arxiv: 2604.06293 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.ed-ph · quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

The Quantum Education Ecosystem: A Review of Global Initiatives, Methods, and Challenges

Aryan Iliat, Russell R. Ceballos, Sara Ayman Metwalli, Steven Thomas, Suresh Nair, Zizwe A. Chase

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ed-ph quant-ph

keywords quantum educationQISEeducational ecosystemglobal initiativespedagogical strategiesworkforce developmentcurriculum challengesnon-linear progression

0 comments

The pith

Quantum education forms a non-linear ecosystem with multiple entry points and transition gaps rather than a straight pipeline.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews global quantum information science and engineering initiatives to map how learners move from initial exposure to advanced skills and workforce entry. It shows that current efforts are scattered across regions, school levels, and teaching styles, creating uneven progress and access. Viewing this landscape as an ecosystem instead of a linear sequence highlights feedback loops between stages and points where learners drop out or switch paths. This shift matters because it points to concrete places where new curricula, evaluations, and support can make quantum training more coherent and open to more people. The authors close by outlining steps to align education with fast-moving technology and job demands.

Core claim

Synthesizing data from international programs and academic literature shows that quantum education initiatives remain fragmented. The paper establishes that quantum education is more accurately conceptualized as a non-linear ecosystem rather than a traditional pipeline, characterized by multiple entry points, feedback mechanisms, and critical transition gaps. This perspective supports proposals for developing more coherent, inclusive, and scalable educational frameworks that align with workforce requirements and technological progress.

What carries the argument

The non-linear ecosystem model for quantum education, built from a dual framework of learner progression stages and instructional methods, which identifies entry points, feedback loops, and gaps through synthesis of global programs.

If this is right

Identifying specific transition gaps allows targeted programs to support learners moving between educational stages.
Addressing inequitable access can expand participation and produce a more diverse quantum workforce.
Creating standardized curricula would reduce fragmentation and improve the scalability of existing initiatives.
Conducting more empirical evaluations of teaching methods can guide which approaches best build practical skills.
Aligning frameworks with workforce needs supports faster preparation of technically proficient graduates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The ecosystem perspective may apply to education in other fast-growing technical fields such as artificial intelligence or biotechnology.
International coordination on shared learning outcomes could fill the documented gaps between secondary and higher education.
Longitudinal tracking of individual learner paths through different entry points would provide direct tests of the model.
Resource allocation might prioritize early-stage conceptual exposure to reduce later discontinuities.

Load-bearing premise

The synthesis of data from international programs and academic literature provides a representative, unbiased, and sufficiently comprehensive view of the global quantum education landscape.

What would settle it

A systematic global survey of quantum education pathways that reveals most learners follow a single linear sequence from early exposure through university to employment, with few alternative entry points or drop-off gaps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06293 by Aryan Iliat, Russell R. Ceballos, Sara Ayman Metwalli, Steven Thomas, Suresh Nair, Zizwe A. Chase.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Education initiatives pipeline from early age to workforce readiness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The distribution of quantum education papers on IEEE Explore [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Quantum information science and engineering (QISE) is advancing rapidly, creating an urgent demand for a quantum-literate, technically proficient workforce. Despite this need, quantum education initiatives remain fragmented across regions, educational levels, and instructional approaches, which constrains their scalability and overall impact. This paper offers a structured analysis of the current quantum education ecosystem by synthesizing global initiatives, pedagogical strategies, and emerging trends. Quantum education is examined through a dual framework that considers both learner progression and instructional methodology, emphasizing the evolution of educational approaches from conceptual exposure to formal reasoning and practical application. Analysis of data from international programs and academic literature reveals key challenges, including inequitable access, absence of standardized curricula, limited empirical evaluation, and discontinuities between educational stages. Quantum education is more accurately conceptualized as a non-linear ecosystem rather than a traditional pipeline, characterized by multiple entry points, feedback mechanisms, and critical transition gaps. Based on this perspective, directions are proposed for developing more coherent, inclusive, and scalable educational frameworks that align with workforce requirements and technological progress. This work presents a unified perspective on the quantum education landscape and outlines actionable strategies to enhance global quantum literacy and workforce preparedness.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review frames quantum education as a non-linear ecosystem with clear challenges but rests on an undocumented synthesis that leaves coverage gaps unaddressed.

read the letter

The main point is that the paper treats quantum education as an ecosystem with multiple entry points, feedback loops, and transition gaps rather than a straight pipeline, and it backs this with a synthesis of global programs plus a dual framework on learner progression and instructional methods. That framing is reasonable and organizes scattered efforts in one place, which could help people mapping workforce needs or spotting where programs drop off between high school and university or between theory and lab work. It does well at listing concrete issues like inequitable access, missing standards, weak empirical checks on what works, and stage discontinuities, and these line up with patterns seen in other fast-growing technical fields. The synthesis pulls in international examples and trends without obvious internal contradictions. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flagged: no search protocol, no databases or keywords listed, no inclusion criteria, and no discussion of regional balance. Without that, the ecosystem picture could reflect what was easiest to find rather than the full landscape, especially if non-Western or smaller programs are underrepresented. This is a review, so there are no derivations or new data to verify, just the claim that the collected sources support the framing. It is for educators, program directors, and policy folks who need a quick map of the field rather than for researchers hunting novel results or formal proofs. A reader already deep in quantum outreach will find it familiar but convenient; someone outside the area gets a usable starting overview. It deserves peer review because the topic is timely and the synthesis could coordinate efforts if the methods are tightened, though it needs a clear literature selection section before publication.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the quantum education landscape by synthesizing global initiatives, pedagogical strategies, and trends from international programs and academic literature. It introduces a dual framework analyzing both learner progression (from conceptual exposure to formal reasoning and practical application) and instructional methodology. The central claim is that quantum education is better conceptualized as a non-linear ecosystem—featuring multiple entry points, feedback mechanisms, and critical transition gaps—rather than a traditional linear pipeline. Key challenges identified include inequitable access, absence of standardized curricula, limited empirical evaluation, and discontinuities between educational stages. The paper proposes directions for developing more coherent, inclusive, and scalable frameworks aligned with workforce demands in quantum information science and engineering.

Significance. If the underlying synthesis proves representative and methodologically sound, this work offers a valuable unified perspective on a rapidly evolving but fragmented field. The ecosystem reframing and dual framework could meaningfully guide policy, curriculum design, and program development to address the urgent need for quantum-literate professionals. By highlighting specific, actionable challenges and transition gaps, the paper has the potential to influence global efforts toward improved quantum literacy and workforce preparedness.

major comments (1)

The synthesis of data from international programs and academic literature (described in the abstract and presumably detailed in the methods or data analysis section): the central claim that quantum education forms a non-linear ecosystem with challenges such as inequitable access and transition gaps rests on this synthesis being representative. However, no explicit systematic review protocol is provided, including search strategy, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or measures to ensure regional balance (e.g., coverage of non-Western initiatives). This is load-bearing because without it, the identified patterns may reflect selection effects rather than the true global landscape, weakening the ecosystem framing relative to a pipeline model.

minor comments (1)

The abstract could more explicitly preview the structure of the dual framework (learner progression vs. instructional methodology) to better orient readers before the full analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive feedback, which highlights an important opportunity to strengthen the methodological transparency of our synthesis. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate greater clarity on our approach.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The synthesis of data from international programs and academic literature (described in the abstract and presumably detailed in the methods or data analysis section): the central claim that quantum education forms a non-linear ecosystem with challenges such as inequitable access and transition gaps rests on this synthesis being representative. However, no explicit systematic review protocol is provided, including search strategy, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or measures to ensure regional balance (e.g., coverage of non-Western initiatives). This is load-bearing because without it, the identified patterns may reflect selection effects rather than the true global landscape, weakening the ecosystem framing relative to a pipeline model.

Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the synthesis process would improve rigor and allow readers to better assess representativeness. This manuscript is a narrative review drawing on prominent global initiatives and peer-reviewed literature known to the authors through their involvement in the quantum education community, rather than a formal systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. To address the concern, we will add a dedicated Methods section that describes the primary sources consulted (including arXiv, Google Scholar, and reports from organizations such as the National Q-12 Education Partnership, Quantum Flagship, and initiatives in Asia and Latin America), key search terms (e.g., 'quantum education', 'QISE workforce', 'quantum pedagogy'), approximate time frame (primarily 2015–2024), and criteria for inclusion focused on documented programs and empirical studies. We will also explicitly note limitations in regional coverage and how the ecosystem framing emerges from recurring patterns across these sources rather than claiming exhaustive global representation. This revision will support the central claim without overstating the synthesis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: descriptive review with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This paper is a narrative synthesis of external global initiatives and literature on quantum education. It contains no equations, mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems. The central framing of quantum education as a non-linear ecosystem is presented as an interpretive conclusion drawn from reviewed sources rather than derived by construction from the paper's own inputs or prior self-citations. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted data renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via citation. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks in the sense that its claims rest on cited programs and papers outside the present manuscript, with no internal loop that forces the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the central claim rests on standard practices of literature synthesis and domain assumptions about education frameworks rather than new parameters, axioms, or entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Quantum education initiatives can be systematically analyzed through a dual framework of learner progression and instructional methodology.
This framework is invoked to structure the examination of the ecosystem and evolution of approaches.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1222 out tokens · 41279 ms · 2026-05-10T18:33:37.341966+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Quantum cryptography.Reviews of modern physics, 74(1):145, 2002

Nicolas Gisin, Gr ´egoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden. Quantum cryptography.Reviews of modern physics, 74(1):145, 2002

2002
[2]

Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science.Chemical reviews, 120(22):12685–12717, 2020

Bela Bauer, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science.Chemical reviews, 120(22):12685–12717, 2020

2020
[3]

Q-12 education partnership: Framework and learning materials

National Q-12 Education Partnership. Q-12 education partnership: Framework and learning materials. https://q12education.org, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[4]

Accelerating undergraduate qise education and research by economy of scale: Qusteam nonprofit

Bennett Brown. Accelerating undergraduate qise education and research by economy of scale: Qusteam nonprofit. InAPS March Meeting Abstracts, volume 2024, pages Q61–001, 2024

2024
[5]

Chicago quantum exchange: Education and workforce development

Chicago Quantum Exchange. Chicago quantum exchange: Education and workforce development. https://chicagoquantum.org, 2024. Ac- cessed November 2025

2024
[6]

Qubit by qubit: Global quantum education programs

The Coding School and IBM Quantum. Qubit by qubit: Global quantum education programs. https://www.qubitbyqubit.org, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[7]

Quantum for educators program

University of Waterloo Institute for Quantum Computing. Quantum for educators program. https://uwaterloo.ca/ institute-for-quantum-computing, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[8]

Digiq: Digital europe programme for quantum education

European Commission DigiQ Project. Digiq: Digital europe programme for quantum education. https://digiq.eu/, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[9]

Qtindu: Quantum industry upskilling initiative

QTIndu Consortium. Qtindu: Quantum industry upskilling initiative. https://qtindu.eu, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[10]

R. D. King and colleagues. Teaching quantum computing through massive open online courses.EPJ Quantum Technology, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[11]

National quantum technologies pro- gramme (nqtp)

UK Research and Innovation. National quantum technologies pro- gramme (nqtp). https://uknqt.ukri.org, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[12]

Quantum for everyone: Global quantum literacy course

Quantum Delta NL. Quantum for everyone: Global quantum literacy course. https://quantumdelta.nl, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[13]

Quantum inspire and qutech academy learning platform

QuTech Academy. Quantum inspire and qutech academy learning platform. https://qutechacademy.nl/, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[14]

Quantum technology innovation hubs

Quantum Technology Innovation Hubs (QIH). Quantum technology innovation hubs. https://qih.riken.jp/en/, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[15]

Cqt outreach and education

National University of Singapore Centre for Quantum Technologies. Cqt outreach and education. https://www.quantumlah.org/outreach, 2024. Accessed November 2025

2024
[16]

Ibm asia quantum education network

IBM Research. Ibm asia quantum education network. https:// research.ibm.com/blog/japan-korea-us-quantum-education, 2024. Ac- cessed November 2025

2024
[17]

Exploring gamification in quantum computing: The qubit factory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11995, 2024

Glen Evenbly. Exploring gamification in quantum computing: The qubit factory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11995, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

Qubits for the kids

Ed Kuijpers, Swantje Kastrup, Jasper van de Kraats, Robert de Keijzer, Zhichao Guo, Marıa Gragera Garc´es, and Vesna Manojlovic. Qubits for the kids. 2022

2022
[19]

Quantum physics literacy aimed at k12 and the general public

Caterina Foti, Daria Anttila, Sabrina Maniscalco, and Maria Luisa Chiofalo. Quantum physics literacy aimed at k12 and the general public. Universe, 7(4):86, 2021

2021
[20]

The quantum for all project: Teacher professional development model.EDULEARN23 Proceedings, pages 3337–3345, 2023

Karen Matsler and Ramon Lopez. The quantum for all project: Teacher professional development model.EDULEARN23 Proceedings, pages 3337–3345, 2023

2023
[21]

Enhancing student learning of two-level quantum systems with interactive simulations.American Journal of Physics, 83(6):560–566, 2015

Antje Kohnle, Charles Baily, Anna Campbell, Natalia Korolkova, and Mark J Paetkau. Enhancing student learning of two-level quantum systems with interactive simulations.American Journal of Physics, 83(6):560–566, 2015

2015
[22]

Visualizing quantum mechanics in an interac- tive simulation–virtual lab by quantum flytrap.Optical Engineering, 61(8):081808–081808, 2022

Piotr Migdał, Klementyna Jankiewicz, Paweł Grabarz, Chiara Decaroli, and Philippe Cochin. Visualizing quantum mechanics in an interac- tive simulation–virtual lab by quantum flytrap.Optical Engineering, 61(8):081808–081808, 2022

2022
[23]

Qscratch: introduction to quantum mechanics concepts through block-based programming.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):12, 2025

Daniel Escanez-Exposito, Marcos Rodriguez-Vega, Carlos Rosa- Remedios, and Pino Caballero-Gil. Qscratch: introduction to quantum mechanics concepts through block-based programming.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):12, 2025

2025
[24]

On block structures in quantum computation.Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 298:233–255, 2013

Bart Jacobs. On block structures in quantum computation.Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 298:233–255, 2013

2013
[25]

https://physicsworld.com/a/ quantum-themed-escape-room-opens-at-german-science-museum/,

Quantum-themed escape room opens at ger- man science museum. https://physicsworld.com/a/ quantum-themed-escape-room-opens-at-german-science-museum/,
[26]

[Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[27]

https: //condensate.physics.illinois.edu/stories/fall2017/Escape Room goes quantum physics Urbana, 2025

Escape room goes quantum physics in urbana. https: //condensate.physics.illinois.edu/stories/fall2017/Escape Room goes quantum physics Urbana, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[28]

Quantum computing for high-school students an experience report

Prashanti Priya Angara, Ulrike Stege, and Andrew MacLean. Quantum computing for high-school students an experience report. In2020 IEEE international conference on quantum computing and engineering (QCE), pages 323–329. IEEE, 2020

2020
[29]

Teaching quantum computing to high- school-aged youth: a hands-on approach.IEEE Transactions on Quan- tum Engineering, 3:1–15, 2021

Prashanti Priya Angara, Ulrike Stege, Andrew MacLean, Hausi A M¨uller, and Tom Markham. Teaching quantum computing to high- school-aged youth: a hands-on approach.IEEE Transactions on Quan- tum Engineering, 3:1–15, 2021

2021
[30]

https://qworld.net/ nyuad-course-2025/, 2025

Qworld nyu abu dhabi course 2025. https://qworld.net/ nyuad-course-2025/, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[31]

Quantum sensing summer program

Chicago State University. Quantum sensing summer program. https:// www.csu.edu/summerprograms/quantum sensing.htm, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[32]

Quantenkoffer® – quantum physics science kit

qutools GmbH. Quantenkoffer® – quantum physics science kit. https: //qutools.com/quantenkoffer science-kit/, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[33]

Teaching quantum information science to high-school and early undergraduate students.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07874, 2020

Sophia E Economou, Terry Rudolph, and Edwin Barnes. Teaching quantum information science to high-school and early undergraduate students.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07874, 2020

work page arXiv 2005
[34]

Building a quantum engineering undergraduate program.IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2):220–242, 2022

Abraham Asfaw, Alexandre Blais, Kenneth R Brown, Jonathan Cande- laria, Christopher Cantwell, Lincoln D Carr, Joshua Combes, Dripto M Debroy, John M Donohue, Sophia E Economou, et al. Building a quantum engineering undergraduate program.IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(2):220–242, 2022

2022
[35]

Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities

Marcia C Linn, Erin Palmer, Anne Baranger, Elizabeth Gerard, and Elisa Stone. Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222):1261757, 2015

2015
[36]

Alaina J Buchanan and Ginger R Fisher. Current status and imple- mentation of science practices in course-based undergraduate research experiences (cures): a systematic literature review.CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4):ar83, 2022

2022
[37]

Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.Science, 316(5824):548–549, 2007

Susan H Russell, Mary P Hancock, and James McCullough. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.Science, 316(5824):548–549, 2007

2007
[38]

Summer schools on qt for students as a long-term educational strategy

Massimiliano Malgieri, Chiara Macchiavello, Claudio Sutrini, Giacomo Zuccarini, and Maria Bondani. Summer schools on qt for students as a long-term educational strategy
[39]

https://qusteam.org/ qusteam-curriculum, 2025

Qusteam curriculum for quantum education. https://qusteam.org/ qusteam-curriculum, 2025. [Accessed 20-03-2025]

2025
[40]

Outcomes from a workshop on a national center for quantum education.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):40, 2025

Edwin Barnes, Michael B Bennett, Alexandra Boltasseva, Victoria Borish, Bennett Brown, Lincoln D Carr, Russell R Ceballos, Faith Dukes, Emily W Easton, Sophia E Economou, et al. Outcomes from a workshop on a national center for quantum education.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):40, 2025

2025
[41]

Quantum undergraduate education and scientific training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13850, 2021

Justin K Perron, Charles DeLeone, Shahed Sharif, Tom Carter, Joshua M Grossman, Gina Passante, and Joshua Sack. Quantum undergraduate education and scientific training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13850, 2021

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

Educators needed for a quantum future

Justin Perron and Shahed Sharif. Educators needed for a quantum future. Physics, 16:59, 2023

2023
[43]

Development of an undergraduate quantum engineering degree

Andrew S Dzurak, Julien Epps, Arne Laucht, Robert Malaney, Andrea Morello, Hendra I Nurdin, Jarryd J Pla, Andre Saraiva, and Chih Hwan Yang. Development of an undergraduate quantum engineering degree. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 3:1–10, 2022

2022
[44]

How faculty enablement strategies can improve diversity in quantum education.Nature Reviews Materials, 8(1):1–2, 2023

Kayla Lee. How faculty enablement strategies can improve diversity in quantum education.Nature Reviews Materials, 8(1):1–2, 2023

2023
[45]

Beginnings: Building educational growth for industry (begin) learning quantum literacy, quantum ai, and quantum machine learning

National Science Foundation. Beginnings: Building educational growth for industry (begin) learning quantum literacy, quantum ai, and quantum machine learning. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD ID=2347101, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[46]

Qworld: A global quantum computing community and educational initiative

QWorld Initiative. Qworld: A global quantum computing community and educational initiative. https://qworld.net, 2024. Accessed: 2026-04- 03

2024
[47]

Unitary fund: Supporting open-source quantum technol- ogy development

Unitary Fund. Unitary fund: Supporting open-source quantum technol- ogy development. https://unitary.fund, 2024. Accessed: 2026-04-03

2024
[48]

The european quantum technologies flagship programme.Quantum Science and Technology, 2(3):030501, 2017

Max F Riedel, Daniele Binosi, Rob Thew, and Tommaso Calarco. The european quantum technologies flagship programme.Quantum Science and Technology, 2(3):030501, 2017

2017
[49]

The us national quantum initiative.Quantum Science and Technology, 4(2):020504, 2019

Michael G Raymer and Christopher Monroe. The us national quantum initiative.Quantum Science and Technology, 4(2):020504, 2019

2019
[50]

Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initia- tive.PRX Quantum, 3(2):020101, 2022

Alexia Auff `eves. Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initia- tive.PRX Quantum, 3(2):020101, 2022

2022
[51]

Cern quantum technology initiative strategy and roadmap

Alberto Di Meglio, Michael Doser, Dorota Maria Grabowska, Sofia Vallecorsa, Benjamin Frisch, and Maurizio Pierini. Cern quantum technology initiative strategy and roadmap. Technical report, 2021

2021
[52]

Focus on quantum science and technology initiatives around the world.Quantum Sci

Rob Thew, Thomas Jennewein, and Masahide Sasaki. Focus on quantum science and technology initiatives around the world.Quantum Sci. Technol, 5(1):010201, 2019

2019
[53]

Building a quantum-ready ecosystem.IET Quantum Communication, 5(1):1–18, 2024

Abhishek Purohit, Maninder Kaur, Zeki Can Seskir, Matthew T Posner, and Araceli Venegas-Gomez. Building a quantum-ready ecosystem.IET Quantum Communication, 5(1):1–18, 2024

2024
[54]

https://chicagoquantum.org/, 2025

Chicago quantum exchange. https://chicagoquantum.org/, 2025. [Ac- cessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[55]

Quan- tum computing for high school: an approach to interdisciplinary in stem for teaching

Sara Satanassi, Paola Fantini, Roberta Spada, and Olivia Levrini. Quan- tum computing for high school: an approach to interdisciplinary in stem for teaching. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 1929, page 012053. IOP Publishing, 2021

1929
[56]

Majidy, Addressing Misconceptions in University Physics: A Review and Experiences from Quantum Physics Educators, arXiv:2405.20923 [physics.ed-ph] (2025)

Shayan Majidy. Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20923, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Quantum for everyone: Global course launch

ITU, UNICC, and Quantum Delta NL. Quantum for everyone: Global course launch. https://thequantuminsider.com/2025/10/06/ quantum-for-everyone-a-new-global-course-launches-to-promote-\ quantum-literacy, 2025. Accessed November 2025

2025
[58]

MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative Chicago, IL, 2008

James Paul Gee.Learning and games. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative Chicago, IL, 2008

2008
[59]

Douglas A Gentile, Craig A Anderson, Shintaro Yukawa, Nobuko Ihori, Muniba Saleem, Lim Kam Ming, Akiko Shibuya, Albert K Liau, Angeline Khoo, Brad J Bushman, et al. The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies.Personality and Social Psychol- ogy Bulletin, 35(...

2009
[60]

Exploring the creative potential of values conscious game design: Students’ experiences with the vap curriculum.Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1):57– 67, 2010

Jonathan Belman and Mary Flanagan. Exploring the creative potential of values conscious game design: Students’ experiences with the vap curriculum.Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1):57– 67, 2010

2010
[61]

Quantum picturalism.Contemporary physics, 51(1):59–83, 2010

Bob Coecke. Quantum picturalism.Contemporary physics, 51(1):59–83, 2010

2010
[62]

Niel’s chess: A quantum game for schools and the general public

Tam ´as Varga. Niel’s chess: A quantum game for schools and the general public. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), volume 3, pages 53–60. IEEE, 2024

2024
[63]

Quantum tic-tac-toe- learning the concepts of quantum mechanics in a playful way.Computers and Education Open, 4:100125, 2023

Maurice Weing ¨artner and Tim Weing ¨artner. Quantum tic-tac-toe- learning the concepts of quantum mechanics in a playful way.Computers and Education Open, 4:100125, 2023

2023
[64]

The history of quantum games

Laura J Piispanen, Edward Morrell, Solip Park, Marcel Pfaffhauser, and Annakaisa Kultima. The history of quantum games. In2023 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2023

2023
[65]

Defining quantum games.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):7, 2025

Laura Piispanen, Marcel Pfaffhauser, James Wootton, Julian Togelius, and Annakaisa Kultima. Defining quantum games.EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1):7, 2025

2025
[66]

https://phet.colorado

Phet interactive simulations: Math and statistics. https://phet.colorado. edu/en/simulations/filter?subjects=math-and-statistics&type=html,
[67]

[Accessed 20-03-2025]

2025
[68]

Quantum composer: A programmable quantum visualization and simulation tool for education and research.American Journal of Physics, 89(3):307–316, 2021

Shaeema Zaman Ahmed, Jesper Hasseriis Mohr Jensen, Carrie Ann Weidner, Jens Jakob Sørensen, Marcel Mudrich, and Jacob Friis Sher- son. Quantum composer: A programmable quantum visualization and simulation tool for education and research.American Journal of Physics, 89(3):307–316, 2021

2021
[69]

Virtual quantum optics laboratory (vqol)

Applied Research Laboratories, The University of Texas at Austin. Virtual quantum optics laboratory (vqol). https://www.vqol.org/, 2025. [Accessed 29-03-2025]

2025
[70]

Virtual lab by quantum flytrap: interactive simulation of quantum mechanics

Klementyna Jankiewicz, Piotr Migdal, and Pawel Grabarz. Virtual lab by quantum flytrap: interactive simulation of quantum mechanics. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pages 1–4, 2022

2022
[71]

Venus: A geometrical representation for quantum state visualization

Shaolun Ruan, Ribo Yuan, Qiang Guan, Yanna Lin, Ying Mao, Weiwen Jiang, Zhepeng Wang, Wei Xu, and Yong Wang. Venus: A geometrical representation for quantum state visualization. InComputer Graphics F orum, volume 42, pages 247–258. Wiley Online Library, 2023

2023
[72]

Quaver: Quantum unfoldment through visual engagement and storytelling resources.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11511, 2023

Ishan Shivansh Bangroo and Samia Amir. Quaver: Quantum unfoldment through visual engagement and storytelling resources.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11511, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[73]

https://content.luanti

Qiskitblocks: Interactive quantum learning tool. https://content.luanti. org/packages/javafxpert/qiskitblocks/, 2025. [Accessed 20-03-2025]

2025
[74]

https://www

Tinkerqubits: Quantum computing learning platform. https://www. tinkerqubits.org/, 2025. [Accessed 20-03-2025]

2025
[75]

Packt Publishing Ltd, 2025

Robert Loredo.Learn Quantum Computing with Python and IBM Quantum: Write your own practical quantum programs with Python. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2025

2025
[76]

Introducing microsoft quantum computing for developers

Johnny Hooyberghs. Introducing microsoft quantum computing for developers. 2022

2022
[77]

Quantum mechanics curriculum in the us: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used.Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1):010102, 2025

Alexis Buzzell, Timothy J Atherton, and Ram ´on Barthelemy. Quantum mechanics curriculum in the us: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used.Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1):010102, 2025

2025
[78]

Nielsen and Isaac L

Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 10th anniversary edition edition, 2010

2010
[79]

Number 47

Alexei Yu Kitaev, Alexander Shen, and Mikhail N Vyalyi.Classical and quantum computation. Number 47. American Mathematical Soc., 2002

2002
[80]

Fabian Hennig, Krist ´of T ´oth, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer. Mathematical sense making of quantum phenomena using dirac nota- tion: its effect on secondary school students’ functional thinking about photons.EPJ Quantum Technology, 11(1):61, 2024

2024

Showing first 80 references.