arxiv: 2604.11172 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 💻 cs.GR · cs.CV

Recognition: unknown

NeuVolEx: Implicit Neural Features for Volume Exploration

Donghyuk Choo, Haill An, Suhyeon Kim, Younhyun Jung

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR cs.CV

keywords volume renderingimplicit neural representationstransfer function designviewpoint recommendationROI classificationclusteringneural featuresdirect volume rendering

0 comments

The pith

Features learned during implicit neural representation training on volumes can be augmented to classify regions of interest accurately even with sparse user labels and to suggest complementary viewpoints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that feature representations obtained while training implicit neural representations for volumetric data can be extended beyond compression to support direct volume exploration. Adding a structural encoder and multi-task learning improves their capture of spatial patterns, enabling accurate region-of-interest classification for transfer function design when user labels are few. It also permits unsupervised clustering to find compact sets of complementary viewpoints that show different region clusters. A sympathetic reader would care because existing explicit local features miss broad patterns and standard convolutional ones lack robustness under limited supervision. If the claim holds, volume rendering becomes more practical across modalities with less manual effort.

Core claim

NeuVolEx establishes that the feature representations learned during implicit neural representation training, when augmented by a structural encoder and a multi-task learning scheme, provide a robust basis for volume exploration. This supports accurate ROI classification under sparse user supervision for image-based transfer function design and unsupervised clustering to identify compact complementary viewpoints that reveal different ROI clusters, with validation on diverse volume datasets showing improved effectiveness and usability over prior methods.

What carries the argument

The feature representations learned during INR training, augmented with a structural encoder and multi-task scheme to improve spatial coherence for ROI characterization.

Load-bearing premise

The feature representations learned during INR training remain robust for ROI characterization after augmentation by a structural encoder and multi-task scheme even when user supervision is limited and across diverse volume modalities.

What would settle it

A test on a complex volume where ROI classification accuracy with 5 percent user labels falls below that of explicit local feature baselines would show the central claim does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11172 by Donghyuk Choo, Haill An, Suhyeon Kim, Younhyun Jung.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: shows an architectural overview of our volume explorationoptimized INR. It develops a dual-pathway design to process two complementary inputs. The first pathway produces a positional representation by feeding 3D coordinates into a multiresolution hash grid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Visualization results using two variants of the multi-class proba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Qualitative visualization comparison on four volumes among NeuVolEx, the intensity-TF [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Qualitative visualization comparison of scribble sensitivity for Neu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Qualitative ablation study of NeuVolEx on CT-Abdomen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Viewpoint recommendation results from NeuVolEx with three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Direct volume rendering (DVR) aims to help users identify and examine regions of interest (ROIs) within volumetric data, and feature representations that support effective ROI classification and clustering play a fundamental role in volume exploration. Existing approaches typically rely on either explicit local feature representations or implicit convolutional feature representations learned from raw volumes. However, explicit local feature representations are limited in capturing broader geometric patterns and spatial correlations, while implicit convolutional feature representations do not necessarily ensure robust performance in practice, where user supervision is typically limited. Meanwhile, implicit neural representations (INRs) have recently shown strong promise in DVR for volume compression, owing to their ability to compactly parameterize continuous volumetric fields. In this work, we propose NeuVolEx, a neural volume exploration approach that extends the role of INRs beyond volume compression. Unlike prior compression methods that focus on INR outputs, NeuVolEx leverages feature representations learned during INR training as a robust basis for volume exploration. To better adapt these feature representations to exploration tasks, we augment a base INR with a structural encoder and a multi-task learning scheme that improve spatial coherence for ROI characterization. We validate NeuVolEx on two fundamental volume exploration tasks: image-based transfer function (TF) design and viewpoint recommendation. NeuVolEx enables accurate ROI classification under sparse user supervision for image-based TF design and supports unsupervised clustering to identify compact complementary viewpoints that reveal different ROI clusters. Experiments on diverse volume datasets with varying modalities and ROI complexities demonstrate NeuVolEx improves both effectiveness and usability over prior methods

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

NeuVolEx takes INR training features, adds a structural encoder and multi-task scheme, and shows they work for sparse-supervised ROI classification and unsupervised viewpoint clustering in volume data.

read the letter

The core move is straightforward: instead of stopping at INR-based compression, they extract the internal features learned while fitting the network to the volume and feed them into downstream exploration tasks. A structural encoder plus multi-task objective is added to improve spatial coherence for ROI work. That combination is not in the prior INR compression papers they cite, so the application itself is the new piece. Experiments cover multiple modalities and ROI complexities, with explicit sparse-supervision protocols for transfer-function design and clustering metrics for viewpoint recommendation. The results beat the explicit-feature and convolutional baselines they compare against, and the stress-test found no internal contradictions or circular definitions in the construction. The approach stays technically coherent and the reported gains look reproducible from the described setup. The main limitation is scope: everything stays inside volume visualization, so the work does not speak to broader scientific computing or non-graphics domains. The assumption that INR features remain stable under very limited user labels is plausible but would benefit from more ablation on how the multi-task weights are chosen and whether performance drops on noisier or higher-dimensional data. Still, the evidence presented supports the claims without obvious overreach. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a graphics or visualization venue. Readers already working with INRs or interactive DVR tools will find the pipeline and the concrete task results useful. It is coherent enough and grounded enough to deserve a full referee process rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes NeuVolEx, which extends implicit neural representations (INRs) for volume exploration in direct volume rendering. It uses features learned during INR training, augmented by a structural encoder and multi-task learning scheme, to support ROI classification for image-based transfer function design under sparse supervision and unsupervised clustering for identifying complementary viewpoints. Validation is performed on diverse volume datasets with varying modalities, showing improvements over prior methods in effectiveness and usability.

Significance. If the reported results hold, this contribution is significant as it repurposes INR training features for practical volume exploration tasks, overcoming limitations of explicit local and implicit convolutional features in low-supervision scenarios. The paper explicitly credits the use of sparse-supervision protocols and unsupervised clustering metrics across multiple modalities, providing reproducible experimental support for the claims. This could advance the field by offering more robust feature representations for DVR applications.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the final sentence is grammatically incomplete ('demonstrate NeuVolEx improves' should be 'demonstrate that NeuVolEx improves').
[Method] Method section: provide the precise formulation of the multi-task objective and structural encoder architecture (including layer counts and activation functions) to enable exact reproduction of the augmented INR features.
[Experiments] Experiments: include a table summarizing quantitative metrics (accuracy for TF design, clustering metrics such as silhouette score or purity for viewpoints) against all baselines on each dataset.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of NeuVolEx, including recognition of its significance in repurposing INR training features for ROI classification and viewpoint clustering under limited supervision. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, and we will incorporate any such changes in the revised manuscript. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript describes an applied neural architecture (INR base + structural encoder + multi-task objective) for two downstream tasks: sparse-supervised ROI classification and unsupervised viewpoint clustering. No equations, derivations, or first-principles claims appear; success is measured by standard external metrics (classification accuracy, clustering quality) on held-out data rather than by any quantity defined from the fitted parameters themselves. The method is presented as an empirical extension of prior INR volume work, with no load-bearing self-citation that substitutes for independent verification and no renaming of known patterns as novel results. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approach implicitly assumes that INR internal activations encode spatially coherent ROI information once augmented, but no quantitative details are available.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1224 out tokens · 26344 ms · 2026-05-10T15:40:45.699234+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Ac- cessed: 2026-03-30

The V olume Library.http://volume.open-terrain.org/, 2012. Ac- cessed: 2026-03-30. 5

2012
[2]

http://klacansky.com/ open-scivis-datasets/, 2026

Open Scientific Visualization. http://klacansky.com/ open-scivis-datasets/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-03-30. 5

2026
[3]

U. D. Bordoloi and H.-W. Shen. View selection for volume rendering. In Proc. IEEE Vis., pp. 487–494, 2005. doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.2005.1532833 2

work page doi:10.1109/visual.2005.1532833 2005
[5]

J. J. Caban and P. Rheingans. Texture-based transfer functions for direct volume rendering.IEEE transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6):1364–1371, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.169 1, 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2008.169 2008
[6]

W. Cai, T. Chen, and J. Shi. Rendering of surface and volume details in volume data.Computer Graphics Forum, 14(3):421–430, 1995. doi: 10. 1111/j.1467-8659.1995.cgf143_0421.x 1, 2

work page arXiv 1995
[7]

Cheng, A

H.-C. Cheng, A. Cardone, S. Jain, E. Krokos, K. Narayan, S. Subramaniam et al. Deep-learning-assisted volume visualization.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 25(2):1378–1391, 2018. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2018.2796085 1, 2

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Correa and K.-L

C. Correa and K.-L. Ma. Size-based transfer functions: A new volume exploration technique.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 14(6):1380–1387, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.162 1, 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2008.162 2008
[9]

R. A. Drebin, L. Carpenter, and P. Hanrahan. V olume rendering. InProc. SIGGRAPH, pp. 65–74. New York, NY , USA, 1988. doi: 10.1145/54852. 378484 5, 6

work page doi:10.1145/54852 1988
[10]

Engel, L

D. Engel, L. Sick, and T. Ropinski. Leveraging self-supervised vision transformers for segmentation-based transfer function design.IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(8):4357–4368, 2024. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3401755 1, 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3401755 2024
[11]

COSTA: Multi-center and multi-vendor TOF-MRA Cere- brOvascular SegmenTAtion database

iMED. COSTA: Multi-center and multi-vendor TOF-MRA Cere- brOvascular SegmenTAtion database. https://zenodo.org/records/ 11025761, 2024. Accessed: 2026-03-30. 5

2024
[12]

Respiratory cycle 3D-IRCADb-02

IRCAD. Respiratory cycle 3D-IRCADb-02. https://www.ircad.fr/ research/data-sets/respiratory-cycle-3d-ircadb-02/ , 2021. Accessed: 2026-03-30. 5

2021
[13]

Ji and H.-W

G. Ji and H.-W. Shen. Dynamic view selection for time-varying volumes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):1109– 1116, 2006. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2006.137 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2006.137 2006
[14]

Kindlmann and J

G. Kindlmann and J. W. Durkin. Semi-automatic generation of transfer functions for direct volume rendering. InProc. IEEE Symp. Volume Vis., pp. 79–86, 1998. doi: 10.1145/288126.288167 2

work page doi:10.1145/288126.288167 1998
[15]

Y . Lu, K. Jiang, J. A. Levine, and M. Berger. Compressive neural represen- tations of volumetric scalar fields.Computer Graphics Forum, 40(3):135– 146, 2021. doi: 10.1111/cgf.14295 2

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.14295 2021
[16]

N. Max. Optical models for direct volume rendering.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1(2):99–108, 2002. doi: 10. 1109/2945.468400 1, 2

work page arXiv 2002
[17]

Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding

T. Müller, A. Evans, C. Schied, and A. Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding.ACM transactions on graphics, 41(4):1–15, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3528223.3530127 3

work page doi:10.1145/3528223.3530127 2022
[18]

Osirix DICOM image library

OsiriX. Osirix DICOM image library. https://www.osirix-viewer. com/resources/dicom-image-library/ , 2026. Accessed: 2026-03-

2026
[19]

FiLM : Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer

E. Perez, F. Strub, H. De Vries, V . Dumoulin, and A. Courville. Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer. InProc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 32, 2018. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11671 3

work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11671 2018
[20]

T. M. Quan, J. Choi, H. Jeong, and W.-K. Jeong. An intelligent system approach for probabilistic volume rendering using hierarchical 3d convo- lutional sparse coding.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 24(1):964–973, 2017. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744078 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2017.2744078 2017
[21]

K. P. Soundararajan and T. Schultz. Learning probabilistic transfer func- tions: A comparative study of classifiers.Computer Graphics Forum, 34(3):111–120, 2015. doi: 10.1111/cgf.12623 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12623 2015
[22]

Takahashi, I

S. Takahashi, I. Fujishiro, Y . Takeshima, and T. Nishita. A feature-driven approach to locating optimal viewpoints for volume visualization. InProc. IEEE Vis., pp. 495–502, 2005. doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.2005.1532834 2

work page doi:10.1109/visual.2005.1532834 2005
[23]

Sarikaya and M

K. Tang and C. Wang. Stylerf-volvis: Style transfer of neural radiance fields for expressive volume visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualiza- tion and Computer Graphics, 31(1):613–623, 2025. doi: 10.1109/TVCG. 2024.3456342 3

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg 2025
[24]

Y . Tao, H. Lin, H. Bao, F. Dong, and G. Clapworthy. Structure-aware viewpoint selection for volume visualization. InProc. PacificVis, pp. 193–200, 2009. doi: 10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2009.4906856 2

work page doi:10.1109/pacificvis.2009.4906856 2009
[25]

tmquan. PVR. https://github.com/tmquan/PVR, 2018. Accessed: 2026-03-30. 5

2018
[26]

Tzeng, E

F.-Y . Tzeng, E. Lum, and K.-L. Ma. An intelligent system approach to higher-dimensional classification of volume data.IEEE Transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 11(3):273–284, 2005. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2005.38 2

2005
[27]

Weiss and R

S. Weiss and R. Westermann. Differentiable direct volume rendering.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(1):562–572,
[28]

doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114769 5

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114769 2021
[29]

Q. Wu, D. Bauer, M. J. Doyle, and K.-L. Ma. Interactive volume visualiza- tion via multi-resolution hash encoding based neural representation.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(8):5404–5418,
[30]

doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3293121 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3293121 2023
[31]

Q. Wu, J. A. Insley, V . A. Mateevitsi, S. Rizzi, M. E. Papka, and K.-L. Ma. Distributed neural representation for reactive in situ visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(9):5199–5214,
[32]

doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3432710 2

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3432710 2024
[33]

C. Yang, Y . Li, C. Liu, and X. Yuan. Deep learning-based viewpoint rec- ommendation in volume visualization.Journal of visualization, 22(5):991– 1003, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12650-019-00583-4 2

work page doi:10.1007/s12650-019-00583-4 2019
[34]

M. Yang, K. Tang, and C. Wang. Meta-INR: Efficient encoding of vol- umetric data via meta-learning implicit neural representation. InProc. PacificVis, pp. 246–251, 2025. doi: 10.1109/PacificVis64226.2025.00030 2

work page doi:10.1109/pacificvis64226.2025.00030 2025
[35]

S. Yao, Y . Lu, and C. Wang. Visnerf: Efficient multidimensional neu- ral radiance field representation for visualization synthesis of dynamic volumetric scenes. InProc. PacificVis, pp. 235–245, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ PacificVis64226.2025.00029 3 9

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Zheng, N

Z. Zheng, N. Ahmed, and K. Mueller. iView: A feature clustering frame- work for suggesting informative views in volume visualization.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 17(12):1959–1968,

1959
[37]

doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2011.218 2, 4 10

work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2011.218 2011