pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.05171 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-05 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex

Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles in sqrt{s_(NN)}=5.36 TeV ¹⁶O+¹⁶O and ²⁰Ne+²⁰Ne collisions with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-ex
keywords azimuthal anisotropynuclear deformationlight-ion collisionselliptic flowLHCATLASv2nuclear structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Enhanced v2 in central neon-neon collisions reveals prolate deformation of neon nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the first measurements of azimuthal anisotropy coefficients vn for n equals 2 to 4 in oxygen-oxygen and neon-neon collisions at 5.36 TeV. The vn values are extracted as functions of transverse momentum and centrality using two-particle correlations with template-fit non-flow subtraction and four-particle subevent cumulants that suppress non-flow. A clear hierarchy vn2 greater than vn3 greater than vn4 appears with a maximum near 2 GeV, and central neon-neon events show distinctly larger v2 than oxygen-oxygen events. The difference matches expectations from nuclear models that assign a prolate shape to neon and a near-tetrahedral shape to oxygen. These light-ion results supply new constraints on how initial nuclear geometry drives hydrodynamic flow.

Core claim

Detailed comparisons between the two collision systems reveal an enhanced v2 in central 20Ne+20Ne collisions, consistent with theory expectations based on the predicted prolate deformation of neon nuclei, in contrast to the slightly tetrahedral structure predicted for oxygen. The four-particle cumulant results highlight strong event-by-event fluctuations and provide the greatest sensitivity to nuclear shape effects.

What carries the argument

Comparison of elliptic flow v2 between central 20Ne+20Ne and 16O+16O collisions after non-flow subtraction, with four-particle cumulants supplying extra sensitivity to shape-driven fluctuations.

If this is right

  • The measurements constrain initial geometry and hydrodynamic response in light-ion collisions.
  • Four-particle cumulants supply the greatest sensitivity to nuclear shape effects through event-by-event fluctuations.
  • Results give new input for models of nuclear structure in light nuclei.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same collision systems could be used to test nuclear-shape predictions for other light nuclei.
  • Higher-statistics data might separate deformation effects from hydrodynamic response more cleanly.
  • Light-ion flow measurements at colliders could serve as a complementary probe to traditional nuclear-structure techniques.

Load-bearing premise

The observed difference in v2 is attributed primarily to nuclear deformation after non-flow subtraction, assuming that residual non-flow contributions and differences in collision dynamics between the two systems are fully controlled by the template-fit and cumulant methods.

What would settle it

A follow-up analysis that finds no significant v2 enhancement in central neon-neon collisions once non-flow subtraction is tightened would falsify the attribution to nuclear shape.

read the original abstract

This paper presents the first measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy coefficients $v_{n}$, which quantify the $n^{\mathrm{th}}$-order Fourier modulation of charged-particle azimuthal distributions, for $n=2$-4 in $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.36$ TeV $\mathrm{^{16}O}+\mathrm{^{16}O}$ and $\mathrm{^{20}Ne}+\mathrm{^{20}Ne}$ collisions recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2025. The $v_{n}$ coefficients are measured as a function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$), collision centrality, and event multiplicity. They are extracted using two complementary methods: two-particle correlations with a template-fit subtraction of short-range non-flow contributions, and four-particle subevent cumulants, which intrinsically suppress non-flow effects and provide sensitivity to flow fluctuations. The results show a clear hierarchy $v_{2} > v_{3} > v_{4}$ and a non-monotonic dependence on $p_{\mathrm{T}}$, reaching a maximum around 2 GeV, consistent with trends observed in heavy-ion collisions. Detailed comparisons between the two collision systems reveal an enhanced $v_{2}$ in central $\mathrm{^{20}Ne}+\mathrm{^{20}Ne}$ collisions, consistent with theory expectations based on the predicted prolate deformation of neon nuclei, in contrast to the slightly tetrahedral structure predicted for oxygen. The four-particle cumulant results highlight strong event-by-event fluctuations and provide the greatest sensitivity to nuclear shape effects. These measurements can place new constraints on the initial geometry and the hydrodynamic response in light-ion collisions, offering valuable input for models of nuclear structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy coefficients v_n (n=2-4) in √s_NN = 5.36 TeV 16O+16O and 20Ne+20Ne collisions with the ATLAS detector. The v_n are measured as a function of p_T, centrality, and multiplicity using two-particle correlations with template-fit non-flow subtraction and four-particle subevent cumulants. The results indicate a clear hierarchy v2 > v3 > v4 with p_T dependence peaking around 2 GeV, and an enhanced v2 in central Ne+Ne collisions, which is interpreted as evidence for the prolate deformation of neon nuclei in contrast to the tetrahedral structure of oxygen.

Significance. Should the attribution to nuclear deformation hold after rigorous control of non-flow effects, this measurement would offer significant new constraints on nuclear structure and the initial conditions for hydrodynamic modeling in light nuclear collisions, bridging nuclear physics and heavy-ion phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The abstract asserts an 'enhanced v2 in central 20Ne+20Ne collisions' consistent with prolate deformation but provides no numerical values, error bars, or specific centrality bins, which is essential for evaluating the strength of this central claim.
  2. Analysis and Results: The two-particle template-fit and four-particle cumulant methods are described for non-flow suppression; however, there is no explicit demonstration or table showing that residual non-flow or system-dependent correlations are controlled to a level that does not affect the inter-system v2 comparison, which is load-bearing for the nuclear shape interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: Consider adding a reference to the nuclear structure models predicting the shapes of 16O and 20Ne.
  2. Ensure all figures include clear legends and error bar representations for both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help to strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and outline the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The abstract asserts an 'enhanced v2 in central 20Ne+20Ne collisions' consistent with prolate deformation but provides no numerical values, error bars, or specific centrality bins, which is essential for evaluating the strength of this central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be improved by the inclusion of quantitative details. In the revised version we will add approximate values for the v2 enhancement (including uncertainties) in the most central Ne+Ne collisions together with the specific centrality interval (0–5 % or 0–10 %) used for the comparison. This will allow readers to assess the magnitude of the reported effect directly from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Analysis and Results: The two-particle template-fit and four-particle cumulant methods are described for non-flow suppression; however, there is no explicit demonstration or table showing that residual non-flow or system-dependent correlations are controlled to a level that does not affect the inter-system v2 comparison, which is load-bearing for the nuclear shape interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit demonstration of the residual non-flow level is important for the robustness of the inter-system comparison. The manuscript already presents results from both the template-fit and four-particle cumulant methods and notes their consistency, which provides indirect evidence of control. To address the referee’s point directly we will add a supplementary figure or table in the revised manuscript that quantifies the difference between the two methods as a function of centrality or multiplicity for both collision systems. This will show that any residual non-flow contribution is small, comparable between the two systems, and does not alter the observed v2 enhancement in central Ne+Ne collisions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper reports direct extractions of v_n coefficients from collision data using two-particle template fits and four-particle cumulants, both standard techniques whose outputs are determined by the input particle distributions rather than by any internal equation that loops back to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity. The central observation of enhanced v2 in central Ne+Ne collisions is presented as a data-driven result whose interpretation as nuclear deformation is compared against external theoretical predictions of nuclear shapes; this comparison does not constitute a derivation step that reduces to the paper's own fitted inputs. Minor self-citations to prior ATLAS analyses of similar observables are present but are not load-bearing for the primary claims, which remain independently verifiable against the recorded events.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard heavy-ion physics assumptions rather than new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Azimuthal anisotropy coefficients v_n quantify collective flow arising from initial geometric asymmetries in the nuclear overlap region.
    This standard interpretation connects the measured v_n to nuclear shape differences.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5872 in / 1285 out tokens · 55500 ms · 2026-05-18T18:57:47.126908+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Detailed comparisons between the two collision systems reveal an enhanced v2 in central 20Ne+20Ne collisions, consistent with theory expectations based on the predicted prolate deformation of neon nuclei, in contrast to the slightly tetrahedral structure predicted for oxygen.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The vn coefficients are measured as a function of transverse momentum (pT), collision centrality, and event multiplicity. They are extracted using two complementary methods: two-particle correlations with a template-fit subtraction of short-range non-flow contributions, and four-particle subevent cumulants

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Measurement of charged-particle production in $\sqrt{s_\text{NN}}=9.62$ TeV proton-oxygen collisions as a probe of cosmic-ray air showers with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    ATLAS measured charged-particle production in 9.62 TeV p-O collisions, yielding a fiducial pO cross section of 396 mb and extrapolated p-air inelastic cross section of 406 mb, with distributions an order of magnitude ...

  2. Nuclear geometry driven symmetry plane correlations in OO and Ne--Ne collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulations of OO and Ne-Ne collisions at 5.36 TeV show symmetry plane correlations that differ in a pattern consistent with tetrahedral 16O and deformed 20Ne nuclear shapes.

  3. Data-driven method to estimate contamination from light ion beam transmutation at colliders

    physics.acc-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A data-driven method is introduced to quantify contamination effects from light-ion beam transmutation using time-dependent control regions and a simple illustrative model.

  4. Equilibrated fraction of QCD matter in high-energy oxygen--oxygen collisions

    nucl-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The equilibrated core in O+O collisions overtakes the nonequilibrium corona above midrapidity multiplicity of about 20, yet corona contributions persist in central events, making pure hydrodynamics inadequate.

  5. The size of the quark-gluon plasma in ultracentral collisions: impact of initial density fluctuations on the average transverse momentum

    nucl-th 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Volume variation with multiplicity in ultracentral collisions is small when total entropy scales with nuclear mass number, as shown by relating it to initial density fluctuation profiles.

  6. Collective effects in O-O and Ne-Ne collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$=5.36 TeV from a hybrid approach

    nucl-th 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Predictions for collective flow in O-O collisions at 5.36 TeV are generated with SMASH-vHLLE hybrid, pure SMASH, and Angantyr models to probe the onset of QGP formation in small systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 52 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    STAR Collaboration, Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark gluon plasma: The STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions, Nucl. Phys. A757 (2005) 102, arXiv:nucl-ex/0501009 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    PHOBOS Collaboration, The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC, Nucl. Phys. A757 (2005) 28, arXiv:nucl-ex/0410022 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    PHENIX Collaboration, Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: Experimental evaluation by the PHENIX Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A757 (2005) 184, arXiv:nucl-ex/0410003 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    BRAHMS Collaboration, Quark–gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The perspective from the BRAHMS experiment, Nucl. Phys. A757(2005) 1, arXiv: nucl-ex/0410020 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the pseudorapidity and transverse momentum dependence of the elliptic flow of charged particles in lead–lead collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B707 (2012) 330, arXiv:1108.6018 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles produced in√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 997, arXiv: 1808.03951 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged-particle production in Xe+Xe collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.44TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C101 (2020) 024906, arXiv: 1911.04812 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the elliptic anisotropy of charged particles produced in PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV, Phys. Rev. C87(2013) 014902, arXiv:1204.1409 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    CMS Collaboration,Charged-particle angular correlations in XeXe collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.44TeV, Phys. Rev. C100 (2019) 044902, arXiv:1901.07997 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    ALICE Collaboration,Elliptic Flow of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 2.76TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010) 252302, arXiv:1011.3914 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    ALICE Collaboration, Anisotropic flow in Xe-Xe collisions at√sNN = 5.44TeV, Phys. Lett. B784 (2018) 82, arXiv:1805.01832 [nucl-ex]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Ollitrault,Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow, Phys

    J.-Y. Ollitrault,Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 229

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68 (2018) 339, arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    B. H. Alver, C. Gombeaud, M. Luzum, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Triangular flow in hydrodynamics and transport theory, Phys. Rev. C82(2010) 034913, arXiv: 1007.5469 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy for charged particle production in√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV lead–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C86 (2012) 014907, arXiv: 1203.3087 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the distributions of event-by-event flow harmonics in lead–lead collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeVwith the ATLAS detector at the LHC, JHEP11 (2013) 183, arXiv: 1305.2942 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    CMS Collaboration,Non-Gaussian elliptic-flow fluctuations in PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 643, arXiv:1711.05594 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    ALICE Collaboration,Energy dependence and fluctuations of anisotropic flow in Pb-Pb collisions at √𝑠NN = 5.02 and 2.76 TeV, JHEP07(2018) 103, arXiv:1804.02944 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of event-plane correlations in√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV lead–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 024905, arXiv:1403.0489 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    ALICE Collaboration, Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in𝑝-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 5.02TeV, Phys. Lett. B719 (2013) 29, arXiv:1212.2001 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of Associated Near-Side and Away-Side Long-Range Correlations in√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV Proton–Lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 182302, arXiv:1212.5198 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of Long-Range Elliptic Azimuthal Anisotropies in√𝑠 = 13and 2.76TeV 𝑝 𝑝Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 172301, arXiv: 1509.04776 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration, Evidence for collectivity in𝑝 𝑝collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B765 (2017) 193, arXiv:1606.06198 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    STAR Collaboration, Measurement of flow coefficients in high-multiplicity𝑝 + 𝐴𝑢, 𝑑 + 𝐴𝑢, and 3𝐻𝑒 + 𝐴𝑢 collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C110 (2024) 064902, arXiv: 2312.07464 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    STAR Collaboration, Measurements of the Elliptic and Triangular Azimuthal Anisotropies in Central 3𝐻𝑒 + 𝐴𝑢, 𝑑 + 𝐴𝑢 and 𝑝 + 𝐴𝑢 Collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 242301, arXiv:2210.11352 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    PHENIX Collaboration, Kinematic dependence of azimuthal anisotropies in𝑝 + 𝐴𝑢, 𝑑 + 𝐴𝑢, and 3𝐻𝑒 + 𝐴𝑢 at √𝑠 𝑁 𝑁 = 200GeV, Phys. Rev. C105 (2022) 024901, arXiv:2107.06634 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    PHENIX Collaboration, Creation of quark–gluon plasma droplets with three distinct geometries, Nature Phys.15(2019) 214, arXiv:1805.02973 [nucl-ex]. 22

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    R. D. Weller and P. Romatschke,One fluid to rule them all: Viscous hydrodynamic description of event-by-event central p+p, p+Pb and Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠 = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 351, arXiv:1701.07145 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Initial state geometry and the role of hydrodynamics in proton-proton, proton-nucleus and deuteron-nucleus collisions

    A. Bzdak, B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan,Initial-state geometry and the role of hydrodynamics in proton-proton, proton-nucleus, and deuteron-nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) 064906, arXiv:1304.3403 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Evidence of strong proton shape fluctuations from incoherent diffraction

    H. Mäntysaari and B. Schenke, Evidence of strong proton shape fluctuations from incoherent diffraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 052301, arXiv:1603.04349 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Hydrodynamic predictions for 5.44 TeV Xe+Xe collisions

    G. Giacalone, J. Noronha-Hostler, M. Luzum, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Hydrodynamic predictions for 5.44 TeV Xe+Xe collisions, Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 034904, arXiv: 1711.08499 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    V. E. Ambruş, S. Schlichting, and C. Werthmann,Collective dynamics in heavy and light-ion collisions. II. Determining the origin of collective behavior in high-energy collisions, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 054025, arXiv:2411.19709 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Noronha, B

    J. Noronha, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao,Progress and challenges in small systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33(2024) 2430005, arXiv:2401.09208 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams

    Z. Citron et al., Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7 (2019) 1159, ed. by A. Dainese et al., arXiv: 1812.06772 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Jia et al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl

    J. Jia et al., Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and nuclear structure across the nuclide chart, Nucl. Sci. Tech.35(2024) 220, arXiv:2209.11042 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    STAR Collaboration,Search for the chiral magnetic effect with isobar collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁=200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C105 (2022) 014901, arXiv:2109.00131 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Giacalone, J

    G. Giacalone, J. Jia, and V. Somà, Accessing the shape of atomic nuclei with relativistic collisions of isobars, Phys. Rev. C104 (2021) L041903, arXiv:2102.08158 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Correlations between flow and transverse momentum in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC with the ATLAS detector: A probe of the heavy-ion initial state and nuclear deformation, Phys. Rev. C107 (2023) 054910, arXiv:2205.00039 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    ALICE Collaboration, Exploring nuclear structure with multiparticle azimuthal correlations at the LHC, (2024), arXiv: 2409.04343 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    STAR Collaboration, Imaging shapes of atomic nuclei in high-energy nuclear collisions, Nature635 (2024) 67, arXiv:2401.06625 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Hergert, Front

    H. Hergert, A Guided Tour of𝑎𝑏 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜 Nuclear Many-Body Theory, Front. in Phys.8 (2020) 379, arXiv: 2008.05061 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Wei, Y.-L

    K. Wei, Y.-L. Ye, and Z.-H. Yang,Clustering in nuclei: progress and perspectives, Nucl. Sci. Tech.35(2024) 216. 23

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Hiura, Y

    J. Hiura, Y. Abe, S. Sait¯o, and O. End¯o, Alpha-Cluster plus16O-Core Model for20Ne and Neighboring Nuclei*), Prog. Theo. Phys.42(1969) 555

    work page 1969

  44. [44]

    Giacalone et al

    G. Giacalone et al., Exploiting 20Ne Isotopes for Precision Characterizations of Collectivity in Small Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 012302, arXiv:2402.05995 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Wang, S.-J

    H.-C. Wang, S.-J. Li, L.-M. Liu, J. Xu, and Z.-Z. Ren, Deformation probes for light nuclei in their collisions at relativistic energies, Phys. Rev. C110 (2024) 034909, arXiv:2409.02452 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of long-range multiparticle azimuthal correlations with the subevent cumulant method in 𝑝 𝑝and 𝑝+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C97 (2018) 024904, arXiv:1708.03559 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv: 2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19 (2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS transition radiation detector (TRT) Fast-OR trigger, ATL-INDET-PUB-2009-002, 2009,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1229213

    work page arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠 = 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    work page arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of flow harmonics with multi-particle cumulants in Pb+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3157, arXiv: 1408.4342 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 205, arXiv: nucl-ex/0701025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    Loizides, Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at LHC, (2025), arXiv: 2507.05853 [nucl-th]

    C. Loizides, Glauber predictions for oxygen and neon collisions at LHC, (2025), arXiv: 2507.05853 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Wang and M

    X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, HIJING: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp, pA, and AA collisions, Phys. Rev. D44 (1991) 3501

    work page 1991

  58. [58]

    Disentangling flow and nonflow correlations via Bayesian unfolding of the event-by-event distributions of harmonic coefficients in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

    J. Jia and S. Mohapatra,Disentangling flow and nonflow correlations via Bayesian unfolding of the event-by-event distributions of harmonic coefficients in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C88 (2013) 014907, arXiv:1304.1471 [nucl-ex]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    PHENIX Collaboration,Dihadron azimuthal correlations in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠NN = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C78 (2008) 014901, arXiv:0801.4545 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  62. [62]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of long-range pseudorapidity correlations and azimuthal harmonics in√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV proton–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C90 (2014) 044906, arXiv:1409.1792 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the correlation between flow harmonics of different order in lead–lead collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 034903, arXiv: 1504.01289 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of long-range azimuthal anisotropies and associated Fourier coefficients for𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 5.02 and 13TeV and𝑝+Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C96(2017) 024908, arXiv:1609.06213 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    CMS Collaboration, Centrality dependence of dihadron correlations and azimuthal anisotropy harmonics in PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2012, arXiv: 1201.3158 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    CMS Collaboration, Long-range and short-range dihadron angular correlations in central PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV, JHEP07(2011) 076, arXiv:1105.2438 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    CMS Collaboration, Studies of azimuthal dihadron correlations in ultra-central PbPb collisions at√𝑠NN = 2.76TeV, JHEP02(2014) 088, arXiv:1312.1845 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    ALICE Collaboration, Harmonic decomposition of two-particle angular correlations in Pb-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B708 (2012) 249, arXiv:1109.2501 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  69. [69]

    ALICE Collaboration, Measurements of long-range two-particle correlation over a wide pseudorapidity range in p−Pb collisions at√𝑠NN = 5.02TeV, JHEP01 (2024) 199, arXiv: 2308.16590 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz, and U. Wiedemann, FEMTOSCOPY IN RELATIVISTIC HEAVY ION COLLISIONS: Two Decades of Progress, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55 (2005) 357, arXiv:nucl-ex/0505014 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  71. [71]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of long-range two-particle azimuthal correlations in𝑍-boson tagged 𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 8 and 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 64, arXiv: 1906.08290 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Flow analysis from multiparticle azimuthal correlations

    N. Borghini, P. M. Dinh, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Flow analysis from multiparticle azimuthal correlations, Phys. Rev. C64(2001) 054901, arXiv: nucl-th/0105040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multi-particle azimuthal correlations

    A. Bilandzic, C. H. Christensen, K. Gulbrandsen, A. Hansen, and Y. Zhou, Generic framework for anisotropic flow analyses with multiparticle azimuthal correlations, Phys. Rev. C89 (2014) 064904, arXiv:1312.3572 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Flow analysis with cumulants: direct calculations

    A. Bilandzic, R. Snellings, and S. Voloshin,Flow analysis with cumulants: Direct calculations, Phys. Rev. C83 (2011) 044913, arXiv:1010.0233 [nucl-ex]. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    J. Jia, M. Zhou, and A. Trzupek, Revealing long-range multiparticle collectivity in small collision systems via subevent cumulants, Phys. Rev. C96 (2017) 034906, arXiv:1701.03830 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    S. A. Voloshin, A. M. Poskanzer, A. Tang, and G. Wang, Elliptic flow in the Gaussian model of eccentricity fluctuations, Phys. Lett. B659 (2008) 537, arXiv: 0708.0800 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Study of the material of the ATLAS inner detector for Run 2 of the LHC, JINST12 (2017) P12009, arXiv:1707.02826 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    Mäntysaari, B

    H. Mäntysaari, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao, Collision-Energy Dependence in Heavy-Ion Collisions from Nonlinear QCD Evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 022302, arXiv:2502.05138 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions

    B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 252301, arXiv:1202.6646 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    3+1D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, (3+1)D hydrodynamic simulation of relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C82(2010) 014903, arXiv:1004.1408 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.