arxiv: 2604.14009 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Recognition: unknown

The impact of two-dimensional filtering on white noise spectra in SWOT along-track observations

Ryan Sh\`iji\'e D\`u , Momme Hell , Luc Lenain , Fabrice Ardhuin , A. B. Villas B\^oas

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

keywords SWOTsea surface heightalong-track spectrawhite noisetwo-dimensional filteringpower-law spectraocean variabilitymeasurement noise

0 comments

The pith

Two-dimensional filtering of white noise produces red power-law spectra in SWOT along-track observations

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the red, power-law spectra seen in SWOT along-track sea surface height data at small scales can arise purely from processing effects on measurement noise. Synthetic experiments show that applying two-dimensional filtering and aliasing to spatially white noise generates one-dimensional along-track spectra that are red and match observed slopes around or steeper than -1. The resulting slope varies with noise level, how the noise changes across tracks, and the strength of the background ocean signal. This positions the processed noise as a baseline explanation that must be ruled out before attributing small-scale features to ocean dynamics.

Core claim

The central claim is that spatially uncorrelated white noise, once passed through the two-dimensional filtering and aliasing steps of the SWOT processing pipeline, yields one-dimensional along-track spectra exhibiting red, power-law-like behavior at small scales. These synthetic spectra are consistent with real observations, and their apparent slope depends on the noise level, its cross-track variability, and the background ocean signal.

What carries the argument

Two-dimensional filtering and aliasing applied to spatially uncorrelated (white) noise, which converts flat 2D spectra into sloped 1D along-track spectra.

If this is right

Observed correlations between spectral slopes and noise levels in SWOT data can result from filtering rather than ocean processes.
Small-scale spectral analyses should adopt this processed-noise model as the null hypothesis before claiming dynamical signals.
Spectral slopes will differ across ocean regions depending on local noise variability and background signal strength.
Accounting for these processing effects is required to separate measurement artifacts from true ocean variability at scales near 10 km.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Re-evaluation of submesoscale features reported in early SWOT studies may be needed if noise dominates the red spectra.
The same filtering mechanism could distort spectra in other 2D altimetry or remote-sensing datasets and merits parallel checks.
Varying the synthetic filter parameters could predict how slope changes with mission-specific processing choices.

Load-bearing premise

The measurement noise is spatially uncorrelated in two dimensions and the SWOT processing pipeline applies exactly the two-dimensional filtering and aliasing steps modeled in the synthetics.

What would settle it

Along-track spectra from SWOT that stay flat at small scales in low-ocean-signal regions with known high white noise levels would contradict the synthetic predictions.

read the original abstract

The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission provides two-dimensional observations of sea surface height (SSH) at unprecedented spatial resolution, enabling exploration of ocean variability down to scales of $O(10~\mathrm{ km})$. At these scales, however, interpreting SSH variability is challenging because ocean dynamical signals overlap with measurement noise, and their respective spectral signatures are not yet fully understood. Recent analyses of SWOT 2-km posting observations have shown that along-track spectra are red, with a power-law-like behavior at small scales and spectral slopes around or steeper than $-1$, with their magnitudes and slopes correlated with SWOT measurement noise. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that the red along-track spectra can arise from two-dimensional filtering and aliasing of spatially uncorrelated (white) noise. Using synthetic experiments, we show that the resulting one-dimensional along-track spectra exhibit red, power-law-like behavior at small scales, consistent with observations. The apparent spectral slope depends on the noise level, its cross-track variability, and the background ocean signal. This finding highlights the importance of carefully accounting for measurement noise and processing effects when interpreting SWOT spectra, and suggests that such a noise model should serve as a baseline null hypothesis for small-scale spectral analyses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows that 2D filtering of white noise produces red along-track spectra matching SWOT observations, giving a useful null model, though the exact match to the real pipeline is the part that needs checking.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that applying standard two-dimensional filtering and aliasing to spatially uncorrelated noise fields generates one-dimensional along-track spectra with red power-law slopes at small scales, just like the ones seen in SWOT 2-km data. The slopes vary with noise amplitude, cross-track variability, and background signal, which lines up with the correlations reported in the observations. This is a focused demonstration rather than a broad new theory, but it is a clean forward test that avoids fitting to the real spectra themselves. The synthetic setup is the right way to check the hypothesis, and it correctly flags that noise processing alone can mimic what might otherwise be read as ocean variability at 10 km scales. That reminder is practical for anyone working on energy budgets or small-scale SSH interpretation. The soft spot is the assumption that the modeled filter and noise statistics are close enough to the actual SWOT pipeline. If onboard processing or beam geometry introduces even mild spatial correlations, the emergent slopes will shift for the same input parameters. The abstract gives no quantitative match metrics or error bars on the slopes, so the strength of the agreement is not fully clear from the summary. This paper is for the SWOT analysis and ocean altimetry crowd. A reader who needs a baseline null model for spectral work at these scales will find it directly useful. It deserves peer review because the synthetic test is straightforward and the implication for data interpretation is immediate.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that red, power-law-like along-track spectra observed in SWOT sea surface height data at small scales (slopes around or steeper than -1) can arise from two-dimensional filtering and aliasing of spatially uncorrelated (white) noise. Synthetic experiments on independent white-noise fields are used to demonstrate that the resulting 1D along-track spectra exhibit red behavior at small scales, with the apparent slope depending on noise amplitude, cross-track variability, and background ocean signal; this is proposed as a baseline null hypothesis for small-scale SWOT spectral analyses.

Significance. If the synthetic model faithfully reproduces the SWOT noise statistics and processing pipeline, the work would provide a valuable null hypothesis for interpreting small-scale altimetry spectra, helping separate processing artifacts from dynamical ocean signals. The forward-simulation approach on independent synthetic fields is a strength, as it avoids circular parameter fitting to the observations themselves.

major comments (3)

[Methods] Methods (synthetic experiments section): The exact implementation of the two-dimensional filtering, aliasing, and any cross-track operations is not specified in sufficient detail (e.g., no explicit transfer function, cutoff wavenumbers, or aliasing procedure), preventing verification that the model matches the operational SWOT pipeline.
[Results] Results: No quantitative match metrics (e.g., fitted slopes with uncertainties, R² values, or Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances) or error bars are reported when comparing synthetic along-track spectra to observed SWOT spectra, so the claim of consistency remains qualitative and difficult to assess.
[Results] Results (sensitivity analysis): The reported dependence of spectral slope on noise level, cross-track variability, and background signal is central to the interpretation, but without details on the range of parameters tested or robustness checks, it is unclear whether the red spectra emerge generically or only for specific modeling choices.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The statement that slopes are 'around or steeper than -1' would benefit from reporting the specific range of slopes obtained in the synthetic experiments for direct comparison.
[Figures] Figure captions: Ensure all panels include axis labels with units and indicate which curves correspond to different noise levels or background signals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review, which has identified important areas for improving the clarity, reproducibility, and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made substantial revisions to incorporate the suggested enhancements.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] Methods (synthetic experiments section): The exact implementation of the two-dimensional filtering, aliasing, and any cross-track operations is not specified in sufficient detail (e.g., no explicit transfer function, cutoff wavenumbers, or aliasing procedure), preventing verification that the model matches the operational SWOT pipeline.

Authors: We agree that the original methods description was insufficiently detailed for full reproducibility and direct comparison to the SWOT processing chain. In the revised manuscript, we have substantially expanded the synthetic experiments section with explicit mathematical descriptions of the two-dimensional filtering (including the precise form of the transfer function and its implementation), the cutoff wavenumbers employed, the aliasing procedure used to generate along-track observations, and all cross-track operations. We have also added pseudocode and a new table summarizing the processing steps, drawing on publicly documented aspects of the SWOT pipeline to facilitate verification. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results: No quantitative match metrics (e.g., fitted slopes with uncertainties, R² values, or Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances) or error bars are reported when comparing synthetic along-track spectra to observed SWOT spectra, so the claim of consistency remains qualitative and difficult to assess.

Authors: We acknowledge that the spectral comparisons were presented qualitatively without supporting statistics. The revised results section now includes quantitative metrics: least-squares fitted slopes with 95% confidence intervals for both synthetic and observed spectra in the small-scale regime, R² values for the power-law fits, and ensemble-derived error bars on the synthetic spectra. We have also added Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances between the synthetic and observed spectral distributions to provide a statistical measure of consistency. These additions allow a more objective evaluation of the agreement. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results (sensitivity analysis): The reported dependence of spectral slope on noise level, cross-track variability, and background signal is central to the interpretation, but without details on the range of parameters tested or robustness checks, it is unclear whether the red spectra emerge generically or only for specific modeling choices.

Authors: We agree that the sensitivity analysis required more explicit documentation to establish generality. The revised manuscript now specifies the full ranges of parameters explored (noise amplitudes, cross-track variability levels, and background signal strengths), presents these in a dedicated table and supplementary figures, and includes additional robustness tests such as varying filter parameters within realistic bounds and repeating experiments across multiple noise realizations. These checks confirm that the red spectral behavior arises generically across the tested parameter space rather than for isolated choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward synthetic modeling independent of observed spectra

full rationale

The paper's central claim is demonstrated via forward simulation: synthetic 2D white-noise fields (spatially uncorrelated by construction) are passed through a modeled SWOT 2D filtering/aliasing pipeline, after which the resulting 1D along-track spectra are computed and shown to exhibit red power-law behavior. This is not a fit of parameters to real SWOT spectra followed by a 'prediction'; the inputs (white noise statistics, filter transfer function) are stated independently of the target observations. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the modeling assumption that SWOT noise is spatially white before filtering and that the mission's 2D processing steps are accurately represented in the synthetics; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

noise amplitude
Varied across experiments to explore dependence of spectral slope on noise level.
cross-track noise variability
Included as a parameter that modulates the resulting along-track spectrum.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Measurement noise is spatially uncorrelated white noise in two dimensions prior to processing.
Stated as the starting point for the synthetic experiments.
domain assumption SWOT along-track spectra are obtained after the mission's standard two-dimensional filtering and aliasing operations.
The synthetics replicate these operations to produce the observed red spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5542 in / 1351 out tokens · 24991 ms · 2026-05-10T11:50:15.906408+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[1]

Archer, M., J. Wang, P. Klein, G. Dibarboure, and L.-L. Fu, 2025: Wide-swath satellite altimetry unveils global submesoscale ocean dynamics. Nature, 640 (8059), 691--696, doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08722-8 2025
[2]

Molero, A

Ardhuin, F., B. Molero, A. Boh \'e , F. Nouguier, F. Collard, I. Houghton, A. Hay, and B. Legresy, 2024: Phase- Resolved Swells Across Ocean Basins in SWOT Altimetry Data : Revealing Centimeter-Scale Wave Heights Including Coastal Reflection . Geophysical Research Letters, 51 (16), e2024GL109\,658, doi:10.1029/2024GL109658

work page doi:10.1029/2024gl109658 2024
[3]

Le Sommer, V

Bertrand, V., J. Le Sommer, V. Vianna Zaia De Almeida, A. Samson, and E. Cosme, 2026: A robust minimization-based framework for cyclogeostrophic ocean surface current retrieval. Ocean Science, 22 (1), 241--255, doi:10.5194/os-22-241-2026

work page doi:10.5194/os-22-241-2026 2026
[4]

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61, 1--29, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2023.3290850

Boh \'e , A., 2023: A complete theoretical derivation of the level of random height noise in interferometric unfocused SAR swath altimetry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61, 1--29, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2023.3290850

work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3290850 2023
[5]

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1--1, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3551605

Boh \'e , A., and Coauthors, 2025: Measuring Significant Wave Height fields in two dimensions at kilometric scales with SWOT . IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1--1, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2025.3551605

work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3551605 2025
[6]

Callies, and R

B \"u hler, O., J. Callies, and R. Ferrari, 2014: Wave--vortex decomposition of one-dimensional ship-track data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 756, 1007--1026, doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.488

work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.488 2014
[7]

G., 1971: Geostrophic Turbulence

Charney, J. G., 1971: Geostrophic Turbulence . Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 28 (6), 1087--1095, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<1087:GT>2.0.CO;2

work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028 1971
[8]

B., 2024: A Postlaunch Update on the Effects of Instrumental Measurement Errors on SWOT Estimates of Sea Surface Height , Velocity , and Vorticity

Chelton, D. B., 2024: A Postlaunch Update on the Effects of Instrumental Measurement Errors on SWOT Estimates of Sea Surface Height , Velocity , and Vorticity . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 41 (9), 865--888, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-24-0035.1

work page doi:10.1175/jtech-d-24-0035.1 2024
[9]

Chelton, D. B., R. M. Samelson, and J. T. Farrar, 2022: The Effects of Uncorrelated Measurement Noise on SWOT Estimates of Sea Surface Height , Velocity , and Vorticity . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 39 (7), 1053--1083, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0167.1

work page doi:10.1175/jtech-d-21-0167.1 2022
[10]

Chelton, D. B., M. G. Schlax, R. M. Samelson, J. T. Farrar, M. J. Molemaker, J. C. McWilliams, and J. Gula, 2019: Prospects for future satellite estimation of small-scale variability of ocean surface velocity and vorticity. Progress in Oceanography, 173, 256--350, doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2018.10.012

work page doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2018.10.012 2019
[11]

Ardhuin, A

De Carlo, M., F. Ardhuin, A. Ollivier, and A. Nigou, 2023: Wave Groups and Small Scale Variability of Wave Heights Observed by Altimeters . Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 128 (8), e2023JC019\,740, doi:10.1029/2023JC019740

work page doi:10.1029/2023jc019740 2023
[12]

D \`u , R. S., K. S. Smith, and O. B \"u hler, 2025: Next- Order Balanced Model Captures Submesoscale Physics and Statistics . Journal of Physical Oceanography, 55 (10), 1679--1697, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-24-0146.1

work page doi:10.1175/jpo-d-24-0146.1 2025
[13]

BARREIRO-VILLAVERDE, DAVID, GOSSET, ANNE, LEMA, MARCOS& MENDEZ, MIGUELA 2023 Damping of three-dimensional waves on coating films dragged by moving substrates.Physics of Fluids35(7)

Dutykh, D., 2016: arXiv:1606.05432. A brief introduction to pseudo-spectral methods: Application to diffusion problems. arXiv, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.05432

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05432 2016
[14]

Munk, 1972: Space- Time scales of internal waves

Garrett, C., and W. Munk, 1972: Space- Time scales of internal waves. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 3 (3), 225--264, doi:10.1080/03091927208236082

work page doi:10.1080/03091927208236082 1972
[15]

Held, I. M., R. T. Pierrehumbert, S. T. Garner, and K. L. Swanson, 1995: Surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 282, 1--20, doi:10.1017/S0022112095000012

work page doi:10.1017/s0022112095000012 1995
[16]

Wang, 2026: A post-launch assessment of the noise level of the 2 Ka-band Radar Interferometer from SWOT

Huang, M., and J. Wang, 2026: A post-launch assessment of the noise level of the 2 Ka-band Radar Interferometer from SWOT . submitted

2026
[17]

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 130 (11), e2025JC022\,639, doi:10.1029/2025JC022639

Kachelein, L., and Coauthors, 2025: Sub-100 km Ocean Processes Revealed by Structure Functions of SWOT Sea Surface Height and In Situ Observing Network . Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 130 (11), e2025JC022\,639, doi:10.1029/2025JC022639

work page doi:10.1029/2025jc022639 2025
[18]

C., 2016: Submesoscale currents in the ocean

McWilliams, J. C., 2016: Submesoscale currents in the ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472 (2189), 20160\,117, doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0117

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0117 2016
[19]

Peral, E., 2021: KaRIn : Ka-band Radar Interferometer On-Board Processor ( OBP ) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document ( ATBD ). Tech. Rep. D-79130, Revision B, JPL

2021
[20]

Rodr \'i guez, and D

Peral, E., E. Rodr \'i guez, and D. Esteban-Fern \'a ndez , 2015: Impact of Surface Waves on SWOT 's Projected Ocean Accuracy . Remote Sensing, 7 (11), 14\,509--14\,529, doi:10.3390/rs71114509

work page doi:10.3390/rs71114509 2015
[21]

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, 1--27, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3405343

Peral, E., and Coauthors, 2024: KaRIn , the Ka-Band Radar Interferometer of the SWOT Mission : Design and in- Flight Performance . IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, 1--27, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2024.3405343

work page doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3405343 2024
[22]

M., and J

Samelson, R. M., and J. T. Farrar, 2024: Models of the Sea Surface Height Expression of the Internal-Wave Continuum . Journal of Physical Oceanography, 54 (10), 2099--2117, doi:10.1175/JPO-D-23-0178.1

work page doi:10.1175/jpo-d-23-0178.1 2024
[23]

, biburl =

Stein, M. L., 1999: Interpolation of Spatial Data. Springer Series in Statistics , Springer, New York, NY, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6

work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6 1999
[24]

Carli, M

Tr \'e boutte, A., E. Carli, M. Ballarotta, B. Carpentier, Y. Faug \`e re, and G. Dibarboure, 2023: KaRIn noise reduction using a convolutional neural network for the SWOT ocean products. Remote Sensing, 15 (8), 2183, doi:10.3390/rs15082183

work page doi:10.3390/rs15082183 2023
[25]

Villas B \^o as, A. B., L. Lenain, B. D. Cornuelle, S. T. Gille, and M. R. Mazloff, 2022: A Broadband View of the Sea Surface Height Wavenumber Spectrum . Geophysical Research Letters, 49 (4), e2021GL096\,699, doi:10.1029/2021GL096699

work page doi:10.1029/2021gl096699 2022
[26]

Villas B \^o as, A. B., G. Marechal, and A. Boh \'e , 2025: Observing Interactions Between Waves , Winds , and Currents From SWOT . Geophysical Research Letters, 52 (17), e2024GL114\,331, doi:10.1029/2024GL114331

work page doi:10.1029/2024gl114331 2025
[27]

Wang, J., L.-L. Fu, H. S. Torres, S. Chen, B. Qiu, and D. Menemenlis, 2019: On the Spatial Scales to be Resolved by the Surface Water and Ocean Topography Ka-Band Radar Interferometer . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 36 (1), 87--99, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0119.1

work page doi:10.1175/jtech-d-18-0119.1 2019
[28]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511629570

Wunsch, C., 1996: The Ocean Circulation Inverse Problem. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511629570

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511629570 1996
[29]

Balwada, C

Xiao, Q., D. Balwada, C. S. Jones, M. Herrero-Gonz \'a lez , K. S. Smith, and R. Abernathey, 2023: Reconstruction of Surface Kinematics From Sea Surface Height Using Neural Networks . Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 15 (10), e2023MS003\,709, doi:10.1029/2023MS003709

work page doi:10.1029/2023ms003709 2023
[30]

M., 1987: Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Functions : Volume I : Basic Results

Yaglom, A. M., 1987: Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Functions : Volume I : Basic Results . Springer New York

1987
[31]

Callies, 2025: Assessing Submesoscale Sea Surface Height Signals From the SWOT Mission

Zhang, X., and J. Callies, 2025: Assessing Submesoscale Sea Surface Height Signals From the SWOT Mission . Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 130 (10), e2025JC022\,879, doi:10.1029/2025JC022879

work page doi:10.1029/2025jc022879 2025