Searches for massive, long-lived particles in events with displaced vertices with ATLAS
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:39 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
ATLAS searches set new limits on long-lived particles using displaced vertices and updated algorithms.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The central claim is that the Run 2 search with the fuzzy DV algorithm and the Run 3 search with the displaced muon trigger found no significant signal above background and therefore set limits on the production of long-lived particles in Higgs Portal, SUSY, and DFSZ axino models.
What carries the argument
The fuzzy displaced-vertex reconstruction algorithm that reconstructs vertices when decay products do not converge exactly to one point because of intermediate long-lived heavy quarks, together with a new displaced-muon trigger.
Load-bearing premise
The background estimation and efficiency of the new fuzzy vertex and displaced-muon algorithms are correctly modeled in simulation and data-driven methods without unaccounted biases.
What would settle it
A statistically significant excess of displaced-vertex events above the predicted background in the signal regions of either dataset would indicate long-lived particles and falsify the null result.
read the original abstract
Many recent efforts at the LHC have been made to search for new particles that do not decay promptly but are instead long-lived. This has been done via many different exotic signatures, including searches performed at ATLAS for displaced vertices (DV), where the new long-lived particle decays into multiple visible tracks after having traveled a certain distance into the detector. This talk covers two such searches: a Run 2 search for DVs in events triggered by missing transverse energy, and a Run 3 search for DVs in events triggered by muons. The former search is the first to use a new "fuzzy" displaced vertex reconstruction algorithm, alongside the standard one, to effectively reconstruct cases where the long-lived particle decays into heavy quarks that are themselves slightly long-lived, hence causing the final visible decay products to not point back exactly to the same vertex, setting limits on Higgs Portal, SUSY, and DFSZ axino models. The latter search is the first to use a new displaced muon trigger, setting limits on RPV SUSY models.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents two ATLAS searches for massive long-lived particles decaying at displaced vertices. The Run-2 analysis, in MET-triggered events, deploys a new 'fuzzy' displaced-vertex algorithm to reconstruct decays involving heavy quarks that produce non-pointing tracks, and reports limits on Higgs-portal, SUSY, and DFSZ-axino models. The Run-3 analysis uses a new displaced-muon trigger and reports limits on RPV SUSY models.
Significance. If the signal efficiencies and data-driven background estimates for the new algorithms are shown to be unbiased, the results would meaningfully extend sensitivity to long-lived particle scenarios with complex decay topologies that standard vertexing misses. The technical development of the fuzzy algorithm and displaced-muon trigger constitutes a concrete experimental advance that could be adopted in future LLP searches.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract (fuzzy DV algorithm description): the claim that the algorithm correctly assigns efficiency to final states in which b-hadrons introduce small additional displacements is load-bearing for the quoted limits on Higgs-portal and SUSY models. No quantitative efficiency measurements, data-MC closure tests for track multiplicity or vertex resolution, or control-region comparisons are provided, leaving open the possibility of unaccounted biases in the non-pointing-track regime.
- [Abstract] Abstract (background estimation): the data-driven background estimate is invoked to support the limits, yet the abstract supplies neither the method (e.g., sideband extrapolation or ABCD technique) nor validation metrics such as fake-rate tails or residual data-MC discrepancies. Any mismodeling directly scales the reported exclusion contours.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicit statements of the mass and lifetime ranges probed by each search and from a brief mention of the dominant systematic uncertainties.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of the manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing additional context from the full text and making revisions to improve the abstract's clarity while preserving the scientific content.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (fuzzy DV algorithm description): the claim that the algorithm correctly assigns efficiency to final states in which b-hadrons introduce small additional displacements is load-bearing for the quoted limits on Higgs-portal and SUSY models. No quantitative efficiency measurements, data-MC closure tests for track multiplicity or vertex resolution, or control-region comparisons are provided, leaving open the possibility of unaccounted biases in the non-pointing-track regime.
Authors: The abstract is a concise summary, but the full manuscript provides the requested quantitative details: efficiency measurements versus additional b-hadron displacement are shown in Section 4.3 and Figure 6; data-MC closure tests for track multiplicity and vertex resolution appear in Section 5.2 with associated pull distributions; and control-region comparisons are documented in Appendix A. These studies confirm that the fuzzy algorithm assigns efficiencies without significant bias in the non-pointing regime. To make this validation more visible at the abstract level, we have revised the abstract to include a brief statement referencing the data-driven validations performed. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (background estimation): the data-driven background estimate is invoked to support the limits, yet the abstract supplies neither the method (e.g., sideband extrapolation or ABCD technique) nor validation metrics such as fake-rate tails or residual data-MC discrepancies. Any mismodeling directly scales the reported exclusion contours.
Authors: Section 6 of the manuscript describes the background estimation in detail, employing an ABCD technique that exploits correlations between track multiplicity and vertex invariant mass in a dedicated control region. Validation includes measurements of fake-rate tails in sidebands and residual data-MC discrepancies, shown in Section 6.3 and Figure 9, which demonstrate agreement within uncertainties. We agree that the abstract should indicate the method used and have revised it to specify the ABCD approach and note the validation studies, thereby clarifying how the background estimate supports the reported limits. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: experimental search with data-driven limits
full rationale
This is a pure experimental particle physics search paper reporting ATLAS Run 2 and Run 3 results on long-lived particles via displaced vertices. The central claims are upper limits on Higgs Portal, SUSY, DFSZ axino, and RPV SUSY models derived from observed data, estimated backgrounds, and signal efficiencies. No derivation chain, equations, or first-principles predictions exist that could reduce to inputs by construction. Background estimation is described as data-driven, and new algorithms (fuzzy DV, displaced-muon trigger) are validated via standard simulation and control methods without self-referential fitting or renaming of known results. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatzes are invoked to justify the limits themselves. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks (collision data) and receives the default non-circularity finding.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Instrum., 3(08):S08003–S08003, 2008
ATLAS Collaboration.J. Instrum., 3(08):S08003–S08003, 2008
2008
- [2]
- [3]
-
[4]
ATLAS Collaboration.Phys. Rev. D, 97(5):052012, 2018
2018
-
[5]
Gian Francesco Giudice and Andrea Romanino.Nucl. Phys. B, 699(1-2):65–89, 2004
2004
-
[6]
Natsumi Nagata, Hidetoshi Otono, and Satoshi Shirai.JHEP, 2015(10):1–24, 2015
2015
-
[7]
Giorgio Arcadi, Abdelhak Djouadi, and Martti Raidal.Physics Reports, 842:1–180, 2020
2020
-
[8]
Bridging the divide: axion searches and axino phenomenology at colliders
Gabe Hoshino et al. arXiv:2511.07224, 2026
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[9]
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2026-003, 2026
ATLAS Collaboration. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2026-003, 2026
2026
-
[10]
ATLAS Collaboration.Phys. Rev. D, 102(3):032006, 2020
2020
-
[11]
ATLAS Collaboration.Phys. Lett. B, 719:280–298, 2013
2013
-
[12]
CMS Collaboration.Phys. Rev. D, 104(5):052011, 2021
2021
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.