Recognition: unknown
Boson correlations are spurious for classical states
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:33 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Boson correlations in classical states arise from statistical averages over varying geometries rather than intrinsic quantum effects.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Boson correlations from quantum states with a Glauber-Sudarshan representation of their density matrix which provides a well-behaved probability distribution are a manifestation of the Simpson paradox. They are spurious correlations from statistical ensemble averages over uncorrelated measurements made in varying geometries, due to a process of symmetry-breaking as a confounding factor. Bosonic correlations encoded by the wavefunction appear to be formed in the geometry assumed, which however is not that of the statistical ensemble but varies from realization to realization.
What carries the argument
Symmetry-breaking as a confounder that varies the measurement geometry from realization to realization in an ensemble average, producing Simpson-paradox spurious correlations in the Glauber-Sudarshan P-function representation.
If this is right
- Correlations observed in classical states do not indicate nonclassicality or quantum advantage.
- The wavefunction does not encode genuine boson correlations for states with well-behaved P-functions once geometry is held constant.
- Proper characterization of nonclassicality requires separating single-realization quantum averages from ensemble statistical averages.
- Claims of bosonic bunching or antibunching in coherent or thermal light must be rechecked for confounding by geometry variation.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Experiments that enforce identical geometry in every shot could eliminate the apparent correlations in classical states and isolate true quantum effects.
- Similar confounding by uncontrolled parameters may affect other correlation measures in quantum optics.
- The result suggests testing whether fixing all auxiliary degrees of freedom removes reported nonclassical signatures in borderline classical states.
Load-bearing premise
That any observed boson correlations in these states arise purely from ensemble averaging over realizations with varying geometries rather than from an intrinsic property of the quantum state itself.
What would settle it
A measurement of second-order correlation functions on a classical state in which the experimental geometry is strictly fixed across all realizations with no symmetry breaking present, showing whether the correlations disappear or persist.
Figures
read the original abstract
We show that boson correlations from quantum states with a Glauber-Sudarshan representation of their density matrix which provides a well-behaved probability distribution -- including coherent states, thermal states, and all states that can be deemed classical -- are a manifestation of the Simpson paradox: they are spurious correlations from statistical (ensemble) averages over uncorrelated measurements made in varying geometries, due to a process of symmetry-breaking as a confounding factor. Bosonic correlations encoded by the wavefunction appear to be formed in the geometry assumed, which however is not that of the statistical ensemble but varies from realization to realization. This calls to distinguish between quantum and statistical averages and sheds new understandings on the fundamental problems of nonclassicality and quantum advantage.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that boson correlations in quantum states admitting a well-behaved positive Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation (including coherent states, thermal states, and other classically interpretable states) are not intrinsic but spurious manifestations of Simpson's paradox. These correlations arise from statistical ensemble averages over uncorrelated single-shot measurements performed in varying geometries, with symmetry-breaking acting as a confounding factor that changes the effective geometry from realization to realization. The work emphasizes the distinction between quantum and statistical averages and draws implications for nonclassicality and quantum advantage.
Significance. If the central mapping to Simpson's paradox holds rigorously, the result would offer a novel statistical reinterpretation of standard results in quantum optics, reframing apparent correlations in positive-P states as artifacts of ensemble averaging rather than properties of the state itself. This could sharpen the conceptual boundary between classical and nonclassical light and provide a fresh angle on the origins of quantum advantage. The approach is potentially impactful if it supplies explicit derivations showing equivalence between the usual fixed-geometry P-function integrals and the proposed confounded averages.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that correlations in positive-P states are spurious due to symmetry-breaking as a confounder requires an explicit demonstration that the standard Glauber-Sudarshan integral (which already yields, e.g., g^{(2)}(0)=2 for a thermal state with fixed mode operators) is mathematically equivalent to an average over realizations with randomly varying geometries. Without this reduction shown, the Simpson-paradox reinterpretation rests on an additional assumption rather than following directly from the P-representation.
- [Main derivation] Main derivation (implied in the abstract's symmetry-breaking mechanism): The assertion that symmetry-breaking necessarily varies the geometry across the ensemble must be shown to be required for the observed correlations; the standard fixed-geometry calculation already reproduces the classical correlations without invoking per-realization geometric variation, so the paper needs to derive why the usual result is incomplete or equivalent to the confounded case.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it named the specific correlation functions under discussion (e.g., g^{(2)}(r) or higher-order) and briefly indicated the concrete mapping to Simpson's paradox.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thoughtful and detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our central claim. We agree that the link between the standard Glauber-Sudarshan integrals and the ensemble averages over varying geometries requires explicit demonstration, and we have revised the manuscript to supply the missing derivations while preserving the original interpretation.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that correlations in positive-P states are spurious due to symmetry-breaking as a confounder requires an explicit demonstration that the standard Glauber-Sudarshan integral (which already yields, e.g., g^{(2)}(0)=2 for a thermal state with fixed mode operators) is mathematically equivalent to an average over realizations with randomly varying geometries. Without this reduction shown, the Simpson-paradox reinterpretation rests on an additional assumption rather than following directly from the P-representation.
Authors: We accept that the original text did not contain a fully explicit reduction. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new subsection that derives the equivalence directly: the Glauber-Sudarshan integral for any normally ordered correlation function is rewritten as an expectation value over an ensemble of single-shot measurements in which the effective mode geometry fluctuates from realization to realization. For the thermal state we recover g^{(2)}(0)=2 exactly from this ensemble average, with the fluctuation arising from the phase symmetry inherent in the P-representation itself. No extra assumption is introduced; the equivalence follows from expressing the P-function integral in terms of the underlying statistical ensemble. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Main derivation] Main derivation (implied in the abstract's symmetry-breaking mechanism): The assertion that symmetry-breaking necessarily varies the geometry across the ensemble must be shown to be required for the observed correlations; the standard fixed-geometry calculation already reproduces the classical correlations without invoking per-realization geometric variation, so the paper needs to derive why the usual result is incomplete or equivalent to the confounded case.
Authors: The fixed-geometry calculation yields the correct single-realization expectation, yet experimental correlation functions are obtained from statistical averages over many independent shots. We now derive that symmetry-breaking (random phase or orientation fluctuations encoded in the P-distribution) forces the effective geometry to differ across realizations. When the ensemble average is performed with this variation, Simpson's paradox appears and reproduces the standard result. If geometry were strictly fixed for every realization, the statistical average would be uncorrelated for any classical state; the observed correlations therefore require the variation. The revised text contains the explicit proof that the usual fixed-geometry formula is recovered precisely as the confounded ensemble average. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity detected
full rationale
The paper reinterprets standard Glauber-Sudarshan averages for positive-P states (coherent, thermal) as spurious Simpson-paradox correlations arising from ensemble averaging over symmetry-broken geometries. The provided abstract and context contain no equations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The distinction between quantum and statistical averages is presented as an interpretive consequence of the P-representation rather than a definitional tautology or statistical forcing. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the standard normally-ordered correlation integrals, which already produce g^{(2)}(0)=2 for thermal states without invoking per-realization geometry variation.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption States with non-negative, well-behaved Glauber-Sudarshan P-function are classical and their correlations can be treated via statistical ensembles.
- ad hoc to paper Symmetry-breaking acts as a confounding factor that varies geometry across realizations in the ensemble.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
final geometry
for thermal states ρth = 1 (1+¯n1)(1+¯n2) P∞ µ,ν=0 ¯n1 ¯n1+1 µ ¯n2 ¯n2+1 ν |µν⟩ ⟨µν|and C|¯α⟩ ⟨¯α|≡ |α 1|2|α2|2/(|α1|2 +|α 2|2)2 for Random-Phase Coherent States (RPCS) whereα≡(α 1, α2)T and ρ|¯α⟩ ⟨¯α|=e −|α1|2−|α2|2P∞ µ,ν=0 αµ 1 αν 2 µ!ν! |µν⟩ ⟨µν|. Such a sym- metrization of the wavefunction results in correlations from various quantum states for the vo...
-
[2]
& Lee, Y.Philosophies, Puzzles, and Para- doxes
Pawitan, Y. & Lee, Y.Philosophies, Puzzles, and Para- doxes. A Statistician ’s Search for Truth.(CRC Press LLC, 2024). URLhttps://openlibrary.org/isbn/ 9781032377391
2024
-
[3]
Brown, R. H. & Twiss, R. A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius.Nature178, 1046 (1956). URL doi:10.1038/1781046a0
-
[4]
Purcell, E. M. The question of correlation between pho- tons in coherent light rays.Nature178, 1449 (1956). URLdoi:10.1038/1781449a0
-
[5]
Quantum theory, the Church-Turing princi- ple and the universal quantum computer.Proc
Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing princi- ple and the universal quantum computer.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A400, 97 (1985). URLdoi:10.1098/rspa.1985. 0070
-
[6]
Glauber, R. J. The quantum theory of optical coher- ence.Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963). URLdoi:10.1103/ PhysRev.130.2529
1963
-
[7]
Hanbury Brown, R. & Twiss, R. Q. Correlation between photons in two coherent beams of light.Nature177, 27 (1956). URLdoi:10.1038/177027a0
-
[8]
Glauber, R. J. Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field.Phys. Rev.131, 2766 (1963). URLdoi: 10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766
-
[9]
Sudarshan, E. C. G. Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams.Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 277 (1963). URLdoi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277
-
[10]
Mandel, L. & Wolf, E. Photon correlations.Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 276 (1963). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 10.276
-
[11]
Zubizarreta Casalengua, E. & Laussy, F. P. Spatial cor- relations of vortex quantum states.arXiv:2402.01627 (2024). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01627
-
[12]
Fowler, Matteo Mariantoni, John M
Xu, J. Quantifying coherence of Gaussian states.Phys. Rev. A93, 032111 (2016). URLdoi:10.1103/physreva. 93.032111
-
[13]
Salazar, D. E. & Laussy, F. P. Bosons from classical states are not correlated – supplementary material
-
[14]
The interpretation of interaction in con- tingency tables.J
Simpson, E. The interpretation of interaction in con- tingency tables.J. R. Stat. Soc. B: Stat. Methodol. 13, 238 (1951). URLdoi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951. tb00088.x
-
[15]
Homogeneity of subpopulations and Simpson’s paradox.J
Mittal, Y. Homogeneity of subpopulations and Simpson’s paradox.J. Am. Stat. Assoc.86, 167 (1991). URLdoi: 10.1080/01621459.1991.10475016
-
[16]
Pearson, K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.60, 489 (1897). URLdoi:10.1098/ rspl.1896.0076
-
[17]
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D. & Schack, R. An intro- duction to qbism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics.Am. J. Phys.82, 749 (2014). URL doi:10.1119/1.4874855
-
[18]
Good, I. & Mittal, Y. The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables.Ann. Stat.15, 694 (1987). URLdoi:10.1214/aos/1176350369
-
[19]
& Conti, C
Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G. & Conti, C. Large-scale pho- tonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 213902 (2019). URLdoi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.213902
2019
-
[20]
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G. & Plenio, M. B. Quantum coherence as a resource.Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017). URLdoi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.041003
-
[21]
L¨ uders, C.et al.Quantifying quantum coherence in po- lariton condensates.Phys. Rev. X Quantum2, 030320 (2021). URLdoi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030320
-
[22]
Brune, Y.et al.Quantum coherence of a long-lifetime exciton-polariton condensate.Commun. Mater.6, 123 (2025). URLdoi:10.1038/s43246-025-00848-6
-
[23]
Brune, Y., Cizauskas, M. & Assmann, M. Quantum re- source theory of lasers.Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013170 (2026). URLdoi:10.1103/nchs-mvlw
-
[24]
Optical coherence: A convenient fiction
Mølmer, K. Optical coherence: A convenient fiction. Phys. Rev. A55, 3195 (1997). URLdoi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.55.3195
1997
-
[25]
p-Adic Models of Ultrametric Diffusion Constrained by Hierarchical En- ergy Landscapes
Drummond, P. & Gardiner, C. GeneralisedP- representations in quantum optics.J. Phys. A.: Math. Gen.13, 2353 (1980). URLdoi:10.1088/0305-4470/ 13/7/018
-
[26]
Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks
McKeever, T. & Nazir, A. An introduction to the foundations and interpretations of quantum mechanics. arXiv:2603.09818(2026). URLdoi:10.48550/arXiv. 2603.09818. S1 Boson correlations are spurious for classical states Supplementary Material Daniel E. Salazar 1 and Fabrice P. Laussy1,∗ 1Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC), 28049 Madrid,...
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026
-
[27]
The normalization isZ 2 =C 20 + 2C11 +C 02, so thateρ (2)(r1,r 2) =ρ (2)(r1,r 2)/Z2
cos ∆θ i ,(S84) with ∆θ=θ 2 −θ 1. The normalization isZ 2 =C 20 + 2C11 +C 02, so thateρ (2)(r1,r 2) =ρ (2)(r1,r 2)/Z2. The corresponding distance distribution is given by Eq. (S56). Since Eq. (S84) depends only on the relative angle, one obtains D(d) = 2 πZ2 Z ∞ 0 dr1 r1e−r2 1 Z ∞ 0 dr2 r2e−r2 2 Z 2π 0 d∆θ × h C20 r2 1r2 2 +C 02 (1−r 2 1)2(1−r 2 2)2 +C 11...
-
[28]
cos ∆θ i ×δ d− q r2 1 +r 2 2 −2r 1r2 cos ∆θ .(S85) S16 FIG. S6. A 5×5 grid of single-shot patterns for the Fock state|1,1⟩in the quadrupolar vortex basisℓ=±2. In each panel, the first position is sampled from the one-particle density matrix and the second from the corresponding conditional two-particle density matrix; both sampled positions are marked in ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.