Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremMarangoni-Driven Redistribution and Activity of Piezo1 Molecules in Epithelial and Cancer Cells
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Marangoni surface flows drive Piezo1 clustering near focal adhesions in epithelial cells while cancer cells maintain uniform high-activity distribution.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper establishes that inhomogeneous Piezo1 distribution in epithelial cells arises from Marangoni-driven flows generated by actomyosin-induced tension gradients, concentrating channels near focal adhesions where membrane interactions then influence their activity; in cancer cells a distinct driving force produces uniform distribution together with higher expression and activity that tracks intracellular calcium.
What carries the argument
The Marangoni effect on the cell membrane, in which surface tension gradients induce tangential flows that advect Piezo1 molecules and thereby create inhomogeneous distributions modulated by focal adhesion proximity and contractility.
If this is right
- Lowering actomyosin contractility produces more uniform Piezo1 distribution in epithelial cells.
- Cancer-cell Piezo1 activity remains higher and uniform because its driving force differs from the epithelial case.
- Membrane interactions among Piezo1 molecules near focal adhesions reduce or enhance their collective activity depending on local density.
- Piezo1 activity tracks intracellular calcium concentration in both cell types.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The model suggests experiments that locally alter membrane tension gradients to test whether Piezo1 clustering can be prevented or induced on demand.
- Similar Marangoni-like redistribution may operate in other mechanically active cells such as fibroblasts or immune cells during migration.
- If the driving-force difference is confirmed, it could point to membrane-tension interventions that selectively dampen Piezo1 activity in cancer cells without affecting normal epithelial behavior.
Load-bearing premise
That Marangoni-driven flows and membrane-mediated interactions are the dominant physical mechanisms controlling Piezo1 placement and function, with the model capturing the key biology without needing cell-specific parameter tuning.
What would settle it
Direct measurement showing that imposed surface-tension gradients fail to alter Piezo1 spatial distribution in epithelial cells while leaving focal-adhesion contractility unchanged.
read the original abstract
The activity and distribution of Piezo1 molecules, along with the maturity and strength of focal adhesions (FAs), serve as critical factors influencing cell mechanosensing. Notably, migrating epithelial cells and mesenchymal-like cancer cells exhibit significantly different behaviors regarding these elements. In cancer cells, Piezo1 molecules are distributed uniformly, while in epithelial cells, their distribution is heterogeneous. In epithelial cells, Piezo1 molecules tend to group around FAs, a phenomenon that is enhanced by actomyosin contractility. However, a reduction in contractility results in a more uniform distribution of Piezo1 molecules. The expression and activity levels of Piezo1 molecules are markedly higher in cancer cells compared to epithelial cells. The activity of Piezo1 molecules correlates with the intracellular calcium concentration. Despite the extensive experimental studies on the properties of migrating epithelial and mesenchymal-like cancer cells, the physical explanations remain lacking. The primary objective of this theoretical study is to explore: (i) the inhomogeneous distribution of Piezo1 molecules in epithelial cells in relation to the Marangoni effect, (ii) the heightened activity of Piezo1 molecules in cancer cells by specifying the driving force, and (iii) the influence of membrane-mediated interactions among Piezo1 molecules grouped near FAs in epithelial cells on their activity.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical exploration of Piezo1 distribution and activity differences between migrating epithelial cells (heterogeneous Piezo1 clustering near focal adhesions, contractility-dependent) and mesenchymal-like cancer cells (uniform distribution, higher expression/activity correlated with calcium). It posits that the Marangoni effect from surface-tension gradients drives the inhomogeneous redistribution in epithelial cells, a distinct driving force explains cancer-cell uniformity and elevated activity, and membrane-mediated interactions among clustered Piezo1 molecules modulate activity near FAs.
Significance. If a complete, parameter-controlled model were provided and shown to reproduce the heterogeneous-to-uniform transition and activity differences without hidden fitting, the work could supply a hydrodynamic mechanism linking membrane mechanics to mechanosensing and cell-type behaviors. This might motivate targeted experiments on surface-tension gradients in live cells. At present, the absence of any derivations, governing equations, or validation leaves the physical explanation untestable and non-unique relative to known active trafficking processes.
major comments (3)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the stated objectives for a 'theoretical study' are not accompanied by any governing equations, boundary conditions, or simulation results for the Marangoni flow, surface-tension gradient, or Piezo1 density evolution; without these it is impossible to verify whether the model reproduces the contractility-dependent redistribution or the activity difference as claimed.
- [Abstract] The central claim that Marangoni-driven passive redistribution dominates the observed patterns requires demonstration that a single-parameter hydrodynamic model captures both the epithelial clustering and the cancer-cell uniformity without additional terms for endocytosis, actomyosin anchoring, or lipid partitioning; the manuscript provides no such derivation or comparison.
- [Abstract] No parameter values, free-energy functional, or interaction potential for the membrane-mediated Piezo1 interactions near FAs are supplied, so the assertion that these interactions influence activity cannot be assessed for internal consistency or predictive power.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract is clear on experimental observations but would benefit from a brief statement of the mathematical approach even at this stage.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the current version, which primarily outlines the theoretical objectives, would be strengthened by explicit mathematical details. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested derivations, governing equations, parameter values, and comparisons. Our point-by-point responses follow.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated objectives for a 'theoretical study' are not accompanied by any governing equations, boundary conditions, or simulation results for the Marangoni flow, surface-tension gradient, or Piezo1 density evolution; without these it is impossible to verify whether the model reproduces the contractility-dependent redistribution or the activity difference as claimed.
Authors: We agree that the abstract and current manuscript text do not include these elements. In the revised version we will add a dedicated methods section presenting the full set of governing equations for the membrane hydrodynamics (including the Marangoni stress term arising from local surface-tension gradients), the advection-diffusion equation for Piezo1 density evolution, appropriate boundary conditions at focal adhesions, and representative numerical results that demonstrate contractility-dependent clustering. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that Marangoni-driven passive redistribution dominates the observed patterns requires demonstration that a single-parameter hydrodynamic model captures both the epithelial clustering and the cancer-cell uniformity without additional terms for endocytosis, actomyosin anchoring, or lipid partitioning; the manuscript provides no such derivation or comparison.
Authors: We accept that such a demonstration is necessary and is currently absent. In the revision we will supply an explicit derivation showing how a hydrodynamic model driven solely by a Marangoni stress (parameterized by a single coefficient reflecting Piezo1-induced tension gradients) produces the heterogeneous-to-uniform transition when contractility is varied, and we will include a brief comparison indicating why this passive mechanism is sufficient in the regimes considered without invoking the additional active processes mentioned. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] No parameter values, free-energy functional, or interaction potential for the membrane-mediated Piezo1 interactions near FAs are supplied, so the assertion that these interactions influence activity cannot be assessed for internal consistency or predictive power.
Authors: We agree that the lack of these specifics prevents quantitative assessment. The revised manuscript will define the membrane-mediated interaction via an explicit short-range attractive potential (derived from lipid packing energetics), state the corresponding free-energy functional that couples to local bending and tension, and provide order-of-magnitude parameter estimates drawn from the literature together with the resulting effect on local Piezo1 activity. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: model objectives stated without self-referential derivations or fitted predictions shown
full rationale
The provided abstract and context describe a theoretical exploration linking Piezo1 distribution to the Marangoni effect and activity differences to driving forces and membrane interactions, but contain no equations, parameter-fitting procedures, self-citations, or derivation steps that reduce predictions to inputs by construction. No load-bearing claims are shown to be equivalent to their own assumptions or prior self-references. The derivation chain cannot be walked for circularity because no specific mathematical reductions or ansatzes are exhibited in the text. This is the expected non-finding for an abstract-only view of a modeling paper.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- Marangoni coefficient or equivalent surface tension gradient parameter
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Marangoni effect governs flows in cell membranes affecting protein distribution
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
The mass balance equation for Piezo1 molecules can be expressed as: ... (2) ... The Marangoni number ... fractional derivative ... Caputo’s definition
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Romanov V, Silvani G, Zhu H, Cox DC, Martinac B. An Acoustic Platform for Single‐Cell, High‐ Throughput Measurements of the Viscoelastic Properties of Cells. Small 2020; 17:2005759, DOI: 10.1002/smll.202005759
-
[2]
Tijore A, Yao M, Wang YH, Hariharan A, Nematbakhsh Y, B. Doss LB, Lima CT, Sheetza M. Selective killing of transformed cells by mechanical stretch, Biomaterials 2021; 275:120866. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120866
-
[3]
Cancer cells can be killed mechanically or with combinations of cytoskeletal inhibitors
Tijore A, Yang B, Sheetz M. Cancer cells can be killed mechanically or with combinations of cytoskeletal inhibitors. Front. Pharmacol. 2022; 13:955595, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.955595
-
[4]
Pajic-Lijakovic I, Milivojevic M, Martinac B, McClintock PVE. Targeted elimination of mesenchymal-like cancer cells through cyclic stretch activation of Piezo1 channels: the physical aspects. Biophys. Rev. 2025; 847–865, DOI: 10.1007/s12551-025-01304-y
-
[5]
Adjustable viscoelasticity allows for efficient collective cell migration
Barriga EH and Mayor R. Adjustable viscoelasticity allows for efficient collective cell migration. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019; 93:55-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.027
-
[6]
Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity
Guo YR and MacKinnon R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife 2017; 6:e33660, doi: 10.7554/eLife.33660
-
[7]
Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1
Saotome K, Murthy SE, Kefauver JM, Whitwam T, Patapoutian A, Ward AB. Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature 2018; 554(7693): 481-486, DOI: 10.1038/nature25453
-
[8]
Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization impairs the activity of PIEZO1 channel clusters
Ridone P, Pandzic E, Vassalli M, Cox CD, Macmillan A, Gottlieb PA, Martinac B. Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization impairs the activity of PIEZO1 channel clusters. J. Gen. Physiol. 2019; 152(8):e201912515, DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201912515
-
[9]
Channeling the Force: Piezo1 Mechanotransduction in Cancer Metastasis
Dombroski JA, Hope JM, Sarna NS, King MR. Channeling the Force: Piezo1 Mechanotransduction in Cancer Metastasis. Cells 2021; 10:2815, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112815
-
[10]
Structure deformation and curvature sensing of PIEZO1 in lipid membranes
Yang X, Lin C, Chen X, Li S, Li X, Xiao B. Structure deformation and curvature sensing of PIEZO1 in lipid membranes. Nature 2022; 604:377–383, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04574-8
-
[11]
Direct observation of the conformational states of PIEZO1
Mulhall EM, Gharpure A, Lee RM, Dubin AE, Aaron JS, Marshall KL, Spencer KR, Reiche MA, Henderson SC, Chew T-L, Patapoutian A. Direct observation of the conformational states of PIEZO1. Nature 2023; 620:1117–1125, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06427-4
-
[12]
Yu Y, Wu X, Liu S, Zhao H, Li B, Zhao H, Feng X. Piezo1 regulates migration and invasion of breast cancer cells via modulating cell mechanobiological properties. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53(1), 10–18, doi:10.1093/abbs/gmaa112
-
[13]
Mechanosensitive ion channels in apoptosis and ferroptosis: focusing on the role of Piezo1
Kim Y-J and Hyun J. Mechanosensitive ion channels in apoptosis and ferroptosis: focusing on the role of Piezo1. BMB Rep. 2023; 56(3):145-152, https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2023-0002
-
[14]
Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1) in human cancer
Yu J-L and Liao H-Y. Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1) in human cancer. Biomed. & Pharmacol. 2021; 140:111692, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111692
-
[15]
Regulation of focal complex composition and disassembly by the calcium-dependent protease calpain
Bhatt A, Kaverina I, Otey C, Huttenlocher A. Regulation of focal complex composition and disassembly by the calcium-dependent protease calpain. J. Cell Sci. 2002; 115:3415–3425, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.17.3415. 30
-
[16]
Calpain- mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics
Franco SJ, Rodgers MA, Perrin BJ, Han J, Bennin DA, Critchley DR, Huttenlocher A. Calpain- mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004; 6:977–983, DOI: 10.1038/ncb1175
-
[17]
Franco SJ, Regulating cell migration: Calpains make the cut. J. Cell Sci. 2005; 118:3829–3838, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02562
-
[18]
Saxena M, Changede R, Hone J, Wolfenson H, Sheetz MP, Force-induced calpain cleavage of talin is critical for growth, adhesion development, and rigidity sensing. Nano Lett. 2017; 17:7242– 7251, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02476
-
[19]
Travers T, Shao H, Joughin BA, Lauffenburger DA, Wells A, Camacho CJ, Tandem phosphorylation within an intrinsically disordered region regulates ACTN4 function. Sci. Signal. 2015; 8:ra51, DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa1977
-
[20]
Calcium-stimulated disassembly of focal adhesions mediated by an ORP3/IQSec1 complex
D’Souza RS, Lim JY, Turgut A, Servage K, Zhang J, Orth K, Sosale NG, Lazzara MJ, Allegood J, Casanova JE. Calcium-stimulated disassembly of focal adhesions mediated by an ORP3/IQSec1 complex. eLife 2020; 9:e54113, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54113
-
[21]
Rizaner N, Onkal R, Fraser SP, Pristerá A, Okuse K, Djamgoz MBA. Intracellular calcium oscillations in strongly metastatic human breast and prostate cancer cells: control by voltage‑gated sodium channel activity. Eur Biophys J 2016; 45(7):735-748, doi: 10.1007/s00249- 016-1170-x
-
[22]
Liang C, Huang M, Li T, Li L, Sussman H, Dai Y, Siemann DW, Xie M, Tang X. Towards an integrative understanding of cancer mechanobiology: calcium, YAP, and microRNA under biophysical forces. Soft Matter 2022; 18:1112, DOI: 10.1039/d1sm01618k
-
[23]
Huang RY, Sheetz MP, Stopping transformed cancer cell growth by rigidity sensing
Yang B, Wolfenson H, Chung VY, Nakazawa N, Liu S, Hu J, R. Huang RY, Sheetz MP, Stopping transformed cancer cell growth by rigidity sensing. Nat. Mater. 2020; 19:239–250, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0507-0
-
[24]
Warmt E, Grosser S, Blauth E, Xie X, Kubitschke H, Stange R, Sauer F, Schnauß J, Tomm JM, von Bergen M, Käs JA. Differences in cortical contractile properties between healthy epithelial and cancerous mesenchymal breast cells. New J Phys. 2021; 23:103020, doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/ac254e
-
[25]
Ansardamavandi A, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Ali Shokrgozar M. Behavioral remodeling of normal and cancerous epithelial cell lines with differing invasion potential induced by substrate elastic modulus. Cell adhesion & migration 2018; 12(5):472–488, https://doi.org/10.1080/19336918.2018.1475803
-
[26]
Actin stress fibers—assembly, dynamics and biological roles
Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P. Actin stress fibers—assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 8):1855-1864, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.098087
-
[27]
Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells
Hotulainen P and Lappalainen P. Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J Cell Biol 2006; 173(3):383-94, doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511093
-
[28]
Isotropic actomyosin dynamics promote organization of the apical cell cortex in epithelial cells
Klingner C, Cherian AV, Fels J, Diesinger PM, Aufschnaiter R, Maghelli N, Keil T, Beck G, Tolid- Nørrelykke IM, Bathe M, Roland Wedlich-Soldner R. Isotropic actomyosin dynamics promote organization of the apical cell cortex in epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 2014; 207(1):107–121, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201402037
-
[29]
Myosin-II mediated traction forces evoke localized 31 Piezo1-dependent Ca²⁺ flickers
Ellefsen KL, Holt JR, Chang AC, Nourse JL, Arulmoli J, Mekhdjian AH, Abuwarda H, Tombola F, Flanagan LA, Dunn AR, Parker I, Pathak MM. Myosin-II mediated traction forces evoke localized 31 Piezo1-dependent Ca²⁺ flickers. Comm. Biol. 2019; 2:298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019- 0514-3
-
[30]
Yao M, Tijore A, Cheng D, Li JV, Hariharan A, Martinac B, Tran Van Nhieu G, Cox CD, Sheetz M. Force- and cell state–dependent recruitment of Piezo1 drives focal adhesion dynamics and calcium entry. Science Adv. 2022; 8(45):1461. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1461
-
[31]
Membrane curvature governs the distribution of Piezo1 in live cells
Yang S, Miao X, Arnold S, Li B, Ly AT, Wang H, Wang M, Guo X, Pathak MM, Zhao W, Cox CD, Shi Z. Membrane curvature governs the distribution of Piezo1 in live cells. Nature Comm. 2022; 13(1):7467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35034-6
-
[32]
Piezo1 as a force-through- membrane sensor in red blood cells
Vaisey G, Banerjee P, North AJ, Haselwandter CA, MacKinnon R. Piezo1 as a force-through- membrane sensor in red blood cells. eLife 2022; 11:e82621, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82621
-
[33]
Oakes PW, Beckham Y, Stricker J, Gardel MG. 2012. Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J. Cell Biol. 2012; 196(3):363–374, www.jcb.org/cgi/doi/10.1083/jcb.201107042
-
[34]
A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function
Kassianidou E and Kumar S. A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015; 1853:3065–3074, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.04.006
-
[35]
The inner workings of stress fibers −from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back
Livne A and Geiger B. The inner workings of stress fibers −from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J. Cell Sci. 2016; 129:1293-1304, doi:10.1242/jcs.180927
-
[36]
Verkest C, Roettger L, Zeitzschel N, Hall J, Sánchez-Carranza O, Huang AT-L, Lewin GR, Lechner S. G. (2025). Cluster nanoarchitecture and structural diversity of PIEZO1 at rest and during activation in intact cells. Science Adv. 2025; 11(43):eady8052, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ady8052
-
[37]
Actomyosin stress fiber subtypes have unique viscoelastic properties and roles in tension generation
Lee S, Kassianidou E, Kumar S. Actomyosin stress fiber subtypes have unique viscoelastic properties and roles in tension generation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2018; 29(16), 1992–2004, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0106
-
[38]
Lorenz C, Forsting J, Style RW, Klumpp S, Köster S. 2023. Keratin filament mechanics and energy dissipation are determined by metal-like plasticity. Matter 2023; 6(6):2019–2033, doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2023.04.014
-
[39]
Differential effect of actomyosin relaxation on the dynamic properties of focal adhesion proteins
Lavelin I, Wolfenson H, Patla I, Henis YI, Medalia O, Volberg T, Livne A, Kam Z., Geiger B. Differential effect of actomyosin relaxation on the dynamic properties of focal adhesion proteins. PLoS ONE 2013; 8:e73549, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090269
-
[40]
McKenzie AJ, Hicks SR, Svec KV, Naughton H, Edmunds ZL, Howe AK. The mechanical microenvironment regulates ovarian cancer cell morphology, migration, and spheroid disaggregation. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8:7228, DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25589-0
-
[41]
Comparative study of the dynamics of focal contacts in live epithelial and mesenchymal cells
Ozawa T and Tsuruta D. Comparative study of the dynamics of focal contacts in live epithelial and mesenchymal cells. Med Mol Morphol 2011; 44:27–33, DOI 10.1007/s00795-010-0502-7
-
[42]
Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength
Fuhrmann A, Banisadr A, Beri P, Tlsty TD, Engler AJ. Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength. Biophys. J. 2017; 112:736–745, DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.038
-
[43]
Morphological and cytoskeleton changes in cells after EMT
Nurmagambetova A, Mustyatsa V, Saidova A, Vorobjev I. Morphological and cytoskeleton changes in cells after EMT. Sci. Rep. 2023; 13:22164, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023- 48279-y. 32
-
[44]
Analysis of focal adhesion turnover: A quantitative live cell imaging example
Stehbens S and Wittmann T. Analysis of focal adhesion turnover: A quantitative live cell imaging example. Methods Cell Biol. 2014; 123:335–346, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00018-5
-
[45]
Has C, Sivadas P, Das SL. Insights into Membrane Curvature Sensing and Membrane Remodeling by Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Protein Regions. J. Membr. Biol. 2022; 255:237–259 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-022-00237-x
-
[46]
-Integrin-Mediated Adhesion Is Lipid-Bilayer Dependent
Son S, Moroney GJ, Butler PJ. -Integrin-Mediated Adhesion Is Lipid-Bilayer Dependent. Biophys. J. 2017; 113:1080–1092, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.010
-
[47]
Roles of Membrane Domains in Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion
Lietha D and Izard T. Roles of Membrane Domains in Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21:5531; doi:10.3390/ijms21155531
-
[48]
Curved adhesions mediate cell attachment to soft matrix fibres in three dimensions
Zhang W, Lu C-H, Nakamoto ML, Tsai C-T, Roy AR, Lee CE, Yang Y, Jahed Z, Li X, Cui B. Curved adhesions mediate cell attachment to soft matrix fibres in three dimensions. Nature Cell Biol. 2023; 25:1453–1464, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-023-01238-1
-
[49]
Differences in the Stress Fibers between Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells
Sanger JW, Sanger JM, Jockusch BM. Differences in the Stress Fibers between Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells. Cell Biol. 1983; 96:961‑969, DOI: 10.1083/jcb.96.4.961
-
[50]
Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension
Chugh P, Clark AG, Smith MB, Cassani DAD, Dierkes K, Ragab A, Roux PP, Charras G, Salbreux G, Paluch EK. Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. Nature Cell Biol. 2017; DOI: 10.1038/ncb3525
-
[51]
Actin Cell Cortex: Structure and Molecular Organization
Svitkina TM. Actin Cell Cortex: Structure and Molecular Organization. Trends Cell Biol. 2020; 30(7):556-565. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.03.005
-
[52]
PLOS ONE 2013; 8(2):e52554, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052554
Stirbat TV, Mgharbel A, Bodennec S, Ferri K, Mertani HC, Rieu JP, Delanoe¨-Ayari H: Fine Tuning of Tissues’ Viscosity and Surface Tension through Contractility Suggests a New Role for a- Catenin. PLOS ONE 2013; 8(2):e52554, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052554
-
[53]
Myosin I Contributes to the Generation of Resting Cortical Tension
Dai J, Ting-Beall HP, Hochmuth RM, Sheetz MP, Titus MA. Myosin I Contributes to the Generation of Resting Cortical Tension. Biophys J 1999; 77(2): 1168–1176, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76968-7
-
[54]
Miroshnikova YA, Le HQ, Schneider D, Thalheim T, Rübsam M, Bremicker N, Polleux J, Kamprad N, Tarantola M, Wang I et al.: Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nature Cell Biol. 2018; 20:69–80, DOI: 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z
-
[55]
Renormalization of the tension and area expansion modulus in fluid membranes
Marsh D. Renormalization of the tension and area expansion modulus in fluid membranes. Biophys. J. 1997; 73(2):865-869, doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78119-0
-
[56]
Bavi O, Cox CD, Vossoughi M, Naghdabadi R, Jamali Y, Martinac B. Influence of Global and Local Membrane Curvature on Mechanosensitive Ion Channels: A Finite Element Approach. Membranes 2016; 6:14, doi: 10.3390/membranes6010014
-
[57]
Thermocapillarity in Microfluidics—A Review
Karbalaei A, Kumar R, Cho HJ. Thermocapillarity in Microfluidics—A Review. Micromachines 2016; 7:13; doi:10.3390/mi7010013
-
[58]
Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, ed
Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, ed. Ames WF San Diego, London: Academic Press 1999; 198 pp. 78, ISBN 0 -1 2 S5H810 -2
1999
-
[59]
Peussa HM, Peltola S, Tervonen A, Lehtimäki S, Kauppila M, Bhati R, Fedele C, Tran H, Mäntylä E, Priimägi A, Ihalainen TO. Viscoelasticity driven deformation dynamics of the substrate affect mechanically induced Ca²⁺ signals. bioRxiv. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.07.687272. 33
-
[60]
Bilayer-Mediated Clustering and Functional Interaction of MscL Channels, Biophys
Grage SL, Keleshian AM, Turdzeladze T, Battle AR, Tay WC, May RP, Holt SA, Contera SA, Haertlein M, Moulin M, Pal P, Rohde PR, Forsyth VT, Watts A, Huang KC, Ulrich AS, Martinac B. Bilayer-Mediated Clustering and Functional Interaction of MscL Channels, Biophys. J. 2011; 100(5):1252-1260, doi: 10.1007/s00249-013-0925-x
-
[61]
What can stochastic resonance do? Nature 1998; 391(6665):344
Dykman MI and McClintock PVE. What can stochastic resonance do? Nature 1998; 391(6665):344. https://doi.org/10.1038/34812
-
[62]
Stochastic resonance in ion channels characterized by information theory
Goychuk I and Hänggi P. Stochastic resonance in ion channels characterized by information theory. Phys. Rev. E 2000; 61:4272,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4272
-
[63]
Stochastic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies
Schmid G, Goychuk I, Hänggi P. Stochastic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies. Europ. Lett. 2001; 56(1):22-28, DOI 10.1209/epl/i2001-00482-6
-
[64]
Investigation of size-dependent cell adhesion on nanostructured interfaces
Kuo CW, Chueh D-Y, Chen P. Investigation of size-dependent cell adhesion on nanostructured interfaces. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2014;12:54. doi:10.1186/s12951-014-0054-4
-
[65]
Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential
Kraning-Rush CM, Califano JP, Reinhart-King CA. Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e32572. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032572
-
[66]
Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks
Clark AG, Maitra A, Jacques C, Bergert M, Pérez-González C, Simon A, Lederer L, Diz-Muñoz A, Trepat X, Voituriez R, Matic-Vignjevic D. Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks. Nature Mater. 2022; 21:1200–1210, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41563- 022- 01259-5
2022
-
[67]
Sharma V, Adebowale K, Gong Z, Chaudhuri O, Shenoy VB. Glassy Adhesion Dynamics Govern Transitions Between Sub-Diffusive and Super-Diffusive Cell Migration on Viscoelastic Substrates. bioRxiv 2025; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.11.642113
-
[68]
Rother J, Noding H, Mey I, Janshoff A. Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open Biol. 2014; 4:140046, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.140046
-
[69]
Scaling the microrheology of living cells
Fabry B, Maksym GN, Butler JP, Glogauer M, Navajas D, Fredberg JJ. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Let. 2001; 87(14):148102-1-4, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.148102
-
[70]
Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy
Alcaraz J, Buscemi L, Grabulosa M, Trepat X, Fabry B, Farre R, Navajas D. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2003; 84:2071– 2079, DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75014-0
-
[71]
Viscoelastic deformation of lipid bilayer vesicles
Wu S-H, Sankhagowit A, Biswas R, Wu S, Povinelli ML, Malmstadt N. Viscoelastic deformation of lipid bilayer vesicles. Soft Matter 2015; 11:7385, DOI: 10.1039/c5sm01565k
-
[72]
Modeling analysis of the lipid bilayer-cytoskeleton coupling in erythrocyte membrane
Pajic-Lijakovic, I., Milivojevic, M. Modeling analysis of the lipid bilayer-cytoskeleton coupling in erythrocyte membrane. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2014; 13(5):1097-1104, DOI: 10.1007/s10237-014-0559-7
-
[73]
Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement Caused by Coupling with the Lipid Bilayer-Modeling Considerations
Pajic-Lijakovic I and Milivojevic M. Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement Caused by Coupling with the Lipid Bilayer-Modeling Considerations. J. Membr. Biol. 2015; 248(2):337-47, doi: 10.1007/s00232-015-9775-z
-
[74]
Cholesterol Stiffening of Lipid Membranes
Doole FT, Kumarage T, Ashkar R, Brown MF. Cholesterol Stiffening of Lipid Membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 2022; 255:385–405, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-022-00263-9. 34
-
[75]
Piezo1 Forms Specific, Functionally Important Interactions with Phosphoinositides and Cholesterol
Buyan A, Cox CD, Barnoud J, Li J, Chan HSM, Martinac B, Marrink SJ, Corry B. Piezo1 Forms Specific, Functionally Important Interactions with Phosphoinositides and Cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2020; 119:1683–1697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.043
-
[76]
Modeling of full-length Piezo1 suggests importance of the proximal N-terminus for dome structure
Chong J, De Vecchis D, Hyman AJ, Povstyan OV, Ludlow MJ, Jian Shi J, Beech DJ, Kalli AC. Modeling of full-length Piezo1 suggests importance of the proximal N-terminus for dome structure. Biophys. J. 2021; 120:1343–1356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.003
-
[77]
McClatchey AI. ERM proteins at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2014; 127(Pt 15):3199-204. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098343
-
[78]
Piezo1 Channels Are Inherently Mechanosensitive, Cell Rep
Syeda R, Florendo MN, Cox CD, Kefauver JM, Santos JS, Martinac B, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 Channels Are Inherently Mechanosensitive, Cell Rep. 2016; 17(7): 1739-1746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.033
-
[79]
Cox C, Bae C, Ziegler L, Hartley S, Nikolova-Krstevski V, Rohde PR, Ng CA, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA, Martinac B. Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10366, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10366
-
[80]
Hamidi H. and Ivaska J. (2018). Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nature Rev. Cancer 2018; 18(9):533–548, DOI: 10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.