pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16601 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

SDSS-V LVM: Verifying what, and where, the 'Galactic Center' Lobe is

K. Kreckel , O. V. Egorov , N. Drory , G. A. Blanc , J. E. Mendez-Delgado , S. Kabanovic , D. Bizyaev , J. R. Brownstein
show 18 more authors
E. Egorova J. G. Fernandez-Trincado P. Garcia J. D. Gelfand E. J. Johnston I. Katkov J. Kollmeier F.-H. Liang K. S. Long A. Z. Lugo-Aranda A. Meija H.-W. Rix A. Roman-Lopes C. G. Roman-Zuniga N. Sattler S. F. Sanchez E. Zari R. de J. Zermeno
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Galactic Center LobeHII regionphotoionizationionized gas kinematicsSDSS-V Local Volume MapperBarnard's LoopBalmer decrement3D dust maps
0
0 comments X

The pith

New optical spectroscopy shows the Galactic Center Lobe is a foreground HII region at roughly 2 kpc, not at the galactic center.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses integral-field observations from the SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper to map ionized gas across the so-called Galactic Center Lobe. Line ratios from multiple species are consistent with photoionization by stars rather than shocks or other energetic processes. A closed outer shell appears in the least-extincted [SIII] line, and the Balmer decrement reddening matches 3D dust maps only at a distance of about 2 kpc. Kinematics are uniform across the feature, indicating it is a single coherent structure. The morphology and ionization resemble Barnard's Loop, suggesting the lobe is a nearby bubble photoionized by an embedded but off-center young cluster.

Core claim

The Galactic Center Lobe is an extended radio feature that optical integral-field spectroscopy reveals as a closed outer loop of photoionized gas. All standard line-ratio diagnostics confirm photoionization. Comparison of the observed Balmer decrement reddening with three-dimensional dust maps places the entire structure at approximately 2 kpc in the foreground, well short of the Galactic center. The [NII] velocity field is uniform, confirming the loop is a single object rather than separate components. The size, shape, and ionization structure are reminiscent of Barnard's Loop, consistent with illumination by a more distant off-center cluster.

What carries the argument

The [SIII]9532 emission-line map combined with the Balmer-decrement reddening compared against three-dimensional dust maps, which together trace morphology with minimal extinction bias and directly yield the distance constraint.

If this is right

  • The feature has no physical connection to the Galactic center and should not be used as a tracer of nuclear activity.
  • The entire structure is a single photoionized bubble rather than a composite of unrelated gas.
  • Its ionization and morphology can be explained by an off-center young stellar cluster at roughly the same distance.
  • The acronym GCL is better read as 'Greatly Confused Loop' to reflect its true location and nature.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar radio loops previously assigned to the Galactic center may also turn out to be nearby disk features once optical spectroscopy is obtained.
  • The method of combining Balmer-decrement reddening with 3D dust maps could be applied to other extended ionized structures to resolve distance ambiguities.
  • If the analogy to Barnard's Loop holds, the ionizing cluster may be detectable in infrared or X-ray surveys at the expected location behind the loop.

Load-bearing premise

That the Balmer decrement reddening can be matched to three-dimensional dust maps without large systematic errors from incomplete coverage, variable extinction, or unaccounted-for dust properties.

What would settle it

A precise distance measurement, such as a parallax or kinematic distance using a different tracer, that places any part of the ionized gas significantly farther than 2 kpc or shows strongly non-uniform velocities across the loop.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16601 by A. Meija, A. Roman-Lopes, A. Z. Lugo-Aranda, C. G. Roman-Zuniga, D. Bizyaev, E. Egorova, E. J. Johnston, E. Zari, F.-H. Liang, G. A. Blanc, H.-W. Rix, I. Katkov, J. D. Gelfand, J. E. Mendez-Delgado, J. G. Fernandez-Trincado, J. Kollmeier, J. R. Brownstein, K. Kreckel, K. S. Long, N. Drory, N. Sattler, O. V. Egorov, P. Garcia, R. de J. Zermeno, S. F. Sanchez, S. Kabanovic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Galactic Center, as seen combining optical ionized gas and radio continuum emission. 1.284 GHz radio continuum emission imaged by MeerKAT (green; Heywood et al. 2022) fills the plane, with narrow filaments extending vertically. LVM cannot directly probe the heavily extincted midplane, but bright line emission is apparent above and below, showing a variety of emission line ratios as traced by Hα (orange… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: [S iii] suffers least from extinction, and provides the most complete and accurate view of the morphology of ionized gas in the direction of the Galactic Center. The direct view of the GCL (right) traces out clearly the full structure of the lobe, as annotated and divided into subregions (left). The ‘Integrated’ full lobe (solid red line) has further been subdivided into components (red dashed lines) label… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Line emission from the integrated spectra from each GCL subregion shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Direct multi-wavelength comparison of GCL morphology between LVM optical line emission from Hα and [S iii] (top left, center), MeerKAT 1.284 GHz radio continuum (top right), mid-IR dust emission in the PAH dominated 8.0 µm (bottom left) and thermal dust 24 µm (bottom center), and 13CO molecular gas (bottom right). The morphology of the [S iii] and radio lobe agrees quite well at high galactic latitudes, an… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of Pa9/Hα/ with Hα/Hβ to place constraints on the shape of the dust extinction law. Individual fibers with modest (S/N>5; grey) and high (S/N>10; red) confidence detections of Pa9, along with the integrated measurement from GCL-1, are compared with predic￾tions from the Fitzpatrick (1999) extinction curve with a range of RV values (dotted, dashed, and solid lines). The solid line is further colo… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows Te([N ii]) as a function of [N ii]/[S ii] and [N ii]/Hα for a sample of ∼40 Galactic H ii regions, colored by their Galactocentric radius (RG). Here, the distances are taken from Méndez-Delgado et al. (2022), and based on the identi￾fication of ionizing stellar sources from Gaia that have robust parallax measurements. Each line ratio shows a correlation with Te, which we highlight by carrying out a l… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A map of the ionized gas velocity based on the [N ii] line cen￾troid, which is masked at S/N<20. The GCL (red line) shows a uni￾form velocity structure, which is offset from the b< 0 ◦ H ii regions (blue lines). obvious signs of expansion, or gradients in Galactic Longitude (which might be associated with Galactic rotation at the Galac￾tic Center), in good agreement with what has been previously reported f… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: E(B-V) reddening as a function of distance towards each of our regions (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Te as a function of Galactocentric radius (RG), for a sample of optical [N ii] (blue, Méndez-Delgado et al. 2023) and radio recombina￾tion (black, Wenger et al. 2019) line observations of H ii regions. The alternate y-axis converts these Te measurements to a metallicity con￾straint by adopting the prescription that assumes the presence of tem￾perature fluctuations (Martínez-Hernández et al. 2026). Our con… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The locations of OB stars from Zari et al. (2021) compared to the morphology of the GCL (greyscale, traced here by [S iii]). Stars with parallax distances between 1.5 and 2.5 kpc are colored by their distance (left), reddening (E(B-V), center) and effective temperature (Te f f , right). All stars with distances between 0-3 kpc are also shown in black (crosses). Interestingly, most stars avoid the center o… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Barnard’s Loop in LVM: [O iii] (left), Hα (center), [S iii] (right). Covering nearly 15◦ × 15◦ across the sky (∼100 pc in diameter), this ionized ring is associated with the O type stars powering M42, NGC 2024 and IC434 (Kreckel et al. 2024). 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 Offset to center [arcmin] 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 Velocity [km/s] Shell fit vsys 0 1 2 3 4 T m b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A position-velocity slice across the GCL center at b = 0 ◦24′ in the 13CO SEDGISM data, as modeled by a simple expanding blister shell (Equation 1). Given the ∼2 kpc distance of this photoionized structure, the size and emission line morphology is strongly reminiscent of what is seen in the nearby Barnard’s Loop. It may indicate a similar origin, of a past supernova event clearing a cavity 35 pc in diamet… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The so-called 'Galactic Center' Lobe (GCL) is an extended (~1 deg) radio continuum feature situated above the Galactic Plane, for which the literature contains varying claims about both its nature and location. Using new optical integral field spectroscopic observations from the SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper, we confirm the characterization of the GCL as a foreground photoionized HII region, not associated with the Galactic center. We present a new analysis of the ionized gas morphology, line ratio diagnostics, and kinematics. From our [SIII]9532 emission line map, which suffers the least extinction, we identify ionized gas emission throughout a closed outer loop, which does not fill the GCL interior. All optical line ratio diagnostics are consistent with photoionization. By comparing the ionized gas reddening from the Balmer decrement with 3D dust maps, we directly constrain the distance to the GCL to ~2 kpc. [NII]6583 line kinematics show a uniform velocity structure across the GCL, further confirming that the entire bubble is one structure. The size and emission line morphology is strongly reminiscent of that seen in the nearby Barnard's Loop, providing a possible analog to explain how this outer shell may be photoionized by a more distant and off-center embedded young cluster. We suggest the acronym GCL be repurposed to instead abbreviate the name 'Greatly Confused Loop'.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses new SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper integral-field spectroscopic observations to recharacterize the 'Galactic Center' Lobe (GCL) as a foreground photoionized HII region at ~2 kpc rather than a Galactic-center structure. Key evidence includes [SIII]9532 emission tracing a closed outer loop without filling the interior, optical line-ratio diagnostics consistent with photoionization, a distance constraint obtained by matching Balmer-decrement reddening to 3D dust maps, and spatially uniform [NII]6583 velocities indicating a single coherent structure. The authors draw an analogy to Barnard's Loop and propose renaming the feature the 'Greatly Confused Loop'.

Significance. If the distance and ionization conclusions hold, the work resolves long-standing ambiguity about an extended radio feature and illustrates how optical IFS plus 3D extinction data can separate foreground HII regions from true Galactic-center phenomena. It supplies a concrete observational template (closed outer shell, off-center photoionization) that may apply to other confused structures. The use of fresh SDSS-V LVM data and the multi-diagnostic approach (morphology, ratios, kinematics, reddening) are clear strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and distance analysis] Abstract and distance analysis: the headline ~2 kpc distance is obtained by equating the observed Balmer-decrement E(B-V) to the cumulative extinction column in a 3D dust map. The text supplies no quantitative information on which map is used, the precise matching algorithm, distance binning, handling of line-of-sight complexity, or error propagation. Because any systematic offset or coarse resolution in the map can shift the inferred distance by hundreds of parsecs, this step is load-bearing for the claim that the GCL is unrelated to the Galactic center and requires explicit robustness tests.
minor comments (3)
  1. Line-ratio diagnostics are stated to be consistent with photoionization, yet no error bars, full tables of measured ratios, or explicit exclusion criteria for alternative mechanisms (shocks, etc.) are provided; adding these would strengthen the assessment.
  2. The [SIII]9532 map is presented as suffering the least extinction, but possible biases from incomplete spatial coverage or residual differential extinction are not quantified; a short discussion or supplementary figure would clarify the morphology claim.
  3. The manuscript would benefit from a brief statement of how the uniform [NII] velocity field was measured (e.g., moment maps, fitting method) and whether any velocity gradients were searched for and ruled out.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive overall assessment of the work. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details and tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and distance analysis: the headline ~2 kpc distance is obtained by equating the observed Balmer-decrement E(B-V) to the cumulative extinction column in a 3D dust map. The text supplies no quantitative information on which map is used, the precise matching algorithm, distance binning, handling of line-of-sight complexity, or error propagation. Because any systematic offset or coarse resolution in the map can shift the inferred distance by hundreds of parsecs, this step is load-bearing for the claim that the GCL is unrelated to the Galactic center and requires explicit robustness tests.

    Authors: We agree that the distance analysis requires more explicit quantitative documentation to support the ~2 kpc result. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant methods and results section to specify the exact 3D dust map employed, describe the matching procedure (cumulative extinction column compared to the observed Balmer-decrement E(B-V)), detail the distance binning and treatment of line-of-sight structure, and provide a full error budget that propagates uncertainties from both the spectroscopic reddening and the dust map. We will also add a dedicated robustness subsection that repeats the analysis under variations in map resolution, small systematic offsets, and alternative maps, demonstrating that the distance remains consistent with ~2 kpc and well in the foreground. These additions will directly address the load-bearing character of the distance constraint. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational analysis

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on new SDSS-V LVM integral-field spectroscopy, standard line-ratio diagnostics for photoionization, kinematic uniformity from [NII]6583, and a direct comparison of observed Balmer-decrement reddening to independent 3D dust maps for the ~2 kpc distance. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions; the dust-map comparison uses external data products whose assumptions are not derived from the present observations. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear in the derivation chain. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard astrophysical assumptions about emission line diagnostics and dust mapping rather than new postulates or fitted parameters.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Optical emission line ratio diagnostics can reliably identify photoionization as the dominant mechanism in HII regions.
    Invoked when stating all optical line ratio diagnostics are consistent with photoionization.
  • domain assumption 3D dust maps provide a sufficiently accurate representation of extinction along the line of sight for distance estimation via Balmer decrement.
    Used to directly constrain the distance to ~2 kpc.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1454 out tokens · 75089 ms · 2026-05-10T07:24:59.819987+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint doi url journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year adsurl label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'be...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Allamandola , L. J., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Barker , J. R. 1989, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/191396 magenta , 71, 733 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJS...71..733A

    work page doi:10.1086/191396 1989

  4. [4]

    D., Armentrout , W

    Anderson , L. D., Armentrout , W. P., Johnstone , B. M., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/26 magenta , 221, 26 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..221...26A

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/26 2015

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 magenta , 212, 1 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..212....1A

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 2014

  6. [6]

    D., Luisi , M., Liu , B., et al

    Anderson , L. D., Luisi , M., Liu , B., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d93 magenta , 969, 43 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969...43A

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d93 2024

  7. [7]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 magenta , 653, A141 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  8. [8]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 magenta , 935, 167 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..167A

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  9. [9]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f magenta , 156, 123 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  10. [10]

    1999, XSPEC: An X-ray spectral fitting package,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:9910.005 http://ascl.net/9910.005 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 magenta , 558, A33 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..33A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  11. [11]

    Avedisova , V. S. & Palous , J. 1989, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 40, 42 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989BAICz..40...42A

    1989

  12. [12]

    1981 , month = feb, journal =

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/130766 magenta , 93, 5 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  13. [13]

    Barnard , E. E. 1894, Popular Astronomy, 2, 151 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1894PA......2..151B

  14. [14]

    T., Chandar , R., Kreckel , K., et al

    Barnes , A. T., Chandar , R., Kreckel , K., et al. 2026, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555751 magenta , 706, A95 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...706A..95B

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555751 2026

  15. [15]

    A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B

    Benjamin , R. A., Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., et al. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/376696 magenta , 115, 953 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..953B

    work page doi:10.1086/376696 2003

  16. [16]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac604c magenta , 134, 054301 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134e4301B

    Bern \'e , O., Habart , \'E ., Peeters , E., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/ac604c magenta , 134, 054301 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134e4301B

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac604c 2022

  17. [17]

    & Cohen , M

    Bland-Hawthorn , J. & Cohen , M. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/344573 magenta , 582, 246 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...582..246B

    work page doi:10.1086/344573 2003

  18. [18]

    L., Nord , M., Kassim , N., Lazio , J., & Anantharamaiah , K

    Brogan , C. L., Nord , M., Kassim , N., Lazio , J., & Anantharamaiah , K. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asna.200385023 magenta Astronomische Nachrichten Supplement , 324, 17 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ANS...324...17B

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200385023 2003

  19. [19]

    and Kinney, Anne L

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/308692 magenta , 533, 682 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...533..682C

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  20. [20]

    and Clayton, Geoffrey C

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/167900 magenta , 345, 245 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  21. [21]

    J., Noriega-Crespo, A., Mizuno, D

    Carey , S. J., Noriega-Crespo , A., Mizuno , D. R., et al. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/596581 magenta , 121, 76 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PASP..121...76C

    work page doi:10.1086/596581 2009

  22. [22]

    , year = 2009, month = mar, volume =

    Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., Meade , M. R., et al. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/597811 magenta , 121, 213 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PASP..121..213C

    work page doi:10.1086/597811 2009

  23. [23]

    S., Patrick , L

    Clark , J. S., Patrick , L. R., Najarro , F., Evans , C. J., & Lohr , M. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039205 magenta , 649, A43 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..43C

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039205 2021

  24. [24]

    2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy

    Comrie , A., Wang , K.-S., Hsu , S.-C., et al. 2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy

    2021

  25. [25]

    & Laureijs , R

    Cox , P. & Laureijs , R. 1989, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 136, The Center of the Galaxy, 121 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989IAUS..136..121C

    1989

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Dopita , M. A., Kewley , L. J., Sutherland , R. S., & Nicholls , D. C. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8 2016

  27. [27]

    A., Kreckel , K., et al

    Drory , N., Blanc , G. A., Kreckel , K., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9 magenta , 168, 198 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..198D

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9 2024

  28. [28]

    1976, , 25, 25 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976A&AS...25...25D

    Dubout-Crillon , R. 1976, , 25, 25 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976A&AS...25...25D

    1976

  29. [29]

    Dutra , C. M. & Bica , E. 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006409 magenta , 359, L9 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...359L...9D

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0006409 2000

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Edenhofer , G., Zucker , C., Frank , P., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 magenta , 685, A82 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..82E

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 2024

  31. [31]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/316293 magenta , 111, 63 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111...63F

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  32. [32]

    M., Goodman, A., Zucker, C., et al

    Foley , M. M., Goodman , A., Zucker , C., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb5f4 magenta , 947, 66 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...947...66F

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb5f4 2023

  33. [33]

    Gaylard , M. J. 1984, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/211.1.149 magenta , 211, 149 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984MNRAS.211..149G

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/211.1.149 1984

  34. [34]

    Journal of Open Source Software , author =

    Green , G. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00695 magenta The Journal of Open Source Software , 3, 695 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JOSS....3..695G

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00695 2018

  35. [35]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad114 magenta , 520, 4902 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4902G

    Groves , B., Kreckel , K., Santoro , F., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad114 magenta , 520, 4902 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.4902G

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad114 2023

  36. [36]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris , C. R., Millman , K. J., van der Walt , S. J., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 magenta , 585, 357 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..357H

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  37. [37]

    M., Reynolds , R

    Heiles , C., Haffner , L. M., Reynolds , R. J., & Tufte , S. L. 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/308935 magenta , 536, 335 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..335H

    work page doi:10.1086/308935 2000

  38. [38]

    D., Barnes , A

    Henshaw , J. D., Barnes , A. T., Battersby , C., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, 83 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ASPC..534...83H

    2023

  39. [39]

    M., Bizenberger , P., Blanc , G

    Herbst , T. M., Bizenberger , P., Blanc , G. A., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad7948 magenta , 168, 267 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..267H

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad7948 2024

  40. [40]

    Heyvaerts , J., Norman , C., & Pudritz , R. E. 1988, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/166506 magenta , 330, 718 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...330..718H

    work page doi:10.1086/166506 1988

  41. [41]

    D., et al

    Heywood , I., Camilo , F., Cotton , W. D., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1532-5 magenta , 573, 235 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.573..235H

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1532-5 2019

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Heywood , I., Rammala , I., Camilo , F., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac449a magenta , 925, 165 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...925..165H

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac449a 2022

  43. [43]

    R., Dalcanton , J

    Hilder , T., Casey , A. R., Dalcanton , J. J., et al. 2026, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae274b magenta , 997, 339 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...997..339H

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274b 2026

  44. [44]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 magenta Computing in Science and Engineering , 9, 90 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9...90H

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  45. [45]

    D., Luisi , M., et al

    Hurley-Walker , N., Anderson , L. D., Luisi , M., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d92 magenta , 969, 42 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969...42H

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d92 2024

  46. [46]

    E., Larosa , T

    Kassim , N. E., Larosa , T. N., & Erickson , W. C. 1986, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/322522a0 magenta , 322, 522 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986Natur.322..522K

    work page doi:10.1038/322522a0 1986

  47. [47]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., Tremonti , C., et al. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x magenta , 346, 1055 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  48. [48]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley , L. J., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., Heisler , C. A., & Trevena , J. 2001, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/321545 magenta , 556, 121 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  49. [49]

    and Nicholls, David C

    Kewley , L. J., Nicholls , D. C., & Sutherland , R. S. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 magenta , 57, 511 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ARA&A..57..511K

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  50. [50]

    V., Piskunov, A

    Kharchenko , N. V., Piskunov , A. E., Schilbach , E., R \"o ser , S., & Scholz , R.-D. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322302 magenta , 558, A53 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..53K

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322302 2013

  51. [51]

    A., Rix , H.-W., Aerts , C., et al

    Kollmeier , J. A., Rix , H.-W., Aerts , C., et al. 2026, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ae0576 magenta , 171, 52 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026AJ....171...52K

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0576 2026

  52. [52]

    P., Herbst , T., Froning , C., et al

    Konidaris , N. P., Herbst , T., Froning , C., et al. 2024, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, 130961Z https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024SPIE13096E..1ZK

    2024

  53. [53]

    V., Egorova , E., et al

    Kreckel , K., Egorov , O. V., Egorova , E., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449943 magenta , 689, A352 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.352K

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449943 2024

  54. [54]

    Law , C. J. 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/474 magenta , 708, 474 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708..474L

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/474 2010

  55. [55]

    J., Backer , D., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Maddalena , R

    Law , C. J., Backer , D., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Maddalena , R. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/695/2/1070 magenta , 695, 1070 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...695.1070L

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/2/1070 2009

  56. [56]

    Luridiana , V., Morisset , C., & Shaw , R. A. 2012, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 283, Planetary Nebulae: An Eye to the Future, 422--423 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012IAUS..283..422L

    2012

  57. [57]

    R., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J

    Mart \' nez-Hern \'a ndez , I. R., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Esteban , C., et al. 2026, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag149 magenta , 546, stag149 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag149M

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag149 2026

  58. [58]

    Martins , F., Schaerer , D., & Hillier , D. J. 2005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042386 magenta , 436, 1049 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...436.1049M

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042386 2005

  59. [59]

    E., Amayo , A., Arellano-C \'o rdova , K

    M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Amayo , A., Arellano-C \'o rdova , K. Z., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3782 magenta , 510, 4436 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.4436M

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3782 2022

  60. [60]

    E., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., et al

    M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Esteban , C., Garc \' a-Rojas , J., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1569 magenta , 523, 2952 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.2952M

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1569 2023

  61. [61]

    & Dias , W

    Monteiro , H. & Dias , W. S. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1455 magenta , 487, 2385 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.2385M

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1455 2019

  62. [62]

    1996, ARA&A, 34, 645, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645

    Morris , M. & Serabyn , E. 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645 magenta , 34, 645 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ARA&A..34..645M

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.645 1996

  63. [63]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz060 magenta , 71, 80 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASJ...71...80N

    Nagoshi , H., Kubose , Y., Fujisawa , K., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psz060 magenta , 71, 80 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASJ...71...80N

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz060 2019

  64. [64]

    & Przybilla , N

    Nieva , M.-F. & Przybilla , N. 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118158 magenta , 539, A143 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...539A.143N

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118158 2012

  65. [65]

    2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/587791 magenta , 680, 1174 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...680.1174N

    Nishiyama , S., Nagata , T., Tamura , M., et al. 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/587791 magenta , 680, 1174 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...680.1174N

    work page doi:10.1086/587791 2008

  66. [66]

    M., Mierkiewicz , E

    Nossal , S. M., Mierkiewicz , E. J., Roesler , F. L., et al. 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013380 magenta Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) , 113, A11307 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008JGRA..11311307N

    work page doi:10.1029/2008ja013380 2008

  67. [67]

    B., Brown, A

    Ochsendorf , B. B., Brown , A. G. A., Bally , J., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/111 magenta , 808, 111 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..111O

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/111 2015

  68. [68]

    H., et al

    Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez , M., Ma \' z Apell \'a niz , J., Barb \'a , R. H., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1409 magenta , 543, 63 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.543...63P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1409 2025

  69. [69]

    Parker , E. N. 1966, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/148828 magenta , 145, 811 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966ApJ...145..811P

    work page doi:10.1086/148828 1966

  70. [70]

    Pilyugin , L. S. & Grebel , E. K. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw238 magenta , 457, 3678 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.3678P

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw238 2016

  71. [71]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1009-6 magenta , 567, 347 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.567..347P

    Ponti , G., Hofmann , F., Churazov , E., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1009-6 magenta , 567, 347 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.567..347P

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1009-6 2019

  72. [72]

    R., Churazov , E., Heywood , I., & Fender , R

    Ponti , G., Morris , M. R., Churazov , E., Heywood , I., & Fender , R. P. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039636 magenta , 646, A66 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A..66P

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039636 2021

  73. [73]

    2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/312426 magenta , 528, L9 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528L...9P

    Popowski , P. 2000, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/312426 magenta , 528, L9 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528L...9P

    work page doi:10.1086/312426 2000

  74. [74]

    1987, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pasj/39.4.573 magenta , 39, 573 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987PASJ...39..573R

    Reich , W., Sofue , Y., & Fuerst , E. 1987, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pasj/39.4.573 magenta , 39, 573 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987PASJ...39..573R

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/39.4.573 1987

  75. [75]

    Reynolds , R. J. & Ogden , P. M. 1979, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/157028 magenta , 229, 942 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...229..942R

    work page doi:10.1086/157028 1979

  76. [76]

    2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440 magenta , 139, 2440 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2440R

    Roeser , S., Demleitner , M., & Schilbach , E. 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440 magenta , 139, 2440 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2440R

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440 2010

  77. [77]

    S \'a nchez , S. F. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 magenta , 58, 99 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58...99S

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 2020

  78. [78]

    F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., Egorov , O

    S \'a nchez , S. F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., Egorov , O. V., et al. 2025 a , http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ad93bb magenta , 169, 52 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...52S

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad93bb 2025

  79. [79]

    F., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n , C., S \'a nchez Almeida , J., Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., & P \'e rez , E

    S \'a nchez , S. F., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n , C., S \'a nchez Almeida , J., Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., & P \'e rez , E. 2025 b , http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556809 magenta , 704, A145 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...704A.145S

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556809 2025

  80. [80]

    F., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J

    Sanchez Sanchez , S. F., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., et al. 2026, http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/ia.30618649e.2026.62.01.7521 magenta , 62, 87 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026RMxAA..62...87S

    work page doi:10.22201/ia.30618649e.2026.62.01.7521 2026

Showing first 80 references.