arxiv: 2604.13744 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

A Variable-Spot-Size and Multi-Frequency Square-Pulsed Source (SPS) Approach for Comprehensive Characterization of Anisotropic Thermal Transport Properties in Multilayered Thin Films

Kexin Zhang , Tao Chen , Jinlong Ma , Puqing Jiang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords thermal conductivitythin filmsanisotropic transportmultilayer structureslaser metrologyinterfacial conductanceheat capacity

0 comments

The pith

The square-pulsed source method extracts seven thermal parameters from multilayer thin films by varying laser spot size and frequency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a square-pulsed source technique that uses adjustable laser spot sizes together with modulation frequencies spanning 1 Hz to 10 MHz to determine multiple thermal properties at once in layered structures. Applied to a silicon-on-insulator sample with an aluminum transducer, the method separates in-plane and cross-plane conductivities of the silicon film, the oxide layer properties, substrate conductivity, and the aluminum-silicon interface conductance. Data collected from 80 K to 500 K match both literature values and first-principles calculations, showing the approach can isolate contributions from different layers and directions in the heat flow.

Core claim

The SPS method allows simultaneous extraction of anisotropic thermal conductivities, heat capacities, and interfacial thermal conductance in multilayered thin films by using tunable spot sizes and frequencies from 1 Hz to 10 MHz. Validation on a 1.59 μm Si / 1.03 μm SiO2 / Si substrate with 122 nm Al transducer shows agreement with literature and first-principles calculations from 80 to 500 K.

What carries the argument

The variable-spot-size and multi-frequency square-pulsed source (SPS) approach, which modulates the heat source size and frequency to gain sensitivity to different thermal transport directions and layers in the heat diffusion model.

If this is right

A single experimental run yields the full set of in-plane and cross-plane conductivities plus capacities for films and interfaces.
Temperature sweeps produce data consistent with theory, supporting direct use in device thermal modeling.
The method extends to other multilayer stacks where anisotropic heat flow limits performance.
It reduces reliance on separate techniques for each parameter by leveraging frequency and spot-size variation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This approach could streamline thermal metrology by replacing multiple dedicated instruments with one tunable setup.
It may reveal limits when applied to films thin enough for ballistic phonon transport, where the diffusion model breaks.
Extension to in-situ measurements during device operation would test real-world robustness.

Load-bearing premise

The heat diffusion model remains accurate and unique for all spot sizes and frequencies without significant non-Fourier effects or sample variations.

What would settle it

If the seven extracted parameters deviate from independent measurements or first-principles predictions across the 80-500 K range, the uniqueness of the SPS fitting would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13744 by Jinlong Ma, Kexin Zhang, Puqing Jiang, Tao Chen.

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Lower modulation frequencies increase thermal penetration depth, making the signals more sensitive to underlying layers. At 100 kHz, heat penetrates through the SiO2 layer, and the signals exhibit strong sensitivity to the following combined parameters: ㉑ 3+-()( *()( , ㉒3+-()( *')' , ㉓ +.( )(!% (, ㉛ 3+-/)/ */)/ , and ㉜ 3+-/)/ *()( , as shown in Figures 4(1e) and 4(1f). Since the device layer parameters hav… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: SPS signals and sensitivity analyses at lower kHz-range frequencies used to probe deeper layers, including the buried oxide layer and the Si substrate. (1a-1f) show results at 100 kHz, capturing the thermal response of the oxide layer. (2a-2f) show results at 10 kHz, increasing sensitivity to the Si substrate. The evolving sensitivity coefficients with decreasing modulation frequency illustrate how thermal… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Temperature dependence of the seven thermal parameters extracted from the SOI sample using the SPS method: (a) In-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivities of the Si film (𝑘!,EF LFI' and 𝑘",EF LFI' ), isotropic thermal conductivities of the SiO2 layer (𝑘EFK() and the Si substrate (𝑘EF,GHIJ); (b) Volumetric heat capacities of the Si (𝐶EF) and SiO2 (𝐶EFK() layers; and (c) Interfacial thermal conductance a… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Comparison of the in-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivities of the 1.6 μm-thick Si film obtained using the SPS method with literature data and theoretical predictions at two temperatures: (a) 300 K and (b) 100 K. Solid symbols represent the SPS measurements from this work; open symbols correspond to TDTR results reported by Jiang et al. [28, 29]. Curves represent first-principles predictions. The SPS… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Multilayered thin-film structures are frequently encountered in industrial applications, where accurate thermal property characterization is essential for performance optimization. These films, typically ranging from nanometers to micrometers in thickness, often exhibit anisotropic thermal conductivity and non-bulk heat capacity, which are challenging to measure. In this study, we introduce a variable-spot-size and multi-frequency square-pulsed source (SPS) method for the simultaneous determination of anisotropic thermal conductivities, heat capacities, and interfacial thermal conductance in multilayered systems. By leveraging a broad modulation frequency range (1 Hz to 10 MHz) and tunable laser spot sizes, the SPS method enhances sensitivity to different thermal parameters across layers. We validate this approach on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) sample comprising a 1.59 um Si layer, 1.03 um SiO2 layer, and a silicon substrate with a 122 nm aluminum (Al) transducer. The SPS method successfully extracts seven key thermal parameters, including the in-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivities and heat capacity of the Si film, the thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the SiO2 layer, the thermal conductivity of the substrate, and the interfacial thermal conductance between Al and Si. Temperature-dependent measurements from 80 to 500 K showed excellent agreement with literature values and first-principles predictions, confirming the method's accuracy and reliability. These results demonstrate the SPS method as a powerful tool for comprehensive thermal characterization of complex multilayered structures, with implications for both fundamental research and practical applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The SPS method combines tunable spot sizes with 1 Hz–10 MHz square-pulse excitation to extract seven thermal parameters at once from multilayer films, and the SOI validation against literature and first-principles values is the strongest part.

read the letter

The paper's real contribution is showing that one experimental setup—variable laser spot size plus broad-band square-wave heating—can supply enough independent signals to fit in-plane and cross-plane conductivities, volumetric heat capacities for both the Si film and SiO2 layer, substrate conductivity, and the Al-Si interface conductance from the same data set. That is a practical step beyond the usual need for separate measurements or strong priors on several of those quantities. The temperature-dependent results from 80 K to 500 K line up with external benchmarks, which gives the extraction more credibility than a purely internal consistency check would have provided. The approach is clearly aimed at industrial thin-film stacks where anisotropy and interfaces matter for device performance. The main gaps are the missing details on the heat-diffusion model itself, how the fitting is performed, and any sensitivity or uncertainty analysis. Without those, it is hard to judge how unique the seven-parameter solution really is when spot size and frequency are varied, or whether non-Fourier effects start to matter at the smallest spots or highest frequencies. The abstract also does not show raw phase or amplitude data, so a reader cannot yet assess the quality of the fits directly. This work is for experimentalists who characterize thermal transport in microelectronics or layered materials and who already use frequency-domain or spot-size methods. It is worth sending to peer review because the experimental integration is new and the external validation is honest; the model and error-propagation sections will need to be expanded in revision, but the core claim is testable and the authors have done the right kind of cross-check.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a variable-spot-size and multi-frequency square-pulsed source (SPS) method to simultaneously extract anisotropic thermal conductivities, volumetric heat capacities, and interfacial thermal conductance in multilayer thin films. The approach combines tunable laser spot sizes with a broad modulation frequency range (1 Hz to 10 MHz) and is validated on an SOI stack (1.59 μm Si film / 1.03 μm SiO2 / Si substrate) with a 122 nm Al transducer. Seven parameters are reported as extracted: in-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the Si layer, thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the SiO2 layer, substrate thermal conductivity, and Al-Si interfacial conductance. Temperature-dependent results (80–500 K) are stated to agree with literature values and first-principles calculations.

Significance. If the underlying model and inversion are shown to be robust, the SPS technique would offer a useful extension of frequency-domain and spot-size-variation methods for decoupling multiple anisotropic properties in a single experiment. The external consistency check against independent literature and ab initio data is a positive feature, and the parameter count (seven) is ambitious yet plausible given the experimental degrees of freedom. The work could be of interest for applied thermal metrology in microelectronics and energy devices, provided the fitting details and uniqueness are established.

major comments (2)

[Modeling section (likely §2–3)] The multilayer heat-diffusion model, its analytical or numerical implementation, boundary conditions, and incorporation of the square-pulsed source are not presented. This is load-bearing because the central claim—that seven independent parameters can be uniquely determined across the full range of spot sizes and frequencies—rests on the model remaining accurate and invertible without significant non-Fourier contributions or parameter trade-offs.
[Results and validation (likely §4)] No description is given of the fitting procedure, objective function, optimization method, uncertainty quantification, or sensitivity analysis. Without these, the reported agreement with literature values cannot be evaluated for robustness, and it is unclear whether the extracted values (e.g., in-plane vs. cross-plane Si conductivity, SiO2 heat capacity) are independently constrained or exhibit strong covariances.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the governing heat equation or key assumptions (Fourier vs. ballistic transport) to orient readers before the experimental details.
[Figures and captions] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly indicate which parameters are held fixed versus floated in each fit, and whether the reported uncertainties are 1σ or 95% confidence intervals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. The comments highlight important areas where additional clarity is needed to support the central claims of the SPS method. We have revised the manuscript substantially to address both major points by adding the missing technical details on the model and the fitting procedure. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Modeling section (likely §2–3)] The multilayer heat-diffusion model, its analytical or numerical implementation, boundary conditions, and incorporation of the square-pulsed source are not presented. This is load-bearing because the central claim—that seven independent parameters can be uniquely determined across the full range of spot sizes and frequencies—rests on the model remaining accurate and invertible without significant non-Fourier contributions or parameter trade-offs.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not provide a sufficiently detailed description of the heat-diffusion model. In the revised version we have added a complete Section 2 that presents the analytical multilayer solution in the frequency domain, the Hankel-transform treatment of finite spot size, the superposition used to synthesize the square-pulse excitation, and the boundary conditions enforcing continuity of temperature and heat flux at each interface (including the Al–Si contact). We also include a short analysis confirming that the Fourier approximation remains valid over the experimental range of spot sizes (10–100 µm) and frequencies (1 Hz–10 MHz) for the Si and SiO2 layers, with non-Fourier corrections estimated to be below the experimental noise floor. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and validation (likely §4)] No description is given of the fitting procedure, objective function, optimization method, uncertainty quantification, or sensitivity analysis. Without these, the reported agreement with literature values cannot be evaluated for robustness, and it is unclear whether the extracted values (e.g., in-plane vs. cross-plane Si conductivity, SiO2 heat capacity) are independently constrained or exhibit strong covariances.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of these details in the original submission. The revised manuscript now contains a dedicated subsection (4.2) that specifies the objective function (weighted sum of squared residuals on both amplitude and phase across all spot sizes and frequencies), the optimization algorithm (global differential-evolution search followed by Levenberg–Marquardt refinement), and uncertainty estimation via the covariance matrix obtained from the Hessian at the converged minimum. We have added a sensitivity analysis, including the Jacobian matrix and parameter correlation coefficients, demonstrating that the combination of variable spot size and broad frequency range provides largely independent constraints on the seven parameters with modest covariances. These additions allow direct evaluation of the robustness of the extracted values and their agreement with literature and first-principles data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper fits a standard multilayer heat-diffusion model to experimental data collected over tunable spot sizes and a wide frequency range (1 Hz–10 MHz). The seven extracted parameters (anisotropic conductivities, heat capacities, substrate conductivity, and interface conductance) are then validated against independent literature values and first-principles calculations rather than being re-derived from the same fit. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the described method or results. The central claim rests on the model's differential sensitivity across experimental regimes, which is externally falsifiable and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a multilayer heat-diffusion model whose parameters are fitted to the measured temperature response; the seven extracted values are the fitted outputs rather than independently derived quantities.

free parameters (7)

in-plane Si conductivity
Fitted parameter extracted from the SPS data for the 1.59 um Si layer.
cross-plane Si conductivity
Fitted parameter extracted from the SPS data for the 1.59 um Si layer.
Si heat capacity
Fitted parameter for the Si film.
SiO2 conductivity
Fitted parameter for the 1.03 um SiO2 layer.
SiO2 heat capacity
Fitted parameter for the SiO2 layer.
substrate conductivity
Fitted parameter for the silicon substrate.
Al-Si interfacial conductance
Fitted parameter at the transducer-film interface.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Fourier's law governs heat transport in all layers across the measured frequency and length scales.
Implicit in the multilayer heat-diffusion model used to interpret the SPS signals.
domain assumption Layer thicknesses and transducer properties are known exactly from independent metrology.
Required for unique fitting of the seven thermal parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5603 in / 1528 out tokens · 41410 ms · 2026-05-10T11:57:27.746084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

3 extracted references

[1]

,!−𝑆+$,! for 𝑛=1,2,…,𝑁 (2) >?𝑆,!+𝑆*!@-./ 01/ =−2>𝑆+

Introduction Thin-film structures, particularly those in the nanometer to micrometer range, play a critical role in modern industrial applications, ranging from microelectronics [1, 2] and optoelectronics [3] to thermal management in advanced devices [4]. These films often exhibit complex thermal behavior, such as anisotropic thermal conductivity [5] and ...

2025
[2]

J. Yang, C. Maragliano, A.J. Schmidt, Thermal property microscopy with frequency domain thermoreflectance, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 84 (2013) 104904. [10] T. Chen, S. Song, Y. Shen, K. Zhang, P. Jiang, Simultaneous measurement of thermal conductivity and heat capacity across diverse materials using the square-pulsed source (SPS) technique, International Commun...

2013
[3]

Jiang, B

P. Jiang, B. Huang, Y.K. Koh, Accurate measurements of cross-plane thermal conductivity of thin films by dual-frequency time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR), Rev. Sci. Instrum., 87 (2016) 075101. [31] Z. Han, X. Yang, W. Li, T. Feng, X. Ruan, FourPhonon: An extension module to ShengBTE for computing four-phonon scattering rates and thermal conductivity, C...

2016