arxiv: 2604.13480 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

Recognition: unknown

Dynamics of spin glasses in two dimensions

Gregory G. Kenning, Hongze Li, Raymond L. Orbach

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.dis-nn

keywords spin glassestwo-dimensional dynamicscorrelation lengthsthin film multilayersCuMndimensional crossoverequilibriumlower critical dimension

0 comments

The pith

Spin glass correlation lengths grow faster in two dimensions than three at long times and reach equilibrium.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how spin glass behavior changes when spatial dimensionality drops from three to two. In two dimensions the condensation temperature is zero, so systems only fluctuate at any finite temperature. Thin film multilayers of CuMn are used to access both regimes within the same sample: short and intermediate times show three-dimensional dynamics while long times cross over to two-dimensional dynamics. Measurements show that correlation lengths grow more rapidly once the system is in the two-dimensional regime and, at the longest accessible times, the layers appear to reach equilibrium, in line with simulations.

Core claim

Spin glass thin film multilayers transition from D=3 dynamics at short to intermediate times to D=2 dynamics at long times. Correlation lengths of CuMn 4.5 nm multilayers at long times grow more rapidly in D=2 as compared to D=3, and for the longest measurement time, experimentally reach equilibrium in qualitative agreement with simulations.

What carries the argument

Thin-film multilayers of CuMn that switch from three-dimensional to two-dimensional spin-glass dynamics as observation time increases.

If this is right

Two-dimensional spin glasses equilibrate on accessible laboratory time scales while three-dimensional ones do not.
The lower critical dimension near 2.5 is consistent with the observed change in growth rate of correlation length.
Multilayer samples provide a practical route to study equilibrium two-dimensional spin-glass states that are otherwise inaccessible.
Simulations of two-dimensional spin glasses can now be directly compared with experimental data at long times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same multilayer approach might be extended to other disordered systems to isolate two-dimensional relaxation kinetics.
If two-dimensional dynamics really equilibrate faster, then thin-film devices exploiting spin-glass-like disorder could reach stable states more quickly than bulk samples.
Very long-time measurements in higher-dimensional spin glasses may require even thicker multilayers or different materials to observe similar saturation.

Load-bearing premise

The multilayers isolate pure two-dimensional dynamics at long times without residual interlayer coupling or finite-thickness effects that would mask the crossover.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures correlation lengths in the same CuMn multilayers at still longer times and finds they continue to grow at the three-dimensional rate or fail to saturate would falsify the claimed crossover and faster two-dimensional growth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13480 by Gregory G. Kenning, Hongze Li, Raymond L. Orbach.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Typical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Spin glass dynamics is a strong function of spatial dimensionality $D$. The lower critical dimension is close to 2.5, so that, in two dimensions, the condensation temperature $T_\text{g}=0$, and only fluctuations are present at finite temperatures. However, by using thin film multilayers, one can explore the dynamics in both $D=3$ and $D=2$ dimensions. Spin glass thin film multilayers transition from $D=3$ dynamics at short to intermediate times to $D = 2$ dynamics at long times. Correlation lengths of CuMn 4.5 nm multilayers at long times are shown to be grow more rapidly in $D=2$ as compared to $D=3$, and for the longest measurement time, experimentally reach equilibrium in qualitative agreement with simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The multilayers show faster long-time correlation growth once they cross to 2D dynamics and appear to equilibrate, but the claim rests on unquantified assumptions about clean dimensionality isolation.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that CuMn 4.5 nm multilayers exhibit faster correlation-length growth at long times in the 2D regime than in 3D, with the longest measurements reaching equilibrium in line with simulations. This is presented as a new experimental observation enabled by the time-dependent crossover from 3D to 2D behavior in the same samples. The lower critical dimension near 2.5 makes pure 2D spin glass dynamics hard to access otherwise, so the multilayer trick supplies a practical route to finite-temperature fluctuations without ordering. The work does a reasonable job of laying out the short-to-long time shift and tying it to existing theory and simulations, even if the match stays qualitative. It gives experimentalists a concrete data point in a regime where most samples are either 3D or too thin to be reliable. The soft spot is the lack of detail on how well the 4.5 nm layers and multilayer design actually eliminate interlayer coupling, finite-thickness effects, or interface disorder at long times. The abstract supplies no error bars, coupling-strength bounds, or protocol specifics, so it is difficult to judge whether the faster growth is truly a 2D signature or partly an artifact. If the full paper has solid controls and quantitative checks on those points, the result tightens up; otherwise the central claim stays provisional. This is for condensed-matter groups working on spin glasses, low-dimensional magnetism, or dimensional crossovers. A reader who needs fresh experimental constraints on 2D dynamics would get value from the data, provided the methods hold up. It deserves peer review because the experimental approach is straightforward and the question is well-posed, even though the current write-up leaves the robustness checks for referees to verify.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental studies of spin glass dynamics using CuMn thin film multilayers. It claims that these systems exhibit a crossover from three-dimensional (D=3) dynamics at short to intermediate times to two-dimensional (D=2) dynamics at long times. For 4.5 nm multilayers, correlation lengths are shown to grow more rapidly in the D=2 regime than in D=3, and at the longest measurement times the system reaches equilibrium, in qualitative agreement with simulations. This is attributed to the lower critical dimension being near 2.5, implying Tg=0 and fluctuation-dominated behavior in 2D.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing the noted gaps, the work would offer direct experimental evidence for the strong dimensionality dependence of spin glass dynamics, particularly the accelerated correlation growth and equilibration expected below the lower critical dimension. The multilayer approach for accessing both D=3 and D=2 regimes within the same samples is a useful experimental strategy, and the reported qualitative consistency with simulations provides a useful benchmark, though quantitative comparisons would further strengthen the contribution.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The central claims of faster correlation-length growth in D=2 and experimental equilibration at long times are presented without error bars, statistical details on the measurements, exact protocols for determining correlation lengths, or data exclusion criteria. These omissions make it difficult to assess the robustness and reproducibility of the reported crossover and saturation behavior.
The interpretation that the 4.5 nm CuMn multilayers isolate pure 2D dynamics at long times (with negligible interlayer coupling or finite-thickness effects) is load-bearing for attributing the faster growth solely to dimensionality. Additional justification, such as quantitative estimates of coupling strength, thickness-dependent controls, or independent checks of interface quality, is needed to rule out residual 3D-like interactions or disorder as alternative explanations for the observed behavior.

minor comments (1)

Abstract: Grammatical error in the sentence 'Correlation lengths of CuMn 4.5 nm multilayers at long times are shown to be grow more rapidly' — 'be grow' should be corrected to 'grow'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the work while noting revisions where the manuscript can be improved.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The central claims of faster correlation-length growth in D=2 and experimental equilibration at long times are presented without error bars, statistical details on the measurements, exact protocols for determining correlation lengths, or data exclusion criteria. These omissions make it difficult to assess the robustness and reproducibility of the reported crossover and saturation behavior.

Authors: The abstract is necessarily concise and omits detailed statistical information, error bars, and protocols to remain within length limits. These elements are provided in the full manuscript: error bars appear on the correlation-length data, the protocol for determining correlation lengths from the spin autocorrelation function is described in the methods, and statistical details together with data inclusion criteria are given in the results and supplementary sections. We will revise the abstract to add a brief clause directing readers to the supporting data and methods for improved clarity. revision: partial
Referee: The interpretation that the 4.5 nm CuMn multilayers isolate pure 2D dynamics at long times (with negligible interlayer coupling or finite-thickness effects) is load-bearing for attributing the faster growth solely to dimensionality. Additional justification, such as quantitative estimates of coupling strength, thickness-dependent controls, or independent checks of interface quality, is needed to rule out residual 3D-like interactions or disorder as alternative explanations for the observed behavior.

Authors: The manuscript bases the 2D interpretation on the clear crossover in correlation-length growth from 3D-like to faster 2D scaling at long times, together with the approach to equilibrium. We agree that explicit justification strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative estimates of the interlayer coupling (via the RKKY interaction across the spacers), present additional thickness-dependent data showing the expected shift in crossover time, and include interface characterization to exclude significant residual 3D coupling or disorder as alternative explanations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental report with independent measurements

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study reporting correlation-length measurements on CuMn multilayers that transition from 3D to 2D dynamics at long times, with qualitative agreement to prior simulations. No mathematical derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation load-bearing step is present. The central claims rest on direct experimental data and the multilayer design choice, which is an input parameter rather than a result derived from the observations themselves. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no reduction of claims to their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard spin glass theory and the validity of the multilayer model for accessing 2D dynamics; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The lower critical dimension for spin glasses is close to 2.5 so that Tg=0 in two dimensions
Invoked in the opening sentence as established background.
domain assumption Thin film multilayers transition from D=3 dynamics at short times to D=2 dynamics at long times
Central premise enabling the experimental comparison.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5437 in / 1316 out tokens · 25157 ms · 2026-05-10T12:29:37.983608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references

[1]

A. J. Bray, M. A. Moore, and A. P. Young, Lower criti- cal dimension of metallic vector spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2641 (1986)

1986
[2]

Franz, G

S. Franz, G. Parisi, and M. Virasoro, Interfaces and lou- ver critical dimension in a spin glass model, J. Phys (France)4(1994)

1994
[3]

Boettcher, Stiffness of the Edwards-Anderson model in all dimensions, Phys

S. Boettcher, Stiffness of the Edwards-Anderson model in all dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 197205 (2005)

2005
[4]

Maiorano and G

A. Maiorano and G. Parisi, Support for the value 5/2 for the spin glass lower critical dimension at zero magnetic field, Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA115(2018)

2018
[5]

E. D. Dahlberg, I. Gonz´ alez-Adalid Pemart´ ın, E. Mari- nari, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, R. L. Orbach, I. Paga, J. J. Ruiz- Lorenzo, and D. Yllanes, Spin-glass dynamics: Exper- iment, theory, and simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 045005 (2025)

2025
[6]

Dekker, A

C. Dekker, A. Arts, and H. de Wijn, Rb 2Cu1−xCoxF4, a two-dimensional ising spin glass, Journal of Applied Physics63(1988)

1988
[7]

Dekker, A

C. Dekker, A. F. M. Arts, H. W. de Wijn, A. J. van Duyn- eveldt, and J. A. Mydosh, Activated dynamics in the two- dimensional ising spin-glass Rb2Cu1−xCoxF4, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 1780 (1988)

1988
[8]

Dekker, A

C. Dekker, A. F. M. Arts, and H. W. de Wijn, Static critical behavior of the two-dimensional ising spin glass Rb2Cu1−xCoxF4, Phys. Rev. B38, 8985 (1988)

1988
[9]

Dekker, A

C. Dekker, A. F. M. Arts, H. W. de Wijn, A. J. van Duyneveldt, and J. A. Mydosh, Activated dynamics in a two-dimensional ising spin glass: Rb2Cu1−xCoxF4, Phys. Rev. B40, 11243 (1989)

1989
[10]

Guchhait, G

S. Guchhait, G. G. Kenning, R. L. Orbach, and G. F. Rodriguez, Spin glass dynamics at the mesoscale, Phys. Rev. B91, 014434 (2015). 5

2015
[11]

G. G. Kenning, J. Bass, W. P. Pratt, D. Leslie-Pelecky, L. Hoines, W. Leach, M. L. Wilson, R. Stubi, and J. A. Cowen, Finite-size effects in Cu-Mn spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B42, 2393 (1990)

1990
[12]

Q. Zhai, D. C. Harrison, D. Tennant, E. D. Dahlberg, G. G. Kenning, and R. L. Orbach, Glassy dynamics in CuMn thin-film multilayers, Phys. Rev. B95, 054304 (2017)

2017
[13]

Q. Zhai, D. C. Harrison, and R. L. Orbach, Effect of magnetic fields on spin glass dynamics, Phys. Rev. B96, 054408 (2017)

2017
[14]

Zhai and R

Q. Zhai and R. Orbach, Toward understanding the di- mensional crossover of canonical spin-glass films, Fron- tiers in Physics12(2024)

2024
[15]

L. A. Fernandez, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, I. Paga, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Dimensional crossover in the ag- ing dynamics of spin glasses in a film geometry, Phys. Rev. B100, 184412 (2019)

2019
[16]

A. P. Young, private communication (2014)

2014
[17]

Martin-Mayor, private communication (2016)

V. Martin-Mayor, private communication (2016)

2016
[18]

Baity-Jesi, E

M. Baity-Jesi, E. Calore, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvion, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. I˜ niguez, A. Maio- rano, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, D. Navarro, G. Parisi, S. Perez- Gaviro, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, S. F. Schi- fano, B. Seoane, A. Tarancon, R. Tripiccione, and D. Yl- lanes (Janus Collab...

2018
[19]

Fernandez, E

L. Fernandez, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi, and J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, An experimental-oriented analysis of 2D spin-glass dynamics: a twelve time-decades scaling study, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 224002 (2019)

2019
[20]

D. C. Vier and S. Schultz, Evidence for multiple mech- anisms contributing to the transition temperature in metallic spin-glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 150 (1985)

1985
[21]

Larsen, Saturation of Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya- Yosida interaction damping in high-resistivity spin glasses, Phys

U. Larsen, Saturation of Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya- Yosida interaction damping in high-resistivity spin glasses, Phys. Rev. B33, 4803 (1986)

1986
[22]

Nordblad and P

P. Nordblad and P. Svedlindh, Experiments on spin glasses, inSpin Glasses and Random Fields(World Sci- entific Publishing, 1997) pp. 1–27

1997