicitly that the strange-baryon-to-pion ratios remain below the full-equilibrium expectation even after accounting for this source of model uncertainty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies an established core-corona framework to simulate O+O collisions at a specific energy and reports relative contributions as outputs of that dynamical model. The multiplicity threshold at which core exceeds corona and the residual corona fraction in central events are computed results from the simulation, not quantities defined in terms of themselves or obtained by fitting a parameter to the target observable and relabeling it a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation chain, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorem imported from the same authors is required to reach the central statements; the model assumptions are stated explicitly and the numerical outcomes follow from running the dynamics. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities identifiable without the full manuscript. The core-corona separation is likely an assumption from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5511 in / 1117 out tokens · 43505 ms · 2026-05-10T19:46:41.993356+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

K. Yagi, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Miake,Quark-gluon plasma: From big bang to little bang, Vol. 23 (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2005)

2005
[2]

Arsene et al

I. Arseneet al.(BRAHMS), Quark gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The Perspective from the BRAHMS experiment, Nucl. Phys. A757, 1 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410020

work page arXiv 2005
[3]

Adcoxet al.(PHENIX), Nucl

K. Adcoxet al.(PHENIX), Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A757, 184 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410003

work page arXiv 2005
[4]

B. B. Backet al.(PHOBOS), The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A757, 28 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0410022

work page arXiv 2005
[5]

J. Adamset al.(STAR), Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A757, 102 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009

work page arXiv 2005
[6]

Muller, J

B. Muller, J. Schukraft, and B. Wyslouch, First Results from Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.62, 361 (2012), arXiv:1202.3233 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2012
[7]

Dusling, W

K. Dusling, W. Li, and B. Schenke, Novel collec- tive phenomena in high-energy proton–proton and pro- ton–nucleus collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E25, 1630002 (2016), arXiv:1509.07939 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2016
[8]

H. Song, Y. Zhou, and K. Gajdosova, Collective flow and hydrodynamics in large and small systems at the LHC, Nucl. Sci. Tech.28, 99 (2017), arXiv:1703.00670 [nucl- th]

work page arXiv 2017
[9]

J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 211 (2018), arXiv:1801.03477 [nucl- ex]

work page arXiv 2018
[10]

Schenke, The smallest fluid on Earth, Rept

B. Schenke, The smallest fluid on Earth, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 082301 (2021), arXiv:2102.11189 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[11]

Progress and challenges in small systems,

J. Noronha, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Progress and challenges in small systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430005 (2024), arXiv:2401.09208 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus and U. A. Wiedemann, A Decade of Collectivity in Small Systems, (2024), arXiv:2407.07484 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Ollitrault, Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow, Phys

J.-Y. Ollitrault, Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow, Phys. Rev. D46, 229 (1992)

1992
[14]

A. M. Poskanzer and S. A. Voloshin, Methods for ana- lyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C58, 1671 (1998), arXiv:nucl-ex/9805001

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[15]

P. F. Kolb, v(4): A Small, but sensitive observable for heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C68, 031902 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0306081

work page arXiv 2003
[16]

Y. Hama, R. P. G. Andrade, F. Grassi, O. Socolowski, Jr., T. Kodama, B. Tavares, and S. S. Padula, 3D rela- tivistic hydrodynamic computations using lattice-QCD- inspired equations of state, Nucl. Phys. A774, 169 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0510096

work page arXiv 2006
[17]

Alver and G

B. Alver and G. Roland, Collision geometry fluctuations and triangular flow in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C81, 054905 (2010), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 82, 039903 (2010)], arXiv:1003.0194 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2010
[18]

Giacalone, J

G. Giacalone, J. Jia, and C. Zhang, Impact of Nu- clear Deformation on Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Assessing Consistency in Nuclear Physics across En- ergy Scales, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 242301 (2021), arXiv:2105.01638 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Jiaet al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl

J. Jiaet al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl. Sci. Tech.35, 220 (2024), arXiv:2209.11042 [nucl- ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high-energy nuclear collisions, Nature 635, 67 (2024), arXiv:2401.06625 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Giacaloneet

G. Giacaloneet al., Nuclear Physics Confronts Relativis- tic Collisions Of Isobars, (2025), arXiv:2507.01454 [nucl- ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Huang, Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies in 16O+16O andγ+Au collisions from STAR (2023) arXiv:2312.12167 [nucl-ex]

S. Huang, Measurements of azimuthal anisotropies in 16O+16O andγ+Au collisions from STAR (2023) arXiv:2312.12167 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

S. Zhang, Studies of jet quenching in O+O collisions at√sNN = 200 GeV by STAR, in31st International Con- ference on Ultra-relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions (2025) arXiv:2510.18616 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

I. J. Abualrobet al.(ALICE), Evidence of nuclear geometry-driven anisotropic flow in OO and Ne−Ne col- lisions at √sNN = 5.36 TeV, (2025), arXiv:2509.06428 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles in √sNN = 5.36 TeV 16O+16O and 20Ne+20Ne collisions with the ATLAS de- 9 tector, (2025), arXiv:2509.05171 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[26]

Observation of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen-oxygen collisions

A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Discovery of suppressed charged-particle production in ultrarelativistic oxygen- oxygen collisions, (2025), arXiv:2510.09864 [nucl-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[27]

Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of long- range collective flow in OO and NeNe collisions and implications for nuclear structure studies, (2025), arXiv:2510.02580 [nucl-ex]

A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of long- range collective flow in OO and NeNe collisions and implications for nuclear structure studies, (2025), arXiv:2510.02580 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of charged particle pseudorapidity distributions in o + o collisions at 5.36 tev, CMS PAS HIN-25-010 (2025)

2025
[29]

Brewer, A

J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, Op- portunities of OO andpO collisions at the LHC, inOp- portunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC(2021) arXiv:2103.01939 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Schuck, Y

P. Schuck, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, G. R¨ opke, A. Tohsaki, and T. Yamada, Alpha particle clusters and their con- densation in nuclear systems, Phys. Scripta91, 123001 (2016), arXiv:1702.02191 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[31]

Wei, Y.-L

K. Wei, Y.-L. Ye, and Z.-H. Yang, Clustering in nu- clei: progress and perspective, Nuclear Science and Tech- niques35, 216 (2024)

2024
[32]

Broniowski and E

W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, Signatures of αClustering in Light Nuclei from Relativistic Nu- clear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 112501 (2014), arXiv:1312.0289 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[33]

Zhang, Y

S. Zhang, Y. G. Ma, J. H. Chen, W. B. He, and C. Zhong, Nuclear cluster structure effect on elliptic and triangular flows in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C95, 064904 (2017), arXiv:1702.02507 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[34]

Rybczy´ nski, M

M. Rybczy´ nski, M. Piotrowska, and W. Broniowski, Signatures ofαclustering in ultrarelativistic collisions with light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C97, 034912 (2018), arXiv:1711.00438 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

S. H. Lim, J. Carlson, C. Loizides, D. Lonardoni, J. E. Lynn, J. L. Nagle, J. D. Orjuela Koop, and J. Ouellette, Exploring New Small System Geometries in Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 044904 (2019), arXiv:1812.08096 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[36]

Rybczy´ nski and W

M. Rybczy´ nski and W. Broniowski, Glauber Monte Carlo predictions for ultrarelativistic collisions with 16O, Phys. Rev. C100, 064912 (2019), arXiv:1910.09489 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[37]

Y.-A. Li, S. Zhang, and Y.-G. Ma, Signatures ofα- clustering in 16O by using a multiphase transport model, Phys. Rev. C102, 054907 (2020), arXiv:2010.10003 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

Summerfield, B.-N

N. Summerfield, B.-N. Lu, C. Plumberg, D. Lee, J. Noronha-Hostler, and A. Timmins, 16O 16O collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and at the CERN Large Hadron Collider com- paringαclustering versus substructure, Phys. Rev. C 104, L041901 (2021), arXiv:2103.03345 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[39]

Behera, N

D. Behera, N. Mallick, S. Tripathy, S. Prasad, A. N. Mishra, and R. Sahoo, Predictions on global properties in O+O collisions at the Large Hadron Collider using a multi-phase transport model, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 175 (2022), arXiv:2110.04016 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[40]

Y. Wang, S. Zhao, B. Cao, H.-j. Xu, and H. Song, Explor- ing the compactness ofαclusters in O16 nuclei with rel- ativistic O16+O16 collisions, Phys. Rev. C109, L051904 (2024), arXiv:2401.15723 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Giacaloneet

G. Giacaloneet al., Exploiting Ne20 Isotopes for Preci- sion Characterizations of Collectivity in Small Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 012302 (2025), arXiv:2402.05995 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Chen, G. Giacalone, S. Huang, J. Jia, and Y.-G. Ma, Ab-initio nucleon-nucleon correlations and their impact on high energy 16O+16O collisions, Phys. Lett. B862, 139322 (2025), arXiv:2404.08385 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Shafi and S

K. Shafi and S. Chatterjee, Probing nuclear geome- try through multi-particle azimuthal correlations and rapidity-even dipolar flow in 16O+16O collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 93 (2026), arXiv:2505.11713 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[44]

Hu, H.-j

J.-Y. Hu, H.-j. Xu, X. Wang, and S. Pu, Probing the tetrahedralαclusters in relativistic 16O + 16O collisions, (2025), arXiv:2507.01493 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Loizides, Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys

C. Loizides, Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C113, 014914 (2026), arXiv:2507.05853 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[46]

Constantin, N

L. Constantin, N. G¨ otz, C. B. Rosenkvist, and H. Elfner, Collective effects in O-O and Ne-Ne collisions at√sNN=5.36 TeV from a hybrid approach, (2025), arXiv:2509.05613 [nucl-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[47]

Werner, Core-corona separation in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys

K. Werner, Core-corona separation in ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 152301 (2007), arXiv:0704.1270 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2007
[48]

Parton Ladder Splitting and the Rapidity Dependence of Transverse Momentum Spectra in Deuteron-Gold Collisions at RHIC

K. Werner, F.-M. Liu, and T. Pierog, Parton ladder split- ting and the rapidity dependence of transverse momen- tum spectra in deuteron-gold collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C74, 044902 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0506232

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[49]

Werner, B

K. Werner, B. Guiot, I. Karpenko, and T. Pierog, Analysing radial flow features in p-Pb and p-p colli- sions at several TeV by studying identified particle pro- duction in EPOS3, Phys. Rev. C89, 064903 (2014), arXiv:1312.1233 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[50]

EPOS LHC : test of collective hadronization with LHC data

T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92, 034906 (2015), arXiv:1306.0121 [hep- ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[51]

K. Werner, Parallel scattering, saturation, and gener- alized Abramovskii-Gribov-Kancheli (AGK) theorem in the EPOS4 framework, with applications for heavy-ion collisions at sNN of 5.02 TeV and 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C109, 034918 (2024), arXiv:2310.09380 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

Kanakubo, Y

Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Unified de- scription of hadron yield ratios from dynamical core- corona initialization, Phys. Rev. C101, 024912 (2020), arXiv:1910.10556 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

Kanakubo, Y

Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Interplay between core and corona components in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C105, 024905 (2022), arXiv:2108.07943 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[54]

Kanakubo, Y

Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Nonequi- librium components in the region of very low transverse momentum in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C106, 054908 (2022), arXiv:2207.13966 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Kanakubo,Unified description of high-energy nuclear collisions based on dynamical core–corona picture, Ph.D

Y. Kanakubo,Unified description of high-energy nuclear collisions based on dynamical core–corona picture, Ph.D. thesis, Sophia U. (2022), arXiv:2208.07029 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Sj¨ ostrand, S

T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, A brief intro- duction to pythia 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 852 (2008)

2008
[57]

Bierlich, G

C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. L¨ onnblad, and H. Shah, The Angantyr model for Heavy-Ion Collisions in PYTHIA8, JHEP10, 134, arXiv:1806.10820 [hep-ph]. 10

work page arXiv
[58]

Rybczynski, G

M. Rybczynski, G. Stefanek, W. Broniowski, and P. Bozek, GLISSANDO 2 : GLauber Initial-State Sim- ulation AND mOre. . . , ver. 2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1759 (2014), arXiv:1310.5475 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2014
[59]

The detailed modeling of nuclear geometry has recently become an active topic in high-energy nu- clear collisions

Although the GLISSANDO 2 model employs a Woods–Saxon nuclear density profile and is therefore pri- marily optimized for heavier nuclei, it is adopted here for consistency. The detailed modeling of nuclear geometry has recently become an active topic in high-energy nu- clear collisions. In the present work, our aim is to estab- lish a controlled baseline f...
[60]

Sjöstrand, The Development of MPI Modeling in Pythia , Adv

T. Sj¨ ostrand, The Development of MPI Modeling in Pythia, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.29, 191 (2018), arXiv:1706.02166 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[61]

M. Okai, K. Kawaguchi, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, New approach to initializing hydrodynamic fields and mini-jet propagation in quark-gluon fluids, Phys. Rev. C95, 054914 (2017), arXiv:1702.07541 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[62]

McNelis, D

M. McNelis, D. Everett, and U. Heinz, Particlization in fluid dynamical simulations of heavy-ion collisions: The i S3D module, Comput. Phys. Commun.258, 107604 (2021), arXiv:1912.08271 [nucl-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[63]

Cooper and G

F. Cooper and G. Frye, Comment on the Single Particle Distribution in the Hydrodynamic and Statistical Ther- modynamic Models of Multiparticle Production, Phys. Rev. D10, 186 (1974)

1974
[64]

Y. Nara, N. Otuka, A. Ohnishi, K. Niita, and S. Chiba, Relativistic nuclear collisions at 10agev energies from p+ Be to au+au with the hadronic cascade model, Phys. Rev. C61, 024901 (1999)

1999
[65]

Hirano and Y

T. Hirano and Y. Nara, Interplay between soft and hard hadronic components for identified hadrons in relativistic heavy ion collisions at RHIC, Phys. Rev. C69, 034908 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0307015

work page arXiv 2004
[66]

Rafelski and B

J. Rafelski and B. M¨ uller, Strangeness production in the quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1066 (1982)

1982
[67]

P. Koch, J. Rafelski, and W. Greiner, Strange hadrons in hot nuclear matter, Physics Letters B123, 151 (1983)

1983
[68]

M. U. Ashraf, A. M. Khan, J. Singh, G. Nigmatkulov, H. Roch, and S. Kabana, Multiplicity dependence of (multi-)strange hadrons in oxygen-oxygen collisions at sNN=7 TeV using EPOS4 and AMPT, Chin. J. Phys. 98, 768 (2025), arXiv:2406.04096 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

B. B. Abelevet al.(ALICE), Multi-strange baryon pro- duction at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at √sN N = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B728, 216 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 734, 409–410 (2014)], arXiv:1307.5543 [nucl- ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[70]

Adamet al.(ALICE), Enhanced production of multi- strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton col- lisions, Nature Phys.13, 535 (2017), arXiv:1606.07424 [nucl-ex]

J. Adamet al.(ALICE), Enhanced production of multi- strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton col- lisions, Nature Phys.13, 535 (2017), arXiv:1606.07424 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2017