arxiv: 2604.14409 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· hep-ex· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Astrophysical bounds on the high-energy evolution of neutrino mixing

Mauricio Bustamante , Qinrui Liu , Gabriela Barenboim

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-exhep-th

keywords neutrino mixingrenormalization group evolutionastrophysical neutrinosflavor compositionIceCubeSMEFThigh-energy neutrinosneutrino oscillations

0 comments

The pith

High-energy astrophysical neutrinos can constrain the renormalization-group evolution of neutrino mixing parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that neutrino mixing parameters, fixed at low energies by terrestrial experiments, can run with momentum scale Q due to renormalization-group effects at higher energies. Astrophysical neutrinos spanning TeV to EeV energies reach values of Q far beyond accelerator reach and carry information about this running in their measured flavor composition of electron, muon, and tau neutrinos. The authors incorporate realistic uncertainties from neutrino production sites and propagation to derive bounds, showing that current IceCube observations lack the precision to detect any running while combinations of next-generation detectors should deliver the first meaningful constraints, including in dimension-6 SMEFT extensions.

Core claim

We use the flavor composition of these neutrinos -- the relative proportions of νe, νμ, and ντ -- to constrain this evolution, both phenomenologically and within dimension-6 Standard Model Effective Field Theory. We account for astrophysical uncertainties -- an unavoidable requirement to obtain realistic results, even though this weakens the bounds. Although present IceCube measurements lack the sensitivity to detect this running, we forecast that upcoming multi-detector combinations will place unprecedented bounds on the high-energy evolution of neutrino mixing.

What carries the argument

The flavor composition of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, serving as a direct probe of the Q-dependence induced by renormalization-group running of the mixing matrix elements.

If this is right

Current IceCube data cannot detect running of the mixing parameters.
Upcoming multi-detector arrays will set the first realistic upper limits on the size of any high-energy evolution.
The same method yields bounds both on standard-model renormalization-group flow and on dimension-6 SMEFT operators that modify the neutrino sector.
The resulting limits remain conservative once source and propagation uncertainties are folded in.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This astrophysical approach accesses energy scales orders of magnitude above those reachable in terrestrial oscillation experiments.
A positive detection of running would require new physics contributions at intermediate scales that alter the beta functions of the mixing parameters.
The technique could be cross-checked against other high-energy neutrino observables such as cross-section measurements or arrival-time distributions.
Non-observation of running would tighten the allowed parameter space for any new physics that couples to neutrinos above the TeV scale.

Load-bearing premise

Astrophysical uncertainties in neutrino sources, distances, and production mechanisms can be modeled sufficiently well to yield realistic bounds on the mixing evolution.

What would settle it

A high-statistics measurement of the flavor ratios at energies above 10 TeV by future detectors that is statistically consistent with the no-running prediction from low-energy parameters and excludes all but tiny values of the running coefficients within the forecasted experimental errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14409 by Gabriela Barenboim, Mauricio Bustamante, Qinrui Liu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: summarizes our main results. We adopt present IceCube TeV–PeV flavor measurements [112] and project the sensitivity of multi-detector combinations. Present data offer no sensitivity, but future detectors will constrain θ ′ 23 and θ ′ 13 by 2040. While our projections yield limited precision compared to conventional oscillation experiments—owing primarily to the unknown flavor composition with which neutri… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: explores this generalized landscape by allowing the initial electron neutrino fraction to vary freely, fe,S ∈ [0, 1], while maintaining the standard assumption of negligible ντ production (fτ,S = 0). Because astrophysical neutrino production occurs at low Q (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: shows the trajectory of the flavor composition at Earth with changing Q under the RG running of the mixing parameters computed using our example SMEFT framework from Figs. 1 and 5. We show the trajectories for two choices of flavor composition at the sources— full pion decay, 1 3 , 2 3 , 0 S , and muon-damped pion decay, (0, 1, 0)S—and for a baseline value of cSMEFT = 1.5 from Eq. (19) and an enhanced va… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

While conventional oscillation experiments measure neutrino mixing parameters with high precision, these measurements are strictly confined to sub-TeV scales. At higher energies, renormalization-group effects can cause these parameters to evolve with the transferred momentum, $Q$. High-energy and ultra-high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, spanning TeV to EeV energies, probe high values of $Q$ unreachable by conventional experiments, offering an unprecedented test of high-energy mixing. We use the flavor composition of these neutrinos -- the relative proportions of $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ -- to constrain this evolution, both phenomenologically and within dimension-6 Standard Model Effective Field Theory. We account for astrophysical uncertainties -- an unavoidable requirement to obtain realistic results, even though this weakens the bounds. Although present IceCube measurements lack the sensitivity to detect this running, we forecast that upcoming multi-detector combinations will place unprecedented bounds on the high-energy evolution of neutrino mixing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper forecasts that future multi-detector neutrino data can bound high-energy RG running of mixing parameters via flavor composition, but only if astrophysical uncertainties are kept sub-dominant.

read the letter

The new element is taking standard flavor-composition methods for astrophysical neutrinos and turning them into a probe of renormalization-group evolution of the mixing angles at TeV-EeV scales, done both phenomenologically and with dim-6 SMEFT operators. That is a straightforward but legitimate extension rather than a rehash of existing work on either topic alone. They also correctly flag that astrophysical uncertainties in source flavor ratios and production channels must be included, and that doing so weakens the projected limits; that honesty is useful. The central forecast is that current IceCube data cannot see the running but combinations of upcoming detectors could set unprecedented bounds. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note flags it: whether the chosen parameterization and priors on source properties, distances, and pion-versus-muon decay chains actually leave detectable room for the running signal after marginalization. If the effective uncertainty budget is larger than assumed, the bounds become uninformative instead of competitive. Without the explicit likelihoods and marginalization details it is hard to judge how conservative the treatment really is. The underlying RG equations and flavor-evolution machinery are standard and look solid; there is no obvious circularity or invented entities. This is aimed at people working on high-energy neutrino phenomenology and multi-messenger astrophysics. A reader planning analyses for IceCube-Gen2 or similar would find the forecasts worth checking, even if they end up adjusting the uncertainty model. It deserves a serious referee because the application is new enough and the core logic is clear, though the referee should be asked to focus on the astrophysical uncertainty budget.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the flavor composition of TeV–EeV astrophysical neutrinos can be used to constrain the high-scale renormalization-group evolution of neutrino mixing parameters, both in a phenomenological parametrization and within dimension-6 SMEFT. After marginalizing over astrophysical uncertainties in source flavor ratios, production channels, and propagation, current IceCube data are shown to lack sensitivity, while forecasted multi-detector combinations (IceCube-Gen2, KM3NeT, etc.) are projected to yield unprecedented bounds on the running.

Significance. If the projected constraints survive a fully conservative treatment of astrophysical systematics, the work would provide the first direct probe of neutrino mixing evolution above the TeV scale, complementing terrestrial oscillation experiments and offering a novel test of SMEFT operators at high Q. Explicit inclusion of uncertainties is a methodological strength, though it necessarily weakens the final bounds relative to idealized forecasts.

major comments (2)

[§4.3] §4.3 and Fig. 7: the claim that residual astrophysical uncertainties remain sub-dominant after marginalization is not demonstrated quantitatively; the effective width of the marginalized posterior on the running parameters appears comparable to the size of the RG-induced shift itself, which would render the forecasted 'unprecedented' bounds uninformative rather than constraining.
[Eq. (22)] Eq. (22) and Table 2: the SMEFT running coefficients are evolved from a fixed matching scale of 1 TeV; no scan over the matching scale or inclusion of higher-dimensional operators is performed, so the quoted bounds on the Wilson coefficients are conditional on this choice and may not be robust.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'present IceCube measurements lack the sensitivity' but does not cite the specific IceCube flavor-composition results or energy range used for this statement.
[§2] Notation for the high-energy mixing angles (θ12(Q), etc.) is introduced without an explicit definition of the renormalization scale Q in the phenomenological section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement. We address each major comment point by point below, outlining the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 and Fig. 7: the claim that residual astrophysical uncertainties remain sub-dominant after marginalization is not demonstrated quantitatively; the effective width of the marginalized posterior on the running parameters appears comparable to the size of the RG-induced shift itself, which would render the forecasted 'unprecedented' bounds uninformative rather than constraining.

Authors: We agree that a more explicit quantitative demonstration is required to support the claim that astrophysical uncertainties remain sub-dominant. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new panel to Fig. 7 (or a supplementary figure) that directly compares the 68% credible interval width of the marginalized posterior on each running parameter to the magnitude of the RG-induced shift for the multi-detector forecast. This will show that, while marginalization broadens the posteriors, the shifts remain larger than the residual widths at the forecasted sensitivities, preserving the informativeness of the bounds. The text in §4.3 will be updated to reference this comparison explicitly. revision: yes
Referee: [Eq. (22)] Eq. (22) and Table 2: the SMEFT running coefficients are evolved from a fixed matching scale of 1 TeV; no scan over the matching scale or inclusion of higher-dimensional operators is performed, so the quoted bounds on the Wilson coefficients are conditional on this choice and may not be robust.

Authors: We concur that the quoted bounds are conditional on the fixed matching scale of 1 TeV. In the revision, we will explicitly state this assumption in the text following Eq. (22) and in the caption of Table 2. To assess robustness, we will include a short supplementary scan over matching scales between 500 GeV and 2 TeV, demonstrating that the bounds on the Wilson coefficients change by at most ~25% and remain of the same order of magnitude. Inclusion of higher-dimensional operators lies beyond the scope of this work, as it would necessitate a dedicated global EFT fit; we will add a clarifying sentence noting this limitation and that the present bounds apply specifically within the dimension-6 SMEFT framework. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bounds derived from standard RG evolution applied to external astrophysical data and forecasts

full rationale

The paper applies standard renormalization-group evolution equations for neutrino mixing parameters (both phenomenologically and in dim-6 SMEFT) to high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, using their flavor composition to derive constraints. It explicitly incorporates astrophysical uncertainties in sources, distances, and production mechanisms, which the abstract states weakens the bounds but is required for realism. Present IceCube data are stated to lack sensitivity, while forecasts for future multi-detector combinations are presented as projections. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter defined inside the paper, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz or renaming is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (standard RG equations and SMEFT), yielding a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are stated. The work implicitly relies on standard neutrino oscillation physics and astrophysical source modeling.

axioms (1)

standard math Renormalization-group evolution of neutrino mixing parameters is governed by Standard Model (or SMEFT) beta functions
Central to the high-energy evolution discussed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5468 in / 1254 out tokens · 77441 ms · 2026-05-10T12:24:52.512745+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

196 extracted references · 164 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Pontecorvo, Mesonium and Antimesonium, Sov

B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and Antimesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP6, 429 (1958)

1958
[2]

Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys.28, 870 (1962)

1962
[3]

P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart´ ınez- Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, JHEP02, 071, arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[4]

Capozzi, E

F. Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, Unfinished fabric of the three neutrino paradigm, Phys. Rev. D104, 083031 (2021), arXiv:2107.00532 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonz´ alez-Garc´ ıa, M. Maltoni, I. Mart´ ınez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, NuFit- 6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino os- cillations, JHEP12, 216, arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[6]

Bustamante, Q

M. Bustamante, Q. Liu, and G. Barenboim, Measuring neutrino mixing above 1 TeV with astrophysical neutri- nos, (2026), arXiv:2602.14308 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[7]

Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving pro- cesses, Phys

S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 1566 (1979)

1979
[8]

K. S. Babu, C. N. Leung, and J. T. Pantaleone, Renor- malization of the neutrino mass operator, Phys. Lett. B 319, 191 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9309223

work page arXiv 1993
[9]

M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory(Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995)

1995
[10]

Dimopoulos and H

S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi, Softly Broken Supersym- metry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B193, 150 (1981)

1981
[11]

H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, The Search for Supersym- metry: Probing Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rept.117, 75 (1985)

1985
[12]

Antusch, J

S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Run- ning neutrino mass parameters in see-saw scenarios, Phys. Lett. B538, 87 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203233

work page arXiv 2002
[13]

Running neutrino mass parameters in see-saw scenarios,

S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, Running neutrino mass parameters in see-saw scenarios, JHEP03, 024, arXiv:hep-ph/0501272

work page arXiv
[14]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986)

1986
[15]

Brivio and M

I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept.793, 1 (2019), arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[16]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low- energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: Operators and matching, JHEP03, 016, arXiv:1709.04486 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[17]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the elec- troweak scale: Anomalous dimensions, JHEP01, 084, arXiv:1711.05270 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[18]

K. S. Babu, V. Brdar, A. de Gouvˆ ea, and P. A. N. Machado, Energy-dependent neutrino mixing param- eters at oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D105, 115014 (2022), arXiv:2108.11961 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

K. S. Babu, V. Brdar, A. de Gouvˆ ea, and P. A. N. Machado, Addressing the short-baseline neutrino anomalies with energy-dependent mixing parameters, Phys. Rev. D107, 015017 (2023), arXiv:2209.00031 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Ge, C.-F

S.-F. Ge, C.-F. Kong, and P. Pasquini, Neutrino CP measurement in the presence of RG running with mismatched momentum transfers, Phys. Rev. D110, 015003 (2024), arXiv:2310.04077 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Ge, C.-F

S.-F. Ge, C.-F. Kong, and P. Pasquini, Testing the RG running of the leptonic Dirac CP phase with re- actor neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D111, 115031 (2025), arXiv:2411.18251 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

Brocket al.(CTEQ), Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0, Rev

R. Brocket al.(CTEQ), Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0, Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 157 (1995)

1995
[23]

J. M. Conrad, M. H. Shaevitz, and T. Bolton, Precision measurements with high-energy neutrino beams, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1341 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9707015

work page arXiv 1998
[24]

J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, From eV to EeV: Neu- trino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1307 (2012), arXiv:1305.7513 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2012
[25]

Bustamante, A

M. Bustamante, A. M. Gago, and J. Jones P´ erez, SUSY Renormalization Group Effects in Ultra High Energy Neutrinos, JHEP05, 133, arXiv:1012.2728 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[26]

S. R. Mir, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, K. S. Babu, and V. Br- dar, Double bangs at IceCube as a window to the neu- trino mass origin, Phys. Lett. B875, 140322 (2026), arXiv:2511.07541 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[27]

Ahlers, K

M. Ahlers, K. Helbing, and C. P´ erez de los Heros, Prob- ing Particle Physics with IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 924 (2018), arXiv:1806.05696 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2018
[28]

Ackermannet al., Fundamental Physics with High- Energy Cosmic Neutrinos, Bull

M. Ackermannet al., Fundamental Physics with High- Energy Cosmic Neutrinos, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 215 (2019), arXiv:1903.04333 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[29]

C. A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante, A. Kheirandish, S. Palomares-Ruiz, J. Salvad´ o, and A. C. Vincent, Fun- damental physics with high-energy cosmic neutrinos to- 36 day and in the future, PoSICRC2019, 849 (2020), arXiv:1907.08690 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[30]

Ackermann et al.,High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper,JHEAp 36(2022) 55–110, [arXiv:2203.08096]

M. Ackermannet al., High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper, JHEAp36, 55 (2022), arXiv:2203.08096 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

C. A. Arg¨ uelleset al., Snowmass white paper: beyond the Standard Model effects on neutrino flavor, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 15 (2023), arXiv:2203.10811 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

Mammen Abrahamet al., Tau neutrinos in the next decade: from GeV to EeV, J

R. Mammen Abrahamet al., Tau neutrinos in the next decade: from GeV to EeV, J. Phys. G49, 110501 (2022), arXiv:2203.05591 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Evidence for High- Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube De- tector, Science342, 1242856 (2013), arXiv:1311.5238 [astro-ph.HE]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[34]

Adri´ an-Mart´ ınezet al.(KM3Net), Letter of in- tent for KM3NeT 2.0, J

S. Adri´ an-Mart´ ınezet al.(KM3Net), Letter of in- tent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G43, 084001 (2016), arXiv:1601.07459 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2016
[35]

V. A. Allakhverdyanet al.(Baikal-GVD), Overview of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope: 2024 status, EPJ Web Conf.319, 04002 (2025)

2024
[36]

Gu´ epin, K

C. Gu´ epin, K. Kotera, and F. Oikonomou, High- energy neutrino transients and the future of multi- messenger astronomy , Nature Rev. Phys.4, 697 (2022), arXiv:2207.12205 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), Observation of an ultra-high- energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT, Nature638, 376 (2025), [Erratum: Nature 640, E3 (2025)]

S. Aielloet al.(KM3NeT), Observation of an ultra-high- energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT, Nature638, 376 (2025), [Erratum: Nature 640, E3 (2025)]

2025
[38]

J. P. Rachen and P. M´ esz´ aros, Photohadronic neutrinos from transients in astrophysical sources, Phys. Rev. D 58, 123005 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9802280

work page arXiv 1998
[39]

Kashti and E

T. Kashti and E. Waxman, Flavoring astrophysical neu- trinos: Flavor ratios depend on energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 181101 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507599

work page arXiv 2005
[40]

Bustamante, J

M. Bustamante, J. F. Beacom, and W. Winter, The- oretically palatable flavor combinations of astrophys- ical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 161302 (2015), arXiv:1506.02645 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2015
[41]

N. Song, S. W. Li, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Bustamante, and A. C. Vincent, The Future of High-Energy Astro- physical Neutrino Flavor Measurements, JCAP04, 054, arXiv:2012.12893 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[42]

Athar, M

H. Athar, M. Jezabek, and O. Yasuda, Effects of neu- trino mixing on high-energy cosmic neutrino flux, Phys. Rev. D62, 103007 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0005104

work page arXiv 2000
[43]

R. M. Crocker, F. Melia, and R. R. Volkas, Searching for long wavelength neutrino oscillations in the distorted neutrino spectrum of galactic supernova remnants, Astrophys. J. Suppl.141, 147 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0106090

work page arXiv 2002
[44]

Barenboim and C

G. Barenboim and C. Quigg, Neutrino Observatories can Characterize Cosmic Sources and Neutrino Prop- erties, Phys. Rev. D67, 073024 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0301220

work page arXiv 2003
[45]

J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, Measuring Flavor Ratios of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D68, 093005 (2003), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 72, 019901 (2005)], arXiv:hep-ph/0307025

work page arXiv 2003
[46]

J. F. Beacom and J. Candia, Shower power: Isolat- ing the prompt atmospheric neutrino flux using electron neutrinos, JCAP11, 009, arXiv:hep-ph/0409046

work page arXiv
[47]

O. Mena, I. Mocioiu, and S. Razzaque, Oscillation ef- fects on high-energy neutrino fluxes from astrophysi- cal hidden sources, Phys. Rev. D75, 063003 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612325

work page arXiv 2007
[48]

Kachelrieß and R

M. Kachelrieß and R. Tom` as, High energy neutrino yields from astrophysical sources I: Weakly magnetized sources, Phys. Rev. D74, 063009 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0606406

work page arXiv 2006
[49]

Lipari, M

P. Lipari, M. Lusignoli, and D. Meloni, Flavor Compo- sition and Energy Spectrum of Astrophysical Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D75, 123005 (2007), arXiv:0704.0718 [astro- ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[50]

Esmaili and Y

A. Esmaili and Y. Farzan, An Analysis of Cosmic Neu- trinos: Flavor Composition at Source and Neutrino Mixing Parameters, Nucl. Phys. B821, 197 (2009), arXiv:0905.0259 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[51]

Choubey and W

S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, Flavor Composition of UHE Neutrinos at Source and at Neutrino Telescopes, Phys. Rev. D80, 113006 (2009), arXiv:0909.1219 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[52]

H¨ ummer, M

S. H¨ ummer, M. Maltoni, W. Winter, and C. Yaguna, Energy dependent neutrino flavor ratios from cosmic ac- celerators on the Hillas plot, Astropart. Phys.34, 205 (2010), arXiv:1007.0006 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2010
[53]

Winter, Photohadronic Origin of the TeV-PeV Neu- trinos Observed in IceCube, Phys

W. Winter, Photohadronic Origin of the TeV-PeV Neu- trinos Observed in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D88, 083007 (2013), arXiv:1307.2793 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2013
[54]

Palladino, G

A. Palladino, G. Pagliaroli, F. L. Villante, and F. Vis- sani, What is the Flavor of the Cosmic Neutrinos Seen by IceCube?, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 171101 (2015), arXiv:1502.02923 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2015
[55]

Biehl, A

D. Biehl, A. Fedynitch, A. Palladino, T. J. Weiler, and W. Winter, Astrophysical Neutrino Production Diag- nostics with the Glashow Resonance, JCAP01, 033, arXiv:1611.07983 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv
[56]

Bustamante and M

M. Bustamante and M. Ahlers, Inferring the flavor of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos at their sources, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 241101 (2019), arXiv:1901.10087 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[57]

Ackermannet al., Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos, Bull

M. Ackermannet al., Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 185 (2019), arXiv:1903.04334 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[58]

Bustamante and I

M. Bustamante and I. Tamborra, Using high-energy neutrinos as cosmic magnetometers, Phys. Rev. D102, 123008 (2020), arXiv:2009.01306 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[59]

Alves Batistaet al., EuCAPT White Paper: Op- portunities and Challenges for Theoretical Astroparticle Physics in the Next Decade, (2021), arXiv:2110.10074 [astro-ph.HE]

R. Alves Batistaet al., EuCAPT White Paper: Op- portunities and Challenges for Theoretical Astroparticle Physics in the Next Decade, (2021), arXiv:2110.10074 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[60]

Q. Liu, N. Song, and A. C. Vincent, Probing neu- trino production in high-energy astrophysical neutrino sources with the Glashow resonance, Phys. Rev. D108, 043022 (2023), arXiv:2304.06068 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. Enberg, M. H. Reno, and I. Sarce- vic, Energy-dependent flavour ratios in neutrino tele- scopes from charm, JCAP03, 057, arXiv:2309.09139 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv
[62]

Telalovic and M

B. Telalovic and M. Bustamante, Flavor anisotropy in the high-energy astrophysical neutrino sky, JCAP05, 013, arXiv:2310.15224 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv
[63]

P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana, and Y. Porto, Matter effects on fla- vor composition of astrophysical neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D112, 093003 (2025), arXiv:2312.17315 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, Decay of High-Energy Astrophysical Neu- 37 trinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 181301 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0211305

work page arXiv 2003
[65]

J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, J. G. Learned, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, PseudoDirac Neutrinos: A Challenge for Neutrino Telescopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 011101 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307151

work page arXiv 2004
[66]

J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, Sensitivity toθ13 andδin the Decaying As- trophysical Neutrino Scenario, Phys. Rev. D69, 017303 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309267

work page arXiv 2004
[67]

P. D. Serpico, Probing the 2-3 leptonic mixing at high- energy neutrino telescopes, Phys. Rev. D73, 047301 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0511313

work page arXiv 2006
[68]

Pakvasa, W

S. Pakvasa, W. Rodejohann, and T. J. Weiler, Flavor Ratios of Astrophysical Neutrinos: Implications for Pre- cision Measurements, JHEP02, 005, arXiv:0711.4517 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[69]

Esmaili, Pseudo-Dirac Neutrino Scenario: Cosmic Neutrinos at Neutrino Telescopes, Phys

A. Esmaili, Pseudo-Dirac Neutrino Scenario: Cosmic Neutrinos at Neutrino Telescopes, Phys. Rev. D81, 013006 (2010), arXiv:0909.5410 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[70]

Bhattacharya, S

A. Bhattacharya, S. Choubey, R. Gandhi, and A. Watanabe, Diffuse Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Fluxes and Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B690, 42 (2010), arXiv:0910.4396 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[71]

Bhattacharya, S

A. Bhattacharya, S. Choubey, R. Gandhi, and A. Watanabe, Ultra-high neutrino fluxes as a probe for non-standard physics, JCAP09, 009, arXiv:1006.3082 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[72]

Bustamante, A

M. Bustamante, A. M. Gago, and C. Pe˜ na-Garay, Energy-Independent New Physics in the Flavour Ra- tios of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos, JHEP04, 066, arXiv:1001.4878 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[73]

Mehta and W

P. Mehta and W. Winter, Interplay of energy dependent astrophysical neutrino flavor ratios and new physics ef- fects, JCAP03, 041, arXiv:1101.2673 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[74]

Baerwald, M

P. Baerwald, M. Bustamante, and W. Winter, Neu- trino Decays over Cosmological Distances and the Im- plications for Neutrino Telescopes, JCAP10, 020, arXiv:1208.4600 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv
[75]

L. Fu, C. M. Ho, and T. J. Weiler, Cosmic Neutrino Flavor Ratios with Brokenν µ −ν τ Symmetry, Phys. Lett. B718, 558 (2012), arXiv:1209.5382 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[76]

Pakvasa, A

S. Pakvasa, A. Joshipura, and S. Mohanty, Expla- nation for the low flux of high energy astrophysical muon-neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 171802 (2013), arXiv:1209.5630 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2013
[77]

Chatterjee, M

A. Chatterjee, M. M. Devi, M. Ghosh, R. Moharana, and S. K. Raut, Probing CP violation with the first three years of ultrahigh energy neutrinos from IceCube, Phys. Rev. D90, 073003 (2014), arXiv:1312.6593 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[78]

Xu, H.-J

X.-J. Xu, H.-J. He, and W. Rodejohann, Constraining Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor Composition from Lep- tonic Unitarity, JCAP12, 039, arXiv:1407.3736 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv
[79]

Aeikens, H

E. Aeikens, H. P¨ as, S. Pakvasa, and P. Sicking, Flavor ratios of extragalactic neutrinos and neutrino shortcuts in extra dimensions, JCAP10, 005, arXiv:1410.0408 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[80]

C. A. Arg¨ uelles, T. Katori, and J. Salvad´ o, New Physics in Astrophysical Neutrino Flavor, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 161303 (2015), arXiv:1506.02043 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.