pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08522 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

UniversalVTG: A Universal and Lightweight Foundation Model for Video Temporal Grounding

Joungbin An , Agrim Jain , Kristen Grauman
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords video temporal groundinguniversal modelcross-dataset pretrainingquery unificationlightweight foundation modelmultimodal groundinglong video understandingtemporal localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single lightweight model for video temporal grounding outperforms specialized models across many datasets and matches much larger approaches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that video temporal grounding can be solved with one model rather than separate ones for each dataset and query style. Large-scale pretraining across datasets is combined with an offline step that turns varied query formats into one common space, which avoids the performance loss seen when data is mixed without this step. The resulting compact model reaches top accuracy on benchmarks including Ego4D and ActivityNet while scaling to long videos and using far less compute than multimodal language model alternatives.

Core claim

UniversalVTG is a single VTG model trained with large-scale cross-dataset pretraining. An offline Query Unifier canonicalizes heterogeneous query formats into a shared declarative space, reducing linguistic mismatch and preventing negative transfer observed under naive joint training. Combined with an efficient grounding head, UniversalVTG scales to long untrimmed videos. One checkpoint achieves state-of-the-art performance versus dedicated VTG models on GoalStep-StepGrounding, Ego4D-NLQ, TACoS, Charades-STA, and ActivityNet-Captions, and matches or exceeds accuracy of recent MLLM-based approaches despite being over 100 times smaller.

What carries the argument

The offline Query Unifier that converts heterogeneous query formats into a shared declarative space, paired with an efficient grounding head that enables scaling to long videos.

If this is right

  • One trained checkpoint delivers strong results on GoalStep-StepGrounding, Ego4D-NLQ, TACoS, Charades-STA, and ActivityNet-Captions without needing separate models per dataset.
  • The model handles long untrimmed videos without the context limits that affect larger language-model methods.
  • Negative transfer from naive joint training on multiple datasets is avoided through query standardization.
  • It supplies a low-compute alternative to parameter-heavy multimodal language model methods for the same grounding task.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same query standardization step could help other multimodal tasks that currently suffer when datasets use incompatible input formats.
  • Input normalization may prove more critical than increasing model size for achieving reliable cross-domain performance in temporal grounding.
  • The compact size opens the door to running accurate video moment search directly on phones or edge devices.

Load-bearing premise

Converting different query formats into one shared space preserves all information needed for accurate moment localization without introducing errors.

What would settle it

Remove the Query Unifier, retrain on the same mixed datasets, and check whether accuracy falls on benchmarks that contain varied query styles compared to the full model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08522 by Agrim Jain, Joungbin An, Kristen Grauman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Universal without compromise: a single UniversalVTG checkpoint rivals dataset-specific SOTA. Abstract. Video temporal grounding (VTG) is typically tackled with dataset-specific models that transfer poorly across domains and query styles. Recent efforts to overcome this limitation have adapted large multimodal language models (MLLMs) to VTG, but their high compute cost and limited video context still hinder… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: UniversalVTG Framework. A single, lightweight model generalizes across heterogeneous video domains and query styles. (Left) Diverse videos are mapped to a Shared Representation via an efficient backbone, while a Query Unifier canonicalizes multi-style text inputs into a Unified Semantic Space. (Right) With both modalities standardized, one grounding head localizes events across varied viewpoints (ego/exo),… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cross-Dataset Performance vs. Param￾eter Scale. UniversalVTG achieves perfor￾mance parity with 100× larger MLLMs while outperforming specialized expert models. 4.2 Cross-Dataset Training: Diagnosing and Mitigating Negative Transfer Adopting a shared visual encoder projects videos from heterogeneous bench￾marks into a common feature space. To study whether a single VTG model can generalize across diverse gr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Video temporal grounding (VTG) is typically tackled with dataset-specific models that transfer poorly across domains and query styles. Recent efforts to overcome this limitation have adapted large multimodal language models (MLLMs) to VTG, but their high compute cost and limited video context still hinder long-video grounding. We instead scale unified supervision while keeping the model lightweight. We present UniversalVTG, a single VTG model trained with large-scale cross-dataset pretraining. An offline Query Unifier canonicalizes heterogeneous query formats into a shared declarative space, reducing linguistic mismatch and preventing the negative transfer observed under na\"ive joint training. Combined with an efficient grounding head, UniversalVTG scales to long, untrimmed videos. Across diverse benchmarks-GoalStep-StepGrounding, Ego4D-NLQ, TACoS, Charades-STA, and ActivityNet-Captions-one UniversalVTG checkpoint achieves state-of-the-art performance versus dedicated VTG models. Moreover, despite being $>100\times$ smaller than recent MLLM-based approaches, UniversalVTG matches or exceeds their accuracy on multiple benchmarks, offering a practical alternative to parameter-heavy MLLMs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UniversalVTG, a single lightweight model for video temporal grounding (VTG) trained via large-scale cross-dataset pretraining. It employs an offline Query Unifier to canonicalize heterogeneous query formats into a shared declarative space and pairs this with an efficient grounding head to handle long untrimmed videos. The central claim is that one UniversalVTG checkpoint achieves state-of-the-art results against dedicated VTG models on GoalStep-StepGrounding, Ego4D-NLQ, TACoS, Charades-STA, and ActivityNet-Captions while matching or exceeding the accuracy of MLLM-based approaches that are >100× larger.

Significance. If the empirical claims are substantiated with full results, ablations, and training details, the work would be significant for demonstrating that unified supervision plus query canonicalization can yield a practical, parameter-efficient foundation model for VTG. This would offer a scalable alternative to heavy MLLMs and reduce negative transfer across query styles and domains, with potential impact on long-video understanding applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts SOTA performance and parity with much larger MLLMs across five benchmarks, yet provides no quantitative metrics, tables, error bars, ablation studies, or training hyperparameters. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be evaluated and the soundness assessment remains low.
  2. [Abstract] Query Unifier description (inferred from abstract): the assumption that an offline canonicalizer reduces linguistic mismatch without introducing information loss or errors that degrade grounding accuracy is load-bearing for the no-negative-transfer claim, but no ablation isolating its contribution or error analysis on query reformulation is referenced.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'large-scale cross-dataset pretraining' without specifying the datasets, sampling strategy, or loss weighting used to combine them.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the grounding head and its efficiency claims (e.g., how it scales to long videos) would benefit from a brief equation or complexity statement even in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The comments highlight opportunities to make the abstract more self-contained and to strengthen the empirical support for the Query Unifier. We address each point below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript asserts SOTA performance and parity with much larger MLLMs across five benchmarks, yet provides no quantitative metrics, tables, error bars, ablation studies, or training hyperparameters. Without these, the central empirical claim cannot be evaluated and the soundness assessment remains low.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should include key quantitative highlights so that the central claims can be assessed without immediately consulting the full text. The manuscript body already contains the requested elements: Table 1 reports mIoU and R@1 scores with standard deviations across all five benchmarks, Tables 2-3 present comparisons to dedicated VTG models and MLLM baselines (including parameter counts showing the >100× size reduction), Section 4.3 contains ablations, figures include error bars, and hyperparameters plus training details appear in Appendix A. We will revise the abstract to insert concise performance numbers (e.g., average mIoU gains and model-size comparison) while preserving its length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Query Unifier description (inferred from abstract): the assumption that an offline canonicalizer reduces linguistic mismatch without introducing information loss or errors that degrade grounding accuracy is load-bearing for the no-negative-transfer claim, but no ablation isolating its contribution or error analysis on query reformulation is referenced.

    Authors: The Query Unifier is indeed central to avoiding negative transfer. Section 3.2 describes its offline operation and Section 4.2 reports the performance difference between naïve joint training and training with the Unifier, which supports the claim of reduced negative transfer. However, we did not provide an isolated ablation that removes only the Unifier while keeping all other components fixed, nor a quantitative error analysis of the reformulation step (e.g., semantic fidelity metrics on a held-out query set). We will add both: a dedicated ablation table isolating the Unifier’s contribution and a short error analysis subsection reporting reformulation accuracy and downstream impact on grounding metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical claims rest on external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical architecture (offline Query Unifier + lightweight grounding head + cross-dataset pretraining) whose central claims are validated through independent benchmark evaluations on GoalStep-StepGrounding, Ego4D-NLQ, TACoS, Charades-STA, and ActivityNet-Captions. No mathematical derivation chain, fitted-parameter predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps are present in the provided text. The performance assertions are falsifiable against held-out datasets and external models rather than reducing to internal definitions or ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Query Unifier successfully reducing linguistic mismatch and on cross-dataset pretraining yielding positive transfer; both are domain assumptions without independent verification in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Heterogeneous query formats can be canonicalized into a shared declarative space without significant information loss
    This premise is invoked to explain why unified supervision avoids negative transfer.
invented entities (2)
  • Query Unifier no independent evidence
    purpose: Canonicalizes heterogeneous query formats into a shared declarative space
    New component introduced to address linguistic mismatch in joint training.
  • Efficient grounding head no independent evidence
    purpose: Enables scaling to long untrimmed videos while remaining lightweight
    Part of the model design for practical long-video handling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1349 out tokens · 39590 ms · 2026-05-10T17:52:49.381392+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23043 (2025)

    An, J., Grauman, K.: Hieramamba: Video temporal grounding via hierarchical anchor-mamba pooling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.23043 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    In: ICCV

    Anne Hendricks, L., Wang, O., Shechtman, E., Sivic, J., Darrell, T., Russell, B.: Localizing moments in video with natural language. In: ICCV. pp. 5803–5812 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al.: Qwen3-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Bertasius, G., Wang, H., Torresani, L.: Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In: ICML. vol. 2, p. 4 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network

    Bolya, D., Huang, P.Y., Sun, P., Cho, J.H., Madotto, A., Wei, C., Ma, T., Zhi, J., Rajasegaran, J., Rasheed, H., et al.: Perception encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13181 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    In: ECCV (2020)

    Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., Zagoruyko, S.: End-to-end object detection with transformers. In: ECCV (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Timemarker: A versatile video-llm for long and short video understanding with superior temporal localization ability

    Chen, S., Lan, X., Yuan, Y., Jie, Z., Ma, L.: Timemarker: A versatile video-llm for long and short video understanding with superior temporal localization ability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18211 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Chen, Z., Jiang, X., Xu, X., Cao, Z., Mo, Y., Shen, H.T.: Joint searching and grounding: Multi-granularity video content retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. pp. 975–983 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Molmo2: Open weights and data for vision-language models with video understanding and grounding, 2026

    Clark, C., Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Park, J.S., Salehi, M., Tripathi, R., Lee, S., Ren, Z., Kim, C.D., Yang, Y., et al.: Molmo2: Open weights and data for vision-language models with video understanding and grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10611 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    In: ICCV

    Feichtenhofer, C., Fan, H., Malik, J., He, K.: Slowfast networks for video recognition. In: ICCV. pp. 6202–6211 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    In: CVPR

    Feng, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, M., Guan, W., Nie, L.: Object-shot enhanced grounding network for egocentric video. In: CVPR. pp. 24190–24200 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    In: ICCV

    Gao, J., Sun, C., Yang, Z., Nevatia, R.: Tall: Temporal activity localization via language query. In: ICCV. pp. 5267–5275 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02755 (2019)

    Ghosh,S.,Agarwal,A.,Parekh,Z.,Hauptmann,A.:Excl:Extractivecliplocalization using natural language descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02755 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1904

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01615 (2024)

    Gordeev, A., Dokholyan, V., Tolstykh, I., Kuprashevich, M.: Saliency-guided detr for moment retrieval and highlight detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01615 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al.: The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    In: CVPR

    Grauman, K., Westbury, A., Byrne, E., Chavis, Z., Furnari, A., Girdhar, R., Hamburger, J., Jiang, H., Liu, M., Liu, X., et al.: Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In: CVPR. pp. 18995–19012 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    In: AAAI (2025)

    Guo, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Cheng, D., Tang, X., Sui, D., Liu, Q., Chen, X., Zhao, K.: Vtg-llm: Integrating timestamp knowledge into video llms for enhanced video temporal grounding. In: AAAI (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    In: ECCV

    Hannan, T., Islam, M.M., Seidl, T., Bertasius, G.: Rgnet: A unified clip retrieval and grounding network for long videos. In: ECCV. pp. 352–369. Springer (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Cone: An efficient coarse-to-fine alignment frame- work for long video temporal grounding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10918, 2022

    Hou, Z., Zhong, W., Ji, L., Gao, D., Yan, K., Chan, W.K., Ngo, C.W., Shou, Z., Duan, N.: Cone: An efficient coarse-to-fine alignment framework for long video temporal grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10918 (2022) 16 J. An et al

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Huang, B., Wang, X., Chen, H., Song, Z., Zhu, W.: Vtimellm: Empower llm to grasp video moments. In: CVPR (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    In: ECCV (2024)

    Huang, D.A., Liao, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Yin, H., Molchanov, P., Yu, Z., Kautz, J.: Lita: Language instructed temporal-localization assistant. In: ECCV (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    In: ICCV (2023)

    Jang,J.,Park,J., Kim,J.,Kwon,H.,Sohn,K.:Knowingwheretofocus:Event-aware transformer for video grounding. In: ICCV (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision

    Krishna, R., Hata, K., Ren, F., Fei-Fei, L., Carlos Niebles, J.: Dense-captioning events in videos. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. pp. 706–715 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    In: ECCV

    Lee, P., Byun, H.: Bam-detr: Boundary-aligned moment detection transformer for temporal sentence grounding in videos. In: ECCV. pp. 220–238. Springer (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    NeurIPS34, 11846–11858 (2021)

    Lei, J., Berg, T.L., Bansal, M.: Detecting moments and highlights in videos via natural language queries. NeurIPS34, 11846–11858 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18883 (2025)

    Li, Z., Di, S., Zhai, Z., Huang, W., Wang, Y., Xie, W.: Universal video temporal grounding with generative multi-modal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18883 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    NeurIPS35, 7575–7586 (2022)

    Lin, K.Q., Wang, J., Soldan, M., Wray, M., Yan, R., Xu, E.Z., Gao, D., Tu, R.C., Zhao, W., Kong, W., et al.: Egocentric video-language pretraining. NeurIPS35, 7575–7586 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    In: ICCV (2023)

    Lin, K.Q., Zhang, P., Chen, J., Pramanick, S., Gao, D., Wang, A.J., Yan, R., Shou, M.Z.: Univtg: Towards unified video-language temporal grounding. In: ICCV (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    In: ICCV

    Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Dollár, P.: Focal loss for dense object detection. In: ICCV. pp. 2980–2988 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    In: CVPR

    Lu, Z., Iftekhar, A., Mittal, G., Meng, T., Wang, X., Zhao, C., Kukkala, R., Elhamifar, E., Chen, M.: Decafnet: Delegate and conquer for efficient temporal grounding in long videos. In: CVPR. pp. 24066–24076 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Chrono: A simple blueprint for representing time in mllms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18113, 2024

    Meinardus, B., Batra, A., Rohrbach, A., Rohrbach, M.: The surprising effectiveness of multimodal large language models for video moment retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18113 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08835 (2023)

    Moon, W., Hyun, S., Lee, S., Heo, J.P.: Correlation-guided query-dependency calibration for video temporal grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08835 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    In: CVPR (2023)

    Moon, W., Hyun, S., Park, S., Park, D., Heo, J.P.: Query-dependent video repre- sentation for moment retrieval and highlight detection. In: CVPR (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    In: CVPR

    Mu, F., Mo, S., Li, Y.: Snag: Scalable and accurate video grounding. In: CVPR. pp. 18930–18940 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    In: CVPR

    Mun, J., Cho, M., Han, B.: Local-global video-text interactions for temporal grounding. In: CVPR. pp. 10810–10819 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    In: ICCV

    Pan, Y., He, X., Gong, B., Lv, Y., Shen, Y., Peng, Y., Zhao, D.: Scanning only once: An end-to-end framework for fast temporal grounding in long videos. In: ICCV. pp. 13767–13777 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Pramanick, S., Mavroudi, E., Song, Y., Chellappa, R., Torresani, L., Afouras, T.: Enrich and detect: Video temporal grounding with multimodal llms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 24297–24308 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Momentor: Ad- vancing video large language model with fine-grained temporal reasoning,

    Qian, L., Li, J., Wu, Y., Ye, Y., Fei, H., Chua, T.S., Zhuang, Y., Tang, S.: Momentor: Advancing video large language model with fine-grained temporal reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11435 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 8748–8763. PmLR (2021) UniversalVTG 17

    2021

  40. [40]

    In: CVPR

    Ramakrishnan, S.K., Al-Halah, Z., Grauman, K.: Naq: Leveraging narrations as queries to supervise episodic memory. In: CVPR. pp. 6694–6703 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    In: ICML

    Ramakrishnan, S.K., Al-Halah, Z., Grauman, K.: Spotem: Efficient video search for episodic memory. In: ICML. pp. 28618–28636. PMLR (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics1, 25–36 (2013)

    Regneri,M.,Rohrbach,M.,Wetzel,D.,Thater,S.,Schiele,B.,Pinkal,M.:Grounding action descriptions in videos. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics1, 25–36 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Ren, S., Yao, L., Li, S., Sun, X., Hou, L.: Timechat: A time-sensitive multimodal large language model for long video understanding. In: CVPR (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    In: European conference on computer vision

    Sigurdsson, G.A., Varol, G., Wang, X., Farhadi, A., Laptev, I., Gupta, A.: Hollywood in homes: Crowdsourcing data collection for activity understanding. In: European conference on computer vision. pp. 510–526. Springer (2016)

    2016

  45. [45]

    OpenAI GPT-5 System Card

    Singh, A., Fry, A., Perelman, A., Tart, A., Ganesh, A., El-Kishky, A., McLaughlin, A., Low, A., Ostrow, A., Ananthram, A., et al.: Openai gpt-5 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    In: ICCV

    Soldan, M., Xu, M., Qu, S., Tegner, J., Ghanem, B.: Vlg-net: Video-language graph matching network for video grounding. In: ICCV. pp. 3224–3234 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    NeurIPS36, 38863–38886 (2023)

    Song, Y., Byrne, E., Nagarajan, T., Wang, H., Martin, M., Torresani, L.: Ego4d goal-step: Toward hierarchical understanding of procedural activities. NeurIPS36, 38863–38886 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    In: CVPR

    Tang, Y., Ding, D., Rao, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, D., Zhao, L., Lu, J., Zhou, J.: Coin: A large-scale dataset for comprehensive instructional video analysis. In: CVPR. pp. 1207–1216 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    In: ICCV

    Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L., Paluri, M.: Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks. In: ICCV. pp. 4489–4497 (2015)

    2015

  50. [50]

    In: CVPR

    Wang, H., Zha, Z.J., Li, L., Liu, D., Luo, J.: Structured multi-level interaction network for video moment localization via language query. In: CVPR. pp. 7026–7035 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

    Wang, P., Bai, S., Tan, S., Wang, S., Fan, Z., Bai, J., Chen, K., Liu, X., Wang, J., Ge, W., et al.: Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Internvideo: General video foundation models via generative and discriminative learning

    Wang, Y., Li, K., Li, Y., He, Y., Huang, B., Zhao, Z., Zhang, H., Xu, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., et al.: Internvideo: General video foundation models via generative and discriminative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03191 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos,

    Wang, Y., Meng, X., Liang, J., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Zhao, D.: Hawkeye: Training video-text llms for grounding text in videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10228 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Yan, S., Xiong, X., Nagrani, A., Arnab, A., Wang, Z., Ge, W., Ross, D., Schmid, C.: Unloc: A unified framework for video localization tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 13623–13633 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Qwen3 Technical Report

    Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., et al.: Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    NeurIPS32(2019)

    Yuan, Y., Ma, L., Wang, J., Liu, W., Zhu, W.: Semantic conditioned dynamic modulation for temporal sentence grounding in videos. NeurIPS32(2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    In: CVPR

    Zala, A., Cho, J., Kottur, S., Chen, X., Oguz, B., Mehdad, Y., Bansal, M.: Hier- archical video-moment retrieval and step-captioning. In: CVPR. pp. 23056–23065 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    In: CVPR

    Zeng, R., Xu, H., Huang, W., Chen, P., Tan, M., Gan, C.: Dense regression network for video grounding. In: CVPR. pp. 10287–10296 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    In: ICLR (2024) 18 J

    Zeng, X., Li, K., Wang, C., Li, X., Jiang, T., Yan, Z., Li, S., Shi, Y., Yue, Z., Wang, Y., et al.: Timesuite: Improving mllms for long video understanding via grounded tuning. In: ICLR (2024) 18 J. An et al

    2024

  60. [60]

    VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understanding

    Zhang, B., Li, K., Cheng, Z., Hu, Z., Yuan, Y., Chen, G., Leng, S., Jiang, Y., Zhang, H., Li, X., et al.: Videollama 3: Frontier multimodal foundation models for image and video understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13106 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    In: ECCV

    Zhang, C.L., Wu, J., Li, Y.: Actionformer: Localizing moments of actions with transformers. In: ECCV. pp. 492–510. Springer (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Span-based localizing network for natural language video localization,

    Zhang, H., Sun, A., Jing, W., Zhou, J.T.: Span-based localizing network for natural language video localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13931 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    In: AAAI

    Zhang, S., Peng, H., Fu, J., Luo, J.: Learning 2d temporal adjacent networks for moment localization with natural language. In: AAAI. vol. 34, pp. 12870–12877 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    In: AAAI

    Zheng, Z., Wang, P., Liu, W., Li, J., Ye, R., Ren, D.: Distance-iou loss: Faster and better learning for bounding box regression. In: AAAI. vol. 34, pp. 12993–13000 (2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    peel potatoes

    Zhou, L., Xu, C., Corso, J.: Towards automatic learning of procedures from web instructional videos. In: AAAI. vol. 32 (2018) Supplementary Material 19 A Analysis of the Unifier Module As introduced in Section 4.2 of the main paper, the Unifier module can be instantiated with any Large Language Model (LLM). Its primary role is to convert diverse incoming ...

    work page arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Preserves ALL semantic meaning, visual cues, objects, attributes, and agent information

  67. [67]

    Standardizes the style to a consistent format across all datasets

  68. [68]

    Unified Style Target

    Maintains the original perspective (first-person if original is first-person, third- person if original is third-person). Unified Style Target

  69. [69]

    Directly describe the event to locate (Subject-Verb- Object-Location), which is more natural for temporal matching than questions

    Format (Descriptive statement):All queries should be phrased as complete, descriptive statements. Directly describe the event to locate (Subject-Verb- Object-Location), which is more natural for temporal matching than questions

  70. [70]

    was", "put

    Tense (Past tense):Use past tense verbs (e.g., "was", "put", "took"). This indicates events that have already occurred and can be located temporally. 26 Supplementary Material 3.Perspective Preservation: –If original is first-person ("I", "my"):Keep first-person. –If original is third-person ("he", "the woman"):Keep third-person. –Do NOT convertbetween pe...

  71. [71]

    Capitalize the first letter and end with a period

    Completeness:Use complete, grammatically correct sentences. Capitalize the first letter and end with a period

  72. [72]

    I" →"I",

    Visual Grounding:All information must be purely visually deducible. Do NOT require reasoning about intentions, motivations, or external knowledge. Critical Preservation Rules –1. Agent/Subject:Preserve the original agent noun phrase exactly (e.g., "I" →"I", "a woman"→"a woman"). Agent identity is a strong visual cue. –2. Action/Verb:Preserve the main verb...

  73. [73]

    Identify elements:Agent, Action, Objects, Location, Attributes, Temporal relations

  74. [74]

    Preserve perspective:First-person stays first-person; third-person stays third-person

  75. [75]

    was", "had

    Convert to statement:Use specific event verbs. Avoid weak verbs ("was", "had") unless part of a compound event. 4.Convert to past tense:"is"→"was", "takes"→"took"

  76. [76]

    No explana- tions, no original sentences, no commentary

    Output Requirements:Provide ONLY the converted statement. No explana- tions, no original sentences, no commentary. A single, complete, grammatically correct sentence ending in a period. Supplementary Material 27 Query: peel potatoes 1s – 62s 0s – 64s GT Ours 24s – 30s 23s – 30s GT Ours Prediction: Query: person turn a light on Video Source: Goalstep Video...