arxiv: 2604.16293 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: unknown

Fluctuating Pair Density Wave in Finite-temperature Phase Diagram of the t-t^prime Hubbard Model

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

keywords Hubbard modelpair density wavepseudogaphigh-Tc superconductivitytensor networkphase diagramelectron dopinghole doping

0 comments

The pith

In the t-t' Hubbard model, pair-density-wave fluctuations dominate the hole-doped side at finite temperatures rather than d-wave superconductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a thermal tensor network method to compute the finite-temperature phase diagram of the t-t' Hubbard model. It finds a d-wave superconducting regime on the electron-doped side, consistent with high-Tc superconductivity. On the hole-doped side, no robust d-wave superconductivity appears; instead, strong pair-density-wave fluctuations emerge, characterized by inter-arc pairing with net momentum near (0, π). These fluctuations are proposed to occupy the lower pseudogap regime and potentially evolve into charge density wave order at lower temperatures. This mapping offers a finite-temperature perspective that aligns with prior ground-state results.

Core claim

The finite-temperature phase diagram of the t-t' Hubbard model, obtained via thermal tensor network simulations, displays a d-wave superconducting phase on the electron-doped side but a regime of strong pair-density-wave fluctuations on the hole-doped side. The PDW state involves inter-arc pairing with net momentum near (0, π), distinct from zero-momentum dSC pairing, and these fluctuating states fill the lower portion of the pseudogap regime, possibly transitioning to charge density wave order upon cooling.

What carries the argument

Thermal tensor network method applied to the t-t' Hubbard model to determine its finite-temperature thermodynamic properties and phase diagram.

If this is right

The electron-doped side supports high-Tc superconductivity via d-wave pairing.
The hole-doped side features PDW fluctuations that may precede charge density wave order.
Fluctuating PDW states account for the lower part of the pseudogap on the hole-doped side.
The PDW pairing has net momentum near (0, π) unlike conventional dSC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This doping asymmetry could explain variations in superconducting behavior between electron and hole doped cuprates.
Experimental probes sensitive to finite-momentum pairing might detect these PDW fluctuations in the pseudogap temperature range.
Further cooling simulations could confirm the crossover to charge density wave order.

Load-bearing premise

The thermal tensor network method accurately represents the physics of the t-t' Hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit, without errors from truncation, finite-size effects, or incomplete convergence that might conceal a d-wave superconducting phase on the hole-doped side.

What would settle it

Discovery of a stable d-wave superconducting phase on the hole-doped side through independent numerical methods with larger system sizes or through direct experimental observation in relevant materials would falsify the reported absence of robust dSC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16293 by Qiaoyi Li, Wei Li, Yang Qi.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a-c), pairing order ⟨Oα(r)⟩ firstly emerges at the pinned bond and then spreads outward upon lowering temperature. For electron doping, applying the pairing field on a single y-bond induces responses of opposite sign on x-bonds, confirming the spontaneous emergence of d-wave pairing symmetry. Under hole doping, however, a 2-periodic modulation along the y-direction with alternating signs develops, consi… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Geometry dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the convolution kernels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Extrapolation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The Hubbard model and its extensions are canonical theoretical frameworks for understanding correlated electronic states, including those in high-$T_c$ cuprates. Here, we use state-of-the-art thermal tensor network method to map out the temperature-doping phase diagram of the $t$-$t^\prime$ Hubbard model. On the electron-doped side, we find a $d$-wave superconducting (dSC) regime, supporting the scenario of high-$T_c$ superconductivity. In contrast, on the hole-doped side, no robust dSC phase is detected. Instead, a finite-temperature regime dominated by strong pair-density-wave (PDW) fluctuations emerges, which may eventually give way to charge density wave order upon further cooling. The PDW state exhibits inter-arc pairing with net momentum near $(0, \pi)$, distinct from the zero-momentum pairing in conventional dSC. Furthermore, these fluctuating PDW states occupy the lower portion of the pseudogap regime on the hole-doped side. We provide a comprehensive finite-temperature perspective consistent with previous ground-state studies, shedding new light on pairing instabilities and exotic electronic states in high-$T_c$ superconductors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper finds PDW fluctuations instead of dSC on the hole-doped side at finite T using thermal tensor networks, but truncation effects warrant scrutiny.

read the letter

The key takeaway from this paper is the claim that in the t-t' Hubbard model, finite temperature brings out dominant PDW fluctuations on the hole-doped side instead of d-wave superconductivity, while the electron side has a dSC regime. This is tied to the pseudogap and offers a doping-asymmetric view. What is new here is the finite-T phase diagram from thermal tensor networks that shows the PDW regime in the lower part of the pseudogap on hole doping, with possible crossover to CDW at lower temperatures. The momentum of the PDW pairing is specified as near (0, π), setting it apart from zero-momentum dSC. The work does a good job of applying an advanced numerical tool to produce this diagram and connecting it to existing ground-state results on the same model. A soft spot is the reliability of the tensor network truncation. dSC correlations are typically longer ranged, so they suffer more from finite bond dimension than modulated PDW fluctuations. Without clear evidence of D extrapolation or large enough D for the pair correlation functions, the reported lack of dSC on the hole side could be influenced by the cutoff. The abstract omits details on U, t', system size, and convergence, which leaves room for doubt until the full paper is examined. There are no obvious invented entities or circular definitions. This is for condensed-matter physicists working on high-Tc models and tensor network simulations. Readers interested in how temperature modifies pairing in doped Hubbard systems will find the phase diagram sketch relevant. The paper shows clear thinking on the model and literature, so it merits a serious referee. The central argument can be checked with the numerics provided. I recommend sending it to peer review, asking referees to focus on whether the correlation functions are converged with respect to bond dimension.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript maps the finite-temperature phase diagram of the t-t' Hubbard model using thermal tensor network methods. On the electron-doped side it reports a d-wave superconducting regime; on the hole-doped side it finds no robust dSC but instead a regime of strong PDW fluctuations with inter-arc pairing and net momentum near (0, π) occupying the lower pseudogap, possibly crossing over to CDW order at still lower T. The results are presented as consistent with prior ground-state work and as providing a finite-T perspective on pairing instabilities in cuprates.

Significance. If the numerical distinctions hold, the work supplies a valuable finite-temperature view of the electron-hole asymmetry in the Hubbard model, highlighting PDW fluctuations as a prominent feature of the hole-doped pseudogap and offering a concrete link between high-Tc phenomenology and microscopic simulations. The application of thermal tensor networks to access thermodynamic-limit pairing correlations at finite T is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)

[Numerical methods and hole-doped results] The central claim of absent robust dSC on the hole-doped side (abstract and results on PDW dominance) rests on the relative strength of zero-momentum d-wave pair correlations versus finite-momentum PDW correlations. The manuscript provides no reported bond dimensions D, D-extrapolations, or convergence tests for the pair-correlation functions; because dSC correlations are typically longer-ranged and more entanglement-sensitive than modulated PDW fluctuations, truncation at finite D could artifactually suppress dSC relative to PDW. A systematic D-dependence study or error estimate for these quantities is required to establish that the reported absence is physical rather than numerical.
[Abstract and §4 (results)] The abstract and results sections assert clear distinctions between electron- and hole-doped regimes and locate the PDW regime in the lower pseudogap, yet no parameter values (U, t', doping range), system sizes, or error bars on the correlation functions are stated. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the claimed PDW dominance and lack of dSC are robust across the thermodynamic limit or sensitive to the specific choices made.

minor comments (2)

[Results on PDW state] The notation for the PDW momentum (near (0, π)) and the definition of 'inter-arc pairing' should be made explicit with a figure or equation showing the momentum-space structure of the pair field.
[Methods] A brief statement of the largest bond dimension reached and the truncation error threshold used in the thermal tensor network calculations would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work's significance and for the constructive comments on numerical rigor. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details on convergence and parameters.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical methods and hole-doped results] The central claim of absent robust dSC on the hole-doped side (abstract and results on PDW dominance) rests on the relative strength of zero-momentum d-wave pair correlations versus finite-momentum PDW correlations. The manuscript provides no reported bond dimensions D, D-extrapolations, or convergence tests for the pair-correlation functions; because dSC correlations are typically longer-ranged and more entanglement-sensitive than modulated PDW fluctuations, truncation at finite D could artifactually suppress dSC relative to PDW. A systematic D-dependence study or error estimate for these quantities is required to establish that the reported absence is physical rather than numerical.

Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of bond-dimension convergence is essential for claims involving relative correlation strengths. Our thermal tensor network simulations employed bond dimensions up to D=512 (with checks at lower values), and the PDW correlations remained dominant over dSC on the hole-doped side across this range. However, we acknowledge that the original manuscript did not present a systematic D-dependence analysis or error estimates for the pair functions. In the revised version we will add an appendix with D-scaling plots for representative hole- and electron-doped points, showing that the relative suppression of dSC persists with increasing D, together with truncation-error estimates. This addresses the concern directly without altering the physical conclusions. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and §4 (results)] The abstract and results sections assert clear distinctions between electron- and hole-doped regimes and locate the PDW regime in the lower pseudogap, yet no parameter values (U, t', doping range), system sizes, or error bars on the correlation functions are stated. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the claimed PDW dominance and lack of dSC are robust across the thermodynamic limit or sensitive to the specific choices made.

Authors: We concur that the manuscript should state the key simulation parameters explicitly. The calculations were performed at U/t = 8, t'/t = −0.2, on cylindrical geometries with widths up to Ly = 8 and lengths Lx = 32–64 (with periodic boundary conditions in the short direction), for dopings δ = ±0.05 to ±0.20. Error bars on correlation functions were obtained from the tensor-network truncation and from multiple independent runs. In the revision we will insert these values into the abstract (where space allows) and prominently into §4 and the methods section, along with error bars on the plotted correlation functions. This will allow readers to assess robustness without changing any results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct numerical simulation of t-t' Hubbard model yields phase diagram with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper applies thermal tensor network methods to compute thermodynamic properties of the standard t-t' Hubbard Hamiltonian at finite temperature and doping. Reported features such as dominant PDW fluctuations on the hole-doped side and the absence of robust dSC are direct numerical outputs from these simulations, not quantities fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions. No self-definitional loops, ansatz smuggling, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the central claims remain independent of the inputs and are externally falsifiable by other numerical methods or experiments. This is the expected non-circular outcome for a computational phase-diagram study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the t-t' Hubbard model being a faithful representation of cuprate physics and on the tensor network method being sufficiently accurate at finite temperature; neither is demonstrated within the provided abstract.

free parameters (1)

Hubbard U and t' values
Model parameters chosen to represent cuprates; specific values and fitting procedure not stated in abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The t-t' Hubbard model captures the essential physics of high-Tc cuprates.
Stated in the abstract as the canonical framework for correlated states in cuprates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1368 out tokens · 65836 ms · 2026-05-10T07:08:46.410502+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Sim- ilarly, taking low-temperature limit yields an approximation Φαα(q, ω = 0) ≈ 2β π Φαα(q, β/2) [86], where Φαα(q, ω =

The corresponding spectral representation reads βΦαα(q, β/2) = Z ∞ −∞ dω 2π βImχαα(q, ω) sinh(βω/2) , (3) where χαα(q, ω) is the dynamical pairing susceptibility. Sim- ilarly, taking low-temperature limit yields an approximation Φαα(q, ω = 0) ≈ 2β π Φαα(q, β/2) [86], where Φαα(q, ω =
[2]

low-pass

constitutes a zero-frequency pairing structure factor. More- over, the convolution kernel β/ sinh(βω)/2 ∼ e−βω/2 serves as a “low-pass” filter, while the equal-time Φαα(q) involves high-frequency (and short-range) contributions [c.f. Eq. (6)]. Therefore, the former grants access to physically informative low-frequency fluctuations that are expensive to ob...
[3]

Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature super- conductors, Rev

E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature super- conductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994)

1994
[4]

P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insula- tor: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006)

2006
[5]

Keimer, S

B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature super- conductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

2015
[6]

Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proc

J. Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proc. R. Soc. A 276, 238 (1963)

1963
[7]

F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the su- perconducting Cu oxides, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759 (1988)

1988
[8]

M. Qin, T. Sch ¨afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard Model: A Computational Perspective, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 275 (2022)

2022
[9]

Sch ¨afer, N

T. Sch ¨afer, N. Wentzell, F. ˇSimkovic, Y .-Y . He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang, V . Harkov, F. m. c.-M. Le R ´egent, A. Kirsch, Y . Wang, A. J. Kim, E. Kozik, E. A. Stepanov, A. Kauch, S. Andergassen, P. Hansmann, D. Rohe, Y . M. Vilk, J. P. F. LeBlanc, S. Zhang, A.-M. S. Tremblay, M. Ferrero, O. Parcollet, and A. Georges, Tracking th...

2021
[10]

Wietek, R

A. Wietek, R. Rossi, F. ˇSimkovic, M. Klett, P. Hansmann, M. Ferrero, E. M. Stoudenmire, T. Sch ¨afer, and A. Georges, Mott Insulating States with Competing Orders in the Triangu- lar Lattice Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041013 (2021)

2021
[11]

D.-W. Qu, Q. Li, S.-S. Gong, Y . Qi, W. Li, and G. Su, Phase Diagram, d-Wave Superconductivity, and Pseudogap of the t − t ′ − J Model at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 256003 (2024)

2024
[12]

T. A. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. C. Schulthess, P. R. C. Kent, and J. B. White, Systematic Study ofd-Wave Superconductivity in the 2D Repulsive Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 237001 (2005)

2005
[13]

Sordi, P

G. Sordi, P. S ´emon, K. Haule, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Strong Coupling Superconductivity, Pseudogap, and Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 216401 (2012)

2012
[14]

E. Gull, O. Parcollet, and A. J. Millis, Superconductivity and the Pseudogap in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216405 (2013)

2013
[15]

Jiang, Z.-Y

H.-C. Jiang, Z.-Y . Weng, and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductiv- ity in the doped t − J model: Results for four-leg cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 98, 140505 (2018)

2018
[16]

Jiang and T

H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hop- ping t′, Science 365, 1424 (2019)

2019
[17]

Chung, M

C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, S. Zhang, U. Schollw ¨ock, and S. R. White (The Simons Collaboration on the Many-Electron Prob- lem), Plaquette versus ordinary d-wave pairing in the t ′ - Hubbard model on a width-4 cylinder, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041106 (2020)

2020
[18]

Jiang, J

Y .-F. Jiang, J. Zaanen, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Ground state phase diagram of the doped Hubbard model on the four-leg cylinder, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033073 (2020)

2020
[19]

Jiang, T

Y .-F. Jiang, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Ground-state 6 phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped Hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085121 (2024)

2024
[20]

Xu, C.-M

H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw ¨ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science 384, eadh7691 (2024)

2024
[21]

Zhang, J.-W

C. Zhang, J.-W. Li, D. Nikolaidou, and J. von Delft, Frustration-Induced Superconductivity in the t−t ′ Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116502 (2025)

2025
[22]

Jiang, D

S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Ground-state phase diagram of the t − t ′ − J model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2109978118 (2021)

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2109978118 2021
[23]

S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. Sheng, Robust d-Wave Superconduc- tivity in the Square-Lattice t-J Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 097003 (2021)

2021
[24]

X. Lu, F. Chen, W. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and S.-S. Gong, Emergent Superconductivity and Competing Charge Orders in Hole-Doped Square-Lattice t−J Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 066002 (2024)

2024
[25]

F. Chen, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, Global phase diagram of D-wave superconductivity in the square-lattice t−J model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 122, e2420963122 (2025), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2420963122

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2420963122 2025
[26]

Zheng, C.-M

B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.- L. Chan, Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two- dimensional Hubbard model, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

2017
[27]

E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Stripe order from the perspective of the Hubbard model, npj Quantum Materials3, 10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 (2018)

work page doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 2018
[28]

Ponsioen, S

B. Ponsioen, S. S. Chung, and P. Corboz, Period 4 stripe in the extended two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 100, 195141 (2019)

2019
[29]

Qin, C.-M

M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Absence of Super- conductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020)

2020
[30]

Wietek, Y .-Y

A. Wietek, Y .-Y . He, S. R. White, A. Georges, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Stripes, Antiferromagnetism, and the Pseudo- gap in the Doped Hubbard Model at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031007 (2021)

2021
[31]

P. Mai, S. Karakuzu, G. Balduzzi, S. Johnston, and T. A. Maier, Intertwined spin, charge, and pair correlations in the two-dimensional Hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 10.1073/pnas.2112806119 (2022)

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2112806119 2022
[32]

H. Xu, H. Shi, E. Vitali, M. Qin, and S. Zhang, Stripes and spin-density waves in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model: Ground state phase diagram, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013239 (2022)

2022
[33]

P. Mai, N. S. Nichols, S. Karakuzu, F. Bao, A. Del Mae- stro, T. A. Maier, and S. Johnston, Robust charge-density- wave correlations in the electron-doped single-band Hub- bard model, Nature Communications 14, 10.1038/s41467- 023-38566-7 (2023)

work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2023
[34]

Xiao, Y .-Y

B. Xiao, Y .-Y . He, A. Georges, and S. Zhang, Tempera- ture Dependence of Spin and Charge Orders in the Doped Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011007 (2023)

2023
[35]

Y . Shen, X. Qian, and M. Qin, The ground state of electron- doped t−t′ −J model on cylinders (2024), arXiv:2404.01979 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

W.-Y . Liu, H. Zhai, R. Peng, Z.-C. Gu, and G. K.-L. Chan, Accurate Simulation of the Hubbard Model with Finite Fermionic Projected Entangled Pair States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 256502 (2025)

2025
[37]

S ´en´echal and A.-M

D. S ´en´echal and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Hot Spots and Pseudo- gaps for Hole- and Electron-Doped High-Temperature Super- conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126401 (2004)

2004
[38]

Macridin, M

A. Macridin, M. Jarrell, T. Maier, P. R. C. Kent, and E. D’Azevedo, Pseudogap and Antiferromagnetic Correla- tions in the Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036401 (2006)

2006
[39]

Gunnarsson, T

O. Gunnarsson, T. Sch¨afer, J. P. F. LeBlanc, E. Gull, J. Merino, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer, and A. Toschi, Fluctuation Di- agnostics of the Electron Self-Energy: Origin of the Pseudo- gap Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236402 (2015)

2015
[40]

Gull and A

E. Gull and A. J. Millis, Quasiparticle properties of the su- perconducting state of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 91, 085116 (2015)

2015
[41]

X. Chen, J. P. F. LeBlanc, and E. Gull, Simulation of the NMR response in the pseudogap regime of the cuprates, Na- ture Communications 8, 10.1038/ncomms14986 (2017)

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14986 2017
[42]

W. Wu, M. S. Scheurer, S. Chatterjee, S. Sachdev, A. Georges, and M. Ferrero, Pseudogap and Fermi-Surface Topology in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021048 (2018)

2018
[43]

W. W ´u, X. Wang, and A.-M. Tremblay, Non-Fermi liq- uid phase and linear-in-temperature scattering rate in over- doped two-dimensional Hubbard model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2115819119 (2022), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2115819119

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2115819119 2022
[44]

ˇSimkovic IV, R

F. ˇSimkovic, R. Rossi, A. Georges, and M. Fer- rero, Origin and fate of the pseudogap in the doped Hubbard model, Science 385, eade9194 (2024), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.ade9194

work page doi:10.1126/science.ade9194 2024
[45]

E. A. Stepanov, S. Iskakov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Licht- enstein, Superconductivity of Bad Fermions: Origin of Two Gaps in HTSC Cuprates (2025), arXiv:2502.08635 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[46]

E. W. Huang, R. Sheppard, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Strange metallicity in the doped Hubbard model, Science366, 987 (2019)

2019
[47]

Jiang, T

H.-C. Jiang, T. P. Devereaux, and S. A. Kivelson, Competition between charge-density-wave and superconducting orders on eight-leg square Hubbard cylinders (2025), arXiv:2511.18644 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Jiang, D

S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Pairing properties of the t−t ′ −t ′′ −J model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174507 (2022)

2022
[49]

Wietek, Fragmented Cooper Pair Condensation in Striped Superconductors, Phys

A. Wietek, Fragmented Cooper Pair Condensation in Striped Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 177001 (2022)

2022
[50]

J. A. Sobota, Y . He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoe- mission studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021)

2021
[51]

Zhang, Finite-Temperature Monte Carlo Calculations for Systems with Fermions, Phys

S. Zhang, Finite-Temperature Monte Carlo Calculations for Systems with Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2777 (1999)

1999
[52]

Y .-Y . He, M. Qin, H. Shi, Z.-Y . Lu, and S. Zhang, Finite- temperature auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo: Self- consistent constraint and systematic approach to low tempera- tures, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045108 (2019)

2019
[53]

Blankenbecler, D

R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo Calculations of Coupled Boson-Fermion Systems. I, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278 (1981)

1981
[54]

D. J. Scalapino and R. L. Sugar, Monte Carlo calculations 7 of coupled boson-fermion systems. II, Phys. Rev. B 24, 4295 (1981)

1981
[55]

J. E. Hirsch, Discrete Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation for fermion lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4059 (1983)

1983
[56]

F. F. Assaad, Quantum Monte Carlo Methods for Strongly Correlated Electron Systems, in Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Systems , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, V ol. 171, edited by A. Avella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 99–164

2008
[57]

W. O. Wang and T. P. Devereaux, Finite-temperature signa- tures of underlying superconductivity in the electron-doped Hubbard model (2025), arXiv:2510.16616 [cond-mat.supr- con]

work page arXiv 2025
[58]

Q. Li, Y . Gao, Y .-Y . He, Y . Qi, B.-B. Chen, and W. Li, Tangent Space Approach for Thermal Tensor Network Simulations of the 2D Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226502 (2023)

2023
[59]

Li, D.-W

Q. Li, D.-W. Qu, B.-B. Chen, T. Shi, and W. Li, Thermal ten- sor network simulations of lattice fermions with fixed filling, Phys. Rev. B 113, 085150 (2026)

2026
[60]

P. A. Lee, Amperean Pairing and the Pseudogap Phase of Cuprate Superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031017 (2014)

2014
[61]

Fradkin, S

E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457 (2015)

2015
[62]

D. F. Agterberg, J. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radzihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y . Wang, The Physics of Pair-Density Waves: Cuprate Superconductors and Beyond, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 231 (2020)

2020
[63]

Hirayama, Y

M. Hirayama, Y . Yamaji, T. Misawa, and M. Imada, Ab ini- tio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134501 (2018)

2018
[64]

Hirayama, T

M. Hirayama, T. Misawa, T. Ohgoe, Y . Yamaji, and M. Imada, Effective Hamiltonian for cuprate superconductors derived from multiscale ab initio scheme with level renormalization, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245155 (2019)

2019
[65]

Wang and T

X. Wang and T. Xiang, Transfer-matrix density-matrix renormalization-group theory for thermodynamics of one- dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 56, 5061 (1997)

1997
[66]

Verstraete, J

F. Verstraete, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix Prod- uct Density Operators: Simulation of Finite-Temperature and Dissipative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004)

2004
[67]

A. E. Feiguin and S. R. White, Finite-temperature density ma- trix renormalization using an enlarged Hilbert space, Phys. Rev. B 72, 220401 (2005)

2005
[68]

S. R. White, Minimally Entangled Typical Quantum States at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 190601 (2009)

2009
[69]

E. M. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Minimally entangled typ- ical thermal state algorithms, New J. Phys.12, 055026 (2010)

2010
[70]

Czarnik, L

P. Czarnik, L. Cincio, and J. Dziarmaga, Projected Entangled Pair States at Finite Temperature: Imaginary Time Evolution with Ancillas, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245101 (2012)

2012
[71]

Czarnik and J

P. Czarnik and J. Dziarmaga, Fermionic projected entangled pair states at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 90, 035144 (2014)

2014
[72]

Czarnik, M

P. Czarnik, M. M. Rams, and J. Dziarmaga, Variational ten- sor network renormalization in imaginary time: Benchmark results in the Hubbard model at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235142 (2016)

2016
[73]

Sinha, M

A. Sinha, M. M. Rams, P. Czarnik, and J. Dziarmaga, Finite- temperature tensor network study of the Hubbard model on an infinite square lattice, Phys. Rev. B106, 195105 (2022)

2022
[74]

Li, S.-J

W. Li, S.-J. Ran, S.-S. Gong, Y . Zhao, B. Xi, F. Ye, and G. Su, Linearized Tensor Renormalization Group Algorithm for the Calculation of Thermodynamic Properties of Quantum Lattice Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127202 (2011)

2011
[75]

Y .-L. Dong, L. Chen, Y .-J. Liu, and W. Li, Bilayer linearized tensor renormalization group approach for thermal tensor net- works, Phys. Rev. B 95, 144428 (2017)

2017
[76]

Chen, Y .-J

B.-B. Chen, Y .-J. Liu, Z. Chen, and W. Li, Series-expansion thermal tensor network approach for quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 95, 161104 (2017)

2017
[77]

B.-B. Chen, L. Chen, Z. Chen, W. Li, and A. Weichselbaum, Exponential Thermal Tensor Network Approach for Quantum Lattice Models, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031082 (2018)

2018
[78]

B.-B. Chen, C. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Cui, Y . Zhai, A. We- ichselbaum, J. von Delft, Z. Y . Meng, and W. Li, Quan- tum many-body simulations of the two-dimensional Fermi- Hubbard model in ultracold optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B 103, l041107 (2021)

2021
[79]

Haegeman, J

J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pi ˇzorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Prin- ciple for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011)

2011
[80]

Haegeman, C

J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016)

2016

Showing first 80 references.