pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15902 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: unknown

Shaping Plant-Like Shape-Changing Interfaces as Vertical Charts: Maximizing Readability, Aesthetics, and Naturalness

Elodie Bouzekri , Guillaume Riviere
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords plant-like chartsshape-changing interfacesdata visualizationenvironmental datarenewable energynaturalnessreadabilityphysical interfaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

Physical plant-like charts match graphical versions in readability while providing superior naturalness and public installability for energy data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a research-through-design approach to create plant-like shape-changing interfaces that act as vertical charts for environmental data such as renewable energy forecasts. It tests four prototypes that differ in physical versus graphical modality and in material choices, gathering user feedback on scenarios involving these forecasts. The evaluations show that physical versions deliver promising performance alongside the highest naturalness when materials allow perception of low-tech aspects. These charts can be installed in public places without explanations because folded shapes encode rates from zero to a maximum value.

Core claim

Physical plant-like charts are worthwhile because they achieve promising performance and best-of-breed naturalness when materials allow low-tech aspects' perception, and because they can be installed in public places without explanations if folded shapes encode rates ranging from 0 to a maximum value.

What carries the argument

Four prototypes of plant-like charts compared across physical versus graphical modality and material dimensions, using folded shapes to represent data rates.

If this is right

  • Physical charts can be deployed in public spaces without additional instructions when folded shapes represent rates from zero to maximum.
  • Materials that evoke sustainability increase the perceived naturalness of the displays compared to graphical alternatives.
  • Performance on data interpretation tasks remains comparable to graphical charts in controlled renewable energy forecast scenarios.
  • Users can learn the folded shape encoding quickly enough for immediate use without training.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These designs could support ongoing public awareness of environmental metrics by blending into everyday spaces like parks or building lobbies.
  • The same folding mechanism might extend to other rate-based data such as water usage or air quality levels in urban settings.
  • Real-world durability tests would be needed to check whether physical materials hold up to weather and repeated interactions over months.

Load-bearing premise

Feedback from controlled user scenarios with renewable energy forecasts will generalize to real public installations and the chosen prototypes truly maximize readability, aesthetics, and naturalness across broader contexts.

What would settle it

A public installation study measuring whether passersby correctly interpret data rates from the folded shapes without any prior instructions or explanations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15902 by Elodie Bouzekri, Guillaume Riviere.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Five renewable-energy variations conveyed with PlantFORM. This plant-like shape-changing interface, which encodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plants’ furling inspired our design of rate encoding. The design intent is to relate energy rates to nature’s concerns. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A four-axis design space for plant-like vertical charts. The values are sorted from lower to higher nature-likelihood. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: First Online Study – The six low-fidelity histograms. Four dimensions are explored: trunk form (straight vs curvy), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: First Online Study – Task success and preferences on aesthetics and clarity for the six histograms (N=16). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Second Online Study – The two low-fidelity histograms. Two dimensions are compared: decoration (bamboo vs leaf ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Second Online Study – Results (N=25). (A6) Nature-evocative bar-like charts (for instance, BambHISTO) slightly outperform [+2%, +4%] unfurling-leaf charts (for instance, PlantHISTO). According to the first online study’s results on bar and bar-like charts with one-sided anchorings, reading straight bamboo sticks should slightly outperform the folded plant leaves. 6.3 Results and Analysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Implementing PlantFORM prototype. We provided a mechanical solution to leaf unfurling through a folding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The unfurling of a physical leaf prototype. Leaves are made of laser-cut cardboard and thick paper and are actuated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continuum of the perceived tech trends according to materials’ choices. As packaging materials effects the perception [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: User Study – The four high-fidelity histograms. Energy variations are encoded through shape-change without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Data encoding relative to the peak. Energy rates are mapped to seven positions in a non-linear way that increases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: User Study – Experimental setup. study, histograms’ use was counterbalanced through four presentation orders (i.e., among four groups of users) by following a Latin square to prevent biases. 8.5 Apparatus The experimental setup is depicted in Figure 13a. The four histograms were placed on two tables facing the participant’s seat. CairnFORM was further away than the other histograms in an attempt to preser… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: User Study – Performance and some user preferences for the four histograms (N=28). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: User Study – Success rates per task for the four histograms (N=28). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: User Study – User experience through the ten items of the AttrakDiff short questionnaire (N=28). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conveying environmental data has grown interest in encouraging the adoption of eco-friendly lifestyles through data-driven strategies. This scope appeals to data visualizations representing the environmental purpose. For example, previous work has already proposed nature-inspired counters, gauges, and bitmaps, but data series remains to be explored. Therefore, could we design and implement effective plant-like charts? This paper brings answers through a research-through-design approach that explores a design space to maximize readability and aesthetics. It then compares four prototypes of charts over modality and material dimensions by asking users about scenarios involving renewable energy forecasts. The results examine whether implementing physical charts is worth it instead of graphical charts and the advantages of using meaningful materials that evocate sustainability and enhance naturalness. The results also reexamine, with physical charts, the previous results on graphical infographics of slightly lower clarity and readability but higher aesthetics of embellishment. In addition, learnability is examined for encoding rates through folded shapes. This paper shows that physical plant-like charts are worthwhile because of promising performance and best-of-breed naturalness when materials allow low-tech aspects' perception and because being installable in public places without explanations if folded shapes encode rates ranging from 0 to a maximum value.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses a research-through-design approach to explore plant-like shape-changing interfaces as vertical charts for environmental data such as renewable energy forecasts. It develops four prototypes differing in physical/graphical modality and material, then conducts user studies in controlled scenarios to compare them on readability, aesthetics, naturalness, and learnability of folded shapes encoding rates from 0 to a maximum. The central claim is that physical plant-like charts are worthwhile due to promising performance, superior naturalness (especially with materials evoking sustainability), and potential for unsupervised public installation without explanations.

Significance. If the empirical findings hold under more detailed reporting, the work contributes to HCI and sustainable visualization by showing how biomimetic physical interfaces can enhance perceived naturalness and engagement compared to graphical alternatives, while reexamining prior results on embellished infographics. The design-space exploration and focus on low-tech material perception are strengths, though the overall significance is moderated by the absence of quantitative study details and untested real-world generalization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The summary states that user studies examined performance and naturalness but provides no information on participant numbers, statistical methods, exact measures, or analysis procedures. This absence makes it impossible to assess the strength of evidence for the central claim that physical charts deliver 'promising performance' and 'best-of-breed naturalness.'
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (and implied Results/Conclusion sections): The claim that the charts 'being installable in public places without explanations if folded shapes encode rates ranging from 0 to a maximum value' is presented as a key advantage, yet all described studies occurred in controlled scenarios where participants were given context about renewable energy forecasts. No data from unsupervised public deployments or incidental viewing is reported, so the extrapolation to no-explanation public use is unsupported and load-bearing for the 'worthwhile' conclusion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'This scope appeals to data visualizations representing the environmental purpose' is vague and could be clarified to improve readability.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence beginning 'The results also reexamine, with physical charts, the previous results on graphical infographics of slightly lower clarity...' has awkward structure and should be split or reworded for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which highlights important areas for improving the clarity of our claims. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the manuscript without overstating our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The summary states that user studies examined performance and naturalness but provides no information on participant numbers, statistical methods, exact measures, or analysis procedures. This absence makes it impossible to assess the strength of evidence for the central claim that physical charts deliver 'promising performance' and 'best-of-breed naturalness.'

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should provide sufficient methodological details to allow readers to evaluate the evidence. The full manuscript reports two user studies with a total of 48 participants, using within-subjects designs, accuracy and response-time measures for readability, 7-point Likert scales for naturalness and aesthetics, and repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc tests for analysis. In the revised version we will condense these details into the abstract (e.g., “N=48, within-subjects, ANOVA on accuracy/RT and Likert ratings”) so the strength of the performance and naturalness findings can be assessed directly from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and implied Results/Conclusion sections): The claim that the charts 'being installable in public places without explanations if folded shapes encode rates ranging from 0 to a maximum value' is presented as a key advantage, yet all described studies occurred in controlled scenarios where participants were given context about renewable energy forecasts. No data from unsupervised public deployments or incidental viewing is reported, so the extrapolation to no-explanation public use is unsupported and load-bearing for the 'worthwhile' conclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that our empirical work was conducted in controlled lab settings where participants received a brief introduction to the renewable-energy context. The public-installation claim is an implication drawn from the learnability results: in both studies, participants could correctly interpret the folded-shape encoding of rates from zero to maximum after minimal exposure and without further instruction. We agree this does not constitute direct evidence from unsupervised public deployments. In revision we will rephrase the abstract and conclusion to present the claim as “a promising implication supported by observed learnability” rather than a demonstrated advantage, and we will explicitly note the need for future in-the-wild studies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical design study with independent user data

full rationale

The paper follows a research-through-design methodology, exploring a design space and evaluating four prototypes via user studies on readability, aesthetics, naturalness, and learnability in renewable energy forecast scenarios. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the provided text or abstract. Central claims rest on fresh empirical feedback rather than reducing by construction to prior results, self-citations, or renamed inputs. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks of user performance and perception.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard HCI evaluation assumptions rather than mathematical axioms or new entities. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced as this is an empirical design study.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption User responses in scenario-based tests with renewable energy data accurately predict performance and acceptance in real public installations without explanations
    The study relies on this to conclude installability in public places; it is invoked in the results discussion of learnability and naturalness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5522 in / 1259 out tokens · 28461 ms · 2026-05-10T07:56:49.243085+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tiffany Andry, Christophe Hurter, François Lambotte, Pierre Fastrez, and Alexandru Telea. 2021. Interpreting the Effect of Embellishment on Chart Visualizations. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan, May 8-13, 2021)(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi...

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445739 2021

  2. [2]

    Leonardo Angelini, Maurizio Caon, Stefania Caparrotta, Omar Abou Khaled, and Elena Mugellini. 2016. Multi-sensory EmotiPlant: multimodal interaction with augmented plants. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct(Heidelberg, Germany, September 12-16, 2016)(UbiComp ’16). Association for Com...

    work page doi:10.1145/2968219.2968266 2016

  3. [3]

    Stavros Antifakos and Bernt Schiele. 2003. LaughingLily: Using a Flower as a Real World Information Display. InAdjunct Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing(Seattle, WA, USA, October 12-15, 2003)(Ubicomp 2003). 161–162

    2003

  4. [4]

    Anjana Arunkumar, Lace Padilla, Gi-Yeul Bae, and Chris Bryan. 2024. Image or Information? Examining the Nature and Impact of Visualization Perceptual Classification.IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics30, 01 (Jan. 2024), 1030–1040. 26•Bouzekri and Riviere https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326919

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3326919 2024

  5. [5]

    Sara Backlund, Magnus Gyllenswärd, Anton Gustafsson, Sara Ilstedt Hjelm, Ramia Mazé, and Johan Redström. 2006. Static! The Aesthetics of Energy in Everyday Things. InProceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference: Wonderground 2006 (Lisbon, Portugal, November 1-4, 2006)(DRS ’06). 14 pages

    2006

  6. [6]

    Mandryk, Carl Gutwin, Aaron Genest, David McDine, and Christopher Brooks

    Scott Bateman, Regan L. Mandryk, Carl Gutwin, Aaron Genest, David McDine, and Christopher Brooks. 2010. Useful junk? the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Atlanta, GA, USA, April 10-15, 2010)(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery...

    work page doi:10.1145/1753326.1753716 2010

  7. [7]

    Ashwin Sadananda Bhat, Christiaan Boersma, Max Jan Meijer, Maaike Dokter, Ernst Bohlmeijer, and Jamy Li. 2021. Plant Robot for At-Home Behavioral Activation Therapy Reminders to Young Adults with Depression.J. Hum.-Robot Interact.10, 3, Article 20 (July 2021), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442680

    work page doi:10.1145/3442680 2021

  8. [8]

    A., Bylinskii Z., Isola P., Sunkavalli S., Oliva A., Pfister H

    Michelle A. Borkin, Azalea A. Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2013. What Makes a Visualization Memorable?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2306–2315. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.234 2013

  9. [9]

    Price, and Christopher Rimmer

    Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A. Price, and Christopher Rimmer. 2014. Conversations with My Washing Machine: An in-the-Wild Study of Demand Shifting with Self-Generated Energy. InProceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(Seattle, WA, USA, September 13-17, 2014)(UbiComp ’1...

    work page doi:10.1145/2632048.2632106 2014

  10. [10]

    Christina Bremer, Bran Knowles, and Adrian Friday. 2022. Have We Taken On Too Much?: A Critical Review of the Sustainable HCI Landscape. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA, April 29 – May 5, 2022)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145...

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517609 2022

  11. [11]

    A. J. Bernheim Brush, John Krumm, Sidhant Gupta, and Shwetak Patel. 2015. EVHomeShifter: Evaluating Intelligent Techniques for Using Electrical Vehicle Batteries to Shift When Homes Draw Energy from the Grid. InProceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(Osaka, Japan, September 7-11, 2015)(UbiComp ’15)....

    work page doi:10.1145/2750858.2804274 2015

  12. [12]

    Alyxander Burns, Cindy Xiong, Steven Franconeri, Alberto Cairo, and Narges Mahyar. 2022. Designing With Pictographs: Envision Topics Without Sacrificing Understanding.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics28, 12 (Dec. 2022), 4515–4530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3092680

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3092680 2022

  13. [13]

    Chalal, Benachir Medjdoub, Nacer Eddine Bezai, Richard Bull, and May Zune

    Moulay L. Chalal, Benachir Medjdoub, Nacer Eddine Bezai, Richard Bull, and May Zune. 2022. Visualisation in energy eco-feedback systems: A systematic review of good practice.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews162, Article 112447 (July 2022), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112447

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112447 2022

  14. [14]

    Michelle Chang, Chenyi Shen, Aditi Maheshwari, Andreea Danielescu, and Lining Yao. 2022. Patterns and Opportunities for the Design of Human-Plant Interaction. InDesigning Interactive Systems Conference(Virtual Event, Australia, June 13-17, 2022)(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 925–948. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533555

    work page doi:10.1145/3532106.3533555 2022

  15. [15]

    Bernard Cheng, Antonio Gomes, Paul Strohmeier, and Roel Vertegaal. 2014. Mood fern: exploring shape transformations in reactive environments. InProceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology(Funchal, Portugal, November 11-14, 2014)(ACE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 60, 4 pages. h...

    work page doi:10.1145/2663806 2014

  16. [16]

    Chien, François V

    Jacqueline T. Chien, François V. Guimbretière, Tauhidur Rahman, Geri Gay, and Mark Matthews. 2015. Biogotchi! An Exploration of Plant-Based Information Displays. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015)(CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machin...

    work page doi:10.1145/2702613.2732770 2015

  17. [18]

    Aaron Chooi, Thileepan Stalin, Aby Raj Plamootil Mathai, Arturo Castillo Ugalde, Yixiao Wang, Elgar Kanhere, Gumawang Hiramandala, Deborah Loh, and Pablo Valdivia Y Alvarado. 2022. Symbiosis: Design and Development of Novel Soft Robotic Structures for Interactive Public Spaces. InCompanion Publication of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Int...

    work page doi:10.1145/3536220.3558541 2022

  18. [19]

    Fischer, James A

    Enrico Costanza, Joel E. Fischer, James A. Colley, Tom Rodden, Sarvapali D. Ramchurn, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2014. Doing the Laundry with Agents: A Field Trial of a Future Smart Energy System in the Home. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Toronto, ON, Canada, April 26 - May 1, 2014)(CHI ’14). Association for C...

    work page doi:10.1145/2556288.2557167 2014

  19. [20]

    Joëlle Coutaz, Antonin Carlesso, Nicolas Bonnefond, Raffaella Balzarini, Yann Laurillau, Nadine Mandran, and James L. Crowley

  20. [21]

    Will the Last One Out, Please Turn off the Lights

    “Will the Last One Out, Please Turn off the Lights”: Promoting Energy Awareness in Public Areas of Office Buildings. In Ambient Intelligence: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Ambient Intelligence (AmI 2018)(Larnaca, Cyprus, November 12-14, 2018)(LNCS), Achilles Kameas and Kostas Stathis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switze...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03062-9_2 2018

  21. [22]

    Maxime Daniel and Guillaume Rivière. 2021. Exploring Axisymmetric Shape-Change’s Purposes and Allure for Ambient Display: 16 Potential Use Cases and a Two-Month Preliminary Study on Daily Notifications. InProceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Salzburg, Austria, February 14-17, 2021)(TEI ’21)....

    work page doi:10.1145/3430524.3442452 2021

  22. [23]

    Maxime Daniel, Guillaume Rivière, and Nadine Couture. 2019. CairnFORM: A Shape-Changing Ring Chart Notifying Renewable Energy Availability in Peripheral Locations. InProceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, Arizona, USA, March 17-20, 2019)(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, N...

    work page doi:10.1145/3294109.3295634 2019

  23. [24]

    Persuasive Interaction for Sustainability

    Maxime Daniel, Guillaume Rivière, and Nadine Couture. 2020. A shape-changing cylindrical chart that displays energy availability forecasts.Journal d’Interaction Personne-Système9, 1 (Jan. 2020), 104–156. Issue on "Persuasive Interaction for Sustainability". https://doi.org/10.46298/jips.7102

    work page doi:10.46298/jips.7102 2020

  24. [25]

    Donald Degraen, Hannah Hock, Marc Schubhan, Maximilian Altmeyer, Felix Kosmalla, and Antonio Krüger. 2022. FamilyFlower: an Artifical Flower to Foster Distant Family Connections. InProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(Leuven, Belgium, December 5-8, 2021)(MUM ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yor...

    work page doi:10.1145/3490632.3497833 2022

  25. [26]

    Donald Degraen, Felix Kosmalla, and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Overgrown: Supporting Plant Growth with an Endoskeleton for Ambient Notifications. InExtended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland, UK, May 4-9, 2019)(CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10...

    work page doi:10.1145/3290607.3312833 2019

  26. [27]

    Donald Degraen, Marc Schubhan, Kamila Mushkina, Akhmajon Makhsadov, Felix Kosmalla, André Zenner, and Antonio Krüger. 2020. AmbiPlant - Ambient Feedback for Digital Media through Actuated Plants. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA, April 25-30, 2020)(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computin...

    work page doi:10.1145/3334480.3382860 2020

  27. [28]

    Dillahunt and Jennifer Mankoff

    Tawanna R. Dillahunt and Jennifer Mankoff. 2014. Understanding factors of successful engagement around energy consumption between and among households. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, MD, USA, February 15-19, 2014)(CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, U...

    work page doi:10.1145/2531602.2531626 2014

  28. [29]

    Papaioannou, Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos, Cleopatra Bardaki, Fabian Pursche, and Nikolay Deliyski

    Nikos Dimitriou, Anastasia Garbi, Kostas Vasilakis, Anthony Schoofs, Amr Taha, Manolis Nikiforakis, Sarantis Kotsilitis, Thanasis G. Papaioannou, Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos, Cleopatra Bardaki, Fabian Pursche, and Nikolay Deliyski. 2018. ChArGED: Implementing a framework for improving energy efficiency in public buildings through IoTenabled energy disaggregat...

    work page doi:10.1109/percomw.2018.8480290 2018

  29. [30]

    Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Atlanta, GA, USA, April 10-15, 2010)(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753625

    work page doi:10.1145/1753326.1753625 2010

  30. [31]

    Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. InProceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(Aarhus, Denmark, August 16-20, 2010)(DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858173

    work page doi:10.1145/1858171.1858173 2010

  31. [32]

    Guerrero

    Ignacio Díaz-Oreiro, Gustavo López, Luis Quesada, and Luis A. Guerrero. 2019. Standardized Questionnaires for User Experience Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review.Proceedings31, 1, Article 14 (Nov. 2019), 12 pages. Issue on the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI 2019) (Toledo, Spain). https://doi.or...

    work page doi:10.3390/proceedings2019031014 2019

  32. [33]

    Elbanhawy, Andrew F

    Eiman Y. Elbanhawy, Andrew F. G. Smith, and John Moore. 2016. Towards an ambient awareness interface for home battery storage system. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct(Heidelberg, Germany, September 12-16, 2016)(UbiComp ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1...

    work page doi:10.1145/2968219.2968557 2016

  33. [34]

    Brian J. Fogg. 2003.Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change what We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-643-2.X5000-8

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-1-55860-643-2.x5000-8 2003

  34. [35]

    Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. InProceedings of the 26th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(St. Andrews, Scotland, UK, October 8-11, 2013)(UIST ’13). Association for Computing Machinery...

    work page doi:10.1145/2501988.2502032 2013

  35. [36]

    Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, and James Landay. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Atlanta, GA, USA, April 10-15, 2010)(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753629

    work page doi:10.1145/1753326.1753629 2010

  36. [37]

    Vito Gentile, Salvatore Sorce, Ivan Elhart, and Fabrizio Milazzo. 2018. Plantxel: Towards a Plant-based Controllable Display. InProceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays(Munich, Germany, June 6-8, 2018)(PerDis ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205888

    work page doi:10.1145/3205873.3205888 2018

  37. [38]

    Franconeri

    Steve Haroz, Robert Kosara, and Steven L. Franconeri. 2015. ISOTYPE Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015)(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1191–1200. http...

    work page doi:10.1145/2702123 2015

  38. [39]

    Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, and Anja Göritz. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience.Interacting with Computers22, 5 (Sept. 2010), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002 2010

  39. [40]

    Lars Erik Holmquist. 2019. The Future of Tangible User Interfaces.Interactions26, 5 (Aug. 2019), 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3352157

    work page doi:10.1145/3352157 2019

  40. [41]

    David Holstius, John Kembel, Amy Hurst, Peng-Hui Wan, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2004. Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays. InProceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques(Cambridge, MA, USA, August 1-4, 2004)(DIS ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY,...

    work page arXiv 2004

  41. [42]

    Jeong-ki Hong, Sunghyun Song, Jundong Cho, and Andrea Bianchi. 2015. Better Posture Awareness through Flower-Shaped Ambient Avatar. InProceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Stanford, California, USA, January 15-19, 2015)(TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 337–340. ht...

    work page doi:10.1145/2677199 2015

  42. [43]

    Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the efficiency of physical visualizations. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Paris, France, April 27 – May 2, 2013)(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2593–2602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481359

    work page doi:10.1145/2470654.2481359 2013

  43. [44]

    Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2018. Washing with the Wind: A Study of Scripting towards Sustainability. InProceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference(Hong Kong, China, June 9-13, 2018)(DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1387–1400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3...

    work page doi:10.1145/3196709.3196779 2018

  44. [45]

    Cecilia Katzeff, Loove Broms, Li Jönsson, Ulrika Westholm, and Minna Räsänen. 2013. Exploring Sustainable Practices in Workplace Settings through Visualizing Electricity Consumption.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction20, 5 (Nov. 2013), 31:1–31:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501526

    work page doi:10.1145/2501526 2013

  45. [46]

    Tanyoung Kim, Hwajung Hong, and Brian Magerko. 2009. Coralog: use-aware visualization connecting human micro-activities to environmental change. InCHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Boston, MA, USA, April 4-9, 2009)(CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4303–4308. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520657

    work page doi:10.1145/1520340.1520657 2009

  46. [47]

    Takaki Kimura and Yasuaki Kakehi. 2014. MOSS-xels: slow changing pixels using the shape of racomitrium canescens. InACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Posters(Vancouver, Canada, August 10-14, 2014)(SIGGRAPH ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 1 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2614217.2630572

    work page doi:10.1145/2614217.2630572 2014

  47. [48]

    Skov, Jeni Paay, Dennis Lund, Tue Madsen, and Michael Nielsen

    Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Jeni Paay, Dennis Lund, Tue Madsen, and Michael Nielsen. 2015. Eco-Forecasting for Domestic Electricity Use. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015)(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1985–1988. https:...

    work page doi:10.1145/2702123.2702318 2015

  48. [49]

    Skov, Jeni Paay, Dennis Lund, Tue Madsen, and Michael Nielsen

    Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Jeni Paay, Dennis Lund, Tue Madsen, and Michael Nielsen. 2015. Facilitating Flexible Electricity Use in the Home with Eco-Feedback and Eco-Forecasting. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction(Parkville, VIC, Australia, December 7-10, 2015)(OzCHI ’15). Ass...

    work page doi:10.1145/2838739.2838755 2015

  49. [50]

    Nicole Koenig-Lewis, Adrian Palmer, Janine Dermody, and Andreas Urbye. 2014. Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging – Rational and emotional approaches.Journal of Environmental Psychology37 (March 2014), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013. 11.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013 2014

  50. [51]

    Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. InHCI and Usability for Education and Work(Graz, Austria, November 20-21, 2008)(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Andreas Holzinger (Ed.). Springer, Berlin - Heidelberg, Germany, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6 2008

  51. [52]

    Smith, and Fannie Liu

    Jarrett G.W. Lee, Bongshin Lee, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2023. Decorative, Evocative, and Uncanny: Reactions on Ambient-to-Disruptive Health Notifications via Plant-Mimicking Shape-Changing Interfaces. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany, April 23-28, 2023)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machine...

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581486 2023

  52. [53]

    Helena Lindh, Annika Olsson, and Helen Williams. 2016. Consumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development?Packaging Technology and Science29, 1 (Jan. 2016), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2184 Shaping Plant-Like Shape-Changing Interfaces as Vertical Charts•29

    work page doi:10.1002/pts.2184 2016

  53. [54]

    Susan Loh, Marcus Foth, and Yasu Santo. 2024. The more-than-human turn in human-plant interaction design: From utilitarian object to living co-inhabitant.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies181, Article 103128 (Jan. 2024), 15 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103128 2024

  54. [55]

    Please touch the plant on your way up the stairs

    Susan Loh and Yasu Santo. 2010. "Please touch the plant on your way up the stairs... ": for OZCHI conference 2010. InProceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction(Brisbane, Australia, November 22-26, 2010)(OZCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY,...

    work page arXiv 2010

  55. [56]

    Fabian Meder, Bilge Baytekin, Emanuela Del Dottore, Yasmine Meroz, Falk Tauber, Ian Walker, and Barbara Mazzolai. 2022. A perspective on plant robotics: from bioinspiration to hybrid systems.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics18, 1, Article 015006 (Nov. 2022), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aca198

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-3190/aca198 2022

  56. [57]

    Zara Mirmalek. 2017. Inspiring Innovation: On Low-Tech in High-Tech Development.Interactions24, 4 (June 2017), 50–55. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3085562

    work page doi:10.1145/3085562 2017

  57. [58]

    Anh Thu Nguyen, Lukas Parker, Linda Brennan, and Simon Lockrey. 2020. A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging.Journal of Cleaner Production252, Article 119792 (April 2020), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119792 2020

  58. [59]

    Valentina Nisi, Nuno Jardim Nunes, Filipe Quintal, and Mary Barreto. 2013. SINAIS from Fanal: design and evaluation of an art-inspired eco-feedback system. InProceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI(Trento, Italy, September 16-20, 2013) (CHItaly ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi....

    work page doi:10.1145/2499149.2499151 2013

  59. [60]

    Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems24, 1, Article 28 (March 2009), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02428

    work page doi:10.17705/1cais.02428 2009

  60. [61]

    Sarah Otto, Mara Strenger, Andrea Maier-Nöth, and Markus Schmid. 2021. Food packaging and sustainability – Consumer perception vs. correlated scientific facts: A review.Journal of Cleaner Production298, Article 126733 (May 2021), 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2021.126733

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2021

  61. [62]

    Lucas Pereira and Nuno Nunes. 2020. Understanding the practical issues of deploying energy monitoring and eco-feedback technology in the wild: Lesson learned from three long-term deployments.Energy Reports6 (Nov. 2020), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019. 11.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2019 2020

  62. [63]

    Lara S. G. Piccolo, Cecília Baranauskas, and Rodolfo Azevedo. 2017. A socially inspired energy feedback technology: challenges in a developing scenario.AI & SOCIETY32, 3 (Aug. 2017), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0653-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00146-016-0653-8 2017

  63. [64]

    James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2010. Materializing Energy. InProceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark, August 16-20, 2010)(DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–122. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858193

    work page doi:10.1145/1858171.1858193 2010

  64. [65]

    James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2012. Beyond Energy Monitors: Interaction, Energy, and Emerging Energy Systems. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Austin, TX, USA, May 5-10, 2012)(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207771

    work page doi:10.1145/2207676.2207771 2012

  65. [66]

    James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2012. The local energy indicator: designing for wind and solar energy systems in the home. InProceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, June 11-15, 2012)(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 631–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318050

    work page doi:10.1145/2317956.2318050 2012

  66. [67]

    Fabio Pittarello and Lorenzo Brutti. 2019. A public tangible interface for engaging and informing young citizens about climate change. InProceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays(Palermo, Italy, June 12-14, 2019)(PerDis ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324938

    work page doi:10.1145/3321335.3324938 2019

  67. [68]

    Fabian Plichta, Annett Mitschick, Konstantin Klamka, and Raimund Dachselt. 2023. Growing Green Habits: Unobtrusive Gamified Eco-Feedback to Motivate Sustainable Behavior. InProceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2023(Rapperswil, Switzerland, September 3-6, 2023)(MuC ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1145...

    work page doi:10.1145/3603555.3608544 2023

  68. [69]

    Isabel P. S. Qamar, Katarzyna Stawarz, Simon Robinson, Alix Goguey, Céline Coutrix, and Anne Roudaut. 2020. Morphino: A Nature- Inspired Tool for the Design of Shape-Changing Interfaces. InProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, The Netherlands, July 6-10, 2020)(DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yo...

    work page doi:10.1145/3357236.3395453 2020

  69. [70]

    Filipe Quintal, Augusto Esteves, Fábio Caires, Vítor Baptista, and Pedro Mendes. 2019. Wattom: A Consumption and Grid Aware Smart Plug with Mid-air Controls. InProceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, AZ, USA, March 17-20, 2019)(TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY...

    work page doi:10.1145/3294109.3295642 2019

  70. [71]

    Filipe Quintal, Clinton Jorge, Valentina Nisi, and Nuno Nunes. 2016. Watt-I-See: A Tangible Visualization of Energy. InProceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces(Bari, Italy, June 7-10, 2016)(A VI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2909270

    work page doi:10.1145/2909132.2909270 2016

  71. [72]

    He Ren and Eva Hornecker. 2021. Comparing Understanding and Memorization in Physicalization and VR Visualization. InProceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Salzburg, Austria, February 14-17, 2021)(TEI 30•Bouzekri and Riviere ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. htt...

    work page doi:10.1145/3430524.3442446 2021

  72. [73]

    Thomas Rist, Steffen Wendzel, Masood Masoodian, and Elisabeth André. 2012. Next-Generation Home Automation Systems. InTechniken für Menschen im nächsten Jahrzehnt – Beiträge zum Usability Day X(Dornbirn, Austria, June 1, 2012). PABST Science Publishers, Lengerich, Germany, 80–87

    2012

  73. [74]

    Kim Sauvé, Saskia Bakker, and Steven Houben. 2020. Econundrum: Visualizing the Climate Impact of Dietary Choice through a Shared Data Sculpture. InProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(Eindhoven, The Netherlands, July 6-10, 2020) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1287–1300. https://doi.org/10...

    work page doi:10.1145/3357236.3395509 2020

  74. [75]

    Kluckner, and Manfred Tscheligi

    Johann Schrammel, Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Astrid Weiss, Patricia M. Kluckner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. FORE-Watch – the Clock That Tells You When to Use: Persuading Users to Align Their Energy Consumption with Green Power Availability. InProceedings of the Second International Conference on Ambient Intelligence(Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 16-18...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25167-2_19 2011

  75. [76]

    Olivia Seow, Cedric Honnet, Simon Perrault, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2022. Pudica: A Framework For Designing Augmented Human-Flora Interaction. InAugmented Humans 2022(Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, March 13-15, 2022)(AHs ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519391.3519394

    work page doi:10.1145/3519391.3519394 2022

  76. [77]

    Six Silberman, Lisa Nathan, Bran Knowles, Roy Bendor, Adrian Clear, Maria Håkansson, Tawanna Dillahunt, and Jennifer Mankoff

    M. Six Silberman, Lisa Nathan, Bran Knowles, Roy Bendor, Adrian Clear, Maria Håkansson, Tawanna Dillahunt, and Jennifer Mankoff

  77. [78]

    2014), 66–69

    Next steps for sustainable HCI.Interactions21, 5 (Sept. 2014), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2651820

    work page doi:10.1145/2651820 2014

  78. [79]

    Will Simm, Maria Angela Ferrario, Adrian Friday, Peter Newman, Stephen Forshaw, Mike Hazas, and Alan Dix. 2015. Tiree Energy Pulse: Exploring Renewable Energy Forecasts on the Edge of the Grid. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18-23, 2015)(CHI ’15). Association for Comput...

    work page doi:10.1145/2702123.2702285 2015

  79. [80]

    Drew Skau, Lane Harrison, and Robert Kosara. 2015. An Evaluation of the Impact of Visual Embellishments in Bar Charts.Comput. Graph. Forum34, 3 (June 2015), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12634

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.12634 2015

  80. [81]

    Drew Skau and Robert Kosara. 2017. Readability and precision in pictorial bar charts. InProceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: Short Papers(Barcelona, Spain, June 12-16, 2017)(EuroVis ’17). Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20171139

    work page doi:10.2312/eurovisshort.20171139 2017

Showing first 80 references.