pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11526 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🧮 math.SP

Recognition: unknown

Spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the Helmholtz equation

Denis S. Grebenkov, Iosif Polterovich, Michael Levitin

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.SP
keywords Dirichlet-to-Neumann mapHelmholtz equationSteklov problemspectral asymptoticseigenvalue inequalitiesnodal domainseigenfunctions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the Helmholtz equation exhibits eigenvalue inequalities, asymptotics, and eigenfunction features that differ from the Laplace case once the parameter is nonzero.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey examines the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map when the underlying equation is changed from Laplace to Helmholtz. It collects how the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions vary with the nonzero Helmholtz parameter and identifies distinctions that appear only in that setting. A reader would care because these distinctions appear in wave-based models used in acoustics and inverse problems. The paper assembles inequalities, asymptotic formulas in different regimes, and observations on nodal domains while noting numerical difficulties that arise.

Core claim

When the Helmholtz parameter is nonzero, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues satisfy new inequalities, their asymptotic distribution changes across regimes, and the associated eigenfunctions display nodal-domain and other properties absent from the zero-parameter Laplace case.

What carries the argument

The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator associated to the Helmholtz equation, which maps boundary Dirichlet data to the corresponding Neumann data for solutions satisfying the Helmholtz relation inside the domain.

If this is right

  • Eigenvalue bounds must now account for the Helmholtz parameter rather than following Steklov-type estimates alone.
  • Spectral asymptotics split into regimes whose leading terms depend on the size of the parameter relative to the eigenvalue index.
  • Nodal domains of the eigenfunctions can no longer be described by the same rules that apply when the parameter vanishes.
  • Applications involving wave propagation inside bounded domains require parameter-aware versions of the map.
  • Numerical schemes for computing the spectrum must incorporate the parameter to avoid convergence issues that appear only when it is nonzero.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The parameter dependence may open routes to frequency-tuned inverse problems that recover domain geometry from measured Dirichlet-to-Neumann data at chosen frequencies.
  • The phenomena described for smooth domains suggest testing whether analogous distinctions survive on domains with corners or fractal boundaries.
  • Links to scattering resonances in exterior problems could be explored by viewing the interior Helmholtz parameter as a probe of interior wave behavior.
  • Specialized numerical methods that exploit the explicit parameter dependence might reduce computational cost compared with treating each frequency separately.

Load-bearing premise

The distinctions in spectral properties hold for the smooth bounded domains and boundary conditions treated in the surveyed literature without further restrictions that would make the differences uniform over all such domains.

What would settle it

A high-accuracy numerical computation of the first several Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues and eigenfunctions on the unit disk for a small positive Helmholtz parameter that reproduces exactly the same inequalities and nodal counts known for the Laplace case would falsify the claimed new phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11526 by Denis S. Grebenkov, Iosif Polterovich, Michael Levitin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examples of non-Lipschitz domains, in which the Lipschitz condition is not satisfied at the point shown. From left to right: a disk with a cut; a planar domain with an external cusp; a planar domain with an internal cusp. §2.2. The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map Let, as above, Ω ⊂ R 𝑑 , 𝑑 ≥ 2, be a bounded Lipschitz domain. In what follows, we use the theory of Sobolev spaces 𝐻 𝑠 (Ω), 𝐻 𝑠 0 (Ω), and 𝐻 𝑠 (𝜕Ω), 𝑠 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Eigenvalues of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map DΛ for the interval − 1 2 , 1 2  as functions of Λ. Secondly, we have 𝜎 (Λ) s ≈ 𝜎 (Λ) a ≈ √ −Λ as Λ → −∞. Thirdly, note that on each interval of continuity  𝜆 Dir ℵ,𝑚−1 (I1), 𝜆Dir ℵ,𝑚 (I1)  , 𝑚 ∈ N (with account of (3.3) if 𝑚 = 1), of the function 𝑓ℵ(Λ), this function is monotone decreasing from +∞ to −∞, and therefore has an inverse which we denote by 𝑓 −1 ℵ,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Eigenvalues of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map DΛ for the unit disk as functions ofΛ. The eigenvalue with 𝑚 = 0 is simple, all the others are double, except at the intersection points. The thin vertical lines indicate the positions of the Dirichlet eigenvalues. Remark 3.1. Note that the expression (3.5) for 𝜎 (Λ) (𝑚) is invalid when √ Λequals the 𝑘th positive zero 𝑗𝑚,𝑘 of the Bessel function 𝐽𝑚. This happens … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Some eigenvalues 𝜎 (Λ) , plotted as functions of Λ, for the square of side 𝜋. The dashed curves correspond to simple eigenvalues, and the solid curves to the double ones, except at the points of intersection. The thin vertical lines indicate the positions of the Dirichlet eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An example of two analytic eigenvalue branches for the rectangle 𝑄( 𝜋 2 , 27𝜋 16 ) intersecting at Λ ≈ −0.65. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Some bulk eigenfunctions for the kiteK. Top row, left to right,Λ = −5: the eigenfunctions 𝑈 (−5) 2 corresponding to the eigenvalue 𝜎 (−5) 2 ≈ 1.743, and 𝑈 (−5) 6 corresponding to the eigenvalue 𝜎 (−5) 6 ≈ 2.740. Bottom row, left to right, Λ = 5 ∈ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A crossing (left) versus an avoided crossing (right). We additionally have Proposition 4.4. Let Ω ⊂ R 𝑑 be a bounded Lipschitz domain, let Λ0 ∉ Spec −Δ Dir , and let us fix 𝑘 ∈ N. If 𝜎 (Λ0 ) 𝑘 is a simple eigenvalue of DΛ0 , then d𝜎 (Λ) 𝑘 dΛ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: An illustration of domain monotonicity and non-monotonicity. §4.4. Isoperimetic inequalities for eigenvalues Isoperimetric inequalities for Laplace and Steklov eigenvalues have been actively studied in spectral geometry over more than a hundred years, see [Levitin et al 2023, Chapters 5, 7] and references therein. Rather little is known in this direction for eigenvalues of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A typical geometry of the sloshing problem in dimension 𝑑 = 2. Considering small oscillations of the fluid due to gravity, and assuming that the surface tension on the free surface Γ is negligible, one deduces that the velocity potential 𝑈 satisfies the mixed Steklov–Neumann eigenvalue problem    Δ𝑈 = 0 in Ω, 𝜕𝑛𝑈 = 𝜎𝑈 on Γ, 𝜕𝑛𝑈 = 0 onW. (8.1) The spectrum of (8.1) is discrete, 0 = 𝜎1 < 𝜎2 ≤ . . . … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Domain monotonicity for the case of mixed boundary conditions: three bounded do￾mains 𝐷0 ⊂ 𝐷1 ⊂ 𝐷2 and two bounded domains Ω1 := 𝐷1\𝐷0 and Ω2 := 𝐷2\𝐷0, Ω1 ⊂ Ω2. We impose the Steklov condition on Γ and either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary condition on 𝜕𝐷𝑖 . Then the eigenvalues 𝜎 (Λ) Γ,𝑘 (Ω𝑖) of the partial Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator DΓ,Λ satisfy the following do￾main monotonicity properties, see [Bañu… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The absolute value of 𝜎 (Λ) (0) plotted as a function of complexΛ(top). The images of circles of a given radius under the map Λ ↦→ 𝜎 (Λ) (0) (bottom left), and their zoom near the origin (bottom right). elliptic differential operators was developed in [Andreev and Todorov 2004]. Other modifications and im￾provements include a virtual element method in planar domains [Mora et al 2015], a two-grid discretis… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: An example of a domain decomposition the partial Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps DΛ,Γ𝑗 on Γ𝑗 with respect to an unbounded domain Ω𝑗 and subject to the boundary conditions on 𝜕Ω𝑗 \ Γ𝑗 and at infinity inherited from the original problem. This is typically done by separation of variables. Then, using elliptic regularity, we reformulate the original spectral problem as    −Δ𝑈 = Λ𝑈 in Ω0, B𝑈 = 0 on 𝜕Ω0 \ … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The study of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map and the associated Steklov problem for the Laplace equation has been a central topic in spectral geometry over the past decade. In this survey, we consider a more general framework in which the Laplace equation is replaced by the Helmholtz equation. We examine how the properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenvalues and eigenfunctions depend on the parameter in the Helmholtz equation and describe new phenomena arising when this parameter is nonzero, as opposed to the Laplace case. In particular, we present various eigenvalue inequalities, analyse spectral asymptotics in different regimes, and investigate nodal domains and other features of eigenfunctions. We also discuss applications where the Helmholtz parameter plays an essential role, as well as challenges encountered in the numerical computation of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey that reviews spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the Helmholtz equation. It examines the dependence of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions on the Helmholtz parameter, contrasts these with the Laplace (Steklov) case, presents eigenvalue inequalities, analyzes spectral asymptotics in various regimes, studies nodal domains and other eigenfunction features, and discusses applications and numerical challenges.

Significance. As a survey synthesizing results from the cited literature, the paper provides a structured overview of parameter-dependent phenomena in the Helmholtz DtN spectrum that are absent in the Laplace setting. This organization could help researchers identify distinctions relevant to inverse problems and numerical spectral methods. The work appropriately attributes theorems to prior sources and focuses on comparative analysis rather than new derivations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Introduction (and abstract): the central descriptive claim that 'new phenomena' arise for nonzero Helmholtz parameter (as opposed to the Laplace case) is presented without specifying or citing uniform hypotheses on the domain and boundary conditions that would ensure these distinctions hold robustly for all smooth bounded domains in the referenced literature. This assumption of generality is load-bearing for the survey's main contribution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'various eigenvalue inequalities' is vague; a short parenthetical list or reference to the specific inequalities discussed in later sections would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the survey and for the constructive comment on the introduction. We address the point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction] Introduction (and abstract): the central descriptive claim that 'new phenomena' arise for nonzero Helmholtz parameter (as opposed to the Laplace case) is presented without specifying or citing uniform hypotheses on the domain and boundary conditions that would ensure these distinctions hold robustly for all smooth bounded domains in the referenced literature. This assumption of generality is load-bearing for the survey's main contribution.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the standing hypotheses strengthens the survey. The results synthesized in the manuscript are drawn from the cited literature, each of which assumes a bounded domain Ω ⊂ ℝ^d with smooth boundary ∂Ω (typically C^∞ or C^{2,α}). Under these conditions the new phenomena (parameter-dependent eigenvalue crossings, sign-changing eigenfunctions for certain regimes, and the associated nodal-domain behavior) are established in the referenced works. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph early in the introduction (and a corresponding sentence in the abstract) that states: 'Throughout the survey we assume Ω is a smooth bounded domain in ℝ^d with smooth boundary; all cited theorems hold under these hypotheses.' We will also insert a short remark noting that the distinctions with the Laplace case are robust precisely for this class of domains, with pointers to the relevant sections of the cited papers where the assumptions are verified. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: survey summarizing external literature

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a survey that organizes and extends results from the cited literature on the Dirichlet-to-Neumann spectrum, first for the Laplace equation and then for the Helmholtz case. No original derivation chain is presented whose steps reduce by construction to inputs defined inside the paper, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations whose validity is assumed rather than independently established. Eigenvalue inequalities, asymptotics, and nodal-domain statements are attributed to prior works; the paper's descriptive claims about parameter dependence therefore remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The survey relies on standard elliptic regularity and spectral theory for the Helmholtz operator on bounded domains with smooth boundary; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map for the Helmholtz equation is well-defined and self-adjoint on suitable Sobolev spaces for smooth bounded domains.
    Invoked implicitly when discussing eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5432 in / 1229 out tokens · 54035 ms · 2026-05-10T16:18:35.381431+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Geometric bounds for Steklov and weighted Neumann eigenvalues on Euclidean domains

    math.SP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Sharp upper bounds are obtained for the first two nonzero Steklov eigenvalues in dimensions d >= 7 under volume-boundary normalization, derived from optimal weighted Neumann characterizations, plus strict bounds for h...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

209 extracted references · 183 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces. Pure and Applied Mathematics (Amsterdam) 140. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003

    2003

  2. [2]

    M. S. Agranovich, On a mixed Poincar\'e--Steklov type spectral problem in a Lipschitz domain. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 13 (2006), 239--244. 10.1134/S1061920806030010

    work page doi:10.1134/s1061920806030010 2006

  3. [3]

    M. S. Agranovich, Spectral problems in Lipschitz domains. J. Math. Sci. 190 (2013), 8--33. 10.1007/s10958-013-1244-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10958-013-1244-6 2013

  4. [4]

    M. S. Agranovich, B. Z. Katsenelenbaum, A. N. Sivov, and N. N. Voitovich, Generalized method of eigenoscillations in diffraction theory . Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    Akhmetgaliyev, C.-Y

    E. Akhmetgaliyev, C.-Y. Kao, and B. Osting, Computational methods for extremal Steklov problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2017), 1226--1240. 10.1137/16M1067263

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1067263 2017

  6. [6]

    Alessandrini and R

    G. Alessandrini and R. Magnanini, Elliptic equations in divergence form, geometric critical points of solutions, and Stekloff eigenfunctions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 25:5 (1994), 1259--1268. 10.1137/S0036141093249080

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036141093249080 1994

  7. [7]

    C. J. S. Alves and P. R. S. Antunes, The method of fundamental solutions applied to the calculation of eigensolutions for 2D plates. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 77 (2009), 177--194. 10.1002/nme.2404

    work page doi:10.1002/nme.2404 2009

  8. [8]

    C. J. S. Alves and P. R. S. Antunes, The method of fundamental solutions applied to some inverse eigenproblems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2013), A1689--A1708. 10.1137/110860380

    work page doi:10.1137/110860380 2013

  9. [9]

    Ammari, K

    H. Ammari, K. Imeri, and N. Nigam, Optimization of Steklov--Neumann eigenvalues. J. Comput. Phys. 406 (2020), 109211. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109211

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109211 2020

  10. [10]

    A. B. Andreev and T. D. Todorov, Isoparametric finite-element approximation of a Steklov eigenvalue problem. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 24 (2004), 309--322. 10.1093/imanum/24.2.309

    work page doi:10.1093/imanum/24.2.309 2004

  11. [11]

    P. R. S. Antunes, Numerical calculation of eigensolutions of 3D shapes using the method of fundamental solutions. Numer. Methods Partial Diff. Eq. 27 (2011), 1525--1550. 10.1002/num.20609

    work page doi:10.1002/num.20609 2011

  12. [12]

    Arendt and A

    W. Arendt and A. F. M. ter Elst, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on rough domains. J. Diff. Eq. 251 (2011), 2100--2124. 10.1016/j.jde.2011.06.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2011.06.017 2011

  13. [13]

    Arendt and A

    W. Arendt and A. F. M. ter Elst, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on exterior domains. Potential Anal. 43 (2015), 313--340. 10.1007/s11118-015-9473-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11118-015-9473-6 2015

  14. [14]

    Arendt and R

    W. Arendt and R. Mazzeo, Spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on Lipschitz domains. Ulmer Seminare 12 (2007), 23--37. Available at Ulm https://www.uni-ulm.de/fileadmin/website_uni_ulm/mawi.inst.020/arendt/downloads/2009-03-05/a-2008-mazzeo.pdf

    2007

  15. [15]

    Arendt and R

    W. Arendt and R. Mazzeo, Friedlander's eigenvalue inequalities and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann semigroup. Comm. Pure Appl. Anal. 11 (2012), 2201--2212. 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.2201

    work page doi:10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.2201 2012

  16. [16]

    Arendt, A

    W. Arendt, A. F. M. ter Elst, J. B. Kennedy, and M. Sauter, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator via hidden compactness. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 1757--1786. 10.1016/j.jfa.2013.09.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.09.012 2014

  17. [17]

    Arendt, A

    W. Arendt, A. F. M. ter Elst, and M. Warma, Fractional powers of sectorial operators via the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 43 (2018), 1--24. 10.1080/03605302.2017.1363229

    work page doi:10.1080/03605302.2017.1363229 2018

  18. [18]

    Arendt, A

    W. Arendt, A. F. M. ter Elst, and J. Gl\"uck, Strict positivity for the principal eigenfunction of elliptic operators with various boundary conditions. Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 20:3 (2020), 633--650. 10.1515/ans-2020-2091

    work page doi:10.1515/ans-2020-2091 2020

  19. [19]

    Auchmuty, Steklov eigenproblems and the representation of solutions of elliptic boundary value problems

    G. Auchmuty, Steklov eigenproblems and the representation of solutions of elliptic boundary value problems. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 25 (2004), 321--348. 10.1081/NFA-120039655

    work page doi:10.1081/nfa-120039655 2004

  20. [20]

    Auchmuty, Spectral characterization of the trace spaces H^s( )

    G. Auchmuty, Spectral characterization of the trace spaces H^s( ) . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 38 (2006), 894--905. 10.1137/050626053

    work page doi:10.1137/050626053 2006

  21. [21]

    Auchmuty, Reproducing kernels for Hilbert spaces of real harmonic functions

    G. Auchmuty, Reproducing kernels for Hilbert spaces of real harmonic functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), 1994--2001. 10.1137/080739628

    work page doi:10.1137/080739628 2009

  22. [22]

    Auchmuty, Bases and comparison results for linear elliptic eigenproblems

    G. Auchmuty, Bases and comparison results for linear elliptic eigenproblems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 390 (2012), 394--406. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.01.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.01.051 2012

  23. [23]

    Auchmuty, Steklov representations of Green's functions for Laplacian boundary value problems

    G. Auchmuty, Steklov representations of Green's functions for Laplacian boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Optim. 77 (2018), 69--88. 10.1007/s00245-016-9370-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-016-9370-4 2018

  24. [24]

    Auchmuty and M

    G. Auchmuty and M. Cho, Boundary integrals and approximations of harmonic functions. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 36 (2015), 687--703. 10.1080/01630563.2015.1031383

    work page doi:10.1080/01630563.2015.1031383 2015

  25. [25]

    Auchmuty and Q

    G. Auchmuty and Q. Han, Spectral representations of solutions of linear elliptic equations on exterior regions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398 (2013), 1--10. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.07.023 2013

  26. [26]

    Auchmuty and Q

    G. Auchmuty and Q. Han, Representations of solutions of Laplacian boundary value problems on exterior regions. Appl. Math. Optim. 69 (2014), 21--45. 10.1007/s00245-013-9215-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-013-9215-3 2014

  27. [27]

    Ba\ nuelos and T

    R. Ba\ nuelos and T. Kulczycki, The Cauchy process and the Steklov problem. J. Func. Anal. 211 (2004), 355--423. 10.1016/j.jfa.2004.02.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2004.02.005 2004

  28. [28]

    Ba\ nuelos, T

    R. Ba\ nuelos, T. Kulczycki, I. Polterovich, and B. Siudeja, Eigenvalue inequalities for mixed Steklov problems, in Operator Theory and its Applications: In Memory of V. B. Lidskii (1924--2008), eds. M. Levitin and D. Vassiliev. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 231, 2010, 19--34. 10.1090/trans2/231

    work page doi:10.1090/trans2/231 1924

  29. [29]

    Bardos and M

    C. Bardos and M. Merigot, Asymptotic decay of the solution of a second-order elliptic equation in an unbounded domain. Applications to the spectral properties of a Hamiltonian. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A: Math. 76:4 (1977), 323--344. 10.1017/S0308210500019673

    work page doi:10.1017/s0308210500019673 1977

  30. [30]

    A. H. Barnett and T. Betcke, Stability and convergence of the method of fundamental solutions for Helmholtz problems on analytic domains. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008), 7003--7026. 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.008 2008

  31. [31]

    Behrndt and A

    J. Behrndt and A. F. M. ter Elst, Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps on bounded Lipschitz domains. J. Diff. Eq. 259 (2015), 5903--5926. 10.1016/j.jde.2015.07.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2015.07.012 2015

  32. [32]

    Behrndt, M

    J. Behrndt, M. M. Malamud, and H. Neidhardt, Scattering matrices and Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps. J. Funct. Anal. 273 (2017), 1970--2025. 10.1016/j.jfa.2017.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2017.06.001 2017

  33. [33]

    Behrndt, S

    J. Behrndt, S. Hassi, and H. de Snoo, Boundary value problems, Weyl functions, and differential operators. Birkh\"auser, Cham, 2020. 10.1007/978-3-030-36714-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36714-5 2020

  34. [34]

    Belgacem, H

    F. Belgacem, H. BelHadjAli, A. BenAmor, and A. Thabet, Robin Laplacian in the large coupling limit: convergence and spectral asymptotic. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 18 :2 (2018), 565--591. 10.2422/2036-2145.201601\_008

    work page doi:10.2422/2036-2145.201601 2018

  35. [35]

    O. G. Berg and P. H. von Hippel, Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 14 (1985), 131--160. 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.001023

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.001023 1985

  36. [36]

    Berkolaiko, G

    G. Berkolaiko, G. Cox, and J. L. Marzuola, Nodal defficiency, spectral flow, and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), 1611--1623. 10.1007/s11005-019-01159-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-019-01159-x 2019

  37. [37]

    Berkolaiko, G

    G. Berkolaiko, G. Cox, B. Helffer, and M. P. Sundqvist, Computing nodal deficiency with a refined Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), 246. 10.1007/s12220-022-00984-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12220-022-00984-2 2022

  38. [39]

    H. Bi, H. Li, and Y. Yang, An adaptive algorithm based on the shifted inverse iteration for the Steklov eigenvalue problem. Appl. Numer. Math. 105 (2016), 64--81. 10.1016/j.apnum.2016.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2016.02.003 2016

  39. [40]

    B\"ogli, J

    S. B\"ogli, J. B. Kennedy, and R. Lang, On the eigenvalues of the Robin Laplacian with a complex parameter. Anal. Math. Phys. 12 (2022), 39. 10.1007/s13324-022-00646-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s13324-022-00646-0 2022

  40. [41]

    Bogosel, The method of fundamental solutions applied to boundary eigenvalue problems

    B. Bogosel, The method of fundamental solutions applied to boundary eigenvalue problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 306 (2016), 265--285. 10.1016/j.cam.2016.04.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cam.2016.04.008 2016

  41. [42]

    Bogosel, D

    B. Bogosel, D. Bucur, and A. Giacomini, Optimal shapes maximizing the Steklov eigenvalues. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49 (2017), 1645--1680. 10.1137/16M1075260

    work page doi:10.1137/16m1075260 2017

  42. [43]

    Brock, An isoperimetric inequality for eigenvalues of the Stekloff problem

    F. Brock, An isoperimetric inequality for eigenvalues of the Stekloff problem. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 81 (2001), 69--71. 10.1002/1521-4001(200101)81:1<69::AID-ZAMM69>3.0.CO;2-\

    work page doi:10.1002/1521-4001(200101)81:1 2001

  43. [44]

    O. P. Bruno and J. Galkowski, Domains without dense Steklov nodal sets. J. Fourir Anal. Appl. 26 (2020), 45. 10.1007/s00041-020-09753-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00041-020-09753-7 2020

  44. [45]

    Bucur, P

    D. Bucur, P. Freitas, and J. Kennedy, The Robin problem, In Shape optimization and spectral theory, ed. A. Henrot. De Gruyter Open, Warsaw, 2017, 78--119. 10.1515/9783110550887-004

    work page doi:10.1515/9783110550887-004 2017

  45. [46]

    Bucur, V

    D. Bucur, V. Ferone, C. Nitsch, and C. Trombetti, Weinstock inequality in higher dimensions. J. Diff. Geom. 118 (2021), 1--21. 10.4310/jdg/1620272940

    work page doi:10.4310/jdg/1620272940 2021

  46. [47]

    Buhovsky, J

    L. Buhovsky, J. Payette, I. Polterovich, L. Polterovich, E. Shelukhin, and V. Stojisavljevi\'c, Coarse nodal count and topological persistence. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2024). 10.4171/JEMS/1521

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/1521 2024

  47. [48]

    Bundrock, A

    L. Bundrock, A. Girouard, D. S. Grebenkov, M. Levitin, and I. Polterovich, The exterior Steklov problem for Euclidean domains. Preprint (2025). 2511.09490

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    L. A. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian. Commun. Part. Diff. Eq. 32 (2007), 1245--1260. 10.1080/03605300600987306

    work page doi:10.1080/03605300600987306 2007

  49. [50]

    Cakoni and D

    F. Cakoni and D. Colton, Qualitative methods in inverse scattering theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006. 10.1007/3-540-31230-7

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-31230-7 2006

  50. [51]

    Cakoni, D

    F. Cakoni, D. Colton, S. Meng, and P. Monk, Stekloff eigenvalues in inverse scattering. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 76:4 (2016), 1737--1763. 10.1137/16M105870 ,

    work page doi:10.1137/16m105870 2016

  51. [52]

    A. P. Calder\'on, On an inverse boundary value problem. Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics, Soc. Brasileira de Matem\'atica, R\'io de Janeiro, (1980), 65--73; reprinted in Comput. Appl. Math. 25 , 2-3 (2006), 133--138

    1980

  52. [53]

    Chaigneau and D

    A. Chaigneau and D. S. Grebenkov, A numerical study of the generalized Steklov problem in planar domains. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 (2024), 445201. 10.1088/1751-8121/ad7fab

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad7fab 2024

  53. [54]

    S. N. Chandler-Wilde, I. G. Graham, S. Langdon, and E. A. Spence, Numerical-asymptotic boundary integral methods in high-frequency acoustic scattering. Acta Num. 21 (2012), 89--305. 10.1017/S0962492912000037

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492912000037 2012

  54. [55]

    Chen, J.-W

    J.-T. Chen, J.-W. Lee, and K.-T. Lien, Analytical and numerical studies for solving Steklov eigenproblems by using the boundary integral equation method/boundary element method. Engnr. Anal. Bound. Elem. 114 (2020), 136--147. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.02.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.02.005 2020

  55. [56]

    A. F. Cheviakov and M. J. Ward, Optimizing the principal eigenvalue of the Laplacian in a sphere with interior traps. Math. Computer Model. 53 (2011), 1394--1409. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.025 2011

  56. [57]

    T. J. Christiansen and K. Datchev, Low energy scattering asymptotics for planar obstacles. Pure Appl. Anal. 5 (2023), 767--794. 10.2140/paa.2023.5.767

    work page doi:10.2140/paa.2023.5.767 2023

  57. [58]

    Colbois, A

    B. Colbois, A. Girouard, C. Gordon, and D. Sher, Some recent developments on the Steklov eigenvalue problem. Rev. Mat. Complut. 37 (2024), 1--161. 10.1007/s13163-023-00480-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s13163-023-00480-3 2024

  58. [59]

    G. Cox, C. K. R. T. Jones, and J. L. Marzuola, Manifold decompositions and indices of Schr\"odinger operators. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 66 (2017), 1573--1602. 10.1512/iumj.2017.66.6129

    work page doi:10.1512/iumj.2017.66.6129 2017

  59. [60]

    Dambrine, D

    M. Dambrine, D. Kateb, and J. Lamboley, An extremal eigenvalue problem for the Wentzell--Laplace operator. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e 33 (2016), 409--450. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.11.002 2016

  60. [61]

    Daners, Inverse positivity for general Robin problems on Lipschitz domains

    D. Daners, Inverse positivity for general Robin problems on Lipschitz domains. Arch. Math. 92 (2009), 57--69. 10.1007/s00013-008-2918-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00013-008-2918-z 2009

  61. [62]

    Daners, Non-positivity of the semigroup generated by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator

    D. Daners, Non-positivity of the semigroup generated by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. Positivity 18 (2014), 235--256. 10.1007/s11117-013-0243-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11117-013-0243-7 2014

  62. [63]

    Daners and J

    D. Daners and J. B. Kennedy, On the asymptotic behaviour of the eigenvalues of a Robin problem. Differ. Integral Equ. 23:7/8 (2010), 659--669. 10.57262/die/1356019189

    work page doi:10.57262/die/1356019189 2010

  63. [64]

    Daud\'e, B

    T. Daud\'e, B. Helffer, and F. Nicoleau, Exponential localization of Steklov eigenfunctions on warped product manifolds: the flea on the elephant phenomenon. Ann. Math. Qu\'ebec 47 (2023), 295--330. 10.1007/s40316-021-00185-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s40316-021-00185-3 2023

  64. [65]

    Decio, Nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions near the boundary: inner radius estimates

    S. Decio, Nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions near the boundary: inner radius estimates. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2022:21 (2022), 16709--16729. 10.1093/imrn/rnab198

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnab198 2022

  65. [66]

    Delitsyn and D

    A. Delitsyn and D. S. Grebenkov, Mode matching methods in spectral and scattering problems. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 71 (2018), 537--580. 10.1093/qjmam/hby018

    work page doi:10.1093/qjmam/hby018 2018

  66. [67]

    Delitsyn and D

    A. Delitsyn and D. S. Grebenkov, Resonance scattering in a waveguide with identical thick perforated barriers. Appl. Math. Comput. 412 (2022), 126592. 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126592

    work page doi:10.1016/j.amc.2021.126592 2022

  67. [68]

    Dietze and K

    C. Dietze and K. Pankrashkin, Peculiar behavior of the principal Laplacian eigenvalue for large negative Robin parameters. J. London Math. Soc. 112:1 (2025), e70242. 10.1112/jlms.70242

    work page doi:10.1112/jlms.70242 2025

  68. [69]

    D. G. Duffy, Mixed boundary value problems . Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2008. 10.1201/9781420010947

    work page doi:10.1201/9781420010947 2008

  69. [70]

    T. M. Dunster, On the order derivatives of Bessel functions. Constr. Approx. 46 (2017), 47--68. 10.1007/s00365-016-9355-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00365-016-9355-1 2017

  70. [71]

    Edward, An inverse spectral result for the Neumann operator on planar domains

    J. Edward, An inverse spectral result for the Neumann operator on planar domains. J. Funct. Anal. 111 (1993), 312--322. 10.1006/jfan.1993.1015

    work page doi:10.1006/jfan.1993.1015 1993

  71. [72]

    A. F. M. ter Elst and E.-M. Ouhabaz, Analyticity of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann semigroup on continuous functions. J. Evol. Equ. 19 (2019), 21--31. 10.1007/s00028-018-0467-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00028-018-0467-x 2019

  72. [73]

    Enciso, A

    A. Enciso, A. Pistoia and L. Provenzano, Non-existence of Courant-type nodal domain bounds for eigenfunctions of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2025). 10.4171/JEMS/1722

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/1722 2025

  73. [74]

    Exner and H

    P. Exner and H. Kova r \' k, Quantum waveguides . Springer, Cham, 2015. 10.1007/978-3-319-18576-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18576-7 2015

  74. [75]

    Exner, A

    P. Exner, A. Minakov, and L. Parnovski, Asymptotic eigenvalue estimates for a Robin problem with a large parameter. Port. Math. 71 (2014), 141--156. 10.4171/PM/1945

    work page doi:10.4171/pm/1945 2014

  75. [76]

    O. M. Faltinsen and A. N. Timokha, Sloshing . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  76. [77]

    Filonov, On an inequality between Dirichlet and Neumann eigenvalues for the Laplace operator

    N. Filonov, On an inequality between Dirichlet and Neumann eigenvalues for the Laplace operator. St. Petersburg Math. J. 16 (2) (2005), 413--416. 10.1090/S1061-0022-05-00857-5

    work page doi:10.1090/s1061-0022-05-00857-5 2005

  77. [78]

    D. W. Fox and J. R. Kuttler, Sloshing frequencies. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 34 (1983), 668--696. 10.1007/BF00948809

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00948809 1983

  78. [79]

    Fraser and R

    A. Fraser and R. Schoen, Some results on higher eigenvalue optimisation. Calc. Var. 59 (2020), 151. 10.1007/s00526-020-01802-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00526-020-01802-9 2020

  79. [80]

    Freidlin, Functional integration and partial differential equations

    M. Freidlin, Functional integration and partial differential equations . Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1985

    1985

  80. [81]

    Friedlander, Some inequalities between Dirichlet and Neumann eigenvalues

    L. Friedlander, Some inequalities between Dirichlet and Neumann eigenvalues. Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. 116 (1991), 153--160. 10.1007/BF00375590

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00375590 1991

Showing first 80 references.