arxiv: 2604.09058 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

PDE-regularized Dynamics-informed Diffusion with Uncertainty-aware Filtering for Long-Horizon Dynamics

Min Young Baeg , Yoon-Yeong Kim

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI

keywords PDE regularizationdiffusion modelslong-horizon forecastingUnscented Kalman Filterspatiotemporal predictionuncertainty quantificationdynamical systems

0 comments

The pith

PDYffusion adds PDE regularization and UKF filtering to diffusion models to stabilize long-horizon dynamical predictions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Long-horizon spatiotemporal forecasting often fails because errors accumulate and predictions drift from physical laws. The paper introduces PDYffusion, a diffusion framework whose interpolator applies a differential operator to enforce PDE-governed smoothness on intermediate states. Its forecaster then uses an unscented Kalman filter to track and manage uncertainty during repeated prediction steps. Theoretical arguments establish that the interpolator meets PDE smoothness conditions and that the forecaster converges under the given loss. Experiments on dynamical datasets report better CRPS and MSE scores alongside steady uncertainty measured by SSR.

Core claim

PDYffusion, a dynamics-informed diffusion framework, integrates a PDE-regularized interpolator that satisfies PDE-constrained smoothness properties with a UKF-based forecaster that converges under the proposed loss, producing more accurate long-horizon predictions on multiple dynamical datasets while keeping uncertainty estimates stable.

What carries the argument

The PDE-regularized interpolator that enforces physical consistency through a differential operator, paired with the UKF-based forecaster that explicitly models uncertainty to limit error growth in iterative steps.

If this is right

The interpolator satisfies PDE-constrained smoothness properties for generated states.
The forecaster converges under the proposed loss formulation.
Superior CRPS and MSE performance is achieved on multiple dynamical datasets.
Uncertainty behavior remains stable as measured by SSR.
A balanced trade-off between accuracy and uncertainty is provided for long-horizon tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach may require known governing PDEs, limiting use on systems where equations are only partially observed.
Testing on real sensor data with measurement noise would check whether the reported robustness holds outside simulated benchmarks.
The explicit uncertainty modeling could support downstream tasks such as risk-aware control or ensemble planning.

Load-bearing premise

That PDE regularization in the interpolator and UKF integration in the forecaster will reliably enforce physical consistency and stop error accumulation during long iterative predictions across varied dynamical systems.

What would settle it

A new dynamical system dataset on which iterative PDYffusion forecasts accumulate larger errors or show growing PDE violations than standard diffusion baselines after many steps would falsify the stability claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09058 by Min Young Baeg, Yoon-Yeong Kim.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Trade-off between accuracy and stability on SST dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Wave trajectory results of PDYffusion and DYffusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Long-horizon spatiotemporal prediction remains a challenging problem due to cumulative errors, noise amplification, and the lack of physical consistency in existing models. While diffusion models provide a probabilistic framework for modeling uncertainty, conventional approaches often rely on mean squared error objectives and fail to capture the underlying dynamics governed by physical laws. In this work, we propose PDYffusion, a dynamics-informed diffusion framework that integrates PDE-based regularization and uncertainty-aware forecasting for stable long-term prediction. The proposed method consists of two key components: a PDE-regularized interpolator and a UKF-based forecaster. The interpolator incorporates a differential operator to enforce physically consistent intermediate states, while the forecaster leverages the Unscented Kalman Filter to explicitly model uncertainty and mitigate error accumulation during iterative prediction. We provide theoretical analyses showing that the proposed interpolator satisfies PDE-constrained smoothness properties, and that the forecaster converges under the proposed loss formulation. Extensive experiments on multiple dynamical datasets demonstrate that PDYffusion achieves superior performance in terms of CRPS and MSE, while maintaining stable uncertainty behavior measured by SSR. We further analyze the inherent trade-off between prediction accuracy and uncertainty, showing that our method provides a balanced and robust solution for long-horizon forecasting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

PDYffusion combines PDE regularization in a diffusion interpolator with a UKF forecaster, but the long-horizon stability claims lack explicit bounds on iterative error growth.

read the letter

The paper introduces PDYffusion as a diffusion-based approach that adds a PDE-regularized interpolator to enforce physical smoothness on intermediate states and pairs it with an unscented Kalman filter forecaster to handle uncertainty during rollout. This targets the real issue of cumulative errors in long-horizon spatiotemporal prediction for systems governed by dynamics like fluid flow or climate variables. The combination is the clearest new element, since diffusion models for dynamics and PDE constraints exist separately, but their integration here with UKF for explicit uncertainty propagation during iteration is not standard in the abstract. Experiments reportedly show gains on CRPS and MSE while keeping SSR stable across dynamical datasets, which suggests the method can deliver usable forecasts where plain diffusion drifts. The theoretical section claims the interpolator meets PDE-constrained smoothness and the forecaster converges under the loss, which is a reasonable direction for grounding the work. The stress-test concern holds: the abstract gives no contraction bound or growth estimate that would guarantee error does not compound over many steps, so the reported stability could still be dataset-specific rather than a general consequence of the regularization. Without the explicit loss or the step-by-step argument showing how PDE terms limit propagation in the iterative loop, the long-horizon guarantee remains incomplete. Ablations on the PDE term versus the UKF component would also help isolate what drives the gains. This is worth a serious referee for groups working on physics-informed generative models for forecasting. Readers focused on climate or engineering simulation would get practical ideas from the UKF integration even if the stability analysis needs tightening. I would send it to peer review because the core components are well-motivated and the empirical claims are testable, though revisions on the error bounds are likely.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces PDYffusion, a dynamics-informed diffusion framework consisting of a PDE-regularized interpolator that enforces physical consistency via a differential operator and a UKF-based forecaster that models uncertainty to reduce error accumulation in iterative long-horizon predictions. It claims theoretical results establishing PDE-constrained smoothness for the interpolator and convergence of the forecaster under the proposed loss, together with empirical superiority over baselines in CRPS, MSE, and SSR on multiple dynamical datasets.

Significance. If the theoretical smoothness and convergence properties hold and translate to controlled error growth, the work would be significant for physics-informed probabilistic forecasting, as it directly targets cumulative error and lack of physical consistency in diffusion-based long-horizon models. The PDE-UKF combination offers a concrete mechanism for enforcing consistency that could generalize to other spatiotemporal systems.

major comments (2)

[Theoretical analyses] The theoretical analyses assert PDE-constrained smoothness and forecaster convergence under the proposed loss, yet supply no explicit contraction bound, stability estimate, or growth rate on iterative error propagation across many rollout steps. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the method prevents cumulative error in long-horizon prediction; without such a bound the reported CRPS/MSE gains could be artifacts of short effective horizons or specific initial conditions rather than a general consequence of the regularization.
[Experiments] The experimental section reports superior performance on CRPS, MSE, and SSR across dynamical datasets but provides no dataset specifications, training protocols, ablation studies isolating the PDE term versus the UKF component, or quantitative validation that the theoretical smoothness properties actually reduce error accumulation in the tested rollouts.

minor comments (2)

The loss formulation used for forecaster convergence is referenced but not written explicitly; including the precise expression (including any weighting between diffusion and PDE terms) would improve clarity.
Figure captions and axis labels for the uncertainty (SSR) plots should explicitly state the number of rollout steps and the range of initial conditions to allow readers to judge the effective horizon length.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential significance of the PDE-UKF combination for physics-informed long-horizon forecasting. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that directly strengthen the theoretical and empirical support for our central claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theoretical analyses] The theoretical analyses assert PDE-constrained smoothness and forecaster convergence under the proposed loss, yet supply no explicit contraction bound, stability estimate, or growth rate on iterative error propagation across many rollout steps. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the method prevents cumulative error in long-horizon prediction; without such a bound the reported CRPS/MSE gains could be artifacts of short effective horizons or specific initial conditions rather than a general consequence of the regularization.

Authors: We agree that an explicit contraction or stability bound on iterative error would provide stronger theoretical grounding for the long-horizon claim. Our existing results establish PDE-constrained smoothness of the interpolator (via the differential operator) and convergence of the forecaster under the proposed loss; these properties together imply controlled error growth, but we did not derive a quantitative growth rate or contraction factor across rollout steps. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection deriving a stability estimate that bounds the propagated error using the Lipschitz properties of the PDE operator and the UKF covariance update, showing that the combined mechanism yields sub-linear error accumulation under standard assumptions on the dynamical system. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] The experimental section reports superior performance on CRPS, MSE, and SSR across dynamical datasets but provides no dataset specifications, training protocols, ablation studies isolating the PDE term versus the UKF component, or quantitative validation that the theoretical smoothness properties actually reduce error accumulation in the tested rollouts.

Authors: We will substantially expand the experimental section. Revisions will include: (i) complete dataset specifications (state dimensions, temporal discretization, noise characteristics, and train/test splits for each dynamical system); (ii) full training protocols (optimizer, learning-rate schedule, batch size, and regularization weights); (iii) ablation studies that separately disable the PDE term and the UKF component while keeping all other elements fixed; and (iv) quantitative validation plots of per-step and cumulative error versus rollout horizon, together with correlation analysis between the measured smoothness metric and observed error growth. These additions will directly demonstrate that the theoretical properties translate to reduced error accumulation on the evaluated rollouts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on independent theoretical analyses and external experiments

full rationale

The abstract and provided context describe a proposed PDYffusion method with two components (PDE-regularized interpolator and UKF forecaster), followed by separate theoretical analyses asserting PDE-constrained smoothness and forecaster convergence under a stated loss, plus empirical evaluation on multiple dynamical datasets using CRPS, MSE, and SSR metrics. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the performance claims are presented as outcomes of external testing rather than tautological renamings or predictions forced by the model definition itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the benchmarks given.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The framework appears to rest on standard assumptions from diffusion models, PDE theory, and Kalman filtering without introducing new postulated entities or ad-hoc parameters visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1295 out tokens · 38692 ms · 2026-05-10T17:39:48.253723+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Arendt and R

W. Arendt and R. Mazzeo , Spectral properties of the dirichlet-to-neumann operator on lipschitz domains , Ulmer Seminare, 12 (2007), p. 33

2007
[2]

Aronszajn , Theory of reproducing kernels , Transactions of the American mathematical society, 68 (1950), pp

N. Aronszajn , Theory of reproducing kernels , Transactions of the American mathematical society, 68 (1950), pp. 337--404

1950
[3]

Bansal, E

A. Bansal, E. Borgnia, H.-M. Chu, J. Li, H. Kazemi, F. Huang, M. Goldblum, J. Geiping, and T. Goldstein , Cold diffusion: Inverting arbitrary image transforms without noise , Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36 (2023), pp. 41259--41282

2023
[4]

Bartz, H

S. Bartz, H. H. Bauschke, and X. Wang , The resolvent order: a unification of the orders by zarantonello, by loewner, and by moreau , SIAM Journal on Optimization, 27 (2017), pp. 466--477

2017
[5]

Black and M

F. Black and M. Scholes , The pricing of options and corporate liabilities , Journal of political economy, 81 (1973), pp. 637--654

1973
[6]

M. W. Davis , Production of conditional simulations via the lu triangular decomposition of the covariance matrix , Mathematical geology, 19 (1987), pp. 91--98

1987
[7]

J. L. Elman , Finding structure in time , Cognitive science, 14 (1990), pp. 179--211

1990
[8]

L. C. Evans , Partial differential equations , vol. 19, American mathematical society, 2022

2022
[9]

G. Evensen , Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using monte carlo methods to forecast error statistics , Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 99 (1994), pp. 10143--10162

1994
[10]

Fortin, M

V. Fortin, M. Abaza, F. Anctil, and R. Turcotte , Why should ensemble spread match the rmse of the ensemble mean? , Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15 (2014), pp. 1708--1713

2014
[11]

Gal and Z

Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani , Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning , in international conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2016, pp. 1050--1059

2016
[12]

I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio , Generative adversarial nets , Advances in neural information processing systems, 27 (2014)

2014
[13]

Gretton, K

A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, M. J. Rasch, B. Sch \"o lkopf, and A. Smola , A kernel two-sample test , The journal of machine learning research, 13 (2012), pp. 723--773

2012
[14]

J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel , Denoising diffusion probabilistic models , Advances in neural information processing systems, 33 (2020), pp. 6840--6851

2020
[15]

Hochreiter and J

S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber , Long short-term memory , Neural computation, 9 (1997), pp. 1735--1780

1997
[16]

Jazwinski , Filtering for nonlinear dynamical systems , IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11 (1966), pp

A. Jazwinski , Filtering for nonlinear dynamical systems , IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11 (1966), pp. 765--766

1966
[17]

S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann , Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , Proceedings of the IEEE, 92 (2004), pp. 401--422

2004
[18]

R. E. Kalman , A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems , (1960)

1960
[19]

Khristenko, L

U. Khristenko, L. Scarabosio, P. Swierczynski, E. Ullmann, and B. Wohlmuth , Analysis of boundary effects on pde-based sampling of whittle Mat\'ern random fields , SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 7 (2019), pp. 948--974

2019
[20]

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling , Auto-encoding variational bayes , CoRR, abs/1312.6114 (2013), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:216078090

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[21]

L \'e vy , Calcul des probabilit \'e s , Gauthier-Villars, 1925

P. L \'e vy , Calcul des probabilit \'e s , Gauthier-Villars, 1925

1925
[22]

J. E. Matheson and R. L. Winkler , Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions , Management science, 22 (1976), pp. 1087--1096

1976
[23]

FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators

J. Pathak, S. Subramanian, P. Harrington, S. Raja, A. Chattopadhyay, M. Mardani, T. Kurth, D. Hall, Z. Li, K. Azizzadenesheli, et al. , Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators , arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11214, (2022)

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[24]

Rezende and S

D. Rezende and S. Mohamed , Variational inference with normalizing flows , in International conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2015, pp. 1530--1538

2015
[25]

R \"u hling Cachay, B

S. R \"u hling Cachay, B. Zhao, H. Joren, and R. Yu , Dyffusion: A dynamics-informed diffusion model for spatiotemporal forecasting , Advances in neural information processing systems, 36 (2023), pp. 45259--45287

2023
[26]

Schwab and R

C. Schwab and R. A. Todor , Karhunen--lo \`e ve approximation of random fields by generalized fast multipole methods , Journal of Computational Physics, 217 (2006), pp. 100--122

2006
[27]

Shen and J

L. Shen and J. Kwok , Non-autoregressive conditional diffusion models for time series prediction , in International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2023, pp. 31016--31029

2023
[28]

J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon , Denoising diffusion implicit models , arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, (2020)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[29]

B. K. Sriperumbudur, A. Gretton, K. Fukumizu, B. Sch \"o lkopf, and G. R. Lanckriet , Hilbert space embeddings and metrics on probability measures , The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11 (2010), pp. 1517--1561

2010
[30]

Voleti, A

V. Voleti, A. Jolicoeur-Martineau, and C. Pal , Mcvd-masked conditional video diffusion for prediction, generation, and interpolation , Advances in neural information processing systems, 35 (2022), pp. 23371--23385

2022
[31]

H. Weyl , Das asymptotische verteilungsgesetz der eigenwerte linearer partieller differentialgleichungen (mit einer anwendung auf die theorie der hohlraumstrahlung) , Mathematische Annalen, 71 (1912), pp. 441--479

1912
[32]

Whittle , On stationary processes in the plane , Biometrika, 41 (1954), pp

P. Whittle , On stationary processes in the plane , Biometrika, 41 (1954), pp. 434--449, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2332724 (accessed 2026-01-29)

work page arXiv 1954
[33]

Whittle , Stochastic-processes in several dimensions , Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 40 (1963), pp

P. Whittle , Stochastic-processes in several dimensions , Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 40 (1963), pp. 974--994

1963