arxiv: 2604.09740 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Spin-(0, 1, frac{1}{2}) Field Perturbations, Quasinormal Modes, Overtones, Greybody Factors and Strong Cosmic Censorship of Einstein-Skyrme Black Holes

Faizuddin Ahmed , Ahmad Al-Badawi , \.Izzet Sakall{\i}

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

keywords Einstein-Skyrme black holesquasinormal modesstrong cosmic censorshipgreybody factorsblack hole perturbationsAdS black holesovertones

0 comments

The pith

Einstein-Skyrme black holes satisfy strong cosmic censorship because their quasinormal modes yield a Christodoulou parameter well below the critical value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines perturbations of scalar, electromagnetic and Dirac fields around an Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole. The metric is determined by two parameters from the Skyrme model that are related by the theory. Quasinormal modes are found using the sixth-order WKB approximation, verified with Padé expansion and time-domain methods. Greybody factors are calculated for each spin. The central result is that the Christodoulou parameter beta is always less than 4 times 10 to the minus 3, protecting strong cosmic censorship.

Core claim

We compute the quasinormal modes of the Einstein-Skyrme black hole for different spins and use them to evaluate the Christodoulou parameter at the Cauchy horizon. Across the allowed range of the Skyrme couplings K and e, this parameter remains at or below 4×10^{-3}, which is more than two orders of magnitude smaller than the 1/2 value that would allow violation of strong cosmic censorship. The ordering of greybody factors is T for electromagnetic less than scalar less than Dirac, and a mild anomaly appears in the first overtone ratios.

What carries the argument

Quasinormal mode frequencies computed via the WKB method on the Einstein-Skyrme background, from which the Christodoulou parameter β is derived to test strong cosmic censorship.

If this is right

The strong cosmic censorship conjecture holds for Einstein-Skyrme black holes with significant margin.
The ratio of imaginary parts of the first overtone to the fundamental mode is between 2.42 and 2.54 for scalar and electromagnetic perturbations.
Greybody factors increase from electromagnetic to scalar to Dirac fields.
The WKB results for the dominant mode are confirmed by independent time-domain Prony fits to within 0.2 percent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The fixed coupling relation in the Skyrme model may be responsible for the robust protection of cosmic censorship.
This approach of using theory-constrained metrics could be applied to other modified gravity models to check censorship.
If higher-order corrections to the WKB method alter the frequencies significantly, the small beta value might change.

Load-bearing premise

The lapse function derived from the Skyrme model is the precise background metric and the numerical methods for quasinormal modes introduce negligible errors in the relevant parameter range.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation that the dominant quasinormal mode frequency has an imaginary part small enough to push the Christodoulou parameter above one half for some value of the Skyrme parameters would disprove the conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09740 by Ahmad Al-Badawi, Faizuddin Ahmed, \.Izzet Sakall{\i}.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Behaviour of the scalar effective potential Vscalar as a function of the radial distance r, for M = 1, ℓ = 2. Left: K = 0.002 fixed, e varying. Right: e = 6 fixed, K varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Behaviour of the Dirac effective potential V+ as a function of the radial distance r, for M = 1, j = 1/2. Left: K = 0.002 fixed, e varying. Right: e = 6 fixed, K varying. with κ = 1 at j = 1/2, roughly a factor of six below the ℓ(ℓ + 1) = 6 of the scalar reference curve. This is the direct counterpart of the well-known softening of the Dirac barrier in the Schwarzschild limit, and it provides the ES-AdS pr… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Reflection coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Transmission coefficient as a function of frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We carry out a multi-spin perturbation-theory study of the four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme (ES) anti-de Sitter (AdS) black hole (BH), whose lapse $f(r)=1-8\pi K-2M/r+4\pi K\lambda/r^{2}$ inherits two couplings from the hadronic model -- the pion combination $K=F_{\pi}^{2}/4$ and the Skyrme coupling $e$ -- with $K\lambda=1/e^{2}$ pinned by the theory rather than being a free integration constant. After deriving the Klein-Gordon, Maxwell and Dirac effective potentials on this background, we compute the quasinormal modes (QNMs) with the sixth-order WKB formula and cross-check them against the thirteenth-order Pad\'e-improved expansion and the eikonal limit set by the unstable photon sphere. The first overtone $(n=1)$ of the scalar and electromagnetic channels reveals a mild Konoplya-Zhidenko anomaly: the ratio $|\mathrm{Im}\,\omega_{1}|/|\mathrm{Im}\,\omega_{0}|$ drifts monotonically from $2.42$ to $2.54$, sitting noticeably below the Schwarzschild value near $3$. The dominant scalar mode is independently reproduced to better than $0.2\%$ by a time-domain Prony fit. Greybody factors for all three spins follow the ordering $T_{\rm EM}<T_{\rm scalar}<T_{\rm Dirac}$. Testing strong cosmic censorship at the Cauchy horizon, we find the Christodoulou parameter $\beta\lesssim 4\times 10^{-3}$ across the admissible $(K,e)$ window -- more than two orders of magnitude below the threshold $1/2$ -- with the margin protected by the theory itself.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole keeps the strong cosmic censorship parameter β well below threshold, with solid cross-checked numerics on its quasinormal modes and greybody factors.

read the letter

The main takeaway here is that the Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole satisfies strong cosmic censorship comfortably, with the Christodoulou parameter β staying below 4 times 10 to the minus 3 across the allowed range of the Skyrme couplings. The paper also reports a mild Konoplya-Zhidenko anomaly in the first overtones and a consistent ordering of the greybody factors for the three spins. They take the exact metric from the model, with the lapse fixed by K and e from hadronic physics, and compute the effective potentials for spin 0, 1, and 1/2 fields. The quasinormal modes come from the sixth-order WKB formula improved by thirteenth-order Padé, checked against the eikonal limit from the photon sphere and a time-domain Prony fit that matches the dominant scalar mode to 0.2 percent. That level of agreement gives some confidence in the numerics. What the paper does well is the cross-checks and the fact that λ is not free but pinned by the Skyrme term. The greybody factors follow T_EM < T_scalar < T_Dirac, which lines up with the potential heights. The small β is not marginal; it's more than two orders below the threshold, and the model itself keeps it there. The soft spots are minor. The anomaly in the overtone ratio is present but small, drifting only from 2.42 to 2.54, so it is more of an observation than a major shift from Schwarzschild behavior. The work is entirely numerical for this specific background, so it does not offer analytic insight or broad theorems. Error bars on the WKB results are not detailed in the abstract, though the multiple methods help. This paper is for people who follow quasinormal mode calculations in alternative gravity models or who care about strong cosmic censorship in AdS. A reader looking for concrete numbers on perturbations of Skyrme black holes will find it useful. It is not going to change the field broadly, but the calculations look solid enough to warrant a serious referee. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes scalar (spin-0), electromagnetic (spin-1), and Dirac (spin-1/2) perturbations on the four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole with lapse function f(r)=1-8πK-2M/r+4πKλ/r², where K and e are fixed by the Skyrme model and λ=K/e² is not free. Effective potentials are derived for each field; quasinormal modes are computed with the sixth-order WKB formula plus thirteenth-order Padé approximant, cross-validated against the eikonal limit and a time-domain Prony fit (0.2% agreement on the dominant scalar mode). Greybody factors satisfy T_EM < T_scalar < T_Dirac. Strong cosmic censorship is tested via the Christodoulou parameter β, which remains ≲4×10^{-3} over the admissible (K,e) window, more than two orders of magnitude below the 1/2 threshold.

Significance. If the reported quasinormal-mode spectra hold, the work supplies concrete numerical support that strong cosmic censorship is satisfied with a wide margin in a black-hole model whose parameters are anchored in hadronic physics rather than chosen ad hoc. The multi-method verification (WKB/Padé, eikonal, time-domain) and the internal consistency between greybody ordering and potential shapes strengthen the central claim. The result illustrates how the Skyrme coupling itself protects the censorship bound, offering a bridge between particle-physics input and gravitational censorship tests.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the dominant scalar mode agrees to better than 0.2% with the Prony fit is given without accompanying error bars, convergence tests, or the precise (K,e) values over which the agreement was verified. Adding a short clause on numerical precision and parameter coverage would make the summary self-contained.
[Quasinormal-mode section] The sixth-order WKB plus thirteenth-order Padé results are presented for selected modes, yet the text does not include explicit tables or figures demonstrating convergence with WKB order or Padé order across the full admissible (K,e) range. Such supplementary material would allow readers to assess robustness for higher overtones and near-extremal parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for the recommendation of minor revision. Their summary correctly captures the scope of our multi-spin perturbation analysis, the verification methods employed for the quasinormal modes, the ordering of the greybody factors, and the strong margin by which the Christodoulou parameter satisfies the strong cosmic censorship bound in the Einstein-Skyrme model.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from the exact Einstein-Skyrme lapse function whose parameters K and λ are fixed by the underlying Skyrme model (Kλ = 1/e²) rather than fitted to the target observables. Effective potentials for scalar, electromagnetic and Dirac perturbations are obtained by direct substitution into the standard wave equations on this background. Quasinormal frequencies are then extracted via the sixth-order WKB formula supplemented by Padé approximants, with independent cross-checks against the eikonal limit and a time-domain Prony fit; none of these numerical steps redefine or presuppose the final Christodoulou parameter β. The reported bound β ≲ 4×10^{-3} is therefore a downstream numerical output, not a tautological restatement of the input metric or of any self-citation. The entire chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or load-bearing self-citation reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Skyrme model supplying the exact metric form and on standard assumptions of black hole perturbation theory; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

K
Pion-related coupling constant F_π²/4 from the hadronic Skyrme model
e
Skyrme coupling constant with λ=1/e² fixed by the model

axioms (3)

domain assumption The four-dimensional Einstein-Skyrme AdS black hole with the stated lapse function is a valid exact solution
Taken directly from integration of the Skyrme model into Einstein gravity
domain assumption The WKB approximation with Padé improvement and the eikonal limit reliably compute the quasinormal modes
Standard technique in black hole perturbation theory
domain assumption The Christodoulou parameter β is the correct diagnostic for strong cosmic censorship at the Cauchy horizon
Adopted from existing literature on the conjecture

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1679 out tokens · 70315 ms · 2026-05-10T16:42:18.102271+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

2019a, ApJ, 875, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K.,

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875: L1, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019
[2]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L4, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85 2019
[3]

2019b, ApJL, 875, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, et al

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L6, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019
[4]

2022, ApJL, 930, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930:L12, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022
[5]

2022b, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930:L16, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6672 2022
[6]

2022c, ApJL, 930, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, et al

Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930: L17, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756 2022
[7]

Aghanim et al

N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201833910. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

2018
[8]

B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:061102, 2016. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016
[9]

B. P. Abbott et al. Localization and Broadband Follow-up of the Gravitational-wave Transient GW150914.Astrophys. J. Lett., 826:L13, 2016. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/L13

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/l13 2016
[10]

B. P. Abbott et al. GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:161101, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. 24

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017
[11]

Abbott et al

R. Abbott et al. GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses.Phys. Rev. D, 102:043015, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043015

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 2020
[12]

S. E. Woosley, A. Heger, and T. A. Weaver. The evolution and explosion of massive stars.Rev. Mod. Phys., 74:1015–1071, 2002. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.1015 2002
[13]

The maximum mass of a neutron star.Astrophys

Vassiliki Kalogera and Gordon Baym. The Maximum mass of a neutron star.Astrophys. J. Lett., 470:L61–L64, 1996. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1086/310296

work page doi:10.1086/310296 1996
[14]

S. Hawking. Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 152:75, 1971. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/152.1.75

1971
[15]

Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes

S. Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998

1998
[16]

J. P. Cavalcante and B. C. da Cunha. Scalar and Dirac perturbations of the Reissner-Nordstrom black hole and Painleve transcendents.Phys. Rev. D, 104:124040, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124040

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.124040 2021
[17]

R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal modes of four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity: Overtones’ outburst via wkb method,
[18]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.03189

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.03189
[19]

Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes corrected by nonlinear electrodynamics

Jie Liang, Dong Liu, and Zheng-Wen Long. Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes corrected by nonlinear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C, 86:17, 2026. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15245-z

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15245-z 2026
[20]

Scalar, Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit.Phys

Paolo Pani, Emanuele Berti, and Leonardo Gualtieri. Scalar, Electromagnetic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit.Phys. Rev. D, 88:064048, 2013. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064048

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.064048 2013
[21]

Dirac, Schroedinger, and Maxwell equations in scalar and vector field quantum mechanics

B. Chichkov. Dirac, schroedinger, and maxwell equations in scalar and vector field quantum mechanics, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2508.14583

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[22]

Z. Malik. Grey-Body Factors for Scalar and Dirac Fields in the Euler-Heisenberg Electrodynamics.Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys., 1(1):6, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.53941/ijgtp.2025.100006

work page doi:10.53941/ijgtp.2025.100006 2025
[23]

Sekhmani, D

Y. Sekhmani, D. J. Gogoi, S. K. Maurya, K. Boshkayev, and M. K. Jasim. Quasinormal modes and greybody bounds of black holes endowed with modified Chaplygin gas.J. High Energy Astrophys., 45:200–214, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.008

work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.11.008 2025
[24]

S. V. Bolokhov. Long-lived quasinormal modes and overtones’ behavior of holonomy-corrected black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 110:024010, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.024010

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024010 2024
[25]

Al-Badawi, S

A. Al-Badawi, S. Kanzi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Solutions of the Dirac equation in Bonnor-Melvin-Lambda space-time.Annals Phys., 452:169294, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169294

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169294 2023
[27]

A. G. Abac et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 Solar-Mass Compact Object and a Neutron Star.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:111403, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.135.111403

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.135.111403 2025
[28]

R. A. Konoplya and Alexander Zhidenko. Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory.Rev. Mod. Phys., 83:793–836,
[29]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.793

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.793
[30]

S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova. Quasinormal Ringing and Shadows of Black Holes and Wormholes in Dark Matter Inspired Weyl Gravity. Grav. Cosmol., 31:423, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289325700306

work page doi:10.1134/s0202289325700306 2025
[31]

Living Rev Rel 2:2

Kostas D. Kokkotas and Bernd G. Schmidt. Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes.Living Rev. Rel., 2:2, 1999. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.12942/lrr-1999-2

work page doi:10.12942/lrr-1999-2 1999
[32]

R. A. Konoplya. The sound of the event horizon.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(14):2342014, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271823420142

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271823420142 2023
[34]

Starinets

Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Andrei O. Starinets. Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes.Class. Quant. Grav., 26:163001,
[35]

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001
[36]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. First few overtones probe the event horizon geometry.Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 44:419–426, November 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.015 2024
[37]

Greybody radiation of scalar and Dirac perturbations of NUT black holes.Eur

Ahmad Al-Badawi, Sara Kanzi, and ˙Izzet Sakallı. Greybody radiation of scalar and Dirac perturbations of NUT black holes.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137(1):94, 2022. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02227-9 2022
[38]

Al-Badawi, ˙I

A. Al-Badawi, ˙I. Sakallı, and S. Kanzi. Solution of Dirac equation and greybody radiation around a regular Bardeen black hole surrounded by quintessence.Annals Phys., 412:168026, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.168026

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.168026 2020
[39]

Al-Badawi, S

A. Al-Badawi, S. Kanzi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody factor and Hawking radiation for a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135:219, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00245-7

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00245-7 2020
[40]

Kanzi, S

S. Kanzi, S. H. Mazharimousavi, and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody factors of black holes in dRGT massive gravity coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics. Annals Phys., 422:168301, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168301

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2020.168301 2020
[41]

Kanzi and ˙I

S. Kanzi and ˙I. Sakallı. Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81: 501, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09299-y. 25

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09299-y 2021
[42]

Sakallı and S

˙I. Sakallı and S. Kanzi. Physical properties of brane-world black hole solutions via a confining potential.Annals Phys., 439:168803, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.168803

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2022.168803 2022
[43]

Heidari, J

Dhruba Jyoti Gogoi, N. Heidari, J. Kriz, and H. Hassanabadi. Quasinormal modes and greybody factors of black holes in modified gravity. Fortsch. Phys., 72:2300245, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202300245

work page doi:10.1002/prop.202300245 2024
[44]

Hosseinifar, A

F. Hosseinifar, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, M. Y. Zhang, H. Chen, and H. Hassanabadi. Shadows, greybody factors, emission rate, topological charge, and phase transitions for a charged black hole with a kalb-ramond field background, 2024

2024
[45]

Sekhmani, D

Y. Sekhmani, D. J. Gogoi, S. K. Maurya, K. Boshkayev, and M. K. Jasim. Effects of modified Chaplygin gas and quintessence on black hole field propagation.JHEAp, 45:200, 2025. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.12.012 2025
[46]

Sakallı and S

˙I. Sakallı and S. Kanzi. Topical review on greybody factors and quasinormal modes in various theories.Turk. J. Phys., 46(2):51, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0101.2691

work page doi:10.55730/1300-0101.2691 2022
[47]

Costa, Kyriakos Destounis, Peter Hintz, and Aron Jansen

Vitor Cardoso, Jo˜ ao L. Costa, Kyriakos Destounis, Peter Hintz, and Aron Jansen. Quasinormal modes and Strong Cosmic Censorship.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:031103, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031103

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.031103 2018
[48]

Oscar J. C. Dias, Felicity C. Eperon, Harvey S. Reall, and Jorge E. Santos. Strong cosmic censorship in de Sitter space.Phys. Rev. D, 97: 104060, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104060

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.104060 2018
[49]

Quasinormal modes and strong cosmic censorship in near-extremal Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black-hole spacetimes.Phys

Shahar Hod. Quasinormal modes and strong cosmic censorship in near-extremal Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black-hole spacetimes.Phys. Lett. B, 780:221–226, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.020

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.03.020 2018
[50]

Oscar J. C. Dias, Harvey S. Reall, and Jorge E. Santos. Strong cosmic censorship for charged de Sitter black holes with a charged scalar field. Class. Quant. Grav., 36:045005, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aafcf2

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aafcf2 2019
[51]

T. H. R. Skyrme. A non-linear field theory.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 260:127–138, 1961. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1961.0018

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1961.0018 1961
[52]

T. H. R. Skyrme. Particle states of a quantized meson field.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 262:237–245, 1961. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa. 1961.0115

work page doi:10.1098/rspa 1961
[53]

T. H. R. Skyrme. A unified field theory of mesons and baryons.Nucl. Phys., 31:556–569, 1962. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(62) 90775-7

work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(62 1962
[54]

Hedgehog ansatz and its generalization for self-gravitating Skyrmions.Phys

Fabrizio Canfora and Hideki Maeda. Hedgehog ansatz and its generalization for self-gravitating Skyrmions.Phys. Rev. D, 87:084049, 2013. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.084049

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.084049 2013
[55]

S. Droz, M. Heusler, and N. Straumann. New black hole solutions with hair.Phys. Lett. B, 268:371–376, 1991. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(91)91592-J

1991
[56]

Exact meron Black Holes in four dimensional SU(2) Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.Phys

Fabrizio Canfora, Francisco Correa, Alex Giacomini, and Julio Oliva. Exact meron Black Holes in four dimensional SU(2) Einstein-Yang-Mills theory.Phys. Lett. B, 722:364–371, 2013. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.029

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.029 2013
[57]

Exact multisoliton solutions in the four dimensional Skyrme model.Phys

Fabrizio Canfora, Francisco Correa, and Jorge Zanelli. Exact multisoliton solutions in the four dimensional Skyrme model.Phys. Rev. D, 90: 085002, 2014. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.085002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.085002 2014
[58]

Canfora, E

F. Canfora, E. F. Eiroa, and C. M. Sendra. Spherically symmetric black holes with Skyrme hair and their shadows.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78:9, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5476-3

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5476-3 2018
[59]

Ay´ on-Beato, F

E. Ay´ on-Beato, F. Canfora, and J. Zanelli. Analytic self-gravitating Skyrmions, cosmological bounces and AdS wormholes.Phys. Lett. B, 752: 201–205, 2016. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.065

work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.065 2016
[60]

Black hole and black string solutions with Skyrme hair.Phys

Marco Astorino, Fabrizio Canfora, Marcela Lagos, and Aldo Vera. Black hole and black string solutions with Skyrme hair.Phys. Rev. D, 97: 124032, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124032

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124032 2018
[61]

Adkins, Chiara R

Gregory S. Adkins, Chiara R. Nappi, and Edward Witten. Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model.Nucl. Phys. B, 228:552–566, 1983. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(83)90559-X

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90559-x 1983
[62]

Gravitational Field of a Global Monopole.Phys

Manuel Barriola and Alexander Vilenkin. Gravitational Field of a Global Monopole.Phys. Rev. Lett., 63:341–343, 1989. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.341

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.341 1989
[63]

C. V. Vishveshwara. Scattering of gravitational radiation by a Schwarzschild black hole.Nature, 227:936–938, 1970. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/227936a0

1970
[64]

New approach to the quasinormal modes of a black hole.Phys

Valeria Ferrari and Bahram Mashhoon. New approach to the quasinormal modes of a black hole.Phys. Rev. D, 30:295–304, 1984. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.30.295

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.30.295 1984
[65]

Superradiance and stability of the regularized 4D charged Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet black hole.JHEP, 08:105, 2020

Cheng-Yong Zhang, Sheng-Jie Zhang, Peng-Cheng Li, and Minyong Guo. Superradiance and stability of the regularized 4D charged Einstein- Gauss-Bonnet black hole.JHEP, 08:105, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2020)105

work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)105 2020
[66]

Wheeler.Geometrodynamics

John A. Wheeler.Geometrodynamics. Academic Press, New York, 1973

1973
[67]

A. R. Ruffini.Black Holes: Les Astres Occlus. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1973

1973
[68]

W. G. Unruh. Separability of the neutrino equations in a Kerr background.Phys. Rev. Lett., 31:1265–1267, 1973. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.31.1265

1973
[69]

Chandrasekhar

S. Chandrasekhar. The solution of Dirac’s equation in Kerr geometry.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 349:571–575, 1976. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1098/rspa.1976.0090. 26

work page arXiv 1976
[71]

Mashhoon

B. Mashhoon. Stability of charged rotating black holes in the eikonal approximation. In H. Ning, editor,Proc. 3rd Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, pages 599–608, Amsterdam, 1983. North-Holland

1983
[72]

Blome and B

H.-J. Blome and B. Mashhoon. Quasi-normal oscillations of a Schwarzschild black hole.Phys. Lett. A, 110:231–234, 1984. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(84)90058-7

work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90058-7 1984
[73]

Liu and B

H. Liu and B. Mashhoon. On the spectrum of oscillations of a Schwarzschild black hole.Class. Quant. Grav., 13:233–252, 1996. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/13/2/009

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/2/009 1996
[74]

Sai Iyer and Clifford M. Will. Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering.Phys. Rev. D, 35:3621, 1987. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3621

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.3621 1987
[75]

R. A. Konoplya. Quasinormal behavior of the D-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach.Phys. Rev. D, 68: 024018, 2003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024018

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.024018 2003
[76]

R. A. Konoplya. Gravitational quasinormal radiation of higher dimensional black holes.J. Phys. Stud., 8:93–100, 2004

2004
[77]

Matyjasek and M

Jerzy Matyjasek and Michal Opala. Quasinormal modes of black holes: The improved semianalytic approach.Phys. Rev. D, 96:024011, 2017. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024011

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.024011 2017
[78]

R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo. Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations.Class. Quant. Grav., 36:155002, 2019. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab2e25

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2e25 2019
[79]

Cardoso, A

Vitor Cardoso, Alex S. Miranda, Emanuele Berti, Helvi Witek, and Vilson T. Zanchin. Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes.Phys. Rev. D, 79:064016, 2009. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064016 2009
[80]

Schutz and Clifford M

Bernard F. Schutz and Clifford M. Will. Black hole normal modes: a semianalytic approach.Astrophys. J. Lett., 291:L33–L36, 1985. URL https://doi.org/10.1086/184453

work page doi:10.1086/184453 1985
[81]

Sai Iyer and Clifford M. Will. Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1.Phys. Rev. D, 35:3621, 1987. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.35.3621

1987
[82]

Boehmer and Tiberiu Harko

Christian G. Boehmer and Tiberiu Harko. Can dark matter be a Bose-Einstein condensate?Class. Quant. Grav., 23:6479–6491, 2006. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/017

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/017 2006
[83]

Greybody factors of charged dilaton black holes in 2+1 dimensions.Gen

Sharmanthie Fernando. Greybody factors of charged dilaton black holes in 2+1 dimensions.Gen. Rel. Grav., 37:585–604, 2005. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1007/s10714-005-0049-4

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-005-0049-4 2005

Showing first 80 references.