pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.12886 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 💻 cs.CE

Recognition: unknown

The cross-sectional warping problem for hyperelastic beams: An efficient formulation in Voigt notation

Juan C. Alzate Cobo, Oliver Weeger, Tobias Henkels

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE
keywords hyperelastic beamscross-sectional warpingVoigt notationmaterial formulationGreen-Lagrange strainsecond Piola-Kirchhoff stressisogeometric finite elementsbeam constitutive laws
0
0 comments X

The pith

The cross-sectional warping problem for hyperelastic beams can be restated entirely in the material description using Green-Lagrange strains and second Piola-Kirchhoff stresses, then written compactly in Voigt notation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reinterprets the warping problem so that the unknown displacement field over the beam cross-section is found without ever leaving the reference configuration. It replaces the usual mix of spatial and material quantities with only the Green-Lagrange strain and the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress, both of which are symmetric. Symmetry lets the governing equations collapse into Voigt notation, which removes redundant components and simplifies coding in finite-element software. The reformulation yields general nonlinear beam constitutive relations that no longer require small-strain or rigid-section assumptions. Numerical examples, including direct calculation of effective stiffnesses via warping sensitivities, confirm that the new equations produce the same results as earlier mixed formulations.

Core claim

The cross-sectional warping problem for hyperelastic beams is reinterpreted as a fully material formulation expressed in terms of the Green-Lagrange strain and the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors. Owing to the symmetry of these tensors, the formulation is expressed efficiently in Voigt notation, making it particularly well-suited for numerical implementation in isogeometric finite elements. The validity is demonstrated through numerical examples that include computation of effective beam stiffness using sensitivities of the warping displacement.

What carries the argument

The fully material formulation of the cross-sectional warping displacement field expressed via Green-Lagrange strain and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors and reduced to Voigt notation.

If this is right

  • Effective beam stiffness matrices are obtained directly by differentiating the warping solution with respect to the beam strain measures.
  • The same warping equations apply without change to any hyperelastic constitutive law, removing the need for separate small-strain derivations.
  • Only symmetric-tensor operations are required, which reduces both storage and arithmetic cost in the finite-element code.
  • The open-source isogeometric implementation allows immediate reproduction and extension to new material models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The material-only description could simplify coupling of beam models to full three-dimensional domains at ends or joints where spatial coordinates become inconvenient.
  • Similar symmetry-driven reductions in Voigt notation may apply to warping or thickness-stretch problems in hyperelastic plates and shells.
  • Because the formulation never refers to the deformed configuration, it may combine more cleanly with large-rotation beam theories that already track material frames.

Load-bearing premise

The warping problem remains well-posed and yields a unique displacement field when written entirely in the material description for arbitrary hyperelastic materials.

What would settle it

A specific hyperelastic constitutive law and cross-section geometry for which the finite-element solution of the warping equations either fails to converge to a unique field or produces visibly different warping displacements than the established mixed formulation.

read the original abstract

Beam theory has traditionally been restricted to small elastic strains and rigid cross-sections. Relaxing these assumptions within closed-form analytical frameworks remains challenging. In contrast, the cross-sectional warping problem provides a computational approach that enables the derivation of general, nonlinear constitutive relations for beam models, thereby overcoming both limitations. In this work, we reinterpret the cross-sectional warping problem for hyperelastic beams and propose a fully material formulation in terms of the Green-Lagrange strain and the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors. Owing to the symmetry of these tensors, the formulation can be expressed efficiently in Voigt notation and is thus particularly well-suited for straightforward numerical implementation. We demonstrate the validity of this alternative formulation in numerical examples, including the computation of the effective beam stiffness, for which we derive the sensitivities of the warping displacement. To promote reproducibility, we accompany this article with an open-access repository containing the isogeometric finite element implementation and all numerical examples presented herein, enabling other researchers to readily reproduce and build upon our results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reinterprets the cross-sectional warping problem for hyperelastic beams as a fully material formulation expressed via the Green-Lagrange strain E and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress S tensors. Symmetry permits an efficient Voigt notation representation suitable for numerical implementation. Validity is asserted through numerical examples that include computation of effective beam stiffness together with warping-displacement sensitivities; an open-access repository supplies the isogeometric finite-element code and all examples.

Significance. If the formulation is shown to be well-posed for general hyperelastic materials, the work supplies a practical route to nonlinear beam constitutive relations that relaxes both the small-strain and rigid-cross-section assumptions. The explicit provision of open, reproducible code is a clear strength that facilitates adoption and extension in computational mechanics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / material formulation section] Abstract and the section presenting the material formulation: the claim that the warping problem remains well-posed and yields a unique displacement field for arbitrary hyperelastic constitutive laws rests only on numerical examples. No analysis of strong ellipticity, polyconvexity, or coercivity of the resulting variational problem is supplied. For stored-energy functions that lose rank-one convexity at finite strain, the nonlinear system for the warping field w can admit multiple solutions or none, undermining the asserted generality.
  2. [Numerical examples section] Numerical examples section: the abstract states that the examples (including effective-stiffness computation) demonstrate validity, yet no quantitative error measures, convergence studies, or comparisons against existing spatial formulations or analytical limits are reported. Without these baselines the efficiency and accuracy claims cannot be independently verified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation while remaining faithful to the scope of the work.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / material formulation section] Abstract and the section presenting the material formulation: the claim that the warping problem remains well-posed and yields a unique displacement field for arbitrary hyperelastic constitutive laws rests only on numerical examples. No analysis of strong ellipticity, polyconvexity, or coercivity of the resulting variational problem is supplied. For stored-energy functions that lose rank-one convexity at finite strain, the nonlinear system for the warping field w can admit multiple solutions or none, undermining the asserted generality.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not supply a rigorous analysis of strong ellipticity, polyconvexity or coercivity of the warping variational problem for completely arbitrary hyperelastic stored-energy functions. The derivation is performed under the standing assumption that the constitutive law satisfies the usual conditions (strong ellipticity, rank-one convexity) that guarantee uniqueness of the warping field for the materials of practical interest. The numerical examples are restricted to such models (neo-Hookean and similar). We will revise the abstract and the material-formulation section to state these assumptions explicitly and to qualify the generality claim, noting that loss of rank-one convexity can indeed render the problem ill-posed. A full mathematical treatment of coercivity for arbitrary hyperelastic laws lies outside the intended scope of the paper, which focuses on the efficient Voigt reformulation and its implementation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical examples section] Numerical examples section: the abstract states that the examples (including effective-stiffness computation) demonstrate validity, yet no quantitative error measures, convergence studies, or comparisons against existing spatial formulations or analytical limits are reported. Without these baselines the efficiency and accuracy claims cannot be independently verified.

    Authors: We accept that the current numerical section does not contain quantitative error norms, mesh-convergence studies or direct comparisons with spatial formulations or analytical limits. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) convergence plots of the warping displacement in appropriate norms under successive mesh refinement; (ii) tables comparing the computed effective beam stiffness against small-strain analytical solutions and against published results obtained with spatial formulations; (iii) quantitative error measures for all presented examples. These additions will make the accuracy and efficiency claims verifiable. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A complete mathematical proof of well-posedness (strong ellipticity, coercivity, uniqueness) of the warping problem for arbitrary hyperelastic constitutive laws.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: formulation and sensitivities are independently derived from standard hyperelastic kinematics

full rationale

The paper reinterprets the warping problem in material coordinates using E and S, exploits tensor symmetry for Voigt notation, and derives analytic sensitivities of the warping field w with respect to the beam strain measures. These steps are direct consequences of the variational statement and the chain rule applied to the hyperelastic energy; they do not reduce to any fitted parameter, self-citation, or prior ansatz that is itself defined by the target result. Numerical examples serve only as validation, not as the source of the claimed relations. No load-bearing step collapses to an input by construction, so the derivation chain remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract: the formulation rests on standard continuum-mechanics identities (symmetry of Green-Lagrange strain and 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff stress) and the well-posedness of the warping problem for hyperelastic materials; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Symmetry of Green-Lagrange strain and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors allows reduction to Voigt notation
    Invoked to justify efficiency of the formulation (abstract).
  • domain assumption The cross-sectional warping problem admits a unique solution for hyperelastic beams
    Implicit in the claim that the formulation enables derivation of general nonlinear constitutive relations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1412 out tokens · 35162 ms · 2026-05-10T14:01:31.237932+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bulletin of the New Zealand Soci- ety for Earthquake Engineering33(4), 421– 444 (2000) https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee

    Priestley, M.J.N., Kowalsky, M.J.: Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete 15 buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Soci- ety for Earthquake Engineering33(4), 421– 444 (2000) https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee. 33.4.421-444

  2. [2]

    & Tolley, M

    Rus, D., Tolley, M.T.: Design, fabrica- tion and control of soft robots. Nature 521(7553), 467–475 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature14543

  3. [3]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31(6), 1261–1280 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Burgner-Kahrs, J., Rucker, D.C., Choset, H.: Continuum robots for medical applications: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 31(6), 1261–1280 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1109/TRO.2015.2489500

  4. [4]

    Nature573(7773), 205–213 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1538-z

    Xia, X., Afshar, A., Yang, H., Portela, C.M., Kochmann, D.M., Di Leo, C.V., Greer, J.R.: Electrochemically reconfigurable architected materials. Nature573(7773), 205–213 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1538-z

  5. [5]

    AI Feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression.Science Advances, 6(16):eaay2631, 2020

    Janbaz, S., Narooei, K., Van Manen, T., Zadpoor, A.: Strain rate–dependent mechan- ical metamaterials. Science advances6(25), 0616 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. aba0616

  6. [6]

    Nature Commu- nications14(1), 2069 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-023-37707-2

    Karthikeyan, V., Surjadi, J.U., Li, X., Fan, R., Theja, V.C.S., Li, W.J., Lu, Y., Roy, V.A.L.: Three dimensional architected ther- moelectric devices with high toughness and power conversion efficiency. Nature Commu- nications14(1), 2069 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-023-37707-2

  7. [7]

    Addi- tive Manufacturing Letters4, 100111 https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100111

    Weeger, O., Valizadeh, I., Mistry, Y., Bhate, D.: Inelastic finite deformation beam mod- eling, simulation, and validation of addi- tively manufactured lattice structures. Addi- tive Manufacturing Letters4, 100111 https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100111

  8. [8]

    Applied Composite Materials 25(4), 797–810 (2018) https://doi.org/10

    Weeger, O., Sakhaei, A.H., Tan, Y.Y., Quek, Y.H., Lee, T.L., Yeung, S.-K., Kaijima, S., Dunn, M.L.: Nonlinear multi-scale mod- elling, simulation and validation of 3D knit- ted textiles. Applied Composite Materials 25(4), 797–810 (2018) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10443-018-9702-4

  9. [9]

    Materials & Design137, 256–265 https://doi.org/10

    Ding, Z., Weeger, O., Qi, H.J., Dunn, M.L.: 4D Rods: 3D Structures via Pro- grammable 1D Composite Rods. Materials & Design137, 256–265 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.matdes.2017.10.004

  10. [10]

    Applied Mathematical Sciences

    Antman, S.S.: Nonlinear Problems of Elastic- ity, 2nd edn. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 107. Springer, NY (2005). https://doi. org/10.1007/0-387-27649-1

  11. [11]

    Inter- national Journal of Solids and Structures 45(17), 4766–4781 (2008) https://doi.org/10

    Auricchio, F., Carotenuto, P., Reali, A.: On the geometrically exact beam model: A consistent, effective and simple derivation from three-dimensional finite-elasticity. Inter- national Journal of Solids and Structures 45(17), 4766–4781 (2008) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.015

  12. [12]

    PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2014)

    Eugster, S.R.: On the foundations of contin- uum mechanics and its application to beam theories. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2014). https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010255287

  13. [13]

    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 26(1), 163–243 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Meier, C., Popp, A., Wall, W.A.: Geo- metrically Exact Finite Element Formula- tions for Slender Beams: Kirchhoff–Love The- ory Versus Simo–Reissner Theory. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 26(1), 163–243 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11831-017-9232-5

  14. [14]

    Springer, Cham (2021)

    Mittelstedt, C.: Structural Mechanics in Lightweight Engineering. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-75193-7

  15. [15]

    Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 385, 113993 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2021.113993

    Choi, M.-J., Sauer, R.A., Klinkel, S.: An isogeometric finite element formulation for geometrically exact Timoshenko beams with extensible directors. Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 385, 113993 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2021.113993

  16. [16]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering450, 118641 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118641 16

    Ignesti, D., Ferri, G., Reali, A., Auricchio, F., Kiendl, J., Marino, E.: A novel finite-strain mixed isogeometric collocation formulation for hyperelastic geometrically exact beams. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering450, 118641 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118641 16

  17. [17]

    International Journal for Numerical Meth- ods in Engineering122(5), 1262–1282 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6566

    Smriti, Kumar, A., Steinmann, P.: A finite element formulation for a direct approach to elastoplasticity in special Cosserat rods. International Journal for Numerical Meth- ods in Engineering122(5), 1262–1282 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6566

  18. [18]

    Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids24(3), 686–700 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286517754132

    Smriti, Kumar, A., Großmann, A., Stein- mann, P.: A thermoelastoplastic theory for special Cosserat rods. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids24(3), 686–700 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286517754132

  19. [19]

    Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering399, 115456 (2022) https://doi

    Weeger, O., Schillinger, D., M¨ uller, R.: Mixed isogeometric collocation for geometri- cally exact 3D beams with elasto-visco-plastic material behavior and softening effects. Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering399, 115456 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115456

  20. [20]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering417, 116413 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116413

    Ferri, G., Ignesti, D., Marino, E.: An efficient displacement-based isogeometric formulation for geometrically exact viscoelastic beams. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering417, 116413 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116413

  21. [21]

    International Journal of Solids and Structures331, 113912 (2026) https://doi

    Parida, A., Gupta, P.: A variationally consis- tent chemo-elastic theory for special cosserat rods. International Journal of Solids and Structures331, 113912 (2026) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2026.113912

  22. [22]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing441, 117983 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Alzate Cobo, J.C., Peng, X.-L., Xu, B.-X., Weeger, O.: A finite swelling 3D beam model with axial and radial diffusion. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing441, 117983 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cma.2025.117983

  23. [23]

    Computational Mechanics 67(3), 723–742 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Herrnb¨ ock, L., Kumar, A., Steinmann, P.: Geometrically exact elastoplastic rods: deter- mination of yield surface in terms of stress resultants. Computational Mechanics 67(3), 723–742 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00466-020-01957-4

  24. [24]

    Compu- tational Mechanics71(1), 1–24 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02204-8

    Herrnb¨ ock, L., Kumar, A., Steinmann, P.: Two-scale off-and online approaches to geo- metrically exact elastoplastic rods. Compu- tational Mechanics71(1), 1–24 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02204-8

  25. [25]

    Computational Mechanics75(5), 1471–1482 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02572-3

    G¨ artner, T., Boom, S., Weerheijm, J., Sluys, L.: A strategy for scaling the harden- ing behavior in finite element modelling of geometrically exact beams. Computational Mechanics75(5), 1471–1482 (2025) https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02572-3

  26. [27]

    Journal of Elasticity124(1), 81–106 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-015-9562-1

    Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Gupta, P.: A Heli- cal Cauchy-Born Rule for Special Cosserat Rod Modeling of Nano and Continuum Rods. Journal of Elasticity124(1), 81–106 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-015-9562-1

  27. [28]

    Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 398, 115256 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2022.115256

    Singh, R., Arora, A., Kumar, A.: A computa- tional framework to obtain nonlinearly elas- tic constitutive relations of special Cosserat rods with surface energy. Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 398, 115256 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2022.115256

  28. [29]

    European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids98, 104867 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104867

    Vinayak, Smriti, Kumar, A.: Uniformly strained anisotropic elastoplastic rods: Deter- mination of elastoplastic constitutive rela- tions and yield surface in terms of rod’s variables. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids98, 104867 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104867

  29. [30]

    Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 418, 116553 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2023.116553

    Kumar, R., Agarwal, V., Kumar, A.: A com- putational approach to obtain nonlinearly elastic constitutive relations of strips modeled as a special Cosserat rod. Computer Meth- ods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 418, 116553 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cma.2023.116553

  30. [31]

    European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 116, 105943 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 17 j.euromechsol.2025.105943

    Kumar, R., Kumar, A.: Growth-modulated natural shape and stiffnesses of elastic rods modeled as a special Cosserat rod. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids 116, 105943 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 17 j.euromechsol.2025.105943

  31. [32]

    PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander- Universit¨ at Erlangen-N¨ urnberg (2023)

    Herrnb¨ ock, L.: Numerische Methoden zur Modellierung elastoplastischer Balken und ihre Anwendung auf periodische Gitter- strukturen. PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander- Universit¨ at Erlangen-N¨ urnberg (2023)

  32. [33]

    International Journal of Solids and Structures276, 112307 (2023) https://doi

    Le Cl´ ezio, H., Lestringant, C., Kochmann, D.M.: A numerical two-scale approach for nonlinear hyperelastic beams and beam net- works. International Journal of Solids and Structures276, 112307 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112307

  33. [34]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing435, 117592 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Schommartz, J.O., Klein, D.K., Alzate Cobo, J.C., Weeger, O.: Physics-augmented neural networks for constitutive modeling of hyper- elastic geometrically exact beams. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing435, 117592 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cma.2024.117592

  34. [35]

    Extreme Mechanics Letters73, 102260 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2024.102260

    Le Cl´ ezio, H., Karapiperis, K., Kochmann, D.M.: Nonlinear two-scale beam simulations accelerated by thermodynamics- informed neural networks. Extreme Mechanics Letters73, 102260 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2024.102260

  35. [36]

    Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Wriggers, P.: Nonlinear Finite Element Meth- ods, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71001-1

  36. [38]

    Wiley, Chichester Weinheim (2010)

    Holzapfel, G.A.: Nonlinear Solid Mechan- ics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering. Wiley, Chichester Weinheim (2010)

  37. [39]

    Piegl and W

    Piegl, L., Tiller, W.: The NURBS Book, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-59223-2

  38. [40]

    Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Appli- cations, vol

    Hinze, M., Pinnau, R., Ulbrich, M., Ulbrich, S.: Optimization with PDE Constraints. Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Appli- cations, vol. 23. Springer. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4020-8839-1

  39. [41]

    Schneider, B

    Eidel, B., Gruttmann, F.: Elastoplastic orthotropy at finite strains: multiplicative formulation and numerical implementation. Computational Materials Science28(3-4), 732–742 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. commatsci.2003.08.027

  40. [42]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing448, 118457 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Shafqat, A., Weeger, O., Xu, B.-X.: A robust finite strain isogeometric chemo- mechanics solid-beam element. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing448, 118457 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cma.2025.118457

  41. [43]

    Archive of Applied Mechanics 95(9), 219 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00419-025-02924-2 18

    Elbadry, Y.T., Antol´ ın, P., Weeger, O.: Immersed isogeometric analysis with bound- ary conformal quadrature for finite deforma- tion elasticity. Archive of Applied Mechanics 95(9), 219 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00419-025-02924-2 18