arxiv: 2604.08375 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A parametric study of plasma instability cooling and its impact on intergalactic magnetic field constraints in GeV cascades

Suman Dey , Simone Rossoni , G\"unter Sigl

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE

keywords plasma instabilityelectromagnetic cascadeintergalactic magnetic fieldblazarGeV gamma rayspair productioninverse Compton scattering

0 comments

The pith

Plasma instabilities with a characteristic length scale of order 100 kpc cool electron-positron pairs enough to reproduce observed GeV spectra from blazars while implying intergalactic magnetic fields of order 10^{-17} G.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Electromagnetic cascades start when TeV gamma rays from distant sources create electron-positron pairs in the intergalactic medium. These pairs normally upscatter background photons to GeV energies, but plasma instabilities can drain their energy first and suppress the GeV output. The paper adds a simple parameterized cooling term to track this effect and fits the resulting spectra to Fermi-LAT observations of the blazar 1ES 0229+200. It reports that instabilities acting over distances of roughly 100 kiloparsecs allow the data to be matched with a magnetic field strength of about 10^{-17} gauss. This changes how cascade observations are used to bound the weakest magnetic fields in cosmic voids.

Core claim

The paper claims that a parameterized model for plasma instability cooling, when included in cascade development, reproduces the observed GeV photon spectrum of 1ES 0229+200 for instability length scales of order 100 kpc. Under these conditions the best-fit intergalactic magnetic field strength consistent with extended-emission observations at different field-of-view angles is of order 10^{-17} G.

What carries the argument

Parameterized cooling term that reduces the energy of electron-positron pairs before they inverse-Compton scatter background photons to GeV energies.

If this is right

The observed spectrum is reproduced when the instability length scale is of order 100 kpc.
The implied IGMF strength drops to order 10^{-17} G once cooling is included.
Constraints on the field strength vary with the observer's field-of-view angle.
Extended-emission data within the field of view tighten the joint bounds on instability scale and magnetic field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying the same parameterization to other blazars would test whether a single instability scale works across sources.
Weaker IGMF limits would follow for any cascade study that previously omitted instability cooling.
High-resolution spectra could distinguish the 100 kpc scale from other possible cooling lengths.

Load-bearing premise

The ad-hoc parameterized cooling term accurately captures the physical effect of plasma instabilities on pair energy loss before inverse-Compton scattering.

What would settle it

A GeV spectrum from another blazar at comparable redshift that cannot be reproduced for any instability length scale near 100 kpc and any IGMF near 10^{-17} G would falsify the reproduction claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08375 by G\"unter Sigl, Simone Rossoni, Suman Dey.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Schematic representation of the production of secondary GeV photons from the deflection of charged electrons (or positrons) by IGMF. The solid gray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The energy spectrum of 1ES 0229+200 in 10−3 ≤ E/TeV ≤ 102 . The colored solid curves represent the propagated photon spectrum for different IGMF strengths and coherence lengths, without plasma instability cooling. The blue data points represent the Fermi-LAT [19], the green data points show the H.E.S.S. [56], and the orange data points show the VERITAS [57] spectrum. We investigate the energy spectrum, whi… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The energy spectrum of 1ES 0229+200 in 10−3 ≤ E/TeV ≤ 102 . The grey dash-dotted curve shows the propagated photon spectrum without any contribution of the plasma instability cooling (Inst. stands for Instability in the plot legends) and IGMF. The colored solid curves represent the propagated photon spectrum for different IGMF strengths and coherence length combinations, as well as plasma instability cooli… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The lower limits on the IGMF inferred from blazar 1ES 0229 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Energy spectra of 1ES 1101–232 (z ∼ 0.186; top row), H 1426+428 (z ∼ 0.129; middle row), and H 2356–309 (z ∼ 0.165; bottom row) in the energy range 10−3 ≤ E/TeV ≤ 102 . The grey dash-dotted curve shows the propagated photon spectrum without plasma-instability cooling and without IGMF. Colored solid curves represent propagated spectra including plasma instability cooling with λ0 = 120 kpc and α = −0.5, for … view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The χ 2 /ndof test statistic is shown for the GeV-band Fermi-LAT data (ndof = 10). The dashed and solid curves correspond to fields of view θFoV = 1.0 ◦ and 4.5 ◦ , respectively. Different colors indicate the three blazar sources. find that λ0 ≥ 120 kpc (with α = −0.5) represents the bestfit instability-loss scale needed to reproduce the observed photon spectrum. For λ0 < 120 kpc, even in the absence of … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Electromagnetic cascades are initiated by TeV gamma rays propagating through the intergalactic medium (IGM), and they can be used to constrain the weak intergalactic magnetic field (IGMF) in cosmic voids. Primary TeV photons produce electrons and positrons through electromagnetic pair production, which can be deflected out of the line-of-sight to the observer by IGMF. In addition, electron-positron pairs can perturb the IGM, triggering plasma instabilities that can cool down the pairs before they upscatter cosmic background photons to GeV energies via inverse Compton (IC) scattering. We investigate the influence of plasma instabilities on the cascade spectrum by introducing a parameterized model for the instability using a publicly available Monte Carlo framework CRPropa. We use extended-emission observations within the field of view of the observer to constrain the IGMF in the presence of plasma instability cooling. Based on spectral observations of the blazar 1ES 0229+200 from Fermi-LAT, we find the best-fit photon spectrum including the plasma instability and IGMF parameters that reproduces the observational data for different observer field-of-view angles and obtain the IGMF constraint in cosmic voids. We find that plasma instabilities with a characteristic length scale of order $10^{2}~\text{kpc}$ reproduce the observed photon spectrum and imply an IGMF strength of order $10^{-17}~\text{G}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They add a tunable cooling length to CRPropa for plasma instabilities and jointly fit it with IGMF strength to the 1ES 0229+200 spectrum, yielding 10^{-17} G, but the term is inserted by hand without kinetic derivation.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper inserts a simple parameterized loss term into the public CRPropa Monte Carlo code to represent plasma instability cooling of cascade pairs, then varies both that characteristic length (around 100 kpc) and the IGMF strength to match the Fermi-LAT spectrum of 1ES 0229+200 while also checking extended emission for different observer field-of-view angles. They report that this setup reproduces the data and implies an IGMF of order 10^{-17} G in voids. That is the quantitative outcome they highlight. They do use an established code and focus on real observational constraints rather than pure theory, which keeps the work grounded in data. Looking at how the observer angle affects the extended cascade signal is a reasonable practical step for these kinds of studies. The approach is straightforward and could be reproduced by others who already run CRPropa. The central weakness is that the cooling term is introduced parametrically without a derivation from the growth rates, saturation, or wave-particle physics of the relevant instabilities such as oblique two-stream or filamentation. The abstract gives no comparison to plasma simulations or first-principles loss rates, so the length scale is effectively a free knob. Because this knob is adjusted together with the IGMF strength on the same spectral data, the reported field value is not an independent prediction; mismatches in the cooling model can be absorbed into the IGMF number. No error bars, robustness checks against different parameterizations, or validation steps are mentioned. This makes the result sensitive to the specific choice of the ad-hoc term. The paper is mainly for people already working on blazar cascade modeling and IGMF bounds who want to see how one extra parametric effect changes the numbers. A reader looking for new techniques or solid first-principles plasma treatment will not find much here. It is worth sending to peer review so referees can check whether the full text adds any derivation, simulation benchmarks, or clearer separation of the parameters. The work engages honestly with the literature on cascades but does not overcome the degeneracy issue on its own terms.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a parameterized cooling term in CRPropa to model the effect of plasma instabilities on electron-positron pairs in electromagnetic cascades from TeV blazars. Using spectral data from 1ES 0229+200 observed by Fermi-LAT, it fits the instability characteristic length scale (order 100 kpc) jointly with IGMF strength and observer field-of-view to reproduce the GeV cascade spectrum, yielding an IGMF constraint of order 10^{-17} G in cosmic voids.

Significance. If the parameterization accurately captures plasma instability physics, the result would imply that standard IGMF bounds from cascade deflection are incomplete and that plasma cooling can dominate pair energy loss on ~100 kpc scales, altering interpretations of blazar spectra and void magnetic fields. The work demonstrates the sensitivity of cascade modeling to additional loss channels beyond inverse-Compton and magnetic deflection.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and methods] Abstract and methods section: the cooling term is introduced as a free-parameterized loss rate with characteristic length ~10^2 kpc, but no derivation from the growth rate, saturation amplitude, or wave-particle interactions of the oblique two-stream or filamentation instability is provided; the term is inserted by hand into CRPropa rather than computed from plasma kinetics.
[Results] Results section: the reported IGMF strength of ~10^{-17} G is obtained by simultaneously varying the instability scale, B-field amplitude, and observer FOV to fit the same 1ES 0229+200 Fermi spectrum; this creates a degeneracy in which any mismatch between the ad-hoc cooling and actual instability physics can be absorbed into the IGMF value, so the constraint is not an independent prediction.
[Results and discussion] No validation or robustness tests: the manuscript provides neither comparison of the parameterized cooling rate against dedicated plasma simulations nor error bars/uncertainty quantification on the best-fit parameters, nor tests of sensitivity to the functional form of the cooling term.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicit citation of prior analytic and simulation work on IGM plasma instabilities (e.g., growth rates and saturation scales) to clarify how the chosen parameterization relates to existing literature.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should specify the exact functional form of the added cooling term and the precise definition of the characteristic length scale used in the Monte Carlo runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each comment and made revisions to improve the clarity and robustness of our parametric study. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and methods] Abstract and methods section: the cooling term is introduced as a free-parameterized loss rate with characteristic length ~10^2 kpc, but no derivation from the growth rate, saturation amplitude, or wave-particle interactions of the oblique two-stream or filamentation instability is provided; the term is inserted by hand into CRPropa rather than computed from plasma kinetics.

Authors: Our study is explicitly framed as a parametric exploration of the effects of plasma instability cooling, as stated in the title. The parameterization is motivated by order-of-magnitude estimates from the literature on the growth and saturation of instabilities such as the oblique two-stream instability in the context of blazar-induced cascades. We have expanded the methods section to include a brief derivation sketch based on the expected cooling timescale from linear growth rates and saturation amplitudes reported in prior works. The term is implemented in CRPropa to allow Monte Carlo propagation studies, which is the focus of this work rather than a full plasma kinetic simulation. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] Results section: the reported IGMF strength of ~10^{-17} G is obtained by simultaneously varying the instability scale, B-field amplitude, and observer FOV to fit the same 1ES 0229+200 Fermi spectrum; this creates a degeneracy in which any mismatch between the ad-hoc cooling and actual instability physics can be absorbed into the IGMF value, so the constraint is not an independent prediction.

Authors: We agree that there is a degeneracy between the instability cooling scale, IGMF strength, and observer field-of-view in fitting the observed spectrum. We have revised the results section to highlight this and present the IGMF constraint as conditional on the instability scale being of order 100 kpc. To address this, we have included a new figure showing the parameter correlations and chi-squared values, demonstrating that the data prefer lower IGMF when cooling is included. The value of 10^{-17} G represents the best-fit under these assumptions, and we discuss its implications for void magnetic fields. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and discussion] No validation or robustness tests: the manuscript provides neither comparison of the parameterized cooling rate against dedicated plasma simulations nor error bars/uncertainty quantification on the best-fit parameters, nor tests of sensitivity to the functional form of the cooling term.

Authors: We have added uncertainty quantification by reporting error bars on the best-fit parameters derived from the spectral fitting procedure. Additionally, we performed sensitivity tests to variations in the functional form of the cooling term and include these results in the revised discussion. However, a direct comparison to dedicated plasma simulations (such as particle-in-cell codes) is not feasible within the scope of this work, as it would require a separate computational study. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct validation of the parameterized cooling rate through comparison with dedicated plasma kinetic simulations

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

IGMF constraint obtained by joint fit of ad-hoc instability scale and B-field to same spectral data

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"We find that plasma instabilities with a characteristic length scale of order 10^{2} kpc reproduce the observed photon spectrum and imply an IGMF strength of order 10^{-17} G."

The instability length scale is a free parameter in the ad-hoc cooling model; both it and the IGMF strength are varied together to match the identical 1ES 0229+200 spectrum. The 'implied' IGMF value is therefore the fitted parameter itself, not an independent constraint.

full rationale

The paper introduces a parameterized cooling term for plasma instabilities inside CRPropa and performs a fit to the Fermi-LAT spectrum of 1ES 0229+200, simultaneously varying the instability characteristic length and IGMF strength (plus observer FOV). The reported IGMF value of order 10^{-17} G is therefore the direct numerical output of that optimization rather than an independent prediction derived from plasma kinetics or cascade physics. This constitutes partial circularity of the 'fitted input called prediction' type; the central claim reduces to the fit result by construction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling are present in the text, so the score remains moderate rather than maximal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on two fitted parameters (instability length scale and IGMF strength) and the assumption that the parameterized cooling term correctly represents plasma instability physics.

free parameters (2)

characteristic length scale of plasma instability
Introduced as a free parameter in the model and fitted to reproduce the observed spectrum.
IGMF strength
Treated as a free parameter whose value is determined by the best-fit to Fermi-LAT data.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Plasma instabilities cool electron-positron pairs on a characteristic length scale before they undergo inverse Compton scattering
Core modeling assumption invoked to modify the cascade spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1421 out tokens · 58363 ms · 2026-05-10T18:01:14.194066+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We define a two-parameter energy-loss term ... E^{-1}_e dE_e/dt = c λ_0^{-1} (E_e / Ẽ_e)^{-α} sec^{-1}. We perform a parametric analysis using two parameters, the instability length scale, λ_0, and the power-law index, α
Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

plasma instabilities with a characteristic length scale of order 10^2 kpc reproduce the observed photon spectrum and imply an IGMF strength of order 10^{-17} G

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

M. G. Hauser, E. Dwek, The cosmic infrared background: measurements and implications, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys. 39 (2001) 249–307.doi:10.1146/annurev.as tro.39.1.249

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.as 2001
[3]

R. J. Gould, G. P. Schréder, Opacity of the universe to high-energy photons, Phys. Rev. 155 (5) (1967) 1408.do i:10.1103/PhysRev.155.1408

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.155.1408 1967
[4]

G. R. Blumenthal, R. J. Gould, Bremsstrahlung, syn- chrotron radiation, and compton scattering of high-energy electrons traversing dilute gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42 (2) (1970) 237.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.237

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.42.237 1970
[5]

F. A. Aharonian, P. S. Coppi, H. J. V oelk, Very high- energy gamma-rays from AGN: Cascading on the cos- mic background radiation fields and the formation of pair halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 423 (1994) L5–L8.arXiv: astro-ph/9312045,doi:10.1086/187222

work page doi:10.1086/187222 1994
[6]

Berezinsky, O

V . Berezinsky, O. Kalashev, High energy electromagnetic cascades in extragalactic space: physics and features, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2) (2016) 023007.arXiv:1603.03989, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023007. 15

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023007 2016
[7]

Heiter, D

C. Heiter, D. Kuempel, D. Walz, M. Erdmann, Produc- tion and propagation of ultra-high energy photons using CRPropa 3, Astropart. Phys. 102 (2018) 39–50.arXiv: 1710.11406,doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2018 .05.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2018 2018
[9]

Hofmann, The High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) project, AIP Conf

W. Hofmann, The High Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) project, AIP Conf. Proc. 515 (1) (2000) 500. doi:10.1063/1.1291416

work page doi:10.1063/1.1291416 2000
[10]

Rico, Review of fundamental physics results with the MAGIC telescopes, AIP Conf

J. Rico, Review of fundamental physics results with the MAGIC telescopes, AIP Conf. Proc. 1792 (1) (2017) 060001.doi:10.1063/1.4968984

work page doi:10.1063/1.4968984 2017
[11]

T. C. Weekes, et al., VERITAS: The Very energetic ra- diation imaging telescope array system, Astropart. Phys. 17 (2002) 221–243.arXiv:astro- ph/0108478, doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(01)00152-9

work page doi:10.1016/s0927-6505(01)00152-9 2002
[12]

F. A. Aharonian, TeV blazars and cosmic infrared back- ground radiation, in: 27th International Cosmic Ray Con- ference, 2001, pp. 250–261.doi:10.48550/arXiv.ast ro-ph/0112314

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.ast 2001
[13]

Neronov, D

A. Neronov, D. V . Semikoz, A method of measurement of extragalactic magnetic fields by TeV gamma ray tele- scopes, JETP Lett. 85 (2007) 473–477.arXiv:astro-p h/0604607,doi:10.1134/S0021364007100013

work page doi:10.1134/s0021364007100013 2007
[14]

Neronov, D

A. Neronov, D. V . Semikoz, Sensitivity of gamma-ray telescopes for detection of magnetic fields in intergalac- tic medium, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123012.arXiv: 0910.1920,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123012

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.123012 2009
[15]

Neronov, I

A. Neronov, I. V ovk, Evidence for strong extragalactic magnetic fields from Fermi observations of TeV blazars, Science 328 (2010) 73–75.arXiv:1006.3504,doi: 10.1126/science.1184192

work page doi:10.1126/science.1184192 2010
[16]

A. M. Taylor, I. V ovk, A. Neronov, Extragalactic magnetic fields constraints from simultaneous GeV-TeV observa- tions of blazars, Astron. Astrophys. 529 (2011) A144. arXiv:1101.0932,doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/20 1116441

work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2011
[17]

V ovk, A

I. V ovk, A. M. Taylor, D. Semikoz, A. Neronov, Fermi/LAT observations of 1ES 0229+200: implications for extragalactic magnetic fields and background light, Astrophys. J. Lett. 747 (2012) L14.arXiv:1112.2534, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/L14

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/l14 2012
[18]

Ackermann, et al., The Search for Spatial Extension in High-latitude Sources Detected by theFermiLarge Area Telescope, Astrophys

M. Ackermann, et al., The Search for Spatial Extension in High-latitude Sources Detected by theFermiLarge Area Telescope, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 237 (2) (2018) 32.arXi v:1804.08035,doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacdf7

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacdf7 2018
[19]

V . A. Acciari, et al., A lower bound on intergalactic mag- netic fields from time variability of 1ES 0229+200 from MAGIC and Fermi/LAT observations, Astron. Astrophys. 670 (2023) A145.arXiv:2210.03321,doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/202244126

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Aharonian, et al., Constraints on the Intergalactic Mag- netic Field Using Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S

F. Aharonian, et al., Constraints on the Intergalactic Mag- netic Field Using Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. Blazar Obser- vations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 950 (2) (2023) L16.arXiv: 2306.05132,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd777

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acd777 2023
[21]

V ovk, A

I. V ovk, A. Korochkin, A. Neronov, D. Semikoz, Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field from Fermi/LAT observations of the ‘pair echo’ of GRB 221009A, Astron. Astrophys. 683 (2024) A25.arXiv: 2306.07672,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347310

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347310 2024
[22]

Blunier, A

J. Blunier, A. Neronov, D. Semikoz, Revision of conser- vative lower bound on intergalactic magnetic field from Fermi and Cherenkov telescope observations of extreme blazars (6 2025).arXiv:2506.22285

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

V ovk, Intergalactic magnetic field lower limits up to the redshiftz≈3 (12 2025).arXiv:2512.11397

I. V ovk, Intergalactic magnetic field lower limits up to the redshiftz≈3 (12 2025).arXiv:2512.11397

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

A. E. Broderick, P. Chang, C. Pfrommer, The Cosmolog- ical Impact of Luminous TeV Blazars I: Implications of Plasma Instabilities for the Intergalactic Magnetic Field and Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background, Astrophys. J. 752 (2012) 22.arXiv:1106.5494,doi:10.1088/0004 -637X/752/1/22

work page doi:10.1088/0004 2012
[25]

Miniati, A

F. Miniati, A. Elyiv, Relaxation of Blazar Induced Pair Beams in Cosmic V oids: Measurement of Magnetic Field in V oids and Thermal History of the IGM, Astrophys. J. 770 (2013) 54.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/54

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/54 2013
[26]

Schlickeiser, D

R. Schlickeiser, D. Ibscher, M. Supsar, Plasma effects on fast pair beams in cosmic voids, Astrophys. J. 758 (2) (2012) 102.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/102

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/102 2012
[27]

Schlickeiser, S

R. Schlickeiser, S. Krakau, M. Supsar, Plasma effects on fast pair beams. ii. reactive versus kinetic instability of parallel electrostatic waves, Astrophys. J. 777 (1) (2013) 49.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/49

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/49 2013
[28]

Sironi, D

L. Sironi, D. Giannios, Relativistic Pair Beams from TeV Blazars: A Source of Reprocessed GeV Emission rather than Intergalactic Heating, Astrophys. J. 787 (2014) 49. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/49

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/787/1/49 2014
[29]

Vafin, I

S. Vafin, I. Rafighi, M. Pohl, J. Niemiec, The electrostatic instability for realistic pair distributions in blazar/EBL cascades, Astrophys. J. 857 (1) (2018) 43.arXiv: 1803.02990,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab552

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab552 2018
[30]

Alves Batista, A

R. Alves Batista, A. Saveliev, E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, The Impact of Plasma Instabilities on the Spectra of TeV Blazars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489 (3) (2019) 3836–3849.arXiv:1904.13345,doi:10.1093/mn ras/stz2389. 16

work page doi:10.1093/mn 2019
[31]

Alawashra, M

M. Alawashra, M. Pohl, Nonlinear Feedback of the Elec- trostatic Instability on the Blazar-induced Pair Beam and GeV Cascade, Astrophys. J. 964 (1) (2024) 82.arXiv: 2402.03127,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad24ea

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad24ea 2024
[32]

Saveliev, C

A. Saveliev, C. Evoli, G. Sigl, The Role of Plasma Insta- bilities in the Propagation of Gamma-Rays from Distant Blazars (11 2013).arXiv:1311.6752

work page arXiv 2013
[33]

S. Dey, G. Sigl, Simulations of astrophysically relevant pair beam instabilities in a laboratory context, Astropart. Phys. 173 (2025) 103153.arXiv:2501.14518,doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2025.103153

work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2025.103153 2025
[34]

, archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

F. Tavecchio, G. Ghisellini, G. Bonnoli, L. Foschini, Ex- treme TeV blazars and the intergalactic magnetic field, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 414 (2011) 3566.arXiv: 1009.1048,doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.186 57.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.186 2011
[35]

C. D. Dermer, M. Cavadini, S. Razzaque, J. D. Finke, J. Chiang, B. Lott, Time Delay of Cascade Radiation for TeV Blazars and the Measurement of the Intergalactic Magnetic Field, Astrophys. J. Lett. 733 (2011) L21.arXi v:1011.6660,doi:10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L21

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/l21 2011
[36]

B., Abdo, A

W. Atwood, A. Abdo, M. Ackermann, et al., The large area telescope on the fermi gamma-ray space telescope mission, The Astrophysical Journal 697 (2) (2009) 1071. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 2009
[37]

Aleksic, et al., Search for an extended VHE gamma-ray emission from Mrk 421 and Mrk 501 with the MAGIC Telescope, Astron

J. Aleksic, et al., Search for an extended VHE gamma-ray emission from Mrk 421 and Mrk 501 with the MAGIC Telescope, Astron. Astrophys. 524 (2010) A77.arXiv: 1004.1093,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014747

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014747 2010
[38]

Abramowski, et al., Search for Extended\gamma-ray Emission around AGN with H.E.S.S

A. Abramowski, et al., Search for Extended\gamma-ray Emission around AGN with H.E.S.S. and Fermi-LAT, As- tron. Astrophys. 562 (2014) A145.arXiv:1401.2915, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322510

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322510 2014
[39]

Burmeister, P

L. Burmeister, P. Da Vela, F. Longo, G. Marti-Devesa, M. Meyer, F. G. Saturni, A. Stamerra, P. Veres, Con- straints on the intergalactic magnetic field from Fermi- LAT observations of GRB 221009A, Phys. Rev. D 113 (4) (2026) 043041.arXiv:2512.11128,doi:10.1103/g8 rr-g7p4

work page doi:10.1103/g8 2026
[40]

M. S. Webar, Y . Abed, D. Horns, Discovery of femto Gauss intergalactic magnetic fields towards Mkn 501 (9 2025).arXiv:2509.11996

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Alves Batista, et al., CRPropa 3.2 — an advanced framework for high-energy particle propagation in extra- galactic and galactic spaces, JCAP 2022 (09) (2022) 035

R. Alves Batista, et al., CRPropa 3.2 — an advanced framework for high-energy particle propagation in extra- galactic and galactic spaces, JCAP 2022 (09) (2022) 035. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/035

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/035 2022
[42]

A. Bret, L. Gremillet, M. Dieckmann, Multidimen- sional electron beam-plasma instabilities in the relativis- tic regime, Physics of Plasmas 17 (12) (2010) 120501. doi:10.1063/1.3514586

work page doi:10.1063/1.3514586 2010
[43]

Bret, Weibel, Two-Stream, Filamentation, Oblique, Bell, Buneman

A. Bret, Weibel, Two-Stream, Filamentation, Oblique, Bell, Buneman... which one grows faster ?, Astrophys. J. 699 (2009) 990–1003.arXiv:0903.2658,doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/990

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/990 2009
[44]

A. A. Penzias, R. W. Wilson, A Measurement of ex- cess antenna temperature at 4080-Mc/s, Astrophys. J. 142 (1965) 419–421.doi:10.1086/148307

work page doi:10.1086/148307 1965
[45]

L. E. E. Castro, S. Rossoni, G. Sigl, Influence of plasma instabilities on the propagation of electromagnetic cas- cades from distant blazars (2024).arXiv:2405.15390, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.15390

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15390 2024
[46]

Alawashra, M

M. Alawashra, M. Pohl, Suppression of the TeV Pair- beam–Plasma Instability by a Tangled Weak Intergalactic Magnetic Field, Astrophys. J. 929 (1) (2022) 67.arXiv: 2203.01022,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4b

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4b 2022
[47]

R. A. Fisher, Dispersion on a sphere, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 217 (1130) (1953) 295–305.doi:10.1098/rs pa.1953.0064

work page doi:10.1098/rs 1953
[48]

Jasche, A

J. Jasche, A. van Vliet, J. P. Rachen, Targeting Earth: CR- Propa learns to aim, PoS ICRC2019 (2020) 447.arXiv: 1911.05048,doi:10.22323/1.358.0447

work page doi:10.22323/1.358.0447 2020
[49]

Franceschini, G

A. Franceschini, G. Rodighiero, M. Vaccari, Extragalac- tic optical-infrared background radiation, its time evolu- tion and the cosmic photon-photon opacity, A&A 487 (3) (2008) 837–852.doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20080969 1

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20080969 2008
[50]

Dundovi ´c, G

A. Dundovi ´c, G. Sigl, Anisotropies of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays Dominated by a Single Source in the Pres- ence of Deflections, JCAP 2019 (01) (2019) 018.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/018

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/018 2019
[51]

Schlickeiser, A

R. Schlickeiser, A. Elyiv, D. Ibscher, F. Miniati, The pair beam production spectrum from photon-photon an- nihilation in cosmic voids, Astrophys. J. 758 (2012) 101. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/101

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/101 2012
[52]

Perry, Y

R. Perry, Y . Lyubarsky, The role of resonant plasma in- stabilities in the evolution of blazar induced pair beams, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (2) (2021) 2215–2228. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab324

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab324 2021
[53]

T. M. Kneiske, T. Bretz, K. Mannheim, D. H. Hartmann, Implications of cosmological gamma-ray absorption. 2. Modification of gamma-ray spectra, Astron. Astrophys. 413 (2004) 807–815.arXiv:astro- ph/0309141, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031542

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031542 2004
[54]

2013, ArXiv e-prints

W. Atwood, et al. (3 2013).arXiv:1303.3514

work page arXiv 2013
[55]

Alves Batista, A

R. Alves Batista, A. Saveliev, The Gamma-ray Window to Intergalactic Magnetism, Universe 7 (7) (2021) 223.doi: 10.3390/universe7070223. 17

work page doi:10.3390/universe7070223 2021
[56]

Aharonian, et al., New constraints on the Mid-IR EBL from the HESS discovery of VHE gamma rays from 1ES 0229+200, Astron

F. Aharonian, et al., New constraints on the Mid-IR EBL from the HESS discovery of VHE gamma rays from 1ES 0229+200, Astron. Astrophys. 475 (2007) L9–L13.arXi v:0709.4584,doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078462

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078462 2007
[57]

Aliu, et al., A three-year multi-wavelength study of the very-high-energyγ-ray blazar 1ES 0229+200, Astrophys

E. Aliu, et al., A three-year multi-wavelength study of the very-high-energyγ-ray blazar 1ES 0229+200, Astrophys. J. 782 (1) (2014) 13.arXiv:1312.6592,doi:10.108 8/0004-637X/782/1/13

work page arXiv 2014
[58]

Spin-down Evolution and Radio Disappearance of the Magnetar PSR J1622-4950.apj2017,841, 126

A. Korochkin, O. Kalashev, A. Neronov, D. Semikoz, Sensitivity reach of gamma-ray measurements for strong cosmological magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. 906 (2) (2021) 116.arXiv:2007.14331,doi:10.3847/15 38-4357/abc697

work page doi:10.3847/15 2021
[59]

Neronov, D

A. Neronov, D. Semikoz, O. Kalashev, Limit on the in- tergalactic magnetic field from the ultrahigh-energy cos- mic ray hotspot in the Perseus-Pisces region, Phys. Rev. D 108 (10) (2023) 103008.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1 08.103008

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.1 2023
[60]

Tinto and J

R. Banerjee, K. Jedamzik, The Evolution of cosmic mag- netic fields: From the very early universe, to recombi- nation, to the present, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 123003. arXiv:astro-ph/0410032,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD .70.123003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2004
[61]

A. A. Abdo, et al., Fermi observations of TeV-selected AGN, Astrophys. J. 707 (2009) 1310–1333.arXiv:0910 .4881,doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1310

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/707/2/1310 2009
[62]

Farrell, Veritas observations of the blazar h 1426+428, Ph.D

K. Farrell, Veritas observations of the blazar h 1426+428, Ph.D. thesis, University College Dublin (2022)

2022
[63]

Grasso, H

D. Grasso, H. R. Rubinstein, Magnetic fields in the early universe, Phys. Rept. 348 (2001) 163–266.arXiv:astr o-ph/0009061,doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)001 10-1

work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)001 2001
[64]

Durrer, A

R. Durrer, A. Neronov, Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation, Astron. As- trophys. Rev. 21 (2013) 62.arXiv:1303.7121,doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7

work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 2013
[65]

Alawashra, Y

M. Alawashra, Y . Yang, C. M. Hirata, H. Long, M. Pohl, MeV Cosmic-Ray Electrons Modify the TeV Pair-beam Plasma Instability, Astrophys. J. 989 (1) (2025) 37.arXi v:2507.02423,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adec9e. 18

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adec9e 2025