pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08319 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: unknown

Orbital-Selective d-wave Superconductivity in the Two-Band t-J Model: Possible Applications to La₃Ni₂O₇

Zhan Wang , Kun Jiang , Fu-Chun Zhang , Hui-Ke Jin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords orbital-selective superconductivitytwo-band t-J modeld-wave pairingLa3Ni2O7nickelatesvariational Monte Carlomulti-orbital effectssuperexchange
0
0 comments X

The pith

A robust orbital-selective d-wave superconducting state emerges exclusively from the itinerant orbital in the two-band t-J model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses variational Monte Carlo to examine a two-band t-J model with one itinerant orbital and one quasi-localized orbital, motivated by the nickelate La3Ni2O7. It shows that d-wave superconductivity arises only in the itinerant orbital, while the quasi-localized orbital promotes local inter-orbital bound states that act as defects breaking phase coherence. The superconducting order parameter decreases steadily as the occupancy of the localized orbital rises. This demonstrates that multi-orbital effects go beyond single-band t-J descriptions and identifies a concrete path to higher critical temperature by reducing localized orbital participation.

Core claim

In the two-band t-J model consisting of an itinerant orbital and a quasi-localized orbital, variational Monte Carlo reveals a robust orbital-selective d-wave superconducting state that develops exclusively from the itinerant orbital. An analysis of the superexchange energy hierarchy shows that the quasi-localized orbital favors local inter-orbital bound states, which function as energy defects disrupting phase coherence. Consequently, the superconducting order parameter is monotonically suppressed with increasing occupancy of the quasi-localized orbital.

What carries the argument

Orbital-selective d-wave pairing in the two-band t-J model, where superexchange hierarchy in the quasi-localized orbital generates competing inter-orbital bound states that suppress coherence.

Load-bearing premise

The variational Monte Carlo trial wave function and the chosen parameters of the two-band t-J model faithfully represent the ground state of the nickelate without significant bias from the ansatz or neglected longer-range interactions.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement in La3Ni2O7 showing that the superconducting transition temperature fails to rise when the occupancy or involvement of the localized d_z2-derived orbital is reduced.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08319 by Fu-Chun Zhang, Hui-Ke Jin, Kun Jiang, Zhan Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate superconductivity in a two-band $t$-$J$ model consisting of an itinerant orbital (orbital-0) and a quasi-localized orbital (orbital-1) using variational Monte Carlo. A robust orbital-selective $d$-wave superconducting state is found to emerge exclusively from the itinerant orbital. An analysis of the superexchange energy hierarchy shows that the quasi-localized orbital-1 competes with superconductivity by favoring local inter-orbital bound states, which act as energy defects and disrupt phase coherence. Consistently, the superconducting order parameter is monotonically suppressed as the occupancy of orbital-1 increases. Motivated by superconductivity in nickelate La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$, these results highlight the essential role of multi-orbital physics beyond the single-band $t$-$J$ framework and point to a concrete route to enhance $T_c$: suppressing the involvement of localized $d_{z^2}$-derived orbitals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies superconductivity in a two-band t-J model with an itinerant orbital (orbital-0) and a quasi-localized orbital (orbital-1) via variational Monte Carlo. It reports a robust orbital-selective d-wave superconducting state emerging exclusively from the itinerant orbital, with the quasi-localized orbital suppressing superconductivity through local inter-orbital bound states that act as energy defects and disrupt phase coherence. The superconducting order parameter decreases monotonically with increasing orbital-1 occupancy. The work is motivated by La₃Ni₂O₇ and argues that multi-orbital effects beyond the single-band t-J model are essential, with a proposed route to higher T_c by reducing involvement of localized d_{z²}-derived orbitals.

Significance. If the VMC results prove robust, the paper would usefully demonstrate that orbital selectivity in nickelate superconductivity arises naturally from the competition between itinerant and localized orbitals in a minimal t-J framework. The direct numerical evidence for monotonic suppression and the superexchange-based explanation of local bound states provide a concrete, falsifiable picture that goes beyond single-band models. The suggestion that suppressing localized-orbital participation could raise T_c is a clear, testable implication for material engineering.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / VMC implementation] The central claim that a robust orbital-selective d-wave state emerges exclusively from orbital-0 rests on the faithfulness of the VMC trial wave function. Without explicit specification of the ansatz (Gutzwiller projection, Jastrow factors, inter-orbital pairing terms, and variational parameters for hopping/pairing), it is impossible to rule out systematic bias that artificially favors itinerant-orbital pairing while underestimating competing orders or longer-range interactions omitted from the Hamiltonian. This is load-bearing for the reported monotonic suppression and the energy-hierarchy analysis.
  2. [Results / superexchange analysis] The superexchange energy hierarchy analysis (used to argue that orbital-1 creates local bound states acting as defects) lacks quantitative support such as explicit energy differences, finite-size scaling of the order parameter, or comparisons to exact diagonalization on small clusters. Without these, the claim that orbital-1 disrupts phase coherence remains qualitative and does not yet substantiate the exclusivity of the orbital-selective state.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction should include a brief statement of the specific model parameters (hopping ratios, J values, doping) chosen to represent La₃Ni₂O₇, as these choices directly affect the reported trends.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for the order-parameter plots should explicitly state the system sizes used and whether the data are extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. We address each major comment in detail below and have updated the manuscript to improve clarity and provide additional quantitative support where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / VMC implementation] The central claim that a robust orbital-selective d-wave state emerges exclusively from orbital-0 rests on the faithfulness of the VMC trial wave function. Without explicit specification of the ansatz (Gutzwiller projection, Jastrow factors, inter-orbital pairing terms, and variational parameters for hopping/pairing), it is impossible to rule out systematic bias that artificially favors itinerant-orbital pairing while underestimating competing orders or longer-range interactions omitted from the Hamiltonian. This is load-bearing for the reported monotonic suppression and the energy-hierarchy analysis.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for greater detail on the VMC ansatz. The trial wave function is a Gutzwiller-projected BCS state with orbital-dependent hopping and pairing parameters that are variationally optimized. Jastrow factors are included to account for density correlations, but no inter-orbital pairing terms are present in the ansatz, consistent with the observed orbital selectivity. The variational parameters are optimized by minimizing the energy expectation value using stochastic reconfiguration. To address the concern, we have revised the Methods section to explicitly list all components of the ansatz and the optimization procedure. We have also verified that the energy of the orbital-selective d-wave state is lower than that of competing orders such as antiferromagnetism or s-wave pairing, supporting that the results are not due to bias in the trial function. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / superexchange analysis] The superexchange energy hierarchy analysis (used to argue that orbital-1 creates local bound states acting as defects) lacks quantitative support such as explicit energy differences, finite-size scaling of the order parameter, or comparisons to exact diagonalization on small clusters. Without these, the claim that orbital-1 disrupts phase coherence remains qualitative and does not yet substantiate the exclusivity of the orbital-selective state.

    Authors: We agree that providing more quantitative details would strengthen the superexchange analysis. In the revised version, we include explicit values for the superexchange energy differences between configurations with and without local inter-orbital bound states, demonstrating an energy gain of approximately 0.05t favoring the bound states. Additionally, we present finite-size scaling results for the superconducting order parameter across system sizes from 4x4 to 8x8, showing that the suppression with increasing orbital-1 occupancy persists in the thermodynamic limit. While direct exact diagonalization comparisons are computationally prohibitive for the full two-band model on clusters beyond very small sizes due to the Hilbert space dimension, the VMC results align with the expected energy hierarchy from the superexchange terms. We believe these additions make the argument more quantitative and support the orbital-selective nature of the superconductivity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical VMC study

full rationale

The paper reports direct variational Monte Carlo results for the two-band t-J model, yielding an orbital-selective d-wave state from the itinerant orbital. These outcomes follow from the chosen Hamiltonian, trial wave function, and parameter set without any analytic derivation chain that reduces predictions to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the described methodology or abstract; the work is a self-contained numerical exploration of the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete; the work rests on the standard assumptions of the t-J model and the accuracy of the chosen variational ansatz.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The two-band t-J model with one itinerant and one quasi-localized orbital captures the essential physics of La3Ni2O7
    Invoked in the motivation and conclusion of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5492 in / 1200 out tokens · 64033 ms · 2026-05-10T17:36:28.280032+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Superconductivity in bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$: A review focusing on the strong-coupling Hund's rule assisted pairing mechanism

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 arises from interlayer Cooper pairs of 3d_x2-y2 electrons driven by effective J_perp from Hund-assisted AFM exchange transfer, while localized 3d_z2 electrons form rung singlets that prod...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, P. A. Lee, M. Randeria, T. M. Rice, N. Trivedi, and F. C. Zhang, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, R755 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Review of Modern Physics78, 17 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Za- anen, Nature518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Physical Review B37, 3759 (1988)

    1988

  5. [5]

    Ogata and H

    M. Ogata and H. Fukuyama, Reports on Progress in Physics71, 036501 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    F. C. Zhang, C. Gros, T. M. Rice, and H. Shiba, Superconductor Science and Technology1, 36 (1988)

    1988

  7. [7]

    Yokoyama and H

    H. Yokoyama and H. Shiba, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan57, 2482 (1988)

    1988

  8. [8]

    Gros, Annals of Physics189, 53 (1989)

    C. Gros, Annals of Physics189, 53 (1989)

    1989

  9. [9]

    Himeda and M

    A. Himeda and M. Ogata, Physical Review B60, R9935 (1999)

    1999

  10. [10]

    Giamarchi and C

    T. Giamarchi and C. Lhuillier, Physical Review B43, 12943 (1991)

    1991

  11. [11]

    Yokoyama and M

    H. Yokoyama and M. Ogata, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan65, 3615 (1996)

    1996

  12. [12]

    Paramekanti, M

    A. Paramekanti, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Physical Review Letters87, 217002 (2001)

    2001

  13. [13]

    Ogata and A

    M. Ogata and A. Himeda, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan72, 374 (2003)

    2003

  14. [14]

    Paramekanti, M

    A. Paramekanti, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Physical Review B70, 054504 (2004)

    2004

  15. [15]

    C. T. Shih, Y . C. Chen, C. P. Chou, and T. K. Lee, Physical Review B70, 220502 (2004)

    2004

  16. [16]

    C. C. Tsuei and J. R. Kirtley, Review of Modern Physics72, 969 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Physical Review Letters80, 1272 (1998)

    1998

  18. [18]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Physical Review Letters 113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Science358, 1155 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw ¨ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Collabo- ration on the Many-Electron Problem), Physical Review X10, 031016 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    J. c. v. Chaloupka and G. Khaliullin, Physical Review Letters 100, 016404 (2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    Zhong, Y

    Y . Zhong, Y . Wang, S. Han, Y .-F. Lv, W.-L. Wang, D. Zhang, H. Ding, Y .-M. Zhang, L. Wang, K. He, R. Zhong, J. A. Schnee- loch, G.-D. Gu, C.-L. Song, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Science Bulletin61, 1239 (2016)

    2016

  23. [23]

    Jiang, X

    K. Jiang, X. Wu, J. Hu, and Z. Wang, Physical Review Letters 121, 227002 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    W. M. Li, J. F. Zhao, L. P. Cao, Z. Hu, Q. Z. Huang, X. C. Wang, Y . Liu, G. Q. Zhao, J. Zhang, Q. Q. Liu, R. Z. Yu, Y . W. Long, H. Wu, H. J. Lin, C. T. Chen, Z. Li, Z. Z. Gong, Z. Guguchia, J. S. Kim, G. R. Stewart, Y . J. Uemura, S. Uchida, and C. Q. Jin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 12156 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y . Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y . Cui, Y . Hikita, and H. Y . Hwang, Nature572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y . Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    E. K. Ko, Y . Yu, Y . Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V . Thampy, C.-T. Kuo, B. Y . Wang, Y . Lee, K. Lee, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y . Hwang, Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y . Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y . Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Nature634, 579 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, Y . Li, H. Huang, W.-Q. Chen, Y .-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Nature640, 6 641 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Y . Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y . Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y . Gu, Y . Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y . Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J.-g. Guo, and J. Zhao, Nature631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, D. Peng, X. Du, W. Hu, Y . Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y . Li, H. Liu, C. Wen, J. Song, Y . Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhang, N. Yu, P. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Y . Chen, C. Jin, H. Guo, C. Wu, F. Yang, Q. Zeng, S. Yan, L. Yang, and Y . Qi, Physical Review X15, 021005 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Wang, H.-H

    M. Wang, H.-H. Wen, T. Wu, D.-X. Yao, and T. Xiang, Chinese Physics Letters41, 077402 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Ying, T. Wu, J. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Chen, National Science Review12, nwaf373 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y . D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y . Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y . Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Physical Review X14, 011040 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Su, Y . Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y . Xu, Y . Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, Nature Physics20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Sun, X. Huang, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y . Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Nature Communications 15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y . Lu, M. Wang, Y . Wang, and Z. Chen, Nature630, 847 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Mijit, P

    E. Mijit, P. Ma, C. J. Sahle, A. D. Rosa, Z. Hu, F. D. Angelis, A. Lopez, S. Amatori, G. Tchoudinov, Y . Joly, T. Irifune, J. E. F. S. Rodrigues, G. Garbarino, S. G. Parra, M. Wang, R. Yu, and O. Mathon, (2024), arXiv:2412.08269 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Zhong, J

    Q. Zhong, J. Chen, Z. Qiu, J. Li, X. Huang, P. Ma, M. Huo, H. Dong, H. Sun, and M. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2510.13342 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Z. Qiu, J. Chen, D. V . Semenok, Q. Zhong, D. Zhou, J. Li, P. Ma, X. Huang, M. Huo, T. Xie, X. Chen, H.-k. Mao, V . Struzhkin, H. Sun, and M. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2510.12359 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, and M. Wang, National Science Review 12, nwaf220 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Z.-Y . Cao, D. Peng, S. Choi, F. Lan, L. Yu, E. Zhang, Z. Xing, Y . Liu, F. Zhang, T. Luo, L. Chen, V . T. A. Hong, S.-Y . Paek, H. Jang, J. Xie, H. Liu, H. Lou, Z. Zeng, Y . Ding, J. Zhao, C. Liu, T. Park, Q. Zeng, and H.-k. Mao, (2025), arXiv:2509.12606 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Y . Liu, E. K. Ko, Y . Tarn, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V . Thampy, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, S. Raghu, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, Na- ture Materials , 1 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Y .-T. Hsu, Y . Liu, Y . Kohama, T. Kotte, V . Sharma, Y . Tarn, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, (2025), arXiv:2505.19011 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Y . Tarn, Y . Liu, F. Theuss, J. Li, B. Y . Wang, J. Wang, V . Thampy, Z.-X. Shen, Y . Yu, and H. Y . Hwang, (2025), arXiv:2510.27613 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    B. Y . Wang, Y . Zhong, S. Abadi, Y . Liu, Y . Yu, X. Zhang, Y .-M. Wu, R. Wang, J. Li, Y . Tarn, E. K. Ko, V . Thampy, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y . S. Lee, T. P. Devereaux, C. Jia, H. Y . Hwang, and Z.-X. Shen, (2025), arXiv:2504.16372 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    P. Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Y . Li, C. Yue, H. Huang, L. Xu, J. Shen, Y . Miao, W. Song, Z. Nie, Y . Chen, H. Wang, W. Chen, Y . Huang, Z.-H. Chen, T. Qian, J. Lin, J. He, Y .-J. Sun, Z. Chen, and Q.-K. Xue, National Science Review , nwaf205 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y . Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y .-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y . Wang, Y . Liu, T. Luo, N. Hirao, T. Mat- suoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Nature649, 871 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    M. Shi, D. Peng, K. Fan, Z. Xing, S. Yang, Y . Wang, H. Li, R. Wu, M. Du, B. Ge, Z. Zeng, Q. Zeng, J. Ying, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Nature Physics21, 1780 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    J. Shen, Y . Miao, Z. Ou, G. Zhou, Y . Chen, R. Luan, H. Sun, Z. Feng, X. Yong, P. Li, Y . Li, L. Xu, W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y .-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and J. He, (2025), arXiv:2502.17831 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Z. Dong, G. Wang, N. Wang, W.-H. Dong, L. Gu, Y . Xu, J. Cheng, Z. Chen, and Y . Wang, Nature Materials24, 1927 (2025)

    1927

  52. [52]

    B. Hao, M. Wang, W. Sun, Y . Yang, Z. Mao, S. Yan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Ji, and Y . Nie, Nature Materials24, 1756 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    W. Sun, Z. Jiang, B. Hao, S. Yan, H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y . Yang, H. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Ji, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Shen, D. Feng, and Y . Nie, (2025), arXiv:2507.07409 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Osada, C

    M. Osada, C. Terakura, A. Kikkawa, M. Nakajima, H.-Y . Chen, Y . Nomura, Y . Tokura, and A. Tsukazaki, Communications Physics8, 251 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W ´u, and D.-X. Yao, Physical Re- view Letters131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Physical Review B108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Yang, G.-M

    Y .-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Physical Review B 108, L201108 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y .-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Physical Review Letters131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B ¨otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Physi- cal Review B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y . Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Physical Review B108, 214522 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Jiang, Z

    K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F.-C. Zhang, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 017402 (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    Fan, J.-F

    Z. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X.-Y . Jiang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Physical Review B110, 024514 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Physical Review Letters 132, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review Letters132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Physical Review Letters132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Xue and F

    J.-R. Xue and F. Wang, Chinese Physics Letters41, 057403 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Physical Review Letters 133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    Y . Wang, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu, Physical Review B110, 205122 (2024)

    2024

  69. [69]

    Geisler, J

    B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Physical Review B112, L100506 (2025)

    2025

  70. [71]

    Y . Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Zhang, K. Jiang, and J. Hu, (2025), 2501.08536 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    Jiang, Y .-H

    K.-Y . Jiang, Y .-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y . Lu, and Q.-H. Wang, Physical Review Letters134, 076001 (2025)

    2025

  72. [73]

    J. Zhan, Y . Gu, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Physical Review Letters134, 136002 (2025)

    2025

  73. [74]

    Y . Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Physical Review B 7 111, 174506 (2025)

    2025

  74. [75]

    Wang, H.-J

    Z. Wang, H.-J. Zhang, K. Jiang, and F.-C. Zhang, National Sci- ence Review12, nwaf353 (2025)

    2025

  75. [76]

    Z. Wang, Y . Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, and F.-C. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2512.12734 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    Xi, S.-L

    W. Xi, S.-L. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Physical Review B111, 104505 (2025)

    2025

  77. [78]

    Yue, J.-J

    C. Yue, J.-J. Miao, H. Huang, Y . Hua, P. Li, Y . Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Q. Yang, F. Yang, H. Sun, Y .-J. Sun, J. Lin, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and W.-Q. Chen, National Science Review12, nwaf253 (2025)

    2025

  78. [79]

    Kaneko, M

    T. Kaneko, M. Kakoi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review B112, 075143 (2025)

    2025

  79. [80]

    Khaliullin and J

    G. Khaliullin and J. Chaloupka, (2025), 2506.16360 [cond- mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [81]

    Inoue, Y

    D. Inoue, Y . Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Communi- cations Physics9, 115 (2026)

    2026

Showing first 80 references.