Rare and very rare decays at the LHCb experiment

Hanae Tilquin (on behalf of the LHCb collaboration)

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords rare decaysb-hadronstau leptonslepton flavor violationLHCbbranching fraction limitsnew physics searches

0 comments

The pith

LHCb sets the most stringent limits to date on rare decays of b-hadrons and tau leptons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents results from recent searches at the LHCb experiment for very rare decays involving third-generation particles. These include first searches and improved upper limits on modes such as b to s tau tau, b to s tau e, b to s mu e, tau to three muons, and lepton-number-violating processes. A sympathetic reader would care because these decays have branching fractions far below current detector sensitivity in the Standard Model but can be enhanced by new physics at energy scales well above those reachable by direct production at colliders.

Core claim

Searches for b → s τ⁺τ⁻, b → s τ±e∓, b → s μ±e∓, and τ⁻ → μ⁻μ⁺μ⁻ are presented, alongside searches for lepton-number-violating processes and loop-suppressed annihilation decays, setting the most stringent limits to date.

What carries the argument

LHCb detector data analysis to reconstruct candidate events for specific rare decay channels while subtracting backgrounds and applying efficiency corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The reported limits rest on the assumption that detector efficiencies, background estimates, and systematic uncertainties are modeled accurately from simulation and control samples.

What would settle it

An independent reanalysis of the same data that finds a significantly different background level or efficiency value, pushing any branching-fraction limit above the reported value.

read the original abstract

Rare and very rare decays of third-generation particles, including $b$-hadrons and $\tau$ leptons, provide sensitive probes of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). Unlike direct searches limited by collider energies, they probe new physics at much higher energy scales. Many of these decays have SM-predicted branching fractions below the sensitivity of current detectors. These proceedings report on recent LHCb searches, including several first searches and results setting the most stringent limits to date. In particular, searches for $b \to s \tau^+\tau^-$, $b \to s \tau^\pm e^\mp$, $b \to s \mu^\pm e^\mp$, and $\tau^- \to \mu^-\mu^+\mu^-$ are presented, alongside searches for lepton-number-violating processes and loop-suppressed annihilation decays.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a standard LHCb proceedings summary that collects recent rare decay searches and updated limits, but offers no analysis details so the claims rest on the referenced full papers.

read the letter

This LHCb proceedings note pulls together recent searches for rare b-hadron and tau decays. The main points are first-time searches and the tightest limits so far on b to s tau+ tau-, b to s tau e, b to s mu e, tau to three muons, plus some lepton-number-violating modes. These results come from recent LHCb data and tighten constraints on flavor-changing processes that could signal new physics at high scales. The paper does a reasonable job of explaining why these channels matter and listing the new bounds in one place, which saves time if you want a quick status update on the experimental program. Because it is written on behalf of the collaboration, the individual analyses have already passed internal review, and the stress-test note confirms there are no obvious internal contradictions or unstated assumptions that would undermine the headline claims once the cited papers are checked. The main limitation is that this is a short summary with no description of background modeling, efficiency calculations, or systematic uncertainties. You cannot judge the robustness of the limits from this text alone; the strength of the work lives in the full analyses it references. That is normal for conference proceedings, but it does mean the document is not self-contained. This is useful for flavor physicists or BSM model builders who need the current experimental numbers in one spot. A reading group focused on experimental constraints would get value from skimming it, though the technical discussion would have to move to the original papers. I would not cite this note itself; the primary results belong in the detailed publications. The underlying measurements are important enough that a serious editor should send the full analyses to peer review, even if this particular write-up is mainly an overview.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a concise proceedings summary of recent LHCb searches for rare and very rare decays involving b-hadrons and tau leptons. It highlights first-time searches and updated results for channels including b → s τ⁺τ⁻, b → s τ±e∓, b → s μ±e∓, τ⁻ → μ⁻μ⁺μ⁻, lepton-number-violating processes, and loop-suppressed annihilation decays, reporting that several set the most stringent limits to date based on LHC collision data.

Significance. If the referenced full analyses hold, these results meaningfully tighten experimental constraints on beyond-Standard-Model contributions at high energy scales through flavor-changing neutral currents and lepton-flavor violation. The paper's value lies in consolidating multiple LHCb channels into a single overview, providing the community with an accessible update on current experimental reach; credit is due for grounding claims in data-driven LHCb measurements rather than theoretical derivations.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the repeated claim of 'most stringent limits to date' would be strengthened by a brief table or inline numerical comparison to previous bounds (e.g., from BaBar or Belle) even in a proceedings format, to allow readers to assess the improvement without consulting every reference.
[Full text (assumed structure)] The manuscript references individual full analyses but does not list them explicitly in a dedicated references section or footnote; adding a short enumerated list of the primary LHCb papers for each channel would improve traceability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our proceedings contribution and for recommending minor revision. The assessment correctly identifies the paper's role in consolidating recent LHCb results on rare b-hadron and tau decays, including first searches and the most stringent limits to date.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental data report with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is a proceedings summary of LHCb experimental searches for rare decays, reporting limits from collision data analyses. No equations, first-principles derivations, predictions, or ansatzes are present that could reduce to inputs by construction. Claims of 'most stringent limits' rest on referenced full analyses and detector data rather than self-referential fits or self-citations. The paper is self-contained as an experimental report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental paper reporting search results from LHCb data; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the theoretical sense from the abstract. Background modeling and efficiency corrections are implicit but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1183 out tokens · 64182 ms · 2026-05-10T09:28:59.025274+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

, title = "

A. Augusto Alves, Jr. et al.JINST, 3:S08005, 2008. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08005

work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08005 2008
[3]

Breiman, J

L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone.Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth international group, Belmont, California, USA, 1984

1984
[4]

Schapire

Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire.J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 55:119, 1997. doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504

work page doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 1997
[5]

A. L. Read.J. Phys., G28:2693, 2002. doi:110.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

2002
[6]

Capdevila, A

B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, and J. Matias.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(18):181802, 2018. arXiv:1712.01919, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.181802

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.181802 2018
[7]

Banerjee et al.Phys

S. Banerjee et al.Phys. Rev., D113:012008, 2026. arXiv:2411.18639, doi:10.1103/x87q- tld5

work page doi:10.1103/x87q- 2026
[8]

Aaij et al

R. Aaij et al. 2025. arXiv:2510.13716

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[9]

K. S. Cranmer.Comput. Phys. Commun., 136:198–207, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0010- 4655(00)00243-5

work page doi:10.1016/s0010- 2001
[10]

Adachi et al.Phys

I. Adachi et al.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(15):151801, 2025. arXiv:2504.10042, doi:10.1103/v1q3-9dy8

work page doi:10.1103/v1q3-9dy8 2025
[11]

Adachiet al

M. Abumusabh et al. 2026. arXiv:2603.24437

work page arXiv 2026
[12]

Duraisamy, S

M. Duraisamy, S. Sahoo, and R. Mohanta.Phys. Rev. D, 95(3):035022, 2017. arXiv:1610.00902, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.035022

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.035022 2017
[13]

Aaij et al.JHEP, 11:172, 2025

R. Aaij et al.JHEP, 11:172, 2025. arXiv:2506.15347, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)172

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)172 2025
[14]

Watanuki et al.Phys

S. Watanuki et al.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(26):261802, 2023. arXiv:2212.04128, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261802

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.261802 2023
[15]

Adachi et al.JHEP, 08:184, 2025

I. Adachi et al.JHEP, 08:184, 2025. arXiv:2505.08418, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2025)184

work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2025)184 2025
[16]

Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays $B^+ \to \pi^+ \mu^\pm e^\mp$

R. Aaij et al. 2026. arXiv:2604.08396

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[17]

Aubert et al.Phys

B. Aubert et al.Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:051801, 2007. arXiv:hep-ex/0703018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.051801

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.051801 2007
[18]

Blackstone, M

P. Blackstone, M. Fael, and E. Passemar.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(6):506, 2020. arXiv:1912.09862, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8059-7

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8059-7 2020
[19]

Cvetic, C

G. Cvetic, C. Dib, C. S. Kim, and J. D. Kim.Phys. Rev. D, 66:034008, 2002. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 68, 059901 (2003)] arXiv:hep-ph/0202212, doi:110.1103/PhysRevD.66.034008

work page arXiv 2002
[20]

C. Yue, Y. Zhang, and L. Liu.Phys. Lett. B, 547:252–256, 2002. arXiv:hep-ph/0209291, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02781-8

work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02781-8 2002
[21]

Aaij et al

R. Aaij et al. 2026. arXiv:2601.20785

work page arXiv 2026
[22]

Adachi et al.JHEP, 09:062, 2024

I. Adachi et al.JHEP, 09:062, 2024. arXiv:2405.07386, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)062

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)062 2024
[23]

Cvetic, Claudio Dib, Sin Kyu Kang, and C

G. Cvetic, Claudio Dib, Sin Kyu Kang, and C. S. Kim.Phys. Rev. D, 82:053010, 2010. arXiv:1005.4282, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.053010

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.053010 2010
[24]

Search for lepton-number-violatingB − → D(∗)+µ−µ− decays,

R. Aaij et al. 2026. arXiv:2601.07657

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

Aaij et al.Phys

R. Aaij et al.Phys. Rev. D, 85:112004, 2012. arXiv:1201.5600, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.112004

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.112004 2012
[26]

Bar-Shalom, G

S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam, and Y. Yang.Phys. Rev. D, 67:014007, 2003. arXiv:hep- ph/0201244, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.014007

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.014007 2003
[27]

Y. Li.Phys. Rev. D, 89(1):014003, 2014. arXiv:1311.2664, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.014003

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.014003 2014
[28]

Aaij et al.JHEP, 12:026, 2025

R. Aaij et al.JHEP, 12:026, 2025. arXiv:2507.20945, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)026

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2025)026 2025
[29]

Aaij et al.JHEP, 12:155, 2019

R. Aaij et al.JHEP, 12:155, 2019. arXiv:1907.10003, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)155

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)155 2019
[30]

Status and prospects of the PandaX-III experiment,

R. Aaij et al.JINST, 19(05):P05065, 2024. arXiv:2305.10515, doi:10.1088/1748- 0221/19/05/P05065

work page doi:10.1088/1748- 2024