arxiv: 2604.15820 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Gauge Symmetry

Joao C. Pinto Barros, Marina Krist\'c Marinkovi\'c, Thea Budde

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph

keywords Hilbert space fragmentationemergent gauge symmetrynon-invertible symmetrydipole-conserving spin chainlattice gauge theoryquantum simulationS=1 spin model

0 comments

The pith

A non-gauge-invariant dipole spin chain Hamiltonian exactly simulates gauge theory dynamics inside its fragmented sectors via emergent non-invertible symmetries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the S=1 dipole-conserving spin chain, which fragments into exponentially many dynamically disconnected sectors. Within subsets of these sectors, non-invertible symmetries emerge that function as gauge symmetries, labeling the sectors and constraining the allowed dynamics. Evolving the full Hamiltonian, which lacks global gauge invariance, therefore produces exact gauge-theory evolution restricted to each such sector. A sympathetic reader would care because this removes the need to engineer explicitly gauge-invariant Hamiltonians for quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories. The approach also shows how fragmentation and gauge structure can coexist even when translation invariance is absent.

Core claim

The central claim is that the fragmented Hilbert space of the dipole-conserving S=1 spin chain contains sectors labeled by emergent non-invertible symmetries that act as gauge symmetries valid only inside those subspaces, so that time evolution under the non-gauge-invariant Hamiltonian reproduces the exact dynamics of a gauge theory within each labeled sector.

What carries the argument

Emergent non-invertible symmetries that label exponentially many fragmented sectors and enforce gauge-like constraints only inside those subspaces.

If this is right

Exponentially many sectors of the chain become equivalent to distinct gauge-theory sectors.
Gauge-theory simulations can be performed without enforcing gauge invariance on the full Hamiltonian.
The same fragmentation pattern supplies a natural labeling of sectors that replaces explicit gauge fixing.
Higher-form symmetries of lattice gauge theories appear inside the spin-chain description without additional construction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism may generalize to other dipole-conserving or fragmented spin models, offering a route to embed gauge theories in systems that lack obvious local symmetries.
Experimental platforms that naturally realize dipole conservation could implement gauge-theory dynamics by preparing states inside the relevant fragments rather than by Hamiltonian engineering.
Connections between Hilbert-space fragmentation and the exponentially many sectors of higher-form gauge theories become directly testable in one-dimensional chains.

Load-bearing premise

The non-invertible symmetries are genuinely emergent gauge symmetries that remain valid and correctly label the sectors only inside the fragmented subspaces.

What would settle it

A concrete counterexample would be a sector identified as gauge-symmetric where the time evolution under the Hamiltonian produces states or transitions forbidden by the expected gauge constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15820 by Joao C. Pinto Barros, Marina Krist\'c Marinkovi\'c, Thea Budde.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The real-time dynamics of two product initial states. The Krylov sectors are very small, such that significant oscillations persist even after a long time. Additionally, the system is not evolving into a translation-invariant ensemble, even though the Hamiltonian is translation invariant. ID 𝐺2𝑛 𝐺˜ 2𝑛 𝐺2𝑛+2 Compatible states |𝜎 𝑧 2𝑛𝜎 𝑧 2𝑛+1𝜎 𝑧 2𝑛+2 ⟩ 1 0 -2 0 |−0−⟩ , |+ − −⟩ , |− − +⟩ 2 0 2 0 |+0+⟩ , |+ + … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Left: A sketch of the structure of the 𝑆 = 1/2 dipole conserving spin chain Hamiltonian in the product basis. The blue squares represent the global symmetry sectors. These sectors are split into many more fragments represented in black. Some sectors conserve the identified quantities eq. (4). These sectors are filled in red. Right: States for which all even sites have one of these sets of eigenvalues for e… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The Hamiltonian formulation of lattice gauge theories plays a central role in quantum simulations of gauge theories, and understanding their spectrum and other properties is expected to become crucial in the upcoming years. The relevant Hamiltonians in this framework possess local symmetry at each lattice site and may exhibit higher-form symmetries. There are then an exponentially large number of dynamically disconnected symmetry sectors, most of which are not translation-invariant. An exponential number of dynamically disconnected sectors, i.e., Hilbert space fragmentation, can also occur in systems in which no such symmetries have been identified. In this contribution, we describe an emergent gauge symmetry that is valid only in a subset of sectors of the fragmented $S=1$ dipole-conserving spin chain. These non-invertible symmetries can label exponentially many of the model's sectors. Simulating this Hamiltonian, which is not gauge-invariant, yields an exact quantum simulation of a gauge theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links fragmentation sectors in the S=1 dipole chain to non-invertible symmetries that label them like gauge symmetries, but the claim of exact gauge-theory simulation from a non-invariant Hamiltonian is not fully backed by shown commutation or projection checks.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work identifies non-invertible symmetries emerging inside the fragmented sectors of the S=1 dipole-conserving spin chain. These symmetries label exponentially many sectors and are presented as allowing the original non-gauge-invariant Hamiltonian to act as an exact simulator for a gauge theory within those subspaces. That connection between fragmentation and gauge-like structure is the concrete new piece here, and it is not something the cited prior work on either topic already spelled out for this model. The authors do a solid job laying out how the dipole constraint produces the fragmentation and then showing how the symmetries can be used to organize the sectors. This gives a clear example that could matter for people trying to build quantum simulators for lattice gauge theories, where sector structure and local constraints are central. The writing stays focused on the model and the symmetry operators without unnecessary fluff. The soft spot is the jump to “exact quantum simulation of a gauge theory.” The abstract and stress-test note both indicate that the symmetries are only valid in a subset of sectors, yet there is no explicit demonstration that the Hamiltonian commutes with the symmetry generators inside those sectors or that the time-evolution operator projected onto them preserves the constraints. Without that step, the dynamics could still mix things in ways that break the gauge-like structure, leaving the simulation sector-labeled rather than fully equivalent. The paper would benefit from a short calculation or numerical check confirming [H_eff, G] = 0 for the relevant generators G. This is the sort of thing a referee would ask for right away. The work is aimed at researchers in quantum simulation of gauge theories and in many-body fragmentation. Anyone already looking at dipole chains or non-invertible symmetries will find the concrete mapping useful. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the relevant literature without obvious internal contradictions, so it deserves a serious referee even if the exact-simulation claim needs tightening. I would send it out for review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines the S=1 dipole-conserving spin chain, which exhibits Hilbert space fragmentation into exponentially many sectors. It identifies emergent non-invertible symmetries that function as gauge symmetries but are valid only within a subset of these sectors, where they label the sectors. The central claim is that time evolution generated by the non-gauge-invariant Hamiltonian, when restricted to these symmetry-labeled subspaces, constitutes an exact quantum simulation of a gauge theory.

Significance. If the emergent symmetries are shown to enforce exact gauge invariance within the relevant fragmented sectors, the work establishes a direct link between Hilbert space fragmentation and lattice gauge theory dynamics. This could provide a new route to quantum simulations of gauge theories that avoids explicit gauge-invariant Hamiltonians, with potential implications for understanding constrained dynamics and non-invertible symmetries in many-body systems.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'Simulating this Hamiltonian, which is not gauge-invariant, yields an exact quantum simulation of a gauge theory' is the load-bearing assertion but is not supported by an explicit demonstration that the restricted dynamics preserve the Gauss-law-like constraints. The manuscript must provide a calculation showing that the effective Hamiltonian (or time-evolution operator) in the symmetry-labeled sectors commutes with the non-invertible symmetry generators.
[Model and symmetries] The identification of the non-invertible symmetries and the fragmented sectors: The paper states these symmetries 'are valid only in a subset of sectors' and 'can label exponentially many,' but without an explicit operator definition or verification that [H, symmetry generator] vanishes inside those sectors (as opposed to merely labeling them), the equivalence to gauge-theory dynamics remains unestablished.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the specific form of the dipole-conserving Hamiltonian and the non-invertible symmetry operators to make the claim more self-contained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the central claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested calculations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that 'Simulating this Hamiltonian, which is not gauge-invariant, yields an exact quantum simulation of a gauge theory' is the load-bearing assertion but is not supported by an explicit demonstration that the restricted dynamics preserve the Gauss-law-like constraints. The manuscript must provide a calculation showing that the effective Hamiltonian (or time-evolution operator) in the symmetry-labeled sectors commutes with the non-invertible symmetry generators.

Authors: We agree that the abstract's central claim requires stronger support through explicit verification. The manuscript defines the non-invertible symmetries as operators that label the fragmented sectors arising from dipole conservation, with the Hamiltonian preserving these sectors by construction. In the revised version, we will add a new subsection that explicitly computes the action of the symmetry generators on the relevant subspaces and demonstrates that the time-evolution operator commutes with them when restricted to those sectors. This will directly address the preservation of the Gauss-law-like constraints. revision: yes
Referee: [Model and symmetries] The identification of the non-invertible symmetries and the fragmented sectors: The paper states these symmetries 'are valid only in a subset of sectors' and 'can label exponentially many,' but without an explicit operator definition or verification that [H, symmetry generator] vanishes inside those sectors (as opposed to merely labeling them), the equivalence to gauge-theory dynamics remains unestablished.

Authors: The manuscript constructs the non-invertible symmetry operators explicitly in the section discussing the model's symmetries, showing they are valid only in the subset of sectors where they align with the fragmentation pattern and can label an exponential number of them. Because the Hamiltonian is block-diagonal with respect to these sectors, the dynamics are confined to them. We acknowledge, however, that a direct, restricted commutator calculation [H, G] = 0 inside the sectors would make the gauge-theory equivalence more transparent. We will include this verification, along with any necessary elaboration of the operator definitions, in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper identifies emergent non-invertible symmetries valid only in a subset of sectors of the fragmented S=1 dipole-conserving spin chain and concludes that simulating the explicitly non-gauge-invariant Hamiltonian therefore yields an exact gauge-theory simulation inside those sectors. This conclusion is presented as a direct consequence of the symmetry labeling of the fragmented subspaces rather than a redefinition of the Hamiltonian or a fitted parameter. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that would reduce the central claim to its inputs by construction; the argument remains self-contained on the basis of the symmetry analysis alone.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 967 out tokens · 62044 ms · 2026-05-10T07:42:45.812174+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Gattringer and C.B

C. Gattringer and C.B. Lang,Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice: An Introductory Presentation, vol. 788 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010), 10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3 2010
[2]

title Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03586 arXiv:2509.03586

J.C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papić and Z. Davoudi,Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories,2509.03586

work page arXiv
[3]

Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys

M. Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys. Rev. E50(1994) [cond-mat/9403051]

work page arXiv 1994
[4]

Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis

J.M. Deutsch,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 082001 [1805.01616]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[5]

From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,

L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol,From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,Adv. Phys.65(2016) 239 [1509.06411]

work page arXiv 2016
[6]

Gogolin and J

C. Gogolin and J. Eisert,Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems,Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 056001 [1503.07538]. 8 Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Gauge SymmetryThea Budde

work page arXiv 2016
[7]

Chandran, T

A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani and R. Moessner,Quantum Many-Body Scars: A Quasiparticle Perspective,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 443 [2206.11528]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Moudgalya, B.A

S. Moudgalya, B.A. Bernevig and N. Regnault,Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: areviewofexactresults,Rept.Prog.Phys.85(2022)086501[2109.00548]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

Serbyn, D

M. Serbyn, D.A. Abanin and Z. Papić,Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity,Nature Phys.17(2021) 675 [2011.09486]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

Bluvsteinet al., Controlling quantum many-body dy- namics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science371, 1355 (2021), arXiv:2012.12276 [quant-ph]

D. Bluvstein et al.,Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays,Science371(2021) 1355 [2012.12276]

work page arXiv 2021
[11]

Desaules, A

J.-Y. Desaules, A. Hudomal, D. Banerjee, A. Sen, Z. Papić and J.C. Halimeh,Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger model,Physical Review B107(2023) 205112

2023
[12]

Spectrum-Generating Algebra in Higher Dimensional Gauge Theories

T. Budde, J. Dong, M. Krstić Marinković and J.C. Pinto Barros,Spectrum-Generating Algebra in Higher Dimensional Gauge Theories, in42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, 4, 2026 [2604.05763]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[13]

Ivanov and O.I

A.N. Ivanov and O.I. Motrunich,Many exact area-law scar eigenstates in the nonintegrable PXP and related models,2503.16327

work page arXiv
[14]

Banerjee and A

D. Banerjee and A. Sen,Quantum Scars from Zero Modes in an Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory on Ladders,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 220601 [2012.08540]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Budde, M

T. Budde, M. Krstić Marinković and J.C. Pinto Barros,Quantum many-body scars for arbitrary integer spin in 2+1D Abelian gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 094506 [2403.08892]

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

Moudgalya and O

S. Moudgalya and O.I. Motrunich,Exhaustive Characterization of Quantum Many-Body Scars Using Commutant Algebras,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 041069 [2209.03377]

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Pakrouski, P

K. Pakrouski, P.N. Pallegar, F.K. Popov and I.R. Klebanov,Many Body Scars as a Group Invariant Sector of Hilbert Space,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 230602 [2007.00845]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Sun, F.K

Z. Sun, F.K. Popov, I.R. Klebanov and K. Pakrouski,Majorana scars as group singlets,Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023) 043208 [2212.11914]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Vidmar and M

L. Vidmar and M. Rigol,Generalized gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016(2016) 064007

2016
[20]

Moudgalya, B.A

S. Moudgalya, B.A. Bernevig and N. Regnault,Quantum Many-Body Scars and Hilbert Space Fragmentation: A Review of Exact Results,Rep. Prog. Phys. 85 086501 (2022)(2021)

2022
[21]

P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap and F. Pollmann,Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians,Physical Review X10 (2020) . 9 Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Gauge SymmetryThea Budde

2020
[22]

Moudgalya and O.I

S. Moudgalya and O.I. Motrunich,Hilbert space fragmentation and commutant algebras, Physical Review X12(2022)

2022
[23]

Mukherjee, D

B. Mukherjee, D. Banerjee, K. Sengupta and A. Sen,Minimal model for Hilbert space fragmentation with local constraints,Phys. Rev. B104(2021) 155117 [2106.14897]

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries

T. Budde, M.K. Marinković and J.C. Pinto Barros,Hilbert Space Fragmentation from Generalized Symmetries,2604.12907

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

Ortiz, C

G. Ortiz, C. Giridhar, P. Vojta, A.H. Nevidomskyy and Z. Nussinov,Generalized Wigner theorem for non-invertible symmetries,Phys. Rev. B(2026) [2509.25327]

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

D.Banerjee, M.Dalmonte, M.Müller, E.Rico, P.Stebler, U.-J.Wieseetal.,Atomicquantum simulation of dynamical gauge fields coupled to fermionic matter: From string breaking to evolution after a quench,Physical Review Letters109(2012)

2012
[27]

Horn,Finite matrix models with continuous local gauge invariance,Physics Letters B100 (1981) 149–151

D. Horn,Finite matrix models with continuous local gauge invariance,Physics Letters B100 (1981) 149–151

1981
[28]

Orland and D

P. Orland and D. Rohrlich,Lattice gauge magnets: Local isospin from spin,Nuclear Physics B338(1990) 647

1990
[29]

Quantum Link Models: A Discrete Approach to Gauge Theories

S. Chandrasekharan and U.J. Wiese,Quantum link models: A Discrete approach to gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 455 [hep-lat/9609042]

work page Pith review arXiv 1997
[30]

Brower, S

R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, S. Riederer and U.-J. Wiese,D-theory: field quantization by dimensional reduction of discrete variables,Nuclear Physics B693(2004) 149–175

2004
[31]

E. Rico, T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller and S. Montangero,Tensor Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories and Atomic Quantum Simulation,Physical Review Letters112(2014) 201601

2014
[32]

Pinto Barros, T

J.C. Pinto Barros, T. Budde and M. Krstic Marinkovic,Meron-Cluster Algorithms for Quantum Link Models,PoSLATTICE2023(2024) 024 [2402.01039]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Surace, P.P

F.M. Surace, P.P. Mazza, G. Giudici, A. Lerose, A. Gambassi and M. Dalmonte,Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in rydberg atom quantum simulators,Physical Review X 10(2020)

2020
[34]

Bernien, S

H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler et al.,Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator,Nature551(2017) 579

2017
[35]

Zhou, G.-X

Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J.C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke et al.,Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator,Science377(2022) abl6277 [2107.13563]. 10

work page arXiv 2022