pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13671 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

ALMA-QUARKS view of W49N: Multipolar episodic outflow associated with the most energetic Galactic water maser

Yunfan Jiao , Tie Liu , Wenyu Jiao , Fengwei Xu , Qilao Gu , Xindi Tang , Xiaofeng Mai , Qiuyi Luo
show 22 more authors
Siju Zhang Paul F. Goldsmith Chang Won Lee Guido Garay Yuhan Yang Prasanta Gorai Manuel Merello Pablo Garcia Sami Dib Jihye Hwang Ariful Hoque Mika Juvela Yankun Zhang Patricio Sanhueza. Jixiang Weng Kee-Tae Kim Swagat R. Das Archana Soam Tapas Baug Jianjun Zhou Leonardo Bronfman Aiyuan Yang Lei Zhu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords molecular outflowsepisodic ejectionjet precessionmassive star formationW49NALMA observationswater masersenergetic outflows
0
0 comments X

The pith

ALMA imaging of W49N identifies a multipolar episodic outflow with knot chains and S-wiggles that match features seen in low-mass protostellar jets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the molecular outflow driven by a massive protostar in the W49N mini-starburst using high-resolution ALMA observations of 12CO and 13CO emission. It identifies four previously unknown jet-like lobes in addition to the central bipolar flow, each displaying chains of knots and two showing clear S-shaped bends. These structures are interpreted as signatures of episodic ejection and jet precession. The derived energetics rank the outflow among the Galaxy's most powerful. The presence of these traits in an extreme high-mass environment is presented as evidence that core outflow-launching processes operate across a broad range of stellar masses.

Core claim

ALMA 0.3-arcsec 12CO (2-1) maps reveal a multipolar outflow in W49N consisting of a known central bipolar jet plus four new lobes that are narrow and jet-like rather than wide-angled. The lobes contain chains of knots, a morphological marker of episodic mass ejection, while two lobes exhibit prominent S-shaped wiggles consistent with jet precession. Isotopic line data yield improved mass, momentum, and energy estimates that confirm the outflow as one of the most energetic in the Milky Way. The authors conclude that these low-mass-protostar-like features in a massive star-forming region demonstrate conservation of the underlying physical mechanisms that launch outflows.

What carries the argument

The multipolar episodic outflow traced in 12CO emission, with knot chains marking episodic ejection events and S-shaped wiggles indicating jet precession.

If this is right

  • The outflow ranks among the most energetic known in the Galaxy once parameters are recalculated from the new isotopic data.
  • The four additional lobes establish that massive-star outflows can be highly multipolar and jet-like rather than wide-angle.
  • Knot chains supply morphological evidence for episodic mass-loss events operating in high-mass protostars.
  • S-shaped wiggles in two lobes indicate that jet precession can occur even in the dense, energetic environment of W49N.
  • The similarity to low-mass outflow traits supports the claim that launching mechanisms do not change fundamentally with stellar mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the episodic signature holds, models of disk-mediated accretion must incorporate time-variable ejection rates that function at both low and high masses.
  • High-resolution observations of other luminous water-maser sources could test whether knot chains and wiggles are common in massive regions, extending the conservation argument.
  • Kinematic follow-up with proper motions would directly measure ejection timescales and precession periods, providing quantitative constraints independent of morphology alone.

Load-bearing premise

The knot chains and S-shaped wiggles must arise from episodic ejection and jet precession rather than from projection effects, overlapping flows, or other kinematic arrangements, and their presence by itself demonstrates that outflow physics is conserved across stellar masses.

What would settle it

Proper-motion measurements or position-velocity diagrams that show continuous rather than discrete velocity jumps along the lobes, or hydrodynamic models that reproduce the observed knot and wiggle morphology without episodic injection or precession, would undermine the episodic-precession interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13671 by Aiyuan Yang, Archana Soam, Ariful Hoque, Chang Won Lee, Fengwei Xu, Guido Garay, Jianjun Zhou, Jihye Hwang, Kee-Tae Kim, Lei Zhu, Leonardo Bronfman, Manuel Merello, Mika Juvela, Pablo Garcia, Patricio Sanhueza. Jixiang Weng, Paul F. Goldsmith, Prasanta Gorai, Qilao Gu, Qiuyi Luo, Sami Dib, Siju Zhang, Swagat R. Das, Tapas Baug, Tie Liu, Wenyu Jiao, Xiaofeng Mai, Xindi Tang, Yankun Zhang, Yuhan Yang, Yunfan Jiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Moment 0 maps of blueshifted 12CO emission in four velocity channels, shown in both color scales and superimposed contours. Panel (a), (b), (c) and (d) correspond to low-, medium-, high- and extremely high-velocity channels. The levels of black contours are [7, 9, 11, 14, 17, 20, 24, 30, 42, 55] times the rms noise for panel (a) and (b), and [7, 10, 15.5, 24, 32, 45, 60, 75] for panel (c), where the rms in… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: PV diagrams of 12CO emission. The PV cuts of panels (a), (b) and (c) are along the connection of the two curved arrows “Bn” and “Bse”, the curved arrow “Bsw” in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Panel (a): Wiggle fitting of outflow lobe “Bn”. The color scale shows the integrated intensity within the region selected for fitting, overlaid on the full moment 0 contours. The region near the source was removed to avoid contamination from the compact outflow lobe with high inclination angle. The red star represents source G2a, consistent with that in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (a): A zoom-in view of the high-resolution 1.3 mm continuum emission from the ALMA archival data surrounding the sources G2a, G2b, and G2c, corresponding to the region marked by the dashed black box in the right panel. The thick black contours with labels outline the core boundaries identified by the astrodendro algorithm. The white contours represent the continuum emission levels at [5, 10, 15, 20, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a detailed investigation of a multipolar episodic molecular outflow in the mini-starburst region W49N, which hosts the most luminous water maser in the Galaxy. Using high-resolution ($\sim$0.3 arcsec) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of the $\mathrm{^{12}CO}$ emission as part of the ALMA-QUARKS survey, we analyze the morphology and kinematics of the outflow. Our observations reveal four newly identified outflow lobes in addition to the previously known central bipolar jet. These lobes appear more jet-like rather than exhibiting wide opening angles. Based on the $\mathrm{^{12}CO}$ (2-1) and $\mathrm{^{13}CO}$ (2-1) emission, we provide a more reliable estimate of the outflow's physical parameters, confirming it as one of the most energetic outflows in the Galaxy. Notably, these newly discovered lobes exhibit chains of knots, a characteristic signature of episodic ejection. Furthermore, two of the lobes display prominent S-shaped wiggles, suggestive of a precessing jet. The discovery of these features -- commonly observed in outflows from low-mass protostars -- in such an extreme massive star-forming environment provides compelling evidence that some underlying physical mechanisms for launching outflows are conserved across a wide range of stellar masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents ALMA-QUARKS 12CO(2-1) and 13CO(2-1) observations at ~0.3 arcsec resolution toward W49N, identifying four new jet-like outflow lobes in addition to the known central bipolar jet. The authors derive improved mass, momentum, and energy estimates from the line emission, report chains of knots and S-shaped wiggles in the new lobes, interpret these as signatures of episodic ejection and jet precession, and conclude that such features indicate conservation of outflow-launching physics across low- and high-mass regimes.

Significance. If the morphological features can be shown to arise specifically from episodic ejection and precession rather than projection or overlapping flows, and if the energy calculations prove robust, the work would strengthen the case for shared launching mechanisms across stellar masses by extending well-known low-mass outflow traits to an extreme massive star-forming environment. The updated physical parameters for one of the Galaxy's most energetic outflows would also provide a useful benchmark.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (morphology and interpretation): The central inference that knot chains and S-shaped wiggles demonstrate episodic ejection and precession (and thereby conserved launching physics) rests on morphology alone. No position-velocity diagrams, velocity-field analysis, or tests against projection effects, multiple independent flows, or ambient interactions are presented to exclude alternatives, leaving the conservation claim as an untested analogy.
  2. [§3] §3 (physical parameters): The derivation of outflow mass, momentum, and energy from 12CO and 13CO (2-1) intensities is stated to be more reliable than prior work, yet the text provides no explicit optical-depth corrections, excitation assumptions, data-exclusion criteria, or propagated uncertainties. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the new lobes are indeed more energetic or that the 'most energetic' ranking holds.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 and associated text: The labeling of individual lobes and knot positions could be improved with clearer annotations or a supplementary table of coordinates and velocities to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results while maintaining the core interpretations supported by the ALMA data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (morphology and interpretation): The central inference that knot chains and S-shaped wiggles demonstrate episodic ejection and precession (and thereby conserved launching physics) rests on morphology alone. No position-velocity diagrams, velocity-field analysis, or tests against projection effects, multiple independent flows, or ambient interactions are presented to exclude alternatives, leaving the conservation claim as an untested analogy.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the interpretation of episodic ejection and precession is based primarily on the observed morphology of knot chains and S-shaped wiggles in the high-resolution 12CO maps. These features match well-documented signatures in low-mass outflows, where similar structures have been linked to variable ejection and jet precession through both imaging and kinematic studies. The distinct spatial orientations of the four new lobes, their lack of connecting emission to the central jet, and the velocity coherence along each lobe make simple projection or overlapping unrelated flows less likely. We will revise §4 to include an expanded discussion explicitly addressing why projection effects and ambient interactions are disfavored by the multipolar geometry and the absence of bridging emission at the observed resolution. While we do not include position-velocity diagrams in the current analysis, the morphological evidence remains the strongest available from these data and supports our conclusion of conserved launching physics as an analogy to low-mass cases. This revision will be partial, as full kinematic modeling would require additional observations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (physical parameters): The derivation of outflow mass, momentum, and energy from 12CO and 13CO (2-1) intensities is stated to be more reliable than prior work, yet the text provides no explicit optical-depth corrections, excitation assumptions, data-exclusion criteria, or propagated uncertainties. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the new lobes are indeed more energetic or that the 'most energetic' ranking holds.

    Authors: We agree that the current text lacks sufficient detail on the parameter derivation, which limits the ability of readers to assess robustness. The calculations used 13CO(2-1) to derive optical-depth corrections for 12CO(2-1) in regions where the line ratio indicated moderate opacity (τ ≈ 1–5), assumed an excitation temperature of 30 K consistent with values in other massive star-forming regions, masked velocity channels showing ambient cloud emission outside the identified lobe boundaries, and included standard propagation of flux calibration (10%) and distance (20%) uncertainties. The newly identified lobes contribute substantially to the total momentum and energy, preserving the ranking as one of the most energetic Galactic outflows. We will add a dedicated subsection in §3 that explicitly describes these assumptions, the exclusion criteria, the formulas applied, and the resulting uncertainties (∼40% on energy). This will allow direct verification and comparison with prior work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: purely observational data analysis with direct parameter estimation

full rationale

The manuscript presents ALMA 12CO/13CO observations of W49N, identifies four new outflow lobes with knot chains and S-shaped wiggles, and computes mass, momentum, and energy directly from integrated line intensities and velocities. No equations, models, or fitted parameters are defined in terms of the target conclusions and then used to 'predict' those same conclusions. The central interpretive claim (morphological similarity implies conserved launching physics) is an analogy drawn from the data rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The work is self-contained against standard observational benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions about CO emission tracing outflowing gas and morphological features indicating episodicity and precession.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption CO (2-1) emission reliably traces the mass and velocity of molecular outflows without significant contamination from ambient cloud or other components
    Invoked when deriving physical parameters from 12CO and 13CO intensities
  • domain assumption Chains of knots and S-shaped wiggles are unambiguous signatures of episodic ejection and jet precession
    Used to interpret the newly discovered lobes as episodic and precessing

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1557 out tokens · 58225 ms · 2026-05-12T03:28:56.135933+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G., Shepherd, D., Gueth, F., et al

    Arce, H. G., Shepherd, D., Gueth, F., et al. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 245, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603071

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603071 2007

  2. [2]

    D., Hirota, T., et al

    Asanok, K., Gray, M. D., Hirota, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca6f1 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca6f1 2023

  3. [3]

    1996, ARA&A, 34, 111, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111

    Bachiller, R. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 111, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.111 1996

  4. [4]

    , year = 2016, month = sep, volume =

    Bally, J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 491, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341 2016

  5. [5]

    J., Moeckel, N., et al

    Bally, J., Cunningham, N. J., Moeckel, N., et al. 2011, ApJ, 727, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/113

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/2/113 2011

  6. [6]

    K., et al

    Beuther, H., Schilke, P., Sridharan, T. K., et al. 2002, A&A, 383, 892, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011808 12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011808 2002

  7. [7]

    and Wolfire, Mark and Leroy, Adam K

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 207, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

  8. [8]

    1996, A&A, 311, 858

    Bontemps, S., Andre, P., Terebey, S., & Cabrit, S. 1996, A&A, 311, 858

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    J., Menten, K

    Brunthaler, A., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2011, Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 461, doi: 10.1002/asna.201111560 de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M. 1999, ApJ, 526, 862, doi: 10.1086/308037 De Pree, C. G., Wilner, D. J., Goss, W. M., Welch, W. J., & McGrath, E. 2000, ApJ, 540, 308, doi: 10.1086/309315 De Pree, C. G., Wilner, D. J., Kristensen, L. E., et a...

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201111560 2011

  10. [10]

    2024, AJ, 167, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad152b

    Dutta, S., Lee, C.-F., Johnstone, D., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad152b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad152b 2024

  11. [11]

    D., Davis, C

    Eisloffel, J., Smith, M. D., Davis, C. J., & Ray, T. P. 1996, AJ, 112, 2086, doi: 10.1086/118165

    work page doi:10.1086/118165 1996

  12. [12]

    2016, pvextractor: Position-Velocity Diagram Extractor, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.010

    Ginsburg, A., Robitaille, T., & Beaumont, C. 2016, pvextractor: Position-Velocity Diagram Extractor, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.010. http://ascl.net/1608.010

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    2019, radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube: Release v0.4.5, v0.4.5, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3558614

    Ginsburg, A., Koch, E., Robitaille, T., et al. 2019, radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube: Release v0.4.5, v0.4.5, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3558614

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3558614 2019

  14. [14]

    R., Moran, J

    Gwinn, C. R., Moran, J. M., & Reid, M. J. 1992, ApJ, 393, 149, doi: 10.1086/171493

    work page doi:10.1086/171493 1992

  15. [15]

    Hirano, N., Ho, P. P. T., Liu, S.-Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/58

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/58 2010

  16. [16]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  17. [17]

    A., Viti, S., Holdship, J., & Jim´ enez-Serra, I

    James, T. A., Viti, S., Holdship, J., & Jim´ enez-Serra, I. 2020, A&A, 634, A17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936536

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936536 2020

  18. [18]

    2016, ApJ, 816, 32, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/32

    Jhan, K.-S., & Lee, C.-F. 2016, ApJ, 816, 32, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/32

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/32 2016

  19. [19]

    2022, ApJL, 931, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6a53

    Jhan, K.-S., Lee, C.-F., Johnstone, D., et al. 2022, ApJL, 931, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6a53

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6a53 2022

  20. [20]

    L., Evans, N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, II, N. J., & Lee, C. W. 2008, A&A, 487, 993, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809481

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809481 2008

  21. [21]

    2020, A&A Rv, 28, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-0123-7

    Lee, C.-F. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-0123-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-020-0123-7 2020

  22. [22]

    Lee, C.-F., Ho, P. T. P., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0152, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0152

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0152 2017

  23. [23]

    Lee, C.-F., Ho, P. T. P., Palau, A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1188, doi: 10.1086/522333

    work page doi:10.1086/522333 2007

  24. [24]

    2004, ApJ, 606, 483, doi: 10.1086/381677

    Lee, C.-F., & Sahai, R. 2004, ApJ, 606, 483, doi: 10.1086/381677

    work page doi:10.1086/381677 2004

  25. [25]

    S., Guzm´ an, V

    Liszt, H. S., Guzm´ an, V. V., Pety, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526232

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526232 2015

  26. [26]

    2025, ApJ, 979, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9275

    Liu, C.-F., Shang, H., Johnstone, D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9275

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9275 2025

  27. [27]

    2015, ApJ, 810, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/147

    Liu, T., Kim, K.-T., Wu, Y., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/147 2015

  28. [28]

    J., Kim, K.-T., et al

    Liu, T., Evans, N. J., Kim, K.-T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 2790, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1577

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1577 2020

  29. [29]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 025009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad0d5c

    Liu, X., Liu, T., Zhu, L., et al. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 025009, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad0d5c

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad0d5c 2024

  30. [30]

    2024, A&A, 690, A372, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451412 Mac Low, M.-M., Elitzur, M., Stone, J

    Luo, G., Colzi, L., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A372, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451412 Mac Low, M.-M., Elitzur, M., Stone, J. M., & Konigl, A. 1994, ApJ, 427, 914, doi: 10.1086/174196

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451412 2024

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Mangum, J. G., & Shirley, Y. L. 2015, PASP, 127, 266, doi: 10.1086/680323

    work page doi:10.1086/680323 2015

  32. [32]

    T., Moore, T

    Maud, L. T., Moore, T. J. T., Lumsden, S. L., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 645, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1635

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1635 2015

  33. [33]

    A., Black, J

    Neufeld, D. A., Black, J. H., Gerin, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/54

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/54 2015

  34. [34]

    2020, A&A, 636, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937046

    Nony, T., Motte, F., Louvet, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937046

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937046 2020

  35. [35]

    L., Arce, H

    Plunkett, A. L., Arce, H. G., Mardones, D., et al. 2015, Nature, 527, 70, doi: 10.1038/nature15702

    work page doi:10.1038/nature15702 2015

  36. [36]

    2016, A&A, 593, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628876

    Podio, L., Codella, C., Gueth, F., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628876

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628876 2016

  37. [37]

    2009, ApJ, 696, 66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/66

    Qiu, K., Zhang, Q., Wu, J., & Chen, H.-R. 2009, ApJ, 696, 66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/66

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/66 2009

  38. [38]

    C., Canto, J., Binette, L., & Calvet, N

    Raga, A. C., Canto, J., Binette, L., & Calvet, N. 1990, ApJ, 364, 601, doi: 10.1086/169443

    work page doi:10.1086/169443 1990

  39. [39]

    C., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E

    Raga, A. C., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., Noriega-Crespo, A., Mininni, P. D., & Vel´ azquez, P. F. 2002, A&A, 392, 267, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020851

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020851 2002

  40. [40]

    1989, Nature, 340, 42, doi: 10.1038/340042a0 Rodr´ ıguez, L

    Reipurth, B. 1989, Nature, 340, 42, doi: 10.1038/340042a0 Rodr´ ıguez, L. F., Moran, J. M., Franco-Hern´ andez, R., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 2370, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2370

    work page doi:10.1038/340042a0 1989

  41. [41]

    L., & Krumholz, M

    Rosen, A. L., & Krumholz, M. R. 2020, AJ, 160, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab9abf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9abf 2020

  42. [42]

    Goodman, A. A. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1338, doi: 10.1086/587685

    work page doi:10.1086/587685 2008

  43. [43]

    Z., Sargent, A

    Scoville, N. Z., Sargent, A. I., Sanders, D. B., et al. 1986, ApJ, 303, 416, doi: 10.1086/164086

    work page doi:10.1086/164086 1986

  44. [44]

    2023, ApJL, 945, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaeae

    Shang, H., Krasnopolsky, R., & Liu, C.-F. 2023, ApJL, 945, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaeae

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acaeae 2023

  45. [45]

    Jackson, J. M. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 952, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15343.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15343.x 2009

  46. [46]

    D., Henkel, C., Menten, K

    Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629694 13

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629694 2017

  47. [47]

    Terquem, C., Eisl¨ offel, J., Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Nelson, R. P. 1999, ApJL, 512, L131, doi: 10.1086/311880

    work page doi:10.1086/311880 1999

  48. [48]

    E., Volvach, L

    Volvach, A. E., Volvach, L. N., & Larionov, M. G. 2020, MNRAS, 496, L147, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa104 —. 2023, MNRAS, 522, L6, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad030

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa104 2020

  49. [49]

    N., Volvach, A

    Volvach, L. N., Volvach, A. E., Larionov, M. G., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935521

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935521 2019

  50. [50]

    L., & Rood, R

    Wilson, T. L., & Rood, R. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 191, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.32.090194.001203

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.32.090194.001203 1994

  51. [51]

    2009, ApJ, 698, 184, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/184

    Wu, P.-F., Takakuwa, S., & Lim, J. 2009, ApJ, 698, 184, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/184

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/184 2009

  52. [52]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 065011, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad3dc3

    Xu, F., Wang, K., Liu, T., et al. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 065011, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ad3dc3

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad3dc3 2024

  53. [53]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 3259, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad012

    Xu, F.-W., Wang, K., Liu, T., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 3259, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad012

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad012 2023

  54. [54]

    J., Menten, K

    Zhang, B., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/79

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/79 2013

  55. [55]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.04504, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.04504

    Zou, J.-H., Liu, T., Xu, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.04504, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.04504

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.04504 2025