arxiv: 2604.14483 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🧬 q-bio.PE

Recognition: unknown

Synchronized disease and behavioural dynamics in weakly coupled populations

Xinxuan Wang , Youngmin Park , Bryce Morsky

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE

keywords synchronizationdisease dynamicsvaccination behaviorcoupled populationsbehavioral epidemiologylimit cyclessocial influence

0 comments

The pith

Weak coupling through social influence synchronizes disease and vaccination cycles in two identical populations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two populations that each show sustained oscillations between infection levels and vaccination uptake due to feedback loops. It introduces a weak coupling mechanism where social influence from one group affects the behavioral decisions in the other. This coupling causes the oscillations to synchronize, meaning peaks and troughs align in time. Different sensitivities to payoffs in the two groups can instead produce anti-synchronization where one group's peak coincides with the other's trough.

Core claim

Two populations undergoing identical behavioral epidemiological limit cycles become synchronized in their disease and behavioral dynamics when weakly coupled through social influence on decisions. Different payoff sensitivities between the populations can lead to either synchronization or anti-synchronization.

What carries the argument

Weak coupling term that models social influence on behavioral decisions between the populations.

Load-bearing premise

The two populations have identical uncoupled dynamics and share the same behavioral epidemiological limit cycle.

What would settle it

Finding that the infection peaks in the two populations remain desynchronized despite measurable social influence between them would contradict the synchronization result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14483 by Bryce Morsky, Xinxuan Wang, Youngmin Park.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of best response function σ( ˜Ij , v˜j ) with different values for κ. The rate of change of vj under the Granovetter-Schelling dynamic is simply the difference between σ( ˜Ij , v˜j ) and vj . Reducing dimensions due to sj + Ij + Pj = 1, we can finally state the complete system of differential equations for j = 1, 2: S˙ j = α(1 − Sj − Ij ) − βSj ˜Ij − ηvjSj , (5a) ˙Ij = βSj ˜Ij − γIj , (5b) v˙j … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: One-parameter bifurcation diagram in the payoff sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Two-parameter bifurcation diagram in the payoff sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Components of the iPRC Z(t) = (ZS, ZI , Zv) for the uncoupled system, which measures the instantaneous phase change of each component by a small perturbation at time t. a negative phase shift ∆θ < 0, effectively resetting the system to an earlier phase where vaccination willingness was higher. Now that we have an understanding of how oscillator phases are derived, we turn to reducing the coupled system, wh… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Limit cycle and iPRC comparison. the added benefit of yielding an autonomous ODE: dθj dt = ε T Z T 0 Z(θj + ωt) · Gj (γ(θj + ωt), γ(θk + ωt)) dt = ε ωT Z T 0 Z(s) · Gj (γ(s), γ(θk − θj + s)) ds, (19) where the second line follows from a straightforward change in variables s = θj + ωt. We thus obtain the phase equations, ω dθj dt = εH(θk − θj ), j = 1, 2, k = 3 − j, (20) 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fi… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Coupling functions H(ϕ) and phase dynamics C(ϕ) for various values of κ and its bifurcation diagram. where a = ∂C′ (π,κ∗) ∂κ . Expand C(π + ψ, κ) around C(π, κ): C(π + ψ, κ) = C(π, κ) + C ′ (π, κ) · ψ + C ′′(π, κ) 2 · ψ 2 + C ′′′(π, κ) 6 · ψ 3 + O(ψ 5 ). (32) Since C(π, κ) = 0 and C ′ (π, κ) was previously calculated, the only term not accounted for 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Coupling function C(ϕ) and fixed point stability for the Physical Only model. The model does not exhibits a bifurcation at ϕ = π; anti-phase is unstable across all parameter values, and synchrony (ϕ = 0) is the unique stable fixed point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Coupling function C(ϕ) and fixed point stability for the Combined model. Like the Physical Only model, this model does not exhibits a bifurcation at ϕ = π; anti-phase is unstable across all parameter values, and synchrony (ϕ = 0) is the unique stable fixed point. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Bifurcation diagrams for parameters α and β in the Social Only Coupling model. Note that β shows the reverse direction compared to other parameters that exhibit subcritical pitchfork bifurcations B Bifurcation Diagrams for Other Parameters Beyond κ, several other parameters in the Social Only Coupling model also induce bifurcations at the anti-phase fixed point ϕ = π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p0… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Bifurcation diagrams for parameters δ and η in the Social Only Coupling model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Bifurcation diagrams for parameters δ and η in the Social Only Coupling model. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The spread of infectious disease is strongly influenced by social dynamics. In addition to infection risk, individuals vaccination decisions depend on prevailing social behavior: high infection levels and widespread vaccination can increase vaccine uptake, which in turn suppresses infection. This feedback can generate sustained oscillations in disease prevalence and vaccination behavior. Here, we study two such populations undergoing the same behavioral epidemiological limit cycle and introduce weak coupling between them through social influence. We show that coupling leads to synchronization of disease dynamics between the two groups. Moreover, we find that different payoff sensitivity may lead to synchronization or anti synchronization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Weak coupling produces synchronization in these behavioral-epidemiological oscillators, but the anti-synchronization result with mismatched payoff sensitivities rests on an unexamined assumption that the isolated cycles stay comparable.

read the letter

The paper couples two populations that each follow a behavioral-epidemiological limit cycle driven by infection-vaccination feedback. Weak social influence between them produces synchronization of prevalence and behavior; raising payoff sensitivity in one group can flip the outcome to anti-synchronization instead. That is the central claim and the only real novelty here—an incremental extension of existing single-population limit-cycle models to the two-group case with a simple coupling term through social payoffs. The setup is straightforward and the numerical evidence for synchronization itself looks clean under the weak-coupling regime they use. Credit for keeping the model minimal and for isolating the sensitivity parameter as the switch between in-phase and anti-phase locking. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note flags it. The abstract states that both populations undergo the same limit cycle before coupling is added, yet the anti-synchronization result is obtained by giving the groups different payoff sensitivities. That parameter directly changes the frequency and shape of the isolated oscillator, so the two systems are not identical. Standard weak-coupling theory for phase locking requires either matched natural frequencies or an explicit condition that overcomes detuning. The paper does not appear to report period comparisons or derive the locking threshold for detuned oscillators, which leaves the anti-synchronization claim dependent on the specific parameter choices that happened to be simulated. If the cycles differ by more than a few percent, the result is narrower than presented. This is the kind of work that belongs in a specialized journal on mathematical epidemiology or coupled dynamical systems. Readers already following behavioral epi models or multi-group synchronization will get the most from it; it is not broad enough or deep enough to interest a general audience. The core synchronization finding is solid enough to justify referee time, even though the anti-synchronization part will need tightening. I would send it out for review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper models two populations each exhibiting a behavioral-epidemiological limit cycle driven by infection risk and social influence on vaccination decisions. Weak coupling is introduced via social influence between the populations, and the central claim is that this coupling produces synchronization of disease prevalence and behavior; additionally, differing payoff sensitivities are reported to produce either synchronization or anti-synchronization.

Significance. If the synchronization and anti-synchronization results are rigorously established for the coupled limit-cycle oscillators, the work would provide a mechanistic explanation for coordinated epidemic waves across socially linked groups and highlight how behavioral parameters modulate phase relations. This could inform models of spatially or socially coupled outbreaks, though the strength depends on explicit verification that the claimed phase-locking persists under the model's parameter choices.

major comments (1)

Abstract: the statement that both populations 'undergo the same behavioral epidemiological limit cycle' before coupling is introduced is immediately followed by the claim that 'different payoff sensitivity may lead to synchronization or anti synchronization.' Payoff sensitivity enters the behavioral decision rule and therefore changes the frequency and waveform of the isolated limit cycle. Standard weak-coupling theory for phase locking or anti-phase locking assumes identical natural frequencies; when frequencies differ, anti-synchronization is not guaranteed and depends on detuning and the coupling function. The manuscript must therefore either demonstrate that the chosen sensitivity values keep the uncoupled periods within a few percent of each other or derive the locking condition for non-identical oscillators. Without this step the anti-synchronization result rests on an unstated and

minor comments (1)

The abstract supplies no equations, parameter values, or simulation details; the full text should include a concise statement of the model equations and the numerical methods used to detect synchronization (e.g., phase difference, cross-correlation thresholds).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. The central concern is that differing payoff sensitivities alter the natural frequencies of the uncoupled limit cycles, potentially invalidating the direct application of identical-oscillator weak-coupling theory to the anti-synchronization case. We address this point below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the statement that both populations 'undergo the same behavioral epidemiological limit cycle' before coupling is introduced is immediately followed by the claim that 'different payoff sensitivity may lead to synchronization or anti synchronization.' Payoff sensitivity enters the behavioral decision rule and therefore changes the frequency and waveform of the isolated limit cycle. Standard weak-coupling theory for phase locking or anti-phase locking assumes identical natural frequencies; when frequencies differ, anti-synchronization is not guaranteed and depends on detuning and the coupling function. The manuscript must therefore either demonstrate that the chosen sensitivity values keep the uncoupled periods within a few percent of each other or derive the locking condition for non-identical oscillators. Without this step the anti-synchronization result rests on an unstated and

Authors: We agree that payoff sensitivity modifies both the frequency and waveform of the isolated behavioral-epidemiological limit cycle, so the two populations are not strictly identical oscillators when sensitivities differ. Our numerical results for anti-synchronization were obtained for specific parameter pairs in which the uncoupled periods remain close enough for weak coupling to produce stable phase relations. To make this explicit, we will revise the manuscript as follows: (i) add a short paragraph (or table) reporting the uncoupled periods for all sensitivity values used in the figures; (ii) state in the abstract and methods that the populations undergo similar, but not identical, limit cycles when sensitivities differ; and (iii) note that the observed synchronization/anti-synchronization is consistent with small detuning under weak coupling. We will not attempt a full analytic derivation for non-identical oscillators, as that lies outside the paper’s scope, but the added numerical verification will remove the unstated assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of introducing weak coupling into two identical behavioral-epidemiological limit-cycle oscillators and analyzing the resulting synchronization behavior via standard dynamical-systems techniques. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any central claim rest on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified or defined in terms of the target result. The abstract and described model equations are self-contained; the synchronization and anti-synchronization statements follow from the coupled equations rather than from tautological re-labeling of inputs. This is the normal, non-circular outcome for an analysis of weakly coupled oscillators.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of limit cycles in the uncoupled behavioral-epidemiological model and on the specific form of weak social coupling; these are introduced without independent evidence beyond the modeling framework itself.

free parameters (2)

coupling strength
Parameter controlling the magnitude of social influence between the two populations; assumed small (weak coupling).
payoff sensitivity
Parameter(s) governing how strongly vaccination decisions respond to perceived costs and benefits; varied to obtain sync versus anti-sync regimes.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Each isolated population exhibits sustained oscillations (limit cycles) in disease prevalence and vaccination behavior arising from infection-behavior feedback.
This is the base state assumed before introducing coupling.
domain assumption Coupling between populations occurs weakly and exclusively through social influence on behavioral (vaccination) decisions.
Defines the interaction mechanism used to derive synchronization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5385 in / 1322 out tokens · 58833 ms · 2026-05-10T11:11:34.664652+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

[1]

Guilt in games.American Economic Review, 97(2):170–176, 2007

Pierpaolo Battigalli and Martin Dufwenberg. Guilt in games.American Economic Review, 97(2):170–176, 2007

2007
[2]

Behavioral epidemiology of 16 infectious diseases: an overview.Modeling the interplay between human behavior and the spread of infectious diseases, pages 1–19, 2012

Chris Bauch, Alberto d’Onofrio, and Piero Manfredi. Behavioral epidemiology of 16 infectious diseases: an overview.Modeling the interplay between human behavior and the spread of infectious diseases, pages 1–19, 2012

2012
[3]

Niklas Bobrovitz, Harriet Ware, Xiaomeng Ma, Zihan Li, Reza Hosseini, Christian Cao, Anabel Selemon, Mairead Whelan, Zahra Premji, Hanane Issa, et al. Protective effectiveness of previous sars-cov-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omi- cron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression.The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 23(5):...

2023
[4]

Synchronization in epidemic growth and the impossibility of selective containment.Mathematical Medicine and Biology: a Journal of the IMA, 38(4):467–473, 2021

Jan C Budich and Emil J Bergholtz. Synchronization in epidemic growth and the impossibility of selective containment.Mathematical Medicine and Biology: a Journal of the IMA, 38(4):467–473, 2021

2021
[5]

Andrew William Byrne, David McEvoy, Aine B Collins, Kevin Hunt, Miriam Casey, Ann Barber, Francis Butler, John Griffin, Elizabeth A Lane, Conor McAloon, et al. In- ferred duration of infectious period of sars-cov-2: rapid scoping review and analysis of available evidence for asymptomatic and symptomatic covid-19 cases.BMJ open, 10(8):e039856, 2020

2020
[6]

Seasonal synchroniza- tion and unpredictability in epidemic models with waning immunity and healthcare thresholds.Scientific Reports, 15(1):17190, 2025

Veronika Eclerov ´a, Deeptajyoti Sen, and Lenka P ˇribylov´a. Seasonal synchroniza- tion and unpredictability in epidemic models with waning immunity and healthcare thresholds.Scientific Reports, 15(1):17190, 2025

2025
[7]

Type i membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony.Neural Computation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

Bard Ermentrout. Type i membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony.Neural Computation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

1996
[8]

Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynam- ical systems: a guide to xppaut for researchers and students.Applied Mechanics Re- views, 56(4):B53–B53, 2003

Bard Ermentrout and Ajay Mahajan. Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynam- ical systems: a guide to xppaut for researchers and students.Applied Mechanics Re- views, 56(4):B53–B53, 2003

2003
[9]

Springer, 2010

Bard Ermentrout and David M Terman.Mathematical foundations of neuroscience, vol- ume 35. Springer, 2010

2010
[10]

State policies increase vaccination by shaping social norms.Scientific Reports, 13(1):21227, 2023

Bita Fayaz-Farkhad, Haesung Jung, Christopher Calabrese, and Dolores Albar- racin. State policies increase vaccination by shaping social norms.Scientific Reports, 13(1):21227, 2023

2023
[11]

Phase locking, the moran effect and distance decay of synchrony: experimental tests in a model system.Ecology Letters, 14(2):163–168, 2011

Jeremy W Fox, David A Vasseur, Stephen Hausch, and Jodie Roberts. Phase locking, the moran effect and distance decay of synchrony: experimental tests in a model system.Ecology Letters, 14(2):163–168, 2011

2011
[12]

The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16):6872–6877, 2009

Sebastian Funk, Erez Gilad, Chris Watkins, and Vincent AA Jansen. The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16):6872–6877, 2009

2009
[13]

Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(50):1247–1256, 2010

Sebastian Funk, Marcel Salath´e, and Vincent AA Jansen. Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(50):1247–1256, 2010. 17

2010
[14]

Oscillatory dynamics in the dilemma of social distanc- ing.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 476(2243), 2020

Alina Glaubitz and Feng Fu. Oscillatory dynamics in the dilemma of social distanc- ing.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 476(2243), 2020

2020
[15]

Waning immunity after the bnt162b2 vaccine in israel.New England Journal of Medicine, 385(24):e85, 2021

Yair Goldberg, Micha Mandel, Yinon M Bar-On, Omri Bodenheimer, Laurence Freed- man, Eric J Haas, Ron Milo, Sharon Alroy-Preis, Nachman Ash, and Amit Hup- pert. Waning immunity after the bnt162b2 vaccine in israel.New England Journal of Medicine, 385(24):e85, 2021

2021
[16]

When can dispersal synchronize populations? Theoretical population biology, 73(3):395–402, 2008

Eli E Goldwyn and Alan Hastings. When can dispersal synchronize populations? Theoretical population biology, 73(3):395–402, 2008

2008
[17]

The roles of the moran effect and dispersal in syn- chronizing oscillating populations.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 289:237–246, 2011

Eli E Goldwyn and Alan Hastings. The roles of the moran effect and dispersal in syn- chronizing oscillating populations.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 289:237–246, 2011

2011
[18]

Threshold models of collective behavior.American journal of soci- ology, 83(6):1420–1443, 1978

Mark Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior.American journal of soci- ology, 83(6):1420–1443, 1978

1978
[19]

The impact of stochasticity on the behaviour of nonlinear population models: synchrony and the moran effect.Oikos, 93(2):343– 351, 2001

JV Greenman and Timothy Guy Benton. The impact of stochasticity on the behaviour of nonlinear population models: synchrony and the moran effect.Oikos, 93(2):343– 351, 2001

2001
[20]

Md Nazmul Hassan, Md Shahriar Mahmud, Kaniz Fatema Nipa, and Md Kamrujja- man. Mathematical modeling and covid-19 forecast in texas, usa: a prediction model analysis and the probability of disease outbreak.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 17:e19, 2023

2023
[21]

Descriptive norms caused increases in mask wearing during the covid-19 pandemic.Scientific reports, 13(1):11856, 2023

Samantha L Heiman, Scott Claessens, Jessica D Ayers, Diego Guevara Beltr ´an, An- drew Van Horn, Edward R Hirt, Athena Aktipis, and Peter M Todd. Descriptive norms caused increases in mask wearing during the covid-19 pandemic.Scientific reports, 13(1):11856, 2023

2023
[22]

MIT Press, 2007

Eugene M Izhikevich.Dynamical systems in neuroscience. MIT Press, 2007

2007
[23]

The impact of fear and behavior response to established and novel diseases.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 85(2):687–710, 2025

Avneet Kaur, Rebecca C Tyson, and Iain R Moyles. The impact of fear and behavior response to established and novel diseases.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 85(2):687–710, 2025

2025
[24]

Chemical turbulence

Yoshiki Kuramoto. Chemical turbulence. InChemical oscillations, waves, and turbu- lence, pages 111–140. Springer, 1984

1984
[25]

Springer, 1998

Yuri A Kuznetsov.Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer, 1998

1998
[26]

Social influences on mask-wearing inten- tions during the covid-19 pandemic.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(10):e12817, 2023

Nikolette P Lipsey and Joy E Losee. Social influences on mask-wearing inten- tions during the covid-19 pandemic.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(10):e12817, 2023

2023
[27]

Spatial heterogeneity in epidemic models.Journal of theoretical biology, 179(1):1–11, 1996

Alun L Lloyd and Robert M May. Spatial heterogeneity in epidemic models.Journal of theoretical biology, 179(1):1–11, 1996. 18

1996
[28]

Methods of poincare and liapunov in theory of non-linear oscillations

IG Malkin. Methods of poincare and liapunov in theory of non-linear oscillations. Gostexizdat, Moscow, 1949

1949
[29]

Vaccination and collective action under social norms.Bulletin of Math- ematical Biology, 87(5):55, 2025

Bryce Morsky. Vaccination and collective action under social norms.Bulletin of Math- ematical Biology, 87(5):55, 2025

2025
[30]

False beliefs can bootstrap cooperative communities through social norms.Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, 2021

Bryce Morsky and Erol Akc ¸ay. False beliefs can bootstrap cooperative communities through social norms.Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3, 2021

2021
[31]

The impact of thresh- old decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(19):e2221479120, 2023

Bryce Morsky, Felicia Magpantay, Troy Day, and Erol Akc ¸ay. The impact of thresh- old decision mechanisms of collective behavior on disease spread.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(19):e2221479120, 2023

2023
[32]

Mathematical assessment of the role of human behavior changes on sars-cov-2 transmission dy- namics in the united states.Bulletin of mathematical biology, 86(8):92, 2024

Binod Pant, Salman Safdar, Mauricio Santillana, and Abba B Gumel. Mathematical assessment of the role of human behavior changes on sars-cov-2 transmission dy- namics in the united states.Bulletin of mathematical biology, 86(8):92, 2024

2024
[33]

The utility of phase models in studying neural synchronization.Computational models of brain and behavior, pages 493–504, 2017

Youngmin Park, Stewart Heitmann, and G Bard Ermentrout. The utility of phase models in studying neural synchronization.Computational models of brain and behavior, pages 493–504, 2017

2017
[34]

A simulation analysis to characterize the dynamics of vaccinating behaviour on contact networks.BMC Infectious Diseases, 9(1):77, 2009

Ana Perisic and Chris T Bauch. A simulation analysis to characterize the dynamics of vaccinating behaviour on contact networks.BMC Infectious Diseases, 9(1):77, 2009

2009
[35]

Understanding the coevolution of mask wearing and epidemics: A network per- spective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(26):e2123355119, 2022

Zirou Qiu, Baltazar Espinoza, Vitor V Vasconcelos, Chen Chen, Sara M Constantino, Stefani A Crabtree, Luojun Yang, Anil Vullikanti, Jiangzhuo Chen, J¨orgen Weibull, et al. Understanding the coevolution of mask wearing and epidemics: A network per- spective.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(26):e2123355119, 2022

2022
[36]

Nathaniel Rabb, Jake Bowers, David Glick, Kevin H Wilson, and David Yokum. The influence of social norms varies with “others” groups: Evidence from covid-19 vacci- nation intentions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(29):e2118770119, 2022

2022
[37]

Synchrony in popula- tion dynamics.Proceedings of the royal society of London

Esa Ranta, Veijo Kaitala, Jan Lindstr ¨om, and Harto Linden. Synchrony in popula- tion dynamics.Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 262(1364):113–118, 1995

1995
[38]

Matthew Ryan, Emily Brindal, Mick Roberts, and Roslyn I Hickson. A behaviour and disease transmission model: incorporating the health belief model for human behaviour into a simple transmission model.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 21(215), 2024

2024
[39]

Springer, 2007

Jan A Sanders, Ferdinand Verhulst, and James Murdock.Averaging methods in non- linear dynamical systems, volume 59. Springer, 2007

2007
[40]

Dynamic models of segregation.Journal of mathematical sociol- ogy, 1(2):143–186, 1971

Thomas C Schelling. Dynamic models of segregation.Journal of mathematical sociol- ogy, 1(2):143–186, 1971. 19

1971
[41]

Schwemmer and Timothy J

Michael A. Schwemmer and Timothy J. Lewis. The theory of weakly coupled os- cillators. In Nathan W. Schultheiss, Astrid A. Prinz, and Robert J. Butera, editors, Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience: Theory, Experiment, and Analysis, pages 3–31. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2012

2012
[42]

Joshua S Weitz, Sang Woo Park, Ceyhun Eksin, and Jonathan Dushoff. Awareness- driven behavior changes can shift the shape of epidemics away from peaks and to- ward plateaus, shoulders, and oscillations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 117(51):32764–32771, 2020

2020
[43]

Harnessing case isolation and ring vaccination to control ebola.PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 9(5):e0003794, 2015

Chad Wells, Dan Yamin, Martial L Ndeffo-Mbah, Natasha Wenzel, Stephen G Gaffney, Jeffrey P Townsend, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Mosoka Fallah, Tolbert G Nyenswah, Frederick L Altice, et al. Harnessing case isolation and ring vaccination to control ebola.PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 9(5):e0003794, 2015

2015
[44]

Infection prevention behaviour and infectious disease modelling: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future.BMC public health, 18(1):336, 2018

Dale Weston, Katharina Hauck, and Richard Amlˆot. Infection prevention behaviour and infectious disease modelling: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future.BMC public health, 18(1):336, 2018

2018
[45]

Sociocultural determinants of global mask-wearing behav- ior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(41):e2213525119, 2022

Luojun Yang, Sara M Constantino, Bryan T Grenfell, Elke U Weber, Simon A Levin, and V´ıtor V Vasconcelos. Sociocultural determinants of global mask-wearing behav- ior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(41):e2213525119, 2022

2022
[46]

Synchronized and mixed outbreaks of coupled recurrent epidemics.Scientific reports, 7(1):2424, 2017

Muhua Zheng, Ming Zhao, Byungjoon Min, and Zonghua Liu. Synchronized and mixed outbreaks of coupled recurrent epidemics.Scientific reports, 7(1):2424, 2017. A Phase Reduction for Physical Coupling and Combined Coupling The phase reduction analysis for the Physical Only and Combined Coupling models fol- lows the same procedure as the Social Only model. Not...

2017