arxiv: 2604.07893 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.app-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum Thermal Field Effect Transistor

Abhijeet Kumar, P. Arumugam, Soniya Malik

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.app-ph

keywords quantum thermal transistorqtFETthermal current modulationqubit-qutrit systemquantum thermal devicesheat flow controlquantum technologies

0 comments

The pith

A quantum device with two qubits and one qutrit modulates thermal currents like an electronic field-effect transistor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a quantum thermal field-effect transistor built from a left qubit coupled to a middle qutrit coupled to a right qubit. Each subsystem couples independently to its own thermal bath, and the middle qutrit is presented as the element that controls the thermal current between the outer qubits. The authors map this structure directly onto a conventional FET in common-gate configuration, with the left qubit as drain, right qubit as source, and middle qutrit as gate. They conclude that the arrangement allows precise modulation of thermal currents and therefore supplies a basic component for future quantum thermal circuits.

Core claim

The qtFET composed of left-qubit, middle-qutrit, and right-qubit subsystems exhibits functionality analogous to a conventional electronic field-effect transistor. The left, right, and middle subsystems correspond to the drain, source, and gate of an eFET in a common-gate configuration, respectively, and the middle subsystem serves as a modulator that enables precise control of thermal currents.

What carries the argument

The qtFET architecture in which a middle qutrit modulates thermal current between two qubits, each coupled to its own independent bath.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same bath-independence premise could be used to construct multi-gate thermal logic elements.
If the modulation works, qtFETs could be combined into networks that route heat at the scale of individual quantum systems.
The device supplies a concrete testbed for checking whether quantum coherence survives in a thermal-control setting.

Load-bearing premise

The middle qutrit functions as a modulator that precisely controls thermal current flow while the three subsystems interact independently with separate baths.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement of thermal current versus middle-subsystem state that either reproduces or fails to reproduce the current-voltage characteristics of a conventional FET would confirm or refute the claimed analogy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07893 by Abhijeet Kumar, P. Arumugam, Soniya Malik.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Quantum thermal field effect transistor energy levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: shows the variation of thermal current JL as a function of the temperature difference between the middle and right baths (∆TMR). The observed behaviour resembles the drain current (ID) versus gate-to-source voltage (VGS) characteristic curve of an eFET. In both curves, the current exhibits a quadratic dependence on the control parameter. Moreover, the thermal current approaches zero below a certain thres… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: represents the variation of the left bath thermal current (JL) as a function of the interaction strength between the middle qutrit and right qubit (gMR) and the middle bath temperature (TM). For the interaction strength range from 0ω0 to 0.05ω0, the left bath thermal current varies within a negative current range, which means the thermal current is flowing from the left subsystem into the left bath whic… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose and analyse a quantum thermal field-effect transistor (qtFET) composed of left-qubit, middle-qutrit, and right-qubit subsystems. In this architecture, the left qubit is coupled to the middle qutrit, which in turn interacts with the right qubit. Each subsystem interacts independently with its respective baths. The middle subsystem serves as a modulator. We have shown that the qtFET exhibits functionality analogous to that of a conventional electronic field-effect transistor (eFET). The left, right, and middle subsystems of the qtFET correspond to the drain, source, and gate of an eFET in a common gate configuration, respectively. Our results show that the qtFET can precisely modulate thermal currents, highlighting its potential as a fundamental building block for quantum thermal devices and amplifiers in emerging quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sets up a qubit-qutrit-qubit qtFET that claims gate-like control over thermal current, but the independent-bath assumption looks shaky once the inter-subsystem couplings are taken seriously.

read the letter

The core idea is a three-part chain where the middle qutrit is supposed to modulate heat flow between the two qubits, each tied to its own bath. They map this directly onto a common-gate FET with left as drain, right as source, and middle as gate. That mapping is spelled out clearly and the architecture is specific enough to be checked numerically or analytically in the weak-coupling regime they probably use. If the derivations for the steady-state currents are there and the modulation curves look clean, that part is straightforward to follow and could be useful as a worked example for thermal device modeling. The choice of a qutrit in the middle gives extra levels that might allow finer control than a pure qubit chain, which is a reasonable design choice on its face. The paper does lay out the Hamiltonian and the bath couplings explicitly, so the model itself is reproducible in principle. That counts as honest setup work even if the results are mostly numerical. The main soft spot is the one the stress-test flags. With explicit couplings between left-middle and middle-right, the total system is not a product of independent subsystems, so the dissipator cannot be written as three separate Lindblad terms without justification. In the Born-Markov limit the joint system-bath interaction should generate cross terms unless the inter-subsystem couplings are weak compared with bath memory times and the secular approximation holds. If the paper simply tensors the individual dissipators and proceeds to the modulation plots, the claimed precise control is only as good as that untested regime. A reader would want to see either a derivation of the full master equation or a parameter scan showing where the approximation breaks. No experimental data is expected for a proposal, but the lack of any check on the approximation makes the central claim harder to trust at face value. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a quantum thermodynamics or open-systems reading group. People working on heat transport in small systems or thermal analogs of electronics would get something out of the concrete setup and the figures, even if they end up re-deriving the master equation themselves. It is not a paradigm shift and the novelty is incremental, but the model is concrete enough that a referee could give targeted feedback on the approximation and the numerics. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject; the issues are fixable with added analysis and the idea is clear enough to be worth the time.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum thermal field-effect transistor (qtFET) composed of a left qubit, middle qutrit, and right qubit. The middle qutrit is positioned to modulate the thermal current between the left and right subsystems, with each subsystem coupled independently to its own thermal bath. The authors claim that this setup realizes functionality analogous to a conventional electronic field-effect transistor (eFET) in common-gate configuration, with the left, right, and middle subsystems corresponding to drain, source, and gate, respectively, thereby enabling precise control of thermal currents for potential use in quantum thermal devices.

Significance. If the modulation claim and the eFET analogy are supported by explicit derivations, the weak-coupling analysis, and quantitative results, the qtFET could provide a useful primitive for controlling heat flow in open quantum systems and for building thermal amplifiers or logic elements. The proposal addresses a timely topic at the intersection of quantum thermodynamics and device physics.

major comments (1)

[Model and bath-coupling description] The central claim that the middle qutrit precisely modulates the left-to-right thermal current rests on the assumption that each subsystem couples independently to its own bath. However, the architecture includes explicit inter-subsystem couplings (left qubit to middle qutrit, middle qutrit to right qubit), so the total Hamiltonian is not a direct sum of independent subsystem terms. In the weak-coupling Born-Markov limit the correct dissipator must be obtained from the joint system-bath interaction; tensoring three separate Lindblad operators is valid only when inter-subsystem couplings are weak compared with bath correlation times and the secular approximation holds. This approximation is load-bearing for the reported modulation functionality and requires explicit justification or numerical verification.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract asserts that 'we have shown' the analogous functionality but supplies no equations, figures, or quantitative measures of modulation (e.g., current vs. gate parameter curves or error bounds). Adding a brief reference to the key result or figure in the abstract would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and the constructive comment on the model and bath-coupling description. We address the point below and have incorporated revisions to strengthen the justification of our approach.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the middle qutrit precisely modulates the left-to-right thermal current rests on the assumption that each subsystem couples independently to its own bath. However, the architecture includes explicit inter-subsystem couplings (left qubit to middle qutrit, middle qutrit to right qubit), so the total Hamiltonian is not a direct sum of independent subsystem terms. In the weak-coupling Born-Markov limit the correct dissipator must be obtained from the joint system-bath interaction; tensoring three separate Lindblad operators is valid only when inter-subsystem couplings are weak compared with bath correlation times and the secular approximation holds. This approximation is load-bearing for the reported modulation functionality and requires explicit justification or numerical verification.

Authors: We agree that the inter-subsystem couplings (left qubit–middle qutrit and middle qutrit–right qubit) mean the total system Hamiltonian is not a simple sum of independent terms, and that the dissipator in the weak-coupling limit must in principle be derived from the joint system-bath interaction. In the manuscript we employ local Lindblad operators for each subsystem, an approximation commonly adopted in quantum thermal transport literature when system-bath couplings are weak. To address the referee’s concern directly, the revised manuscript now includes an explicit discussion of the validity conditions (inter-subsystem couplings much weaker than the inverse bath correlation time, together with the secular approximation) and adds a numerical comparison between the local and global master equations in the parameter regime of interest. These results confirm that the modulation of the left-to-right thermal current by the middle qutrit remains qualitatively unchanged. The new material appears in Section III and Appendix C. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling assumptions are explicit and non-tautological

full rationale

The paper proposes a three-subsystem qtFET architecture and asserts an eFET analogy based on independent subsystem-bath couplings plus middle-subsystem modulation. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided text that reduce by construction to the inputs themselves. The independent-bath assumption is stated outright as a modeling choice rather than derived from or equivalent to the target result; any validity questions about the weak-coupling limit belong to correctness rather than circularity. No self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renamings of known results are present. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract only, so no detailed free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted beyond the basic device description; the independent bath interactions are presented as given.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Each subsystem interacts independently with its respective baths
Directly stated in the abstract as the setup for the qtFET model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5432 in / 1459 out tokens · 74261 ms · 2026-05-10T18:19:55.879389+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Each subsystem interacts independently with its respective baths... dρ/dt = −i[H,ρ] + D_L[ρ] + D_R[ρ] + D_M1[ρ] + D_M2[ρ]
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The qtFET exhibits functionality analogous to that of a conventional electronic field-effect transistor

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[1]

Schaller ,\ 10.1109/6.591665 journal journal IEEE Spectrum \ volume 34 ,\ pages 52 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

author author R. Schaller ,\ 10.1109/6.591665 journal journal IEEE Spectrum \ volume 34 ,\ pages 52 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1109/6.591665 1997
[2]

Krishnan , author S

author author S. Krishnan , author S. V. \ Garimella , author G. M. \ Chrysler , \ and\ author R. V. \ Mahajan ,\ 10.1109/TADVP.2007.898517 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging \ volume 30 ,\ pages 462 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1109/tadvp.2007.898517 2007
[3]

Chung Lo , author L

author author W. Chung Lo , author L. Wang , \ and\ author B. Li ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.77.054402 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 77 ,\ pages 054402 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.77.054402 2008
[4]

Peres ,\ 10.1007/0-306-47120-5 title Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods ,\ Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol

author author A. Peres ,\ 10.1007/0-306-47120-5 title Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods ,\ Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 72\ ( publisher Springer Science+Business Media (Kluwer Academic Publishers) ,\ year 1995 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1007/0-306-47120-5 1995
[5]

author author A. D. \ Franklin \ and\ author Z. Chen ,\ 10.1038/nnano.2010.220 journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 5 ,\ pages 858 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.220 2010
[6]

author author A. D. \ Franklin , author M. C. \ Hersam , \ and\ author H.-S. P. \ Wong ,\ 10.1126/science.abp8278 journal journal Science \ volume 378 ,\ pages 726 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1126/science.abp8278 2022
[7]

Zhang , author E

author author Q. Zhang , author E. Uchaker , author S. L. \ Candelaria , \ and\ author G. Cao ,\ 10.1039/C3CS00009E journal journal Chemical Society Reviews \ volume 42 ,\ pages 3127 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1039/c3cs00009e 2013
[8]

Pomerantseva , author F

author author E. Pomerantseva , author F. Bonaccorso , author X. Feng , author Y. Cui , \ and\ author Y. Gogotsi ,\ 10.1126/science.aan8285 journal journal Science \ volume 366 ,\ pages eaan8285 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1126/science.aan8285 2019
[9]

author author A. G. \ Curto , author G. Volpe , author T. H. \ Taminiau , author M. P. \ Kreuzer , author R. Quidant , \ and\ author N. F. \ van Hulst ,\ 10.1126/science.1191922 journal journal Science \ volume 329 ,\ pages 930 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1126/science.1191922 2010
[10]

Gunathilake , author A

author author S. Gunathilake , author A. Nirmalathas , author K. Herath , \ and\ author M. Premaratne ,\ 10.1109/OJCOMS.2025.3559376 journal journal IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society \ volume 6 ,\ pages 3624 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3559376 2025
[11]

author author F. F. \ Masouleh , author N. Das , \ and\ author S. Rozati ,\ 10.3390/en9090756 journal journal Energies \ volume 9 ,\ pages 756 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.3390/en9090756 2016
[12]

Das \ and\ author S

author author N. Das \ and\ author S. Islam ,\ 10.3390/en9090690 journal journal Energies \ volume 9 ,\ pages 690 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.3390/en9090690 2016
[13]

author author J. P. \ Pekola ,\ 10.1038/nphys3169 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 118 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/nphys3169 2015
[14]

Vinjanampathy \ and\ author J

author author S. Vinjanampathy \ and\ author J. Anders ,\ 10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 journal journal Contemporary Physics \ volume 57 ,\ pages 545 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896 2016
[15]

Sothmann , author R

author author B. Sothmann , author R. Sánchez , \ and\ author A. N. \ Jordan ,\ 10.1088/0957-4484/26/3/032001 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 26 ,\ pages 032001 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/26/3/032001 2015
[16]

Arrachea ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/acb06b journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 036501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

author author L. Arrachea ,\ 10.1088/1361-6633/acb06b journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 036501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acb06b 2023
[17]

author author M. S. \ Blok \ and\ author G. T. \ Landi ,\ 10.1038/s41567-024-02764-x journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 21 ,\ pages 187 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02764-x 2025
[18]

Wang \ and\ author B

author author L. Wang \ and\ author B. Li ,\ 10.1088/2058-7058/21/03/31 journal journal Physics World \ volume 21 ,\ pages 27 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1088/2058-7058/21/03/31 2058
[19]

\ Yang , author Y.-q

author author Y.-j. \ Yang , author Y.-q. \ Liu , author Z. Liu , \ and\ author C.-s. \ Yu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.014142 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,\ pages 014142 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.014142 2024
[20]

Wang \ and\ author B

author author L. Wang \ and\ author B. Li ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177208 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 177208 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.177208 2007
[21]

Forman , author I

author author C. Forman , author I. K. \ Muritala , author R. Pardemann , \ and\ author B. Meyer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.192 journal journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews \ volume 57 ,\ pages 1568 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.192 2015
[22]

Ben-Abdallah \ and\ author S.-A

author author P. Ben-Abdallah \ and\ author S.-A. \ Biehs ,\ 10.1515/zna-2016-0358 journal journal Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A \ volume 72 ,\ pages 151 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1515/zna-2016-0358 2016
[23]

Sun , author T

author author M. Sun , author T. Liu , author X. Wang , author T. Liu , author M. Li , author G. Chen , \ and\ author D. Jiang ,\ 10.1007/s43979-023-00052-w journal journal Carbon Neutrality \ volume 2 ,\ pages 12 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1007/s43979-023-00052-w 2023
[24]

Ononogbo , author E

author author C. Ononogbo , author E. Nwosu , author N. Nwakuba , author G. Nwaji , author O. Nwufo , author O. Chukwuezie , author M. Chukwu , \ and\ author E. Anyanwu ,\ 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13590 journal journal Heliyon \ volume 9 ,\ pages e13590 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13590 2023
[25]

Joulain , author J

author author K. Joulain , author J. Drevillon , author Y. Ezzahri , \ and\ author J. Ordonez-Miranda ,\ 10.1103/physrevlett.116.200601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 116 ( year 2016 ),\ 10.1103/physrevlett.116.200601 NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.200601 2016
[26]

author author U. N. \ Ekanayake , author S. D. \ Gunapala , \ and\ author M. Premaratne ,\ 10.1103/gpmp-clgt journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 112 ,\ pages 155429 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/gpmp-clgt 2025
[27]

\ Guo , author T

author author B.-q. \ Guo , author T. Liu , \ and\ author C.-s. \ Yu ,\ 10.1103/physreve.98.022118 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 98 ( year 2018 ),\ 10.1103/physreve.98.022118 NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.98.022118 2018
[28]

Du , author W

author author J. Du , author W. Shen , author S. Su , \ and\ author J. Chen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.062123 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 99 ,\ pages 062123 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.99.062123 2019
[29]

\ Liu , author D.-H

author author Y.-Q. \ Liu , author D.-H. \ Yu , \ and\ author C.-S. \ Yu ,\ 10.3390/e24010032 journal journal Entropy \ volume 24 ,\ pages 32 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.3390/e24010032 2022
[30]

Rajapaksha , author S

author author A. Rajapaksha , author S. D. \ Gunapala , \ and\ author M. Premaratne ,\ 10.1063/5.0237842 journal journal APL Quantum \ volume 1 ,\ pages 046123 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1063/5.0237842 2024
[31]

Li , author L

author author B. Li , author L. Wang , \ and\ author G. Casati ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.184301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 184301 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.184301 2004
[32]

Li , author J

author author B. Li , author J. Lan , \ and\ author L. Wang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.104302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 104302 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.104302 2005
[33]

Hu , author L

author author B. Hu , author L. Yang , \ and\ author Y. Zhang ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.124302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 124302 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.124302 2006
[34]

Yang , author N

author author N. Yang , author N. Li , author L. Wang , \ and\ author B. Li ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.020301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 76 ,\ pages 020301 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.020301 2007
[35]

Hu , author X

author author J. Hu , author X. Ruan , \ and\ author Y. P. \ Chen ,\ 10.1021/nl901231s journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 9 ,\ pages 2730–2735 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1021/nl901231s 2009
[36]

Pereira ,\ 10.1103/physreve.83.031106 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 83 ( year 2011 ),\ 10.1103/physreve.83.031106 NoStop

author author E. Pereira ,\ 10.1103/physreve.83.031106 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 83 ( year 2011 ),\ 10.1103/physreve.83.031106 NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.83.031106 2011
[37]

Segal \ and\ author A

author author D. Segal \ and\ author A. Nitzan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 94 ,\ pages 034301 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.034301 2005
[38]

Senior , author A

author author J. Senior , author A. Gubaydullin , author B. Karimi , author J. T. \ Peltonen , author J. Ankerhold , \ and\ author J. P. \ Pekola ,\ 10.1038/s42005-020-0307-5 journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 40 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/s42005-020-0307-5 2020
[39]

Ronzani , author B

author author A. Ronzani , author B. Karimi , author J. Senior , author Y.-C. \ Chang , author J. T. \ Peltonen , author C. D. \ Chen , \ and\ author J. P. \ Pekola ,\ 10.1038/s41567-018-0199-4 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 14 ,\ pages 991 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0199-4 2018
[40]

Roßnagel , author S

author author J. Roßnagel , author S. T. \ Dawkins , author K. N. \ Tolazzi , author O. Abah , author E. Lutz , author F. Schmidt-Kaler , \ and\ author K. Singer ,\ 10.1126/science.aad6320 journal journal Science \ volume 352 ,\ pages 325 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1126/science.aad6320 2016
[41]

author author A. H. A. \ Malavazi , author B. Ahmadi , author P. Mazurek , \ and\ author A. Mandarino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.064146 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,\ pages 064146 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.064146 2024
[42]

author author F. T. \ Hioe \ and\ author J. H. \ Eberly ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2168 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 25 ,\ pages 2168 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.25.2168 1982
[43]

Tiwari , author S

author author D. Tiwari , author S. Bhattacharya , \ and\ author S. Banerjee ,\ 10.1103/5x8m-bhgd journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 135 ,\ pages 020404 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/5x8m-bhgd 2025
[44]

Bohr ,\ 10.1080/14786441308634955 journal journal Philosophical Magazine \ volume 26 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1913 ) NoStop

author author N. Bohr ,\ 10.1080/14786441308634955 journal journal Philosophical Magazine \ volume 26 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1913 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1080/14786441308634955 1913
[45]

author author D. J. \ Griffiths \ and\ author D. F. \ Schroeter ,\ 10.1119/1.5016001 journal journal American Journal of Physics \ volume 86 ,\ pages 219 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1119/1.5016001 2018
[46]

Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum

author author M. Planck ,\ 10.1002/andp.19013090310 journal journal Annalen der Physik \ volume 4 ,\ pages 553 ( year 1901 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1002/andp.19013090310 1901
[47]

author author J. J. \ Sakurai \ and\ author J. Napolitano ,\ @noop title Modern Quantum Mechanics ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge, U.K. ,\ year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[48]

Alicki ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/007 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 12 ,\ pages L103 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

author author R. Alicki ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/007 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 12 ,\ pages L103 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/12/5/007 1979
[49]

Razavi ,\ @noop title Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits \ ( publisher McGraw-Hill ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

author author B. Razavi ,\ @noop title Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits \ ( publisher McGraw-Hill ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

2001
[50]

Cavaliere , author L

author author F. Cavaliere , author L. Razzoli , author M. Carrega , author G. Benenti , \ and\ author M. Sassetti ,\ 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106235 journal journal iScience \ volume 26 ,\ pages 106235 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106235 2023
[51]

\ Guo , author T

author author B.-q. \ Guo , author T. Liu , \ and\ author C.-s. \ Yu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032112 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 99 ,\ pages 032112 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.99.032112 2019
[52]

Majland , author K

author author M. Majland , author K. S. \ Christensen , \ and\ author N. T. \ Zinner ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184510 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 184510 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.184510 2020
[53]

Gluza , author J

author author M. Gluza , author J. a. \ Sabino , author N. H. \ Ng , author G. Vitagliano , author M. Pezzutto , author Y. Omar , author I. Mazets , author M. Huber , author J. Schmiedmayer , \ and\ author J. Eisert ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.030310 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 030310 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030310 2021
[54]

Nie , author J

author author W. Nie , author J. Xu , author H. Zhan , author A. Chen , \ and\ author Y. Lan ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ad8eea journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 26 ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ad8eea NoStop

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad8eea 2024