arxiv: 2604.07162 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Recognition: unknown

Cut Finite Element Methods for Convection-Diffusion in Mixed-Dimensional Domains

Erik Burman , Peter Hansbo , Mats G. Larson , Karl Larsson , Shantiram Mahata

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA

keywords cut finite element methodmixed-dimensional domainsconvection-diffusiona priori error estimatesfractured porous mediafinite element methods

0 comments

The pith

Cut finite element methods using a fixed background mesh converge for convection-diffusion problems posed on mixed-dimensional domains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical method for convection-diffusion equations on domains formed by manifolds of different dimensions linked hierarchically, such as networks of fractures in a porous medium. It replaces geometry-conforming meshes with a single background grid whose active parts represent each manifold component. Weak enforcement of interface conditions plus stabilization terms allow the scheme to handle the coupling between dimensions. A priori estimates are derived for the error in energy and L2 norms, with convergence proven even when the solution belongs only to H^s for 1 < s ≤ 2. This removes the need to construct meshes that exactly fit every intersection, which is often impractical for such geometries.

Core claim

The proposed CutFEM employs continuous piecewise linear elements on active meshes associated with each manifold component of the mixed-dimensional domain. Using a fixed background mesh that does not conform to the geometry, weak enforcement of the coupling conditions at interfaces, and appropriate stabilization terms, the method yields a priori error estimates in the energy norm and the L2 norm. Convergence is established for solutions belonging to the Sobolev space H^s where 1 < s ≤ 2.

What carries the argument

The mixed-dimensional directional derivative and divergence operators that allow the convection-diffusion problem to be written in a form analogous to the standard equation on a single domain, combined with active-mesh representations on a fixed background mesh.

If this is right

The numerical solution approximates the true solution with an error bounded by a constant times the mesh size to the power s in the energy norm when the solution has regularity s.
Corresponding error estimates hold in the L2 norm as a direct consequence of the energy-norm analysis.
The method remains convergent under mesh refinement for convection-diffusion problems whose domains contain intersecting lower-dimensional features.
Numerical experiments on model problems reproduce the theoretical convergence rates in both norms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The single-background-mesh approach may reduce the implementation effort required when many intersecting lower-dimensional structures are present.
The same abstract operator setting and stabilization strategy could be reused for other linear or nonlinear equations posed on the same class of domains.
The weak-coupling formulation opens a route to coupling the present convection-diffusion model with different physics on the various manifold components without changing the underlying mesh.

Load-bearing premise

The mixed-dimensional domain must be representable as a hierarchical union of manifolds where lower-dimensional components form parts of the boundaries of higher-dimensional ones, and the problem must admit a compact abstract formulation using the mixed-dimensional directional derivative and divergence operators.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample would be a specific mixed-dimensional geometry with an exact solution of regularity s = 1.5 for which the computed energy-norm error on a sequence of uniformly refined background meshes fails to decrease at the rate predicted by the theory as the mesh size tends to zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07162 by Erik Burman, Karl Larsson, Mats G. Larson, Peter Hansbo, Shantiram Mahata.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustration of a mixed-dimensional domain O in three dimensions (n = 3) consisting of n3 = 8 cubes, n2 = 12 squares, n1 = 6 lines, and n0 = 1 point. O (a) Mixed-dimensional domain Ω2,1 Ω2,2 Ω1,1 Ω Ω1,2 1,3 Ω0,1 Ω2,3 (b) Partition notation (c) Tangential (red) and normal (blue) vector fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Illustration of a mixed-dimensional domain. (a) A domain O where n = 2, n0 = 1, n1 = 3, and n2 = 3. (b) Notation for the partition of O. (c) Tangential vector fields (red) and exterior unit normal fields (blue). such that each Ωd,i is a smooth d-dimensional manifold with boundary ∂Ωd,i. The partition satisfies ∂Ωd,i ⊂ ∂Ω ∪ d [−1 l=0 Ωl i = 1, . . . , nd, d = 0, . . . , n (2.3) We define the boundary sets … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Example of active meshes for a mixed-dimensional geometry in 2D consisting of three bulk domains (d = 2), three cracks (d = 1), and one bifurcation point (d = 0). The colored parts are the active meshes {Th,d,i}. the resulting linear system. Since the stabilization is not consistent, it is scaled so that the optimal order of convergence is preserved. For linear elements this introduces an artificial tangen… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Case I: Convection-diffusion in bulk and fracture. (a) In this set-up: bulk diffusion coefficients α2,1 = α2,2 = ϵI2×2 and fracture diffusion coefficient α1,1 = ϵ, where ϵ = 10−5 ; bulk vector fields β2,1 = [1, 0], β2,2 = [−1, 0]; fracture vector fields β1,1 = [0, 1]. (b) Exact solution. (c) Numerical solution with h = 0.2. reaction coefficients κd,i, the manufactured exponential solutions are given by u2,… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Case III: Pure convection in bulk and fractures. (a) In this setup: bulk vector fields β2,i are [1, 1], [−1, −1], [−1, −1], [−1, 1]; fracture vector fields β1,i are [0, 1], [−1, 0], [0, 1], [1, 0]. (b) Exact solution. (c) Numerical solution when h = 0.2. exact solutions are the same as in (5.1). The numerical findings reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Low regularity example. (a) In this set-up: bulk diffusion coefficients α2,i = ϵI2×2 with ϵ = 10−5 ; fracture diffusion coefficient α1,i = 0; bulk vector fields β2,i are [1, 0], [0, −1], [−1, 0], [0, 1]; fracture vector fields β1,i are [0, 1], [−1, 0], [0, 1], [1, 0]. (b) Exact solution. (c) Numerical solution when h = 0.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Set-ups for numerical illustrations. (a) The bulk domains feature a constant diagonal convection field β2,1 = β2,2 = [1, 1], while the remaining coefficients are varied in the illustration. (b) In the bulk domains we have no diffusion (ϵ = 0) and constant vector fields β2,i = [0, 1]. In the fractures we have diffusion parameter ϵ = 10−3 , vary the in-flow fracture vector field β1,1, and the remaining vecto… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Illustration 1: Transport across a single fracture. Examples of convection-diffusion on a simple mixed-dimensional domain consisting of two bulk domains and one fracture. The bulk domains feature a diagonal convection field β2,1 = β2,2 = [1, 1] and diffusion α2,i = ϵ2I2×2. The fracture domain features a convection field β1,1 and diffusion α1,1 = ϵ1. Parameters values for fracture convection (β1,1) and dif… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Illustration 2: Transport across a curved fracture network. Numerical solutions for the geometry shown in Figure 7b, consisting of several fractures, including curved branches, together with bifurcation points and bulk flow crossing the fractures in the vertical direction. In the bulk domains we take α2,i = 0 and β2,i = [0, 1], while in the fractures we take diffusion coefficient α1,i = 10−3 . The fractur… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a cut finite element method (CutFEM) for convection-diffusion problems posed on mixed-dimensional domains, i.e., unions of manifolds of different dimensions arranged in a hierarchical structure where lower-dimensional components form parts of the boundaries of higher-dimensional ones. Such domains arise, for instance, in the modeling of fractured porous media with intersecting fractures. The model problem is formulated in a compact abstract form using mixed-dimensional directional derivative and divergence operators, which allows the problem to be expressed in a way that closely resembles the classical convection-diffusion equation. The proposed CutFEM is based on a fixed background mesh that does not conform to the geometry, with each manifold component represented through its associated active mesh. The method employs continuous piecewise linear elements together with weak enforcement of coupling conditions and suitable stabilization. We prove a priori error estimates in energy and $L^2$ norms and establish convergence, also for solutions with reduced regularity $u \in H^s$, $1 < s \le 2$. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical convergence rates and illustrate the performance of the method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper extends CutFEM to mixed-dimensional convection-diffusion with a priori estimates that hold for solutions in H^s, 1 < s ≤ 2.

read the letter

The main point is a CutFEM for convection-diffusion on hierarchical mixed-dimensional domains, like fractures in porous media, together with error estimates that work even for solutions with limited smoothness. They set up the problem in abstract form using mixed-dimensional directional derivatives and divergences so the equation looks like the standard convection-diffusion case on the union of manifolds. The discretization runs on a background mesh with active elements for each component, continuous linears, weak Nitsche coupling between dimensions, and standard stabilization. They prove energy-norm and L2 estimates and get convergence for the reduced-regularity case. The numerics match the predicted rates and show the method on example domains. What they do well is keep the analysis compact through the abstract operators and deliver a practical tool for geometries that arise in geoscience. The reduced-regularity result is useful because real solutions often lose smoothness at intersections. The work is mostly a direct extension of existing CutFEM techniques rather than a new foundational idea, but the combination and the low-regularity analysis are cleanly executed. Soft spots are minor. The proofs rest on the abstract formulation and the usual assumptions about how the manifolds intersect; nothing in the outline suggests hidden inconsistencies, but implementers will still need to tune stabilization parameters when the cuts are complicated. The geometric handling via active meshes follows the standard pattern and does not appear to introduce new difficulties. This paper is for numerical analysts working on unfitted methods or on flow in fractured media. Readers already familiar with CutFEM will see exactly how the pieces adapt and can decide if the rates and implementation details fit their needs. It has enough concrete theory and supporting experiments to deserve a serious referee. I would send it out for peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a cut finite element method (CutFEM) for convection-diffusion problems on mixed-dimensional domains, formulated as hierarchical unions of manifolds of differing dimensions. The problem is recast in compact abstract form via mixed-dimensional directional derivative and divergence operators. The discretization employs a fixed background mesh with active meshes for each manifold component, continuous piecewise linear elements, weak enforcement of coupling conditions, and stabilization. A priori error estimates are proven in energy and L² norms, including convergence for solutions with reduced regularity u ∈ H^s (1 < s ≤ 2), and numerical experiments confirm the rates.

Significance. If the stated error estimates hold, the work supplies a theoretically supported CutFEM extension to mixed-dimensional convection-diffusion problems arising in fractured porous media. The abstract operator formulation permits direct application of standard Galerkin-plus-stabilization analysis, while the reduced-regularity bounds and accompanying numerical validation constitute a concrete advance for non-standard domain discretizations.

minor comments (3)

[Method section] The description of the stabilization terms (ghost-penalty and Nitsche-type) would benefit from an explicit statement of the parameter scaling with mesh size and diffusion coefficient to aid reproducibility.
[Numerical experiments] In the numerical experiments, the figures showing convergence rates would be clearer if the observed orders were annotated directly on the plots or in the captions.
[Section 3] A short remark clarifying how the active-mesh construction handles intersections between manifolds of different dimensions would improve geometric clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The summary accurately captures the main contributions of the work, including the abstract operator formulation, the CutFEM discretization on hierarchical mixed-dimensional domains, the a priori error estimates for solutions with reduced regularity, and the supporting numerical experiments. Since the report does not list any specific major comments, we interpret the recommendation as an invitation to prepare a revised version incorporating any minor editorial or typographical suggestions that may arise during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper formulates the mixed-dimensional convection-diffusion problem using abstract directional derivative and divergence operators on a hierarchical manifold union, then discretizes via standard CutFEM on a background mesh with active meshes per component, continuous P1 elements, weak coupling via Nitsche terms, and ghost-penalty stabilization. The a priori energy and L2 error estimates, including rates for u in H^s (1<s≤2), follow from classical Galerkin orthogonality plus consistency and stability bounds on the stabilization terms; these steps invoke only the problem's weak form, standard trace inequalities, and interpolation theory without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional reductions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the argument to its inputs. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from finite element theory for mixed-dimensional problems and the abstract operator formulation; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Mixed-dimensional domains are unions of manifolds of different dimensions arranged hierarchically, with lower-dimensional components forming parts of higher-dimensional boundaries.
Explicitly stated as the setting for the model problem in the abstract.
domain assumption The convection-diffusion problem admits a compact abstract formulation using mixed-dimensional directional derivative and divergence operators that resembles the classical equation.
Described as the way the model problem is posed to enable the method development.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1392 out tokens · 58093 ms · 2026-05-10T17:02:15.405723+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Alboin, J

C. Alboin, J. Jaffr´ e, J. E. Roberts, and C. Serres. Modeling fractures as interfaces for flow and transport in porous media. InFluid flow and transport in porous media: mathematical and numerical treatment (South Hadley, MA, 2001), volume 295 ofContemp. Math., pages 13–24. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002. doi:10.1090/conm/295/04999

work page doi:10.1090/conm/295/04999 2001
[3]

Angot, F

P. Angot, F. Boyer, and F. Hubert. Asymptotic and numerical modelling of flows in fractured porous media.M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 43(2):239–275, 2009. doi:10.1051/m2an/2008052

work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2008052 2009
[4]

P. F. Antonietti, C. Facciol` a, A. Russo, and M. Verani. Discontinuous Galerkin approximation of flows in fractured porous media on polytopic grids.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 41(1):A109–A138, 2019. doi:10.1137/17M1138194

work page doi:10.1137/17m1138194 2019
[5]

Bendali and K

A. Bendali and K. Lemrabet. The effect of a thin coating on the scattering of a time- harmonic wave for the Helmholtz equation.SIAM J. Appl. Math., 56(6):1664–1693, 1996. doi:10.1137/S0036139995281822

work page doi:10.1137/s0036139995281822 1996
[6]

Berrone, S

S. Berrone, S. Pieraccini, and S. Scial` o. A PDE-constrained optimization formulation for discrete fracture network flows.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 35(2):B487–B510, 2013. doi:10.1137/120865884

work page doi:10.1137/120865884 2013
[7]

W. M. Boon, J. M. Nordbotten, and J. E. Vatne. Functional analysis and exterior calculus on mixed- dimensional geometries.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 200(2):757–789, 2021. doi:10.1007/s10231-020- 01013-1

work page doi:10.1007/s10231-020- 2021
[8]

W. M. Boon, J. M. Nordbotten, and I. Yotov. Robust discretization of flow in fractured porous media.SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 56(4):2203–2233, 2018. doi:10.1137/17M1139102

work page doi:10.1137/17m1139102 2018
[9]

Burman, S

E. Burman, S. Claus, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and A. Massing. CutFEM: discretizing geome- try and partial differential equations.Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 104(7):472–501, 2015. doi:10.1002/nme.4823

work page doi:10.1002/nme.4823 2015
[10]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, and M. G. Larson. A stabilized cut finite element method for partial differential equations on surfaces: the Laplace-Beltrami operator.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 285:188–207, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.044

work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.044 2015
[11]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, and M. G. Larson. A cut finite element method for a model of pressure in fractured media.Numer. Math., 146(4):783–818, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00211-020-01157-5

work page doi:10.1007/s00211-020-01157-5 2020
[12]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, and M. G. Larson. Low regularity estimates for CutFEM approxima- tions of an elliptic problem with mixed boundary conditions.Math. Comp., 93(345):35–54, 2024. doi:10.1090/mcom/3875

work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3875 2024
[13]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and K. Larsson. Cut finite elements for convection in fractured domains.Comput. & Fluids, 179:726–734, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.022

work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.022 2019
[14]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, K. Larsson, and A. Massing. Finite element approximation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on a surface with boundary.Numer. Math., 141(1):141–172, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00211-018-0990-2

work page doi:10.1007/s00211-018-0990-2 2019
[15]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and A. Massing. A cut discontinuous Galerkin method for the Laplace-Beltrami operator.IMA J. Numer. Anal., 37(1):138–169, 2017. doi:10.1093/imanum/drv068

work page doi:10.1093/imanum/drv068 2017
[16]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and A. Massing. Cut finite element methods for partial differential equations on embedded manifolds of arbitrary codimensions.ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 52(6):2247–2282, 2018. doi:10.1051/m2an/2018038

work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2018038 2018
[17]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, A. Massing, and S. Zahedi. Full gradient stabilized cut finite element methods for surface partial differential equations.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 310:278–296, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.06.033

work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.06.033 2016
[18]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, A. Massing, and S. Zahedi. A stabilized cut streamline diffusion finite element method for convection-diffusion problems on surfaces.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 358:112645, 19, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112645

work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112645 2020
[19]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and S. Zahedi. Cut finite element methods for coupled bulk-surface problems.Numer. Math., 133(2):203–231, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00211-015-0744-3

work page doi:10.1007/s00211-015-0744-3 2016
[20]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and S. Zahedi. Stabilized CutFEM for the convection problem on surfaces.Numer. Math., 141(1):103–139, 2019. doi:10.1007/s00211-018-0989-8

work page doi:10.1007/s00211-018-0989-8 2019
[21]

Burman, P

E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and S. Zahedi. Cut finite element methods.Acta Numer., 34:1–121, 2025. doi:10.1017/S0962492925000017. 33

work page doi:10.1017/s0962492925000017 2025
[22]

Cioranescu and P

D. Cioranescu and P. Donato.An Introduction to Homogenization. Oxford University Press, 11
[23]

doi:10.1093/oso/9780198565543.001.0001

work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198565543.001.0001
[24]

D’Angelo

C. D’Angelo. Finite element approximation of elliptic problems with Dirac measure terms in weighted spaces: applications to one- and three-dimensional coupled problems.SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50(1):194–215, 2012. doi:10.1137/100813853

work page doi:10.1137/100813853 2012
[25]

D’Angelo and A

C. D’Angelo and A. Quarteroni. On the coupling of 1D and 3D diffusion-reaction equations. Ap- plication to tissue perfusion problems.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18(8):1481–1504, 2008. doi:10.1142/S0218202508003108

work page doi:10.1142/s0218202508003108 2008
[26]

Ern and J.-L

A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond.Finite elements I—Approximation and interpolation, volume 72 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, Cham, [2021]©2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56341-7

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56341-7 2021
[27]

Formaggia, A

L. Formaggia, A. Quarteroni, and A. Veneziani.Cardiovascular Mathematics: Modeling and Sim- ulation of the Circulatory System, volume 1 ofMS&A. Springer Science & Business Media, Milan,
[28]

doi:10.1007/978-88-470-1152-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-88-470-1152-6
[29]

Fumagalli and E

A. Fumagalli and E. Keilegavlen. Dual Virtual Element Methods for Discrete Fracture Matrix models.Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, 74(41):1–17, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2019008

work page doi:10.2516/ogst/2019008 2019
[30]

Grande, C

J. Grande, C. Lehrenfeld, and A. Reusken. Analysis of a high-order trace finite element method for PDEs on level set surfaces.SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 56(1):228–255, 2018. doi:10.1137/16M1102203

work page doi:10.1137/16m1102203 2018
[31]

Gross, M

S. Gross, M. A. Olshanskii, and A. Reusken. A trace finite element method for a class of coupled bulk-interface transport problems.ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 49(5):1303–1330, 2015. doi:10.1051/m2an/2015013

work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2015013 2015
[32]

Hellman, A

F. Hellman, A. M˚ alqvist, and M. Mosquera. Well-posedness and finite element approxima- tion of mixed dimensional partial differential equations.BIT, 64(1):Paper No. 2, 22, 2024. doi:10.1007/s10543-023-01001-w

work page doi:10.1007/s10543-023-01001-w 2024
[33]

V. John, P. Knobloch, and J. Novo. Finite elements for scalar convection-dominated equations and incompressible flow problems: a never ending story?Comput. Vis. Sci., 19(5-6):47–63, 2018. doi:10.1007/s00791-018-0290-5

work page doi:10.1007/s00791-018-0290-5 2018
[34]

Jonsson, M

T. Jonsson, M. G. Larson, and K. Larsson. Cut finite element methods for elliptic problems on multipatch parametric surfaces.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 324:366–394, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2017.06.018

work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2017.06.018 2017
[35]

K¨ oppl and B

T. K¨ oppl and B. Wohlmuth. Optimal a priori error estimates for an elliptic problem with Dirac right-hand side.SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52(4):1753–1769, 2014. doi:10.1137/130927619

work page doi:10.1137/130927619 2014
[36]

M. G. Larson and S. Zahedi. Stabilization of high order cut finite element methods on surfaces. IMA J. Numer. Anal., 40(3):1702–1745, 2020. doi:10.1093/imanum/drz021

work page doi:10.1093/imanum/drz021 2020
[37]

Martin, J

V. Martin, J. Jaffr´ e, and J. E. Roberts. Modeling fractures and barriers as interfaces for flow in porous media.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26(5):1667–1691, 2005. doi:10.1137/S1064827503429363

work page doi:10.1137/s1064827503429363 2005
[38]

N¨ avert.A finite element method for convection-diffusion problems

U. N¨ avert.A finite element method for convection-diffusion problems. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Computer Sciences, 1982

1982
[39]

J. M. Nordbotten and W. M. Boon. Modeling, structure and discretization of hierarchical mixed- dimensional partial differential equations. InDomain decomposition methods in science and engi- neering XXIV, volume 125 ofLect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng., pages 87–101. Springer, Cham, 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93873-8 7

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93873-8 2018
[40]

M. A. Olshanskii, A. Reusken, and J. Grande. A finite element method for elliptic equations on surfaces.SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 47(5):3339–3358, 2009. doi:10.1137/080717602

work page doi:10.1137/080717602 2009
[41]

M. A. Olshanskii, A. Reusken, and X. Xu. A stabilized finite element method for advection-diffusion equations on surfaces.IMA J. Numer. Anal., 34(2):732–758, 2014. doi:10.1093/imanum/drt016

work page doi:10.1093/imanum/drt016 2014
[42]

A. Reusken. Analysis of trace finite element methods for surface partial differential equations.IMA J. Numer. Anal., 35(4):1568–1590, 2015. doi:10.1093/imanum/dru047. 34 Authors’ addresses: Erik Burman, Mathematics, University College London, UK e.burman@ucl.ac.uk Peter Hansbo, Mechanical Engineering, J¨ onk¨ oping University, Sweden peter.hansbo@ju.se Ma...

work page doi:10.1093/imanum/dru047 2015