pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08055 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dissipating the correlation smokescreen: Causal decomposition of the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols over the South-East Atlantic

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords biomass burning aerosolsSouth-East Atlanticcausal inferenceradiative effectsaerosol-radiation interactionsaerosol-cloud interactionsstratocumulusshortwave radiation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Biomass burning aerosols over the South-East Atlantic cause a shortwave cooling of -2.5 W m^{-2} during the fire season, equally split among three pathways.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a causal inference method using graphs on satellite data to separate the true effects of biomass burning aerosols from confounding weather factors. It shows that the aerosols cool the region by 2.5 watts per square meter in shortwave radiation. This cooling breaks down into three equal parts from direct aerosol-radiation interactions, adjustments following those interactions, and aerosol-cloud interactions. The method reveals how simple correlations can mislead by 15 to 50 percent due to confounding factors like winds and humidity biases in data. This separation provides clearer observational targets for climate models to match when simulating smoke impacts.

Core claim

During the fire season, biomass burning aerosols cause a regional shortwave cooling of -2.5 W m^{-2}, which can be decomposed into equal contributions from three physical pathways: aerosol-radiation interactions (ARI), adjustments to ARI, and aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). This decomposition is obtained by using a physically informed statistical approach based on causal graphs applied to satellite observations, which disentangles the BBA influences while identifying sources of bias in correlative studies.

What carries the argument

Causal graphs applied to satellite observations, which structure the variables to block confounding paths from meteorology and retrieval biases, thereby isolating the causal radiative effects of the aerosols.

If this is right

  • The radiative cooling effect is attributed in equal measure to direct aerosol-radiation interactions, adjustments to those interactions, and aerosol-cloud interactions.
  • Observational studies that rely on correlations without causal adjustments can produce biased estimates of the radiative effects ranging from -50% to +15%.
  • The resulting causal estimates serve as observational constraints to reduce uncertainties in climate model representations of biomass burning aerosol effects.
  • Graph ablation experiments identify large-scale winds, humidity-biased retrievals, and spatial data aggregation as primary sources of confounding bias.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The causal approach could be extended to other regions with aerosol-cloud interactions to provide more reliable observational benchmarks for models.
  • If the equal contribution of the three pathways holds in other seasons or locations, models would need to balance improvements across all pathways rather than emphasizing one.
  • Additional satellite or in-situ data on humidity profiles could further test and refine the causal graph structure to address potential remaining biases.

Load-bearing premise

The causal graph includes all relevant physical relationships and successfully blocks or corrects for confounding factors such as meteorological influences and satellite retrieval biases.

What would settle it

Independent high-resolution model simulations or targeted field measurements where the true causal effects of the aerosols are known, allowing direct comparison to the estimated -2.5 W m^{-2} cooling and its decomposition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08055 by David Neubauer, Emilie Fons, Isabel L. McCoy, Tom Beucler, Ulrike Lohmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic causal pathways for the shortwave radiative effects of BBAs. The direct, indirect and semi-direct pathways are shown in green, purple and blue, respectively. In grey, dotted arrows show how confounding meteorological influences can bias the statistical estimate of BBA radiative effects. climate models (e.g. AeroCom II models) suffer from uncertainties related to fire emission modeling and paramet… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Summary of the method, decomposed in 4 steps, from (1.) assumption of the reference causal graph to (4.) computation of biases in radiative effect estimates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the computed values of every causal arrow featured in the reference causal graph (Step 2 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: BBA radiative effect per pathway: (a) direct, (b) indirect, (c) semi-direct and (d) resulting total (note the different colorscale). The region-average BBA shortwave radiative effect is displayed in the upper left corner. Stippling indicates where the bootstrap confidence intervals include 0. 3.3. Sources of confounding In Step 4 of the analysis, the reference graph is modified ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Biases in smoke radiative effect caused by different sources of confounding. 4. Conclusions and perspectives We applied causal inference to estimate the observed radiative effect of smoke aerosols over the South￾East Atlantic. We find that BBAs cause a total radiative effect of -2.5 W m−2 with approximately equal contributions from the direct, indirect and semi-direct effects. Contrary to many modeling stu… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Biomass burning aerosols (BBAs) from Southern Africa seasonally overlie the semi-permanent South-East Atlantic (SEA) stratocumulus deck, impacting the region's energy budget through complex aerosol-cloud-radiation-meteorology interactions. Climate model intercomparison initiatives, like the Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models (AeroCom), have highlighted the large inter-model variability for BBA radiative effects, especially over the SEA, due to parameterization of emission modeling and smoke properties. Observational constraints are needed to reduce these uncertainties, but correlative observational studies are typically affected by confounding meteorological influences. We propose a physically informed statistical approach, based on causal graphs applied to satellite observations, to disentangle BBA influences on shortwave radiation over the SEA and identify the main sources of statistical biases plaguing observational studies. We find that, during the fire season, BBAs cause a regional shortwave cooling of -2.5 W m$^{-2}$, which can be decomposed into equal contributions from three physical pathways: aerosol-radiation interactions (ARI), adjustments to ARI, and aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). We also perform ablation experiments with graph variants to investigate the main sources of confounding - like large-scale winds, humidity-biased retrievals or spatial aggregation of data - and show that they result in biased radiative effect estimates (between -50 $\%$ and +15 $\%$). Once free of such biases, our derived causal estimates of smoke radiative effects can be used as observational constraints to improve climate models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies causal graphs to satellite observations to isolate the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols (BBAs) over the South-East Atlantic stratocumulus region. It reports a net shortwave cooling of -2.5 W m^{-2} during the fire season that decomposes into equal contributions from aerosol-radiation interactions (ARI), ARI adjustments, and aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). Ablation tests on alternative graph structures are used to quantify biases arising from large-scale winds, humidity-related retrieval artifacts, and spatial aggregation, with deviations ranging from -50% to +15%.

Significance. If the causal identification is valid, the work supplies an observationally constrained estimate of BBA radiative forcing that can serve as a benchmark for AeroCom-style model intercomparisons. The explicit decomposition into three physical pathways offers mechanistic guidance for parameterization development, while the ablation experiments provide a transparent robustness check that is uncommon in correlative aerosol studies. The method of using do-calculus adjustments on satellite data to address confounding represents a methodological advance for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (causal graph construction)] Methods (causal graph and identification): The headline -2.5 W m^{-2} value and the claimed equality of the three pathways rest on the assumption that the retained DAG blocks all backdoor paths from meteorology and retrieval biases to both BBA loading and shortwave flux. The ablation results show shifts up to 50% across graph variants, yet the manuscript provides no formal demonstration (e.g., via additional sensitivity tests with reanalysis subsidence or hygroscopicity proxies) that the chosen graph is complete. This directly affects the quantitative claim and the decomposition.
  2. [Results] Results (error propagation and data processing): The abstract and results present the -2.5 W m^{-2} estimate without accompanying uncertainty ranges derived from retrieval errors, sampling variability, or the causal adjustment formula. The soundness of the central numerical result cannot be evaluated until the full data-processing pipeline and propagation of uncertainties are documented.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could state the exact spatial domain and months over which the -2.5 W m^{-2} regional average is computed.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly label which graph variant corresponds to the primary result versus the ablation cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive evaluation of the manuscript's significance. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods (causal graph construction)] Methods (causal graph and identification): The headline -2.5 W m^{-2} value and the claimed equality of the three pathways rest on the assumption that the retained DAG blocks all backdoor paths from meteorology and retrieval biases to both BBA loading and shortwave flux. The ablation results show shifts up to 50% across graph variants, yet the manuscript provides no formal demonstration (e.g., via additional sensitivity tests with reanalysis subsidence or hygroscopicity proxies) that the chosen graph is complete. This directly affects the quantitative claim and the decomposition.

    Authors: We agree that the validity of the headline estimate and the equal decomposition into ARI, ARI adjustments, and ACI hinges on the chosen DAG blocking all relevant backdoor paths. The graph is constructed from established physical understanding of meteorology-aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions over the SEA stratocumulus region, and the ablation experiments on alternative structures already quantify the magnitude of biases from unaccounted confounders (large-scale winds, humidity artifacts, spatial aggregation), producing deviations between -50% and +15%. These ablations serve as a transparent robustness check. However, we acknowledge that additional formal sensitivity tests using reanalysis subsidence rates and hygroscopicity proxies would provide stronger evidence that no material backdoor paths remain unblocked. We will incorporate these tests in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (error propagation and data processing): The abstract and results present the -2.5 W m^{-2} estimate without accompanying uncertainty ranges derived from retrieval errors, sampling variability, or the causal adjustment formula. The soundness of the central numerical result cannot be evaluated until the full data-processing pipeline and propagation of uncertainties are documented.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of uncertainty ranges limits evaluation of the central -2.5 W m^{-2} estimate. The current manuscript prioritizes the causal decomposition and the ablation-based bias quantification but does not include a full propagation of retrieval errors, sampling variability, or uncertainties from the do-calculus adjustment. In the revision we will document the complete data-processing pipeline in the methods and add uncertainty ranges obtained via bootstrap resampling and analytic propagation through the causal formula. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: causal effect computed from data under assumed DAG

full rationale

The paper estimates the shortwave radiative effect of biomass burning aerosols by applying do-calculus (or equivalent adjustment) to satellite retrievals conditioned on a proposed causal graph. The reported value of -2.5 W m^{-2} and the equal three-way decomposition into ARI, ARI adjustments, and ACI are direct outputs of this adjustment procedure applied to the observational data. No equation defines the target quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz. Ablation tests on graph variants quantify sensitivity but do not create self-referential reduction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data once the graph is stipulated.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms; the approach relies on standard causal inference assumptions (no unmeasured confounding once graph is specified) and domain knowledge of aerosol-cloud-radiation processes.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The causal graph encodes all relevant physical relationships between biomass burning aerosols, meteorology, clouds, and radiation.
    Invoked to justify blocking paths for identification; stated implicitly by the proposal of a 'physically informed statistical approach based on causal graphs'.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5591 in / 1423 out tokens · 57808 ms · 2026-05-10T17:33:20.745235+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adebiyi and Paquita Zuidema

    Adeyemi A. Adebiyi and Paquita Zuidema. The role of the southern African easterly jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 142 0 (697): 0 1574--1589, 2016. doi:10.1002/qj.2765

  2. [2]

    Campbell, Robert E

    Ricardo Alfaro-Contreras , Jianglong Zhang, James R. Campbell, Robert E. Holz, and Jeffrey S. Reid. Evaluating the impact of aerosol particles above cloud on cloud optical depth retrievals from MODIS . Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119 0 (9): 0 5410--5423, 2014. doi:10.1002/2013JD021270

  3. [3]

    Allen, Anahita Amiri-Farahani , Jean-Francois Lamarque, Chris Smith, Drew Shindell, Taufiq Hassan, and Chul E

    Robert J. Allen, Anahita Amiri-Farahani , Jean-Francois Lamarque, Chris Smith, Drew Shindell, Taufiq Hassan, and Chul E. Chung. Observationally constrained aerosol--cloud semi-direct effects. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2 0 (1): 0 1--12, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41612-019-0073-9

  4. [4]

    Bar\'o P\'erez, M

    A. Bar\'o P\'erez, M. S. Diamond, F. A.-M. Bender, A. Devasthale, M. Schwarz, J. Savre, J. Tonttila, H. Kokkola, H. Lee, D. Painemal, and A. M. L. Ekman. Comparing the simulated influence of biomass burning plumes on low-level clouds over the southeastern atlantic under varying smoke conditions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24 0 (8): 0 4591--4610, 2...

  5. [5]

    u lmenst \

    N. Bellouin, J. Quaas, E. Gryspeerdt, S. Kinne, P. Stier, D. Watson-Parris, O. Boucher, K. S. Carslaw, M. Christensen, A.-L. Daniau, J.-L. Dufresne, G. Feingold, S. Fiedler, P. Forster, A. Gettelman, J. M. Haywood, U. Lohmann, F. Malavelle, T. Mauritsen, D. T. McCoy, G. Myhre, J. M \"u lmenst \"a dt, D. Neubauer, A. Possner, M. Rugenstein, Y. Sato, M. Sch...

  6. [6]

    u ller, Rene Preusker, J \

    Jean-Louis Brenguier, Hanna Pawlowska, Lothar Sch \"u ller, Rene Preusker, J \"u rgen Fischer, and Yves Fouquart. Radiative Properties of Boundary Layer Clouds : Droplet Effective Radius versus Number Concentration . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 57 0 (6): 0 803--821, 2000. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0803:RPOBLC>2.0.CO;2

  7. [7]

    Carter, Colette L

    Therese S. Carter, Colette L. Heald, Christopher D. Cappa, Jesse H. Kroll, Teresa L. Campos, Hugh Coe, Michael I. Cotterell, Nicholas W. Davies, Delphine K. Farmer, Cathyrn Fox, Lauren A. Garofalo, Lu Hu, Justin M. Langridge, Ezra J. T. Levin, Shane M. Murphy, Rudra P. Pokhrel, Yingjie Shen, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, and Huihui Wu. Investigating Car...

  8. [8]

    Ching, N

    J. Ching, N. Riemer, and M. West. Black carbon mixing state impacts on cloud microphysical properties: Effects of aerosol plume and environmental conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121 0 (10): 0 5990--6013, 2016. ISSN 2169-8996. doi:10.1002/2016JD024851. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2016JD024851. \_eprint: htt...

  9. [9]

    Diamond, A

    MS. Diamond, A. Dobracki, S. Freitag, J. Small-Griswold, A. Heikkila, S. Howell, M. Kacarab, J. Podolske, P. Saide, and R. Wood. Time-dependent entrainment of smoke presents an observational challenge for assessing aerosol--cloud interactions over the southeast Atlantic Ocean . Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18 0 (19): 0 14623--14636, 2018. doi:10.519...

  10. [10]

    Diamond, P

    MS. Diamond, P. Saide, P. Zuidema, A. Ackerman, S. Doherty, A. Fridlind, H. Gordon, C. Howes, J. Kazil, T. Yamaguchi, J. Zhang, G. Feingold, and R. Wood. Cloud adjustments from large-scale smoke--circulation interactions strongly modulate the southeastern Atlantic stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22 0 (18): 0 12113--...

  11. [11]

    Doelling, Norman G

    David R. Doelling, Norman G. Loeb, Dennis F. Keyes, Michele L. Nordeen, Daniel Morstad, Cathy Nguyen, Bruce A. Wielicki, David F. Young, and Moguo Sun. Geostationary Enhanced Temporal Interpolation for CERES Flux Products . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 30 0 (6): 0 1072--1090, June 2013. ISSN 0739-0572, 1520-0426. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00136.1

  12. [12]

    Doelling, Moguo Sun, Le Trang Nguyen, Michele L

    David R. Doelling, Moguo Sun, Le Trang Nguyen, Michele L. Nordeen, Conor O. Haney, Dennis F. Keyes, and Pamela E. Mlynczak. Advances in Geostationary - Derived Longwave Fluxes for the CERES Synoptic ( SYN1deg ) Product . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 33 0 (3): 0 503--521, March 2016. ISSN 0739-0572, 1520-0426. doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0147.1

  13. [13]

    Doherty, Pablo E

    Sarah J. Doherty, Pablo E. Saide, Paquita Zuidema, Yohei Shinozuka, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Hamish Gordon, Marc Mallet, Kerry Meyer, David Painemal, Steven G. Howell, Steffen Freitag, Amie Dobracki, James R. Podolske, Sharon P. Burton, Richard A. Ferrare, Calvin Howes, Pierre Nabat, Gregory R. Carmichael, Arlindo da Silva , Kristina Pistone, Ian Chang, Lan Ga...

  14. [14]

    E. Fons, I. L. McCoy, T. Beucler, D. Neubauer, and U. Lohmann. Data for dissipating the correlation smokescreen: Causal decomposition of the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols over the south-east atlantic, 2026 a . Climate Informatics Conference 2026, Lausanne. Zenodo

  15. [15]

    E. Fons, I. L. McCoy, T. Beucler, D. Neubauer, and U. Lohmann. Software for dissipating the correlation smokescreen: Causal decomposition of the radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols over the south-east atlantic, 2026 b . Climate Informatics Conference 2026, Lausanne. Zenodo

  16. [16]

    Stratocumulus adjustments to aerosol perturbations disentangled with a causal approach

    Emilie Fons, Jakob Runge, David Neubauer, and Ulrike Lohmann. Stratocumulus adjustments to aerosol perturbations disentangled with a causal approach. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6 0 (1), 2023. doi:10.1038/s41612-023-00452-w

  17. [17]

    S. J. Ghan. Technical Note : Estimating aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13 0 (19): 0 9971--9974, 2013. doi:10.5194/acp-13-9971-2013

  18. [18]

    Giuffrida, K

    E. Giuffrida, K. Johnson, T. Tatro, P. Zuidema, and H. Gordon. Biomass burning aerosol radiative effects in the southeast atlantic depend strongly on meteorological forcing method. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 25 0 (21): 0 14879--14907, 2025. doi:10.5194/acp-25-14879-2025. URL https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/14879/2025/

  19. [19]

    B. S. Grandey and P. Stier. A critical look at spatial scale choices in satellite-based aerosol indirect effect studies. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10 0 (23): 0 11459--11470, 2010. doi:10.5194/acp-10-11459-2010

  20. [20]

    Gryspeerdt, J

    E. Gryspeerdt, J. Quaas, and N. Bellouin. Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud fraction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121 0 (7): 0 3566--3583, 2016. doi:10.1002/2015JD023744

  21. [21]

    McFarquhar, Joseph R

    Siddhant Gupta, Greg M. McFarquhar, Joseph R. O'Brien, David J. Delene, Michael R. Poellot, Amie Dobracki, James R. Podolske, Jens Redemann, Samuel E. LeBlanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer , and Kristina Pistone. Impact of the variability in vertical separation between biomass burning aerosols and marine stratocumulus on cloud microphysical properties over th...

  22. [22]

    doi:10.24381/cds.adbb2d47 , note =

    H Hersbach, B Bell, P Berrisford, G Biavati, A Hor \'a nyi, J Mu \ n oz Sabater, J Nicolas, C Peubey, R Radu, I Rozum, D. Schepers, A. Simmons, C. Soci, D. Dee, and J-N. Th \'e baut. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1959 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), 2018 a . doi:10.24381/cds.adbb2d47

  23. [23]

    Hersbach, B

    H Hersbach, B Bell, P Berrisford, G Biavati, A Hor \'a nyi, J Mu \ n oz Sabater, J Nicolas, C Peubey, R Radu, I Rozum, D Schepers, A Simmons, C Soci, D Dee, and J-N Th \'e baut. ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1959 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), 2018 b . doi:10.24381/cds.bd0915c6

  24. [24]

    Imbens and Donald B

    Guido Imbens and Donald Rubin. Causal Inference for Statistics , Social , and Biomedical Sciences : An Introduction . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139025751

  25. [25]

    URL https://acp.copernicus.org/ articles/19/3515/2019/

    Antje Inness, Melanie Ades, Anna Agustí-Panareda, Jérôme Barré, Anna Benedictow, Anne-Marlene Blechschmidt, Juan Jose Dominguez, Richard Engelen, Henk Eskes, Johannes Flemming, Vincent Huijnen, Luke Jones, Zak Kipling, Sebastien Massart, Mark Parrington, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Miha Razinger, Samuel Remy, Michael Schulz, and Martin Suttie. The CAMS reanalysi...

  26. [26]

    Kacenelenbogen, Mark A

    Melo \"e S. Kacenelenbogen, Mark A. Vaughan, Jens Redemann, Stuart A. Young, Zhaoyan Liu, Yongxiang Hu, Ali H. Omar, Samuel LeBlanc, Yohei Shinozuka, John Livingston, Qin Zhang, and Kathleen A. Powell. Estimations of global shortwave direct aerosol radiative effects above opaque water clouds using a combination of A-Train satellite sensors. Atmospheric Ch...

  27. [27]

    Koch and A

    D. Koch and A. D. Del Genio. Black carbon semi-direct effects on cloud cover: Review and synthesis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10 0 (16): 0 7685--7696, 2010. doi:10.5194/acp-10-7685-2010

  28. [28]

    o hler. Zur Kondensation des Wasserdampfes in der Atmosph \

    Hilding K \"o hler. Zur Kondensation des Wasserdampfes in der Atmosph \"a re . I kommission hos Cammermeyers boghandel Kristiania, 1921

  29. [29]

    Loeb and Gregory L

    Norman G. Loeb and Gregory L. Schuster. An observational study of the relationship between cloud, aerosol and meteorology in broken low-level cloud conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113 0 (D14), 2008. doi:10.1029/2007JD009763

  30. [30]

    Can the direct and semi-direct aerosol effect compete with the indirect effect on a global scale? Geophysical Research Letters, 28 0 (1): 0 159--161, 2001

    Ulrike Lohmann and Johann Feichter. Can the direct and semi-direct aerosol effect compete with the indirect effect on a global scale? Geophysical Research Letters, 28 0 (1): 0 159--161, 2001. doi:10.1029/2000GL012051

  31. [31]

    Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment

    Ulrike Lohmann, Johann Feichter, Joyce Penner, and Richard Leaitch. Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 105 0 (D10): 0 12193--12206, 2000. doi:10.1029/1999JD901199

  32. [32]

    Global Energy Budget, page 323–334

    Ulrike Lohmann, Felix Lüönd, and Fabian Mahrt. Global Energy Budget, page 323–334. Cambridge University Press, 2016 a

  33. [33]

    Microphysical processes in warm clouds, page 186–217

    Ulrike Lohmann, Felix Lüönd, and Fabian Mahrt. Microphysical processes in warm clouds, page 186–217. Cambridge University Press, 2016 b

  34. [34]

    Zheng Lu, Xiaohong Liu, Zhibo Zhang, Chun Zhao, Kerry Meyer, Chamara Rajapakshe, Chenglai Wu, Zhifeng Yang, and Joyce E. Penner. Biomass smoke from southern Africa can significantly enhance the brightness of stratocumulus over the southeastern Atlantic Ocean . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 0 (12): 0 2924--2929, 2018. doi:10.1073/pna...

  35. [35]

    Marc Mallet, Fabien Solmon, Pierre Nabat, Nellie Elguindi, Fabien Waquet, Dominique Bouniol, Andrew Mark Sayer, Kerry Meyer, Romain Roehrig, Martine Michou, Paquita Zuidema, Cyrille Flamant, Jens Redemann, and Paola Formenti. Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic ( SEA ) and its sensitivity to abs...

  36. [36]

    Myhre, B

    G. Myhre, B. H. Samset, M. Schulz, Y. Balkanski, S. Bauer, T. K. Berntsen, H. Bian, N. Bellouin, M. Chin, T. Diehl, R. C. Easter, J. Feichter, S. J. Ghan, D. Hauglustaine, T. Iversen, S. Kinne, A. Kirkev g, J.-F. Lamarque, G. Lin, X. Liu, M. T. Lund, G. Luo, X. Ma, T. van Noije , J. E. Penner, P. J. Rasch, A. Ruiz, Seland, R. B. Skeie, P. Stier, T. Takemu...

  37. [37]

    ortner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. L\

    C. Parmesan, M.D. Morecroft, Y. Trisurat, R. Adrian, G.Z. Anshari, A. Arneth, Q. Gao, P. Gonzalez, R. Harris, J. Price, N. Stevens, and G.H. Talukdarr. Terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems and their services. In Climate Change 2022 -- Impacts , Adaptation and Vulnerability : Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernm...

  38. [38]

    2009.Causality(2 ed.)

    Judea Pearl. Causality: Models , Reasoning , and Inference . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 edition, 2009. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803161

  39. [39]

    da Silva , Gonzalo Ferrada, Pablo E

    Kristina Pistone, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, Michael Diamond, Arlindo M. da Silva , Gonzalo Ferrada, Pablo E. Saide, Rei Ueyama, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, James Podolske, David Noone, Ryan Bennett, Eric Stith, Gregory Carmichael, Jens Redemann, Connor Flynn, Samuel LeBlanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer , and Yohei Shinozuka. Exploring the elevated wat...

  40. [40]

    Platnick, M

    S. Platnick, M. King, and P. Hubanks. MODIS Atmosphere L3 Daily Product . NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System , Goddard Space Flight Center , USA ., 2015

  41. [41]

    Quaas, O

    J. Quaas, O. Boucher, and U. Lohmann. Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the LMDZ and ECHAM4 GCMs using MODIS satellite data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6 0 (4): 0 947--955, 2006. doi:10.5194/acp-6-947-2006

  42. [42]

    Scott, Dominick V

    Alexandru Rap, Catherine E. Scott, Dominick V. Spracklen, Nicolas Bellouin, Piers M. Forster, Kenneth S. Carslaw, Anja Schmidt, and Graham Mann. Natural aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects. Geophysical Research Letters, 40 0 (12): 0 3297--3301, 2013. doi:10.1002/grl.50441

  43. [43]

    Doherty, Bernadette Luna, Samuel E

    Jens Redemann, Robert Wood, Paquita Zuidema, Sarah J. Doherty, Bernadette Luna, Samuel E. LeBlanc, Michael S. Diamond, Yohei Shinozuka, Ian Y. Chang, Rei Ueyama, Leonhard Pfister, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Amie N. Dobracki, Arlindo M. da Silva , Karla M. Longo, Melo \"e S. Kacenelenbogen, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Nichola M. Knox, Stuart J. Piketh, James M. H...

  44. [44]

    C. Reid, M. Brauer, F. Johnston, M. Jerrett, J. Balmes, and C. Elliott. Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure . Environmental Health Perspectives, 124 0 (9): 0 1334--1343, 2016. doi:10.1289/ehp.1409277

  45. [45]

    J. S. Reid, T. F. Eck, S. A. Christopher, R. Koppmann, O. Dubovik, D. P. Eleuterio, B. N. Holben, E. A. Reid, and J. Zhang. A review of biomass burning emissions part III : Intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5 0 (3): 0 827--849, 2005. doi:10.5194/acp-5-827-2005

  46. [46]

    Donges, Jaroslav Hlinka, Nikola Jajcay, Martin Vejmelka, David Hartman, Norbert Marwan, Milan Palu s , and J \"u rgen Kurths

    Jakob Runge, Vladimir Petoukhov, Jonathan F. Donges, Jaroslav Hlinka, Nikola Jajcay, Martin Vejmelka, David Hartman, Norbert Marwan, Milan Palu s , and J \"u rgen Kurths. Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems. Nature Communications, 6 0 (1): 0 8502, 2015. doi:10.1038/ncomms9502

  47. [47]

    Causal inference for time series

    Jakob Runge, Andreas Gerhardus, Gherardo Varando, Veronika Eyring, and Gustau Camps-Valls . Causal inference for time series. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, pages 1--19, June 2023. doi:10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y

  48. [48]

    Naoko Sakaeda, Robert Wood, and P. Rasch. Direct and semidirect aerosol effects of southern African biomass burning aerosol. J. Geophys. Res, 116, 2011. doi:10.1029/2010JD015540

  49. [49]

    Stier, N

    P. Stier, N. a. J. Schutgens, N. Bellouin, H. Bian, O. Boucher, M. Chin, S. Ghan, N. Huneeus, S. Kinne, G. Lin, X. Ma, G. Myhre, J. E. Penner, C. A. Randles, B. Samset, M. Schulz, T. Takemura, F. Yu, H. Yu, and C. Zhou. Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: Results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study. Atmospheric C...

  50. [50]

    Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei

    Philip Stier. Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16 0 (10): 0 6595--6607, 2016. doi:10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016

  51. [51]

    R. S. Stone, J. A. Augustine, E. G. Dutton, N. T. O'Neill, and A. Saha. Empirical determinations of the longwave and shortwave radiative forcing efficiencies of wildfire smoke. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116 0 (D12), 2011. ISSN 2156-2202. doi:10.1029/2010JD015471. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2010JD015471

  52. [52]

    Szopa, V

    S. Szopa, V. Naik, B. Adhikary, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, W.D. Collins, S. Fuzzi, L. Gallardo, A. Kiendler-Scharr, Z. Klimont, H. Liao, N. Unger, and P. Zanis. Short-lived climate forcers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis . Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , pag...

  53. [53]

    S. Twomey. The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 34 0 (7): 0 1149--1152, 1977. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2

  54. [54]

    Margreet J. E. van Marle , Silvia Kloster, Brian I. Magi, Jennifer R. Marlon, Anne-Laure Daniau, Robert D. Field, Almut Arneth, Matthew Forrest, Stijn Hantson, Natalie M. Kehrwald, Wolfgang Knorr, Gitta Lasslop, Fang Li, St \'e phane Mangeon, Chao Yue, Johannes W. Kaiser, and Guido R. van der Werf . Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 ( BB...

  55. [55]

    Temperature-dependence of the near- UV absorption of water vapor in the 290--350nm range

    Zhe-Chen Wang, Bangsheng Yin, Qilong Min, and Lei Zhu. Temperature-dependence of the near- UV absorption of water vapor in the 290--350nm range. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 286: 0 108204, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108204

  56. [56]

    E. M. Wilcox. Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10 0 (23): 0 11769--11777, 2010. doi:10.5194/acp-10-11769-2010

  57. [57]

    Correlation and Causation

    Sewall Wright. Correlation and Causation . Journal of Agricultural Research, 20: 0 557--585., 1921

  58. [58]

    van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Susanne E

    Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido R. van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Tero Mielonen, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Alf Kirkevåg, Dirk J. L. Olivié, Harri Kokkola, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, and Mian Chin. Using modelled relationships...

  59. [59]

    et al.: pangeo-data/xESMF: Universal Regridder for Geospatial Data, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4294774,

    J Zhuang, R Dussin, D Huard, P Bourgault, A Banihirwe, S Raynaud, B Malevich, M Schupfner, S Levang, C Gauthier, et al. pangeo-data/xesmf: v0. 8.2. Zenodo, 8356796, 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4294774

  60. [60]

    Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic : Upcoming Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol 's Impact on Climate

    Paquita Zuidema, Jens Redemann, James Haywood, Robert Wood, Stuart Piketh, Martin Hipondoka, and Paola Formenti. Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic : Upcoming Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol 's Impact on Climate . Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97 0 (7): 0 1131--1135, 2016. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00082.1