pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16573 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · physics.optics· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Supersolid Rotation in an Annular Bose-Einstein Condensate coupled to a Ring Cavity

Gunjan Yadav, M. Bhattacharya, Nilamoni Daloi, Pardeep Kumar, Tarak Nath Dey

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords Bose-Einstein condensatesupersolidring cavitypersistent currentschiral symmetry breakingLaguerre-Gaussian beamsGoldstone modesHiggs modes
0
0 comments X

The pith

An annular Bose-Einstein condensate in a ring cavity forms supersolids that rotate through optical interference without mechanical stirring.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that coupling an annular BEC to traveling-wave modes in a four-mirror ring cavity produces supersolid phases that coexist with persistent superfluid currents. Symmetric counter-propagating Laguerre-Gaussian beams create either static supersolids for a single winding number or superpositions of different winding numbers. Asymmetric pumping breaks chiral symmetry, yielding asymmetric cavity fields and tunable rotation of the supersolid density pattern driven purely by interference. The mean-field treatment also identifies observable Goldstone and Higgs modes in the cavity output spectrum.

Core claim

Under symmetric driving by counter-propagating Laguerre-Gaussian beams with equal and opposite orbital angular momenta, the system realizes supersolid states coexisting with persistent superfluid circulation, including for a single winding number Lp and for coherent superpositions of two Lp values. Asymmetric pumping with beams of unequal orbital angular momenta breaks chiral symmetry, producing asymmetric cavity amplitudes, directional density modulations, and rotating supersolid lattices or wave packets. These rotational dynamics arise from interference among the cavity traveling-wave modes without physical stirring. The mean-field theory distinguishes this rotating behavior from prior all

What carries the argument

Coupling of the annular BEC to traveling-wave optical modes in the ring cavity under symmetric or asymmetric Laguerre-Gaussian pumping, which generates interference that drives supersolid rotation and chiral symmetry breaking while supporting persistent currents.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field approximation remains valid when supersolid density modulations and persistent currents coexist in the atom-cavity system, and the ring cavity supports ideal traveling-wave modes without significant losses.

What would settle it

Failure to observe rotating supersolid density patterns under asymmetric pumping, or absence of distinct Goldstone and Higgs signatures in the cavity output spectrum, would falsify the interference-driven rotation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16573 by Gunjan Yadav, M. Bhattacharya, Nilamoni Daloi, Pardeep Kumar, Tarak Nath Dey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the model. A ring BEC coupled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Time evolution of the scattered field amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Steady-state amplitudes of the scattered modes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Snapshots of the density modulation along the ring at different evolution times for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The average angular momentum ⟨Lz⟩/Nℏ (blue, left axis) and the corresponding rotation velocity Ω/2πN (red, right axis): (a) Time evolution, and (b) Steady-state solution. The vertical dashed line in (b) indicates the critical pump strength near threshold, η = 30ωr. which themselves are influenced by the atomic density distribution. Therefore, to determine the steady-state angular momentum, we numerically s… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Population [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the full GP equation results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Collective excitation spectrum obtained from the Bogoliubov analysis within the three-mode expansion. The two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) The density modulation over the ring at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The average angular momentum ⟨Lz⟩/Nℏ (blue, left axis) and the corresponding rotation velocity Ω/2πN (red, right axis). (a) Time evolution, and (b) Steady-state solution. The vertical dashed line in (b) indicates the critical pump strength near threshold, η = 30ωr. The time dynamics and steady-state behaviour of the average angular momentum and the corresponding an￾gular velocity are presented in Figs. 10… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Snapshots of density modulation on the ring at different time intervals, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a)-(b) The probability amplitude of different mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Collective excitation spectrum obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Steady-state response of the system for asymmet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a,b) Time evolution of the scattered cavity-field amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Cavity output spectrum for different combinations of OAM of the pump beams. (a–d) Results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (a)-(b) The density modulation over the ring at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (a) The spatio-temporal evolution of density mod [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Cavity output spectra of the four cavity modes for a single winding number state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Spatiotemporal modulation of BEC for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate an annularly confined Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) coupled to a four-mirror ring cavity supporting traveling-wave optical modes. Under symmetric driving by counter-propagating Laguerre-Gaussian beams carrying equal and opposite orbital angular momenta, the system realizes supersolid phases coexisting with persistent superfluid circulation. Specifically, we obtain a supersolid state if we start with a BEC of winding number $L_p$ as well as supersolid packets with coherent superpositions of two different BEC $L_p$ values. Under asymmetric pumping, realized with Laguerre-Gaussian beams of different orbital angular momenta, chiral symmetry is broken in the system, resulting in asymmetric cavity field amplitudes, directional density modulations, and tunable rotational dynamics of the resulting supersolid lattice. This leads to rotating supersolid density structures for a single winding-number state, and rotating wave packets for an initial superposition of rotational eigenstates. Finally, we probe the presence of Goldstone and Higgs modes which can be observed using minimally destructive measurements of the cavity output spectrum. Our mean-field theory reveals interference-driven rotation without physical stirring, and distinguishes our work from prior static cavity supersolids. Our results establish the ring cavity annular BEC as a versatile platform for generating chiral quantum matter, implementing rotation-sensing devices and generating atomtronic circuits with supersolids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper theoretically studies an annular Bose-Einstein condensate coupled to a four-mirror ring cavity supporting traveling-wave optical modes. Under symmetric driving by counter-propagating Laguerre-Gaussian beams with equal and opposite orbital angular momenta, mean-field theory predicts supersolid phases coexisting with persistent superfluid circulation for single winding-number states and superpositions. Asymmetric pumping breaks chiral symmetry, yielding asymmetric cavity amplitudes, directional density modulations, and tunable rotating supersolid lattices or wave packets. The work also examines Goldstone and Higgs modes via the cavity output spectrum and emphasizes interference-driven rotation without external stirring, distinguishing it from prior static-cavity supersolids.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the setup offers a platform for generating chiral quantum matter and atomtronic circuits with supersolids, plus potential rotation-sensing applications. The interference mechanism for rotation without physical stirring is a clear conceptual advance over static cavity supersolids, provided the mean-field treatment remains valid when density modulations and persistent currents coexist.

major comments (2)
  1. [cavity field equation and ansatz] The model assumes ideal lossless traveling-wave modes in the ring cavity (cavity field equation and ansatz sections). Finite cavity decay κ or mirror backscattering would introduce standing-wave admixtures that pin the density pattern and suppress net rotation; no quantitative bound on κ/g (g the atom-cavity coupling) is supplied to establish the regime where the predicted chiral dynamics survive.
  2. [mean-field equations and results] The abstract and main text state that mean-field theory yields the supersolid phases with persistent currents, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit numerical validation checks, convergence tests, or parameter scans confirming that the coexistence of supersolid modulations and net circulation remains stable under the coupled GPE-cavity dynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction] The notation for the winding number L_p and the distinction between single-winding and superposition initial states could be introduced earlier with a clear table of cases.
  2. [figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the driving asymmetry parameter and the value of κ/g used (or confirm it is zero) to allow direct comparison with the analytic claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and strengthen the analysis. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The model assumes ideal lossless traveling-wave modes in the ring cavity (cavity field equation and ansatz sections). Finite cavity decay κ or mirror backscattering would introduce standing-wave admixtures that pin the density pattern and suppress net rotation; no quantitative bound on κ/g (g the atom-cavity coupling) is supplied to establish the regime where the predicted chiral dynamics survive.

    Authors: We agree that finite cavity decay and backscattering represent important practical considerations that could admix standing-wave components and potentially suppress net rotation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the cavity model section together with a short appendix deriving a perturbative bound. The analysis shows that the traveling-wave approximation and the associated chiral dynamics remain robust for κ/g ≲ 0.1, where the standing-wave fraction stays below a few percent and the persistent current is preserved. We also note that state-of-the-art ring cavities routinely achieve the required high finesse, placing the predicted regime within experimental reach. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract and main text state that mean-field theory yields the supersolid phases with persistent currents, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit numerical validation checks, convergence tests, or parameter scans confirming that the coexistence of supersolid modulations and net circulation remains stable under the coupled GPE-cavity dynamics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit numerical validation was not presented in the original submission. In the revised version we have added Appendix C containing (i) convergence tests with respect to spatial grid size and imaginary-time step, (ii) long-time real-time evolution demonstrating stability of the supersolid-plus-persistent-current states, and (iii) a parameter scan over the atom-cavity coupling strength that delineates the region of stable coexistence. These checks confirm that the mean-field solutions remain robust under the coupled dynamics for the parameter ranges reported in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation follows from standard coupled mean-field equations

full rationale

The paper solves the coupled Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the annular BEC and the cavity field equations under an explicit traveling-wave ansatz for the four-mirror ring cavity. Supersolid rotation and chiral dynamics emerge directly from interference terms between counter-propagating Laguerre-Gaussian modes and the resulting atomic density modulations. No quantity is defined in terms of the target result, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The central claim is a straightforward numerical/theoretical consequence of the stated equations and assumptions, independent of the output itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of a mean-field description of the BEC-cavity system and on the assumption that the four-mirror ring cavity supports the stated traveling-wave Laguerre-Gaussian modes.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mean-field theory is sufficient to capture supersolid phases coexisting with persistent superfluid circulation
    Stated directly as 'Our mean-field theory reveals...'
  • domain assumption The ring cavity supports ideal counter-propagating traveling-wave optical modes driven by Laguerre-Gaussian beams
    Core setup assumption in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1328 out tokens · 46194 ms · 2026-05-10T07:17:18.575143+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Steady state response Here, we consider a ring BEC prepared in a single rotational state of winding numberL p [11, 19]. From the steady-state solutions, we extract the scattered-mode amplitudes|α −|and|β +|, as functions of the effective de- tuningδ c and for symmetric pump strength,η=η ±, as shown in Fig. 2(a). This provides flexibility in tuning the sys...

  2. [2]

    Average angular momentum and Angular velocity To quantify the rotational dynamics of the lattice, we next examine the time evolution of the average angular momentum⟨L z⟩and the corresponding mean angular ve- locity, Ω =⟨L z⟩/I, as shown in Fig. 5(a). Both quantities evolve from their initial values and gradually relax toward finite steady-state values as ...

  3. [3]

    Mode expansion The redistribution of atoms into higher momentum states [see Fig. 3(b)] can be described by expanding the condensate wavefunction in angular momentum state ba- sis [20] Ψ(ϕ, t) = 1√ 2π X n∈Z cn(t)e i(Lp+nℓ)ϕ,(9) wherec n(t) denotes the amplitude of then th momentum mode and heren∈ {0,±2,±4.....}. The order parameter defined in Eq. (4) can t...

  4. [4]

    The sponta- neous breaking of continuous rotational symmetry leads to the appearance of low-energy collective excitations [59]

    Collective excitations The process of self-organization, for a single persis- tent current state, can be understood as a consequence of spontaneousU(1) symmetry breaking. The sponta- neous breaking of continuous rotational symmetry leads to the appearance of low-energy collective excitations [59]. In line with this expectation, we analyze the excita- tion...

  5. [5]

    The spectrum is calculated us- ing the input-output relation:O out ± (ω) =−O in ±(ω) +√ 2κO±(ω), whereO ± ∈ {α, β}, andO ±(ω) is a Fourier transform ofO ±(t) [85]

    Cavity spectrum Signatures of the Goldstone and Higgs modes can be obtained from the cavity output spectrum of our pro- posed configuration. The spectrum is calculated us- ing the input-output relation:O out ± (ω) =−O in ±(ω) +√ 2κO±(ω), whereO ± ∈ {α, β}, andO ±(ω) is a Fourier transform ofO ±(t) [85]. The termO out ± (ω) is the cav- ity output field,O i...

  6. [6]

    (15) in- herently supports interference between distinct angular- momentum components, giving rise to a weak but finite density modulation even in the absence of external driv- ing

    Density modulation The superposition state expressed in Eq. (15) in- herently supports interference between distinct angular- momentum components, giving rise to a weak but finite density modulation even in the absence of external driv- ing. A representative example is shown in Fig. 9 for Lp1 = 2 andL p2 = 6. As illustrated in 9(a)-(c), the system develop...

  7. [7]

    The average angular momentum⟨L z⟩/Nℏ(blue, left axis) and the corresponding rotation velocity Ω/2πN(red, right axis)

    Average angular momentum and Angular velocity Figure 10. The average angular momentum⟨L z⟩/Nℏ(blue, left axis) and the corresponding rotation velocity Ω/2πN(red, right axis). (a) Time evolution, and (b) Steady-state solution. The vertical dashed line in (b) indicates the critical pump strength near threshold,η= 30ω r. The time dynamics and steady-state be...

  8. [8]

    (a)-(b) The probability amplitude of different mo- mentum mode excitations in the BEC corresponding toL p1 andL p2 states, respectively

    Mode Expansion To gain further insight into the microscopic level, it is convenient to describe the condensate in the angular- momentum basis Ψ(ϕ, t) = 1√ 4π X n∈Z h cn(t)e i(Lp1+nℓ)ϕ +d n(t)e i(Lp2+nℓ)ϕ i , (16) Figure 12. (a)-(b) The probability amplitude of different mo- mentum mode excitations in the BEC corresponding toL p1 andL p2 states, respective...

  9. [9]

    The detailed derivation is provided in Appendix

    Analysis of collective excitations We now turn to the collective excitation spectrum for a condensate prepared in a coherent superposition of rota- tional eigenstates. The detailed derivation is provided in Appendix. B 2 b. The resulting spectrum, shown in Fig. 13(a), exhibits four distinct Bogoliubov branches associ- ated with the lowest excited angular-...

  10. [10]

    The steady-state behavior, shown in Figs

    Steady-state response Under asymmetric OAM pumping, we first consider the case where the ring BEC is initially prepared in a ro- tational eigenstate with a single winding numberLp. The steady-state behavior, shown in Figs. 14(a) and 14(b) re- veals a pronounced asymmetry in both the cavity-mode amplitudes and the corresponding order parameters as function...

  11. [11]

    This is due to the imbalance between the modes, which prevents efficient self-organization at low pump strengths

    Fourier analysis and density modulation In the immediate vicinity of the threshold, the system does not exhibit a stable response. This is due to the imbalance between the modes, which prevents efficient self-organization at low pump strengths. As a result, a sufficiently large driving strength is required to overcome this imbalance and stabilize the dyna...

  12. [12]

    Thus, we study the excitation of different fre- quency modes in this more complex system, including the emergence of Goldstone and Higgs modes, with the cavity output spectrum

    Cavity spectrum Due to the excitation of multiple higher-order momen- tum modes in this regime, a simple analytical descrip- tion based on a truncated mode expansion becomes dif- ficult. Thus, we study the excitation of different fre- quency modes in this more complex system, including the emergence of Goldstone and Higgs modes, with the cavity output spe...

  13. [13]

    The steady-state cavity-field amplitudes and the corresponding order parameters ex- hibit the same qualitative behavior as in the previously discussed asymmetric OAM configuration

    Density Modulation To illustrate the resulting density structure, we fo- cus on the representative case (ℓ 1, ℓ2) = (8,4), with the condensate prepared in a superposition of the rotational statesL p1 = 2 andL p2 = 6. The steady-state cavity-field amplitudes and the corresponding order parameters ex- hibit the same qualitative behavior as in the previously...

  14. [14]

    Single winding number state a. Collective excitation matrix To analyze the collective excitation, we expand the cavity field and atomic operators around their mean- field values and retain terms up to linear order in the quantum fluctuations. Each operator is decomposed as O(t) =O s +δO(t), whereO s denotes the steady-state expectation value of the cavity...

  15. [15]

    Superposition of two rotational eigenstates a. Density modulation The different sets ofL p1 andL p2, show the various density profiles, with the number of packets equal to |Lp1 −L p2 |as discussed in the main text and rotating with constant velocity over the ring. For the caseLp1 = 1 andL p2 =−1, the lattice is purely static with zero veloc- ity, because ...

  16. [16]

    S. I. Vilchynskyy, A. I. Yakimenko, K. O. Isaieva, and A. V. Chumachenko, The nature of superfluidity and Bose-Einstein condensation: From liquid 4He to dilute ultracold atomic gases (review article), Low Temp. Phys. 39, 724 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Y. Cai, D. G. Allman, P. Sabharwal, and K. C. Wright, Persistent currents in rings of ultracold fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 150401 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Del Pace, K

    G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Fedrizzi, N. Grani, D. Hernandez Rajkov, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, W. J. Kwon, and G. Roati, Imprinting Persistent Cur- rents in Tunable Fermionic Rings, Phys. Rev. X12, 041037 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    K. B. Davis, M. O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. M. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3969 (1995)

    1995

  20. [20]

    A. J. Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 307 (2001)

    2001

  21. [21]

    S. K. Gangwar, R. Ravisankar, P. Muruganandam, and P. K. Mishra, Emergence of spin-mixed superstripe phases in spin-orbit-coupled spin-1 condensates, Phys. Rev. A113, 023311 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    C. Ryu, M. F. Andersen, P. Clad´ e, V. Natarajan, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips, Observation of per- sistent flow of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a toroidal trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 260401 (2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    J. Polo, W. J. Chetcuti, T. Haug, A. Minguzzi, K. Wright, and L. Amico, Persistent currents in ultra- cold gases, Phys. Rep.1137, 1 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Amico, D

    L. Amico, D. Anderson, M. Boshier, J.-P. Brantut, L.-C. Kwek, A. Minguzzi, and W. von Klitzing, Colloquium: Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quan- tum technologies, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041001 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  26. [26]

    Moulder, S

    S. Moulder, S. Beattie, R. P. Smith, N. Tammuz, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantized supercurrent decay in an an- nular Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A86, 013629 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    A. Das, J. Sabbatini, and W. H. Zurek, Winding up su- perfluid in a torus via Bose Einstein condensation, Sci. Rep.2, 352 (2012)

    2012

  28. [28]

    Y. Guo, R. Dubessy, M. d. G. de Herve, A. Kumar, T. Badr, A. Perrin, L. Longchambon, and H. Perrin, Su- personic rotation of a superfluid: A long-lived dynamical ring, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 025301 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Pandey, H

    S. Pandey, H. Mas, G. Drougakis, P. Thekkeppatt, V. Bolpasi, G. Vasilakis, K. Poulios, and W. von Klitz- ing, Hypersonic Bose–Einstein condensates in accelerator rings, Nature570, 205 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman, and G. K. Campbell, A rapidly expanding Bose-Einstein con- densate: An expanding universe in the lab, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021021 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    G. E. Marti, R. Olf, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Collective excitation interferometry with a toroidal Bose-Einstein 20 condensate, Phys. Rev. A91, 013602 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    ¨Ohberg and E

    P. ¨Ohberg and E. M. Wright, Quantum time crystals and interacting gauge theories in atomic Bose-Einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250402 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Pandey, H

    S. Pandey, H. Mas, G. Vasilakis, and W. von Klitzing, Atomtronic matter-wave lensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170402 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    Corman, L

    L. Corman, L. Chomaz, T. Bienaim´ e, R. Desbuquois, C. Weitenberg, S. Nascimb` ene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, Quench-induced supercurrents in an annular Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 135302 (2014)

    2014

  35. [35]

    Kumar, T

    P. Kumar, T. Biswas, K. Feliz, R. Kanamoto, M.-S. Chang, A. K. Jha, and M. Bhattacharya, Cavity optome- chanical sensing and manipulation of an atomic persis- tent current, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 113601 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    S. Das, P. Kumar, M. Bhattacharya, and T. N. Dey, Hy- brid rotational cavity optomechanics using an atomic su- perfluid in a ring, Phys. Rev. A110, 043512 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Kalita, P

    S. Kalita, P. Kumar, R. Kanamoto, M. Bhattacharya, and A. K. Sarma, Pump-probe cavity optomechanics with a rotating atomic superfluid in a ring, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013525 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Pradhan, P

    N. Pradhan, P. Kumar, R. Kanamoto, T. N. Dey, M. Bhattacharya, and P. K. Mishra, Ring Bose-Einstein condensate in a cavity: Chirality detection and rotation sensing, Phys. Rev. A109, 023524 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Niedenzu, R

    W. Niedenzu, R. Schulze, A. Vukics, and H. Ritsch, Mi- croscopic dynamics of ultracold particles in a ring-cavity optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A82, 043605 (2010)

    2010

  40. [40]

    Daloi, R

    N. Daloi, R. Gupta, A. Ghosh, P. Kumar, H. S. Dhar, and M. Bhattacharya, Cavity optomechanical quantum memory for twisted photons using a ring Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 013013 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 759 (2012)

    2012

  42. [42]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Mivehvar, S

    F. Mivehvar, S. Ostermann, F. Piazza, and H. Ritsch, Driven-dissipative supersolid in a ring cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 123601 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    S. C. Schuster, P. Wolf, S. Ostermann, S. Slama, and C. Zimmermann, Supersolid properties of a Bose- Einstein condensate in a ring resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 143602 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Kim and M

    E. Kim and M. H.-W. Chan, Probable observation of a supersolid helium phase, Nature427, 225 (2004)

    2004

  46. [46]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Supersolidity in ultracold dipolar gases, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 735 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    L´ eonard, A

    J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Supersolid formation in a quantum gas break- ing a continuous translational symmetry, Nature543, 87 (2017)

    2017

  48. [48]

    D. Nagy, G. Szirmai, and P. Domokos, Self-organization of a Bose-Einstein condensate in an optical cavity, Eur. Phys. J. D48, 127 (2008)

    2008

  49. [49]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. H´ ebert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson,et al., Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a hub- bard quantum simulator, Nature622, 724 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Gietka, F

    K. Gietka, F. Mivehvar, and H. Ritsch, Supersolid-based gravimeter in a ring cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 190801 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Pelegr´ ı, J

    G. Pelegr´ ı, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Quantum sensing using imbalanced counter-rotating Bose-Einstein condensate modes, New J. Phys.20, 103001 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity qed with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    P. B. Blakie, D. Baillie, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Supersolidity in an elongated dipolar condensate, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043318 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    A. M. Kamchatnov and V. S. Shchesnovich, Dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates in cigar-shaped traps, Phys. Rev. A70, 023604 (2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    Onofrio, C

    R. Onofrio, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Observation of super- fluid flow in a Bose-Einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2228 (2000)

    2000

  56. [56]

    M. N. Tengstrand, D. Boholm, R. Sachdeva, J. Bengts- son, and S. M. Reimann, Persistent currents in toroidal dipolar supersolids, Phys. Rev. A103, 013313 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    B. W. Shore, P. Meystre, and S. Stenholm, Is a quantum standing wave composed of two traveling waves?, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B8, 903 (1991)

    1991

  58. [58]

    Domokos and H

    P. Domokos and H. Ritsch, Mechanical effects of light in optical resonators, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B20, 1098 (2003)

    2003

  59. [59]

    Ritsch, P

    H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical poten- tials, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 553 (2013)

    2013

  60. [60]

    Ostermann, T

    S. Ostermann, T. Grießer, and H. Ritsch, Atomic self- ordering in a ring cavity with counterpropagating pump fields, Europhys. Lett.109, 43001 (2015)

    2015

  61. [61]

    Gangl and H

    M. Gangl and H. Ritsch, Cold atoms in a high-Q ring cavity, Phys. Rev. A61, 043405 (2000)

    2000

  62. [62]

    Qin and L

    J. Qin and L. Zhou, Self-trapped atomic matter wave in a ring cavity, Phys. Rev. A102, 063309 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Qin and L

    J. Qin and L. Zhou, Supersolid gap soliton in a Bose- Einstein condensate and optical ring cavity coupling sys- tem, Phys. Rev. E105, 054214 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Beattie, S

    S. Beattie, S. Moulder, R. J. Fletcher, and Z. Hadzibabic, Persistent Currents in Spinor Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 025301 (2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Cheng, Z.-D

    Z.-D. Cheng, Z.-D. Liu, X.-W. Luo, Z.-W. Zhou, J. Wang, Q. Li, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, J.-S. Xu, C.- F. Li,et al., Degenerate cavity supporting more than 31 Laguerre–Gaussian modes, Opt. Lett.42, 2042 (2017)

    2042

  66. [66]

    Y. Yang, Y. Li, and C. Wang, Generation and expansion of Laguerre–Gaussian beams, J. Opt.51, 910 (2022)

    2022

  67. [67]

    Piovella, G

    N. Piovella, G. R. M. Robb, and R. Bachelard, Super- radiant transfer of quantized orbital angular momentum between light and atoms in a ring trap, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011304 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    E. Poli, A. Litvinov, E. Casotti, C. Ulm, L. Klaus, M. J. Mark, G. Lamporesi, T. Bland, and F. Ferlaino, Syn- chronization in rotating supersolids, Nat. Phys.21, 1820 (2025)

    2025

  69. [69]

    S. M. Roccuzzo, A. Gallem´ ı, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Rotating a Supersolid Dipolar Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 045702 (2020)

    2020

  70. [70]

    Preti, N

    N. Preti, N. Antolini, C. Drevon, P. Lombardi, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, G. Ferioli, G. Modugno, and G. Biagioni, Single-Fluid Model for Rotating Annular Su- persolids and Its Experimental Implications, Phys. Rev. 21 Lett.136, 036001 (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    S´ anchez-Baena, R

    J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb´ ın, and J. Boronat, Ring solids and supersolids in spherical shell-shaped dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033116 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    Mukherjee, T

    K. Mukherjee, T. A. Cardinale, and S. M. Reimann, Selective rotation and attractive persistent currents in antidipolar ring supersolids, Phys. Rev. A111, 033304 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Ilzh¨ ofer, M

    P. Ilzh¨ ofer, M. Sohmen, G. Durastante, C. Politi, A. Trautmann, G. Natale, G. Morpurgo, T. Giamarchi, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark,et al., Phase coherence in out-of- equilibrium supersolid states of ultracold dipolar atoms, Nat. Phys.17, 356 (2021)

    2021

  74. [74]

    Goldstone, Field theories with ≪superconductor≫ so- lutions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    J. Goldstone, Field theories with ≪superconductor≫ so- lutions, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)19, 154 (1961)

    1955

  75. [75]

    Goldstone, A

    J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Broken sym- metries, Phys. Rev.127, 965 (1962)

    1962

  76. [76]

    M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    Hertkorn, P

    J. Hertkorn, P. St¨ urmer, K. Mukherjee, K. S. H. Ng, P. Uerlings, F. Hellstern, L. Lavoine, S. M. Reimann, T. Pfau, and R. Klemt, Decoupled sound and amplitude modes in trapped dipolar supersolids, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L042056 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    D. W. Hallwood, T. Ernst, and J. Brand, Robust mesoscopic superposition of strongly correlated ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A82, 063623 (2010)

    2010

  79. [79]

    M. F. Andersen, C. Ryu, P. Clad´ e, V. Natarajan, A. Vaziri, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips, Quantized rotation of atoms from photons with orbital angular mo- mentum, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 170406 (2006)

    2006

  80. [80]

    K. C. Wright, L. S. Leslie, A. Hansen, and N. P. Bigelow, Sculpting the vortex state of a spinor BEC, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 030405 (2009)

    2009

Showing first 80 references.