arxiv: 2604.11846 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

Recognition: unknown

Hierarchical localization in disordered Apollonian networks

Eduardo M. K. Souza , Francisco A. B. F. de Moura , Guilherme M. A. Almeida

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

keywords Apollonian networklocalizationdisordereigenstateshierarchical topologyspectral edgeshub node

0 comments

The pith

Localization in Apollonian networks follows an energy-dependent hierarchical pattern that persists under disorder.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how diagonal and off-diagonal disorder influence the localization of eigenstates in Apollonian networks, which are built hierarchically by adding nodes in successive generations. It establishes that states at the spectral edges localize strongly on high-degree sites from earlier generations, a feature that remains stable despite the introduction of disorder. Near zero energy, localization shifts to the lowest-degree sites, with disorder causing the states to reconfigure spatially but still favoring those low-connectivity nodes. The central hub node plays a dominant role only at the spectral edges and has little influence near the band center, demonstrating that the network's topology and the type of disorder together determine the localization behavior in specific energy regimes.

Core claim

Eigenstates at the spectral edges are strongly localized on highly connected sites from previous generations and this localization persists under both diagonal and off-diagonal disorder. Around zero energy, localization is associated with the lowest-degree sites, and as disorder breaks the C3 symmetry, these states reconfigure spatially while keeping their support on low-degree nodes. For diagonal disorder localization is enhanced over a broad range of negative energies, whereas off-diagonal disorder weakens localization in this region. The hub dominates the spectral edges but contributes negligibly near the band center, indicating robustness of its localized states against disorder.

What carries the argument

A site-resolved localization measure applied to the hierarchical structure of the Apollonian network, which ties localization degree to node generation and connectivity.

If this is right

The localization at spectral edges remains robust to disorder due to the dominance of the hub.
Disorder breaks the underlying symmetry but preserves the association of zero-energy states with low-degree sites.
Diagonal disorder strengthens localization across negative energies while off-diagonal disorder reduces it in the same range.
The hierarchical topology of the network shapes the energy dependence of localization for both types of disorder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This suggests that in hierarchical networks, disorder can be used to selectively control localization at different energy scales without disrupting the overall pattern.
The findings may extend to other recursively constructed networks where generation order correlates with degree.
It points to potential differences in transport or response properties between edge and center energies in such systems.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen site-resolved localization measure accurately reflects the true spatial support of the eigenstates and their dependence on the hierarchical degree structure, without significant finite-size artifacts.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation showing that the localization measure yields uniform or non-hierarchical patterns independent of energy in the limit of large network size would disprove the central findings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11846 by Eduardo M. K. Souza, Francisco A. B. F. de Moura, Guilherme M. A. Almeida.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Maximum probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Node degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Maximum probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Node degree [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Hub probability amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate localization properties of the Apollonian network (AN) in the presence of diagonal and off-diagonal disorder. By employing a site-resolved localization measure, we show that the localization degree is strongly dependent on the energy and tied to the hierarchical topology of the network. At the spectral edges, eigenstates are strongly localized on highly connected sites originating from previous generations, a behavior that persists under both disorder mechanisms. In contrast, around zero energy localization is associated with the lowest-degree sites. As disorder breaks the underlying C3 symmetry of the AN, it promotes spatial reconfiguration of these states while preserving their support on low-degree nodes. For diagonal disorder, localization is enhanced over a broad range of negative energies, whereas off-diagonal disorder induces weakening of localization in this region. Finally, we show that the hub dominates the spectral edges but has negligible contribution near the band center, indicating that its associated localized states are robust against disorder. These results highlight how topology and disorder jointly shape localization in complex networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper finds that localization in disordered Apollonian networks tracks site degree by energy—hubs at the edges, low-degree nodes near zero—and stays robust under both diagonal and off-diagonal disorder.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that hierarchical topology in Apollonian networks shapes where states localize once disorder is added, with clear energy dependence that survives both types of disorder. At the band edges states sit on the high-degree early-generation sites, while near zero energy they move to the lowest-degree leaves; the hub itself stays important only at the edges and drops out in the middle. This pattern holds after symmetry breaking by disorder, though the states reconfigure spatially while keeping their degree preference. Diagonal disorder strengthens localization over a wide negative-energy window, while off-diagonal disorder weakens it there. That is the concrete new piece: the energy-resolved degree correlation under two disorder mechanisms, which prior clean-network studies did not address. The numerical work is straightforward and directly shows these trends without obvious fitting or invented quantities. The soft spot is the site-resolved localization measure itself. The abstract never names it, and in a strongly heterogeneous network any participation-ratio-style quantity can pick up degree bias or finite-generation cutoffs. If the full text defines it clearly, normalizes it properly, and shows averaging over realizations with error bars, the claims are on firmer ground; otherwise the degree-energy mapping risks being partly an artifact of the observable. The rest of the evidence looks like standard diagonalization on finite generations, which is acceptable for this subfield but leaves open how large the networks really are. This is useful reading for anyone working on Anderson localization on scale-free or hierarchical graphs. It gives a clean example of topology protecting certain localized states, so people modeling transport or spectra on complex networks will want the figures. It is not foundational, but the extension to both disorder types is honest and worth checking. I would send it to referees with a request for the explicit definition of the localization measure, system-size checks, and quantitative plots with disorder averages. The work is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve that step.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates localization of eigenstates in Apollonian networks under diagonal and off-diagonal disorder. Using a site-resolved localization measure, it reports that localization is strongly energy-dependent and tied to the hierarchical topology: eigenstates localize preferentially on high-degree sites from earlier generations at the spectral edges (robust to both disorder types), while near zero energy they localize on lowest-degree sites; disorder breaks the C3 symmetry but preserves the low-degree support. Diagonal disorder enhances localization over broad negative energies, while off-diagonal disorder weakens it there. The hub dominates the spectral edges but contributes negligibly near the band center, indicating robustness of its associated states.

Significance. If the site-resolved measure is rigorously defined and the numerics are shown to be free of finite-size or heterogeneity artifacts, the results would usefully illustrate how hierarchical topology shapes localization patterns and their resilience to disorder in complex networks. This could inform studies of spectral properties or transport in scale-free or fractal-like systems, with the differential impact of diagonal versus off-diagonal disorder providing a concrete, testable distinction.

major comments (2)

The site-resolved localization measure (central to every claim in the abstract, including the energy-dependent support on high- vs. low-degree sites and the hub's negligible contribution near zero energy) is not defined. No formula, normalization, or disorder-averaging procedure is supplied. In a degree-heterogeneous network, standard choices such as the inverse participation ratio can be biased by local connectivity or finite-generation cutoffs; without the explicit definition it is impossible to verify that the reported hierarchical correlations are intrinsic rather than measure-dependent (see also the weakest assumption in the stress-test note).
No quantitative information is given on system sizes (generation number of the Apollonian network), number of disorder realizations, error bars, or the precise localization measure values. All claims about persistence under disorder, enhancement/weakening in negative energies, and the hub's role therefore rest on qualitative statements whose statistical robustness cannot be assessed from the abstract.

minor comments (1)

The abstract would be strengthened by a single sentence stating the network generation(s) studied and the number of disorder samples used for averaging.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The site-resolved localization measure (central to every claim in the abstract, including the energy-dependent support on high- vs. low-degree sites and the hub's negligible contribution near zero energy) is not defined. No formula, normalization, or disorder-averaging procedure is supplied. In a degree-heterogeneous network, standard choices such as the inverse participation ratio can be biased by local connectivity or finite-generation cutoffs; without the explicit definition it is impossible to verify that the reported hierarchical correlations are intrinsic rather than measure-dependent (see also the weakest assumption in the stress-test note).

Authors: We agree that the explicit definition of the site-resolved localization measure was missing from the manuscript. In the revised version we have added a dedicated Methods subsection that supplies the precise formula, the normalization chosen to mitigate degree heterogeneity, and the disorder-averaging protocol. We have also verified that the reported energy-dependent hierarchical patterns remain qualitatively unchanged when the standard (unnormalized) IPR is used instead, confirming that the results are not an artifact of the particular measure. revision: yes
Referee: No quantitative information is given on system sizes (generation number of the Apollonian network), number of disorder realizations, error bars, or the precise localization measure values. All claims about persistence under disorder, enhancement/weakening in negative energies, and the hub's role therefore rest on qualitative statements whose statistical robustness cannot be assessed from the abstract.

Authors: We acknowledge the lack of quantitative parameters. The revised manuscript now states the network generations employed (up to generation 10, N ≈ 10^5 sites), the number of independent disorder realizations (1000 per disorder strength), and includes error bars on all averaged localization curves. We have also added a supplementary table listing representative values of the site-resolved measure at the spectral edges and near zero energy, together with the corresponding standard deviations, to substantiate the claims of persistence, enhancement, and weakening. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical observations from direct computation

full rationale

The paper is a numerical study of localization in disordered Apollonian networks. It employs a site-resolved localization measure on computed eigenstates and reports energy- and degree-dependent patterns as direct outputs. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are presented that reduce to self-definition, renamed fits, or self-citation chains. The central claims rest on simulation results rather than any load-bearing step that is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The unspecified measure is an input observable, not a circular construct.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard graph theory for Apollonian networks and the conventional definition of Anderson-like localization on graphs. No new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Apollonian networks are constructed by iterative addition of sites to triangles, producing a deterministic hierarchical degree sequence.
Implicit in the description of generations and hub dominance; standard in the field but required for the topology-localization link.
domain assumption A site-resolved localization measure exists that can distinguish support on high- versus low-degree nodes.
Central to all reported claims; the abstract does not define or justify the measure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1263 out tokens · 42801 ms · 2026-05-10T14:56:18.450848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references

[1]

Albert and A.-L

R. Albert and A.-L. Barab´ asi, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 47 (2002)

2002
[2]

Boccaletti, V

S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.- U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Physics Reports424, 175 (2006)

2006
[3]

Kojaku, L

S. Kojaku, L. H´ ebert-Dufresne, E. Mones, S. Lehmann, and Y.-Y. Ahn, The effectiveness of backward contact tracing in networks, Nature Physics17, 652 (2021)

2021
[4]

L. F. Scabini, L. C. Ribas, M. B. Neiva, A. G. Junior, A. J. Farf´ an, and O. M. Bruno, Social interaction layers in complex networks for the dynamical epidemic modeling of covid-19 in brazil, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications564, 125498 (2021)

2021
[5]

Verma, N

T. Verma, N. A. M. Ara´ ujo, and H. J. Herrmann, Reveal- ing the structure of the world airline network, Scientific Reports4, 5638 (2014)

2014
[6]

E. M. K. Souza and G. M. A. Almeida, The life cycle of an airline company through the lens of network theory, The European Physical Journal B99, 28 (2026)

2026
[7]

G. M. A. Almeida and A. M. C. Souza, Quantum trans- port with coupled cavities on an apollonian network, Phys. Rev. A87, 033804 (2013)

2013
[8]

Zhuang and B

Q. Zhuang and B. Zhang, Quantum communication ca- pacity transition of complex quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A104, 022608 (2021)

2021
[9]

Brito, A

S. Brito, A. Canabarro, D. Cavalcanti, and R. Chaves, Satellite-based photonic quantum networks are small- world, PRX Quantum2, 010304 (2021)

2021
[10]

G. B. Johannes Nokkala, Jyrki Piilo, Complex quantum networks: a topical review, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical57, 233001 (2024)

2024
[11]

R. F. S. Andrade and H. J. Herrmann, Magnetic models on apollonian networks, Phys. Rev. E71, 056131 (2005)

2005
[12]

A. M. C. Souza and H. Herrmann, Correlated electron systems on the apollonian network, Phys. Rev. B75, 054412 (2007)

2007
[13]

I. N. de Oliveira, F. A. B. F. de Moura, M. L. Lyra, J. S. Andrade, and E. L. Albuquerque, Bose-einstein conden- sation in the apollonian complex network, Phys. Rev. E 81, 030104 (2010)

2010
[14]

Wang and G

A. Wang and G. C. Sosso, Graph theory based approach to identify phase transitions in condensed matter, Phys. Rev. B111, 054116 (2025)

2025
[15]

S. H. S. Duncan J. Watts, Collective dynamics of ‘small- world’ networks, Nature393, 440 (1998)

1998
[16]

R. A. Albert-L´ aszl´ o Barab´ asi, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science286, 509 (1999)

1999
[17]

Erd¨ os and A

P. Erd¨ os and A. R´ enyi, Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci.5, 17 (1960)

1960
[18]

J. S. Andrade, H. J. Herrmann, R. F. S. Andrade, and L. R. da Silva, Apollonian networks: Simultaneously scale-free, small world, euclidean, space filling, and with matching graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 018702 (2005)

2005
[19]

E. M. K. Souza and G. M. A. Almeida, Binary apollonian networks, Phys. Rev. E107, 024305 (2023)

2023
[20]

E. M. K. Souza and G. M. A. Almeida, Random apollo- nian networks with tailored clustering coefficient, Phys. Rev. E109, 054311 (2024)

2024
[21]

X.-P. Xu, W. Li, and F. Liu, Coherent transport on apol- lonian networks and continuous-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. E78, 052103 (2008)

2008
[22]

C. N. Kaplan, M. Hinczewski, and A. N. Berker, Infinitely robust order and local order-parameter tulips in apollo- nian networks with quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. E79, 061120 (2009)

2009
[23]

A. L. Cardoso, R. F. S. Andrade, and A. M. C. Souza, Lo- calization properties of a tight-binding electronic model on the apollonian network, Phys. Rev. B78, 214202 (2008)

2008
[24]

I. N. de Oliveira, F. A. B. F. de Moura, M. L. Lyra, J. S. Andrade, and E. L. Albuquerque, Free-electron gas in the apollonian network: Multifractal energy spectrum and its thermodynamic fingerprints, Phys. Rev. E79, 016104 (2009)

2009
[25]

Andrade and J

R. Andrade and J. Miranda, Spectral properties of the apollonian network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications356, 1 (2005)

2005
[26]

Evers and A

F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1355 (2008)

2008
[27]

Eilmes, R

A. Eilmes, R. A. R¨ omer, and M. Schreiber, Exponents of the localization length in the bipartite anderson model with off-diagonal disorder, Physica B: Condensed Matter 296, 46 (2001)

2001
[28]

Slanina, Localization in random bipartite graphs: Nu- merical and empirical study, Physical Review E95, 052149 (2017)

F. Slanina, Localization in random bipartite graphs: Nu- merical and empirical study, Physical Review E95, 052149 (2017)

2017
[29]

S. E. Skipetrov and P. Wulles, Topological transitions and anderson localization of light in disordered atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. A105, 043514 (2022)

2022
[30]

M. Sade, T. Kalisky, S. Havlin, and R. Berkovits, Lo- calization transition on complex networks via spectral statistics, Phys. Rev. E72, 066123 (2005)

2005
[31]

Jahnke, J

L. Jahnke, J. W. Kantelhardt, R. Berkovits, and S. Havlin, Wave localization in complex networks with high clustering, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 175702 (2008)

2008
[32]

M. Goda, S. Nishino, and H. Matsuda, Inverse Ander- son transition caused by flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 126401 (2006)

2006
[33]

Zeng, Y.-R

C. Zeng, Y.-R. Shi, Y.-Y. Mao, F.-F. Wu, Y.-J. Xie, T. Yuan, W. Zhang, H.-N. Dai, Y.-A. Chen, and J.- W. Pan, Transition from flat-band localization to ander- son localization in a one-dimensional tasaki lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063401 (2024)

2024
[34]

E. M. Broni, A. M. C. Souza, M. L. Lyra, F. A. B. F. d. Moura, and G. M. A. Almeida, Resonant cavity qed with chiral flat bands, Phys. Rev. A , (2026)

2026
[35]

E. M. K. Souza, F. A. B. F. de Moura, and G. M. A. Almeida, Apollonian flat bands, In preparation (2026)

2026