arxiv: 2604.10536 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · physics.class-ph

Recognition: unknown

Heat Conduction in Momentum-Conserving Fluids: From quasi-2D to 3D systems

Rongxiang Luo , Jiaqi Wen , Juncheng Guo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech physics.class-ph

keywords heat conductionmomentum-conserving fluidsdimensional crossoverhydrodynamic regimethermal conductivitymolecular dynamicsmesoscopic fluidsautocorrelation function

0 comments

The pith

Momentum-conserving fluids show heat conductivity diverging logarithmically in quasi-2D but remaining finite in 3D.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper simulates a mesoscopic fluid that conserves momentum to track how heat flows as the system changes from nearly flat to fully three-dimensional. It separates the behavior into ballistic, kinetic, and hydrodynamic regimes and shows that only the last one produces a clear difference by dimension. In the hydrodynamic regime the simulations find that conductivity grows with the logarithm of system size in quasi-two dimensions while it saturates in three dimensions, exactly as scaling theory predicts. This crossover matters because it explains why heat transport can look anomalous in thin layers yet normal in bulk fluids.

Core claim

Nonequilibrium and equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations with multiparticle collision dynamics identify three transport regimes across quasi-2D to 3D systems. In the hydrodynamic regime the quasi-2D case exhibits logarithmically divergent thermal conductivity together with a heat-current autocorrelation that decays as 1/t, while the 3D case shows finite conductivity and an autocorrelation decaying as t to the minus 3/2. These scalings quantitatively match theoretical predictions and establish a dimensional crossover from 2D-like anomalous transport to 3D Fourier behavior.

What carries the argument

The hydrodynamic regime scalings of thermal conductivity with system size and the associated decay of the heat current autocorrelation function, which differ by dimensionality in momentum-conserving fluids.

If this is right

Quasi-2D momentum-conserving systems display anomalous heat transport driven by long-lived hydrodynamic correlations.
Three-dimensional systems recover normal Fourier conduction with size-independent conductivity.
The same model reproduces both the ballistic and kinetic regimes before the hydrodynamic crossover appears.
These dimensional differences provide guidance for thermal design in micro- and nanoscale devices that span thin layers to bulk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Real colloidal or granular fluids that conserve momentum could be used to test the predicted logarithmic growth directly.
The crossover may help explain why some thin-film materials show size-dependent heat flow while thicker samples do not.
Extending the same simulation approach to other conserved quantities could reveal analogous dimensional transitions in momentum or particle transport.

Load-bearing premise

The multiparticle collision dynamics model and the chosen system sizes are large enough to reach the true hydrodynamic regime without finite-size artifacts or model biases that would change the observed scalings.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that thermal conductivity remains finite with increasing system size in a quasi-2D momentum-conserving fluid, or diverges in a three-dimensional one, would contradict the claimed crossover.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10536 by Jiaqi Wen, Juncheng Guo, Rongxiang Luo.

read the original abstract

Using nonequilibrium and equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate heat conduction in a momentum-conserving mesoscopic fluid modeled by multiparticle collision dynamics. Across quasi-two-dimensional (q-2D) to three-dimensional (3D) systems, we identify three distinct transport regimes: (i) a \emph{ballistic regime}, where thermal conductivity scales linearly with system size ($\kappa \sim L$) and the total heat current autocorrelation function $C(t)$ remains constant; (ii)~a \emph{kinetic regime}, characterized by size-independent $\kappa$ and exponentially decaying $C(t)$, demonstrating that normal heat conduction dominated by kinetic effects is far more ubiquitous than previously observed in 1D systems; and (iii)~a \emph{hydrodynamic regime}, where the q-2D system exhibits logarithmically divergent conductivity ($ \kappa \sim \ln L $ ) with $ C(t) \sim t^{-1} $ , while the 3D system displays finite $ \kappa $ and $ C(t) \sim t^{-3/2} $. Our results, observed in the hydrodynamic regime, quantitatively validate the scaling predictions for heat transport and reveal a clear dimensional crossover -- from 2D-like anomalous transport to 3D Fourier behavior. These results lay a foundation for understanding thermal transport in q-2D to 3D systems and have practical implications for the design of micro- and nanoscale thermal devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The MPCD simulations map out ballistic, kinetic, and hydrodynamic regimes for heat transport and show the expected q-2D log divergence crossing over to finite 3D conductivity, but the claim that the hydrodynamic regime is cleanly reached rests on unshown checks against the model's microscopic scales.

read the letter

The paper runs nonequilibrium and equilibrium MPCD simulations on momentum-conserving fluids to track how heat conduction changes from quasi-2D to 3D. It reports three regimes: ballistic (κ ~ L, flat C(t)), kinetic (size-independent κ, exponential C(t) decay), and hydrodynamic (κ ~ ln L with C(t) ~ t^{-1} in q-2D; finite κ with C(t) ~ t^{-3/2} in 3D). The kinetic regime is presented as more common than earlier 1D work suggested, and the dimensional crossover is shown directly with correlation exponents that line up with hydrodynamic theory.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses nonequilibrium and equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations with the multiparticle collision dynamics (MPCD) model to study heat conduction in momentum-conserving fluids, spanning quasi-2D to 3D systems. It identifies three regimes—ballistic (κ ∼ L, constant C(t)), kinetic (size-independent κ, exponential C(t) decay), and hydrodynamic (κ ∼ ln L with C(t) ∼ t^{-1} in q-2D; finite κ with C(t) ∼ t^{-3/2} in 3D)—and claims that the hydrodynamic-regime results quantitatively validate theoretical scaling predictions while demonstrating a dimensional crossover from anomalous to normal (Fourier) transport.

Significance. If the hydrodynamic regime is rigorously established and the reported scalings hold without model-specific or finite-size artifacts, the work would supply useful numerical evidence supporting analytic predictions for low-dimensional anomalous heat transport and the 2D-to-3D crossover. The MPCD approach enables larger-scale simulations than fully atomistic MD, which is a methodological strength for accessing hydrodynamic behavior; the independent simulation tests of prior predictions (rather than self-referential derivations) add credibility.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and hydrodynamic-regime identification] Abstract and hydrodynamic-regime results: the central claim that the simulations 'quantitatively validate' the scalings (κ ∼ ln L and C(t) ∼ t^{-1} in q-2D; finite κ and C(t) ∼ t^{-3/2} in 3D) rests on the unverified assumption that the largest simulated L lies deep inside the true hydrodynamic limit. No explicit checks—such as data collapse versus L/ℓ_mfp, variation of MPCD collision frequency or mean-free path, or demonstration that viscous lengths are exceeded—are described, leaving open the possibility that the reported behaviors remain contaminated by kinetic-regime remnants or model cutoffs.
[Methods and regime-classification sections] Methods and regime-classification sections: the criteria used to demarcate the kinetic-to-hydrodynamic crossover (e.g., system-size thresholds, parameter independence tests, or goodness-of-fit metrics for the logarithmic versus constant κ) are not supplied with sufficient quantitative detail, including error bars, fitting ranges, or robustness against MPCD parameter changes; this directly undermines the load-bearing assertion that the observed dimensional crossover is asymptotic rather than an intermediate-window artifact.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract asserts 'quantitative validation' without referencing the specific fitting procedures or statistical controls that appear later; a brief cross-reference would improve clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate the MPCD parameters (collision frequency, particle density) and the range of L values used for each regime to allow readers to assess hydrodynamic convergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the methodological strengths of the MPCD approach and the independent validation of theoretical predictions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation of the hydrodynamic regime and regime classification.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and hydrodynamic-regime identification] Abstract and hydrodynamic-regime results: the central claim that the simulations 'quantitatively validate' the scalings (κ ∼ ln L and C(t) ∼ t^{-1} in q-2D; finite κ and C(t) ∼ t^{-3/2} in 3D) rests on the unverified assumption that the largest simulated L lies deep inside the true hydrodynamic limit. No explicit checks—such as data collapse versus L/ℓ_mfp, variation of MPCD collision frequency or mean-free path, or demonstration that viscous lengths are exceeded—are described, leaving open the possibility that the reported behaviors remain contaminated by kinetic-regime remnants or model cutoffs.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification that the largest systems lie deep within the hydrodynamic regime is essential to support the quantitative validation claim. Our current identification is based on the emergence of the expected theoretical scalings (logarithmic in q-2D, finite in 3D) together with the corresponding current autocorrelation decays, which are inconsistent with kinetic-regime behavior. However, we acknowledge that additional checks would eliminate any ambiguity regarding possible crossover artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) conductivity data plotted against L/ℓ_mfp to demonstrate collapse or saturation in the hydrodynamic window, (ii) results obtained by varying the MPCD collision frequency (and thus the mean free path) while keeping other parameters fixed, and (iii) estimates showing that the simulated lengths exceed the relevant viscous hydrodynamic lengths. These additions will directly address the concern of kinetic contamination. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods and regime-classification sections] Methods and regime-classification sections: the criteria used to demarcate the kinetic-to-hydrodynamic crossover (e.g., system-size thresholds, parameter independence tests, or goodness-of-fit metrics for the logarithmic versus constant κ) are not supplied with sufficient quantitative detail, including error bars, fitting ranges, or robustness against MPCD parameter changes; this directly undermines the load-bearing assertion that the observed dimensional crossover is asymptotic rather than an intermediate-window artifact.

Authors: We accept that the demarcation criteria require more quantitative detail. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods and Results sections to specify (i) the precise system-size thresholds at which each regime is identified, (ii) error bars on all conductivity values and on the fitted slopes (logarithmic or constant), (iii) the exact fitting ranges used to distinguish κ ∼ ln L from size-independent κ, and (iv) additional robustness tests performed by changing the MPCD collision rule parameters. These quantitative elements will make the regime classification reproducible and will strengthen the evidence that the observed 2D-to-3D crossover is not an intermediate-size artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulations test external hydrodynamic predictions

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct nonequilibrium and equilibrium MPCD simulations that measure conductivity scalings (κ ∼ L ballistic, size-independent kinetic, κ ∼ ln L or finite in hydrodynamic) and C(t) decays. These are presented as numerical observations that quantitatively match independent theoretical scaling predictions for momentum-conserving fluids, rather than being derived from the simulation outputs themselves or from self-citations. No equations reduce fitted parameters to predictions by construction, no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' prior work, and regime identification rests on observed behaviors rather than self-referential definitions. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced or detailed in the abstract; the study relies on standard molecular dynamics techniques applied to an established mesoscopic fluid model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 1104 out tokens · 24348 ms · 2026-05-10T15:53:21.035533+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

1), the scaling j ∼ L− 1 (or size-independent κ) is observed only in the 3D system. As the system ap- proaches the q-2D case, the thermal current ultimately 3 /s61 /s32 /s73 /s110/s116 /s101 /s103 /s114 /s97 /s98/s108 /s101 /s32/s99 /s97 /s115 /s101 /s49/s48 /s49 /s49/s48 /s50 /s49/s48 /s51 /s49/s48 /s45 /s50 /s49/s48 /s45 /s49 /s49/s48 /s48 /s61 /s32/s48...
[2]

Lepri, ed., From Statistical Physics to Nanoscale Heat Transfer, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

S. Lepri, ed., From Statistical Physics to Nanoscale Heat Transfer, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 921 (Springer, New York, 2016)

2016
[3]

Zhang, Y

Z. Zhang, Y. Ouyang, Y. Cheng, J. Chen, N. Li, and G. Zhang, Size-dependent phononic thermal transport in low-dimensional nanomaterials, Physics Reports 860, 1 (2020)

2020
[4]

Benenti, G

G. Benenti, G. Casati, K. Saito, and R. Whitney, Funda- mental aspects of steady-state conversion of heat to work at the nanoscale, Physics Reports 694, 1 (2017)

2017
[5]

N. Li, J. Ren, L. Wang, G. Zhang, P. H¨ anggi, and B. Li, Colloquium: Phononics: Manipulating heat ﬂow with electronic analogs and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1045 (2012)

2012
[6]

X. Gu, Y. Wei, X. Yin, B. Li, and R. Yang, Colloquium: Phononic thermal properties of two-dimensional materi- als, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 041002 (2018)

2018
[7]

J. Chen, X. Xu, J. Zhou, and B. Li, Interfacial thermal resistance: Past, present, and future, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025002 (2022)

2022
[8]

Lepri, R

S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Heat conduction in chain s of nonlinear oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1896 (1997)

1997
[9]

Dhar, Heat conduction in a one-dimensional gas of elastically colliding particles of unequal masses, Phys

A. Dhar, Heat conduction in a one-dimensional gas of elastically colliding particles of unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3554 (2001)

2001
[10]

Narayan and S

O. Narayan and S. Ramaswamy, Anomalous heat conduc- tion in one-dimensional momentum-conserving systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200601 (2002)

2002
[11]

Casati and T

G. Casati and T. c. v. Prosen, Anomalous heat conduc- tion in a one-dimensional ideal gas, Phys. Rev. E 67, 5 015203 (2003)

2003
[12]

Li and J

B. Li and J. Wang, Anomalous heat conduction and anomalous diﬀusion in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 044301 (2003)

2003
[13]

Denisov, J

S. Denisov, J. Klafter, and M. Urbakh, Dynamical heat channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 194301 (2003)

2003
[14]

Cipriani, S

P. Cipriani, S. Denisov, and A. Politi, From anomalous energy diﬀusion to levy walks and heat conductivity in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 244301 (2005)

2005
[15]

Delﬁni, S

L. Delﬁni, S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Anoma- lous kinetics and transport from 1d self-consistent mode- coupling theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P02007 (2007)

2007
[16]

Wang and T

L. Wang and T. Wang, Power-law divergent heat conduc- tivity in one-dimensional momentum-conserving nonlin- ear lattices, Europhysics Letters 93, 54002 (2011)

2011
[17]

van Beijeren, Exact results for anomalous transport in one-dimensional hamiltonian systems, Phys

H. van Beijeren, Exact results for anomalous transport in one-dimensional hamiltonian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 180601 (2012)

2012
[18]

Spohn, Nonlinear ﬂuctuating hydrodynamics for an- harmonic chains, Journal of Statistical Physics 154, 1191 (2014)

H. Spohn, Nonlinear ﬂuctuating hydrodynamics for an- harmonic chains, Journal of Statistical Physics 154, 1191 (2014)

2014
[19]

P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Garrido, A violation of universal - ity in anomalous fourier’s law, Scientiﬁc Reports 6, 38823 (2016)

2016
[20]

Hai-Bin and L

L. Hai-Bin and L. Zhen, Anomalous energy diﬀusion and heat conduction in one-dimensional system, Chinese Physics B 19, 054401 (2010)

2010
[21]

Lepri, R

S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, On the anomalous ther- mal conductivity of one-dimensional lattices, Europhysics Letters 43, 271 (1998)

1998
[22]

Basile, C

G. Basile, C. Bernardin, and S. Olla, Momentum con- serving model with anomalous thermal conductivity in low dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 204303 (2006)

2006
[23]

Luo and S

R. Luo and S. Lepri, Multi-particle-collision simulat ion of heat transfer in low-dimensional ﬂuids, Entropy 27, 10.3390/e27050455 (2025)

work page doi:10.3390/e27050455 2025
[24]

L. Wang, D. He, and B. Hu, Heat conduction in a three- dimensional momentum-conserving anharmonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 160601 (2010)

2010
[25]

Saito and A

K. Saito and A. Dhar, Heat conduction in a three dimen- sional anharmonic crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040601 (2010)

2010
[26]

L. Yang, P. Grassberger, and B. Hu, Dimensional crossover of heat conduction in low dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 74, 062101 (2006)

2006
[27]

Luo, Heat conduction in two-dimensional momentum- conserving and -nonconserving gases, Phys

R. Luo, Heat conduction in two-dimensional momentum- conserving and -nonconserving gases, Phys. Rev. E 102, 052104 (2020)

2020
[28]

Hisamoto, Y

K. Hisamoto, Y. Kobayashi, T. Ikeda, and M. Yamakawa, Dimensional crossover of thermal transport in oligomer aqueous solutions: From three-dimensional to quasi-one- dimensional behavior, Phys. Rev. E 112, 055414 (2025)

2025
[29]

L. Dong, Q. Xi, D. Chen, J. Guo, T. Nakayama, Y. Li, Z. Liang, J. Zhou, X. Xu, and B. Li, Dimensional crossover of heat conduction in amor- phous polyimide nanoﬁbers, National Science Review 5, 500 (2018) , https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article- pdf/5/4/500/31568240/nwy004.pdf

2018
[30]

Giardin` a, R

C. Giardin` a, R. Livi, A. Politi, and M. Vassalli, Finit e thermal conductivity in 1d lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2144 (2000)

2000
[31]

O. V. Gendelman and A. V. Savin, Normal heat conduc- tivity of the one-dimensional lattice with periodic poten- tial of nearest-neighbor interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2381 (2000)

2000
[32]

Zhong, Y

Y. Zhong, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Zhao, Normal heat conduction in one-dimensional momentum conserv- ing lattices with asymmetric interactions, Phys. Rev. E 85, 060102 (2012)

2012
[33]

Z. Yi, Z. Yong, W. Jiao, and Z. Hong, Normal thermal conduction in lattice models with asymmetric harmonic interparticle interactions, Chinese Physics B 22, 070505 (2013)

2013
[34]

S. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Zhao, Key role of asymmetric interactions in low-dimensional heat trans- port, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment 2016, 033205 (2016)

2016
[35]

A. V. Savin and Y. A. Kosevich, Thermal conductivity of molecular chains with asymmetric potentials of pair interactions, Phys. Rev. E 89, 032102 (2014)

2014
[36]

S. Chen, J. Wang, G. Casati, and G. Benenti, Noninte- grability and the fourier heat conduction law, Phys. Rev. E 90, 032134 (2014)

2014
[37]

Chen, Q.-Y

H. Chen, Q.-Y. Zhang, J. Wang, N. Li, and J. Chen, Normal energy and stretch diﬀusion in a one-dimensional momentum conserving lattice with nonlinear bounded ki- netic energy, Chinese Physics B 34, 094401 (2025)

2025
[38]

Zhao and W.-g

H. Zhao and W.-g. Wang, Fourier heat conduction as a strong kinetic eﬀect in one-dimensional hard-core gases, Phys. Rev. E 97, 010103 (2018)

2018
[39]

W. Fu, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhao, From near-integrable to far-from-integrable: A uniﬁed picture of thermalization and heat transport, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 013314 (2026)

2026
[40]

L. Wang, B. Hu, and B. Li, Validity of fourier’s law in one-dimensional momentum-conserving lattices with asymmetric interparticle interactions, Phys. Rev. E 88, 052112 (2013)

2013
[41]

S. G. Das, A. Dhar, and O. Narayan, Heat conduction in the fermi-pasta-ulam chain, Journal of Statistical Physics 154, 204 (2014)

2014
[42]

Miron, J

A. Miron, J. Cividini, A. Kundu, and D. Mukamel, Derivation of ﬂuctuating hydrodynamics and crossover from diﬀusive to anomalous transport in a hard-particle gas, Phys. Rev. E 99, 012124 (2019)

2019
[43]

Lepri, R

S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Too close to inte- grable: Crossover from normal to anomalous heat dif- fusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040604 (2020)

2020
[44]

Malevanets and R

A. Malevanets and R. Kapral, Mesoscopic model for sol- vent dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics 110, 8605 (1999)

1999
[45]

Gompper, T

G. Gompper, T. Ihle, D. M. Kroll, and R. G. Win- kler, Multi-particle collision dynamics: A particle-base d mesoscale simulation approach to the hydrodynamics of complex ﬂuids, in Advanced Computer Simulation Ap- proaches for Soft Matter Sciences III , edited by C. Holm and K. Kremer (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2009) pp. 1–87

2009
[46]

J. T. Padding and A. A. Louis, Hydrodynamic inter- actions and brownian forces in colloidal suspensions: Coarse-graining over time and length scales, Phys. Rev. E 74, 031402 (2006)

2006
[47]

Belushkin, R

M. Belushkin, R. Livi, and G. Foﬃ, Hydrodynamics and the ﬂuctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210601 (2011). 6

2011
[48]

Benenti, G

G. Benenti, G. Casati, and C. Mej ´ ıa-Monasterio, Ther- moelectric eﬃciency in momentum-conserving systems, New Journal of Physics 16, 015014 (2014)

2014
[49]

R. Luo, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and J. Wang, Thermo- dynamic bound on heat-to-power conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080602 (2018)

2018
[50]

R. Luo, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and J. Wang, Onsager reciprocal relations with broken time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022009 (2020)

2020
[51]

R. Luo, Q. Zhang, G. Lin, and S. Lepri, Heat conduc- tion in low-dimensional electron gases without and with a magnetic ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014116 (2025)

2025
[52]

J. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, Transport properties of the Lorentz gas: Fourier’s law, Journal of Statistical Physics 19, 633 (1978)

1978
[53]

Tehver, F

R. Tehver, F. Toigo, J. Koplik, and J. R. Banavar, Ther- mal walls in computer simulations, Phys. Rev. E 57, R17 (1998)

1998
[54]

Ihle and D

T. Ihle and D. M. Kroll, Stochastic rotation dynamics: A galilean-invariant mesoscopic model for ﬂuid ﬂow, Phys. Rev. E 63, 020201 (2001)

2001
[55]

Luo, Negative diﬀerential thermal resistance in one - dimensional hard-point gas models, Phys

R. Luo, Negative diﬀerential thermal resistance in one - dimensional hard-point gas models, Phys. Rev. E 99, 032138 (2019)

2019
[56]

R. Luo, J. Guo, J. Zhang, and H. Yang, Negative diﬀer- ential thermal resistance of ﬂuids induced by heat baths, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043184 (2022)

2022
[57]

R. Luo, L. Huang, and S. Lepri, Heat conduction in a three-dimensional momentum-conserving ﬂuid, Phys. Rev. E 103, L050102 (2021)

2021
[58]

R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics , 2nd ed., Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 31 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991)

1991
[59]

Lepri, R

S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Thermal conduction in classical low-dimensional lattices, Physics Reports 377, 1 (2003)

2003
[60]

Dhar, Heat transport in low-dimensional systems, Ad- vances in Physics 57, 457 (2008)

A. Dhar, Heat transport in low-dimensional systems, Ad- vances in Physics 57, 457 (2008)

2008
[61]

Zhao, Identifying diﬀusion processes in one- dimensional lattices in thermal equilibrium, Phys

H. Zhao, Identifying diﬀusion processes in one- dimensional lattices in thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 140602 (2006)

2006
[62]

S. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Zhao, Finite-size eﬀects on current correlation functions, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022111 (2014)

2014
[63]

Lepri, R

S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Anomalous trans- port in the fermi-pasta-ulam-tsingou model: a review and open problems, (2026), arXiv:2602.15512 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2026