arxiv: 2604.09776 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Visible Neutrino Decay As An Open Quantum System

Joachim Kopp , George A. Parker (JGU Mainz)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exquant-ph

keywords neutrino decayneutrino oscillationsopen quantum systemsLindblad master equationKraus operatorsMajoronnon-unitary evolutionneutrino flavor mixing

0 comments

The pith

Neutrino oscillations combined with decays are fully described using open quantum system methods like Lindblad equations and Kraus operators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a general framework for modeling neutrinos that both oscillate between flavors and decay into lighter states, treating the full system as an open quantum system to handle non-unitary effects. This is needed because decays can be enhanced in models with extra neutrino flavors or new particles like Majorons, creating complicated interferences and multi-step cascades that mix with oscillations. The authors show how to implement this using the Lindblad master equation for differential evolution, plus the Liouvillian superoperator and Kraus operators for direct computation of the evolved state. The operator-based methods avoid integrating differential equations and thus run faster numerically. A reader would care because the approach gives a unified, scalable way to predict observable signals from such decays in experiments.

Core claim

Decays of heavier neutrino mass eigenstates into lighter ones, while very slow in the Standard Model, can be significantly enhanced in scenarios with more than three neutrino flavours, or in models with new ultra-light particles such as Majorons. A full theoretical description is challenging due to the intricate interplay between oscillations and decay, interference between different decay channels, and the possibility of multi-step decay cascades. We develop a fully general description of arbitrarily complex systems of oscillating and decaying neutrinos using methods from the theory of open quantum systems. Notably, we demonstrate how such systems can be implemented using the Lindblad maste

What carries the argument

Application of open quantum system tools (Lindblad master equation, Liouvillian superoperator, and Kraus operators) to the density-matrix evolution of multi-flavor neutrino states, capturing both unitary oscillations and non-unitary decay effects in one formalism.

If this is right

Allows consistent modeling of interference between multiple decay channels and multi-step cascades.
Provides numerically efficient implementations that avoid solving differential equations at each time step.
Extends directly to models with more than three neutrino flavors or new ultra-light mediators.
Preserves information about coherence and off-diagonal density matrix elements during evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same formalism could incorporate matter potentials or other environmental couplings by adding appropriate terms to the Lindblad operators.
It suggests a route to treat neutrino flavor evolution as a quantum information process, with decay acting like a controlled decoherence channel.
Benchmarks against known analytic limits (pure oscillations or pure exponential decay) would quickly validate the implementation for more complex cases.

Load-bearing premise

The interplay of oscillations, decays, interference, and cascades in multi-flavor or Majoron-extended neutrino models can be fully and accurately captured by standard open quantum system formalisms without additional unstated approximations or loss of unitarity.

What would settle it

A direct numerical comparison for a two-flavor neutrino system with decay where the probabilities computed from the Lindblad or Kraus evolution differ from those obtained by solving the exact time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09776 by George A. Parker (JGU Mainz), Joachim Kopp.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the excited state of a two-level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Neutrino decay in a simple toy scenario with three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Neutrino decay in a more realistic picture, with a pure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Neutrino decay in complex scenarios with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Numerical complexity of different algorithms for com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Decays of heavier neutrino mass eigenstates into lighter ones, while very slow in the Standard Model, can be significantly enhanced in scenarios with more than three neutrino flavours, or in models with new ultra-light particles such as Majorons. A full theoretical description is challenging due to the intricate interplay between oscillations and decay, interference between different decay channels, and the possibility of multi-step decay cascades. In this paper, we develop a fully general description of arbitrarily complex systems of oscillating and decaying neutrinos using methods from the theory of open quantum systems. Notably, we demonstrate how such systems can be implemented using the Lindblad master equation, the Liouvillian superoperator, as well as Kraus operators. The last two methods eschew the need for solving a differential equation, thereby showing superior numerical performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a workable open-systems recipe for neutrino oscillations plus visible decays that skips differential equations via Kraus and Liouvillian methods.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors take standard open-quantum-system tools and apply them to arbitrarily complex neutrino systems that both oscillate and decay visibly, including cascades and interference. They show explicit routes through the Lindblad master equation, the Liouvillian superoperator, and Kraus operators, with the last two offering a numerical edge by avoiding time-stepping differential equations altogether. That is the concrete advance over earlier treatments that handled simpler decay-plus-oscillation cases by hand or with more limited approximations. The framework is derived from established theory rather than invented from scratch, and the abstract's claim of generality for multi-flavor or Majoron-extended models looks plausible on its face. Credit is due for spelling out how to implement the maps in a way that keeps the reduced density matrix for the tracked neutrinos. The numerics angle is practical and could matter for future experimental analyses that need to scan large parameter spaces. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags: visible decays mean the daughter neutrinos stay inside the system, so the jump operators or Kraus maps must move probability between mass eigenstates while preserving the off-diagonal terms that generate interference. If the paper only writes down generic dissipators without showing the explicit form for visible channels or checking that positivity and unitarity survive in a two-step cascade, then the claim of full generality rests on an unverified assumption. The abstract does not give those operators, so the full text needs to demonstrate that the construction does not introduce extra damping or secular approximations that erase cascade interference. No circular fitting or invented entities appear in the description. This is a methods paper aimed at neutrino phenomenologists who already work with decay models and need a scalable numerical tool. It is not revolutionary but it is a clean, usable extension of known techniques. I would bring it to a reading group for the implementation details and would cite it if I needed to simulate a specific multi-step visible-decay scenario. It deserves peer review because the core formalism is standard and the numerical claim is testable; a referee can check the explicit maps and the validation against known limits.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a fully general description of arbitrarily complex systems of oscillating and decaying neutrinos (including visible decays, interference, and multi-step cascades) by mapping them onto open quantum system formalisms. It demonstrates implementations via the Lindblad master equation, the Liouvillian superoperator, and Kraus operators, noting that the latter two avoid solving differential equations and offer superior numerical performance.

Significance. If the explicit constructions correctly encode visible decay channels (retaining daughter neutrinos in the reduced density matrix) while preserving off-diagonal coherences and positivity, the framework would provide a systematic, verifiable tool for BSM neutrino models with enhanced decays. The use of three equivalent formalisms for cross-checks and the focus on numerical efficiency are clear strengths.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and implementation sections] Abstract and the section describing the dissipator/Kraus maps: the central claim that standard Lindblad/Liouvillian/Kraus constructions fully capture visible multi-step cascades without extra damping or loss of interference requires explicit jump operators (or Kraus operators) that re-inject daughter neutrinos into the tracked system while maintaining the off-diagonal terms responsible for oscillations. The provided description does not specify these operators, leaving open whether the implementation treats visible decays as irreversible loss (inappropriate here) or applies an unstated secular approximation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for acknowledging the potential utility of the open quantum system framework for BSM neutrino models with enhanced visible decays. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and implementation sections] Abstract and the section describing the dissipator/Kraus maps: the central claim that standard Lindblad/Liouvillian/Kraus constructions fully capture visible multi-step cascades without extra damping or loss of interference requires explicit jump operators (or Kraus operators) that re-inject daughter neutrinos into the tracked system while maintaining the off-diagonal terms responsible for oscillations. The provided description does not specify these operators, leaving open whether the implementation treats visible decays as irreversible loss (inappropriate here) or applies an unstated secular approximation.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript constructs the open quantum system such that all neutrino mass eigenstates participating in the decays (including daughters) are retained in the Hilbert space; visible decays are therefore not modeled as irreversible loss. The Lindblad jump operators are explicitly of the form L_{j←i} = √Γ_{i→j} |ν_j⟩⟨ν_i| (and their Hermitian conjugates), which map parent to daughter states inside the same space. When inserted into the dissipator, these operators generate both population transfer and off-diagonal contributions that preserve the relative phases responsible for oscillations. The full (non-secular) Liouvillian is retained, with no approximation invoked. Multi-step cascades are handled by composing the corresponding Kraus operators, which are products of the individual jump maps. The abstract summarizes the general construction; the implementation sections derive the Lindblad, Liouvillian-superoperator, and Kraus representations from these operators. To make the explicit forms and their action on coherences more transparent, we will add a dedicated subsection containing the concrete jump/Kraus operators for a two-step visible cascade together with a short numerical check confirming coherence preservation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard open-quantum-system formalisms applied to neutrino decay without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a mapping of oscillating and decaying neutrino systems onto independently established open-quantum-system tools (Lindblad master equation, Liouvillian superoperator, Kraus operators). These formalisms pre-exist the present work and are not derived from neutrino-specific data or prior self-citations within the paper. No parameters are fitted to the target observables, no predictions are generated by construction from the same inputs, and the derivation chain consists of explicit implementation steps rather than tautological re-labeling. The abstract and described framework remain self-contained against external benchmarks in quantum mechanics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that neutrino decay and oscillation systems admit a Markovian open quantum system description; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Neutrino systems with decay and oscillation can be modeled as open quantum systems using Lindblad, Liouvillian, or Kraus formalisms
Invoked as the basis for the general description in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5428 in / 1198 out tokens · 46040 ms · 2026-05-10T16:35:22.999541+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Visible Neutrino Decay As An Open Quantum System

INTRODUCTION Among all the unusual properties that neutrinos pos- sess, their decay is perhaps the least studied one. This is not surprising, given that in the Standard Model, the rate for loop-suppressed radiative decays of the form νi →ν j +γis≲10 −42 yr−1 [1–6]. (Here,ν i,ν j denote neutrino mass eigenstates.) νi νj γ W ∓ ℓ± ℓ± However, neutrino decays...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

regeneration

EXISTING RESUL TS ON NEUTRINO DECA Y 2.1. Decay Rates While neutrino decay occurs even in the Standard Model (ν j →ν k +γ), the corresponding rates are too small to be phenomenologically relevant. This changes in the presence of heavier, sterile, neutrinos or in the presence of additional light particles that open up new decay modes. In the following, we ...
[3]

Lindbladian

OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS We now introduce the concepts from the theory of open quantum systems which we will use to reformulate the neutrino oscillation+decay problem. 3.1. T oy Example To set the stage and introduce the basic idea, we con- sider as a toy example theamplitude dampingmodel of an excited state of an atom (|1⟩) decaying to the ground state (|0⟩)...
[4]

Lindblad Approach In this section, we pose the visible neutrino decay sys- tem as an open quantum system, deriving the main re- sults of the present work

NEUTRINO DECA Y AS AN OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS 4.1. Lindblad Approach In this section, we pose the visible neutrino decay sys- tem as an open quantum system, deriving the main re- sults of the present work. Some steps in this direction have been taken in the existing literature by invoking a modified von Neumann equation of the form [58, 59] dρ(E) dt =−i[H(E)...
[5]

We have one unstable neutrino, and we allow for the possibility of helicity-violating decays (see relevant formulae in Section 2.1

or KamLAND [66]. We have one unstable neutrino, and we allow for the possibility of helicity-violating decays (see relevant formulae in Section 2.1. violating decays are allowed. This requires us to track six neutrino species (three neutrino species, three anti- neutrino species) with four possible decay modes. The density matrix in flavour space therefor...
[6]

(48), that is, to decays from a particular initial energy bin,n, to a particular final energy bin,m, withn≥m

Single Decay For a single decay,ν 3 →ν 1, there areN E(NE + 1)/2 Lindblad operators, each corresponding to one block of Eq. (48), that is, to decays from a particular initial energy bin,n, to a particular final energy bin,m, withn≥m. The (m, n) block of each Lindblad operator will have the structure   0 0■ 0 0 0 0 0 0   .(51) (with all other blocks be...
[7]

Dual Decay Consider now multiple decays from a single unstable neutrinoν 3 →ν 2, ν 3 →ν 1. Now, each of theN E(NE + 1)/2 Lindblad operators will have the form   0 0■ 0 0■ 0 0 0   .(56) By similar arguments as in Section 4 4.2 1, the form of the Kraus operators in the absence of oscillations can again be inferred: M(mn) osc 0 (L) =δ nm   1 0 0 0 1 0 ...
[8]

  0■0 0 0 0 0 0 0   .(62) The first matrix drivesν 3 →ν 2 transitions and the sec- ond one drivesν 2 →ν 1 decays

Cascade Decay Consider now a decay chainν 3 →ν 2 →ν 1, for which theN E(NE + 1)/2 pairs of Lindblad operators take the form   0 0 0 0 0■ 0 0 0   .   0■0 0 0 0 0 0 0   .(62) The first matrix drivesν 3 →ν 2 transitions and the sec- ond one drivesν 2 →ν 1 decays. The blocks of the dy- namical mapE(L) now have the structure   ■0 0 0■0 0 0...
[9]

DISCUSSION 50 100 200 300 500 700 Number of energy bins, NE 100 101 102 103 104 105 Wall time [s] O(N3 E) O(N2 E) g = 0.1 L = 50 km Nt = 100 Nν = 3 Lindbladian ODE O(N2.71 E ) Dynamical Map/Kraus O(N2.03 E ) FIG. 6. Numerical complexity of different algorithms for com- puting combined neutrino oscillation+decay probabilities as a function of the number of...
[10]

CONCLUSIONS In summary, we have investigated the theory of neu- trino oscillation and decay. By applying methods from the theory of open quantum systems, we have found that arbitrarily complicated oscillation+decay problems can be tackled with high numerical efficiency, either by solv- ing the Lindblad master equation or by computing a set of Kraus operat...
[11]

Shrock, DecayL 0 →ν lγin gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions, Phys

R. Shrock, DecayL 0 →ν lγin gauge theories of weak and electromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. D9, 743 (1974)

1974
[12]

B. W. Lee and R. E. Shrock, Natural Suppression of Sym- metry Violation in Gauge Theories: Muon - Lepton and Electron Lepton Number Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1444 (1977)

1977
[13]

W. J. Marciano and A. I. Sanda, Exotic Decays of the Muon and Heavy Leptons in Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B67, 303 (1977)

1977
[14]

P. B. Pal and L. Wolfenstein, Radiative Decays of Mas- sive Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D25, 766 (1982)

1982
[15]

R. E. Shrock, Electromagnetic Properties and Decays of Dirac and Majorana Neutrinos in a General Class of Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B206, 359 (1982)

1982
[16]

Xing and S

Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou,Neutrinos in particle physics, astronomy and cosmology, Advanced Topics in Science and Technology in China (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011)

2011
[17]

Chikashige, R

Y. Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra, and R. D. Peccei, Are There Real Goldstone Bosons Associated with Broken Lepton Number?, Phys. Lett. B98, 265 (1981)

1981
[18]

G. B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number, Phys. Lett. B99, 411 (1981)

1981
[19]

J. W. F. Valle, Fast Neutrino Decay in Horizontal Ma- joron Models, Phys. Lett. B131, 87 (1983)

1983
[20]

Y. P. Porto-Silva, S. Prakash, O. L. G. Peres, H. Nunokawa, and H. Minakata, Constraining visible neutrino decay at KamLAND and JUNO, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 999 (2020), arXiv:2002.12134 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

A. D. Dolgov and S. H. Hansen, Massive sterile neutrinos as warm dark matter, Astropart. Phys.16, 339 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0009083

work page arXiv 2002
[22]

Abazajian, G

K. Abazajian, G. M. Fuller, and W. H. Tucker, Direct detection of warm dark matter in the X-ray, Astrophys. J.562, 593 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0106002

work page arXiv 2001
[23]

A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter

M. Dreweset al., A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter, JCAP01, 025, arXiv:1602.04816 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv
[24]

Sterile neutrino Dark Matter,

A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens, and O. Ruchayskiy, Sterile neutrino Dark Matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.104, 1 (2019), arXiv:1807.07938 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

Sterile Neutrinos,

B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Sterile Neutrinos, Phys. Rept. 928, 1 (2021), arXiv:2106.05913 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

R. A. Krivonos, V. V. Barinov, A. A. Mukhin, and D. S. Gorbunov, Strong Limits on keV-Scale Galactic Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Stray Light from NuSTAR after 11 Years of Operation, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 261002 (2024), arXiv:2405.17861 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Abrah˜ ao, H

T. Abrah˜ ao, H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa, and A. A. Quiroga, Constraint on Neutrino Decay with Medium- Baseline Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiments, JHEP11, 001, arXiv:1506.02314 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[28]

Coloma and O

P. Coloma and O. L. G. Peres, Visible neutrino decay at DUNE, (2017), arXiv:1705.03599 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[29]

A. M. Gago, R. A. Gomes, A. L. G. Gomes, J. Jones- Perez, and O. L. G. Peres, Visible neutrino decay in the light of appearance and disappearance long baseline ex- periments, JHEP11, 022, arXiv:1705.03074 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[30]

Choubey, D

S. Choubey, D. Dutta, and D. Pramanik, Invisible neu- trino decay in the light of NOvA and T2K data, JHEP 08, 141, arXiv:1805.01848 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[31]

C. A. Ternes and G. Pagliaroli, Invisible neutrino decay at long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D109, L071701 (2024), arXiv:2401.14316 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Maltoni and W

M. Maltoni and W. Winter, Testing neutrino oscilla- tions plus decay with neutrino telescopes, JHEP07, 064, arXiv:0803.2050 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2050
[33]

Baerwald, M

P. Baerwald, M. Bustamante, and W. Winter, Neutrino Decays over Cosmological Distances and the Implications for Neutrino Telescopes, JCAP10, 020, arXiv:1208.4600 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[34]

P. F. de Salas, S. Pastor, C. A. Ternes, T. Thakore, and M. T´ ortola, Constraining the invisible neutrino decay with KM3NeT-ORCA, Phys. Lett. B789, 472 (2019), arXiv:1810.10916 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[35]

Archidiacono and S

M. Archidiacono and S. Hannestad, Updated constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from Planck, JCAP07, 046, arXiv:1311.3873 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[36]

Escudero and M

M. Escudero and M. Fairbairn, Cosmological Constraints on Invisible Neutrino Decays Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103531 (2019), arXiv:1907.05425 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[37]

Barenboim, J

G. Barenboim, J. Z. Chen, S. Hannestad, I. M. Old- engott, T. Tram, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Invisible neu- trino decay in precision cosmology, JCAP03, 087, arXiv:2011.01502 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2011
[38]

Lindner, T

M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson, and W. Winter, A Combined treatment of neutrino decay and neutrino oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B607, 326 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0103170

work page arXiv 2001
[39]

Abdullahi and P

A. Abdullahi and P. B. Denton, Visible Decay of Astro- physical Neutrinos at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D102, 023018 (2020), arXiv:2005.07200 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

Stankevich, A

K. Stankevich, A. Studenikin, and M. Vyalkov, Gener- alized Lindblad master equation for neutrino evolution, Phys. Rev. D111, 036014 (2025), arXiv:2411.19303 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Stankevich and A

K. Stankevich and A. Studenikin, Neutrino quantum de- coherence engendered by neutrino radiative decay, Phys. Rev. D101, 056004 (2020), arXiv:2002.02621 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

Bernabeu, N

J. Bernabeu, N. E. Mavromatos, and P. Villanueva-Perez, Consistent Probabilistic Description of the Neutral Kaon System: Novel Observable Effects, Phys. Lett. B724, 269 (2013), arXiv:1208.3572 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[43]

Caban, J

P. Caban, J. Rembielinski, K. A. Smolinski, and Z. Wal- czak, Unstable particles as open quantum systems, Phys. 13 Rev. A72, 032106 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0506183

work page arXiv 2005
[44]

R. A. Bertlmann, W. Grimus, and B. C. Hiesmayr, An Open-quantum-system formulation of particle de- cay, Phys. Rev. A73, 054101 (2006), arXiv:quant- ph/0602116

work page arXiv 2006
[45]

Benatti and R

F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Open system approach to neutrino oscillations, JHEP02, 032, arXiv:hep- ph/0002221

work page arXiv
[46]

E. Lisi, A. Marrone, and D. Montanino, Probing possible decoherence effects in atmospheric neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1166 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0002053

work page arXiv 2000
[47]

A. M. Gago, E. M. Santos, W. J. C. Teves, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Quantum dissipative effects and neutrinos: Current constraints and future perspectives, Phys. Rev. D63, 073001 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009222

work page arXiv 2001
[48]

Ohlsson, Equivalence between neutrino oscillations and neutrino decoherence, Phys

T. Ohlsson, Equivalence between neutrino oscillations and neutrino decoherence, Phys. Lett. B502, 159 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012272

work page arXiv 2001
[49]

R. L. N. Oliveira, Dissipative Effect in Long Baseline Neutrino Experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 417 (2016), arXiv:1603.08065 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[50]

J. A. B. Coelho and W. A. Mann, Decoherence, mat- ter effect, and neutrino hierarchy signature in long baseline experiments, Phys. Rev. D96, 093009 (2017), arXiv:1708.05495 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2017
[51]

Coloma, J

P. Coloma, J. Lopez-Pavon, I. Martinez-Soler, and H. Nunokawa, Decoherence in Neutrino Propagation Through Matter, and Bounds from IceCube/DeepCore, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 614 (2018), arXiv:1803.04438 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[52]

J. F. Nieves and S. Sahu, Neutrino decoherence in an elec- tron and nucleon background, Phys. Rev. D102, 056007 (2020), arXiv:2002.08315 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

De Romeri, C

V. De Romeri, C. Giunti, T. Stuttard, and C. A. Ternes, Neutrino oscillation bounds on quantum decoherence, JHEP09, 097, arXiv:2306.14699 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[54]

Akhmedov and A

E. Akhmedov and A. Y. Smirnov, Damping of neutrino oscillations, decoherence and the lengths of neutrino wave packets, JHEP11, 082, arXiv:2208.03736 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[55]

Alexandre, K

J. Alexandre, K. Farakos, N. E. Mavromatos, and P. Pasipoularides, Neutrino oscillations in a stochastic model for space-time foam, Phys. Rev. D77, 105001 (2008), arXiv:0712.1779 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[56]

Neutrino decoherence from quantum gravitational stochastic perturbations,

T. Stuttard and M. Jensen, Neutrino decoherence from quantum gravitational stochastic perturbations, Phys. Rev. D102, 115003 (2020), arXiv:2007.00068 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Kopp and G

J. Kopp and G. A. Parker,nuDICEPython package (2026),https://github.com/george-parker/nuDICE

2026
[58]

C. W. Kim and W. P. Lam, Some remarks on neutrino decay via a Nambu-Goldstone boson, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5, 297 (1990)

1990
[59]

J. M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, D. Hern´ andez, and R. L. N. Oliveira, Non-Unitary Neutrino Propagation From Neutrino Decay, Phys. Lett. B742, 74 (2015), arXiv:1407.6631 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[60]

D. S. Chattopadhyay, K. Chakraborty, A. Dighe, S. Goswami, and S. M. Lakshmi, Neutrino Prop- agation When Mass Eigenstates and Decay Eigen- states Mismatch, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 011802 (2022), arXiv:2111.13128 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[61]

D. S. Chattopadhyay, K. Chakraborty, A. Dighe, and S. Goswami, Analytic treatment of 3-flavor neu- trino oscillation and decay in matter, JHEP01, 051, arXiv:2204.05803 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[62]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems, J. Math. Phys.17, 821 (1976)

1976
[63]

Lindblad, On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups, Commun

G. Lindblad, On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

1976
[64]

T. F. Havel, Robust procedures for converting among Lindblad, Kraus and matrix representations of quantum dynamical semigroups, J. Math. Phys.44, 534 (2003)

2003
[65]

C. J. Wood, J. D. Biamonte, and D. G. Cory, Tensor net- works and graphical calculus for open quantum systems, Quant. Inf. Comput.15, 0759 (2015), arXiv:1111.6950 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[66]

Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

1975
[67]

Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rept

A. Jamio lkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rept. Math. Phys.3, 275 (1972)

1972
[68]

Z. Moss, M. H. Moulai, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, and J. M. Conrad, Exploring a nonminimal sterile neutrino model involving decay at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D97, 055017 (2018), arXiv:1711.05921 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[69]

Decaying Sterile Neutrinos and the Short Baseline Oscillation Anomalies,

M. Dentler, I. Esteban, J. Kopp, and P. Machado, De- caying Sterile Neutrinos and the Short Baseline Oscil- lation Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D101, 115013 (2020), arXiv:1911.01427 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[70]

C. A. A. Delgado, J. Salvado, and C. N. Weaver, A Simple Quantum Integro-Differential Solver (SQuIDS), Comput. Phys. Commun.196, 569 (2015), arXiv:1412.3832 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2015
[71]

C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. Salvado, and C. N. Weaver, nuSQuIDS: A toolbox for neutrino propagation, Comput. Phys. Commun.277, 108346 (2022), arXiv:2112.13804 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[72]

Weckesser,odeintwPython package (2025),https: //github.com/WarrenWeckesser/odeintw

W. Weckesser,odeintwPython package (2025),https: //github.com/WarrenWeckesser/odeintw

2025
[73]

A. C. Hindmarsh, ODEPACK, a systematized collection of ODE solvers, inScientific Computing, edited by R. S. Stepleman (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983) pp. 55–64, https://computing.llnl.gov/projects/odepack

1983
[74]

Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

P. Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

2020
[75]

Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), Prog

A. Abuslemeet al.(JUNO), JUNO physics and de- tector, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.123, 103927 (2022), arXiv:2104.02565 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[76]

Abeet al.(KamLAND), Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND, Phys

S. Abeet al.(KamLAND), Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 221803 (2008), arXiv:0801.4589 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2008
[77]

Wanget al.(JUNO), Damping signatures at JUNO, a medium-baseline reactor neutrino oscillation experiment, JHEP06, 062, arXiv:2112.14450 [hep-ex]

J. Wanget al.(JUNO), Damping signatures at JUNO, a medium-baseline reactor neutrino oscillation experiment, JHEP06, 062, arXiv:2112.14450 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv