pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14620 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Inflaton Regeneration via Scalar Couplings: Generic Models and the Higgs Portal

Kunio Kaneta, Natsumi Watanabe, Tomo Takahashi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 11:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords inflaton regenerationmonomial potentialvanishing massHiggs portalreheatingdark matterbig bang nucleosynthesis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inflaton can be regenerated from the thermal plasma long after reheating in monomial potential models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard cosmology assumes the inflaton field becomes negligible after reheating the universe. For models where the potential is a monomial V(φ) ∝ φ^k with k at least 4 near the minimum, the effective mass of the inflaton vanishes as the universe expands. This makes the inflaton accessible to the hot plasma, allowing it to be produced again through particle decays and scatterings. The mechanism is generic and can lead to the inflaton being dark matter or place constraints on reheating couplings. When reheating happens through the Higgs portal, observations from nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, and particle colliders can further test it.

Core claim

The standard assumption that the inflaton becomes dynamically negligible after reheating fails in models with monomial potentials V(φ) ∝ φ^k (k ≥ 4), because the effective mass depends on the field amplitude and vanishes asymptotically with expansion, rendering the inflaton kinematically accessible to the thermal plasma and facilitating its regeneration through 1-to-2 decays and 2-to-2 scatterings of bath particles.

What carries the argument

The vanishing-mass mechanism, in which the effective inflaton mass from the monomial potential goes to zero as the amplitude decreases with expansion, allowing continued production from the bath.

If this is right

  • The coupling responsible for reheating can be constrained if the inflaton is overproduced.
  • The inflaton quanta can constitute dark matter in specific scenarios.
  • If reheating occurs via the Standard Model Higgs portal, the process can be constrained by big bang nucleosynthesis, cosmic microwave background, and colliders such as the LHC.
  • This mechanism provides a new framework for probing post-inflationary reheating.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could change how we calculate the thermal history and relic densities in the early universe.
  • Similar vanishing mass effects might occur for other scalar fields in particle physics models.
  • Future precision cosmology and collider experiments could search for indirect signs of such regeneration.

Load-bearing premise

The inflaton potential takes a monomial form V(φ) ∝ φ^k with k ≥ 4 around its minimum, causing the effective mass to vanish asymptotically with expansion.

What would settle it

Cosmological observations or collider experiments that rule out the predicted rates of inflaton regeneration for the couplings consistent with reheating in these monomial models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14620 by Kunio Kaneta, Natsumi Watanabe, Tomo Takahashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The value of N∗ as a function of µ (left) or σ (right) consistent with observations. Dark and light blue regions correspond to 68% CL and 95% CL allowed range of ns from the combined data [36] of Planck [17], SPT [31], ACT [37], and BICEP/Keck [18]. Reheating with k = 2 is possible for the µ-coupling case, while it is not for the σ-coupling case. Therefore, the black solid line (k = 2) appears only in the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reheating prediction mapped onto the ns–r plane for the cases where the reheating is realized via µ-couping (left) and σ-coupling (right). Observational constraints from Planck+BK and SPT (Planck+SPT+ACT)+BK are also shown. The case of k = 4 corresponds to the black dot in both panels since N∗ is almost independent from couplings as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Reheating temperature achieved by perturbative decay via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reheating temperature achieved by the coexisting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Diagrams of scattering processes. The top-left is the contact interaction, and the top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of Y as a function of mφ/T (left panel) and mχ/T (right panel), respectively, for the case of µ = 0, mχ = 100 GeV and v = 10 TeV. The solid lines correspond to different values of σ with Yini = 0. The black dashed line in the left panel represents the UFO scenario. The black dotted line shows the equilibrium yield Yeq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relic abundance of φ as a function of σ when fixing µ = 0 in the generic scalar case for mχ = 100 GeV and v = 1 TeV. The FIMP regime is depicted in green, and the other parameter space (σ ≳ 10−4 ) is the WIMP regime where the resonant production dominates in the pink region, the forbidden channel determines the abundance in the blue region, and the regular scattering process (φφ → χχ) becomes efficient in … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relic abundance of φ interacting with a generic scalar χ. The solid, dot-dashed, and dashed lines correspond to the cases for different values of mχ and v as shown in the figure. Regions between two lines for each type are excluded due the overproduction of φ. The shaded gray regions are disfavored due to the reheating temperature lower than 10 MeV (BBN bound) with the fragmentation effect. 18 [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Diagrams of vector scattering (W+W−/ZZ → h → φφ) and fermion scattering (f ¯f → h → φφ) in the Higgs portal scenario. The production of inflaton particles proceeds through the decay of the Higgs boson (h → φφ) and 2-to-2 scattering processes involving the Higgs and weak gauge bosons (hh → φφ, WW/ZZ → φφ). The diagrams of hh → φφ are the same as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Relic abundance of φ as a function of σ when fixing µ = 0 in the Higgs portal scenario. Gray shaded region is excluded by the invisible Higgs decay measurement, which includes the WIMP DM case. freeze-in mechanism determines its final abundance. For 2 × 10−7 ≲ σ ≲ 2 × 10−5 , the slope of the black solid line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Various constraints on the Higgs portal scenario and the survival corridor. The gray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Branching ratio of inflaton decay through the mixing with the SM Higgs boson. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The standard cosmological paradigm assumes that the inflaton field becomes dynamically negligible during the post-reheating evolution of the Universe. We demonstrate that this assumption fails for a broad class of inflationary models where the potential behaves as a monomial form $V(\phi) \propto \phi^k$ (with $k \ge 4$) around the minimum. In such scenarios, the effective inflaton mass depends on the field amplitude and vanishes asymptotically as the Universe expands. This vanishing-mass mechanism renders the inflaton kinematically accessible to the thermal plasma long after reheating, facilitating the regeneration of inflaton quanta through 1-to-2 decays and 2-to-2 scatterings of bath particles. This mechanism is quite generic and the coupling responsible for reheating can be constrained if the inflaton is overproduced, while the inflaton quanta can constitute dark matter in specific scenarios. Furthermore, if reheating occurs via the Standard Model Higgs portal, the process can be further constrained by big bang nucleosynthesis, cosmic microwave background, and colliders such as the LHC. This mechanism provides a new framework for probing post-inflationary reheating.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the standard assumption of the inflaton becoming dynamically negligible after reheating fails for inflationary models with monomial potentials V(φ) ∝ φ^k (k ≥ 4) near the minimum. In these cases the effective mass m_eff² = V''(φ) vanishes asymptotically as the field amplitude redshifts, rendering the inflaton kinematically accessible to the thermal bath and allowing regeneration via 1-to-2 decays and 2-to-2 scatterings. The authors argue this is generic, can overproduce the inflaton (constraining the reheating coupling) or allow it to constitute dark matter, and yields further bounds from BBN, CMB and LHC when reheating proceeds through the Higgs portal.

Significance. If the mechanism holds under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a new framework for constraining post-inflationary reheating and inflaton–SM couplings through cosmological and collider data, while opening the possibility that the inflaton itself is a viable dark-matter candidate. It directly challenges the conventional picture of inflaton dilution and could be tested with existing and near-future observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and the section defining the potential] The central claim rests on the potential taking the exact monomial form V(φ) ∝ φ^k (k ≥ 4) around the minimum with no lower-order operators. The manuscript does not supply a symmetry argument or UV-completion argument that would forbid the generic quadratic term m²φ²/2, which would dominate at small amplitudes, drive m_eff to a nonzero constant, and terminate kinematic accessibility once m > T. This assumption is load-bearing for the vanishing-mass mechanism and the late-time regeneration.
  2. [The mechanism section (following the potential definition)] The abstract asserts a demonstration of regeneration through 1-to-2 and 2-to-2 processes long after reheating, yet the text provides neither explicit expressions for the thermally averaged rates nor quantitative estimates of the resulting abundance as a function of the coupling and temperature. Without these, the claim that regeneration remains efficient at late times cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the effective mass and the precise definition of the monomial regime should be introduced with an equation number at first use to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense while incorporating necessary clarifications and additions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction and the section defining the potential] The central claim rests on the potential taking the exact monomial form V(φ) ∝ φ^k (k ≥ 4) around the minimum with no lower-order operators. The manuscript does not supply a symmetry argument or UV-completion argument that would forbid the generic quadratic term m²φ²/2, which would dominate at small amplitudes, drive m_eff to a nonzero constant, and terminate kinematic accessibility once m > T. This assumption is load-bearing for the vanishing-mass mechanism and the late-time regeneration.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of a lower-order quadratic term requires justification, as it is central to the mechanism. The manuscript presents the monomial form as applicable to a broad class of models, but to strengthen this, the revised version will add a discussion in the introduction and potential section on how discrete symmetries (e.g., Z_k with k≥4) or UV completions from supergravity/string theory can forbid or suppress the m²φ² term at the relevant scales. We will also clarify that the regeneration applies whenever the φ^k term dominates the effective potential near the minimum during the post-reheating epoch. This is a partial revision, as the core claim is unchanged but now better supported. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [The mechanism section (following the potential definition)] The abstract asserts a demonstration of regeneration through 1-to-2 and 2-to-2 processes long after reheating, yet the text provides neither explicit expressions for the thermally averaged rates nor quantitative estimates of the resulting abundance as a function of the coupling and temperature. Without these, the claim that regeneration remains efficient at late times cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original text relies on qualitative descriptions and order-of-magnitude arguments for the 1-to-2 and 2-to-2 processes without full explicit formulas. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the mechanism section to include the explicit thermally averaged decay and scattering rates (derived from the relevant matrix elements and phase space integrals), the associated Boltzmann equations, and quantitative estimates of the regenerated inflaton abundance as a function of coupling and temperature. This will rigorously demonstrate the late-time efficiency under the stated assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain; mechanism follows directly from stated monomial potential.

full rationale

The paper takes as input the assumption that the inflaton potential is exactly monomial V(φ) ∝ φ^k (k ≥ 4) near the minimum, with no lower-order terms. From this, the effective mass follows as m_eff² = V''(φ) ∝ φ^{k-2}, which vanishes as the amplitude redshifts to zero. Kinematic accessibility and regeneration via 1→2 and 2→2 processes are then standard consequences of thermal interactions with a massless or light scalar. No equation reduces to a self-definition, no parameter is fitted and relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step relies on self-citation or an imported uniqueness theorem. The derivation is self-contained field theory applied to the given potential shape. The skeptic's concern about quadratic operators is a question of model-building assumptions and UV protection, not a circularity in the paper's internal logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of monomial potentials with k≥4 and standard thermal-bath interactions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Inflaton potential is monomial V(φ) ∝ φ^k with k ≥ 4 near the minimum.
    This form produces the amplitude-dependent mass that vanishes with expansion.
  • domain assumption Reheating proceeds via scalar couplings allowing 1-to-2 and 2-to-2 processes with the thermal plasma.
    Required for the regeneration channels described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1438 out tokens · 61456 ms · 2026-05-10T11:28:17.520236+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347–356

    1981

  2. [2]

    First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe,

    K. Sato, “First-order phase transition of a vacuum and the expansion of the Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195no. 3, (1981) 467–479

    1981

  3. [3]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,”Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389–393

    1982

  4. [4]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,”Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220–1223

    1982

  5. [5]

    Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1882–1905

    1980

  6. [6]

    Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, “Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,” JETP Lett.33(1981) 532–535

    1981

  7. [7]

    The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

    1982

  8. [8]

    Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner, “Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 679

    1983

  9. [9]

    Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology,

    L. F. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. B. Wise, “Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology,”Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 29

    1982

  10. [10]

    Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe,

    A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, “Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B 116(1982) 329

    1982

  11. [11]

    Reheating an Inflationary Universe,

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, “Reheating an Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1437

    1982

  12. [12]

    The origin of chemical elements,

    R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe, and G. Gamow, “The origin of chemical elements,”Phys. Rev.73 (1948) 803–804

    1948

  13. [13]

    Evolution of the Universe,

    R. A. Alpher and R. Herman, “Evolution of the Universe,”Nature162no. 4124, (1948) 774–775

    1948

  14. [14]

    On the Synthesis of elements at very high temperatures,

    R. V. Wagoner, W. A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle, “On the Synthesis of elements at very high temperatures,”Astrophys. J.148(1967) 3–49

    1967

  15. [15]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis Redux,

    T. P. Walker, G. Steigman, D. N. Schramm, K. A. Olive, and H.-S. Kang, “Primordial Nucleosynthesis Redux,”Astrophys. J.376(1991) 51–69

    1991

  16. [16]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    A. D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation,”Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177–181. [17]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akramiet al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10,arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]. [18]BICEP, KeckCollaboration, P. A. R. Adeet al., “Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICE...

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1983

  17. [17]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

    1980

  18. [18]

    The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,” Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703–706,arXiv:0710.3755 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,”JHEP11 (2013) 198,arXiv:1311.0472 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,”JCAP07(2013) 002, arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Universality classes of inflation,

    D. Roest, “Universality classes of inflation,”JCAP01(2014) 007,arXiv:1309.1285 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Large field inflation and doubleα-attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Large field inflation and doubleα-attractors,”JHEP 08(2014) 052,arXiv:1405.3646 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe,

    M. S. Turner, “Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe,”Phys. Rev. D 28(1983) 1243

    1983

  24. [24]

    Garcia, K

    M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,”JCAP04(2021) 012,arXiv:2012.10756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Post-Reheating Inflaton Production as a Probe of Reheating Dynamics,

    K. Kaneta, T. Takahashi, and N. Watanabe, “Post-Reheating Inflaton Production as a Probe of Reheating Dynamics,”arXiv:2508.20402 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Garcia, M

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Gross, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, M. Pierre, and J.-H. Yoon, “Effects of fragmentation on post-inflationary reheating,”JCAP12(2023) 028,arXiv:2308.16231 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Non-minimal Inflationary Attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Superconformal Inflationary Attractors,”JHEP11 (2013) 198,arXiv:1307.7938 [hep-th]. [30]Atacama Cosmology TelescopeCollaboration, E. Calabreseet al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models,”JCAP11(2025) 063,arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]. [31]SPT-3GCollaboration, E. Camphuiset...

    work page arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Calculations of Inflaton Decays and Reheating: with Applications to No-Scale Inflation Models,

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “Calculations of Inflaton Decays and Reheating: with Applications to No-Scale Inflation Models,”JCAP07(2015) 050,arXiv:1505.06986 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Liddle and S.M

    A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, “How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103503,arXiv:astro-ph/0305263

    work page arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, “Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition,” Phys. Dark Univ.5-6(2014) 75–235,arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]. [35]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,”Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6,arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]. 43

    work page arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,

    L. Balkenholet al., “Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,”arXiv:2512.10613 [astro-ph.CO]. [37]Atacama Cosmology TelescopeCollaboration, T. Louiset al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters,”JCAP11 (2025) 062,arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data,

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data,” (10,

  33. [33]

    ,arXiv:2510.18656 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145–179

    1991

  35. [35]

    Henrich, Y

    S. E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Ultrarelativistic Freeze-Out: A Bridge from WIMPs to FIMPs,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 22, (2025) 221002,arXiv:2511.02117 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Z’ portal dark matter from post-inflationary reheating: WIMPs, FIMPs, and UFOs,

    S. E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Z’ portal dark matter from post-inflationary reheating: WIMPs, FIMPs, and UFOs,”arXiv:2512.04229 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating,

    S. E. Henrich, M. Gross, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Ultrarelativistic freeze-out during reheating,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 103538,arXiv:2505.04703 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Can the Inflaton Also Be a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle?,

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, A. J. Long, and S. D. Mcdermott, “Can the Inflaton Also Be a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122no. 9, (2019) 091802, arXiv:1807.03308 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    On the Realization of WIMPflation,

    M. A. G. Garcia, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “On the Realization of WIMPflation,”JCAP10(2021) 061,arXiv:2107.07472 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, “Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,”Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3191–3203

    1991

  41. [41]

    Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels,

    R. T. D’Agnolo and J. T. Ruderman, “Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115no. 6, (2015) 061301,arXiv:1505.07107 [hep-ph]. [47]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aadet al., “Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,”Phys. Lett. ...

    work page arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Djouadi, The anatomy of Electro weak symmetry breaking I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys

    A. Djouadi, “The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,”Phys. Rept.457(2008) 1–216,arXiv:hep-ph/0503172

    work page arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson,

    M. W. Winkler, “Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson,” Phys. Rev. D99no. 1, (2019) 015018,arXiv:1809.01876 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and Hadronic Decay of Long-Lived Massive Particles

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, “Big-Bang nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of long-lived massive particles,”Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 083502,arXiv:astro-ph/0408426

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, T. Moroi, and Y. Takaesu, “Revisiting Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis Constraints on Long-Lived Decaying Particles,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 2, (2018) 023502, arXiv:1709.01211 [hep-ph]. 44

    work page arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Thermalization and spectral distortions of the cosmic background radiation,

    W. Hu and J. Silk, “Thermalization and spectral distortions of the cosmic background radiation,”Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 485–502

    1993

  47. [47]

    Chluba and R

    J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev, “The evolution of CMB spectral distortions in the early Universe,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.419(2012) 1294–1314,arXiv:1109.6552 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2012

  48. [48]

    Slatyer and Chih-Liang Wu,General Constraints on Dark Matter Decay from the Cosmic Microwave Background,Phys

    T. R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu, “General Constraints on Dark Matter Decay from the Cosmic Microwave Background,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 2, (2017) 023010,arXiv:1610.06933 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements,

    J. Cang, Y. Gao, and Y.-Z. Ma, “Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 10, (2020) 103005,arXiv:2002.03380 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Arcadi, A

    G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, “Dark Matter through the Higgs portal,”Phys. Rept. 842(2020) 1–180,arXiv:1903.03616 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Dark Higgs bosons at colliders,

    T. Ferber, A. Grohsjean, and F. Kahlhoefer, “Dark Higgs bosons at colliders,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.136(2024) 104105,arXiv:2305.16169 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Escudero Abenza and T

    M. Escudero Abenza and T. Hambye, “The simplest dark matter model at the edge of perturbativity,”Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139696,arXiv:2505.02408 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Giovannini, Phys

    M. Giovannini, “Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 083504,arXiv:hep-ph/9806329

    work page arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    Peebles and A

    P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, “Quintessential inflation,”Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 063505, arXiv:astro-ph/9810509. [62]LHC Higgs Cross Section Working GroupCollaboration, D. de Florianet al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector,” CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.2(2017) 1–869,arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]. 45

    work page arXiv 1999