pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06087 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-lat· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gauss law codes and vacuum codes from lattice gauge theories

Aidan Chatwin-Davies, Javier P. Lacambra, Masazumi Honda, Philipp A. Hoehn

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-lathep-th
keywords quantum error correctionlattice gauge theoryquantum reference framesGauss law codesvacuum codesAbelian gauge groupsZ2 gauge theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Abelian lattice gauge theories produce quantum error correcting codes via quantum reference frames.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs two types of quantum error correcting codes from Abelian lattice gauge theories on arbitrary lattices. Gauss law codes use the entire gauge-invariant sector as the code space, while vacuum codes further restrict to the matter vacuum. Quantum reference frames serve as the tool to define these subspaces and identify which errors are correctable. The approach works for pure gauge theories and those coupled to bosonic or fermionic matter, revealing unitary equivalences between code types for finite gauge groups. Such constructions link gauge theory symmetries directly to error protection in quantum devices.

Core claim

We develop a comprehensive framework for constructing quantum error correcting codes from Abelian lattice gauge theories using quantum reference frames as a unifying formalism. The codes fall into Gauss law codes that identify the code subspace with the full gauge-invariant sector and vacuum codes that restrict to the matter vacuum sector. For finite gauge groups vacuum codes are unitarily equivalent to pure gauge theory Gauss law codes, while for continuous groups this holds only after charge coarse-graining. Quantum reference frames characterize the algebraic structures and correctable error sets in all cases.

What carries the argument

Quantum reference frames as a unifying formalism to fully characterize the algebraic structures and correctable error sets of codes from Abelian lattice gauge theories.

If this is right

  • In models with matter, the code space factors into gauge-invariant Wilson loops and dressed matter excitations.
  • Errors in vacuum codes correspond to gauge-invariant charge excitations rather than Gauss law violations.
  • The framework applies to arbitrary compact Abelian gauge groups and lattices in any dimension.
  • When the gauge group is finite, vacuum codes are unitarily equivalent to pure gauge theory Gauss law codes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This equivalence suggests that matter degrees of freedom can be integrated out to obtain equivalent error protection in pure gauge systems.
  • The approach may allow quantum devices to simulate LGTs more robustly by using gauge invariance for error correction.
  • Similar constructions might extend the parallelism between quantum error correction and gauge theory to non-Abelian cases.

Load-bearing premise

That quantum reference frames provide a complete and systematic characterization of the algebraic structures and correctable error sets for arbitrary compact Abelian gauge groups, lattices in any dimension, and both pure gauge and matter-coupled theories.

What would settle it

An explicit counterexample in which the quantum reference frame approach fails to identify the correct code subspace or correctable errors for some Abelian gauge group or lattice dimension.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06087 by Aidan Chatwin-Davies, Javier P. Lacambra, Masazumi Honda, Philipp A. Hoehn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spanning tree R (blue) for a 4 × 4 square lattice with periodic boundary conditions. The complement S appears in black. The Wilson line along a system link ℓ ∈ S may be dressed with the tree Wilson lines W χ¯ Rv = (W χ Rv ) † , W χ Rv′ , connecting its endpoints with the root of the tree, v0, on the bottom left. This results in the Wilson loop Hℓ. This algebra is, in fact, the full algebra of bounded opera… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: System plaquette as a product of generating tree Wilson loops on a 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Graphical depiction of the gauge invariant star operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Z2 gauge theory on a triangular lattice The eigenbases of Xℓ and Zℓ correspond to the dual bases for Hℓ from Section 3.1.1.1. The magnetic (group) basis consists of states |±⟩ℓ labeled by the elements of the multiplicative group G = {+, −} ≃ Z2, with Xℓ |±⟩ℓ = ± |±⟩ℓ , Zℓ |±⟩ℓ = |∓⟩ℓ , (4.5) so that Zℓ acts as the group shift. The electric (dual) basis, by contrast, diagonalizes Zℓ and shifts under Xℓ, Zℓ … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Collective vertex variables (red) in relation to link [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p070_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Staggered fermions on a square lattice. Even sites (green) support positively charged fermions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a comprehensive framework for constructing quantum error correcting codes (QECCs) from Abelian lattice gauge theories (LGTs) using quantum reference frames (QRFs) as a unifying formalism. We consider LGTs with arbitrary compact Abelian gauge groups supported on lattices in arbitrary numbers of spatial dimensions, and we work with both pure gauge theories and theories with couplings to bosonic and fermionic matter. The codes that we construct fall into two classes: First, Gauss law codes identify the code subspace with the full gauge-invariant sector of the theory. In models with matter coupled to gauge fields, these codes inherit a natural subsystem structure in which gauge-invariant Wilson loops and dressed matter excitations factorize the code space. Second, vacuum codes restrict the code subspace to the matter vacuum sector within the gauge-invariant subspace, yielding codes where errors correspond to gauge-invariant charge excitations rather than to violations of the Gauss law. Despite their distinct setup, we show that when the gauge group is finite, vacuum codes are unitarily equivalent to pure gauge theory Gauss law codes, and that when the group is continuous, this is only true upon a charge coarse-graining of the vacuum code. In all cases, QRFs provide a systematic apparatus for fully characterizing the codes' algebraic structures and correctable error sets. For clarity, we illustrate our general results in $\mathbb{Z}_2$-gauge theory, as well as in scalar and fermionic QED. These findings offer fundamental insights into the parallelism between quantum error correction and gauge theory and point toward practical advantages for simulating LGTs on noisy quantum devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework for constructing quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) from Abelian lattice gauge theories (LGTs) on arbitrary-dimensional lattices with compact Abelian gauge groups, using quantum reference frames (QRFs) as the unifying formalism. It defines two classes of codes: Gauss law codes, which take the full gauge-invariant sector as the code subspace (with a natural subsystem structure when matter is coupled), and vacuum codes, which further restrict to the matter-vacuum sector so that errors correspond to gauge-invariant charge excitations. The paper claims that, for finite gauge groups, vacuum codes are unitarily equivalent to pure-gauge Gauss law codes; for continuous groups the equivalence holds only after charge coarse-graining. QRFs are used to characterize the algebraic structure and correctable error sets in all cases. Concrete illustrations are given for ℤ₂ gauge theory, scalar QED, and fermionic QED.

Significance. If the claimed equivalences and QRF-based characterizations hold, the work establishes a systematic bridge between gauge-invariant subspaces in LGTs and the code subspaces of QECCs, supplying both a general construction for arbitrary compact Abelian groups and explicit models. The unitary equivalence statements and the distinction between Gauss-law and vacuum codes provide concrete, falsifiable relations that could be tested in quantum simulations. The framework also suggests practical routes for encoding gauge-invariant information on noisy quantum hardware, which is a timely contribution given current efforts to simulate LGTs.

major comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction assert a general construction and an equivalence theorem for arbitrary compact Abelian groups and lattices in any dimension, yet the provided text supplies no explicit operator definitions, error-set proofs, or derivations of the unitary maps. A central load-bearing claim is therefore not yet verifiable from the manuscript as presented.
  2. § on vacuum-code equivalence (continuous-group case): the statement that equivalence holds only after 'charge coarse-graining' is introduced without a precise definition of the coarse-graining map or a demonstration that it preserves the correctable error set. This step is essential to the claimed distinction between finite and continuous cases.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the QRF Hilbert-space decomposition and the gauge-invariant projector should be introduced once and used consistently; several passages reuse symbols without redefinition.
  2. The illustrations for scalar and fermionic QED are described at a high level; explicit Hamiltonians or stabilizer generators for the code subspaces would strengthen the concrete examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and verifiability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract and introduction assert a general construction and an equivalence theorem for arbitrary compact Abelian groups and lattices in any dimension, yet the provided text supplies no explicit operator definitions, error-set proofs, or derivations of the unitary maps. A central load-bearing claim is therefore not yet verifiable from the manuscript as presented.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation regarding the level of explicitness. The manuscript presents the general framework via the QRF formalism in Sections 3 and 4, along with statements of the equivalence theorems for finite and continuous groups. However, we agree that additional detail on operator definitions, derivations of the unitary maps, and proofs of the correctable error sets would strengthen verifiability. In the revised manuscript we will expand these sections to include explicit operator expressions for the code projectors and error operators, step-by-step derivations of the unitary equivalences for finite groups, and complete proofs that the error sets are preserved under the maps, covering arbitrary compact Abelian groups on lattices of any dimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: § on vacuum-code equivalence (continuous-group case): the statement that equivalence holds only after 'charge coarse-graining' is introduced without a precise definition of the coarse-graining map or a demonstration that it preserves the correctable error set. This step is essential to the claimed distinction between finite and continuous cases.

    Authors: We concur that the charge coarse-graining step requires a more precise treatment. In the revised manuscript we will supply a formal definition of the coarse-graining map as the projection onto a discretized charge lattice (or an averaging operator over charge sectors) acting on the matter Hilbert space. We will then demonstrate explicitly that this map sends the correctable error set of the vacuum code to the correctable error set of the corresponding pure-gauge Gauss-law code, thereby establishing the claimed unitary equivalence for continuous groups. An illustrative calculation for the U(1) case in scalar QED will be added to make the construction concrete. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs Gauss law codes (identifying the code subspace with the full gauge-invariant sector) and vacuum codes (restricting to the matter vacuum sector) from Abelian LGTs via QRFs as a unifying formalism. The claimed unitary equivalences for finite groups and charge coarse-graining for continuous groups are derived algebraically within the framework, with explicit characterizations of algebraic structures and correctable error sets. Concrete illustrations in Z2-gauge theory, scalar QED, and fermionic QED are supplied directly. No load-bearing steps reduce by the paper's equations to self-definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or unverified self-citation chains; the QRF apparatus is applied as an external tool to organize standard gauge theory content rather than presupposing the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mathematical properties of compact Abelian gauge groups, lattice gauge theories, and quantum reference frames; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard algebraic and representation-theoretic properties of compact Abelian gauge groups and quantum reference frames.
    The framework invokes these background structures to define gauge-invariant sectors and to characterize code algebras.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5602 in / 1306 out tokens · 43221 ms · 2026-05-10T19:23:18.114582+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Charge superselection rule,

    Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind, “Charge superselection rule,”Phys. Rev.155(1967) 1428–1431

    1967

  2. [2]

    Quantum frames of reference,

    Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr, “Quantum frames of reference,”Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 368–385. 91

    1984

  3. [3]

    Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables,

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, “Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables,”Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 2885–2892

    1983

  4. [4]

    Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory,

    B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory,”Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113–1148

    1967

  5. [5]

    Quantum reference systems,

    C. Rovelli, “Quantum reference systems,”Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 317–332

    1991

  6. [6]

    Partial observables,

    C. Rovelli, “Partial observables,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 124013

    2002

  7. [7]

    Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, “Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information,”Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 555–609,arXiv:quant-ph/0610030

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and v. Brukner, “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,”Nat. Commun.10no. 1, (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    de la Hamette, T

    A.-C. de la Hamette, T. D. Galley, P. A. H¨ ohn, L. Loveridge, and M. P. M¨ uller, “Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups,” arXiv:2110.13824 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Quantum Frame Relativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics,

    P. A. H¨ ohn, I. Kotecha, and F. M. Mele, “Quantum Frame Relativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics,”arXiv:2308.09131 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Vanrietvelde, P

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. H¨ ohn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz, “A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework,”Quantum4(2020) 225,arXiv:1809.00556 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Ali Ahmad, T

    S. Ali Ahmad, T. D. Galley, P. A. H¨ ohn, M. P. E. Lock, and A. R. H. Smith, “Quantum Relativity of Subsystems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 17, (2022) 170401,arXiv:2103.01232 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Araujo-Regado, P.A

    G. Ara´ ujo-Regado, P. A. H¨ ohn, and F. Sartini, “Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories,”arXiv:2506.23459 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transformations,

    T. Carette, J. G lowacki, and L. Loveridge, “Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transformations,”Quantum9(2025) 1680,arXiv:2303.14002 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Interpreting quantum reference frame transformations through a simple example,

    E. Castro-Ruiz, T. D. Galley, and L. Loveridge, “Interpreting quantum reference frame transformations through a simple example,”arXiv:2508.09540 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Carrozza and P

    S. Carrozza and P. A. H¨ ohn, “Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection,”JHEP02(2022) 172,arXiv:2109.06184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Soft edges: the many links between soft and edge modes,

    G. Ara´ ujo-Regado, P. A. H¨ ohn, F. Sartini, and B. Tomova, “Soft edges: the many links between soft and edge modes,”JHEP07(2025) 180,arXiv:2412.14548 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, “Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,”JHEP2016no. 9, (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach,

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, and K. Rejzner, “Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach,”arXiv:2508.20939 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Fighting non-locality with non-locality: microcausality and boundary conditions in QED,

    P. A. H¨ ohn and J. Kirklin, “Fighting non-locality with non-locality: microcausality and boundary conditions in QED,”arXiv:2512.16898 [hep-th]. 92

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Goeller, P

    C. Goeller, P. A. H¨ ohn, and J. Kirklin, “Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,”arXiv:2206.01193 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    De Vuyst, S

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. H¨ ohn, and J. Kirklin, “Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,”JHEP07(2025) 146,arXiv:2405.00114 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Gravitational null rays: Covariant Quantization and the Dressing Time

    L. Freidel and J. Kirklin, “Gravitational null rays: Covariant Quantization and the Dressing Time,”arXiv:2604.02228 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument,

    V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, L. Apadula, C. Cepollaro, H. Gomes, J. Butterfield, and ˇC. Brukner, “Quantum coordinates, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument,” Commun. Phys.8no. 1, (2025) 185,arXiv:2402.10267 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames,

    S. Carrozza, A. Chatwin-Davies, P. A. H¨ ohn, and F. M. Mele, “A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames,”arXiv:2412.15317 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons,”Annals Phys.303(2003) 2–30, arXiv:quant-ph/9707021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  27. [27]

    Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary

    S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, “Quantum codes on a lattice with boundary,” arXiv:quant-ph/9811052

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Confinement of Quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,”Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2445–2459

    1974

  29. [29]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 395–408

    1975

  30. [30]

    An Introduction to Lattice Gauge Theory and Spin Systems,

    J. B. Kogut, “An Introduction to Lattice Gauge Theory and Spin Systems,”Rev. Mod. Phys.51 (1979) 659

    1979

  31. [31]

    Gauss’ law code,

    “Gauss’ law code,” inThe Error Correction Zoo, V. V. Albert and P. Faist, eds. 2024. https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/gauss_law

    2024

  32. [32]

    Rajput, A

    A. Rajput, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe, “Quantum error correction with gauge symmetries,”npj Quantum Inf.9no. 1, (2023) 41,arXiv:2112.05186 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Fault-tolerant simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories with gauge covariant codes,

    L. Spagnoli, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe, “Fault-tolerant simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories with gauge covariant codes,”Quantum10(2026) 1968,arXiv:2405.19293 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Qudit stabiliser codes forZ N lattice gauge theories with matter,

    L. Spagnoli, A. Roggero, and N. Wiebe, “Qudit stabiliser codes forZ N lattice gauge theories with matter,”arXiv:2602.20661 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Quantum Error Correction Codes for Truncated SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories,

    X. Yao, “Quantum Error Correction Codes for Truncated SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories,” arXiv:2511.13721 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Simulating physics with computers,

    R. P. Feynman, “Simulating physics with computers,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.21no. 6, (1982) 467–488

    1982

  37. [37]

    Universal quantum simulators,

    S. Lloyd, “Universal quantum simulators,”Science273(1996) 1073–1078

    1996

  38. [38]

    Quantum simulation,

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, “Quantum simulation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.86no. 1, (2014) 153–185.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153. 93

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 2014

  39. [39]

    Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities,

    E. Altman et al., “Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities,”PRX Quantum2 no. 1, (2021) 017003,arXiv:1912.06938 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,

    A. J. Daley, I. Bloch, C. Kokail, S. Flannigan, N. Pearson, M. Troyer, and P. Zoller, “Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,”Nature607no. 7920, (2022) 667–676

    2022

  41. [41]

    Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress,

    C. Ratti, “Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress,”Rept. Prog. Phys. 81no. 8, (2018) 084301,arXiv:1804.07810 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Review of Baryon Spectroscopy in Lattice QCD,

    H.-W. Lin, “Review of Baryon Spectroscopy in Lattice QCD,”Chin. J. Phys.49(2011) 827, arXiv:1106.1608 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Philipsen, The QCD equation of state from the lattice, Prog

    O. Philipsen, “The QCD equation of state from the lattice,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.70(2013) 55–107,arXiv:1207.5999 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD,

    H.-T. Ding, F. Karsch, and S. Mukherjee, “Thermodynamics of strong-interaction matter from Lattice QCD,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. E24no. 10, (2015) 1530007,arXiv:1504.05274 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Aarts, Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number, J

    G. Aarts, “Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 706no. 2, (2016) 022004,arXiv:1512.05145 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign prob- lem: current status and open problems, Prog

    K. Nagata, “Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127(2022) 103991,arXiv:2108.12423 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Bañuls et al.,Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies,Eur

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls et al., “Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies,”Eur. Phys. J. D74no. 8, (2020) 165,arXiv:1911.00003 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Funcke, T

    L. Funcke, T. Hartung, K. Jansen, and S. K¨ uhn, “Review on Quantum Computing for Lattice Field Theory,”PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 228,arXiv:2302.00467 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Bauer, Z

    C. W. Bauer et al., “Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics,”PRX Quantum4no. 2, (2023) 027001,arXiv:2204.03381 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio et al., “Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges,”PRX Quantum5no. 3, (2024) 037001,arXiv:2307.03236 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitizations of lattice field theories,

    M. Carena, H. Lamm, Y.-Y. Li, and W. Liu, “Quantum error thresholds for gauge-redundant digitizations of lattice field theories,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 054516,arXiv:2402.16780 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Oracles for Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers,

    J. R. Stryker, “Oracles for Gauss’s law on digital quantum computers,”Phys. Rev. A99no. 4, (2019) 042301,arXiv:1812.01617 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Solving Gauss’s Law on Digital Quantum Computers with Loop-String-Hadron Digitization,

    I. Raychowdhury and J. R. Stryker, “Solving Gauss’s Law on Digital Quantum Computers with Loop-String-Hadron Digitization,”Phys. Rev. Res.2no. 3, (2020) 033039,arXiv:1812.07554 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Trade-offs in Gauss’s law error correction for lattice gauge theory quantum simulations,

    B. Pato and N. Klco, “Trade-offs in Gauss’s law error correction for lattice gauge theory quantum simulations,”arXiv:2602.22121 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    A Theory of quantum error correcting codes,

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “A Theory of quantum error correcting codes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 2525–2528,arXiv:quant-ph/9604034

    work page arXiv 2000

  56. [56]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise,

    P. Aliferis and J. Preskill, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation against biased noise,”Phys. Rev. A78no. 5, (2008) . 94

    2008

  57. [57]

    Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits,

    S. Puri et al., “Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits,”Sci. Adv.6no. 34, (2020) aay5901,arXiv:1905.00450 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Rothlin,Exploring the Connection between Gauge Theory and Quantum Error Correction via Quantum Reference Frames

    E. Rothlin,Exploring the Connection between Gauge Theory and Quantum Error Correction via Quantum Reference Frames. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-c-000784853

    work page doi:10.3929/ethz-c-000784853 2025

  59. [59]

    Error correction in lattice quantum electrodynamics with quantum reference frames,

    E. Rothlin, C. Ferradini, and L.-Q. Chen, “Error correction in lattice quantum electrodynamics with quantum reference frames,”simultaneously submitted to the arXiv(2026)

    2026

  60. [60]

    Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction

    D. Gottesman, “Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,”arXiv:quant-ph/9705052

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  61. [61]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 10th ed., 2010

    2010

  62. [62]

    An introduction to quantum error correction and fault- tolerant quantum computation.arXiv preprint arXiv:0904.2557, 2009

    D. Gottesman, “An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation,”arXiv:0904.2557 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Quantum error correction on infinite-dimensional hilbert spaces,

    C. B´ eny, A. Kempf, and D. W. Kribs, “Quantum error correction on infinite-dimensional hilbert spaces,”J. Math. Phys.50no. 6, (2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Entropy gain and the choi-jamiolkowski correspondence for infinite-dimensional quantum evolutions,

    A. S. Holevo, “Entropy gain and the choi-jamiolkowski correspondence for infinite-dimensional quantum evolutions,”Theor. Math. Phys.166no. 1, (2011) 123–138

    2011

  65. [65]

    Standard form of qudit stabilizer groups,

    V. Gheorghiu, “Standard form of qudit stabilizer groups,”Phys. Lett. A378no. 5-6, (2014) 505–509,arXiv:1101.1519 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Nonbinary quantum codes,

    E. M. Rains, “Nonbinary quantum codes,”IEEE Trans. Info. Theor.45no. 6, (1999) 1827–1832, arXiv:quant-ph/9703048

    work page arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    302–313, arXiv:quant-ph/9802007 [quant-ph]

    D. Gottesman, “Fault tolerant quantum computation with higher dimensional systems,”Chaos Solitons Fractals10(1999) 1749–1758,arXiv:quant-ph/9802007

    work page arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    Nonbinary quantum stabilizer codes,

    A. Ashikhmin and E. Knill, “Nonbinary quantum stabilizer codes,”IEEE Trans. Info. Theor.47 no. 7, (2001) 3065–3072,arXiv:quant-ph/0005008

    work page arXiv 2001

  69. [69]

    Modular-qudit stabilizer code,

    “Modular-qudit stabilizer code,” inThe Error Correction Zoo, V. V. Albert and P. Faist, eds. 2022.https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/qudit_stabilizer

    2022

  70. [70]

    Qudits and High-Dimensional Quantum Computing,

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, “Qudits and High-Dimensional Quantum Computing,”Front. in Phys.8(2020) 589504,arXiv:2008.00959 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories,

    D. Bacon, “Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories,”Phys. Rev. A73no. 1, (2006) 012340,arXiv:quant-ph/0506023

    work page arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,

    P. W. Shor, “Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory,”Phys. Rev. A52 no. 4, (1995) R2493–R2496

    1995

  73. [73]

    Operator quantum error correction,

    D. W. Kribs, R. Laflamme, D. Poulin, and M. Lesosky, “Operator quantum error correction,” Quant. Inf. Comput.6no. 4-5, (2006) 382–399,arXiv:quant-ph/0504189

    work page arXiv 2006

  74. [74]

    Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction,

    D. Poulin, “Stabilizer formalism for operator quantum error correction,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95 no. 23, (2005) . 95

    2005

  75. [75]

    Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer

    T. Byrnes and Y. Yamamoto, “Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer,”Phys. Rev. A73(2006) 022328,arXiv:quant-ph/0510027

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  76. [76]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, “Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices,”Rept. Prog. Phys.79no. 1, (2016) 014401, arXiv:1503.02312 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Zohar, Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, chal- lenges and methods, Phil

    E. Zohar, “Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension—requirements, challenges and methods,”Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.380 no. 2216, (2021) 20210069,arXiv:2106.04609 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and ˇC. Brukner, “Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,”Nature Commun.10no. 1, (2019) 494, arXiv:1712.07207 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Gauss’ law code

    “Gauss’ law code.”https://errorcorrectionzoo.org/c/gauss_law. The Error Correction Zoo

  80. [80]

    The Reconstruction of Gauge Potentials From Wilson Loops,

    R. Giles, “The Reconstruction of Gauge Potentials From Wilson Loops,”Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 2160

    1981

Showing first 80 references.