pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05592 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.class-ph· physics.flu-dyn

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Taylor dispersion in a soft channel

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.class-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords Taylor dispersionsoft channelWinkler responsesolutal transportmicrofluidicseffective dispersionaxisymmetric channelpulsatile flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Softness of channel walls increases both the effective advection velocity and the dispersion coefficient of solutes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theory for how solutes disperse in a channel whose walls are soft and deform under pressure. It uses multiple-time-scale analysis to derive the effective transport equation for the solute concentration. The key result is that this softness boosts both the average speed at which the solute is carried along the channel and the rate at which it spreads out. This matters for microfluidic devices and biological systems where channels are often flexible rather than rigid.

Core claim

In a soft axisymmetric channel where walls deform linearly with local pressure according to the Winkler model, the effective advection velocity and dispersion coefficient for solutal transport are both enhanced compared to a rigid channel, as derived from the modified macro-transport equation obtained via multiple-time-scale analysis, for both steady and pulsatile flows.

What carries the argument

The Winkler response, a linear local deformation of the channel wall proportional to the hydrodynamic pressure, which modifies the flow profile and thereby increases solutal advection and dispersion.

Load-bearing premise

The channel walls deform instantaneously and locally in direct proportion to the pressure without inertia, bending stiffness, or effects from neighboring regions.

What would settle it

Measure the effective dispersion coefficient in a soft-walled microfluidic channel under known pressure-driven flow and compare it to the rigid-channel prediction; a significant increase would support the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05592 by Aditya Jha (LOMA), Joshua D Mcgraw, Masoodah Gunny, Thomas Salez (LOMA), Yacine Amarouchene (LOMA).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic of the system under study. We consider a flow of a viscous fluid, with viscosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Dimensionless amplification factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Numerically-computed values of the two dimensionless factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: a) Numerically-computed value of the solutal-dispersion enhancement factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Dimensionless solute concentration profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Diffusion of a solute along a channel is enhanced by hydrodynamic flow, a phenomenon known as Taylor dispersion. In microfluidic applications, the compliance of the channel boundaries modifies the hydrodynamic flow and thus solutal transport. Here, we develop the theory of solutal dispersion in a soft, axisymmetric channel where the channel walls respond to the hydrodynamic pressure through a Winkler response. By deriving the modified macro-transport equation for the solutal concentration dynamics based on multiple-time-scale analysis, we explore the influence of softness on solutal transport for steady and pulsatile configurations. Our main finding is that softness enhances the effective advection velocity and dispersion coefficient, which might have practical implication in biology and microfluidic technology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory for Taylor dispersion of a solute in a soft axisymmetric channel whose walls deform locally and linearly with hydrodynamic pressure according to the Winkler foundation model. Starting from the Navier-Stokes and advection-diffusion equations with this fluid-structure boundary condition, the authors apply multiple-time-scale analysis to derive an effective one-dimensional macro-transport equation. They obtain closed-form expressions for the effective advection velocity and dispersion coefficient and report that both quantities increase with channel softness (i.e., with the Winkler compliance constant) for both steady Poiseuille-like flow and pulsatile driving.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies an analytically tractable framework for solutal transport in compliant microfluidic channels and biological conduits. The use of systematic asymptotic averaging rather than post-hoc fitting yields explicit dependence of the effective coefficients on the single compliance parameter, which is a methodological strength. The result that softness enhances both advection and dispersion has direct relevance to design in soft microfluidics and to physiological transport problems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (model formulation): the Winkler boundary condition is introduced as the sole fluid-structure coupling; the manuscript does not quantify the regime of validity (small deformation, negligible bending stiffness, local response) or test whether the reported enhancement persists when a bending term or nonlocal elastic kernel is added, even though the stress-test note indicates that the sign of the correction can reverse under such modifications.
  2. [§4] §4 (pulsatile-flow results): the effective dispersion coefficient is obtained by averaging over the fast time scale while treating the wall deformation as quasi-static; for driving frequencies comparable to the elastic relaxation time, inertial wall effects omitted from the Winkler model could alter the phase lag between pressure and radius and therefore the net dispersion enhancement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the enhancement without indicating the range of the compliance parameter over which the linearised model remains consistent with the small-deformation assumption.
  2. Notation for the effective velocity U_eff and dispersion D_eff could be introduced earlier and used consistently when comparing the soft-channel expressions to the rigid-channel limits.
  3. Figure captions should explicitly label the curves by the dimensionless compliance parameter to facilitate direct comparison with the analytic formulas.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (model formulation): the Winkler boundary condition is introduced as the sole fluid-structure coupling; the manuscript does not quantify the regime of validity (small deformation, negligible bending stiffness, local response) or test whether the reported enhancement persists when a bending term or nonlocal elastic kernel is added, even though the stress-test note indicates that the sign of the correction can reverse under such modifications.

    Authors: We agree that the validity regime of the Winkler model merits explicit quantification. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §2 that states the assumptions quantitatively: radial wall displacement ≪ channel radius (small-deformation limit), bending stiffness negligible compared with the Winkler foundation term (thin-walled tubes), and local response valid when axial pressure gradients vary on scales much larger than wall thickness. We have also clarified the existing stress-test note by explaining that the sign reversal appears only when bending stiffness is artificially increased to dominate the compliance; this regime lies outside the soft-channel parameters explored in the paper. A full numerical test with bending or nonlocal kernels would require a different elastic formulation and lies beyond the scope of the present Winkler-based analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (pulsatile-flow results): the effective dispersion coefficient is obtained by averaging over the fast time scale while treating the wall deformation as quasi-static; for driving frequencies comparable to the elastic relaxation time, inertial wall effects omitted from the Winkler model could alter the phase lag between pressure and radius and therefore the net dispersion enhancement.

    Authors: The quasi-static wall treatment follows directly from the Winkler model, which omits wall inertia by construction. We have added a short paragraph in §4 that specifies the frequency range of validity: the reported enhancement holds when the driving frequency satisfies ω ≪ √(k/ρ_w), where k is the Winkler compliance and ρ_w the wall density. In this limit the phase lag between pressure and radius remains negligible. For frequencies approaching the elastic relaxation time, inertial wall dynamics would indeed modify the phase and therefore the dispersion; however, incorporating wall inertia requires a coupled dynamic fluid-structure model that is outside the scope of the present work. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Testing whether the reported enhancement persists when a bending term or nonlocal elastic kernel is added to the model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained asymptotic analysis

full rationale

The paper starts from the Navier-Stokes and advection-diffusion equations together with the Winkler boundary condition (linear local wall deformation proportional to pressure). It then applies multiple-time-scale analysis to obtain the modified macro-transport equation and the effective advection velocity plus dispersion coefficient. This is a standard perturbative averaging procedure whose outputs are not equivalent to its inputs by construction, nor obtained by fitting to the target quantities, nor justified solely by self-citation chains. The Winkler assumption is an explicit modeling choice, not a hidden tautology, and the enhancement result follows directly from the algebra under that assumption.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the Winkler foundation assumption and the validity of the multiple-time-scale separation; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Winkler compliance constant
    Parameter that sets the local wall deformation per unit pressure; appears in the boundary condition and controls the magnitude of the enhancement.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Winkler foundation model for wall deformation
    Assumes instantaneous, local, linear elastic response of the wall to pressure with no bending or inertial terms.
  • standard math Multiple-time-scale separation
    Assumes clear separation between fast advection/flow time scales and slow diffusion time scale to justify asymptotic averaging.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 1186 out tokens · 33862 ms · 2026-05-10T19:36:18.101474+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references

  1. [1]

    (31) The solution of these two equations indicates that C (0) is independent of R

    Leading-order analysis At O(1), the governing equation reads: 1 R ∂ ∂R R ∂C (0) ∂R = 0 , (30) which must satisfy the boundary condition: ∂C (0) ∂R R=A = 0 . (31) The solution of these two equations indicates that C (0) is independent of R. Since the O(1) solution corresponds in our case to dynamics at times T much larger than the dimensionless Taylor time...

  2. [2]

    (33) Taking the cross-sectional average of the former and using the latter leads to: ϕ ∂C (0) ∂T1 + Pe⟨U ⟩ ∂C (0) ∂Z = 0

    First-order analysis At O(ϵ), the governing equation reads: ϕ ∂C (0) ∂T1 + PeU ∂C (0) ∂Z = 1 R ∂ ∂R R ∂C (1) ∂R , (32) together with the boundary condition: ∂C (1) ∂R R=A = 0 . (33) Taking the cross-sectional average of the former and using the latter leads to: ϕ ∂C (0) ∂T1 + Pe⟨U ⟩ ∂C (0) ∂Z = 0 . (34) 6 Combining Eqs. (32) and (34), we arrive at the gov...

  3. [3]

    (45) 7 The cross-sectional average of the second term on the left-hand side of the governing equation is null, since ⟨C (1)⟩ =

    Second-order analysis At O(ϵ2), the governing equation reads: ϕ ∂C (0) ∂T2 + ϕ ∂C (1) ∂T1 + PeU ∂C (1) ∂Z + PeV ∂C (1) ∂R = ∂2C (0) ∂Z 2 + 1 R ∂ ∂R R ∂C (2) ∂R , (44) together with the boundary condition: ∂C (2) ∂R R=A = ∂A ∂Z ∂C (0) ∂Z . (45) 7 The cross-sectional average of the second term on the left-hand side of the governing equation is null, since ⟨C (1)⟩ =

  4. [4]

    Hydrodynamics at small scales: from soft matter to bioengineering

    Besides, cross-sectional averaging the last term on the right-hand side, and invoking the boundary condition, one has: 1 R ∂ ∂R R ∂C (2) ∂R = 2 A ∂A ∂Z ∂C (0) ∂Z . (46) For steady flows, invoking the first-order results, the cross-sectional averaging of the third and fourth terms on the left-hand side of the governing equation leads to: Pe * Us ∂C (1) s ∂...

  5. [5]

    The origins and the future of microfluidics

    Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. nature. 2006;442(7101):368-73

  6. [6]

    Microfluidics: basic issues, applications, and challenges

    Stone HA, Kim S. Microfluidics: basic issues, applications, and challenges. American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE Journal. 2001;47(6):1250

  7. [7]

    Mechanism of signal propagation in Physarum polycephalum

    Alim K, Andrew N, Pringle A, Brenner MP. Mechanism of signal propagation in Physarum polycephalum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(20):5136-41

  8. [8]

    Taylor dispersion of chemically reactive species: irreversible first-order reactions in bulk and on boundaries

    Shapiro M, Brenner H. Taylor dispersion of chemically reactive species: irreversible first-order reactions in bulk and on boundaries. Chemical engineering science. 1986;41(6):1417-33

  9. [9]

    Elastohydrodynamic relaxation of soft and deformable microchannels

    Guyard G, Restagno F, McGraw JD. Elastohydrodynamic relaxation of soft and deformable microchannels. Physical review letters. 2022;129(20):204501

  10. [10]

    Interfacial instability of thin films in soft microfluidic configurations actuated by electro-osmotic flow

    Boyko E, Ilssar D, Bercovici M, Gat AD. Interfacial instability of thin films in soft microfluidic configurations actuated by electro-osmotic flow. Physical Review Fluids. 2020;5(10):104201

  11. [11]

    Nonuniform electro-osmotic flow drives fluid-structure instability

    Boyko E, Eshel R, Gat AD, Bercovici M. Nonuniform electro-osmotic flow drives fluid-structure instability. Physical Review Letters. 2020;124(2):024501

  12. [12]

    Soft hydraulics: from Newtonian to complex fluid flows through compliant conduits

    Christov IC. Soft hydraulics: from Newtonian to complex fluid flows through compliant conduits. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2021;34(6):063001

  13. [13]

    Flow rate–pressure drop relation for deformable shallow microfluidic channels

    Christov IC, Cognet V, Shidhore TC, Stone HA. Flow rate–pressure drop relation for deformable shallow microfluidic channels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2018;841:267-86. 13

  14. [14]

    Oscillatory flows in three-dimensional deformable microchannels

    Huang A, Pande SD, Feng J, Christov IC. Oscillatory flows in three-dimensional deformable microchannels. arXiv preprint arXiv:250405132. 2025

  15. [15]

    Start-up flow in shallow deformable microchannels

    Mart´ ınez-Calvo A, Sevilla A, Peng GG, Stone HA. Start-up flow in shallow deformable microchannels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2020;885:A25

  16. [16]

    Transient compressible flow in a compliant viscoelastic tube

    Anand V, Christov IC. Transient compressible flow in a compliant viscoelastic tube. Physics of Fluids. 2020;32(11)

  17. [17]

    Theory of the flow-induced deformation of shallow compliant microchannels with thick walls

    Wang X, Christov IC. Theory of the flow-induced deformation of shallow compliant microchannels with thick walls. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2019;475(2231)

  18. [18]

    Theory and simulation of elastoinertial rectification of oscillatory flows in two- dimensional deformable rectangular channels

    Rade UM, Pande SD, Christov IC. Theory and simulation of elastoinertial rectification of oscillatory flows in two- dimensional deformable rectangular channels. arXiv preprint arXiv:250522799. 2025

  19. [19]

    Elasto-inertial rectification of oscillatory flow in an elastic tube

    Zhang X, Rallabandi B. Elasto-inertial rectification of oscillatory flow in an elastic tube. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2024;996:A16

  20. [20]

    Non-Newtonian fluid–structure interaction: Flow of a viscoelastic Oldroyd-B fluid in a deformable channel

    Boyko E, Christov IC. Non-Newtonian fluid–structure interaction: Flow of a viscoelastic Oldroyd-B fluid in a deformable channel. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2023;313:104990

  21. [21]

    Experimental investigation of the flow rate–pressure drop relation of a viscoelastic Boger fluid in a deformable channel

    Chun S, Christov IC, Feng J. Experimental investigation of the flow rate–pressure drop relation of a viscoelastic Boger fluid in a deformable channel. Physical Review Applied. 2025;24(3):034001

  22. [22]

    Oscillatory flows in compliant conduits at arbitrary Womersley number

    Pande SD, Wang X, Christov IC. Oscillatory flows in compliant conduits at arbitrary Womersley number. Physical Review Fluids. 2023;8(12):124102

  23. [23]

    Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube

    Taylor GI. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1953;219(1137):186-203

  24. [24]

    On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube

    Aris R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1956;235(1200):67-77

  25. [25]

    The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute in a solvent flowing along a straight pipe

    Chatwin P. The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute in a solvent flowing along a straight pipe. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1970;43(2):321-52

  26. [26]

    The initial development of longitudinal dispersion in straight tubes

    Chatwin P. The initial development of longitudinal dispersion in straight tubes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1977;80(1):33- 48

  27. [27]

    On the foundations of generalized Taylor dispersion theory

    Frankel I, Brenner H. On the foundations of generalized Taylor dispersion theory. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1989;204:97- 119

  28. [28]

    Transient Taylor–Aris dispersion for time-dependent flows in straight channels

    Vedel S, Bruus H. Transient Taylor–Aris dispersion for time-dependent flows in straight channels. Journal of fluid mechanics. 2012;691:95-122

  29. [29]

    Time-dependent Taylor–Aris dispersion of an initial point concentration

    Vedel S, Hovad E, Bruus H. Time-dependent Taylor–Aris dispersion of an initial point concentration. Journal of fluid mechanics. 2014;752:107-22

  30. [30]

    Near-surface rheology and hydrodynamic boundary condition of semi-dilute polymer solutions

    Guyard G, Vilquin A, Sanson N, Jouenne S, Restagno F, McGraw JD. Near-surface rheology and hydrodynamic boundary condition of semi-dilute polymer solutions. Soft Matter. 2021;17(14):3765-74

  31. [31]

    Unsteady convective diffusion with interphase mass transfer

    Sankarasubramanian R, Gill WN. Unsteady convective diffusion with interphase mass transfer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1973;333(1592):115-32

  32. [32]

    Effect of boundary absorption upon longitudinal dispersion in shear flows

    Smith R. Effect of boundary absorption upon longitudinal dispersion in shear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1983;134:161-77

  33. [33]

    An asymptotic theory for dispersion of reactive contaminants in parallel flow

    Barton N. An asymptotic theory for dispersion of reactive contaminants in parallel flow. The ANZIAM Journal. 1984;25(3):287-310

  34. [34]

    Dispersion due to wall interactions in microfluidic separation systems

    Datta S, Ghosal S. Dispersion due to wall interactions in microfluidic separation systems. Physics of Fluids. 2008;20(1)

  35. [35]

    Taylor dispersion with adsorption and desorption

    Levesque M, B´ enichou O, Voituriez R, Rotenberg B. Taylor dispersion with adsorption and desorption. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2012;86(3):036316

  36. [36]

    Time dependence of advection-diffusion coupling for nanoparticle ensembles

    Vilquin A, Bertin V, Soulard P, Guyard G, Rapha¨ el E, Restagno F, et al. Time dependence of advection-diffusion coupling for nanoparticle ensembles. Phys Rev Fluids. 2021 Jun;6:064201

  37. [37]

    Nanoparticle Taylor dispersion near charged surfaces with an open boundary

    Vilquin A, Bertin V, Rapha¨ el E, Dean DS, Salez T, McGraw JD. Nanoparticle Taylor dispersion near charged surfaces with an open boundary. Physical review letters. 2023;130(3):038201

  38. [38]

    Transport and dispersion across wiggling nanopores

    Marbach S, Dean DS, Bocquet L. Transport and dispersion across wiggling nanopores. Nature Physics. 2018;14(11):1108-13

  39. [39]

    Enhanced diffusive transport in fluctuating porous media

    Sarfati R, Calderon CP, Schwartz DK. Enhanced diffusive transport in fluctuating porous media. ACS nano. 2021;15(4):7392-8

  40. [40]

    Shear-augmented dispersion in non-Newtonian fluids

    Sharp MK. Shear-augmented dispersion in non-Newtonian fluids. Annals of biomedical engineering. 1993;21(4):407-15

  41. [41]

    Solute dispersion in pulsatile Casson fluid flow in a tube with wall absorption

    Rana J, Murthy P. Solute dispersion in pulsatile Casson fluid flow in a tube with wall absorption. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016;793:877-914

  42. [42]

    Unsteady solute dispersion in non-Newtonian fluid flow in a tube with wall absorption

    Rana J, Murthy P. Unsteady solute dispersion in non-Newtonian fluid flow in a tube with wall absorption. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2016;472(2193):20160294

  43. [43]

    Generalized Taylor-Aris dispersion in discrete spatially periodic networks: Microfluidic applica- tions

    Dorfman KD, Brenner H. Generalized Taylor-Aris dispersion in discrete spatially periodic networks: Microfluidic applica- tions. Physical Review E. 2002;65(2):021103

  44. [44]

    Effect of channel geometry on solute dispersion in pressure-driven microfluidic systems

    Dutta D, Ramachandran A, Leighton Jr DT. Effect of channel geometry on solute dispersion in pressure-driven microfluidic systems. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 2006;2(4):275-90

  45. [45]

    Dispersion reduction in pressure-driven flow through microetched channels

    Dutta D, Leighton DT. Dispersion reduction in pressure-driven flow through microetched channels. Analytical chemistry. 2001;73(3):504-13

  46. [46]

    How boundaries shape chemical delivery in microfluidics

    Aminian M, Bernardi F, Camassa R, Harris DM, McLaughlin RM. How boundaries shape chemical delivery in microfluidics. Science. 2016;354(6317):1252-6

  47. [47]

    Taylor dispersion in arbitrarily shaped axisymmetric channels

    Chang R, Santiago JG. Taylor dispersion in arbitrarily shaped axisymmetric channels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2023;976:A30. 14

  48. [48]

    Active control of dispersion within a channel with flow and pulsating walls

    Marbach S, Alim K. Active control of dispersion within a channel with flow and pulsating walls. Physical Review Fluids. 2019;4(11):114202

  49. [49]

    Transport of a dilute active suspension in pressure-driven channel flow

    Ezhilan B, Saintillan D. Transport of a dilute active suspension in pressure-driven channel flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2015;777:482-522

  50. [50]

    Dispersion of active particles in confined unidirectional flows

    Jiang W, Chen G. Dispersion of active particles in confined unidirectional flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2019;877:1-34

  51. [51]

    Upstream swimming and Taylor dispersion of active Brownian particles

    Peng Z, Brady JF. Upstream swimming and Taylor dispersion of active Brownian particles. Physical Review Fluids. 2020;5(7):073102

  52. [52]

    Transient dispersion process of active particles

    Jiang W, Chen G. Transient dispersion process of active particles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2021;927:A11

  53. [53]

    Enhanced dispersion of active microswimmers in confined flows

    Lagoin M, Lacherez J, de Tournemire G, Badr A, Amarouchene Y, Allard A, et al. Enhanced dispersion of active microswimmers in confined flows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025;122(50):e2519691122

  54. [54]

    Brownian motion near a liquid-like membrane

    Bickel T. Brownian motion near a liquid-like membrane. The European Physical Journal E. 2006;20:379-85

  55. [55]

    Particle mobility between two planar elastic membranes: Brownian motion and membrane deformation

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider A, Guckenberger A, Gekle S. Particle mobility between two planar elastic membranes: Brownian motion and membrane deformation. Physics of Fluids. 2016;28(7)

  56. [56]

    Observation of Brownian elastohydrodynamic forces acting on confined soft colloids

    Fares N, Lavaud M, Zhang Z, Jha A, Amarouchene Y, Salez T. Observation of Brownian elastohydrodynamic forces acting on confined soft colloids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2024;121(42):e2411956121

  57. [57]

    Dispersion in steady and oscillatory flows through a tube with reversible and irreversible wall reactions

    Ng CO. Dispersion in steady and oscillatory flows through a tube with reversible and irreversible wall reactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2006;462(2066):481-515

  58. [58]

    Dispersion in steady and time-oscillatory two-dimensional flows through a parallel-plate channel

    Chu HC, Garoff S, Przybycien TM, Tilton RD, Khair AS. Dispersion in steady and time-oscillatory two-dimensional flows through a parallel-plate channel. Physics of Fluids. 2019;31(2)

  59. [59]

    Continuous flow systems

    Danckwerts PV. Continuous flow systems. Distribution of residence times. Chemical engineering science. 1995;50(24):3857- 66

  60. [60]

    Measurement of residence time distribution in microfluidic systems

    Trachsel F, G¨ unther A, Khan S, Jensen KF. Measurement of residence time distribution in microfluidic systems. Chemical Engineering Science. 2005;60(21):5729-37

  61. [61]

    Residence time distribution (RTD) revisited

    Rodrigues AE. Residence time distribution (RTD) revisited. Chemical engineering science. 2021;230:116188

  62. [62]

    Flow-induced deformation of shallow microfluidic channels

    Gervais T, El-Ali J, G¨ unther A, Jensen KF. Flow-induced deformation of shallow microfluidic channels. Lab on a Chip. 2006;6(4):500-7

  63. [63]

    Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device

    Dendukuri D, Gu SS, Pregibon DC, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Stop-flow lithography in a microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip. 2007;7(7):818-28

  64. [64]

    Dispersion in flow through small tubes

    Fife P, Nicholes K. Dispersion in flow through small tubes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1975;344(1636):131-45

  65. [65]

    Oscillatory flow in arteries: the constrained elastic tube as a model of arterial flow and pulse transmission

    Womersley J, et al. Oscillatory flow in arteries: the constrained elastic tube as a model of arterial flow and pulse transmission. Physics in medicine and biology. 1957;2(2):178-87

  66. [66]

    A centre manifold description of contaminant dispersion in channels with varying flow properties

    Mercer GN, Roberts AJ. A centre manifold description of contaminant dispersion in channels with varying flow properties. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 1990;50(6):1547-65

  67. [67]

    A complete model of shear dispersion in pipes

    Mercer G, Roberts A. A complete model of shear dispersion in pipes. Japan journal of industrial and applied mathematics. 1994;11(3):499-521

  68. [68]

    Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers: Asymptotic methods and pertur- bation theory

    Bender CM, Orszag SA. Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers: Asymptotic methods and pertur- bation theory. vol. 1. Springer; 1999

  69. [69]

    Introduction to perturbation methods

    Holmes MH. Introduction to perturbation methods. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012

  70. [70]

    Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms

    Han HC. Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. Journal of vascular research. 2012;49(3):185-97