pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05556 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🧬 q-bio.CB

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Marangoni-Driven Redistribution and Activity of Piezo1 Molecules in Epithelial and Cancer Cells

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.CB
keywords Piezo1Marangoni effectfocal adhesionsepithelial cellscancer cellsmechanosensingcell migrationmembrane tension
0
0 comments X

The pith

Marangoni surface flows drive Piezo1 clustering near focal adhesions in epithelial cells while cancer cells maintain uniform high-activity distribution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This theoretical study links the Marangoni effect to the observed redistribution of Piezo1 mechanosensitive channels in migrating cells. In epithelial cells, surface tension gradients cause Piezo1 to group around focal adhesions in a contractility-dependent way, whereas cancer cells show even distribution and elevated activity set by a different driving force. Membrane-mediated interactions among the clustered channels further modulate their function and correlate with calcium levels. A sympathetic reader would care because these physical mechanisms could explain differences in mechanosensing between normal and invasive cells without invoking purely biochemical regulation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that inhomogeneous Piezo1 distribution in epithelial cells arises from Marangoni-driven flows generated by actomyosin-induced tension gradients, concentrating channels near focal adhesions where membrane interactions then influence their activity; in cancer cells a distinct driving force produces uniform distribution together with higher expression and activity that tracks intracellular calcium.

What carries the argument

The Marangoni effect on the cell membrane, in which surface tension gradients induce tangential flows that advect Piezo1 molecules and thereby create inhomogeneous distributions modulated by focal adhesion proximity and contractility.

If this is right

  • Lowering actomyosin contractility produces more uniform Piezo1 distribution in epithelial cells.
  • Cancer-cell Piezo1 activity remains higher and uniform because its driving force differs from the epithelial case.
  • Membrane interactions among Piezo1 molecules near focal adhesions reduce or enhance their collective activity depending on local density.
  • Piezo1 activity tracks intracellular calcium concentration in both cell types.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model suggests experiments that locally alter membrane tension gradients to test whether Piezo1 clustering can be prevented or induced on demand.
  • Similar Marangoni-like redistribution may operate in other mechanically active cells such as fibroblasts or immune cells during migration.
  • If the driving-force difference is confirmed, it could point to membrane-tension interventions that selectively dampen Piezo1 activity in cancer cells without affecting normal epithelial behavior.

Load-bearing premise

That Marangoni-driven flows and membrane-mediated interactions are the dominant physical mechanisms controlling Piezo1 placement and function, with the model capturing the key biology without needing cell-specific parameter tuning.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing that imposed surface-tension gradients fail to alter Piezo1 spatial distribution in epithelial cells while leaving focal-adhesion contractility unchanged.

read the original abstract

The activity and distribution of Piezo1 molecules, along with the maturity and strength of focal adhesions (FAs), serve as critical factors influencing cell mechanosensing. Notably, migrating epithelial cells and mesenchymal-like cancer cells exhibit significantly different behaviors regarding these elements. In cancer cells, Piezo1 molecules are distributed uniformly, while in epithelial cells, their distribution is heterogeneous. In epithelial cells, Piezo1 molecules tend to group around FAs, a phenomenon that is enhanced by actomyosin contractility. However, a reduction in contractility results in a more uniform distribution of Piezo1 molecules. The expression and activity levels of Piezo1 molecules are markedly higher in cancer cells compared to epithelial cells. The activity of Piezo1 molecules correlates with the intracellular calcium concentration. Despite the extensive experimental studies on the properties of migrating epithelial and mesenchymal-like cancer cells, the physical explanations remain lacking. The primary objective of this theoretical study is to explore: (i) the inhomogeneous distribution of Piezo1 molecules in epithelial cells in relation to the Marangoni effect, (ii) the heightened activity of Piezo1 molecules in cancer cells by specifying the driving force, and (iii) the influence of membrane-mediated interactions among Piezo1 molecules grouped near FAs in epithelial cells on their activity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical exploration of Piezo1 distribution and activity differences between migrating epithelial cells (heterogeneous Piezo1 clustering near focal adhesions, contractility-dependent) and mesenchymal-like cancer cells (uniform distribution, higher expression/activity correlated with calcium). It posits that the Marangoni effect from surface-tension gradients drives the inhomogeneous redistribution in epithelial cells, a distinct driving force explains cancer-cell uniformity and elevated activity, and membrane-mediated interactions among clustered Piezo1 molecules modulate activity near FAs.

Significance. If a complete, parameter-controlled model were provided and shown to reproduce the heterogeneous-to-uniform transition and activity differences without hidden fitting, the work could supply a hydrodynamic mechanism linking membrane mechanics to mechanosensing and cell-type behaviors. This might motivate targeted experiments on surface-tension gradients in live cells. At present, the absence of any derivations, governing equations, or validation leaves the physical explanation untestable and non-unique relative to known active trafficking processes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the stated objectives for a 'theoretical study' are not accompanied by any governing equations, boundary conditions, or simulation results for the Marangoni flow, surface-tension gradient, or Piezo1 density evolution; without these it is impossible to verify whether the model reproduces the contractility-dependent redistribution or the activity difference as claimed.
  2. [Abstract] The central claim that Marangoni-driven passive redistribution dominates the observed patterns requires demonstration that a single-parameter hydrodynamic model captures both the epithelial clustering and the cancer-cell uniformity without additional terms for endocytosis, actomyosin anchoring, or lipid partitioning; the manuscript provides no such derivation or comparison.
  3. [Abstract] No parameter values, free-energy functional, or interaction potential for the membrane-mediated Piezo1 interactions near FAs are supplied, so the assertion that these interactions influence activity cannot be assessed for internal consistency or predictive power.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is clear on experimental observations but would benefit from a brief statement of the mathematical approach even at this stage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the current version, which primarily outlines the theoretical objectives, would be strengthened by explicit mathematical details. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested derivations, governing equations, parameter values, and comparisons. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated objectives for a 'theoretical study' are not accompanied by any governing equations, boundary conditions, or simulation results for the Marangoni flow, surface-tension gradient, or Piezo1 density evolution; without these it is impossible to verify whether the model reproduces the contractility-dependent redistribution or the activity difference as claimed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and current manuscript text do not include these elements. In the revised version we will add a dedicated methods section presenting the full set of governing equations for the membrane hydrodynamics (including the Marangoni stress term arising from local surface-tension gradients), the advection-diffusion equation for Piezo1 density evolution, appropriate boundary conditions at focal adhesions, and representative numerical results that demonstrate contractility-dependent clustering. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that Marangoni-driven passive redistribution dominates the observed patterns requires demonstration that a single-parameter hydrodynamic model captures both the epithelial clustering and the cancer-cell uniformity without additional terms for endocytosis, actomyosin anchoring, or lipid partitioning; the manuscript provides no such derivation or comparison.

    Authors: We accept that such a demonstration is necessary and is currently absent. In the revision we will supply an explicit derivation showing how a hydrodynamic model driven solely by a Marangoni stress (parameterized by a single coefficient reflecting Piezo1-induced tension gradients) produces the heterogeneous-to-uniform transition when contractility is varied, and we will include a brief comparison indicating why this passive mechanism is sufficient in the regimes considered without invoking the additional active processes mentioned. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] No parameter values, free-energy functional, or interaction potential for the membrane-mediated Piezo1 interactions near FAs are supplied, so the assertion that these interactions influence activity cannot be assessed for internal consistency or predictive power.

    Authors: We agree that the lack of these specifics prevents quantitative assessment. The revised manuscript will define the membrane-mediated interaction via an explicit short-range attractive potential (derived from lipid packing energetics), state the corresponding free-energy functional that couples to local bending and tension, and provide order-of-magnitude parameter estimates drawn from the literature together with the resulting effect on local Piezo1 activity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model objectives stated without self-referential derivations or fitted predictions shown

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a theoretical exploration linking Piezo1 distribution to the Marangoni effect and activity differences to driving forces and membrane interactions, but contain no equations, parameter-fitting procedures, self-citations, or derivation steps that reduce predictions to inputs by construction. No load-bearing claims are shown to be equivalent to their own assumptions or prior self-references. The derivation chain cannot be walked for circularity because no specific mathematical reductions or ansatzes are exhibited in the text. This is the expected non-finding for an abstract-only view of a modeling paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on applying fluid dynamics concepts to cell membranes; specific free parameters such as surface tension gradients or interaction strengths are likely introduced but not detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • Marangoni coefficient or equivalent surface tension gradient parameter
    Likely fitted or chosen to match observed Piezo1 clustering in epithelial cells under varying contractility.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Marangoni effect governs flows in cell membranes affecting protein distribution
    Invoked to explain inhomogeneous Piezo1 distribution in epithelial cells.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5552 in / 1257 out tokens · 52965 ms · 2026-05-10T19:17:40.181841+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Acoustic Platform for Single‐Cell, High‐ Throughput Measurements of the Viscoelastic Properties of Cells

    Romanov V, Silvani G, Zhu H, Cox DC, Martinac B. An Acoustic Platform for Single‐Cell, High‐ Throughput Measurements of the Viscoelastic Properties of Cells. Small 2020; 17:2005759, DOI: 10.1002/smll.202005759

  2. [2]

    Doss LB, Lima CT, Sheetza M

    Tijore A, Yao M, Wang YH, Hariharan A, Nematbakhsh Y, B. Doss LB, Lima CT, Sheetza M. Selective killing of transformed cells by mechanical stretch, Biomaterials 2021; 275:120866. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120866

  3. [3]

    Cancer cells can be killed mechanically or with combinations of cytoskeletal inhibitors

    Tijore A, Yang B, Sheetz M. Cancer cells can be killed mechanically or with combinations of cytoskeletal inhibitors. Front. Pharmacol. 2022; 13:955595, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.955595

  4. [4]

    Targeted elimination of mesenchymal-like cancer cells through cyclic stretch activation of Piezo1 channels: the physical aspects

    Pajic-Lijakovic I, Milivojevic M, Martinac B, McClintock PVE. Targeted elimination of mesenchymal-like cancer cells through cyclic stretch activation of Piezo1 channels: the physical aspects. Biophys. Rev. 2025; 847–865, DOI: 10.1007/s12551-025-01304-y

  5. [5]

    Adjustable viscoelasticity allows for efficient collective cell migration

    Barriga EH and Mayor R. Adjustable viscoelasticity allows for efficient collective cell migration. Sem. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019; 93:55-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.05.027

  6. [6]

    Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity

    Guo YR and MacKinnon R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife 2017; 6:e33660, doi: 10.7554/eLife.33660

  7. [7]

    Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1

    Saotome K, Murthy SE, Kefauver JM, Whitwam T, Patapoutian A, Ward AB. Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature 2018; 554(7693): 481-486, DOI: 10.1038/nature25453

  8. [8]

    Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization impairs the activity of PIEZO1 channel clusters

    Ridone P, Pandzic E, Vassalli M, Cox CD, Macmillan A, Gottlieb PA, Martinac B. Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization impairs the activity of PIEZO1 channel clusters. J. Gen. Physiol. 2019; 152(8):e201912515, DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201912515

  9. [9]

    Channeling the Force: Piezo1 Mechanotransduction in Cancer Metastasis

    Dombroski JA, Hope JM, Sarna NS, King MR. Channeling the Force: Piezo1 Mechanotransduction in Cancer Metastasis. Cells 2021; 10:2815, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112815

  10. [10]

    Structure deformation and curvature sensing of PIEZO1 in lipid membranes

    Yang X, Lin C, Chen X, Li S, Li X, Xiao B. Structure deformation and curvature sensing of PIEZO1 in lipid membranes. Nature 2022; 604:377–383, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04574-8

  11. [11]

    Direct observation of the conformational states of PIEZO1

    Mulhall EM, Gharpure A, Lee RM, Dubin AE, Aaron JS, Marshall KL, Spencer KR, Reiche MA, Henderson SC, Chew T-L, Patapoutian A. Direct observation of the conformational states of PIEZO1. Nature 2023; 620:1117–1125, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06427-4

  12. [12]

    Piezo1 regulates migration and invasion of breast cancer cells via modulating cell mechanobiological properties

    Yu Y, Wu X, Liu S, Zhao H, Li B, Zhao H, Feng X. Piezo1 regulates migration and invasion of breast cancer cells via modulating cell mechanobiological properties. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53(1), 10–18, doi:10.1093/abbs/gmaa112

  13. [13]

    Mechanosensitive ion channels in apoptosis and ferroptosis: focusing on the role of Piezo1

    Kim Y-J and Hyun J. Mechanosensitive ion channels in apoptosis and ferroptosis: focusing on the role of Piezo1. BMB Rep. 2023; 56(3):145-152, https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2023-0002

  14. [14]

    Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1) in human cancer

    Yu J-L and Liao H-Y. Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1) in human cancer. Biomed. & Pharmacol. 2021; 140:111692, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111692

  15. [15]

    Regulation of focal complex composition and disassembly by the calcium-dependent protease calpain

    Bhatt A, Kaverina I, Otey C, Huttenlocher A. Regulation of focal complex composition and disassembly by the calcium-dependent protease calpain. J. Cell Sci. 2002; 115:3415–3425, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115.17.3415. 30

  16. [16]

    Calpain- mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics

    Franco SJ, Rodgers MA, Perrin BJ, Han J, Bennin DA, Critchley DR, Huttenlocher A. Calpain- mediated proteolysis of talin regulates adhesion dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004; 6:977–983, DOI: 10.1038/ncb1175

  17. [17]

    Franco SJ, Regulating cell migration: Calpains make the cut. J. Cell Sci. 2005; 118:3829–3838, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02562

  18. [18]

    Nano Lett

    Saxena M, Changede R, Hone J, Wolfenson H, Sheetz MP, Force-induced calpain cleavage of talin is critical for growth, adhesion development, and rigidity sensing. Nano Lett. 2017; 17:7242– 7251, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02476

  19. [19]

    Travers T, Shao H, Joughin BA, Lauffenburger DA, Wells A, Camacho CJ, Tandem phosphorylation within an intrinsically disordered region regulates ACTN4 function. Sci. Signal. 2015; 8:ra51, DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa1977

  20. [20]

    Calcium-stimulated disassembly of focal adhesions mediated by an ORP3/IQSec1 complex

    D’Souza RS, Lim JY, Turgut A, Servage K, Zhang J, Orth K, Sosale NG, Lazzara MJ, Allegood J, Casanova JE. Calcium-stimulated disassembly of focal adhesions mediated by an ORP3/IQSec1 complex. eLife 2020; 9:e54113, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54113

  21. [21]

    Intracellular calcium oscillations in strongly metastatic human breast and prostate cancer cells: control by voltage‑gated sodium channel activity

    Rizaner N, Onkal R, Fraser SP, Pristerá A, Okuse K, Djamgoz MBA. Intracellular calcium oscillations in strongly metastatic human breast and prostate cancer cells: control by voltage‑gated sodium channel activity. Eur Biophys J 2016; 45(7):735-748, doi: 10.1007/s00249- 016-1170-x

  22. [22]

    Towards an integrative understanding of cancer mechanobiology: calcium, YAP, and microRNA under biophysical forces

    Liang C, Huang M, Li T, Li L, Sussman H, Dai Y, Siemann DW, Xie M, Tang X. Towards an integrative understanding of cancer mechanobiology: calcium, YAP, and microRNA under biophysical forces. Soft Matter 2022; 18:1112, DOI: 10.1039/d1sm01618k

  23. [23]

    Huang RY, Sheetz MP, Stopping transformed cancer cell growth by rigidity sensing

    Yang B, Wolfenson H, Chung VY, Nakazawa N, Liu S, Hu J, R. Huang RY, Sheetz MP, Stopping transformed cancer cell growth by rigidity sensing. Nat. Mater. 2020; 19:239–250, DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0507-0

  24. [24]

    The space of logically consistent classical processes withoutcausalorder.New Journal of Physics, 18(1):013036, 2016

    Warmt E, Grosser S, Blauth E, Xie X, Kubitschke H, Stange R, Sauer F, Schnauß J, Tomm JM, von Bergen M, Käs JA. Differences in cortical contractile properties between healthy epithelial and cancerous mesenchymal breast cells. New J Phys. 2021; 23:103020, doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/ac254e

  25. [25]

    Behavioral remodeling of normal and cancerous epithelial cell lines with differing invasion potential induced by substrate elastic modulus

    Ansardamavandi A, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Ali Shokrgozar M. Behavioral remodeling of normal and cancerous epithelial cell lines with differing invasion potential induced by substrate elastic modulus. Cell adhesion & migration 2018; 12(5):472–488, https://doi.org/10.1080/19336918.2018.1475803

  26. [26]

    Actin stress fibers—assembly, dynamics and biological roles

    Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P. Actin stress fibers—assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 8):1855-1864, DOI: 10.1242/jcs.098087

  27. [27]

    Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells

    Hotulainen P and Lappalainen P. Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J Cell Biol 2006; 173(3):383-94, doi: 10.1083/jcb.200511093

  28. [28]

    Isotropic actomyosin dynamics promote organization of the apical cell cortex in epithelial cells

    Klingner C, Cherian AV, Fels J, Diesinger PM, Aufschnaiter R, Maghelli N, Keil T, Beck G, Tolid- Nørrelykke IM, Bathe M, Roland Wedlich-Soldner R. Isotropic actomyosin dynamics promote organization of the apical cell cortex in epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 2014; 207(1):107–121, doi: 10.1083/jcb.201402037

  29. [29]

    Myosin-II mediated traction forces evoke localized 31 Piezo1-dependent Ca²⁺ flickers

    Ellefsen KL, Holt JR, Chang AC, Nourse JL, Arulmoli J, Mekhdjian AH, Abuwarda H, Tombola F, Flanagan LA, Dunn AR, Parker I, Pathak MM. Myosin-II mediated traction forces evoke localized 31 Piezo1-dependent Ca²⁺ flickers. Comm. Biol. 2019; 2:298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019- 0514-3

  30. [30]

    Force- and cell state–dependent recruitment of Piezo1 drives focal adhesion dynamics and calcium entry

    Yao M, Tijore A, Cheng D, Li JV, Hariharan A, Martinac B, Tran Van Nhieu G, Cox CD, Sheetz M. Force- and cell state–dependent recruitment of Piezo1 drives focal adhesion dynamics and calcium entry. Science Adv. 2022; 8(45):1461. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1461

  31. [31]

    Membrane curvature governs the distribution of Piezo1 in live cells

    Yang S, Miao X, Arnold S, Li B, Ly AT, Wang H, Wang M, Guo X, Pathak MM, Zhao W, Cox CD, Shi Z. Membrane curvature governs the distribution of Piezo1 in live cells. Nature Comm. 2022; 13(1):7467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35034-6

  32. [32]

    Piezo1 as a force-through- membrane sensor in red blood cells

    Vaisey G, Banerjee P, North AJ, Haselwandter CA, MacKinnon R. Piezo1 as a force-through- membrane sensor in red blood cells. eLife 2022; 11:e82621, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82621

  33. [33]

    Oakes PW, Beckham Y, Stricker J, Gardel MG. 2012. Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J. Cell Biol. 2012; 196(3):363–374, www.jcb.org/cgi/doi/10.1083/jcb.201107042

  34. [34]

    A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function

    Kassianidou E and Kumar S. A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015; 1853:3065–3074, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.04.006

  35. [35]

    The inner workings of stress fibers −from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back

    Livne A and Geiger B. The inner workings of stress fibers −from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J. Cell Sci. 2016; 129:1293-1304, doi:10.1242/jcs.180927

  36. [36]

    Verkest C, Roettger L, Zeitzschel N, Hall J, Sánchez-Carranza O, Huang AT-L, Lewin GR, Lechner S. G. (2025). Cluster nanoarchitecture and structural diversity of PIEZO1 at rest and during activation in intact cells. Science Adv. 2025; 11(43):eady8052, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ady8052

  37. [37]

    Actomyosin stress fiber subtypes have unique viscoelastic properties and roles in tension generation

    Lee S, Kassianidou E, Kumar S. Actomyosin stress fiber subtypes have unique viscoelastic properties and roles in tension generation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2018; 29(16), 1992–2004, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-02-0106

  38. [38]

    Lorenz C, Forsting J, Style RW, Klumpp S, Köster S. 2023. Keratin filament mechanics and energy dissipation are determined by metal-like plasticity. Matter 2023; 6(6):2019–2033, doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2023.04.014

  39. [39]

    Differential effect of actomyosin relaxation on the dynamic properties of focal adhesion proteins

    Lavelin I, Wolfenson H, Patla I, Henis YI, Medalia O, Volberg T, Livne A, Kam Z., Geiger B. Differential effect of actomyosin relaxation on the dynamic properties of focal adhesion proteins. PLoS ONE 2013; 8:e73549, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090269

  40. [40]

    The mechanical microenvironment regulates ovarian cancer cell morphology, migration, and spheroid disaggregation

    McKenzie AJ, Hicks SR, Svec KV, Naughton H, Edmunds ZL, Howe AK. The mechanical microenvironment regulates ovarian cancer cell morphology, migration, and spheroid disaggregation. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8:7228, DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25589-0

  41. [41]

    Comparative study of the dynamics of focal contacts in live epithelial and mesenchymal cells

    Ozawa T and Tsuruta D. Comparative study of the dynamics of focal contacts in live epithelial and mesenchymal cells. Med Mol Morphol 2011; 44:27–33, DOI 10.1007/s00795-010-0502-7

  42. [42]

    Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength

    Fuhrmann A, Banisadr A, Beri P, Tlsty TD, Engler AJ. Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength. Biophys. J. 2017; 112:736–745, DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.038

  43. [43]

    Morphological and cytoskeleton changes in cells after EMT

    Nurmagambetova A, Mustyatsa V, Saidova A, Vorobjev I. Morphological and cytoskeleton changes in cells after EMT. Sci. Rep. 2023; 13:22164, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023- 48279-y. 32

  44. [44]

    Analysis of focal adhesion turnover: A quantitative live cell imaging example

    Stehbens S and Wittmann T. Analysis of focal adhesion turnover: A quantitative live cell imaging example. Methods Cell Biol. 2014; 123:335–346, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00018-5

  45. [45]

    Insights into Membrane Curvature Sensing and Membrane Remodeling by Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Protein Regions

    Has C, Sivadas P, Das SL. Insights into Membrane Curvature Sensing and Membrane Remodeling by Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Protein Regions. J. Membr. Biol. 2022; 255:237–259 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-022-00237-x

  46. [46]

    -Integrin-Mediated Adhesion Is Lipid-Bilayer Dependent

    Son S, Moroney GJ, Butler PJ. -Integrin-Mediated Adhesion Is Lipid-Bilayer Dependent. Biophys. J. 2017; 113:1080–1092, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.010

  47. [47]

    Roles of Membrane Domains in Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion

    Lietha D and Izard T. Roles of Membrane Domains in Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21:5531; doi:10.3390/ijms21155531

  48. [48]

    Curved adhesions mediate cell attachment to soft matrix fibres in three dimensions

    Zhang W, Lu C-H, Nakamoto ML, Tsai C-T, Roy AR, Lee CE, Yang Y, Jahed Z, Li X, Cui B. Curved adhesions mediate cell attachment to soft matrix fibres in three dimensions. Nature Cell Biol. 2023; 25:1453–1464, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-023-01238-1

  49. [49]

    Differences in the Stress Fibers between Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells

    Sanger JW, Sanger JM, Jockusch BM. Differences in the Stress Fibers between Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells. Cell Biol. 1983; 96:961‑969, DOI: 10.1083/jcb.96.4.961

  50. [50]

    Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension

    Chugh P, Clark AG, Smith MB, Cassani DAD, Dierkes K, Ragab A, Roux PP, Charras G, Salbreux G, Paluch EK. Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. Nature Cell Biol. 2017; DOI: 10.1038/ncb3525

  51. [51]

    Actin Cell Cortex: Structure and Molecular Organization

    Svitkina TM. Actin Cell Cortex: Structure and Molecular Organization. Trends Cell Biol. 2020; 30(7):556-565. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.03.005

  52. [52]

    PLOS ONE 2013; 8(2):e52554, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052554

    Stirbat TV, Mgharbel A, Bodennec S, Ferri K, Mertani HC, Rieu JP, Delanoe¨-Ayari H: Fine Tuning of Tissues’ Viscosity and Surface Tension through Contractility Suggests a New Role for a- Catenin. PLOS ONE 2013; 8(2):e52554, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052554

  53. [53]

    Myosin I Contributes to the Generation of Resting Cortical Tension

    Dai J, Ting-Beall HP, Hochmuth RM, Sheetz MP, Titus MA. Myosin I Contributes to the Generation of Resting Cortical Tension. Biophys J 1999; 77(2): 1168–1176, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76968-7

  54. [54]

    Nature Cell Biol

    Miroshnikova YA, Le HQ, Schneider D, Thalheim T, Rübsam M, Bremicker N, Polleux J, Kamprad N, Tarantola M, Wang I et al.: Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nature Cell Biol. 2018; 20:69–80, DOI: 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z

  55. [55]

    Renormalization of the tension and area expansion modulus in fluid membranes

    Marsh D. Renormalization of the tension and area expansion modulus in fluid membranes. Biophys. J. 1997; 73(2):865-869, doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78119-0

  56. [56]

    Influence of Global and Local Membrane Curvature on Mechanosensitive Ion Channels: A Finite Element Approach

    Bavi O, Cox CD, Vossoughi M, Naghdabadi R, Jamali Y, Martinac B. Influence of Global and Local Membrane Curvature on Mechanosensitive Ion Channels: A Finite Element Approach. Membranes 2016; 6:14, doi: 10.3390/membranes6010014

  57. [57]

    Thermocapillarity in Microfluidics—A Review

    Karbalaei A, Kumar R, Cho HJ. Thermocapillarity in Microfluidics—A Review. Micromachines 2016; 7:13; doi:10.3390/mi7010013

  58. [58]

    Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, ed

    Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, ed. Ames WF San Diego, London: Academic Press 1999; 198 pp. 78, ISBN 0 -1 2 S5H810 -2

  59. [59]

    Viscoelasticity driven deformation dynamics of the substrate affect mechanically induced Ca²⁺ signals

    Peussa HM, Peltola S, Tervonen A, Lehtimäki S, Kauppila M, Bhati R, Fedele C, Tran H, Mäntylä E, Priimägi A, Ihalainen TO. Viscoelasticity driven deformation dynamics of the substrate affect mechanically induced Ca²⁺ signals. bioRxiv. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.07.687272. 33

  60. [60]

    Bilayer-Mediated Clustering and Functional Interaction of MscL Channels, Biophys

    Grage SL, Keleshian AM, Turdzeladze T, Battle AR, Tay WC, May RP, Holt SA, Contera SA, Haertlein M, Moulin M, Pal P, Rohde PR, Forsyth VT, Watts A, Huang KC, Ulrich AS, Martinac B. Bilayer-Mediated Clustering and Functional Interaction of MscL Channels, Biophys. J. 2011; 100(5):1252-1260, doi: 10.1007/s00249-013-0925-x

  61. [61]

    What can stochastic resonance do? Nature 1998; 391(6665):344

    Dykman MI and McClintock PVE. What can stochastic resonance do? Nature 1998; 391(6665):344. https://doi.org/10.1038/34812

  62. [62]

    Stochastic resonance in ion channels characterized by information theory

    Goychuk I and Hänggi P. Stochastic resonance in ion channels characterized by information theory. Phys. Rev. E 2000; 61:4272,DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4272

  63. [63]

    Stochastic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies

    Schmid G, Goychuk I, Hänggi P. Stochastic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies. Europ. Lett. 2001; 56(1):22-28, DOI 10.1209/epl/i2001-00482-6

  64. [64]

    Investigation of size-dependent cell adhesion on nanostructured interfaces

    Kuo CW, Chueh D-Y, Chen P. Investigation of size-dependent cell adhesion on nanostructured interfaces. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2014;12:54. doi:10.1186/s12951-014-0054-4

  65. [65]

    Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential

    Kraning-Rush CM, Califano JP, Reinhart-King CA. Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e32572. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032572

  66. [66]

    Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks

    Clark AG, Maitra A, Jacques C, Bergert M, Pérez-González C, Simon A, Lederer L, Diz-Muñoz A, Trepat X, Voituriez R, Matic-Vignjevic D. Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks. Nature Mater. 2022; 21:1200–1210, https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41563- 022- 01259-5

  67. [67]

    Glassy Adhesion Dynamics Govern Transitions Between Sub-Diffusive and Super-Diffusive Cell Migration on Viscoelastic Substrates

    Sharma V, Adebowale K, Gong Z, Chaudhuri O, Shenoy VB. Glassy Adhesion Dynamics Govern Transitions Between Sub-Diffusive and Super-Diffusive Cell Migration on Viscoelastic Substrates. bioRxiv 2025; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.11.642113

  68. [68]

    Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines

    Rother J, Noding H, Mey I, Janshoff A. Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open Biol. 2014; 4:140046, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.140046

  69. [69]

    Scaling the microrheology of living cells

    Fabry B, Maksym GN, Butler JP, Glogauer M, Navajas D, Fredberg JJ. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Let. 2001; 87(14):148102-1-4, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.148102

  70. [70]

    Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy

    Alcaraz J, Buscemi L, Grabulosa M, Trepat X, Fabry B, Farre R, Navajas D. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2003; 84:2071– 2079, DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75014-0

  71. [71]

    Viscoelastic deformation of lipid bilayer vesicles

    Wu S-H, Sankhagowit A, Biswas R, Wu S, Povinelli ML, Malmstadt N. Viscoelastic deformation of lipid bilayer vesicles. Soft Matter 2015; 11:7385, DOI: 10.1039/c5sm01565k

  72. [72]

    Modeling analysis of the lipid bilayer-cytoskeleton coupling in erythrocyte membrane

    Pajic-Lijakovic, I., Milivojevic, M. Modeling analysis of the lipid bilayer-cytoskeleton coupling in erythrocyte membrane. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2014; 13(5):1097-1104, DOI: 10.1007/s10237-014-0559-7

  73. [73]

    Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement Caused by Coupling with the Lipid Bilayer-Modeling Considerations

    Pajic-Lijakovic I and Milivojevic M. Actin Cytoskeleton Rearrangement Caused by Coupling with the Lipid Bilayer-Modeling Considerations. J. Membr. Biol. 2015; 248(2):337-47, doi: 10.1007/s00232-015-9775-z

  74. [74]

    Cholesterol Stiffening of Lipid Membranes

    Doole FT, Kumarage T, Ashkar R, Brown MF. Cholesterol Stiffening of Lipid Membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 2022; 255:385–405, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-022-00263-9. 34

  75. [75]

    Piezo1 Forms Specific, Functionally Important Interactions with Phosphoinositides and Cholesterol

    Buyan A, Cox CD, Barnoud J, Li J, Chan HSM, Martinac B, Marrink SJ, Corry B. Piezo1 Forms Specific, Functionally Important Interactions with Phosphoinositides and Cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2020; 119:1683–1697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.043

  76. [76]

    Modeling of full-length Piezo1 suggests importance of the proximal N-terminus for dome structure

    Chong J, De Vecchis D, Hyman AJ, Povstyan OV, Ludlow MJ, Jian Shi J, Beech DJ, Kalli AC. Modeling of full-length Piezo1 suggests importance of the proximal N-terminus for dome structure. Biophys. J. 2021; 120:1343–1356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.003

  77. [77]

    ERM proteins at a glance

    McClatchey AI. ERM proteins at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2014; 127(Pt 15):3199-204. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098343

  78. [78]

    Piezo1 Channels Are Inherently Mechanosensitive, Cell Rep

    Syeda R, Florendo MN, Cox CD, Kefauver JM, Santos JS, Martinac B, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 Channels Are Inherently Mechanosensitive, Cell Rep. 2016; 17(7): 1739-1746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.033

  79. [79]

    Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension

    Cox C, Bae C, Ziegler L, Hartley S, Nikolova-Krstevski V, Rohde PR, Ng CA, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA, Martinac B. Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10366, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10366

  80. [80]

    and Ivaska J

    Hamidi H. and Ivaska J. (2018). Every step of the way: integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nature Rev. Cancer 2018; 18(9):533–548, DOI: 10.1038/s41568-018-0038-z

Showing first 80 references.