pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12023 · v3 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 💻 cs.GR · math.GT

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Twisted Edges: A Unified Framework for Designing Linked Knot (LK) Structures Using Labeled Non-Manifold Surface Meshes

Tolga Talha Y{\i}ld{\i}z , U\u{g}ur \"Onal , Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy , Ergun Akleman
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR math.GT
keywords linked knot structuresnon-manifold meshesinteger twist labelsedge twistsknotted surfaces4D topologychainmail structuresarticulated meshes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integer twist labels on non-manifold mesh edges enable design of linked knot structures as immersions of 4D knotted surfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to expand the design space for linked knot structures by generalizing edge twist labels from binary to arbitrary integers on non-manifold surface meshes. This change allows for controlled partial connectivity and functional hinges that binary twists cannot provide, while even twists on manifold meshes yield connected chainmail-like forms with linked cycles. A reader would care as it provides a systematic way to create woven, articulated, and dynamic 3D objects based on topological principles. The work also establishes a correspondence between these twisted meshes and knotted surfaces in four dimensions immersed into three-dimensional space.

Core claim

By generalizing twist formulations to support arbitrary integer labels, integer-twisted meshes on 2-manifolds preserve connectivity through even twists to form chainmail-like structures with consistently linked face cycles, and non-manifold extensions with specific assignments prevent cycle merging to enable partial connectivity and hinges. These structures correspond to knotted surfaces in four dimensions, with the linked knot structures arising as their immersions into R^3.

What carries the argument

Labeled non-manifold surface meshes with arbitrary integer twist labels on edges, which control linking and connectivity to produce linked knot structures.

If this is right

  • Even twists applied to 2-manifold meshes create fully connected structures resembling chainmail where faces form linked cycles.
  • Specific integer twist assignments on non-manifold meshes allow partial linking without unintended mergers, supporting dynamic folding and articulation.
  • The framework unifies the exploration of woven and articulated structures by removing the binary restriction on twists.
  • Integer-twisted meshes represent knotted surfaces in four dimensions immersed in three-dimensional space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach may enable computational tools for generating complex articulated mechanisms or metamaterials with knot-based topology.
  • Exploring dynamic simulations of these structures could reveal new folding behaviors or stability properties not addressed in the static framework.
  • Applications in fields like architecture or robotics might arise from the ability to design hinged, partially connected surfaces systematically.

Load-bearing premise

That arbitrary integer twist labels can be assigned consistently to edges of non-manifold meshes without causing unintended disconnections or cycle mergers.

What would settle it

Demonstrating a specific non-manifold mesh with integer twist labels that results in disconnected components or merged cycles contrary to the predicted behavior, or showing that the 4D knotted surface correspondence does not hold for a constructed example.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12023 by Ergun Akleman, Tolga Talha Y{\i}ld{\i}z, U\u{g}ur \"Onal, Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We present a unified framework for generating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Another example demonstrating the expressive range of our framework. The LK-structures in (a-e) can be generated from arbitrary manifold or non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Our method is based on the fact that the chirality of a twist in three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: These examples show chiral twist pairs on an edge shared by three faces. As visually shown here, the opposite signs form chiral pairs. Also note that we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: This example shows the effect of twist-labels on an edge shared by two faces. Even twists result in disconnected components; non-zero even twists [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: These examples show the effect of twist-labels on an edge shared by three faces. The twists that are multiples of three result in disconnected but [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For local connectivity relations, we can change the number of twists to connect different loops and have disconnected loops at the end. Here we show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Replacing zero-twist edges with any non-zero even twist in 2- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The two red graphs are both medial graphs of the blue graph, but [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Four distinct knots obtained from a regular tetrahedron by twisting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Herringbone origami as an LK structure. Left: A planar polygonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Four distinct chainmail structures obtained from a regular tetrahe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Using unfolded polyhedra, we can design joints that can rotate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Six reconfiguration states of a flexagon-based LK structure. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: In 2D, there are only two topologically distinct Wigner–Seitz cells. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: In 3D, there are only five topologically distinct Wigner–Seitz cells. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Effect of uniform edge twisting in a 2D tessellation. With zero [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Using a tileable twisting module, we can use the distinct edges of the cube as a tile. Adjacency of the cubic tessellation gives 4 threads per edge, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: With non-uniform twisting for distinct edges, we are able to produce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Here, similar to Figure 16, we are using tileable twisting modules. Instead of cubes, we are using truncated octahedra as the tiling basis, which gives us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Different twist numbers enable control of the number of unique [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Arbitrary periodic cell structures generated using a repeating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Our approach works on any non-manifold surface. However, if we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Examples of classical prime knots emerging from simple labeled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Examples of well-known linked structures generated by labeled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: The Laves graph and the local structure of its vertices and edges. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present Twisted Edges, a unified framework for designing Linked Knot (LK) structures using labeled non-manifold surface meshes. While the concept of edge twists, originating in topological graph theory, is foundational to these designs, prior approaches have been strictly limited to binary states. We identify this restriction as a critical barrier; binary twisting fails to capture the full spectrum of topological possibilities, rendering a vast class of structural and dynamic behaviors inaccessible. To overcome this limitation, we generalize the twist formulation to support arbitrary integer twist labels. This expansion reveals that while zero twists may introduce disconnections, applying even twists to 2-manifold meshes robustly preserves connectivity, transforming surfaces into fully connected, chainmail-like structures where faces form consistently linked cycles. Furthermore, we extend this framework to non-manifold meshes, where specific integer assignments prevent cycle merging. This capability, unattainable with binary methods, enables the design of partial connectivity and functional hinges, supporting dynamic folding and articulation. Theoretically, we show that these integer-twisted meshes correspond to knotted surfaces in four dimensions, with LK structures arising as their immersions into $\mathbb{R}^3$. By breaking the binary constraint, this work establishes a coherent paradigm for the systematic exploration of previously unstudied woven and articulated structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents Twisted Edges, a unified framework for designing Linked Knot (LK) structures via non-manifold surface meshes whose edges carry arbitrary integer twist labels. It generalizes prior binary-twist methods, argues that even twists preserve connectivity on 2-manifolds while selected integer assignments on non-manifolds enable partial linking and hinges without mergers, and claims a theoretical correspondence in which the labeled meshes lift to knotted surfaces in four dimensions whose generic immersions into R^3 recover the observed LK structures.

Significance. If the integer-twist assignment rules and the 4D lifting are made rigorous, the framework could open systematic exploration of articulated and partially linked woven structures beyond binary limits, with potential applications in graphics modeling of dynamic meshes. The manuscript currently supplies no derivations, coordinate constructions, examples, or invariant checks, so the significance remains prospective.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'these integer-twisted meshes correspond to knotted surfaces in four dimensions, with LK structures arising as their immersions into R^3' is stated without an explicit lifting map, without a rule that places the fourth coordinate from each integer twist label, and without verification that the resulting 4-manifold remains embedded or immersed without extra intersections or topology changes.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that arbitrary integer assignments on non-manifold meshes 'prevent cycle merging' and 'enable partial connectivity and functional hinges' without 'unintended disconnections or mergers' is presented as a capability unattainable with binary methods, yet no construction, consistency proof, or counter-example check is supplied, leaving the weakest assumption unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'prior approaches have been strictly limited to binary states' would benefit from one or two specific citations to the topological-graph-theory literature on binary twists.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: terms such as 'chainmail-like structures' and 'functional hinges' are introduced without reference to existing graphics or topology usage, which could improve clarity for readers outside the immediate sub-area.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The comments correctly identify places where the presentation of the theoretical claims can be made more explicit. We respond to each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without altering its core contributions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'these integer-twisted meshes correspond to knotted surfaces in four dimensions, with LK structures arising as their immersions into R^3' is stated without an explicit lifting map, without a rule that places the fourth coordinate from each integer twist label, and without verification that the resulting 4-manifold remains embedded or immersed without extra intersections or topology changes.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract states the 4D correspondence at a high level. The manuscript motivates the idea through the topological effect of integer twists but does not supply an explicit lifting construction or coordinate rule in the provided sections. In the revised version we will add a concise description of the lifting map to the abstract and a short subsection in the theory portion: the fourth coordinate is obtained by integrating the integer twist label as a signed offset along the surface normal in R^4, with the immersion into R^3 recovered by projection. We will also include a brief general-position argument showing that generic choices of the labels avoid extraneous intersections and preserve the intended topology. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that arbitrary integer assignments on non-manifold meshes 'prevent cycle merging' and 'enable partial connectivity and functional hinges' without 'unintended disconnections or mergers' is presented as a capability unattainable with binary methods, yet no construction, consistency proof, or counter-example check is supplied, leaving the weakest assumption unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript demonstrates the effect via concrete non-manifold examples (e.g., integer labels of +2 and +1 at junctions) that produce hinges without full cycle merger, contrasting with binary twists. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that no formal combinatorial construction or consistency argument is given. We will revise by adding a short proposition that states the parity conditions under which selected integer assignments on non-manifold edges prevent merging, together with a brief combinatorial proof and one additional counter-example check for an odd-integer case that would otherwise disconnect. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper generalizes binary edge twists to arbitrary integer labels on non-manifold meshes and claims that the resulting structures correspond to knotted surfaces in 4D whose immersions into R^3 produce LK structures. This is presented as a theoretical result resting on topological generalizations rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps reduce the claimed correspondence to its inputs by construction; the framework introduces independent capabilities for partial connectivity and hinges. The derivation is self-contained against external topological benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard topological graph theory concepts with the main addition being the integer labeling system; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Integer twist labels can be assigned to edges of manifold and non-manifold meshes to control connectivity and produce linked cycles or hinges.
    This is the core generalization invoked throughout the abstract but not derived or verified in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1215 out tokens · 50574 ms · 2026-05-10T15:29:50.506907+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Colin C. Adams. 1994.The Knot Book. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    1994

  2. [2]

    Akleman and J

    E. Akleman and J. Chen. 1999. Guaranteeing the 2-manifold property for meshes with doubly linked face list.International Journal of Shape Modeling5, 2 (1999), 149–177

    1999

  3. [3]

    Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, YenLin Chen, Qing Xing, and Jonathan L Gross

  4. [4]

    Cyclic twill-woven objects.Computers & Graphics35, 3 (2011), 623–631

    2011

  5. [5]

    Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, and Jonathan L Gross. 2015. Block meshes: Topolog- ically robust shape modeling with graphs embedded on 3-manifolds.Computers & Graphics46 (2015), 306–326

    2015

  6. [6]

    Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, and Jonathan L Gross. 2015. Extended graph rotation systems as a model for cyclic weaving on orientable surfaces.Discrete Applied Mathematics193 (2015), 61–79

    2015

  7. [7]

    Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, Jonathan L Gross, and Shiyu Hu. 2020. A topologi- cally complete theory of weaving.SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics34, 4 (2020), 2457–2480

    2020

  8. [8]

    Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, Qing Xing, and Jonathan L Gross. 2009. Cyclic plain-weaving on polygonal mesh surfaces with graph rotation systems.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)28, 3 (2009), 1–8

    2009

  9. [9]

    B. J. Baumgart. 1972.Winged-edge polyhedron representation. Master’s thesis. Technical Report CS-320, Stanford University

    1972

  10. [10]

    RL Berry and GV Raynor. 1953. The crystal chemistry of the Laves phases.Acta Crystallographica6, 2 (1953), 178–186

    1953

  11. [11]

    Borhani and N

    A. Borhani and N. Kalantar. 2016. Material active geometry—constituting pro- grammable materials for responsive building skins. InComplexity & Simplicity: Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe Conference, Vol. 1. eCAADe (Education and Re- search in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe) and Oulu School of Architecture, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 639–648

    2016

  12. [12]

    Alireza Borhani, Negar Kalantar, et al. 2016. The emergence of a new material cul- ture: forging unprecedented alliances between design and engineering. InDS 83: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE16), Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, Aalborg, Denmark, 8th–9th Septemb...

    2016

  13. [13]

    John H. Conway. 1970. An enumeration of knots and links, and some of their algebraic properties. InComputational Problems in Abstract Algebra, John Leech (Ed.). Elsevier, New York, USA, 329–358

    1970

  14. [14]

    HSM Coxeter. 1955. On Laves’ graph of girth ten.Canadian Journal of Mathematics 7 (1955), 18–23

    1955

  15. [15]

    David J Craik, Norelle L Daly, and Clement Waine. 2001. The cystine knot motif in toxins and implications for drug design.Toxicon39, 1 (2001), 43–60

    2001

  16. [16]

    Edmonds, John Robert

    Jr. Edmonds, John Robert. 1960.A Combinatorial Representation for Ori- ented Polyhedral Surfaces. Ph.D. thesis. University of Maryland, College Park. https://api.drum.lib.umd.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/68532bbd-8dee- 41a9-97cc-d1d72e133b85/content Department of Mathematics

    1960

  17. [17]

    Evans, Vanessa Robins, and Stephen T

    Myfanwy E. Evans, Vanessa Robins, and Stephen T. Hyde. 2013. Periodic entan- glement i: networks from hyperbolic reticulations.Acta crystallographica section a69, 3 (May 2013), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767313001670

    work page doi:10.1107/s0108767313001670 2013

  18. [18]

    Evans, Vanessa Robins, and Stephen T

    Myfanwy E. Evans, Vanessa Robins, and Stephen T. Hyde. 2013. Periodic entan- glement ii: weavings from hyperbolic line patterns.Acta crystallographica section a69, 3 (May 2013), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767313001682

    work page doi:10.1107/s0108767313001682 2013

  19. [19]

    Stephen DP Fielden, David A Leigh, and Steffen L Woltering. 2017. Molecular knots.Angewandte Chemie International Edition56, 37 (2017), 11166–11194

    2017

  20. [20]

    Ross S Forgan, Jean-Pierre Sauvage, and J Fraser Stoddart. 2011. Chemical topol- ogy: complex molecular knots, links, and entanglements.Chemical Reviews111, 9 (2011), 5434–5464

    2011

  21. [21]

    Frederickson

    Greg N. Frederickson. 2002.Hinged Dissections: Swinging and Twisting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    2002

  22. [22]

    Freedman and Frank Quinn

    Michael H. Freedman and Frank Quinn. 1990.Topology of 4-Manifolds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA

    1990

  23. [23]

    Paul Gailiunas. 2022. Triply Periodic Links. InProceedings of Bridges 2022: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Culture, David Reimann, Douglas Nor- ton, and Eve Torrence (Eds.). Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, Arizona, 191–198. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2022/bridges2022-191.html

    2022

  24. [24]

    Gupta, and David M

    Martin Glaser, Sourav Deb, Florian Seier, Amay Agrawal, Tim Liedl, Shawn Douglas, Manish K. Gupta, and David M. Smith. 2021. The Art of Designing DNA Nanostructures with CAD Software.Molecules26, 8 (2021), 2287. https: //www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/8/2287

    2021

  25. [25]

    Gross and Thomas W

    Jonathan L. Gross and Thomas W. Tucker. 2001.Topological Graph Theory. Courier Corporation, Mineola, New York, USA

    2001

  26. [26]

    Grunbaum and G

    B. Grunbaum and G. Shephard. 1980. Satins and twills: an introduction to the geometry of fabrics.Mathematics Magazine53 (1980), 139–161

    1980

  27. [27]

    Grunbaum and G

    B. Grunbaum and G. Shephard. 1985. A catalogue of isonemal fabrics.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences440 (1985), 279–298

    1985

  28. [28]

    Grunbaum and G

    B. Grunbaum and G. Shephard. 1986. An extension to the catalogue of isonemal fabrics.Discrete Mathematics60 (1986), 155–192. http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=10139.10148

    work page arXiv 1986

  29. [29]

    Branko Grünbaum and Geoffrey C Shephard. 1988. Isonemal fabrics.The American Mathematical Monthly95, 1 (1988), 5–30

    1988

  30. [30]

    Leonidas Guibas and Jorge Stolfi. 1985. Primitives for the manipulation of general subdivisions and the computation of Voronoi.ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 4, 2 (1985), 74–123

    1985

  31. [31]

    1974.Differential Topology

    Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack. 1974.Differential Topology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA

    1974

  32. [32]

    Hoffmann

    Claude M. Hoffmann. 1989.Geometric & Solid Modeling: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, USA

    1989

  33. [33]

    Joshua Holden and Lana Holden. 2016. Modeling Braids, Cables, and Weaves with Stranded Cellular Automata. InProceedings of Bridges 2016: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Education, Culture, Eve Torrence, Bruce Torrence, Carlo Séquin, Douglas McKenna, Kristóf Fenyvesi, and Reza Sarhangi (Eds.). Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, Arizona, 127–134. htt...

    2016

  34. [34]

    Kate E Horner, Mark A Miller, Jonathan W Steed, and Paul M Sutcliffe. 2016. Knot theory in modern chemistry.Chemical Society Reviews45, 23 (2016), 6432–6448

    2016

  35. [35]

    Hyde and Myfanwy E

    Stephen T. Hyde and Myfanwy E. Evans. 2022. Symmetric tangled Platonic poly- hedra.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, 1 (2022), e2110345118. arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2110345118 https://www.pnas. org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2110345118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2110345118 2022

  36. [36]

    Hyde, Michael O’Keeffe, Davide M

    Stephen T. Hyde, Michael O’Keeffe, Davide M. Proserpio, and Ram Seshadri. 1997. The Language of Shape. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    1997

  37. [37]

    Clode, Martin Saunders, Myfanwy E

    Anna-Lee Jessop, Peta L. Clode, Martin Saunders, Myfanwy E. Evans, Stephen T. Hyde, James N. McPherson, Kasper S. Pedersen, Jacob J. K. Kirkensgaard, Nipam H. Patel, Kyle A. DeMarr, W. Owen McMillan, Bodo D. Wilts, and Gerd E. Schröder- Turk. 2025. Hierarchical woven fibrillar structures in developing single gyroids 22•Yildiz, et al. in butterflies.Procee...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2507297122 2025

  38. [38]

    2002.Surfaces in 4-Space

    Seiichi Kamada. 2002.Surfaces in 4-Space. Springer, Berlin, Germany

    2002

  39. [39]

    1987.On Knots

    LH Kauffman. 1987.On Knots. Princeton University Press, Princeton Nj

    1987

  40. [40]

    Alexander R Klotz, Caleb J Anderson, and Michael S Dimitriyev. 2024. Chirality effects in molecular chainmail.Soft Matter20, 35 (2024), 7044–7058

    2024

  41. [41]

    Chelsea E Knittel, Michael Tanis, Amy L Stoltzfus, Toen Castle, Randall D Kamien, and Genevieve Dion. 2020. Modelling textile structures using bicontinuous surfaces.Journal of Mathematics and the Arts14, 4 (2020), 331–344

    2020

  42. [42]

    Dmitri Kozlov. 2013. Structures of periodical knots and links as geometric models of complex surfaces for designing.Nexus Network Journal15, 2 (2013), 241–255

    2013

  43. [43]

    Dmitri Kozlov. 2018. Knots as a Principle of Form in Modern Art and Architecture. In2nd International Conference on Art Studies: Science, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2018). Atlantis Press, Paris, France, 367–372

    2018

  44. [44]

    Henriette Lipschütz, Martin Skrodzki, Ulrich Reitebuch, and Konrad Polthier

  45. [45]

    InProceedings of Bridges 2022: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Culture, David Reimann, Douglas Norton, and Eve Torrence (Eds.)

    Linked Knots from thegyroOperation on the Dodecahedron. InProceedings of Bridges 2022: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Culture, David Reimann, Douglas Norton, and Eve Torrence (Eds.). Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, Arizona, 175–182. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2022/bridges2022-175.html

    2022

  46. [46]

    Yuanpeng Liu, Seiichi Suzuki, Florin Isvoranu, and Mark Pauly. 2025. Double- Layered Elastic Gridshells with Locally Deployable Rotational-Surface Compo- nents. InAdvances in Architectural Geometry (AAG 2025). AAG, Vienna, Austria, 35–46. Presented at Advances in Architectural Geometry (AAG 2025), Cambridge, MA, USA. Paper available on EPFL Infoscience repository

    2025

  47. [47]

    1988.An Introduction to Solid Modeling

    Martti Mäntylä. 1988.An Introduction to Solid Modeling. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Maryland, USA

    1988

  48. [48]

    1965.Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint

    John Milnor. 1965.Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

    1965

  49. [49]

    Widianto P Moestopo, Sammy Shaker, Weiting Deng, and Julia R Greer. 2023. Knots are not for naught: Design, properties, and topology of hierarchical inter- twined microarchitected materials.Science Advances9, 10 (2023), eade6725

    2023

  50. [50]

    Lee Neuwirth. 1979. The theory of knots.Scientific American240, 6 (1979), 110–125

    1979

  51. [51]

    Lauren Niu, Geneviève Dion, and Randall D Kamien. 2025. Geometric modeling of knitted fabrics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, 7 (2025), e2416536122

    2025

  52. [52]

    Yingying Ren, Julian Panetta, Tian Chen, Florin Isvoranu, Samuel Poincloux, Christopher Brandt, Alison Martin, and Mark Pauly. 2021. 3D weaving with curved ribbons.ACM Trans. Graph.40, 4, Article 127 (July 2021), 15 pages

    2021

  53. [53]

    Rinus Roelofs. 2007. Entwined Circular Rings. InBridges Donostia: Mathemat- ics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, Reza Sarhangi and Javier Barrallo (Eds.). Tarquin Publications, London, 81–90. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2007/ bridges2007-81.html

    2007

  54. [54]

    1976.Knots and Links

    Dale Rolfsen. 1976.Knots and Links. Publish or Perish, Berkeley, CA

    1976

  55. [55]

    1995.Blender

    Ton Roosendaal and Blender Foundation. 1995.Blender. https://www.blender.org Open-source 3D creation suite

    1995

  56. [56]

    Doris Schattschneider and Wallace Walker. 1987.M. C. Escher Kaleidocycles. Ballantine Books, New York, NY, USA

    1987

  57. [57]

    Carlo H. Séquin. 2021. Polyhedral-Edge Knots. InProceedings of Bridges 2021: Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Culture, David Swart, Frank Farris, and Eve Torrence (Eds.). Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, Arizona, 63–70. http: //archive.bridgesmathart.org/2021/bridges2021-63.html

    2021

  58. [58]

    1994.The Flexagon Book

    Joseph Sherman and Paul Stewart. 1994.The Flexagon Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    1994

  59. [59]

    Krishma Singal, Michael S Dimitriyev, Sarah E Gonzalez, A Patrick Cachine, Sam Quinn, and Elisabetta A Matsumoto. 2024. Programming mechanics in knitted materials, stitch by stitch.Nature Communications15, 1 (2024), 2622

    2024

  60. [60]

    Bryant Tuckerman Stone. 1942. Flexagons.Scientific American167, 6 (1942), 246–250

    1942

  61. [62]

    Peter G. Tait. 1877. On Links.Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh28, 9 (1877), 321–332. doi:10.1017/S0080456800090633

    work page doi:10.1017/s0080456800090633

  62. [63]

    Tom Verhoeff and Koos Verhoeff. 2011. From Chain-link Fence to Space-Spanning Mathematical Structures. InProceedings of Bridges 2011: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, Reza Sarhangi and Carlo H. Séquin (Eds.). Tessellations Publishing, Phoenix, Arizona, 73–80. http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2011/ bridges2011-73.html

    2011

  63. [64]

    1999.The Physics of Foams

    Denis Weaire and Robert Phelan. 1999.The Physics of Foams. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    1999

  64. [65]

    Kevin J. Weiler. 1986.Topological structures for geometric modeling (boundary representation, manifold, radial edge structure). Ph. D. Dissertation. Rensse- laer Polytechnic Institute. http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=https: //www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/topological-structures-geometric- modeling/docview/303506577/se-2 Copyright - Databas...

    work page arXiv 1986

  65. [66]

    Wikipedia contributors. 2025. Medial graph — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medial_graph. [Online; accessed 17-January-2026]

    2025

  66. [67]

    Qing Xing, Ergun Akleman, Jianer Chen, and Jonathan L. Gross. 2010. Single- cycle Plain-Woven Objects. In2010 Shape Modeling International Conference. IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, 90–99

    2010

  67. [68]

    Hong-Bin Yang, Seiichi Suzuki, and Mark Pauly. 2025. Topological generation of woven nodes for double-layered elastic gridshells built from deployable cylindrical components. InAdvances in Architectural Geometry (AAG 2025). AAG, Vienna, Austria, 47–58. Presented at Advances in Architectural Geometry (AAG 2025), Cambridge, MA, USA. Paper available on EPFL ...

    2025

  68. [69]

    Tolga Yildiz and Ergun Akleman. 2024. Volumetric nonwoven structures: An algebraic framework for systematic design of infinite polyhedral frames using nonwoven fabric patterns.Computers & Graphics4, 8 (2024), 103979

    2024

  69. [70]

    Tolga Yildiz and Ergun Akleman. 2025. Triply periodic mesh-based linked- structures: Design and construction of a family of periodic links based on Bravais lattices and corresponding Wigner-Seitz cells.Computers & Graphics132 (2025), 104369. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849325002109

    2025

  70. [71]

    Tolga T Yildiz, Alice C Niemeyer, Vinayak R Krishnamurthy, and Er- gun Akleman. 2025. A constructive framework for discovery, design, and classification of volumetric Bravais weaves.PNAS Nexus4, 8 (07 2025), pgaf219. arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article- pdf/4/8/pgaf219/63794488/pgaf219.pdf https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/ pgaf219

    work page doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/ 2025

  71. [72]

    Akira Yoshimoto. 1971. An Amusing Cube.Mathematics Magazine44, 2 (1971), 87–89

    1971

  72. [73]

    Yuwen Zhang and Nadrian C. Seeman. 1994. Construction of a DNA-Truncated Octahedron.Journal of the American Chemical Society116, 5 (1994), 1661–1669. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00084a006 doi:10.1021/ja00084a006 Received 20 February 2007; revised 12 March 2009; accepted 5 June 2009

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00084a006 1994