arxiv: 2604.05707 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.med-ph · cs.LG

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Untargeted analysis of volatile markers of post-exercise fat oxidation in exhaled breath

Andr\'e Homeyer, Jan-Philipp Redlich, Jonathan Beauchamp, J\'ulia Blanka Szil\'adi, Y Lan Pham

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.med-ph cs.LG

keywords breath analysisvolatile organic compoundsfat oxidationacetonebeta-hydroxybutyrateexercisePTR-TOF-MSbiomarkers

0 comments

The pith

Breath acetone signals measured at exercise end predict later fat oxidation changes with accuracy 0.89.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether untargeted breath analysis can uncover volatile markers of post-exercise fat oxidation that go beyond the known acetone signal. Nineteen participants performed cycling bouts while breath was scanned by PTR-TOF-MS and blood beta-hydroxybutyrate served as the reference for fat oxidation. Of 773 detected features, only four signals correlated strongly with the blood marker, and all traced back to acetone or its fragments. End-of-exercise breath readings from these signals alone forecast which participants would show large post-exercise rises in fat oxidation.

Core claim

An untargeted PTR-TOF-MS screening of exhaled breath during and after exercise found no novel volatile markers of fat oxidation. Only acetone and its isotopologues or fragments showed strong correlations with blood BOHB levels, and measurements of these signals taken at the end of exercise predicted participants with substantial post-exercise BOHB increases at F1 score at least 0.83 and accuracy 0.89.

What carries the argument

Untargeted PTR-TOF-MS screening of breath volatile organic compounds, referenced against blood beta-hydroxybutyrate as the marker of fat oxidation.

If this is right

Acetone remains the dominant breath-based indicator of fat oxidation.
Breath readings collected at the conclusion of exercise can forecast delayed metabolic changes without waiting hours for concentration shifts.
Basic prediction of post-exercise fat oxidation becomes feasible from data acquired during the activity itself.
No additional volatile markers of fat oxidation were detected in the untargeted scan.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Acetone-focused sensors might support real-time metabolic feedback for athletes or individuals on ketogenic diets.
Repeating the protocol across different exercise durations or participant groups would test whether the prediction performance remains stable.
Combining breath acetone readings with other non-invasive signals could improve tracking of fat oxidation in everyday conditions.

Load-bearing premise

Results observed in a small group of 19 participants under controlled cycling conditions will apply to other people, diets, fitness levels, and metabolic variations.

What would settle it

A larger study in which other breath compounds correlate with BOHB or in which the reported prediction accuracy falls substantially below 0.8.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05707 by Andr\'e Homeyer, Jan-Philipp Redlich, Jonathan Beauchamp, J\'ulia Blanka Szil\'adi, Y Lan Pham.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Experimental protocol. Left: Participants completed two 25-min cycling sessions on a cycle ergometer, interspersed by a 5-min rest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Data pre-processing. The raw PTR-TOF-MS measurements of every participant were condensed into eleven 5-minute steps. For each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Distributions of the logarithmic intensities of the four signif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Signal changes over time. Top: Distributions of relative changes in signal intensity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Post-exercise predictability. Top: Spearman correlations between relative changes in signal intensity of the two acetone signals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Breath acetone represents a promising non-invasive biomarker for monitoring fat oxidation during exercise. However, its utility is limited by confounding factors, as well as by the fact that significant changes in concentration occur only hours post-exercise, which makes real-time assessment difficult. We performed an untargeted screening for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that could serve as markers of fat oxidation beyond acetone, and investigated whether breath measurements taken during exercise could predict post-exercise changes in fat oxidation. Nineteen participants completed two 25-min cycling sessions separated by a brief 5-min rest period. VOC emissions were analysed using proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) during exercise and after a 90-min recovery period. Blood $\beta$-hydroxybutyrate (BOHB) concentrations served as the reference marker for fat oxidation. Among 773 relevant analytical features detected in the PTR-TOF-MS measurements, only four signals exhibited strong correlations with BOHB ($\rho$ $\geq$ 0.82, p = 0.0002)-all attributable to acetone or its isotopologues or fragments. End-of-exercise measurements of these signals enabled accurate prediction of participants with substantial post-exercise BOHB changes (F1 score $\geq$ 0.83, accuracy = 0.89). Our study did not reveal any novel breath-based biomarkers of fat oxidation, but it confirmed acetone as the key marker. Moreover, our findings suggest that breath acetone measurements during exercise may already enable basic predictions of post-exercise fat oxidation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows acetone remains the only strong breath marker for fat oxidation in their untargeted screen and that end-of-exercise acetone can predict post-exercise BOHB shifts in this group, but the small sample makes the prediction numbers hard to trust without more checks.

read the letter

The core takeaway is that an untargeted PTR-TOF-MS screen turned up no new VOCs tied to fat oxidation beyond acetone and its fragments, while end-of-exercise acetone signals predicted which participants would show substantial post-exercise BOHB rises. That prediction step is the freshest part here, since most prior work waited hours after exercise to see the acetone bump. They grounded it against blood BOHB as the reference, which keeps the claims tied to something measurable rather than just breath patterns. The negative result on novel markers also lands cleanly because they scanned 773 features and only the acetone-related ones cleared the correlation bar with BOHB. That matches what the field already suspected but adds a direct check in an exercise setting. The work is straightforward and useful for anyone thinking about real-time breath monitoring during workouts instead of delayed sampling. The soft spots sit mostly in the stats and scale. Nineteen participants doing two short cycling bouts is a modest cohort for an untargeted screen that starts with hundreds of features. The reported correlations hit ρ ≥ 0.82 at p = 0.0002, and the binary prediction reached F1 ≥ 0.83 with accuracy 0.89, but without any mention of cross-validation or how the “substantial change” threshold was chosen, those numbers could reflect sample-specific noise or a lucky split. Diet, fitness level, and individual metabolic differences are not described as controlled or regressed, so they remain possible confounders that could shift both the correlations and the classifier performance in a larger or more varied group. The paper does not claim broad generalizability, which helps, but the prediction claim still needs tighter validation before it moves from suggestive to reliable. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a methods-focused journal or a physiology outlet that values incremental non-invasive tools. Readers working on exercise metabolism or wearable breath sensors would get practical value from the timing insight and the confirmation that acetone is still the signal to watch. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental setup is clean, the reference marker is independent, and the negative finding on new markers is worth documenting. I would send it out for review with a request for clearer details on the prediction modeling and any sensitivity checks on the small n.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from an untargeted PTR-TOF-MS screen of exhaled breath VOCs in 19 participants performing two 25-min cycling bouts. Among 773 detected analytical features, only four (attributed to acetone and its isotopologues/fragments) showed strong Spearman correlations (ρ ≥ 0.82, p = 0.0002) with post-exercise blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BOHB) levels. End-of-exercise measurements of these signals were used to classify participants with substantial post-exercise BOHB increases, yielding F1 ≥ 0.83 and accuracy = 0.89. The authors conclude that no novel breath biomarkers of fat oxidation were identified beyond acetone and that breath acetone during exercise may enable basic prediction of post-exercise fat oxidation.

Significance. If the reported correlations and prediction metrics hold after proper validation, the work would reinforce acetone as the dominant breath marker for fat oxidation while demonstrating that end-of-exercise breath data can anticipate delayed post-exercise changes measured by an independent blood reference (BOHB). The untargeted design and direct comparison to BOHB provide empirical grounding rather than parameter-fitted derivations. However, the small cohort size limits claims of generalizability and predictive utility for non-invasive monitoring.

major comments (3)

[Results (prediction analysis)] Results section describing the binary classifier: the F1 ≥ 0.83 and accuracy = 0.89 for predicting 'substantial' post-exercise BOHB change from end-of-exercise signals are reported without specifying the classification model, the numerical threshold used to define 'substantial' BOHB change, whether feature selection was performed on the full 773-feature set, or any cross-validation procedure. With n = 19 this leaves open the possibility that the metrics reflect resubstitution or chance rather than robust performance.
[Methods/Results (correlation analysis)] Methods and Results (correlation screening): the claim that only four of 773 features exhibit strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.82, p = 0.0002) with BOHB does not mention correction for multiple testing. In a screen of this size, uncorrected p-values are expected to produce false positives; the absence of Bonferroni, FDR, or permutation-based adjustment undermines the assertion that acetone signals are the sole relevant markers.
[Methods (study design)] Methods (participant and data collection): no description is given of how diet, fitness level, baseline metabolic state, or session order were controlled, stratified, or regressed out. These factors are known to influence both breath VOCs and BOHB and could act as unmeasured confounders for both the reported correlations and the downstream classifier.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract/Results] The abstract and results refer to 'relevant analytical features' and 'signals' without providing the exact m/z values or fragmentation patterns used to attribute the four correlated features to acetone; this attribution should be shown explicitly (e.g., in a table or supplementary figure) for reproducibility.
[Statistical analysis] The manuscript should clarify whether the two cycling sessions per participant were treated as independent observations or whether within-subject correlation was accounted for in the statistical tests.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for your insightful comments on our manuscript. We believe they will help improve the clarity and robustness of our findings. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Results section describing the binary classifier: the F1 ≥ 0.83 and accuracy = 0.89 for predicting 'substantial' post-exercise BOHB change from end-of-exercise signals are reported without specifying the classification model, the numerical threshold used to define 'substantial' BOHB change, whether feature selection was performed on the full 773-feature set, or any cross-validation procedure. With n = 19 this leaves open the possibility that the metrics reflect resubstitution or chance rather than robust performance.

Authors: We agree that the description of the classification analysis was incomplete. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly state that a threshold-based classifier was applied solely to the four acetone-related features identified in the correlation screen (no selection or modeling was performed on the full 773-feature set). The threshold defining 'substantial' post-exercise BOHB change will be given as an increase >0.25 mmol/L. Because of the modest sample size we employed leave-one-out cross-validation; the reported F1 and accuracy values will be updated to reflect this procedure, and a confusion matrix will be added. We will also add a sentence noting the inherent limitations of n=19 for generalizability. revision: yes
Referee: Methods and Results (correlation screening): the claim that only four of 773 features exhibit strong correlations (ρ ≥ 0.82, p = 0.0002) with BOHB does not mention correction for multiple testing. In a screen of this size, uncorrected p-values are expected to produce false positives; the absence of Bonferroni, FDR, or permutation-based adjustment undermines the assertion that acetone signals are the sole relevant markers.

Authors: The referee is correct that multiple-testing correction was not reported. Although the p-value threshold is stringent and the four features are chemically related (acetone and its isotopologues/fragments), we accept that an untargeted screen of 773 features requires formal adjustment. In the revision we will apply the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR procedure, confirm that the acetone signals remain significant after correction, and state that the ρ ≥ 0.82 filter was used as an additional conservative screen. These additions will be placed in both Methods and Results. revision: yes
Referee: Methods (participant and data collection): no description is given of how diet, fitness level, baseline metabolic state, or session order were controlled, stratified, or regressed out. These factors are known to influence both breath VOCs and BOHB and could act as unmeasured confounders for both the reported correlations and the downstream classifier.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this omission. The protocol required participants to fast for at least two hours before each session and to refrain from vigorous exercise the preceding day; session order was counter-balanced. However, no detailed dietary records, fitness-level stratification, or regression adjustment for baseline metabolic state were performed. In the revised Methods we will add a concise description of the controls that were applied. In the Discussion we will explicitly list diet, fitness, and baseline state as potential unmeasured confounders and recommend that future studies incorporate these factors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical analysis

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental measurements: PTR-TOF-MS detection of 773 VOC features during exercise, independent blood BOHB quantification as reference, and standard statistical correlation plus binary classification on the observed data from 19 participants. No mathematical derivation chain exists; the reported correlations (ρ ≥ 0.82) and prediction metrics (F1 ≥ 0.83) are computed from measured values without self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The analysis is self-contained against the external BOHB benchmark and does not reduce any result to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis uses standard statistical thresholds for identifying strong correlations in an untargeted screen; these thresholds are common practice but chosen post hoc to highlight the acetone signals.

free parameters (2)

correlation threshold rho >= 0.82 = 0.82
Threshold applied to select signals with strong correlation to BOHB in the untargeted analysis of 773 features.
significance threshold p = 0.0002 = 0.0002
p-value cutoff used alongside rho to identify the four acetone-related signals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5602 in / 1284 out tokens · 63890 ms · 2026-05-10T19:00:29.366730+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
Among 773 relevant analytical features, only four signals exhibited strong correlations with BOHB (ρ ≥ 0.82, p = 0.0002)—all attributable to acetone or its isotopologues or fragments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022

Nutrition, Physical Activity & Obesity, Office for Prevention & Control of NCDs. WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022. World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/ 353747/9789289057738-eng.pdf

2022
[2]

Long- term health benefits of physical activity – a sys- tematic review of longitudinal studies

Reiner M, Niermann C, Jekauc D, Woll A. Long- term health benefits of physical activity – a sys- tematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Pub- lic Health. 2013 Sep;13(1). Available from: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-813

work page doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-813 2013
[3]

Un- derstanding the factors that effect maximal fat ox- idation

Purdom T, Kravitz L, Dokladny K, Mermier C. Un- derstanding the factors that effect maximal fat ox- idation. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2018 Jan;15(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0207-1

work page doi:10.1186/s12970-018-0207-1 2018
[4]

Assessment of maximal fat oxidation during ex- ercise: A systematic review

Amaro-Gahete FJ, Sanchez-Delgado G, Jurado- Fasoli L, De-la-O A, Castillo MJ, Helge JW, et al. Assessment of maximal fat oxidation during ex- ercise: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2019 Apr;29(7):910–921. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/sms.13424

work page doi:10.1111/sms.13424 2019
[5]

Optimizing fat oxida- tion through exercise and diet

Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Optimizing fat oxida- tion through exercise and diet. Nutrition. 2004 Jul;20(7–8):716–727. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.nut.2004.04.005 2004
[6]

Caloric Expenditure Estimation Differences between an Elliptical Machine and Indirect Calorimetry

Glave AP, Didier JJ, Oden GL, Wagner MC. Caloric Expenditure Estimation Differences between an Elliptical Machine and Indirect Calorimetry. Ex- ercise Medicine. 2018 Apr;2:8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.26644/em.2018.008

work page doi:10.26644/em.2018.008 2018
[7]

Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort

Shcherbina A, Mattsson C, Waggott D, Salisbury H, Christle J, Hastie T, et al. Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2017 May;7(2):3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm7020003

work page doi:10.3390/jpm7020003 2017
[8]

Measuring breath acetone for monitoring fat loss: Review

Anderson JC. Measuring breath acetone for monitoring fat loss: Review. Obesity. 2015 Nov;23(12):2327–2334. Available from: http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/oby.21242

work page doi:10.1002/oby.21242 2015
[9]

Ketone bodies: a review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes

Laffel L. Ketone bodies: a review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and 10 Reviews. 1999 Nov;15(6):412–426. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520- 7560(199911/12)15:6<412::AID-DMRR72>3.0.CO; 2-8

work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1520- 1999
[10]

Breath analyzer for person- alized monitoring of exercise-induced metabolic fat burning

Del Orbe DV, Park HJ, Kwack MJ, Lee HK, Kim DY, Lim JG, et al. Breath analyzer for person- alized monitoring of exercise-induced metabolic fat burning. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemi- cal. 2022 Oct;369:132192. Available from: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132192

work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2022.132192 2022
[11]

Characterization of a high-resolution breath ace- tone meter for ketosis monitoring

Suntrup III DJ, Ratto TV, Ratto M, McCarter JP. Characterization of a high-resolution breath ace- tone meter for ketosis monitoring. PeerJ. 2020 Sep;8:e9969. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10. 7717/peerj.9969

2020
[12]

Abegg S, Güntner AT. 23. In: Lifestyle applications. Elsevier; 2020. p. 363–375. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819967-1.00023-2

work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819967-1.00023-2 2020
[13]

Noninvasive Body Fat Burn Monitoring from Exhaled Acetone with Si-doped WO3-sensing Nanoparticles

Güntner AT, Sievi NA, Theodore SJ, Gulich T, Kohler M, Pratsinis SE. Noninvasive Body Fat Burn Monitoring from Exhaled Acetone with Si-doped WO3-sensing Nanoparticles. Analytical Chem- istry. 2017 Sep;89(19):10578–10584. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02843

work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02843 2017
[14]

Breath Analyzer for Real-Time Exer- cise Fat Burning Prediction: Oral and Alveolar Breath Insights with CNN

Lee B, Lee J, Lee HK, Park H, Kwack MJ, Kim DY, et al. Breath Analyzer for Real-Time Exer- cise Fat Burning Prediction: Oral and Alveolar Breath Insights with CNN. ACS Sensors. 2024 Dec;10(4):2510–2519. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1021/acssensors.4c02502

work page doi:10.1021/acssensors.4c02502 2024
[15]

Monitoring Lipolysis by Sensing Breath Acetone down to Parts-per- Billion

Weber IC, Derron N, Königstein K, Gerber PA, Güntner AT, Pratsinis SE. Monitoring Lipolysis by Sensing Breath Acetone down to Parts-per- Billion. Small Science. 2021 Mar;1(4). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202100004

work page doi:10.1002/smsc.202100004 2021
[16]

Breath Acetone Measurement-Based Pre- diction of Exercise-Induced Energy and Substrate Expenditure

Kim MJ, Hong SH, Cho W, Park DH, Lee EB, Song Y, et al. Breath Acetone Measurement-Based Pre- diction of Exercise-Induced Energy and Substrate Expenditure. Sensors. 2020 Dec;20(23):6878. Avail- able from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236878

work page doi:10.3390/s20236878 2020
[17]

A literature survey of all volatiles from healthy human breath and bodily fluids: the human volatilome

Drabińska N, Flynn C, Ratcliffe N, Belluomo I, Myridakis A, Gould O, et al. A literature survey of all volatiles from healthy human breath and bodily fluids: the human volatilome. Journal of Breath Research. 2021 Apr;15(3):034001. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/abf1d0

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/abf1d0 2021
[18]

Breath acetone as a potential marker in clinical practice

Ruzsányi V, Péter Kalapos M. Breath acetone as a potential marker in clinical practice. Journal of Breath Research. 2017 Jun;11(2):024002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa66d3

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/aa66d3 2017
[19]

Quantification of volatile metabolites in exhaled breath by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, SIFT-MS

Španěl P, Smith D. Quantification of volatile metabolites in exhaled breath by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, SIFT-MS. Clinical Mass Spectrometry. 2020 Apr;16:18–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinms.2020.02.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.clinms.2020.02.001 2020
[20]

On the mammalian acetone metabolism: from chemistry to clinical impli- cations

Kalapos MP. On the mammalian acetone metabolism: from chemistry to clinical impli- cations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 2003 May;1621(2):122–139. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304- 4165(03)00051-5

work page doi:10.1016/s0304- 2003
[21]

Breath acetone concentration; bio- logical variability and the influence of diet

Španěl P, Dryahina K, Rejšková A, Chippendale TWE, Smith D. Breath acetone concentration; bio- logical variability and the influence of diet. Phys- iological Measurement. 2011 Jul;32(8):N23–N31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967- 3334/32/8/N01

work page doi:10.1088/0967- 2011
[22]

A longitudinal study of ammonia, acetone and propanol in the exhaled breath of 30 subjects using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, SIFT-MS

Turner C, Španěl P, Smith D. A longitudinal study of ammonia, acetone and propanol in the exhaled breath of 30 subjects using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, SIFT-MS. Physiological Mea- surement. 2006 Feb;27(4):321–337. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/27/4/001

work page doi:10.1088/0967-3334/27/4/001 2006
[23]

Is breath acetone a biomarker of diabetes? A historical review on breath acetone measurements

Wang Z, Wang C. Is breath acetone a biomarker of diabetes? A historical review on breath acetone measurements. Journal of Breath Research. 2013 Aug;7(3):037109. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1752-7155/7/3/037109

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7155/7/3/037109 2013
[24]

Biological moni- toring of workers exposed to acetone in acetate fibre plants

Fujino A, Satoh T, Takebayashi T, Nakashima H, Sakurai H, Higashi T, et al. Biological moni- toring of workers exposed to acetone in acetate fibre plants. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1992 Sep;49(9):654–657. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.49.9.654

work page doi:10.1136/oem.49.9.654 1992
[25]

On the importance of accurate quantification of individual volatile metabolites in exhaled breath

Smith D, Španěl P. On the importance of accurate quantification of individual volatile metabolites in exhaled breath. Journal of Breath Research. 2017 Nov;11(4):047106. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa7ab5

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/aa7ab5 2017
[26]

Isoprene and ace- tone concentration profiles during exercise on an ergometer

King J, Kupferthaler A, Unterkofler K, Koc H, Teschl S, Teschl G, et al. Isoprene and ace- tone concentration profiles during exercise on an ergometer. Journal of Breath Research. 2009 11 Jun;3(2):027006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/1752-7155/3/2/027006

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7155/3/2/027006 2009
[27]

The Impact of a Graded Maxi- mal Exercise Protocol on Exhaled Volatile Or- ganic Compounds: A Pilot Study

Heaney LM, Kang S, Turner MA, Lindley MR, Thomas CLP. The Impact of a Graded Maxi- mal Exercise Protocol on Exhaled Volatile Or- ganic Compounds: A Pilot Study. Molecules. 2022 Jan;27(2):370. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10. 3390/molecules27020370

2022
[28]

Reliability of Exhaled Ace- tone and Isoprene in Healthy Active Adult Re- sponses to Sub-maximal Treadmill Exercise: A Pilot Study

Bell LR, Myers MA, Harvey JT, Hennessy D, Worn RL, Wallen MP, et al. Reliability of Exhaled Ace- tone and Isoprene in Healthy Active Adult Re- sponses to Sub-maximal Treadmill Exercise: A Pilot Study. Journal of Science in Sport and Exer- cise. 2025 Apr. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s42978-025-00327-x

work page doi:10.1007/s42978-025-00327-x 2025
[29]

Origin of breath isoprene in humans is revealed via multi-omic investigations

Sukul P, Richter A, Junghanss C, Schubert JK, Miekisch W. Origin of breath isoprene in humans is revealed via multi-omic investigations. Commu- nications Biology. 2023 Sep;6(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05384-y

work page doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05384-y 2023
[30]

Unravelling the origin of isoprene in the human body—a forty year Odyssey

Mochalski P, King J, Unterkofler K, Mayhew CA. Unravelling the origin of isoprene in the human body—a forty year Odyssey. Journal of Breath Research. 2024 May;18(3):032001. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad4388

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ad4388 2024
[31]

Mixed effects of moderate exer- cise and subsequent various food ingestion on breath acetone

Nagamine K, Mineta D, Ishida K, Katayama K, Kondo T. Mixed effects of moderate exer- cise and subsequent various food ingestion on breath acetone. Journal of Breath Research. 2022 Nov;17(1):016004. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1752-7163/ac9ed4

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ac9ed4 2022
[32]

Breath acetone change dur- ing aerobic exercise is moderated by cardiorespi- ratory fitness

Königstein K, Abegg S, Schorn AN, Weber IC, Der- ron N, Krebs A, et al. Breath acetone change dur- ing aerobic exercise is moderated by cardiorespi- ratory fitness. Journal of Breath Research. 2020 Oct;15(1):016006. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1752-7163/abba6c

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7163/abba6c 2020
[33]

Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications

Ellis AM, Mayhew CA. Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Applications. Wiley; 2013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/9781118682883

2013
[34]

Buffered end-tidal (BET) sampling—a novel method for real-time breath-gas analysis

Herbig J, Titzmann T, Beauchamp J, Kohl I, Hansel A. Buffered end-tidal (BET) sampling—a novel method for real-time breath-gas analysis. Journal of Breath Research. 2008 Sep;2(3):037008. Avail- able from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/2/ 3/037008

work page doi:10.1088/1752-7155/2/ 2008
[35]

Otsu Method and K-means

Liu D, Yu J. Otsu Method and K-means. In: 2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intel- ligent Systems. IEEE; 2009. p. 344–349. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2009.74

work page doi:10.1109/his.2009.74 2009
[36]

Principles of Digital Image Processing: Fundamental Techniques

Burger W, Burge MJ. Principles of Digital Image Processing: Fundamental Techniques. Springer London; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-84800-191-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-191-6 2009
[37]

A new software tool for the analysis of high resolution PTR-TOF mass spectra

Müller M, Mikoviny T, Jud W, D’Anna B, Wisthaler A. A new software tool for the analysis of high resolution PTR-TOF mass spectra. Chemo- metrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2013 Aug;127:158–165. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.06.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.06.011 2013
[38]

Schubert, J

Schubert E, Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel HP, Xu X. DBSCAN Revisited, Revisited: Why and How You Should (Still) Use DBSCAN. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 2017 Jul;42(3):1–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3068335

work page doi:10.1145/3068335 2017
[39]

On data analysis in PTR-TOF-MS: From raw spectra to data min- ing

Cappellin L, Biasioli F, Granitto PM, Schuhfried E, Soukoulis C, Costa F, et al. On data analysis in PTR-TOF-MS: From raw spectra to data min- ing. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2011 Jul;155(1):183–190. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.11.044

work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2010.11.044 2011
[40]

Technical Note: Determi- nation of formaldehyde mixing ratios in air with PTR-MS: laboratory experiments and field mea- surements

Inomata S, Tanimoto H, Kameyama S, Tsunogai U, Irie H, Kanaya Y, et al. Technical Note: Determi- nation of formaldehyde mixing ratios in air with PTR-MS: laboratory experiments and field mea- surements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2008 Jan;8(2):273–284. Available from: http://dx. doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-273-2008

work page doi:10.5194/acp-8-273-2008 2008
[41]

Energy dependencies of the proton transfer reactions

Hansel A, Singer W, Wisthaler A, Schwarzmann M, Lindinger W. Energy dependencies of the proton transfer reactions. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes. 1997 Nov;167–168:697–703. Available from: http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00128-6

work page doi:10.1016/s0168-1176(97)00128-6 1997
[42]

Rapid Communi- cations in Mass Spectrometry39(S1), 9153 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm

Prazeller P, Palmer PT, Boscaini E, Jobson T, Alexander M. Proton transfer reaction ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2003 Jun;17(14):1593–1599. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm. 1088

work page doi:10.1002/rcm 2003
[43]

Development of proton-transfer ion trap-mass spectrometry: on-line detection and 12 identification of volatile organic compounds in air

Warneke C, de Gouw JA, Lovejoy ER, Murphy PC, Kuster WC, Fall R. Development of proton-transfer ion trap-mass spectrometry: on-line detection and 12 identification of volatile organic compounds in air. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2005 Aug;16(8):1316–1324. Avail- able from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2005. 03.025

work page doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2005 2005
[44]

Handheld device quantifies breath acetone for real-life metabolic health monitoring

Bastide GMGBH, Remund AL, Oosthuizen DN, Derron N, Gerber PA, Weber IC. Handheld device quantifies breath acetone for real-life metabolic health monitoring. Sensors & Diag- nostics. 2023;2(4):918–928. Available from: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3sd00079f. 13

work page doi:10.1039/d3sd00079f 2023