pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09141 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Bounding axion dark energy

Flavio Tonioni, Gary Shiu, Hung V. Tran

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-phhep-th
keywords axion dark energythawing quintessenceperiodic potentialscosmic accelerationquantum gravity constraintsDESIsupernovae
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axion fields with periodic potentials obey a universal bound on mass and decay constant as cosmic acceleration decreases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors analyze how axion-like fields with periodic potentials evolve cosmologically alongside ordinary matter and dark energy fluids. They show that an analytic relation between the axion's mass parameter and decay constant must hold whenever the universe's acceleration rate is dropping, and this relation does not depend on how the field started or its initial speed. This provides a tool for testing thawing quintessence, where the axion field begins to roll slowly. Applying the bound to axion dark energy using data from DESI and supernovae experiments, and adding constraints from quantum gravity, shows that viable axion masses become much larger than today's Hubble expansion rate, creating tension with simple axion quintessence ideas.

Core claim

Independently of the initial misalignment angle and field velocity, we derive an analytic bound that the axion mass parameter and decay constant fulfill as the universe decreases its acceleration rate. This bound applies to cosmological solutions of (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials in the presence of arbitrary cosmological fluids, including a cosmological constant of either sign. It finds natural application in models of thawing quintessence, and when used to bound axion dark energy with observational inputs, in combination with quantum gravity constraints excludes vast regions of parameter space and pushes axion masses much larger than the Hubble scale in tension with basic

What carries the argument

The analytic bound relating the axion mass parameter and decay constant that must be satisfied as the acceleration rate decreases.

If this is right

  • The bound provides an analytic handle for constraining axion dark energy parameters using data from DESI and various supernovae data sets.
  • Combined with quantum gravity constraints on axions, vast regions of parameter space are excluded.
  • The constraints push axion masses to be much larger than the Hubble scale, creating tension with basic models of axion quintessence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future surveys measuring the evolution of cosmic acceleration could provide tighter tests of the bound through improved constraints on dark energy behavior.
  • The same type of bound may apply to other scalar fields with periodic potentials in general cosmological settings beyond dark energy.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes cosmological solutions of (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials in the presence of arbitrary cosmological fluids including a cosmological constant of either sign, and that the bound applies directly to thawing quintessence without additional dynamical effects.

What would settle it

A measurement of dark energy evolution or an axion candidate detection showing parameters that violate the mass-decay constant relation while still matching the observed acceleration history would falsify the bound.

read the original abstract

We study cosmological solutions of (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials, in the presence of arbitrary cosmological fluids -- including a cosmological constant of either sign. Independently of the initial misalignment angle and field velocity, we derive an analytic bound that the axion mass parameter and decay constant fulfill as the universe decreases its acceleration rate, finding a natural application in models of thawing quintessence. As a first application, we illustrate the analytic handle our bound provides in bounding axion dark energy, after observational inputs from DESI and various supernovae data sets are taken into account. As a second application, we argue that our analytic bounds in combination with proposed quantum gravity constraints on axions exclude vast regions of parameter space. The combined constraints push the axion masses to be much larger than the Hubble scale, in tension with basic models of axion quintessence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives an analytic bound on the axion mass parameter m and decay constant f for (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials in the presence of arbitrary cosmological fluids (including a cosmological constant of either sign). The bound holds independently of the initial misalignment angle and field velocity as the universe decreases its acceleration rate, with direct application to thawing quintessence models. It then applies the bound to constrain axion dark energy using DESI and various supernovae datasets, and combines it with proposed quantum gravity constraints on axions to exclude large regions of parameter space, pushing axion masses much larger than the Hubble scale and creating tension with basic axion quintessence models.

Significance. If the bound is robust and applies without additional dynamical effects, the independence from initial conditions represents a genuine strength, offering an analytic handle that could complement or surpass numerical simulations in constraining axion dark energy. The data application and QG combination could meaningfully tighten viable parameter space for thawing quintessence, with potential implications for model building in dark energy and axion physics. The paper explicitly credits the parameter-free character of the derivation as a key feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [applications to thawing quintessence and data] The central application to thawing quintessence (mentioned in the abstract and developed in the applications section) requires explicit verification that the bound derivation's assumptions on field evolution hold in the thawing regime, where the effective DE equation-of-state departs from -1 starting near the potential minimum with near-zero velocity. The derivation assumes solutions where higher harmonics of the periodic potential and backreaction do not intervene, but without a dedicated check (e.g., via comparison to the equation of motion or conserved quantity in the thawing limit), extra effects such as non-monotonic acceleration or couplings could invalidate the direct mapping without violating the general setup.
  2. [first application (DESI and supernovae)] In the data application (DESI + SN constraints), the manuscript should clarify whether the bound remains independent of post-hoc choices in the observational inputs or error analysis; the abstract asserts an analytic derivation followed by data application, but any reduction to a fitted quantity would undermine the claimed independence from initials and fluids.
minor comments (2)
  1. [theory setup] Notation for the mass parameter m and decay constant f should be consistently defined with respect to the potential form V(φ) = m²f²(1 - cos(φ/f)) or equivalent, and cross-referenced to the general fluid setup.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for any plots of the bound or excluded regions should explicitly state the assumptions on the background fluids and acceleration evolution used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The two major comments raise valid points about verification in the thawing regime and clarification of the data application. We respond to each below and will incorporate revisions to address them.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [applications to thawing quintessence and data] The central application to thawing quintessence (mentioned in the abstract and developed in the applications section) requires explicit verification that the bound derivation's assumptions on field evolution hold in the thawing regime, where the effective DE equation-of-state departs from -1 starting near the potential minimum with near-zero velocity. The derivation assumes solutions where higher harmonics of the periodic potential and backreaction do not intervene, but without a dedicated check (e.g., via comparison to the equation of motion or conserved quantity in the thawing limit), extra effects such as non-monotonic acceleration or couplings could invalidate the direct mapping without violating the general setup.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check strengthens the application to thawing quintessence. The bound derivation is general for arbitrary fluids provided the acceleration rate decreases, a condition satisfied in standard thawing models where the field begins near the potential minimum with small velocity. We will add a new subsection (or appendix) that solves the equation of motion numerically in the thawing limit for representative parameter values, compares the resulting field evolution against the analytic bound, and confirms that higher harmonics and backreaction remain negligible within the cosmologically relevant regime. This will also address potential non-monotonicity by tracking the acceleration rate explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [first application (DESI and supernovae)] In the data application (DESI + SN constraints), the manuscript should clarify whether the bound remains independent of post-hoc choices in the observational inputs or error analysis; the abstract asserts an analytic derivation followed by data application, but any reduction to a fitted quantity would undermine the claimed independence from initials and fluids.

    Authors: The analytic bound depends only on the decrease in acceleration rate and is independent of axion initial conditions and fluid details by construction. In the data section we insert the observed acceleration history (constrained by DESI and SN datasets) into this bound to limit m and f; no fitting or post-hoc adjustment of the bound itself occurs. We will revise the text and abstract to state this distinction explicitly, noting that while the input acceleration values carry observational uncertainties, the independence of the bound from initial conditions and fluids is preserved. No reduction to a fitted quantity is performed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytic bound on axion parameters derived from equations of motion without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper claims to derive an analytic bound on the axion mass parameter and decay constant for (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials, holding independently of initial misalignment angle and field velocity, in the presence of arbitrary fluids including a cosmological constant. This is presented as following directly from the cosmological solutions and applied to thawing quintessence and data. No load-bearing step reduces the bound to a fitted quantity, self-citation chain, or definitional equivalence by construction; the independence from initials is asserted as a derived property rather than assumed. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; full derivation details unavailable. The central claim rests on standard assumptions about scalar field dynamics in cosmology.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cosmological solutions exist for (pseudo)scalar theories with periodic potentials in the presence of arbitrary fluids including cosmological constant of either sign.
    This is the explicit setup stated for deriving the bound.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1243 out tokens · 42811 ms · 2026-05-10T17:12:35.810173+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    DESI Collaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,JCAP02(2025) 021 [2404.03002]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    DESI Collaboration,DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083514 [2503.14739]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    DESI Collaboration,DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083515 [2503.14738]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles,Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3406

    1988

  5. [5]

    Wetterich, Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Sym- metry, Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B302(1988) 668 [1711.03844]

    work page arXiv 1988

  6. [6]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 1582 [astro-ph/9708069]

    work page arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review,

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    work page arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Montero and G

    M. Montero and G. Shiu,A Gentle Hike Through the Swampland, pp. 1–38. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023. 10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9 67-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9 2023

  10. [10]

    Obied, H

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa,De Sitter Space and the Swampland, 1806.08362

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 180 [1810.05506]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,JHEP09(2020) 123 [1909.11063]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    U. H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet,What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2018) 1830007 [1804.01120]

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Agrawal, G

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P. J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa,On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 271 [1806.09718]

    work page arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Heisenberg, M

    L. Heisenberg, M. Bartelmann, R. Brandenberger and A. Refregier,Dark Energy in the Swampland,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 123502 [1808.02877]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Cicoli, S

    M. Cicoli, S. De Alwis, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo,De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1800079 [1808.08967]. – 27 –

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Raveri, W

    M. Raveri, W. Hu and S. Sethi,Swampland Conjectures and Late-Time Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083518 [1812.10448]

    work page arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory,JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    Marchesano, G

    F. Marchesano, G. Shiu and T. Weigand,The Standard Model from String Theory: What Have We Learned?,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.74(2024) 113 [2401.01939]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1 [2303.04819]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review

    D. Andriot,Dark energy from string theory: an introductory review,2603.25797

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Rudelius,On the Possibility of Large Axion Moduli Spaces,JCAP04(2015) 049 [1409.5793]

    T. Rudelius,On the Possibility of Large Axion Moduli Spaces,JCAP04(2015) 049 [1409.5793]

    work page arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Rudelius,Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP09(2015) 020 [1503.00795]

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JCAP09 (2015) 020 [1503.00795]

    work page arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Brown, W

    J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler,Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation,JHEP10(2015) 023 [1503.04783]

    work page arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Brown, W

    J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler,On Axionic Field Ranges, Loopholes and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP04(2016) 017 [1504.00659]

    work page arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation,JHEP12(2015) 108 [1506.03447]

    work page arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    H. N. Luu, Y.-C. Qiu and S. H. H. Tye,Dynamical dark energy from an ultralight axion,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023524 [2503.18120]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder,The Limits of quintessence,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 141301 [astro-ph/0505494]

    work page arXiv 2005

  30. [30]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15 (2006) 1753 [hep-th/0603057]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Tsujikawa,Quintessence: A Review,Class

    S. Tsujikawa,Quintessence: A Review,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 214003 [1304.1961]

    work page arXiv 2013

  32. [32]

    DESI Collaboration,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083511 [2503.14743]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez et al.,Updated cosmological constraints on axion dark energy with DESI, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 103505 [2503.20178]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    W. Lin, L. Visinelli and T. T. Yanagida,Testing quintessence axion dark energy with recent cosmological results,JCAP10(2025) 023 [2504.17638]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Arkani-Hamed, L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,JHEP06(2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001]

    work page arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    T. C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister,Planckian Axions and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP01(2016) 091 [1503.07853]

    work page arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003 [2201.08380]. – 28 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Kamionkowski, J

    M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler and D. G. E. Walker,Dark energy from the string axiverse,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 251302 [1409.0549]

    work page arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology,JHEP10(2012) 146 [1206.0819]

    work page arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    D. J. E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology,Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]

    work page arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. Lust,S-dual quintessence, the Swampland, and the DESI DR2 results,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139632 [2503.19428]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto,Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 3233

    1990

  43. [43]

    F. C. Adams, J. R. Bond, K. Freese, J. A. Frieman and A. V. Olinto,Natural inflation: Particle physics models, power law spectra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 426 [hep-ph/9207245]

    work page arXiv 1993

  44. [44]

    J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins and I. Waga,Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2077 [astro-ph/9505060]

    work page arXiv 1995

  45. [45]

    Pajer and M

    E. Pajer and M. Peloso,A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck,Class. Quant. Grav. 30(2013) 214002 [1305.3557]

    work page arXiv 2013

  46. [46]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle and D. Wands,Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 4686 [gr-qc/9711068]

    work page arXiv 1998

  47. [47]

    Katewongveerachart and D

    S. Katewongveerachart and D. J. E. Marsh,Cosmological Dynamics of Multi-Axion Quintessence,2602.00820

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    J. H. T. Yip, C. Arnal, F. Charton and G. Shiu,Transforming Calabi-Yau Constructions: Generating New Calabi-Yau Manifolds with Transformers,2507.03732

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    M. W. Toomey, G. Montefalcone, E. McDonough and K. Freese,How Theory-Informed Priors Affect DESI Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy,2509.13318. [52]PlanckCollaboration,Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A5 [1907.12875]

    work page arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,JCAP09 (2022) 039 [2206.07773]. [54]ACTcollaboration, M. S. Madhavacheril et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,Astrophys. J.962(2024) 113 [2304.05203]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Rubin et al., Astrophys

    D. Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework,Astrophys. J.986(2025) 231 [2311.12098]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    DES Collaboration,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift – 29 – Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L14 [2401.02929]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    DES Collaboration,Dark Energy Survey: Implications for cosmological expansion models from the final DES baryon acoustic oscillation and supernova data,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063530 [2503.06712]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez,Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16(2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018]

    work page arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    McAllister and A

    L. McAllister and A. Schachner,TASI Lectures on de Sitter Vacua, 12, 2025,2512.17095

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Andriolo, T.-C

    S. Andriolo, T.-C. Huang, T. Noumi, H. Ooguri and G. Shiu,Duality and axionic weak gravity, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 046008 [2004.13721]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Andriolo, G

    S. Andriolo, G. Shiu, P. Soler and T. Van Riet,Axion wormholes with massive dilaton,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 215014 [2205.01119]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds,

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, S. Kachru and T. Weigand,D-Brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009) 269 [0902.3251]

    work page arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten,Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043541 [1610.08297]

    work page arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]

    M. Reece,Extra-dimensional axion expectations,JHEP07(2025) 130 [2406.08543]. [67]Planckcollaboration,PlanckCollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    de la Fuente, P

    A. de la Fuente, P. Saraswat and R. Sundrum,Natural Inflation and Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 151303 [1412.3457]

    work page arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Montero, A.M

    M. Montero, A. M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,Transplanckian axions!?,JHEP08(2015) 032 [1503.03886]

    work page arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Hebecker, P

    A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve and L. T. Witkowski,Winding out of the Swamp: Evading the Weak Gravity Conjecture with F-term Winding Inflation?,Phys. Lett. B748 (2015) 455 [1503.07912]

    work page arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Rudelius, JCAP01, 014, arXiv:2203.05575 [hep-th]

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on early dark energy from the axion weak gravity conjecture,JCAP01 (2023) 014 [2203.05575]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture, JHEP08(2017) 025 [1606.08437]

    work page arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche and T. Weigand,Modular Fluxes, Elliptic Genera, and Weak Gravity Conjectures in Four Dimensions,JHEP08(2019) 104 [1901.08065]

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Cheung and G.N

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2014) 051601 [1402.2287]

    work page arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Emami, D

    R. Emami, D. Grin, J. Pradler, A. Raccanelli and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological tests of an axiverse-inspired quintessence field,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123005 [1603.04851]

    work page arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Cunillera, A. Padilla and F. G. Pedro,Quintessence and the Swampland: The Numerically Controlled Regime of Moduli Space,Fortsch. Phys.70(2022) 2200008 [2112.10783]. – 30 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Cicoli, G

    M. Cicoli, G. Dibitetto and F. G. Pedro,New accelerating solutions in late-time cosmology, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103524 [2002.02695]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Andriot, S

    D. Andriot, S. Parameswaran, D. Tsimpis, T. Wrase and I. Zavala,Exponential quintessence: curved, steep and stringy?,JHEP08(2024) 117 [2405.09323]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti and J. Khoury,Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 083509 [astro-ph/0510628]

    work page arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    Agrawal, G

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied and C. Vafa,H 0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043523 [1906.08261]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,

    A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa and D. H. Wu,Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,2507.03090

    work page arXiv

  77. [77]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni and H. V. Tran,Analytic bounds on late-time axion-scalar cosmologies, JHEP09(2024) 158 [2406.17030]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni and H. V. Tran,Long-lived SEC violation via DM/DE couplings,JHEP02 (2026) 042 [2506.19914]

    work page arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301 [1811.04083]

    work page arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    McDonough, M.-X

    E. McDonough, M.-X. Lin, J. C. Hill, W. Hu and S. Zhou,Early dark sector, the Hubble tension, and the swampland,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043525 [2112.09128]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.