pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12349 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: unknown

Responsible Trauma Research: Designing Effective and Sustainable Virtual Reality Exposure Studies

Annalisa Degenhard, Enrico Rukzio, Fotis Liarokapis, Jennifer Spohrs, Sophia Ppali, Stefan Tschoeke

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords virtual reality exposure therapycomplex PTSDfeasibility studytrauma researchstakeholder safetyresearch ethicsmethodological guidelinesexposure stimuli
0
0 comments X

The pith

A feasibility study finds that simple virtual objects trigger effective exposure for complex PTSD, but involving developers in sessions creates emotional risks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper describes a feasibility study that integrated virtual reality exposure therapy into treatment for complex PTSD, a condition that needs highly personal triggers unlike standard PTSD. Researchers worked with 11 patients, two therapists, and a VR developer to create individualized stimuli while tracking effects on everyone involved. They observed that basic virtual items worked as well as detailed scenes for helping patients access and process memories, that feeling immersed in the VR did not predict better outcomes, and that the process of designing the content itself became a helpful part of therapy. At the same time, having the developer sit in on therapy sessions led to stress and confusion about roles, prompting advice on how to structure such studies safely. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to simpler, more ethical ways to use VR in trauma care without adding unnecessary technical demands or harming the research team.

Core claim

The authors establish through their feasibility study that virtual reality exposure therapy can be adapted for complex PTSD by using simple, individualized virtual objects rather than elaborate scenes, that therapeutic progress does not depend on high levels of VR presence, and that the collaborative design of those objects functions as an active part of treatment instead of mere preparation. They also document that including the VR developer directly in patient sessions produced substantial emotional stress and role confusion for the developer, requiring new boundaries. From these observations they derive methodological recommendations aimed at keeping VRET effective for patients while also

What carries the argument

The feasibility study that places VR design work inside therapy sessions for complex PTSD patients while monitoring impacts on therapists and the developer.

If this is right

  • Simple virtual objects can replace complex scenes, which reduces the time and technical skill needed to prepare exposure materials.
  • The act of designing virtual triggers alongside a therapist can itself promote memory access and emotional processing.
  • Therapeutic benefit in this setting does not require high immersion, so researchers can avoid expensive hardware or detailed environments.
  • Developers should be kept out of direct therapy sessions to prevent emotional overload and role conflicts.
  • Future VRET protocols should embed safety checks for all participants across every stage of planning, creation, and delivery.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Minimalist VR designs may prove more practical for other mental-health applications where cost and complexity currently limit access.
  • Testing patient-only design sessions without any developer present could clarify whether the observed benefits hold when the technical expert is fully separated.
  • The finding that design work itself helps suggests exploring VR creation as a therapeutic activity independent of later exposure sessions.
  • Without follow-up data beyond the initial sessions, it remains unclear how long the benefits from these simple exposures last in daily life.

Load-bearing premise

That patterns seen in just eleven patients and two therapists, without any comparison group or long-term tracking, can support general guidelines for safe virtual reality exposure therapy.

What would settle it

A follow-up trial that randomly assigns patients to simple versus complex VR scenes, measures symptom change over six months, and tracks developer stress levels would show whether simple objects truly match complex ones or whether direct developer involvement is required for success.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12349 by Annalisa Degenhard, Enrico Rukzio, Fotis Liarokapis, Jennifer Spohrs, Sophia Ppali, Stefan Tschoeke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A typical setting of a virtual reality exposure session with a developer involved. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Procedure of our study showing which stakeholders were involved in the different processes of the study. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The patients who participated in our study, including pseudonym, age, gender, trauma type (f = female, m = male, CT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The journeys of Robert, Peter, Marc, and Natalie. Each journey shows key stages of the respective patient from trauma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The different stages of the conversion of Natalie’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of Robert’s and Peter’s first gradation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) enables controlled exposure to trauma-related stimuli to facilitate memory access and emotional processing. However, the field remains underexplored for complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD). Unlike single-trauma PTSD, C-PTSD requires highly individualized triggers that are difficult to identify and implement safely. We conducted a feasibility study with 11 patients, two trauma therapists, and a VR developer to explore integrating VRET into C-PTSD treatment while safeguarding all stakeholders. Initial findings indicate that simple objects can be just as effective as complex scenes, therapeutic success does not correlate with VR presence levels, and the design process itself became integral to therapy rather than preparatory. However, involving developers in therapy sessions led to considerable emotional stress and role confusion, which required a cautious approach. Based on these insights, we provide methodological recommendations for safe and patient-centered VRET studies that balance therapeutic effectiveness with stakeholder safety across the research process.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a feasibility study with 11 C-PTSD patients, two trauma therapists, and one VR developer exploring safe integration of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET). It presents initial observations that simple virtual objects match complex scenes in effectiveness, therapeutic success shows no correlation with VR presence, the co-design process itself functions as therapy, and developer involvement in sessions causes emotional stress and role confusion. From these patterns the authors derive methodological recommendations for responsible, patient-centered VRET research that balances effectiveness with stakeholder safety.

Significance. If the observed patterns hold beyond this cohort, the work could meaningfully advance ethical guidelines for VRET in complex trauma by demonstrating the viability of simplified VR stimuli, the therapeutic value of participatory design, and the necessity of protecting non-clinical team members. This addresses a documented gap in C-PTSD applications and supplies concrete, stakeholder-informed practices that could lower barriers to responsible VR adoption in clinical HCI research.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the methodological recommendations rest on patterns observed in an uncontrolled feasibility study (n=11 patients, 2 therapists) with no randomization, control arm, pre-registered outcomes, or validated quantitative symptom measures; this makes it impossible to separate stable properties of VRET from individual or cohort-specific factors, directly weakening the load-bearing claim that simple objects are 'just as effective' and that presence levels can be deprioritized.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / implied Results: the statement that 'therapeutic success does not correlate with VR presence levels' is presented without any description of how presence or success were operationalized, scored, or compared, leaving the recommendation to favor lower-presence setups without an evidentiary anchor.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the limitations of the small, qualitative sample and absence of long-term follow-up could be stated more explicitly so readers immediately contextualize the scope of the recommendations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our feasibility study. We agree that the abstract must more accurately convey the preliminary, observational character of the work and have revised it accordingly. Below we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the methodological recommendations rest on patterns observed in an uncontrolled feasibility study (n=11 patients, 2 therapists) with no randomization, control arm, pre-registered outcomes, or validated quantitative symptom measures; this makes it impossible to separate stable properties of VRET from individual or cohort-specific factors, directly weakening the load-bearing claim that simple objects are 'just as effective' and that presence levels can be deprioritized.

    Authors: We accept this assessment. The study is explicitly a small-scale, uncontrolled feasibility investigation and does not support causal or generalizable claims. We have revised the abstract to replace the phrasing 'simple objects can be just as effective' and 'therapeutic success does not correlate' with 'preliminary observations suggest' and to present the methodological recommendations as hypotheses for future controlled research rather than established findings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / implied Results: the statement that 'therapeutic success does not correlate with VR presence levels' is presented without any description of how presence or success were operationalized, scored, or compared, leaving the recommendation to favor lower-presence setups without an evidentiary anchor.

    Authors: We agree the abstract omitted necessary detail. Presence was assessed via post-session semi-structured interviews and therapist notes on patient immersion and engagement; therapeutic success was gauged through qualitative reports of emotional processing and distress reduction. No quantitative scales or statistical correlations were applied given the sample size. We have added a concise clause in the revised abstract noting that these are qualitative observations and have inserted a pointer to the Methods section for fuller description. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct observational data

full rationale

The paper reports a feasibility study whose central claims (simple objects matching complex scenes, no correlation between success and presence, design process as therapy, developer involvement risks) are presented as direct patterns observed in sessions with 11 patients and 2 therapists. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the derivation chain; methodological recommendations follow from the reported observations without any reduction to inputs by construction. The study is self-contained against external benchmarks as a qualitative feasibility report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative feasibility study in human-computer interaction with no mathematical models, fitted parameters, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1004 out tokens · 36982 ms · 2026-05-10T15:25:17.189808+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

151 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ICH E6 (R2) Good Clinical Practice - Scientific Guideline | European Medicines Agency (EMA)

    1997. ICH E6 (R2) Good Clinical Practice - Scientific Guideline | European Medicines Agency (EMA). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-e6-r2-good- clinical-practice-scientific-guideline

  2. [2]

    xliv, 947 pages

    2013.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5â„¢, 5th Ed.American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA, US. xliv, 947 pages. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

  3. [3]

    Reem Alnanih and Olga Ormandjieva. 2016. Mapping HCI Principles to Design Quality of Mobile User Interfaces in Healthcare Applications.Procedia Computer Science94 (Jan. 2016), 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.08.014

  4. [4]

    Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Chasing Play Potentials: Towards an Increasingly Situated and Emergent Approach to Everyday Play Design. InProceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, San Diego CA USA, 1265–1277. doi:10.1145/3322276.3322325

  5. [5]

    Rothbaum, and Larry F

    Page Anderson, Barbara O. Rothbaum, and Larry F. Hodges. 2003. VR Exposure in the Treatment of Social Anxiety.Cognitive and Behavioral Practice10, 3 (June 2003), 240–247. doi:10.1016/S1077-7229(03)80036-6

  6. [6]

    Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna StÃ¥hl, Kristina HÃ⁄pilcrowÃ⁄pilcrowk, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick

    Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Rachel E. Clarke, Charles Windlin, Anna StÃ¥hl, Kristina HÃ⁄pilcrowÃ⁄pilcrowk, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Emotion Work in Experience- Centered Design. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300832

  7. [7]

    Bowen, and Annette Semanchin Jones

    Annahita Ball, Elizabeth A. Bowen, and Annette Semanchin Jones. 2021. Inte- grating Trauma-Informed Care and Collective Impact: Perspectives of Service Providers Working with Cross-System Youth.Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research12, 1 (March 2021), 59–81. doi:10.1086/712960 Publisher: The University of Chicago Press

  8. [8]

    Albert Bandura. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychol. Rev.84, 2 (1977), 191–215

  9. [9]

    Albert Bandura. 1989. Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.Developmental psychology25, 5 (1989), 729. Design for Effective but Sustainable Virtual Reality Exposure Studies CHI ’26, April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain

  10. [10]

    Rosa Baños, Cristina Botella, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, Helena Villa, Conxa Perpiñá, and M Gallardo. 1999. Psychological Variables and Reality Judgment in Virtual Environments: The Roles of Absorption and Dissociation.Cyberpsy- chology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society2 (Feb. 1999), 143–8. doi:1...

  11. [11]

    Beidel, B

    D. Beidel, B. Frueh, Sandra M. Neer, Clint A. Bowers, Benjamin J Trachik, T. W. Uhde, and Anouk L. Grubaugh. 2017. Trauma management therapy with virtual-reality augmented exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of anxiety disorders61 (2017), 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.005

  12. [12]

    Benbow and Page L

    Amanda A. Benbow and Page L. Anderson. 2019. A Meta-Analytic Examination of Attrition in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders.Journal of Anxiety Disorders61 (Jan. 2019), 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.006

  13. [13]

    Benight and Albert Bandura

    Charles C. Benight and Albert Bandura. 2004. Social Cognitive Theory of Posttraumatic Recovery: The Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy.Behaviour Research and Therapy42, 10 (2004), 1129–1148. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008

  14. [14]

    Dorthe Berntsen and David C Rubin. 2007. When a trauma becomes a key to identity: Enhanced integration of trauma memories predicts posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.Applied cognitive psychology21, 4 (2007), 417–431

  15. [15]

    Jo Billings and Helen Nicholls. 2025. PTSD and complex PTSD, current treat- ments and debates: a review of reviews.British Medical Bulletin156, 1 (2025), ldaf015. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaf015

  16. [16]

    Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott, Debbie Cavers, Christine Campbell, and Fiona Walter

  17. [17]

    2016), 1802–1811

    Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?Qualitative Health Research26, 13 (Nov. 2016), 1802–1811. doi:10.1177/1049732316654870

  18. [18]

    Limberger, Ingrid Frank, Ulrike; Sender, Tanja Grat- wohl, and Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz

    Martin Bohus, Matthias F. Limberger, Ingrid Frank, Ulrike; Sender, Tanja Grat- wohl, and Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz. 2001. Entwicklung der Borderline- Symptom- Liste.Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol51, 05 (Dec. 2001), 201–211. doi:10. 1055/s-2001-13281

  19. [19]

    Martin Bohus and Ruben Vonderlin. 2024. Dialektisch Behaviorale Thera- pie Für Komplexe Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung (DBT-PTBS): Ein Evi- denzbasiertes Störungsspezfisches Behandlungsprogramm.Der Nervenarzt95, 7 (July 2024), 630–638. doi:10.1007/s00115-024-01680-y

  20. [20]

    Karen Bontempo and Karen Malcolm. 2012. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.In Our Hands. Educating Healthcare Interpreters(2012), 105–130

  21. [22]

    Cristina Botella, Berenice Serrano, Rosa Baños, and Azucena GarcÃa-Palacios

  22. [23]

    Virtual reality exposure-based therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a review of its efficacy, the adequacy of the treatment protocol, and its acceptability.Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment11 (2015), 2533 –

  23. [24]

    doi:10.2147/NDT.S89542

  24. [25]

    Deborah J Bowen, Matthew Kreuter, Bonnie Spring, Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel, Laura Linnan, Diane Weiner, Suzanne Bakken, Cecilia Patrick Kaplan, Linda Squiers, Cecilia Fabrizio, et al. 2009. How We Design Feasibility Studies.Ameri- can journal of preventive medicine36, 5 (2009), 452–457. doi:10.1016/j.amepre. 2009.02.002

  25. [26]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11, 4 (Aug. 2019), 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

  26. [27]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology18, 3 (2021), 328–352. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 Place: United Kingdom Publisher: Taylor & Francis

  27. [28]

    Chris R Brewin, Lukoye Atwoli, Jonathan I Bisson, Sandro Galea, Karestan Koenen, and Roberto Lewis-Fernández. 2025. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Evolving Conceptualization and Evidence, and Future Research Directions. World Psychiatry24, 1 (2025), 52–80. doi:10.1002/wps.21269

  28. [29]

    Brian E Bride. 2007. Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among social workers.Social work52, 1 (2007), 63–70

  29. [30]

    Fiona Campbell, Lindsay Blank, Anna Cantrell, Susan Baxter, Christopher Black- more, Jan Dixon, and Elizabeth Goyder. 2022. Factors that influence mental health of university and college students in the UK: a systematic review.BMC Public Health22, 1 (2022), 1778

  30. [31]

    Emily Carl, Aliza T Stein, Andrew Levihn-Coon, Jamie R Pogue, Barbara Roth- baum, Paul Emmelkamp, Gordon J G Asmundson, Per Carlbring, and Mark B Powers. 2019. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J. Anxiety Disord.61 (Jan. 2019), 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003

  31. [32]

    Hoffman, and Suzanne J

    Albert Carlin, Hunter G. Hoffman, and Suzanne J. Weghorst. 1997. Virtual Reality and Tactile Augmentation in the Treatment of Spider Phobia: A Case Report.Behaviour research and therapy35 2 (1997), 153–8. doi:10.1016/S0005- 7967(96)00085-X

  32. [33]

    Valentina Cesari, Sergio Frumento, Andrea Leo, Marina Baroni, Grazia Rutigliano, Angelo Gemignani, and Danilo Menicucci. 2023. Functional Cor- relates of Subliminal Stimulation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Affective Disorders337 (2023), 175–185. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.047

  33. [34]

    Stevie Chancellor, Nazanin Andalibi, Lindsay Blackwell, David Nemer, and Wendy Moncur. 2019. Sensitive Research, Practice and Design in HCI. InEx- tended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. doi:10.1145/3290607.3299003

  34. [35]

    2016.Autoethnography as Method(1 ed.)

    Heewon Chang. 2016.Autoethnography as Method(1 ed.). Routledge, New York

  35. [36]

    P. F. C. Charlton and J. A. Thompson. 1996. Ways of Coping with Psychological Distress after Trauma.British Journal of Clinical Psychology35, 4 (Nov. 1996), 517–530. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01208.x

  36. [37]

    James Chu and Diana Dill. 1990. Dissociative Symptoms in Relation to Childhood Physical and Sexual Abuse.The American journal of psychiatry147 (Aug. 1990), 887–92. doi:10.1176/ajp.147.7.887

  37. [38]

    Larsen, Morten Kyng, and Marit Kirkevold

    Jane Clemensen, Simon B. Larsen, Morten Kyng, and Marit Kirkevold. 2007. Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology.Qualitative Health Research17, 1 (Jan. 2007), 122–130. doi:10.1177/1049732306293664

  38. [39]

    Marylene Cloitre, Christine A Courtois, Anthony Charuvastra, Richard Cara- pezza, Bradley C Stolbach, and Bonnie L Green. 2011. Treatment of complex PTSD: Results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey on best practices.Journal of traumatic stress24, 6 (2011), 615–627

  39. [40]

    Garvert, Brandon Weiss, Eve B

    Maryléne Cloitre, Donn W. Garvert, Brandon Weiss, Eve B. Carlson, and Richard A. Bryant. 2014. Distinguishing PTSD, Complex PTSD, and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Latent Class Analysis.European Journal of Psychotrau- matology5 (2014)

  40. [41]

    Craske, Michael Treanor, Christopher C

    Michelle G. Craske, Michael Treanor, Christopher C. Conway, Tomislav Zbozinek, and Bram Vervliet. 2014. Maximizing Exposure Therapy: An In- hibitory Learning Approach.Behaviour Research and Therapy58 (2014), 10–23. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006

  41. [42]

    Cody Cushing, Hakwan Lau, Stefan Hofmann, Joseph Ledoux, and Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel. 2024. Metacognition as a window into subjective affective experience.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences78 (06 2024). doi:10. 1111/pcn.13683

  42. [43]

    Annalisa Degenhard, Stefan TschÃ⁄pilcrowke, Michael Rietzler, and Enrico Rukzio

  43. [44]

    arXiv:2505.20796 [cs.HC] https://arxiv.org/ abs/2505.20796

    Describe Me Something You Do Not Remember - Challenges and Risks of Exposure Design Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Therapy of Complex Post-traumatic Disorder. arXiv:2505.20796 [cs.HC] https://arxiv.org/ abs/2505.20796

  44. [45]

    Joann Difede, Judith Cukor, Nimali Jayasinghe, Ivy Patt, Sharon Jedel, Lisa Spielman, Cezar Giosan, and Hunter Hoffman. 2007. Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Following Sep- tember 11, 2001.The Journal of clinical psychiatry68 (Nov. 2007), 1639–47. doi:10.4088/JCP.v68n1102

  45. [46]

    Hoffman, and Nimale Jaysinghe

    JoAnn Difede, Hunter G. Hoffman, and Nimale Jaysinghe. 2002. Innovative Use of Virtual Reality Technology in the Treatment of PTSD in the Aftermath of September 11.Psychiatric services53 9 (2002), 1083–5. doi:10.1176/APPI.PS.53.9. 1083

  46. [47]

    Sara Donetto, Paola Pierri, Vicki Tsianakas, and Glenn Robert. 2015. Experience- based Co-design and Healthcare Improvement: Realizing Participatory De- sign in the Public Sector.The Design Journal18, 2 (June 2015), 227–

  47. [48]

    doi:10.2752/175630615X14212498964312 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.2752/175630615X14212498964312

  48. [49]

    Dunsmoor, Josh M

    Joseph E. Dunsmoor, Josh M. Cisler, Gregory A. Fonzo, Suzannah K. Creech, and Charles B. Nemeroff. 2022. Laboratory Models of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: The Elusive Bridge to Translation.Neuron110, 11 (June 2022), 1754–

  49. [50]

    doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.001

  50. [51]

    Sydney Edwards. 2018. User Centered Simplicity: A Design Mani- festo. https://medium.com/@edwar3se/user-centered-simplicity-a-design- manifesto-21f92402894d

  51. [52]

    Paul Emmelkamp, Mary Bruynzeel, Leonie Drost, and C Mast. 2001. Virtual Re- ality Treatment in Acrophobia: A Comparison with Exposure in Vivo.Cyberpsy- chology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society4 (July 2001), 335–9. doi:10.1089/109493101300210222

  52. [53]

    Feuston, Arpita Bhattacharya, Nazanin Andalibi, Elizabeth A

    Jessica L. Feuston, Arpita Bhattacharya, Nazanin Andalibi, Elizabeth A. Ankrah, Sheena Erete, Mark Handel, Wendy Moncur, Sarah Vieweg, and Jed R. Brubaker

  53. [54]

    InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

    Researcher Wellbeing and Best Practices in Emotionally Demanding Research. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–6. doi:10.1145/3491101.3503742

  54. [55]

    1995.Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those who Treat the Traumatized

    Charles R Figley. 1995.Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those who Treat the Traumatized. Number 23. Psychology Press. CHI ’26, April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain Degenhard et al

  55. [56]

    Edna Foa and M.J. Kozak. 1986. Emotional Processing of Fear. Exposure to Corrective Information.Psychological bulletin99 (Jan. 1986), 20. doi:10.1037/ /0033-2909.99.1.20

  56. [57]

    Julian D. Ford. 2018. Trauma Memory Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disor- der Psychotherapy: A Unifying Framework.Journal of Traumatic Stress31, 6 (Dec. 2018), 933–942. doi:10.1002/jts.22344

  57. [58]

    Joseph Glicksohn and Michal Avnon. 1997. Explorations in Virtual Reality: Absorption, Cognition and Altered State of Consciousness.Imagination, Cogni- tion and Personality17, 2 (Oct. 1997), 141–151. doi:10.2190/FTUU-GLC5-GBT8- 9RUW

  58. [59]

    Ana Lúcia Gonçalves, Raquel andPedrozo, Evandro S. F. Coutinho, Ivan Figueira, and Paula Ventura. 2012. Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in the Treatment of PTSD: A Systematic Review.PLoS ONE7 (2012). doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0048469

  59. [60]

    S M Haft and A M Sherrill. 2025. Virtual reality exposure.The Sage Encyclopedia of Mood and Anxiety Disorders3 (2025), 1401–1403

  60. [61]

    Johan Melander Hagborg, Torbjörn Kalin, and Arne Gerdner. 2022. The Child- hood Trauma Questionnaire—Short Form (CTQ-SF) Used with Adolescents – Methodological Report from Clinical and Community Samples.Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma15, 4 (Dec. 2022), 1199–1213. doi:10.1007/s40653-022- 00443-8

  61. [62]

    Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 216:1–216:25. doi:10.1145/3359318

  62. [63]

    Sandra Harris, Robert Kemmerling, and Max North. 2003. Brief Virtual Reality Therapy for Public Speaking Anxiety.Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society5 (Jan. 2003), 543–50. doi:10.1089/109493102321018187

  63. [64]

    2015.Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror

    Judith Herman. 2015.Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group, New York, NY, US. Pages: ix, 326

  64. [65]

    Judith Lewis Herman. 1992. Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of pro- longed and repeated trauma.Journal of Traumatic Stress5, 3 (1992), 377–391. doi:10.1002/jts.2490050305

  65. [66]

    J. L. Herman and E. Schatzow. 1987. Recovery and Verification of Memories of Childhood Sexual Trauma.Psychoanalytic Psychology4, 1 (1987)

  66. [67]

    Hodges, R

    L.F. Hodges, R. Kooper, T.C. Meyer, B.O. Rothbaum, D. Opdyke, J.J. de Graaff, J.S. Williford, and M.M. North. 1995. Virtual Environments for Treating the Fear of Heights.Computer28, 7 (July 1995), 27–34. doi:10.1109/2.391038

  67. [68]

    Thole H Hoppen, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Ahlke Kip, Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland, and Nexhmedin Morina. 2024. The Efficacy of Psychological In- terventions for Adult Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Exposure to Single versus Multiple Traumatic Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Con- trolled Trials.The Lancet Psychiatry11, 2 (2024), 112–122. doi:...

  68. [69]

    Maarten Houben, Minha Lee, Sarah Foley, Kellie Morrissey, and Rens Brankaert

  69. [70]

    InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’24)

    HCI Research in Sensitive Settings: Learning Researcher Reflexivity, Ethical Conduct and Empathy in Participatory Design Approaches. InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. doi:10. 1145/3613905.3636280

  70. [71]

    Larke N Huang, Rebecca Flatow, Tenly Biggs, Sara Afayee, Kelley Smith, Thomas Clark, and Mary Blake. 2014. SAMHSA’s Concept of Truama and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. (2014)

  71. [72]

    Philip Hyland, Mark Shevlin, Claire Fyvie, Marylène Cloitre, and Thanos Karatzias. 2020. The relationship between ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD and dissociative experiences.Journal of Trauma & Dissociation21, 1 (2020), 62–72

  72. [73]

    Sharon Rae Jenkins and Stephanie Baird. 2002. Secondary traumatic stress and vicarious trauma: A validational study.Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies15, 5 (2002), 423–432

  73. [74]

    Jongedijk

    Ruud A. Jongedijk. 2014. Narrative exposure therapy: an evidence-based treat- ment for multiple and complex trauma.European Journal of Psychotraumatology 5 (Dec. 2014), 10.3402/ejpt.v5.26522. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v5.26522

  74. [75]

    Naomi Josman, Ayelet Reisberg, Patrice Weiss, Azucena Garcia-Palacios, and Hunter Hoffman. 2008. BusWorld: An Analog Pilot Test of a Virtual Environment Designed to Treat Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Originating from a Terrorist Suicide Bomb Attack.Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and soc...

  75. [76]

    Naomi Josman, Eli Somer, Ayelet Reisberg, Patrice Weiss, Azucena Garcia- Palacios, and Hunter Hoffman. 2006. BusWorld: Designing a Virtual Environ- ment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Israel: A Protocol.Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society9 (May 2006), 241–4. doi:10.1089/cpb...

  76. [77]

    Thanos Karatzias, Marylene Cloitre, Andreas Maercker, Evaldas Kazlauskas, Mark Shevlin, Philip Hyland, Jonathan I Bisson, Neil P Roberts, and Chris R Brewin. 2017. PTSD and Complex PTSD: ICD-11 updates on concept and measurement in the UK, USA, Germany and Lithuania.European journal of psychotraumatology8, sup7 (2017), 1418103

  77. [78]

    Jeongeun Kim and Hyeoun-Ae Park. 2012. Development of a Health Information Technology Acceptance Model Using Consumers’ Health Behavior Intention.J Med Internet Res14, 5 (Oct. 2012), e133. pubmed:23026508 doi:10.2196/jmir.2143

  78. [79]

    Kothgassner, Helge HÃ⁄pilcrowllmer, Robert-Jacek Gorzka, and Holger Schulz

    Thiemo Knaust, Anna Felnhofer, Oswald D. Kothgassner, Helge HÃ⁄pilcrowllmer, Robert-Jacek Gorzka, and Holger Schulz. 2020. Virtual Trauma Interventions for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorders: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in Psychology11 (Nov. 2020), 562506. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562506

  79. [80]

    Kushniruk and Vimla L

    Andre W. Kushniruk and Vimla L. Patel. 2004. Cognitive and usability engi- neering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.Journal of Biomedical Informatics37, 1 (Feb. 2004), 56–76. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003

  80. [81]

    Ruth A Lanius, Daniela Rabellino, Jenna E Boyd, Sherain Harricharan, Paul A Frewen, and Margaret C McKinnon. 2017. The Innate Alarm System in PTSD: Conscious and Subconscious Processing of Threat.Current Opinion in Psychology 14 (2017), 109–115. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.11.006

Showing first 80 references.