arxiv: 2604.15835 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Recognition: unknown

Rain-Attenuation Peak Frequency in the Terahertz Band

Yuheng Song , Wanzhu Chang , Kefeng Huang , Kaixin Sun , Chen Yao , Jianjun Ma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph

keywords rain attenuationterahertzdrop size distributionpeak frequencyrainfall rateMie theoryTHz linksattenuation spectrum

0 comments

The pith

All outdoor empirical drop-size models show the terahertz rain attenuation peak migrating to lower frequencies as rainfall rate increases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the frequency of maximum rain-induced loss in terahertz signals by combining Mie calculations with one fixed laboratory Gaussian drop-size distribution and seven outdoor empirical models whose shapes change with rainfall intensity. Unlike the laboratory case, where the peak stays fixed regardless of rain rate, every empirical model shows the peak shifting steadily downward as rainfall grows heavier. This migration follows an asymptotic power-law relation and is driven mainly by the rainfall-dependent characteristic scale of the drop-size distribution. The shift is not explained by changes in total drop number or by temperature effects on water's dielectric properties. The result supplies a compact descriptor for how the dominant loss band evolves under real rainfall, which matters for predicting performance in outdoor terahertz links.

Core claim

Rain introduces broadband and frequency-selective attenuation in wideband terahertz links. Applying Mie theory to a separable laboratory Gaussian DSD and seven outdoor empirical DSD models shows that the peak frequency of total loss, absorption, and scattering remains unchanged with rainfall rate in the fixed-shape laboratory case, but exhibits a monotonic migration toward lower frequencies in all empirical models; this behavior is described by an asymptotic power-law relation and is governed primarily by the rainfall-dependent DSD characteristic scale rather than by total drop concentration or fixed-temperature dielectric dispersion.

What carries the argument

The rainfall-dependent characteristic scale of the drop-size distribution, which sets the location of the Mie-derived attenuation peak through its effect on the size distribution of scattering and absorbing particles.

If this is right

The attenuation peak frequency decreases monotonically with increasing rainfall rate according to an asymptotic power-law in every empirical DSD model examined.
The migration is insensitive to temperature-induced changes in the complex permittivity of water at fixed DSD shape.
Changes in total drop concentration produce far smaller shifts than changes in the characteristic scale parameter.
The laboratory fixed-shape Gaussian DSD produces no migration, highlighting the importance of rainfall-dependent DSD variability.
A single power-law descriptor can therefore summarize the dominant loss region for broadband THz link budgets under varying rain.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Link planners could incorporate the power-law directly into frequency-selection tools for rain-prone THz deployments without running full Mie spectra for every rate.
The same DSD-scale mechanism might produce analogous peak migrations in other atmospheric attenuation processes such as fog or snow at THz frequencies.
Controlled field trials that record both DSD spectra and THz attenuation spectra simultaneously would provide the most direct test of whether the characteristic scale dominates in actual rain.
If the power-law holds, it offers a route to reduce the dimensionality of rain-impairment models used in system-level simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The seven outdoor empirical DSD models and the laboratory Gaussian DSD accurately represent real rainfall, and the peak location is controlled mainly by the rainfall-dependent characteristic scale rather than by other unexamined factors.

What would settle it

Outdoor measurements of the full attenuation spectrum in a terahertz link across a range of measured rainfall rates, checking whether the observed peak frequency follows the predicted monotonic downward power-law migration.

read the original abstract

Rain introduces broadband and frequency-selective attenuation in wideband terahertz (THz) links, making it necessary to identify a compact spectral descriptor that captures how the dominant loss region evolves with rainfall conditions. This article investigates the peak-frequency behavior of rain attenuation by combining Mie-theory calculations with one separable laboratory Gaussian drop-size distribution (DSD) and seven outdoor empirical DSD models whose spectral shapes vary with rainfall rate. The analysis compares total-loss, absorption, and scattering components, examines the roles of characteristic DSD scale and representative drop-size statistics, and evaluates the effect of temperature on the peak location. The results show that, unlike the fixed-shape laboratory case where the peak frequency remains unchanged with rainfall rate, all outdoor empirical DSD models exhibit a monotonic migration of the attenuation peak toward lower frequencies as rainfall rate increases; this behavior is well described by an asymptotic power-law relation and is governed primarily by the rainfall-dependent DSD characteristic scale rather than by total drop concentration or fixed-temperature dielectric dispersion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Outdoor empirical DSDs shift the THz rain attenuation peak lower with heavier rain via a power-law tied to the changing scale parameter, unlike fixed lab distributions.

read the letter

The main finding is that the seven outdoor empirical drop-size distributions produce a monotonic downward shift in the frequency of peak rain attenuation as rainfall rate rises, and this shift follows an asymptotic power-law driven mostly by the rainfall-dependent characteristic scale. The fixed-shape laboratory Gaussian shows no such movement. The paper separates absorption from scattering, checks temperature sensitivity, and contrasts the models directly using Mie theory on standard inputs. That contrast is the cleanest part of the work and makes the role of realistic DSD variation easy to see. The power-law description is presented as descriptive for these particular models rather than a universal law, which keeps the claim scoped appropriately. The approach is straightforward and uses established tools, so the calculations themselves look reproducible from the description. The soft spots are modest but real. The abstract gives no error bars, no details on how the power-law parameters were obtained, and no quantitative test of how well the models match actual measured spectra under the same conditions. Everything rests on literature DSDs, so the result is only as good as those inputs; any systematic bias in the chosen outdoor models would propagate directly. Temperature effects are examined but the abstract does not show how large they are relative to the scale-driven shift. This paper is for THz link engineers and atmospheric propagation modelers who need a compact spectral descriptor for rain loss. A reader building system budgets or running simulations would get immediate use from the comparative results and the power-law relation. It is not a broad theoretical advance, but the scoped observation is clear enough to be worth checking. I would bring it to a reading group to discuss DSD selection and would cite the power-law fit if I were writing a THz propagation paper. It deserves peer review because the central claim is internally consistent, the methods are standard, and the practical angle is useful even if more validation data would strengthen it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents Mie-theory-based calculations of rain attenuation spectra in the THz band using a fixed-shape laboratory Gaussian DSD and seven empirical outdoor DSD models that change with rainfall rate. It finds that all outdoor models show a monotonic shift of the total attenuation peak to lower frequencies with increasing rainfall rate, unlike the laboratory case, and that this shift follows an asymptotic power-law dependence primarily driven by the rainfall-dependent DSD characteristic scale, with comparisons of absorption vs. scattering and temperature sensitivity.

Significance. Should the central findings hold, this work provides a practical spectral descriptor for rain attenuation in THz links, which could inform the design of outdoor wireless systems operating in this band. The strength lies in the systematic comparison across multiple established DSD models, the separation of loss mechanisms, and the isolation of the DSD scale effect through the fixed-shape control case. These elements make the results reproducible in principle using standard tools and literature models.

major comments (2)

[Results] The assertion that the peak migration 'is well described by an asymptotic power-law relation' is not supported by reported goodness-of-fit metrics, fitted parameter values with uncertainties, or details on the peak extraction method from the attenuation spectra; this information is needed to substantiate the description for the main claim.
[Methods] No error bars or uncertainty quantification is provided for the computed peak frequencies across the DSD models and rainfall rates, which limits assessment of the robustness of the observed monotonic migration and its distinction from the fixed DSD case.

minor comments (2)

The abstract could benefit from specifying the frequency range considered for the THz band and the rainfall rate values used in the analysis.
Consider adding a table summarizing the seven empirical DSD models and their key parameters for easier reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments, which will improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] The assertion that the peak migration 'is well described by an asymptotic power-law relation' is not supported by reported goodness-of-fit metrics, fitted parameter values with uncertainties, or details on the peak extraction method from the attenuation spectra; this information is needed to substantiate the description for the main claim.

Authors: We agree that quantitative support is required to substantiate the description. The revised manuscript will add: (i) the peak extraction procedure (identifying the frequency at which the total attenuation spectrum reaches its maximum value), (ii) the fitted asymptotic power-law parameters (peak frequency proportional to rainfall rate to the power alpha) together with their standard errors from nonlinear least-squares regression, and (iii) goodness-of-fit statistics (R-squared and root-mean-square error) for each of the seven outdoor DSD models. These additions will be presented in a new table and accompanying text without changing the reported trends or conclusions. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods] No error bars or uncertainty quantification is provided for the computed peak frequencies across the DSD models and rainfall rates, which limits assessment of the robustness of the observed monotonic migration and its distinction from the fixed DSD case.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of uncertainty estimates in the submitted version. Although the Mie calculations themselves are deterministic, the empirical DSD models carry parameter uncertainties reported in their source references. In the revision we will propagate these uncertainties through the peak-frequency calculation and display the resulting error bars on the relevant figures. This will allow direct visual assessment of the monotonicity and its separation from the constant peak frequency of the fixed-shape laboratory Gaussian DSD. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central results are obtained by applying standard Mie scattering theory to seven literature empirical DSD models (whose parameters vary with rainfall rate) and one fixed-shape laboratory Gaussian DSD. The observed monotonic downward shift of the total-attenuation peak frequency, its power-law description, and its attribution to the rate-dependent characteristic scale are direct numerical outputs of these external inputs rather than any internal fit, self-definition, or self-citation chain. No equation or claim reduces a reported prediction to a parameter defined by the same data set, and the fixed-shape control case isolates the DSD-variation effect without circularity. All steps rest on independently published DSD parameterizations and well-established scattering calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard Mie scattering theory for spherical drops and seven pre-existing empirical DSD models from the literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mie theory accurately computes absorption and scattering for rain drops at terahertz frequencies
Invoked for separating total loss into absorption and scattering components across all DSD models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1265 out tokens · 45515 ms · 2026-05-10T07:45:11.925817+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references

[1]

Its suitability for high-capacity wireless communication scenarios has been investigated extensively [2-4]

Introduction The push toward sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks has elevated the terahertz (THz) band (0.1-10 THz) from a laboratory research topic to a serious candidate for ultra-high-capacity data links [1]. Its suitability for high-capacity wireless communication scenarios has been investigated extensively [2-4]. Studies surveying opportunities a...
[2]

<1000 N/A Theoretical Double-Debye permittivity model for water
[3]

1-1000 0.1-100 Theoretical Decomposition of rain extinction into absorption/scattering
[4]

1-1000 N/A Theoretical Power-law γ = kRα, 1-1000 GHz
[5]

<25000 N/A Theoretical 3-relaxation + 2-resonance permittivity model, 0-25 THz
[6]

57-134 10-80 Outdoor measurement 10-Gbit/s outdoor rain measurements at 120 GHz
[7]

1-1000 10-200 Theoretical Temperature and multiple-scattering effects on rain attenuation
[8]

<1000 2.5-150 Theoretical Comprehensive review; peak at ~100 GHz explicitly noted
[9]

625 <500 Laboratory measurement Controlled rain chamber, 625 GHz THz/IR comparison
[10]

8-1000 1-100 Theoretical 8-1000 GHz Mie calculations confirming ~100 GHz peak
[11]

100-3000 0.25-100 Theoretical Above-100 GHz survey; rain flattens above 100 GHz
[12]

77, 300 <20 Outdoor measurement 77/300 GHz simultaneous rain measurements
[13]

30-1000 <150 Theoretical Rain-rate PDF effects on mm-wave/THz system performance
[14]

80-200 <100 Outdoor measurement 80-200 GHz, 12-year DSD-based characterization
[15]

140 6.8-30.6 733-14296 Indoor & outdoor measurement Indoor + outdoor 140 GHz rain; DSD sensitivity demonstrated
[16]

empirical vs

240, 270, 300 <100 Outdoor measurement 240/270/300 GHz DSD-based vs. empirical vs. ITU-R
[17]

220, 225, 229 <25 Outdoor measurement 220-230 GHz outdoor rain; log-normal DSD improves fit
[18]

Laboratory Gaussian DSD case We adopt a multi-DSD modeling framework based on Mie-scattering theory rather than the empirical ITU-R P.838-3 model. This is because that Mie-theory approaches combined with explicit DSD information have been shown to provide a more accurate explanation of measured rain-attenuation results in the sub-THz and THz bands [11, 12...
[19]

Outdoor empirical DSD models Under natural outdoor rainfall, the DSD varies substantially with precipitation type and intensity [29], in sharp contrast to the fixed-shape laboratory condition analyzed in Section 2. To investigate the peak-frequency behavior across this broader range of microphysical conditions, several representative empirical DSD models ...
[20]

The term BR-p captures the dominant downward migration, while f∞ represents the high-rainfall plateau

is peak ( ) pf R f BR   (11) where f∞ is the asymptotic peak frequency, B is an amplitude coefficient, and p is the decay exponent. The term BR-p captures the dominant downward migration, while f∞ represents the high-rainfall plateau. To test whether an explicit transition parameter improves the fit, the Hill form [35] is also considered, as peak ( ) ...
[21]

The curves do not coincide, but they share a consistent qualitative behavior

Cross-model scale interpretation Figure 4(a) shows the total-loss peak frequency as a function of rainfall rate for all eight empirical DSD models at T = 27oC. The curves do not coincide, but they share a consistent qualitative behavior. For every model, fpeak decreases monotonically with increasing R, and the rate of decrease gradually weakens in the hig...
[22]

In outdoor environments, however, rain events occur over a finite temperature range, and the temperature sensitivity of the peak location must therefore be assessed separately

Temperature dependence Sections 3 and 4 considered T = 27oC in order to isolate the effect of rainfall-dependent DSD evolution on peak-frequency migration. In outdoor environments, however, rain events occur over a finite temperature range, and the temperature sensitivity of the peak location must therefore be assessed separately. At fixed rainfall rate a...
[23]

Conclusion Rain attenuation in the THz band is inherently frequency selective, so characterizing only the attenuation magnitude at a few discrete frequencies is insufficient for wideband link analysis. In this article, the spectral peak frequency of rain attenuation was investigated as a compact channel descriptor using Mie-theory-based calculations under...
[24]

Key enabling technologies for 6G: The role of UAVs, terahertz communication, and intelligent reconfigurable surfaces in shaping the future of wireless networks,

W. M. Othman, A. A. Ateya, M. E. Nasr, et al., "Key enabling technologies for 6G: The role of UAVs, terahertz communication, and intelligent reconfigurable surfaces in shaping the future of wireless networks," Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 14, 30 (2025)

2025
[25]

Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond,

T. S. Rappaport, Y. Xing, O. Kanhere, et al., "Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond," IEEE Access 7, 78729-78757 (2019)

2019
[26]

Review of weather impact on outdoor terahertz wireless communication links,

J. F. Federici, J. Ma, and L. Moeller, "Review of weather impact on outdoor terahertz wireless communication links," Nano Communication Networks 10, 13-26 (2016)

2016
[27]

Terahertz channels in atmospheric conditions: Propagation characteristics and security performance,

J. Ma, Y. Song, M. Zhang, et al., "Terahertz channels in atmospheric conditions: Propagation characteristics and security performance," Fundamental Research 5, 526-555 (2025)

2025
[28]

J. Ma, P. Li, and W. Liu, Terahertz Channel Measurement, Modeling, and Security Properties: Fundamentals, Techniques, and Applications (CRC Press, 2025)

2025
[29]

Measurement and modeling on terahertz channels in rain,

P. Li, W. Liu, J. Liu, et al., "Measurement and modeling on terahertz channels in rain," Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 46, 2 (2025)

2025
[30]

Terahertz channel power and BER performance in rain,

Y. Song, J. Cui, G. Liu, et al., "Terahertz channel power and BER performance in rain," Optics Express 33, 11336-11349 (2025)

2025
[31]

Performance degradation of terahertz channels in emulated rain,

P. Li, J. Wang, L. Zhao, et al., "Performance degradation of terahertz channels in emulated rain," Nano Communication Networks 35, 100431 (2023)

2023
[32]

Effect of rain attenuation for a 10-Gb/s 120-GHz-band millimeter-wave wireless link,

A. Hirata, R. Yamaguchi, H. Takahashi, et al., "Effect of rain attenuation for a 10-Gb/s 120-GHz-band millimeter-wave wireless link," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 57, 3099-3105 (2009)

2009
[33]

Rain attenuation at millimeter wave and low-THz frequencies,

F. Norouzian, E. Marchetti, M. Gashinova, et al., "Rain attenuation at millimeter wave and low-THz frequencies," IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation 68, 421-431 (2019)

2019
[34]

Experimental comparison of terahertz and infrared signaling in laboratory-controlled rain,

J. Ma, F. Vorrius, L. Lamb, et al., "Experimental comparison of terahertz and infrared signaling in laboratory-controlled rain," Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 36, 856-865 (2015)

2015
[35]

Comparison of experimental and theoretical determined terahertz attenuation in controlled rain,

J. Ma, F. Vorrius, L. Lamb, et al., "Comparison of experimental and theoretical determined terahertz attenuation in controlled rain," Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 36, 1195-1202 (2015)

2015
[36]

The size distribution of raindrops,

A. Best, "The size distribution of raindrops," Quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society 76, 16-36 (1950)

1950
[37]

Rain Attenuation in the Microwave-to-Terahertz Waveband,

S. Ishii, M. Kinugawa, S. Wakiyama, et al., "Rain Attenuation in the Microwave-to-Terahertz Waveband," Wireless Engineering and Technology 07, 59-66 (2016)

2016
[38]

Characterization of rain attenuation in 80–200 GHz from experimental drop size distributions,

J. M. Riera, D. Pimienta-del-Valle, S. Perez-Pena, et al., "Characterization of rain attenuation in 80–200 GHz from experimental drop size distributions," IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation 71, 4371-4379 (2023)

2023
[39]

Rain attenuations based on drop size distribution (DSD) model and empirical model at low THz frequencies,

Y. Kim, J. Kim, J. Oh, et al., "Rain attenuations based on drop size distribution (DSD) model and empirical model at low THz frequencies," Electronics 13, 9 (2023)

2023
[40]

Communication systems performance at mm and THz as a function of a rain rate probability density function model,

J. Kupferman and S. Arnon, "Communication systems performance at mm and THz as a function of a rain rate probability density function model," Sensors 22, 6269 (2022)

2022
[41]

Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods,

ITU-R, "Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods," (International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, , 2003)

2003
[42]

Electromagnetic wave propagation in rain and polarization effects,

S. Okamura and T. Oguchi, "Electromagnetic wave propagation in rain and polarization effects," Proceedings of the Japan academy, series B 86, 539-562 (2010)

2010
[43]

A model for the complex permittivity of water at frequencies below 1 THz,

H. J. Liebe, G. A. Hufford, and T. Manabe, "A model for the complex permittivity of water at frequencies below 1 THz," International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves 12, 659-675 (1991)

1991
[44]

Effects of rain on propagation, absorption and scattering of microwave radiation based on the dielectric model of Liebe,

C. Mätzler and L. Martin, "Effects of rain on propagation, absorption and scattering of microwave radiation based on the dielectric model of Liebe," IAP Res. Rep (2002)

2002
[45]

Effect of temperature and multiple scattering on rain attenuation of electromagnetic waves by a simple spherical model,

E. Setijadi, A. Matsushima, N. Tanaka, et al., "Effect of temperature and multiple scattering on rain attenuation of electromagnetic waves by a simple spherical model," Progress In Electromagnetics Research 99, 339-354 (2009)

2009
[46]

A general approach to double-moment normalization of drop size distributions,

G. W. Lee, I. Zawadzki, W. Szyrmer, et al., "A general approach to double-moment normalization of drop size distributions," Journal of applied meteorology 43, 264-281 (2004)

2004
[47]

Characteristics of DSD bulk parameters: Implication for radar rain retrieval,

L. Liao, R. Meneghini, T. Iguchi, et al., "Characteristics of DSD bulk parameters: Implication for radar rain retrieval," Atmosphere 11, 670 (2020)

2020
[48]

H. R. Pruppacher and J. D. Klett, Microphysics of clouds and precipitation: Reprinted 1980 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

1980
[49]

Raindrop size distribution in different climatic regimes from disdrometer and dual-polarized radar analysis,

V. Bringi, V. Chandrasekar, J. Hubbert, et al., "Raindrop size distribution in different climatic regimes from disdrometer and dual-polarized radar analysis," Journal of the atmospheric sciences 60, 354-365 (2003)

2003
[50]

Long-term rain attenuation measurement for short-range mmWave fixed link using DSD and ITU-R prediction models,

O. Zahid and S. Salous, "Long-term rain attenuation measurement for short-range mmWave fixed link using DSD and ITU-R prediction models," Radio Science 57, 1-21 (2022)

2022
[51]

Rain attenuation at terahertz,

S. Ishii, "Rain attenuation at terahertz," Wireless Engineering and Technology 1, 92-95 (2010)

2010
[52]

Long and F

D. Long and F. Ulaby, Microwave radar and radiometric remote sensing (Artech, 2015)

2015
[53]

The distribution of raindrops with size,

J. S. Marshall and W. M. K. Palmer, "The distribution of raindrops with size," Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 5, 165-166
[54]

Raindrop size distribution and sampling size errors,

J. Joss and A. Waldvogel, "Raindrop size distribution and sampling size errors," Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 26, 566-569 (1969)

1969
[55]

Backscatter and attenuation by falling snow and rain at 96, 140, and 225 GHz,

J. Nemarich, R. J. Wellman, and J. Lacombe, "Backscatter and attenuation by falling snow and rain at 96, 140, and 225 GHz," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 26, 319-329 (1988)

1988
[56]

Shapes and oscillations of falling raindrops—A review,

M. Szakall, S. K. Mitra, K. Diehl, et al., "Shapes and oscillations of falling raindrops—A review," Atmospheric research 97, 416-425 (2010)

2010
[57]

Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice,

A. Newell and P. S. Rosenbloom, "Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice," in Cognitive skills and their acquisition (Psychology Press, 2013), pp. 1-55

2013
[58]

Motulsky and A

H. Motulsky and A. Christopoulos, Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: a practical guide to curve fitting (Oxford University Press, 2004)

2004
[59]

Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law,

M. E. Newman, "Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law," Contemporary physics 46, 323-351 (2005)

2005
[60]

Distribution characteristics of the summer precipitation raindrop spectrum on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau,

F. Wang, Y. Duan, Y. Huo, et al., "Distribution characteristics of the summer precipitation raindrop spectrum on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 17, 6933-6944 (2024)

2024
[61]

Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel 2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers,

M. Angulo-Martínez, S. Beguería, B. Latorre, et al., "Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel 2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers," Hydrology Earth System Sciences 22, 2811-2837 (2018)

2018
[62]

Weather-Aware Power Control for Decentralized V2V Communication,

J. Liu and C.-T. Huang, "Weather-Aware Power Control for Decentralized V2V Communication," in 2025 34th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), (IEEE, 2025), 1-9

2025
[63]

Weather-Aware LoRaWAN Channel Selection Using Bandit Algorithms,

S. Kumar, "Weather-Aware LoRaWAN Channel Selection Using Bandit Algorithms," in 2023 IEEE 9th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), (IEEE, 2023), 1-6

2023