arxiv: 2604.06307 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-lat

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d

Zhiyao Lu , Sahand Seifnashri , Shu-Heng Shao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat

keywords lattice chiral symmetrybosonic lattice modelaxion-like couplinghigher-form symmetrynon-invertible symmetry2-group symmetrychiral anomaly

0 comments

The pith

A solvable lattice Hamiltonian with bosons realizes exact chiral symmetry that matches the continuum axion theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a solvable model on the lattice using bosonic degrees of freedom that preserves an exact U(1)_V times U(1)_A chiral symmetry. This avoids the usual no-go theorems that apply to fermionic lattices. In the continuum limit, it becomes a compact scalar field with an axion-like term, where the axial symmetry transmutes into a higher-form symmetry. The model also reproduces the chiral anomaly when the vector symmetry is gauged, as an axial rotation shifts the effective theta angle. This provides a way to study chiral phenomena on the lattice without fermions.

Core claim

The central claim is that a Hamiltonian built from lattice bosons can enforce exact chiral U(1)_V × U(1)_A symmetry at finite lattice spacing. The U(1)_V symmetry shifts the scalar field while U(1)_A acts on short axion string operators, becoming a 1-form symmetry in the continuum. When U(1)_V is gauged, axial rotations shift the lattice theta angle, demonstrating the anomaly, and gauging either symmetry produces non-invertible or 2-group symmetries on the lattice consistent with continuum expectations.

What carries the argument

The solvable Hamiltonian that realizes the exact lattice chiral symmetry using bosonic operators associated with axion strings.

If this is right

The lattice model evades Nielsen-Ninomiya no-go theorems by using bosons instead of fermions.
Gauging the vector symmetry leads to non-invertible symmetries on the lattice.
Gauging the axial symmetry leads to 2-group symmetries.
The chiral anomaly is realized through the shift in the lattice theta angle under axial rotations.
The continuum limit reproduces the compact boson theory with axion coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This approach might enable lattice studies of chiral gauge theories that were previously obstructed by no-go theorems.
Similar bosonic constructions could apply to other anomalous symmetries or in different spacetime dimensions.
The use of axion-string operators suggests possible connections to topological phases with string-like defects.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice model has a well-defined continuum limit that reproduces the compact boson field theory with the axion-like coupling and the transmuted symmetries.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that an axial rotation on the lattice shifts the theta angle by the expected amount when the vector symmetry is gauged, or verifying the absence of the symmetry in the continuum limit if the assumption fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06307 by Sahand Seifnashri, Shu-Heng Shao, Zhiyao Lu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The axial charge of the short string e ibℓ on a link ℓ is determined by the values of dw on the two adjacent plaquettes t(ℓ) and t −1 (ℓ), whose centers are displaced from the link center by half-lattice translations ±( 1 2 , 1 2 , 1 2 ). The axial U(1)A symmetry acts on the local operator e ibℓ at link ℓ as ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Sites, links and plaquettes as 0-, 1-, and 2-cells. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Illustration of the boundary operator ∂ : Cn+1(Λ, Z) → Cn(Λ, Z) in (A.3), as well as the exterior derivative d : C n (Λ, R) → C n+1(Λ, R) in (A.12) with n = 0, 1, 2. The colors in this figure match the ones in (A.3) and (A.12). We define a boundary operator ∂ that acts on n-cells in the following way, ∂cn(⃗r)i1···in = Xn k=1 (−1)k+1 h cn−1(⃗r +ˆik)i1···˚ik···in − cn−1(⃗r)i1···˚ik···in i , (A.3) where˚i den… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Illustration of the coboundary operator ˆ∂ : Cn−1(Λ, Z) → Cn(Λ, Z) in (A.4), as well as the divergence operator δ : C n (Λ, R) → C n−1 (Λ, R) in (A.13) with n = 1, 2, 3 in a 3-dimensional lattice. The colors in this figure match the ones in (A.4) and (A.13). For d-cells, we define ˆ∂cd(⃗r)1···d = 0. ˆ∂ extends linearly to a homomorphism Cn(Λ, Z) → Cn+1(Λ, Z). See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Examples of the half lattice translation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Examples of the cup product in 1 and 2 dimensions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Examples of the cup product in 3 dimensions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a solvable Hamiltonian that realizes an exact lattice chiral $U(1)_V \times U(1)_A$ symmetry. Nielsen-Ninomiya-type no-go theorems are evaded by using lattice bosons rather than fermions. The continuum limit is a compact boson field theory with an axion-like coupling. The $U(1)_V$ symmetry shifts the scalar, while $U(1)_A$ acts on local operators associated with short axion strings and is transmuted into a higher-form symmetry in the continuum limit. We demonstrate the chiral anomaly by showing that the lattice theta angle is shifted by an axial rotation when $U(1)_V$ is gauged. Gauging either $U(1)_V$ or $U(1)_A$ leads to lattice non-invertible and 2-group symmetries, respectively, matching the continuum picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This gives a clean bosonic lattice Hamiltonian with exact chiral U(1)V × U(1)A symmetry, but the continuum limit to a compact boson with axion coupling is asserted without a derivation.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a solvable bosonic lattice model in 3+1d that keeps exact vector and axial U(1) symmetries. This evades the usual Nielsen-Ninomiya obstructions by dropping fermions altogether, and the lattice anomaly is shown by a theta-angle shift once U(1)V is gauged. That part of the construction is new and direct enough to check by hand on the lattice. Gauging either symmetry also produces the expected non-invertible or 2-group structures, which is a nice consistency check with continuum expectations. The Hamiltonian itself appears explicit and solvable, so readers can verify the symmetry actions without extra assumptions. The soft spot is the continuum limit. The paper states that the model flows to a compact boson with an axion-like term and that the axial symmetry transmutes into a higher-form symmetry, but there is no RG flow, duality map, or correlation-function calculation supplied to show that the lattice degrees of freedom reduce exactly to that theory rather than to something with extra relevant operators. The stress-test note is accurate on this point. Without that step the symmetry transmutation and anomaly matching remain formal lattice statements. This is for lattice gauge theorists and people working on anomaly matching or quantum simulation of chiral fermions. A reader who wants a concrete bosonic starting point will find it useful even if they have to fill in the continuum details themselves. I would send it to peer review. The lattice construction is honest and the anomaly demonstration is straightforward, but referees should ask for more evidence on the limit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a solvable lattice Hamiltonian in 3+1d that realizes an exact chiral U(1)_V × U(1)_A symmetry using bosonic degrees of freedom, thereby evading Nielsen-Ninomiya no-go theorems. The continuum limit is asserted to be a compact boson theory with an axion-like coupling; U(1)_V shifts the scalar while U(1)_A acts on short axion strings and transmutes into a higher-form symmetry. The chiral anomaly is demonstrated by a shift in the lattice theta angle under axial rotations after gauging U(1)_V. Gauging either symmetry produces lattice non-invertible or 2-group symmetries that match the continuum picture.

Significance. If the central claims are established, the work supplies a bosonic lattice regularization of chiral symmetries, anomalies, and generalized symmetries in 3+1d. The solvability of the Hamiltonian and the explicit lattice realization of non-invertible/2-group structures after gauging are concrete strengths that could aid studies of axion physics and higher-form symmetries.

major comments (2)

[Continuum limit and symmetry transmutation discussion] The identification of the continuum limit as the compact boson with axion-like coupling (and the associated symmetry transmutation) is asserted without an explicit derivation. No duality mapping, renormalization-group flow, or correlation-function calculation is supplied to show that the lattice degrees of freedom reduce precisely to the claimed theory rather than to a different phase or one with additional relevant operators. This step is load-bearing for the anomaly matching and higher-form symmetry claims.
[Anomaly and gauging sections] The anomaly demonstration (lattice theta-angle shift under axial rotation after gauging U(1)_V) and the subsequent non-invertible/2-group structures rely on the explicit form of the Hamiltonian and the gauging procedure. Without these details being presented in a verifiable manner, it is not possible to confirm that the anomaly is captured correctly and that no extraneous lattice artifacts survive.

minor comments (1)

[Symmetry action on operators] Define the local operators associated with short axion strings and specify how U(1)_A acts on them at the lattice level.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised are helpful for clarifying the presentation of the continuum limit and the anomaly calculations. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Continuum limit and symmetry transmutation discussion] The identification of the continuum limit as the compact boson with axion-like coupling (and the associated symmetry transmutation) is asserted without an explicit derivation. No duality mapping, renormalization-group flow, or correlation-function calculation is supplied to show that the lattice degrees of freedom reduce precisely to the claimed theory rather than to a different phase or one with additional relevant operators. This step is load-bearing for the anomaly matching and higher-form symmetry claims.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit derivation of the continuum limit. The current identification rests on the exact solvability of the Hamiltonian, which allows complete diagonalization showing a single gapless mode whose dispersion and operator content match those of a compact boson, together with the precise matching of the U(1)_V and U(1)_A symmetries and the anomaly. The axion-like coupling emerges directly from the lattice definition of the short-string operators. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an explicit correlation-function calculation or duality map is not supplied. In the revised version we will add a new subsection that computes the two-point functions of the lattice scalar and string operators in the infrared and demonstrates their agreement with the continuum compact-boson theory, including the axion term. This addition will also make the symmetry transmutation explicit. revision: yes
Referee: [Anomaly and gauging sections] The anomaly demonstration (lattice theta-angle shift under axial rotation after gauging U(1)_V) and the subsequent non-invertible/2-group structures rely on the explicit form of the Hamiltonian and the gauging procedure. Without these details being presented in a verifiable manner, it is not possible to confirm that the anomaly is captured correctly and that no extraneous lattice artifacts survive.

Authors: The Hamiltonian is stated explicitly in Eq. (1) and the gauging procedure, including the modified plaquette and vertex terms, is given in Section III. The anomaly is obtained by direct computation of the commutator of the axial rotation with the gauged Hamiltonian, which produces the expected shift of the lattice theta angle. We agree that additional intermediate steps would make the calculation easier to verify and would help rule out possible lattice artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will expand the anomaly section with a step-by-step derivation of the theta-angle shift, including the explicit action of the axial operator on each term of the gauged Hamiltonian and a brief discussion of why no extraneous operators are generated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct lattice Hamiltonian construction with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper defines an explicit solvable lattice Hamiltonian and demonstrates its exact U(1)_V × U(1)_A symmetries by direct construction on the lattice degrees of freedom. The continuum limit identification, anomaly matching via gauging, and transmutation to higher-form symmetries are argued from the lattice operators and their actions rather than from any fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior results that reduce the claim to a tautology. No step equates a derived quantity to an input by definition or renames a known result as a new prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract implies standard lattice field theory assumptions but provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The lattice model admits a continuum limit matching compact boson theory with axion coupling
Invoked to connect lattice construction to continuum anomaly and symmetry statements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1101 out tokens · 37204 ms · 2026-05-10T18:37:28.337419+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

The continuum limit is a compact boson field theory with an axion-like coupling... U(1)A acts on local operators associated with short axion strings and is transmuted into a higher-form symmetry

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

D. B. Kaplan,Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing, pp. 223–272, 12, 2009.arXiv:0912.2560

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[2]

H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,Nucl. Phys. B185(1981) 20. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 195, 541 (1982)]

1981
[3]

H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof,Nucl. Phys. B193(1981) 173–194

1981
[4]

H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions, Phys. Lett. B105(1981) 219–223

1981
[5]

Friedan,A PROOF OF THE NIELSEN-NINOMIYA THEOREM,Commun

D. Friedan,A PROOF OF THE NIELSEN-NINOMIYA THEOREM,Commun. Math. Phys.85(1982) 481–490

1982
[6]

Fidkowski and C

L. Fidkowski and C. Xu,A No-Go Result for Implementing Chiral Symmetries by Locality-Preserving Unitaries in a Three-Dimensional Hamiltonian Lattice Model of Fermions,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 19 196601, [arXiv:2306.10105]

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Sopenko,Anomalous Symmetries of Quantum Spin Chains and a Generalization of the Lieb–Schultz–Mattis Theorem,Commun. Math. Phys.406 (2025), no. 10 238, [arXiv:2401.02533]

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Liu,Anomalies in quantum spin systems and Nielsen-Ninomiya type Theorems, 2602.13948

R. Liu,Anomalies in quantum spin systems and Nielsen-Ninomiya type Theorems, arXiv:2602.13948. 54

work page arXiv
[9]

D. J. Gross and I. R. Klebanov,ONE-DIMENSIONAL STRING THEORY ON A CIRCLE,Nucl. Phys. B344(1990) 475–498

1990
[10]

Sulejmanpasic and C

T. Sulejmanpasic and C. Gattringer,Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles,Nucl. Phys. B943(2019) 114616, [arXiv:1901.02637]

work page arXiv 2019
[11]

Gorantla, H.T

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao,A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories,J. Math. Phys.62(2021), no. 10 102301, [arXiv:2103.01257]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

DeMarco, E

M. DeMarco, E. Lake, and X.-G. Wen,A Lattice Chiral Boson Theory in1 + 1d, arXiv:2305.03024

work page arXiv
[13]

Berkowitz, A

E. Berkowitz, A. Cherman, and T. Jacobson,Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 1 014510, [arXiv:2310.17539]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,

M. Cheng and N. Seiberg,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 2 051, [arXiv:2211.12543]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Fazza and T

L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic,Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities, JHEP05(2023) 017, [arXiv:2211.13047]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Thorngren, J

R. Thorngren, J. Preskill, and L. Fidkowski,Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories from Symmetry Disentanglers,arXiv:2601.04304

work page arXiv
[17]

Seifnashri,Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, arXiv:2601.14359 [hep-th]

S. Seifnashri,Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories, arXiv:2601.14359

work page arXiv
[18]

Generalized Global Symmetries

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172, [arXiv:1412.5148]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[19]

McGreevy, Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 57 (2023), arXiv:2204.03045

J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57–82, [arXiv:2204.03045]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Cordova, T

C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao,Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond, inSnowmass 2021, 5, 2022.arXiv:2205.09545

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,

S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1063(2024) 1–55, [arXiv:2305.18296]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

T. D. Brennan and S. Hong,Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,arXiv:2306.00912

work page arXiv
[23]

Lectures on generalized symmetries,

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051 (2024) 1–87, [arXiv:2307.07547]. 55

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry, 8, 2023.arXiv:2308.00747

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Simons Lectures on Categorical Sym- metries,

D. Costa et al.,Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries, 11, 2024. arXiv:2411.09082

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

Shao,Noninvertible symmetries: What’s done cannot be undone,Physics Today 78(2025), no

S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible symmetries: What’s done cannot be undone,Physics Today 78(2025), no. 7 30–35

2025
[27]

Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,

J. Kaidi,Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,arXiv:2603.08798

work page arXiv
[28]

Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 16 161601, [arXiv:2205.05086]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,

C. Cordova and K. Ohmori,Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,Phys. Rev. X13(2023), no. 1 011034, [arXiv:2205.06243]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Fidkowski, C

L. Fidkowski, C. Xu, and C. Zhang,Non-invertible bosonic chiral symmetry on the lattice,arXiv:2510.17969

work page arXiv
[31]

S. L. Adler,Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2426–2438

1969
[32]

J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel,Nuovo Cim. A 60(1969) 47–61

1969
[33]

A. Y. Kitaev,Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons,Annals Phys.303 (2003) 2–30, [quant-ph/9707021]

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[34]

Seiberg and S

N. Seiberg and S. Seifnashri,Symmetry transmutation and anomaly matching,JHEP 09(2025) 014, [arXiv:2505.08618]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

C´ ordova and K

C. C´ ordova and K. Ohmori,Anomaly Obstructions to Symmetry Preserving Gapped Phases,arXiv:1910.04962

work page arXiv 1910
[36]

D. G. Delmastro, J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, and Z. Komargodski,Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 3 079, [arXiv:2206.15118]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

T. D. Brennan, C. Cordova, and T. T. Dumitrescu,Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies,arXiv:2206.15401

work page arXiv
[38]

Antinucci, F

A. Antinucci, F. Benini, and G. Rizi,Holographic Duals of Symmetry Broken Phases, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024), no. 12 2400172, [arXiv:2408.01418]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

T. T. Dumitrescu, P. Niro, and R. Thorngren,Symmetry Breaking from Monopole Condensation in QED 3,arXiv:2410.05366

work page arXiv
[40]

T. D. Brennan, T. Jacobson, and K. Roumpedakis,Consequences of symmetry fractionalization without 1-form global symmetries,JHEP11(2025) 153, [arXiv:2504.08036]. 56

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

On gauging finite subgroups,

Y. Tachikawa,On gauging finite subgroups,SciPost Phys.8(2020), no. 1 015, [arXiv:1712.09542]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries

C. C´ ordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator,Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries,JHEP02(2019) 184, [arXiv:1802.04790]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[43]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 12 125016, [arXiv:2111.01139]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Honda, S

Y. Honda, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki,Action of the Axial U(1) Non-Invertible Symmetry on the ’t Hooft Line Operator: A Lattice Gauge Theory Study,PTEP 2024(2024), no. 7 073B04, [arXiv:2403.16752]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

Honda, S

Y. Honda, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki,Action of the Axial U(1) Noninvertible Symmetry on the ’t Hooft Line Operator: A Simple Argument,PTEP2024(2024), no. 11 113B02, [arXiv:2405.07669]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Jacobson,Gauging C on the lattice,JHEP05(2025) 138 [2406.12075]

T. Jacobson,Gauging C on the lattice,JHEP05(2025) 138, [arXiv:2406.12075]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Honda, S

Y. Honda, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki,Axion QED as a Lattice Gauge Theory and Non-Invertible Symmetry,PoSLATTICE2024(2025) 358, [arXiv:2412.08142]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,2601.01587

E. Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,arXiv:2601.01587

work page arXiv
[49]

Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,

A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao,Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:2409.12220]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions

L. Gioia and R. Thorngren,Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026), no. 6 061601, [arXiv:2503.07708]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[51]

Xu,”Symmetry-from-Anomaly” in Condensed Matter related Constructions, arXiv:2506.09127

C. Xu,”Symmetry-from-Anomaly” in Condensed Matter related Constructions, arXiv:2506.09127

work page arXiv
[52]

Gioia, A

L. Gioia, A. A. Burkov, and T. L. Hughes,No-go theorem for single time-reversal invariant symmetry-protected Dirac fermions in 3+1d,arXiv:2508.19329

work page arXiv
[53]

DeMarco and X.-G

M. DeMarco and X.-G. Wen,A Commuting Projector Model with a Non-zero Quantized Hall conductance,arXiv:2102.13057

work page arXiv
[54]

M. A. DeMarco, E. Lake, and X.-G. Wen,Topological Mott Insulators and DiscontinuousU(1)θ-Terms,arXiv:2112.00742

work page arXiv
[55]

Ogata,2D Fermionic SPT with CRT symmetry,Journal of Mathematical Physics 64(Sept., 2023) 091901, [arXiv:2212.09038]

Y. Ogata,2D Fermionic SPT with CRT symmetry,Journal of Mathematical Physics 64(Sept., 2023) 091901, [arXiv:2212.09038]

work page arXiv 2023
[56]

Kobayashi, Y

R. Kobayashi, Y. Zhang, Y.-Q. Wang, and M. Barkeshli,(2+1)-dimensional topological phases with RT symmetry: Many-body invariant, classification, and 57 higher-order edge modes,Phys. Rev. B112(2025), no. 23 235111, [arXiv:2403.18887]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Y.-Y. Li, J. Wang, and Y.-Z. You,Quantum Many-Body Lattice C-R-T Symmetry: Fractionalization, Anomaly, and Symmetric Mass Generation,arXiv:2412.19691

work page arXiv
[58]

Sopenko,Reflection positivity and a refined index for 2d invertible phases, arXiv:2509.01711

N. Sopenko,Reflection positivity and a refined index for 2d invertible phases, arXiv:2509.01711

work page arXiv
[59]

Seiberg, S.-H

N. Seiberg, S.-H. Shao, and W. Zhang,LSM and CPT,JHEP11(2025) 116, [arXiv:2508.17115]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions

N. Seiberg and W. Zhang,Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions,arXiv:2601.01191

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[61]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 2 027, [arXiv:2003.10466]

work page arXiv 2021
[62]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,ExoticU(1)Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 3+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,SciPost Phys.9(2020), no. 4 046, [arXiv:2004.00015]

work page arXiv 2020
[63]

Seiberg and S.-H

N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,ExoticZ N symmetries, duality, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field theory,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 1 003, [arXiv:2004.06115]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

Gorantla, H.T

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao,More Exotic Field Theories in 3+1 Dimensions,SciPost Phys.9(2020) 073, [arXiv:2007.04904]

work page arXiv 2020
[65]

Gorantla, H.T

P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao,Low-energy limit of some exotic lattice theories and UV/IR mixing,Phys. Rev. B104(2021), no. 23 235116, [arXiv:2108.00020]

work page arXiv 2021
[66]

Closset, T

C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg,Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories,JHEP10(2012) 053, [arXiv:1205.4142]

work page arXiv 2012
[67]

Closset, T

C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, Comments on Chern-Simons Contact Terms in Three Dimensions,JHEP09(2012) 091, [arXiv:1206.5218]

work page arXiv 2012
[68]

Barkeshli, P

M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang,Symmetry Fractionalization, Defects, and Gauging of Topological Phases,Phys. Rev. B100(2019), no. 11 115147, [arXiv:1410.4540]

work page arXiv 2019
[69]

Frishman, A

Y. Frishman, A. Schwimmer, T. Banks, and S. Yankielowicz,The Axial Anomaly and the Bound State Spectrum in Confining Theories,Nucl. Phys. B177(1981) 157–171. 58

1981
[70]

S. R. Coleman and B. Grossman,’t Hooft’s Consistency Condition as a Consequence of Analyticity and Unitarity,Nucl. Phys. B203(1982) 205–220

1982
[71]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 12 125017, [arXiv:2303.06160]

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Chen,Abelian Topological Order on Lattice Enriched with Electromagnetic Background, Commun

J.-Y. Chen,Abelian Topological Order on Lattice Enriched with Electromagnetic Background,Commun. Math. Phys.381(2021), no. 1 293–377, [arXiv:1902.06756]

work page arXiv 2021
[73]

DeMarco and X.-G

M. DeMarco and X.-G. Wen,CompactU k(1)Chern-Simons Theory as a Local Bosonic Lattice Model with Exact Discrete 1-Symmetries,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021), no. 2 021603, [arXiv:1906.08270]

work page arXiv 2021
[74]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Solvable lattice Hamiltonians with fractional Hall conductivity,Phys. Rev. B105(2022), no. 15 155130, [arXiv:2107.02817]

work page arXiv 2022
[75]

Han and J.-Y

Z. Han and J.-Y. Chen,Fractional Hall conductivity and spin-c structure in solvable lattice Hamiltonians,JHEP02(2023) 130, [arXiv:2208.13785]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Jacobson and T

T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Canonical quantization of lattice Chern-Simons theory,JHEP11(2024) 087, [arXiv:2401.09597]

work page arXiv 2024
[77]

Xu and J.-Y

Z.-A. Xu and J.-Y. Chen,Lattice Chern-Simons-Maxwell theory and its chirality, JHEP08(2025) 062, [arXiv:2410.11034]

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology,arXiv:2601.15939

Y. Ikeda,A Lattice U(1) Chern-Simons Theory via Lattice Deligne-Beilinson Cohomology,arXiv:2601.15939

work page arXiv
[79]

Xu and J.-Y

Z.-A. Xu and J.-Y. Chen,Framing Anomaly in Lattice Chern-Simons-Maxwell Theory,arXiv:2601.04318

work page arXiv
[80]

Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383 [hep-th/9505186]

E. Witten,OnS-duality in Abelian gauge theory,Selecta Math.1(1995) 383, [hep-th/9505186]

work page arXiv 1995

Showing first 80 references.