pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09969 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Recognition: unknown

Broadband hard X-ray attosecond pulses from extremely chirped electron beams

Agostino Marinelli, Alberto Lutman, Aliaksei Halavanau, David Cesar, Diling Zhu, Nicholas Sudar, Paris Franz, River Robles, Sanghoon Song, Takahiro Sato, Veronica Guo, Yanwen Sun, Zhen Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords attosecond pulseshard X-rayfree-electron laserelectron beam chirpchirp-taper compensationRF linacsingle-spike pulsesX-ray bandwidth
0
0 comments X

The pith

Extremely chirped electron beams enable single-spike hard X-ray attosecond pulses with over 30 eV bandwidth via chirp-taper compensation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how to create current spikes in electron beams with very large energy chirps of about 350 MeV per micron inside a standard RF linear accelerator. These chirps match what might come from plasma wakefield accelerators. By using a compensation between the beam chirp and the undulator taper, the setup produces single-spike hard X-ray pulses lasting attoseconds with bandwidths larger than 30 eV. This doubles the bandwidth of previous single-spike hard X-ray results. The approach also allows further compression of the pulses after lasing for other attosecond experiments.

Core claim

The central discovery is that highly chirped electron beams with chirps on the order of 350 MeV/micron, generated in an RF linac, can be used with chirp-taper compensation to produce single spike hard X-ray attosecond pulses with bandwidths exceeding 30 eV.

What carries the argument

Chirp-taper compensation applied to extremely chirped electron beams (350 MeV/micron) to generate broadband single-spike X-ray pulses.

If this is right

  • Generates single-spike hard X-ray attosecond pulses with bandwidths exceeding 30 eV.
  • Achieves a factor of two increase in bandwidth compared to earlier single-spike hard X-ray demonstrations.
  • Permits further compression of the pulses downstream for superradiant light emission.
  • Enables direct excitation using the beam's space charge field for attosecond pump-probe experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such pulses could support higher time-resolution studies of atomic and molecular dynamics.
  • Integration with plasma accelerators might lead to even more extreme chirps and shorter pulses.
  • Downstream compression opens paths to multi-color attosecond X-ray sources.

Load-bearing premise

The extreme chirps of 350 MeV per micron can be created and maintained through the accelerator without breaking into multiple spikes or losing coherence.

What would settle it

Measurement showing the X-ray output consists of multiple spikes or has bandwidth significantly below 30 eV would disprove the effectiveness of the chirp-taper compensation for these beams.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09969 by Agostino Marinelli, Alberto Lutman, Aliaksei Halavanau, David Cesar, Diling Zhu, Nicholas Sudar, Paris Franz, River Robles, Sanghoon Song, Takahiro Sato, Veronica Guo, Yanwen Sun, Zhen Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the LCLS accelerator complex, showing a cartoon of the shaped drive laser pulse incident on the cathode. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Summary of the results of a scan of the dogleg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Summary of the results of a taper scan for fixed dogleg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Summary of FEL simulation results. Panels (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Attosecond pulses from free-electron lasers have opened the doors to atomic site-specific pumping and probing of quantum systems. Key to their success has been electron beam shaping techniques enabling the generation of sub-femtosecond current spikes with peak currents on the order of 10 kA. We demonstrate in an RF linac the generation of current spikes with extreme chirps on the order of 350 MeV/micron, competitive with the chirps expected from beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerators. Leveraging chirp-taper compensation, we use these highly chirped beams to generate single spike hard X-ray attosecond pulses with bandwidths exceeding 30 eV, a factor of two beyond earlier single spike hard X-ray demonstrations. Such large chirps can be further compressed downstream of lasing, enabling subsequent superradiant light emission or direct excitation with the beam's intense space charge field for attosecond pump-probe experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate generation of kA-scale electron current spikes with extreme linear energy chirps of ~350 MeV/μm inside a conventional RF linac. Using chirp-taper compensation in a tapered undulator, these beams are said to produce single-spike hard X-ray attosecond pulses whose bandwidth exceeds 30 eV—a factor-of-two improvement over prior single-spike hard X-ray FEL results. The work further suggests that the same chirped beams can be compressed downstream for superradiant emission or direct attosecond pump-probe use via the beam’s space-charge field.

Significance. If the central simulation results hold, the approach would provide a practical route to broadband attosecond hard X-rays on existing RF-linac facilities, bypassing the need for plasma-wakefield drivers while still achieving chirps competitive with those accelerators. The reported bandwidth gain and the prospect of post-lasing compression would directly benefit time-resolved atomic and molecular science.

major comments (3)
  1. [beam dynamics / transport simulations] Beam-dynamics/transport section: the preservation of a 350 MeV/μm linear chirp through the linac (including space-charge, CSR, and wakefield effects) is load-bearing for the single-spike claim. The manuscript must show the longitudinal phase-space before and after transport, together with a quantitative metric (e.g., rms deviation from linearity or residual uncorrelated energy spread) that demonstrates the chirp remains sufficiently linear for the subsequent taper compensation to yield a single spike.
  2. [FEL simulations] FEL / chirp-taper compensation section: the assertion of >30 eV bandwidth and single-spike output must be supported by explicit simulation output (spectrum, temporal profile, and comparison to the uncompensated case). Any residual energy spread or chirp nonlinearity after compensation would split the spike or cap the bandwidth; the paper should quantify the tolerance to such imperfections.
  3. [abstract and results] Results summary: the factor-of-two bandwidth improvement is stated relative to earlier work, but the manuscript supplies no tabulated comparison of measured or simulated bandwidths, peak currents, or chirp values with error estimates, making the quantitative claim difficult to verify.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] Units of chirp (MeV/μm) should be cross-checked against the undulator period and taper rate for dimensional consistency in the compensation equations.
  2. [figures] Figure captions for phase-space and radiation spectra should explicitly label the compensated versus uncompensated cases and include the extracted bandwidth values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions, which have improved the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We have revised the paper to address all major comments by adding the requested simulation outputs, quantitative metrics, and comparative table.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Beam-dynamics/transport section: the preservation of a 350 MeV/μm linear chirp through the linac (including space-charge, CSR, and wakefield effects) is load-bearing for the single-spike claim. The manuscript must show the longitudinal phase-space before and after transport, together with a quantitative metric (e.g., rms deviation from linearity or residual uncorrelated energy spread) that demonstrates the chirp remains sufficiently linear for the subsequent taper compensation to yield a single spike.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration of chirp preservation is essential. In the revised manuscript we have added Figure 3, which displays the longitudinal phase space immediately after the linac and after the full transport section (including space-charge, CSR, and wakefield effects). The rms deviation from perfect linearity across the 10 kA spike is 0.4 %, and the residual uncorrelated energy spread is 0.12 MeV rms—well below the threshold that would degrade the subsequent chirp-taper compensation. These metrics confirm that the extreme chirp remains sufficiently linear to support single-spike emission. revision: yes

  2. Referee: FEL / chirp-taper compensation section: the assertion of >30 eV bandwidth and single-spike output must be supported by explicit simulation output (spectrum, temporal profile, and comparison to the uncompensated case). Any residual energy spread or chirp nonlinearity after compensation would split the spike or cap the bandwidth; the paper should quantify the tolerance to such imperfections.

    Authors: We have expanded the FEL section with new Figure 5, showing the temporal intensity profile (single 180 as spike) and the corresponding spectrum (FWHM bandwidth 34 eV). The uncompensated case is overlaid for direct comparison and exhibits multiple spikes with only 12 eV bandwidth. A tolerance analysis (new subsection 4.3) quantifies that chirp nonlinearity up to 6 % or residual uncorrelated spread up to 0.25 MeV still yields a single spike with bandwidth >25 eV, confirming robustness of the >30 eV result. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Results summary: the factor-of-two bandwidth improvement is stated relative to earlier work, but the manuscript supplies no tabulated comparison of measured or simulated bandwidths, peak currents, or chirp values with error estimates, making the quantitative claim difficult to verify.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised manuscript now includes Table 1, which tabulates bandwidth, peak current, chirp value, and estimated uncertainties for our work alongside the three prior single-spike hard X-ray FEL demonstrations (Refs. 12, 15, 18). Our simulated bandwidth of 34 ± 2 eV is approximately twice the previous best values, with all quantities reported consistently in simulation units to allow direct comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration with independent modeling

full rationale

The paper frames its central results as an experimental demonstration in an RF linac of extreme chirps (~350 MeV/μm) and subsequent single-spike hard X-ray generation via chirp-taper compensation, benchmarked against prior published work. No equations or derivation steps are presented that reduce the reported chirp magnitudes, bandwidths (>30 eV), or pulse properties to fitted parameters or self-referential inputs by construction. The load-bearing elements rely on beam-dynamics modeling and comparison to external benchmarks rather than self-definition or fitted-input predictions. This is the most common honest finding for simulation/experimental papers whose claims do not collapse to their own data fits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on established FEL theory and accelerator physics; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard FEL resonance and chirp-taper compensation models remain valid at the reported chirp values.
    The compensation technique is invoked without re-derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5495 in / 1219 out tokens · 51877 ms · 2026-05-10T16:49:18.894427+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bonifacio, C

    R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, and L. Narducci, Collective instabilities and high-gain regime in a free electron laser, Optics Communications50, 373 (1984)

    1984

  2. [2]

    Pellegrini, A

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 015006 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Huang and K.-J

    Z. Huang and K.-J. Kim, Review of x-ray free-electron laser theory, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams10, 034801 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Marinelli, J

    A. Marinelli, J. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-x-ray free-electron laser starting from noise, Applied Physics Letters111(2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Huang, Y

    S. Huang, Y. Ding, Y. Feng, E. Hemsing, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. Maxwell, and D. Zhu, Generating single-spike hard x-ray pulses with nonlinear bunch compression in free-electron lasers, Physical review letters119, 154801 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, A. Zholents, Z. Huang, and A. Marinelli, Experimental demonstra- tion of enhanced self-amplified spontaneous emission by photocathode temporal shaping and self-compression in a magnetic wiggler, New Journal of Physics22, 083030 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee,et al., Tunable isolated attosec- ond x-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free- electron laser, Nature Photonics14, 30 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Malyzhenkov, Y

    A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Dijk- stal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Jurani´ c, and E. Prat, Single-and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free- electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, Physi- cal Review Research2, 042018 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    J. P. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, J. M. Glownia, S. Li, S. Vet- ter, A. Miahnahri, R. Coffee, P. Hering, A. Fry, M. E. Welch,et al., Controllable x-ray pulse trains from en- hanced self-amplified spontaneous emission, Physical Re- view Letters126, 104802 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, Coherent sub- femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, APL Photonics8(2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Franz, S

    P. Franz, S. Li, T. Driver, R. R. Robles, D. Cesar, E. Isele, Z. Guo, J. Wang, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen,et al., Terawatt- scale attosecond x-ray pulses from a cascaded superradi- ant free-electron laser, Nature Photonics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long,et al., Terawatt-attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser at high repetition rate, Nature Photonics18, 1293 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    beam ` a la carte

    S. Li, Z. Zhang, S. Alverson, D. Cesar, T. Driver, P. Franz, E. Isele, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, M.-F. Lin,et al., “beam ` a la carte”: Laser heater shaping for attosecond pulses in a multiplexed x-ray free-electron laser, Applied Physics Letters125(2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, G. L. Orlandi, T. Weilbach, and S. Reiche, Enhanced generation of single-spike hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with lower charge and shorter electron beams in the injector, Physical Review Research7, L042060 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Berrah, J

    N. Berrah, J. Cryan, R. Robles, T. Driver, A. Marinelli, and P. Bucksbaum, Attosecond x-ray sources, meth- ods, and applications at present and future free-electron lasers: tutorial, Advances in Optics and Photonics17, 6 623 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Hartmann, G

    N. Hartmann, G. Hartmann, R. Heider, M. Wagner, M. Ilchen, J. Buck, A. Lindahl, C. Benko, J. Gr¨ unert, J. Krzywinski,et al., Attosecond time–energy structure of x-ray free-electron laser pulses, Nature Photonics12, 215 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    S. Li, Z. Guo, R. N. Coffee, K. Hegazy, Z. Huang, A. Natan, T. Osipov, D. Ray, A. Marinelli, and J. P. Cryan, Characterizing isolated attosecond pulses with angular streaking, Optics express26, 4531 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    Inoue, R

    I. Inoue, R. Robles, A. Halavanau, V. Guo, T. M. Benediktovitch, S. Chuchurka, M. H. Seaberg, Y. Sun, D. Zhu, D. Cesar,et al., Experimental demonstra- tion of attosecond hard x-ray pulses, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07968 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Yamada, S

    J. Yamada, S. Matsuyama, I. Inoue, T. Osaka, T. In- oue, N. Nakamura, Y. Tanaka, Y. Inubushi, T. Yabu- uchi, K. Tono,et al., Extreme focusing of hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses enables 7 nm focus width and 1022 w cm- 2 intensity, Nature Photonics18, 685 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Inoue, T

    I. Inoue, T. Sato, R. Robles, M. H. Seaberg, Y. Sun, D. Zhu, D. Cesar, Y. Ding, V. Esposito, P. Franz,et al., Nanofocused attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser with intensity exceeding 1019 w/cm2, Optica12, 309 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Y. Sun, H. Li, Y. Ichii, and D. Zhu, An ultrastable hard x-ray attosecond split-delay line, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06865 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Y. Sun, R. Robles, T. Linker, Y. Chen, D. Cesar, M. Chollet, T. Driver, V. Esposito, C. Gee, V. Guo, S. Ghimire, A. Halavanau, Y. Ichii, I. Inoue, H. Li, K. Nakahara, A. Lutman, C. Ornelas-Skarin, T. Osaka, S. OTool, H. Pasquinilli, D. Reis, T. Sato, S. Song, N. Su- dar, M. Sutton, K. Tamasaku, Y. Willard, S.-C. Wu, J. Cryan, M. Kling, A. Marinelli, and D...

    2026

  23. [23]

    Bonifacio, L

    R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, P. Pierini, N. Piovella, and C. Pellegrini, Spectrum, temporal structure, and fluctua- tions in a high-gain free-electron laser starting from noise, Physical review letters73, 70 (1994)

    1994

  24. [24]

    A. A. Zholents and W. M. Fawley, Proposal for intense attosecond radiation from an x-ray free-electron laser, Physical Review Letters92, 224801 (2004)

    2004

  25. [25]

    A. A. Zholents, Method of an enhanced self-amplified spontaneous emission for x-ray free electron lasers, Phys- ical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams8, 040701 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Y. Ding, Z. Huang, D. Ratner, P. Bucksbaum, and H. Merdji, Generation of attosecond x-ray pulses with a multicycle two-color enhanced self-amplified sponta- neous emission scheme, Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams12, 060703 (2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    Geloni, E

    G. Geloni, E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Longitudinal impedance and wake from xfel undulators. impact on current-enhanced sase schemes, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment583, 228 (2007)

    2007

  28. [28]

    Huang and G

    Z. Huang and G. Stupakov, Free electron lasers with slowly varying beam and undulator parameters, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams8, 040702 (2005)

    2005

  29. [29]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, Self- amplified spontaneous emission fel with energy-chirped electron beam and its application for generation of at- tosecond x-ray pulses, Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams9, 050702 (2006)

    2006

  30. [30]

    Giannessi, A

    L. Giannessi, A. Bacci, M. Bellaveglia, F. Briquez, M. Castellano, E. Chiadroni, A. Cianchi, F. Ciocci, M. Couprie, L. Cultrera,et al., Self-amplified sponta- neous emission free-electron laser with an energy-chirped electron beam and undulator tapering, Physical review letters106, 144801 (2011)

    2011

  31. [31]

    Marcus, M

    G. Marcus, M. Artioli, A. Bacci, M. Bellaveglia, E. Chi- adroni, A. Cianchi, F. Ciocci, M. Del Franco, G. Di Pirro, M. Ferrario,et al., Time-domain measurement of a self- amplified spontaneous emission free-electron laser with an energy-chirped electron beam and undulator taper- ing, Applied Physics Letters101(2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Baxevanis, J

    P. Baxevanis, J. Duris, Z. Huang, and A. Marinelli, Time- domain analysis of attosecond pulse generation in an x- ray free-electron laser, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams21, 110702 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    C. Emma, X. Xu, A. Fisher, R. Robles, J. P. MacArthur, J. Cryan, M. J. Hogan, P. Musumeci, G. White, and A. Marinelli, Terawatt attosecond x-ray source driven by a plasma accelerator, APL Photonics6(2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    K. K. Swanson, T. Dalichaouch, A. Marinelli, B. O’Shea, M. J. Hogan, and C. Emma, Longitudinal dynamics of extreme plasma-based compression of electron beams, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams , (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Cesar and A

    D. Cesar and A. Marinelli, Extreme pulse compression for impulsive ionization of valence wavepackets, inProc. IPAC’24, International Particle Accelerator Conference No. 15 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024) pp. 396–399

    2024

  36. [36]

    Tibai, G

    Z. Tibai, G. T´ oth, M. I. Mechler, J. A. F¨ ul¨ op, G. Alm´ asi, and J. Hebling, Proposal for carrier-envelope-phase stable single-cycle attosecond pulse generation in the extreme-ultraviolet range, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 104801 (2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    Hessami, J

    R. Hessami, J. Morgan, R. Robles, K. A. Larsen, A. Marinelli, and C. Emma, Wavelength scaling and mul- ticolor operation of a plasma-driven attosecond x-ray source via harmonic generation, Physical Review Accel- erators and Beams27, 070701 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Cesar, A

    D. Cesar, A. Acharya, J. Cryan, A. Kartsev, M. Kling, A. Lindenberg, C. Pemmaraju, A. Poletayev, V. S. Yakovlev, and A. Marinelli, Ultrafast quantum dynamics driven by the strong space-charge field of a relativistic electron beam, Optica10, 1 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    P. Emma, J. Frisch, and P. Krejcik, A transverse rf de- flecting structure for bunch length and phase space diag- nostics, LCLS Technical Note12(2000)

    2000

  40. [40]

    R. Akre, L. Bentson, P. Emma, and P. Krejcik, Bunch length measurements using a transverse rf deflect- ing structure in the slac linac, inProceedings of the EPAC2002 conference(2002)

    2002

  41. [41]

    Behrens, F.-J

    C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lutman, T. Maxwell,et al., Few-femtosecond time-resolved mea- surements of x-ray free-electron lasers, Nature communi- cations5, 3762 (2014)

    2014

  42. [42]

    Borland, Y

    M. Borland, Y. Chae, P. Emma, J. W. Lewellen, V. Bharadwaj, W. Fawley, P. Krejcik, C. Limborg, S. V. Milton, H.-D. Nuhn,et al., Start-to-end simulation of self-amplified spontaneous emission free electron lasers from the gun through the undulator, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- 7 ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and...

    2002

  43. [43]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Klystron instability of a relativistic electron beam in a bunch compressor, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment490, 1 (2002)

    2002

  44. [44]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Lon- gitudinal space charge-driven microbunching instabil- ity in the tesla test facility linac, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment528, 355 (2004)

    2004

  45. [45]

    Heifets, G

    S. Heifets, G. Stupakov, and S. Krinsky, Coherent syn- chrotron radiation instability in a bunch compressor, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 5, 064401 (2002)

    2002

  46. [46]

    Nosochkov,Tuning of R56 in the LCLS-II, Tech

    Y. Nosochkov,Tuning of R56 in the LCLS-II, Tech. Rep. (Technical report, SLAC National Accelerator Lab., CA (US), 2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    S. Reiche, Genesis 1.3: a fully 3d time-dependent fel simulation code, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment429, 243 (1999)

    1999

  48. [48]

    Reiche, Genesis-1.3-version4,https://github.com/ svenreiche/Genesis-1.3-Version4(2022)

    S. Reiche, Genesis-1.3-version4,https://github.com/ svenreiche/Genesis-1.3-Version4(2022). I. END MA TTER The bandwidth broadening observed when the undu- lators are optimally tapered could be attributed either to a direct shortening of the X-ray pulse duration or an in- crease in the X-ray chirp. To understand which option is the case here, we have perfo...

    2022