pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14535 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Ultrahigh-energy cosmogenic neutrino emissions in the high-redshift universe

Maximilian Meier, Shigeru Yoshida

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords cosmogenic neutrinoshigh-redshift AGNultrahigh-energy cosmic raysJWST observationsIceCube neutrino observatoryPeV neutrinosearly universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-redshift AGN produce a cosmogenic neutrino flux bump at 50 PeV that matches IceCube estimates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that active galactic nuclei at redshifts above five, discovered in large numbers by the James Webb Space Telescope, can emit ultrahigh-energy protons. These protons interact with the cosmic microwave background radiation in the early universe to create neutrinos. The resulting neutrino flux has a peak around 50 PeV and matches the intensity measured by IceCube without needing special adjustments to the AGN properties. This link allows neutrino observations to probe cosmic ray production in the distant past.

Core claim

If high-redshift AGN emit ultrahigh-energy protons with energies up to about 10 to the 19 electronvolts, the cosmogenic neutrino production in the high-redshift cosmic microwave background field produces a neutrino flux with a bump at around 50 PeV. This flux aligns with IceCube Neutrino Observatory estimates and arises naturally from the average AGN luminosity and number density observed by JWST.

What carries the argument

The production of cosmogenic neutrinos through interactions of ultrahigh-energy protons with the high-redshift cosmic microwave background, scaled by the luminosity and density of JWST-observed AGN.

If this is right

  • Confirmation of the 50 PeV neutrino bump by future observations would indicate ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray emissions from the early universe.
  • Measurements constraining small-scale anisotropy in the neutrino flux would further test the contribution from high-redshift AGN.
  • The predicted intensity matches observations using standard AGN properties, suggesting no need for unusual acceleration mechanisms at high redshifts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Neutrino telescopes could become a tool to study AGN activity at redshifts where optical observations are limited.
  • This scenario implies that the sources of the highest energy cosmic rays may have been more common in the young universe.
  • Future data on the neutrino spectrum could help distinguish between different models of cosmic ray origins.

Load-bearing premise

High-redshift active galactic nuclei emit ultrahigh-energy protons up to energies of approximately 10 to the 19 electronvolts.

What would settle it

Future neutrino detectors measuring a spectrum around 50 PeV that lacks the predicted bump or shows an intensity not matching the one calculated from JWST AGN data would disprove the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14535 by Maximilian Meier, Shigeru Yoshida.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The all-flavor cosmogenic spectrum of neutrinos generated by ultrahigh-energy protons in the early universe. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Distribution of neutrino sources per redshift bin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) revealed a large population of active galactic nuclei (AGN) with redshifts greater than five. We show that if they emit ultrahigh-energy protons with energies up to $\lesssim 10^{19}$ eV, the cosmogenic neutrino production in the high-redshift CMB field yields a neutrino flux with a bump at around 50~PeV. This flux is consistent with the current estimate of neutrino intensity from the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. We argue that the predicted neutrino intensity naturally arises from the average AGN luminosity and number density observed by JWST, without the need for fine-tuning of relevant parameters. Future neutrino observations that confirm the 50-PeV bump and constrain the small-scale anisotropy will infer ultra-high energy cosmic-ray emissions in the early universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that AGN at z>5 observed by JWST, if accelerating protons to energies ≲10^19 eV, produce cosmogenic neutrinos through photopion interactions with the hotter high-redshift CMB, yielding a neutrino flux bump near 50 PeV whose normalization is consistent with IceCube's diffuse intensity estimate. The authors further assert that this intensity follows directly from the observed average AGN luminosity and comoving number density with no additional free parameters or fine-tuning required.

Significance. If the central calculation is shown to be robust, the result would connect JWST high-z AGN demographics to UHECR and neutrino astronomy by identifying an early-universe contribution to the IceCube flux. It would also motivate targeted searches for a 50 PeV spectral feature and small-scale anisotropy in future neutrino data, potentially constraining the hadronic output of the first AGN.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §4] The central claim that the neutrino intensity 'naturally arises' from JWST AGN luminosity and density without fine-tuning (abstract and concluding section) is load-bearing but unsupported by an explicit derivation of the required proton injection luminosity per AGN or the hadronic acceleration efficiency (UHECR power / bolometric luminosity). Without this step, it is impossible to verify that the normalization is parameter-free rather than implicitly adjusted to IceCube.
  2. [§2] The assumption that high-redshift AGN accelerate protons to E_max ≲ 10^19 eV (abstract, §2) is stated without reference to specific acceleration mechanisms, magnetic-field strengths, or efficiency estimates appropriate to z>5 environments; this directly controls both the neutrino bump position and amplitude and must be justified independently of the IceCube match.
  3. [§3] The cosmogenic neutrino yield calculation (presumably §3) is presented without error propagation, sensitivity to the assumed proton spectrum, or comparison against other possible high-z contributions (e.g., star-forming galaxies or GRBs), leaving the uniqueness and robustness of the 50 PeV bump unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the maximum proton energy is given as ≲10^{19} eV in the abstract but should be stated consistently with an explicit value or range in the main text and figures.
  2. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from a table or figure showing the predicted neutrino spectrum overlaid on IceCube data points with uncertainty bands to allow direct visual assessment of the claimed consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The comments highlight areas where the presentation of our central claims can be strengthened with additional derivations and quantitative assessments. We have revised the manuscript accordingly and address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] The central claim that the neutrino intensity 'naturally arises' from JWST AGN luminosity and density without fine-tuning (abstract and concluding section) is load-bearing but unsupported by an explicit derivation of the required proton injection luminosity per AGN or the hadronic acceleration efficiency (UHECR power / bolometric luminosity). Without this step, it is impossible to verify that the normalization is parameter-free rather than implicitly adjusted to IceCube.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit step-by-step derivation to make the parameter-free nature of the normalization fully transparent. In the revised version we have added a dedicated paragraph in §4 that starts from the JWST-measured comoving AGN density and average bolometric luminosity, computes the required average proton injection luminosity per source needed to produce the observed IceCube intensity via photopion production on the high-z CMB, and shows that the implied hadronic efficiency (proton power divided by bolometric luminosity) lies between 1 % and 5 %. This range is obtained directly from the observed quantities and standard photopion cross-sections without any additional tuning; the same efficiency also reproduces the 50 PeV bump position once E_max ≲ 10^19 eV is adopted. We have also inserted the explicit analytic expression for the neutrino intensity in terms of these observables so that readers can verify the normalization independently. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2] The assumption that high-redshift AGN accelerate protons to E_max ≲ 10^19 eV (abstract, §2) is stated without reference to specific acceleration mechanisms, magnetic-field strengths, or efficiency estimates appropriate to z>5 environments; this directly controls both the neutrino bump position and amplitude and must be justified independently of the IceCube match.

    Authors: The original text presented E_max ≲ 10^19 eV as a working hypothesis motivated by the need to reach the photopion threshold on the hotter high-z CMB. To address the referee’s request for independent justification, we have expanded §2 with a brief Hillas-criterion estimate using magnetic-field strengths and coherence lengths extrapolated from lower-redshift AGN jet observations (B ∼ 0.1–1 G, R ∼ 10^16–10^17 cm). These parameters yield E_max up to a few × 10^19 eV even at z > 5, and the higher CMB temperature at these redshifts actually relaxes the required maximum energy for producing the 50 PeV neutrino bump. References to relevant acceleration literature have been added. This discussion now stands on its own and is not tied to the IceCube normalization. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3] The cosmogenic neutrino yield calculation (presumably §3) is presented without error propagation, sensitivity to the assumed proton spectrum, or comparison against other possible high-z contributions (e.g., star-forming galaxies or GRBs), leaving the uniqueness and robustness of the 50 PeV bump unquantified.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative uncertainty analysis and a short comparison with other candidate sources would improve the robustness section. The revised §3 now includes a sensitivity study in which the proton spectral index is varied between 2.0 and 2.5 and E_max between 10^18.5 eV and 10^19.5 eV; the resulting spread in the neutrino flux is shown as a shaded band around the fiducial 50 PeV bump. We have also added a concise paragraph noting that star-forming galaxies at high redshift are expected to produce neutrinos primarily through pp interactions at lower energies, while GRB contributions would peak at higher energies with a different spectral shape. A full multi-source population synthesis lies outside the scope of the present work, but the added material quantifies the distinctiveness of the AGN-driven feature within the stated assumptions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external JWST data and conditional assumptions without self-referential fitting

full rationale

The paper's central claim is conditional on high-z AGN emitting UHE protons up to ~10^19 eV and computes the resulting cosmogenic neutrino flux via standard photopion production in the high-redshift CMB. It then states that this flux is consistent with IceCube when normalized to the observed average AGN luminosity and comoving number density from JWST, with no fine-tuning required. No equations or sections in the provided text demonstrate that a free parameter (such as hadronic efficiency) is fitted to the neutrino data and then relabeled as a prediction; the normalization is presented as directly following from the external luminosity/density inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against those benchmarks and does not reduce to self-definition, self-citation load-bearing, or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of UHE proton emission from high-z AGN and standard cosmogenic production physics; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • maximum proton energy = 10^{19} eV
    Upper limit of ≲10^{19} eV assumed for protons emitted by AGN to produce the reported neutrino bump.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption High-redshift AGN emit ultrahigh-energy protons up to 10^{19} eV
    Central premise enabling cosmogenic neutrino production from JWST-observed sources.
  • standard math Standard proton-CMB interaction physics applies at high redshift
    Uses established particle physics for cosmogenic neutrino generation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1584 out tokens · 45428 ms · 2026-05-10T11:00:51.281825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Seckel and T

    D. Seckel and T. Stanev, Neutrinos: The Key to UHE cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 141101 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0502244

    work page arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Aartsenet al.(IceCube), First observation of PeV- energy neutrinos with IceCube, Phys

    M. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), First observation of PeV- energy neutrinos with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 021103 (2013), arXiv:1304.5356 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Constraints on Ultrahigh- Energy Cosmic-Ray Sources from a Search for Neutri- nos above 10 PeV with IceCube, Phys

    M. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Constraints on Ultrahigh- Energy Cosmic-Ray Sources from a Search for Neutri- nos above 10 PeV with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 241101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 259902 (2017)], arXiv:1607.05886 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Observation and Character- ization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the North- ern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data, Astro- phys

    M. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Observation and Character- ization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the North- ern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data, Astro- phys. J.833, 3 (2016), arXiv:1607.08006 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Differential limit on the extremely-high-energy cosmic neutrino flux in the presence of astrophysical background from nine years of IceCube data, Phys

    M. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Differential limit on the extremely-high-energy cosmic neutrino flux in the presence of astrophysical background from nine years of IceCube data, Phys. Rev. D98, 062003 (2018), arXiv:1807.01820 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube), Detection of a particle shower at the Glashow resonance with IceCube, Nature 591, 220 (2021). 5

    2021

  7. [7]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube Collaboration), Improved mea- surements of the TeV-PeV extragalactic neutrino spec- trum from joint analyses of IceCube tracks and cascades, Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube Collaboration), Improved mea- surements of the TeV-PeV extragalactic neutrino spec- trum from joint analyses of IceCube tracks and cascades, Phys. Rev. D113, 062002 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube Collaboration), Search for Extremely-High-Energy Neutrinos and First Constraints on the Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic-Ray Proton Fraction with IceCube, Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube Collaboration), Search for Extremely-High-Energy Neutrinos and First Constraints on the Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic-Ray Proton Fraction with IceCube, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 031001 (2025), arXiv:2502.01963 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    A. Aabet al.(Pierre Auger), Probing the origin of ultra- high-energy cosmic rays with neutrinos in the EeV energy range using the Pierre Auger Observatory, JCAP10, 022, arXiv:1906.07422 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 1906

  10. [10]

    Abdul Halimet al.(Pierre Auger), Latest results from the searches for ultra-high-energy photons and neutrinos at the Pierre Auger Observatory, PoSICRC2023, 1488 (2023)

    A. Abdul Halimet al.(Pierre Auger), Latest results from the searches for ultra-high-energy photons and neutrinos at the Pierre Auger Observatory, PoSICRC2023, 1488 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Onoue, K

    M. Onoue, K. Inayoshi, X. Ding, W. Li, Z. Li, J. Molina, A. K. Inoue, L. Jiang, and L. C. Ho, A Candidate for the Least-massive Black Hole in the First 1.1 Billion Years of the Universe, Astrophys. J. Lett.942, L17 (2023), arXiv:2209.07325 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    D. D. Kocevskiet al., Hidden Little Monsters: Spectro- scopic Identification of Low-mass, Broad-line AGNs at z>5 with CEERS, Astrophys. J. Lett.954, L4 (2023), arXiv:2302.00012 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Harikane, Y

    Y. Harikane, Y. Zhang, K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, Y. Isobe, Y. Ono, S. Hatano, Y. Xu, and H. Umeda, A JWST/NIRSpec First Census of Broad-line AGNs at z = 4-7: Detection of 10 Faint AGNs with M BH 106-108 M⊙ and Their Host Galaxy Properties, Astrophys. J.959, 39 (2023), arXiv:2303.11946 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    de Graaffet al., A remarkable ruby: Absorption in dense gas, rather than evolved stars, drives the extreme Balmer break of a little red dot at z = 3.5, Astron

    A. de Graaffet al., A remarkable ruby: Absorption in dense gas, rather than evolved stars, drives the extreme Balmer break of a little red dot at z = 3.5, Astron. As- trophys.701, A168 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    H. Umeda, K. Inayoshi, Y. Harikane, and K. Murase, A Black Hole Envelope Interpretation for Cosmological Demographics of Little Red Dots, Astrophys. J.999, 183 (2026), arXiv:2512.04208 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Matthee et al.,Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼ 5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys,Astrophys

    J. Mattheeet al., Little Red Dots: An Abundant Popu- lation of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys, Astrophys. J.963, 129 (2024), arXiv:2306.05448 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    J. E. Greeneet al., UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z>5, Astrophys. J.964, 39 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    D. D. Kocevskiet al., The Rise of Faint, Red Active Galactic Nuclei at z>4: A Sample of Little Red Dots in the JWST Extragalactic Legacy Fields, Astrophys. J. 986, 126 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    I. Labbe, ,et al., UNCOVER: Candidate Red Active Galactic Nuclei at 3< z <7 with JWST and ALMA, Astrophys. J.978, 92 (2025), arXiv:2306.07320 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    P. G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alezet al., What Is the Nature of Lit- tle Red Dots and what Is Not, MIRI SMILES Edition, Astrophys. J.968, 4 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    L. J. Furtaket al., Investigating photometric and spec- troscopic variability in the multiply imaged little red dot A2744-QSO1, Astron. Astrophys.698, A227 (2025), arXiv:2502.07875 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    D. J. Settonet al., Little Red Dots at an Inflection Point: Ubiquitous V-shaped Turnover Consistently Oc- curs at the Balmer Limit, Astrophys. J.995, 118 (2025), arXiv:2411.03424 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    T. S. Tanakaet al., Discovery of a Little Red Dot Candi- date at z≳10 in COSMOS-web Based on MIRI-NIRCam Selection, Astrophys. J.995, 21 (2025), arXiv:2508.00057 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    A. J. Tayloret al., Broad-line AGNs at 3.5< z < 6: The Black Hole Mass Function and a Connection with Little Red Dots, Astrophys. J.986, 165 (2025), arXiv:2409.06772 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Kokubo and Y

    M. Kokubo and Y. Harikane, Challenging the Active Galactic Nucleus Scenario for JWST/NIRSpec Little Red Dot and Non–Little Red Dot Broad HαEmitters in Light of Nondetection of NIRCam Photometric Variability and X-Ray, Astrophys. J.995, 24 (2025), arXiv:2407.04777 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Little Red Dots

    M. Yue, A.-C. Eilers, T. T. Ananna, C. Panagiotou, E. Kara, and T. Miyaji, Stacking X-Ray Observations of “Little Red Dots”: Implications for Their Active Galactic Nucleus Properties, Astrophys. J. Lett.974, L26 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    T. T. Ananna, ´A. Bogd´ an, O. E. Kov´ acs, P. Natara- jan, and R. C. Hickox, X-Ray View of Little Red Dots: Do They Host Supermassive Black Holes?, Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L18 (2024), arXiv:2404.19010 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Maiolinoet al., JWST meets Chandra: a large popu- lation of Compton thick, feedback-free, and intrinsically X-ray weak AGN, with a sprinkle of SNe, Mon

    R. Maiolinoet al., JWST meets Chandra: a large popu- lation of Compton thick, feedback-free, and intrinsically X-ray weak AGN, with a sprinkle of SNe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.538, 1921 (2025), arXiv:2405.00504 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 1921

  29. [29]

    Lemoine and E

    M. Lemoine and E. Waxman, Anisotropy vs chemi- cal composition at ultra-high energies, JCAP11, 009, arXiv:0907.1354 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang

    R. Maiolinoet al., A black hole in a near-pristine galaxy 700 million years after the Big Bang, arXiv e-prints 10.1093/mnras/staf2109 (2025), arXiv:2505.22567 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2109 2025

  31. [31]

    Inayoshi, Little Red Dots as the Very First Activity of Black Hole Growth, Astrophys

    K. Inayoshi, Little Red Dots as the Very First Activity of Black Hole Growth, Astrophys. J. Lett.988, L22 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Fenu (Pierre Auger), The cosmic ray energy spec- trum measured using the Pierre Auger Observatory, PoS ICRC2017, 486 (2018)

    F. Fenu (Pierre Auger), The cosmic ray energy spec- trum measured using the Pierre Auger Observatory, PoS ICRC2017, 486 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    Berezinsky and G

    V. Berezinsky and G. Zatsepin, Cosmic rays at ultrahigh- energies (neutrino?), Phys. Lett. B28, 423 (1969)

    1969

  34. [34]

    Yoshida and M

    S. Yoshida and M. Teshima, Energy spectrum of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays with extragalactic origin, Prog. Theor. Phys.89, 833 (1993)

    1993

  35. [35]

    Engel, D

    R. Engel, D. Seckel, and T. Stanev, Neutrinos from prop- agation of ultrahigh-energy protons, Phys. Rev. D64, 093010 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101216

    work page arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    Ahlers, L

    M. Ahlers, L. Anchordoqui, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, F. Halzen, and S. Sarkar, GZK Neutrinos after the Fermi- LAT Diffuse Photon Flux Measurement, Astropart. Phys.34, 106 (2010), arXiv:1005.2620 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Kotera, D

    K. Kotera, D. Allard, and A. Olinto, Cosmogenic Neutri- nos: parameter space and detectabilty from PeV to ZeV, JCAP10, 013, arXiv:1009.1382 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Decerprit and D

    G. Decerprit and D. Allard, Constraints on the origin of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays from cosmogenic neutri- nos and photons, Astron. Astrophys.535, A66 (2011), arXiv:1107.3722 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Yoshida and A

    S. Yoshida and A. Ishihara, Constraints on the origin of the ultra-high energy cosmic-rays using cosmic diffuse neutrino flux limits: An analytical approach, Phys. Rev. 6 D85, 063002 (2012), arXiv:1202.3522 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    Aloisio, D

    R. Aloisio, D. Boncioli, A. di Matteo, A. F. Grillo, S. Petrera, and F. Salamida, Cosmogenic neutrinos and ultra-high energy cosmic ray models, JCAP10, 006, arXiv:1505.04020 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    R. Alves Batistaet al.(CRPropa), CRPropa 3.2 — an advanced framework for high-energy particle propaga- tion in extragalactic and galactic spaces, JCAP09, 035, arXiv:2208.00107 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Little Red Dots

    H. B. Akinset al., COSMOS-Web: The Overabundance and Physical Nature of “Little Red Dots”—Implications for Early Galaxy and SMBH Assembly, Astrophys. J. 991, 37 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Kokorevet al., A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4<z<9 in JWST Blank Fields, Astrophys

    V. Kokorevet al., A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4<z<9 in JWST Blank Fields, Astrophys. J.968, 38 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    R. P. Naiduet al., A ”Black Hole Star” Reveals the Re- markable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2503.16596 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    V. Rusakovet al., Little red dots as young supermassive black holes in dense ionized cocoons, Nature649, 574 (2026), arXiv:2503.16595 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    R. Kuze, K. Ioka, K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, and K. Inayoshi, Little Red Dots as Hidden Neu- trino Sources, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.2601.11203 (2026), arXiv:2601.11203 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11203 2026

  47. [47]

    C. M. Caseyet al., An Upper Limit of 106 M⊙in Dust from ALMA Observations in 60 Little Red Dots, Astro- phys. J. Lett.990, L61 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    M. Tanget al., SPURS: Evidence for Clumpy Neu- tral Envelopes and Ionized IGM Surrounding Little Red Dots in Abell 2744 from Ultra-Deep Rest-UV Spectroscopy, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.03563 (2026), arXiv:2604.03563 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    X. Jiet al., Holes in the BH ⋆? AGN signatures in the FUV spectrum of a black-hole dominated Little Red Dot atz= 7.04, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2604.03370 (2026), arXiv:2604.03370 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    C. D. Dermer, K. Murase, and Y. Inoue, Photopion Production in Black-Hole Jets and Flat-Spectrum Ra- dio Quasars as PeV Neutrino Sources, JHEAp3-4, 29 (2014), arXiv:1406.2633 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    S. S. Kimura and K. Toma, Hadronic High-energy Emis- sion from Magnetically Arrested Disks in Radio Galaxies, Astrophys. J.905, 178 (2020), arXiv:2003.13173 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    S. S. Kimura, K. Murase, and P. M´ esz´ aros, Soft gamma rays from low accreting supermassive black holes and connection to energetic neutrinos, Nature Commun.12, 5615 (2021), arXiv:2005.01934 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Yoshida and K

    S. Yoshida and K. Murase, Constraining photohadronic scenarios for the unified origin of IceCube neutrinos and ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. D102, 083023 (2020), arXiv:2007.09276 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Diffuse Neutrino Intensity from the Inner Jets of Active Galactic Nuclei: Impacts of External Photon Fields and the Blazar Sequence

    K. Murase, Y. Inoue, and C. D. Dermer, Diffuse Neutrino Intensity from the Inner Jets of Active Galactic Nuclei: Impacts of External Photon Fields and the Blazar Se- quence, Phys. Rev. D90, 023007 (2014), arXiv:1403.4089 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Padovani, M

    P. Padovani, M. Petropoulou, P. Giommi, and E. Resconi, A simplified view of blazars: the neutrino background, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452, 1877 (2015), arXiv:1506.09135 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Yoshida, K

    S. Yoshida, K. Murase, M. Tanaka, N. Shimizu, and A. Ishihara, Identifying High-energy Neutrino Transients by Neutrino Multiplet-triggered Follow-ups, Astrophys. J.937, 108 (2022), arXiv:2206.13719 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Yoshida and K

    S. Yoshida and K. Murase, Testing unified models for the origin of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays and neutri- nos: Multimessenger approaches with x-ray observations, Phys. Rev. D110, 043045 (2024), arXiv:2406.10944 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Yoshida and H

    S. Yoshida and H. Takami, Bounds on the origin of extra- galactic ultrahigh energy cosmic rays from the IceCube neutrino observations, Phys. Rev. D90, 123012 (2014), arXiv:1409.2950 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    M¨ ucke, R

    A. Mucke, R. Engel, J. P. Rachen, R. J. Protheroe, and T. Stanev, SOPHIA: Monte Carlo simulations of photo- hadronic processes in astrophysics, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.124, 290 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9903478. End Matter The rapid energy cooling of protons due to the dense CMB field in a high-redshift universe enables the appli- cation of the modeling of ne...

    work page arXiv 2000