arxiv: 2604.15470 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY· eess.SP

Recognition: unknown

Perron-Frobenius Contractive Operator Matching for Data-Driven Reachable Fault Identification and Recovery

Joshua D. Ibrahim , Mahdi Taheri , Soon-Jo Chung , Fred Y. Hadaegh

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SYeess.SP

keywords fault detectionPerron-Frobenius operatorsdensity evolutionWasserstein boundsdata-driven FDIRactuator faultsnonlinear systemsreachable sets

0 comments

The pith

Deterministic Perron-Frobenius operators learned from data produce certifiable 2-Wasserstein bounds between fault-driven and nominal density evolutions for actuator fault detection and recovery.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a data-driven approach to fault detection, identification, and recovery that works in the space of evolving state probability densities instead of single trajectories. It builds fault-indexed Perron-Frobenius operators that exactly reproduce the stochastic marginals of the underlying Fokker-Planck flow and derives explicit 2-Wasserstein bounds on how far fault-affected densities can stray from nominal ones. These bounds directly yield quantitative conditions for when faults can be detected and distinguished. The operators are fitted from trajectory data via flow-map matching, with the matching residual itself serving as a provable error certificate, and a co-trained contraction map supports online fitting of fault parameters even for unseen fault magnitudes before recovery steering is applied through reachable density propagation.

Core claim

The central claim is that deterministic, fault-indexed Perron-Frobenius operators constructed to match exact stochastic marginals define forward reachable density families whose 2-Wasserstein divergence from nominal evolution can be bounded by the observable flow-map-matching residual, thereby supplying certifiable detectability and identifiability conditions for actuator faults while enabling continuous out-of-distribution parameter fitting and density-based recovery control.

What carries the argument

Fault-indexed Perron-Frobenius operators that propagate probability densities forward under different fault profiles, with the flow-map-matching residual serving as a direct 2-Wasserstein error bound and a co-trained contraction certificate controlling the gap to true dynamics.

If this is right

The 2-Wasserstein bounds supply quantitative conditions for fault detectability and identifiability.
The observable flow-map-matching residual directly upper-bounds the operator approximation error in the 2-Wasserstein metric.
The contraction certificate enables continuous fault-parameter fitting over a continuous parameter space without retraining.
Recovery proceeds by propagating reachable density families and applying Gaussian-mixture covariance steering.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same density-divergence bounds could be used to set detection thresholds that remain valid under model mismatch between the learned operators and the true plant.
An operator library built this way might transfer across plants that share similar contraction properties without full re-learning.
Online parameter fitting over continuous fault spaces reduces the need to pre-enumerate every discrete fault mode in advance.

Load-bearing premise

The co-trained contraction certificate sufficiently bounds the gap between the learned operator family, the actual fault-driven density flow, and the nominal dynamics to guarantee reliable generalization and online fault-parameter fitting.

What would settle it

Measure the empirical 2-Wasserstein distance between the operator-predicted fault density and the actual state distribution on validation trajectories with known actuator faults; the certification holds only if this distance never exceeds the bound given by the flow-map-matching residual.

read the original abstract

This paper focuses on data-driven fault detection, identification, and recovery (FDIR) for nonlinear control-affine systems under actuator faults. We create a unified framework in the space of probability densities, rather than on individual trajectories, using fault-indexed Perron--Frobenius (PF) operators to predict the evolution of state distributions under different fault profiles. By leveraging the probability-flow representation of the Fokker--Planck equation, we construct deterministic PF operators that reproduce exact stochastic marginals, define forward reachable density families, and establish certifiable 2-Wasserstein bounds on the divergence between fault-driven and nominal density evolutions. These provide quantitative conditions for the detectability and identifiability of various faults. The fault-indexed operators are learned from trajectory data via flow map matching (FMM), and we demonstrate that the observable FMM residual directly bounds the approximation error of the operator in the 2-Wasserstein metric. Additionally, we co-train a contraction certificate that bounds the gap between the learned operator family, the actual fault-driven density flow, and the nominal dynamics. The operator library is then used online for continuous fault parameter fitting over a continuous parameter space to generalize the learned operators to out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. To carry out the recovery control, we employ reachable density propagation and Gaussian mixture covariance steering. The proposed framework is validated on a 10-state spacecraft attitude-control system with four reaction wheels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Density-based PF operator learning with co-trained certificate advances FDIR but needs verification on OOD bounds.

read the letter

This paper's main contribution is a data-driven framework for fault detection, identification, and recovery that operates on probability densities using fault-indexed Perron-Frobenius operators. It learns these operators from trajectory data through flow map matching and pairs them with a co-trained contraction certificate for handling continuous fault parameters. The approach does several things well. Working in density space rather than individual trajectories provides a natural way to handle reachable sets and quantify differences via 2-Wasserstein distance. The claim that the FMM residual directly bounds the operator approximation error is useful for practical implementation. Co-training the certificate to bound gaps for out-of-distribution scenarios allows online continuous fitting, which is a step beyond discrete fault libraries. Applying reachable density propagation and Gaussian mixture covariance steering for recovery ties the detection to control action. The validation on a 10-state spacecraft system with reaction wheel faults demonstrates the method on a relevant nonlinear control-affine example. One area that needs checking is the strength of the contraction certificate. The framework relies on it to ensure the learned operator family stays close to the true fault-driven flows and nominal dynamics across the parameter space. If this holds only under the training conditions and not for true extrapolation, the certifiable detectability and identifiability conditions could weaken in real OOD cases. The abstract mentions deterministic operators that reproduce exact stochastic marginals, so the full derivations should clarify how the probability-flow representation supports the Wasserstein bounds without circularity. This work is aimed at researchers in data-driven control and fault-tolerant systems for safety-critical applications. A reader in aerospace control or nonlinear dynamics would find the unified framework and the example valuable. The paper shows clear thinking on integrating operator learning with certificates and deserves a serious referee to verify the mathematical claims and experimental support. I recommend sending it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a data-driven FDIR framework for nonlinear control-affine systems under actuator faults. It constructs fault-indexed deterministic Perron-Frobenius operators via flow map matching on trajectory data to reproduce stochastic marginals, defines reachable density families, and claims certifiable 2-Wasserstein bounds on fault-driven vs. nominal density divergence for quantitative detectability/identifiability conditions. A co-trained contraction certificate is introduced to bound gaps between the learned operator family, true Fokker-Planck flows, and nominal dynamics, enabling online continuous fault-parameter fitting for OOD generalization; recovery uses reachable density propagation and Gaussian mixture covariance steering. The approach is validated on a 10-state spacecraft attitude-control system.

Significance. If the claimed bounds and certificate properties hold, the work offers a density-space alternative to trajectory-based FDIR with explicit quantitative guarantees via Wasserstein metrics and contraction mappings. This could strengthen robustness analysis for safety-critical nonlinear systems. The spacecraft validation demonstrates scalability to moderate-dimensional dynamics, and the direct use of the observable FMM residual for error bounding is a concrete strength if rigorously established.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and certificate training section] Abstract and the section on co-training the contraction certificate: the central claim that this certificate uniformly bounds the gap between the learned PF operator family, the actual fault-driven density evolution under the Fokker-Planck flow, and the nominal dynamics (for OOD generalization and continuous parameter fitting without post-hoc adjustments) is load-bearing for the detectability/identifiability conditions and recovery guarantees, yet no derivation is supplied showing that the contraction property follows from the PF construction or probability-flow representation, nor are uniform bounds verified over the fault-parameter space.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the major comment on the contraction certificate below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and certificate training section] Abstract and the section on co-training the contraction certificate: the central claim that this certificate uniformly bounds the gap between the learned PF operator family, the actual fault-driven density evolution under the Fokker-Planck flow, and the nominal dynamics (for OOD generalization and continuous parameter fitting without post-hoc adjustments) is load-bearing for the detectability/identifiability conditions and recovery guarantees, yet no derivation is supplied showing that the contraction property follows from the PF construction or probability-flow representation, nor are uniform bounds verified over the fault-parameter space.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not supply an explicit derivation showing how the contraction property follows from the PF construction or probability-flow representation, nor does it verify uniform bounds over the fault-parameter space. The co-training is presented in Section IV as an empirical procedure enforcing a contraction inequality on the learned operators. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the contraction bound rigorously from the deterministic PF operator (via its equivalence to the Fokker-Planck flow) and the Lipschitz properties of the underlying control-affine dynamics. We will also include additional numerical verification of uniform bounds across a discretized fault-parameter grid in the spacecraft validation, confirming the OOD generalization and continuous fitting claims without post-hoc adjustments. These changes will directly support the detectability/identifiability conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper derives deterministic PF operators from the probability-flow representation of the Fokker-Planck equation to reproduce stochastic marginals, defines reachable density families, and establishes 2-Wasserstein bounds on fault vs. nominal divergence using standard metric properties. Operators are learned via FMM on trajectory data with the observable residual shown to bound approximation error (a direct consequence of the matching objective, not a renamed prediction). The co-trained contraction certificate is presented as an additional learned component providing uniform bounds over the fault parameter space for OOD generalization and continuous fitting; this is not shown to reduce to the fitted values by construction but is instead positioned as an independent certificate whose contraction property is verified separately. No self-citations are load-bearing for the core claims, no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The framework relies on externally verifiable elements (Wasserstein metric, Gaussian mixture steering, reachable propagation) outside the fitted parameters, rendering the derivation chain non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only access limits visibility into explicit free parameters or axioms; the framework implicitly relies on the Fokker-Planck representation holding for the control-affine systems and on the existence of learnable deterministic PF operators that match stochastic marginals.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The systems are nonlinear control-affine and admit a probability-flow representation via the Fokker-Planck equation that allows deterministic PF operators to reproduce exact stochastic marginals.
Stated in the abstract as the basis for constructing the operators and reachable density families.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5580 in / 1523 out tokens · 33734 ms · 2026-05-10T10:17:56.370959+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Isermann, Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance

R. Isermann, Fault-diagnosis systems: an introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance . Springer Science & Business Media, 2005

2005
[2]

Onl ine tree- based planning for active spacecraft fault estimation and c ollision avoidance,

J. Ragan, B. Riviere, F. Y . Hadaegh, and S.-J. Chung, “Onl ine tree- based planning for active spacecraft fault estimation and c ollision avoidance,” Science Robotics , vol. 9, no. 93, p. eadn4722, 2024

2024
[3]

Lear ning-based minimally-sensed fault-tolerant adaptive ﬂight control,

M. O’Connell, J. Cho, M. Anderson, and S.-J. Chung, “Lear ning-based minimally-sensed fault-tolerant adaptive ﬂight control, ” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. , vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5198–5205, 2024

2024
[4]

A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part i: Q uantitative model-based methods,

V . V enkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. Yin, and S. N. K avuri, “A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part i: Q uantitative model-based methods,” Comput. Chem. Eng. , vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293– 311, 2003

2003
[5]

Chen and R

J. Chen and R. J. Patton, Robust model-based fault diagnosis for dynamic systems . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 3

2012
[6]

A recurrent neural- network-based sensor and actuator fault detection and isol ation for nonlinear systems with application to the satellite’s atti tude control subsystem,

H. A. Talebi, K. Khorasani, and S. Tafazoli, “A recurrent neural- network-based sensor and actuator fault detection and isol ation for nonlinear systems with application to the satellite’s atti tude control subsystem,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. , vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2008

2008
[7]

Evaluation of fault diag nosability for dynamic systems with unknown uncertainties,

F. Fu, D. Wang, W. Li, and P . Liu, “Evaluation of fault diag nosability for dynamic systems with unknown uncertainties,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 16 737–16 745, 2018

2018
[8]

Data-dri ven fault detection and isolation of nonlinear systems using deep lea rning for koopman operator,

M. Bakhtiaridoust, M. Y adegar, and N. Meskin, “Data-dri ven fault detection and isolation of nonlinear systems using deep lea rning for koopman operator,” ISA transactions, vol. 134, pp. 200–211, 2023

2023
[9]

Data- driven probabilistic fault detection and identiﬁcation vi a density ﬂow matching,

J. D. Ibrahim, M. Taheri, S.-J. Chung, and F. Y . Hadaegh, “ Data- driven probabilistic fault detection and identiﬁcation vi a density ﬂow matching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.25982 , 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[10]

Task-driven out-of -distribution detection with statistical guarantees for robot learning,

A. Farid, S. V eer, and A. Majumdar, “Task-driven out-of -distribution detection with statistical guarantees for robot learning, ” in Conf. Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 970–980

2022
[11]

Learnin g density distribution of reachable states for autonomous sy stems,

Y . Meng, D. Sun, Z. Qiu, M. T. B. Waez, and C. Fan, “Learnin g density distribution of reachable states for autonomous sy stems,” in Conference on Robot Learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 124–136

2022
[12]

Optimal control of the liouville equatio n,

R. Brockett, “Optimal control of the liouville equatio n,” 2007

2007
[13]

Fokker-Planck equation,

H. Risken, “Fokker-Planck equation,” in The F okker-Planck equation: methods of solution and applications . Springer, 1989, pp. 63–95

1989
[14]

A computational ﬂuid mec hanics so- lution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem,

J.-D. Benamou and Y . Brenier, “A computational ﬂuid mec hanics so- lution to the Monge-Kantorovich mass transfer problem,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 375–393, 2000

2000
[15]

Villani, Topics in optimal transportation

C. Villani, Topics in optimal transportation. Amer. Math. Soc., 2021, vol. 58

2021
[16]

Probabilistic reachability of stochas- tic control systems: A contraction-based approach,

S. Jafarpour and Y . Chen, “Probabilistic reachability of stochas- tic control systems: A contraction-based approach,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12225, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Lasota and M

A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey, Chaos, fractals, and noise: stochastic aspects of dynamics . Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, vol. 97

2013
[18]

Probability ﬂow solu tion of the fokker–planck equation,

N. M. Bofﬁ and E. V anden-Eijnden, “Probability ﬂow solu tion of the fokker–planck equation,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology , vol. 4, no. 3, p. 035012, 2023

2023
[19]

Continuity equations and od e ﬂows with non-smooth velocity,

L. Ambrosio and G. Crippa, “Continuity equations and od e ﬂows with non-smooth velocity,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A. , vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 1191–1244, 2014

2014
[20]

On contraction analysis f or nonlinear systems,

W. Lohmiller and J. Slotine, “On contraction analysis f or nonlinear systems,” Automatica, 1998

1998
[21]

Contr action theory for nonlinear stability analysis and learning-based contr ol: A tutorial overview,

H. Tsukamoto, S.-J. Chung, and J.-J. E. Slotine, “Contr action theory for nonlinear stability analysis and learning-based contr ol: A tutorial overview,” Annual Reviews in Control , vol. 52, pp. 135–169, 2021

2021
[22]

Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions

M. S. Albergo, N. M. Bofﬁ, and E. V anden-Eijnden, “Stoch as- tic interpolants: A unifying framework for ﬂows and diffusi ons,” arXiv:2303.08797, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[23]

Building normali zing ﬂows with stochastic interpolants,

M. S. Albergo and E. V anden-Eijnden, “Building normali zing ﬂows with stochastic interpolants,” ICLR, 2023

2023
[24]

Flow map matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07507,

N. M. Bofﬁ, M. S. Albergo, and E. V anden-Eijnden, “Flow m ap matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical fra mework for consistency models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07507 , 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Control contraction m etrics: Convex and intrinsic criteria for nonlinear feedback design,

I. R. Manchester and J. Slotine, “Control contraction m etrics: Convex and intrinsic criteria for nonlinear feedback design,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3046–3053, 2017

2017
[26]

Ghosal and A

S. Ghosal and A. van der V aart, Fundamentals of Nonparametric Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press, 2017

2017
[27]

Review on contract ion analysis and computation of contraction metrics,

P . Giesl, S. Hafstein, and C. Kawan, “Review on contract ion analysis and computation of contraction metrics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.01367, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Geometric mechanics based n onlinear model predictive spacecraft attitude control with reactio n wheels,

D. Y . Lee, R. Gupta, U. V . Kalabi´ c, S. Di Cairano, A. M. Bl och, J. W. Cutler, and I. V . Kolmanovsky, “Geometric mechanics based n onlinear model predictive spacecraft attitude control with reactio n wheels,” J. Guid. Control, Dyn. , vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2017

2017