pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17468 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ⚛️ physics.atm-clus

Recognition: unknown

Electron-Impact Quasi-Resonant Ion-Pair Dissociation of OCS: A Velocity Slice Imaging Study with Partial Wave Analysis

Dhananjay Nandi, Narayan Kundu, Soumya Ghosh

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 05:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atm-clus
keywords ion-pair dissociationelectron impactcarbonyl sulfidevelocity map imagingpartial wave analysissuperexcited statesnonadiabatic dissociation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron-impact ion-pair dissociation in OCS proceeds via quasi-resonant hybrid Rydberg-ion-pair states rather than direct dipole excitation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures velocity-mapped images of ion-pair fragments from electron collisions with OCS between 20 and 45 eV. Two channels appear: CO+ + S- and CS+ + O-, each showing kinetic-energy release that stops increasing once the beam energy passes about 30 eV. Angular distributions are decomposed into partial waves; the extracted beta parameter stays above 1 at every energy, ruling out the dipole-Born picture. These observations together indicate that the electron scatters inelastically, populates discrete superexcited configurations that mix Rydberg and ion-pair character, and the molecule then dissociates along nonadiabatic paths. The work therefore replaces a simple excitation model with a state-specific, quasi-resonant mechanism.

Core claim

Electron impact on OCS populates hybrid Rydberg-ion-pair superexcited states that subsequently dissociate unimolecularly along nonadiabatic pathways. This is shown by the leveling of maximum kinetic-energy release above 30 eV in both CO+ + S- and CS+ + O- channels and by the momentum-transfer parameter beta exceeding unity at all studied energies, which forces the dominant partial-wave contributions to shift systematically with incident energy and invalidates the dipole-Born approximation.

What carries the argument

Partial-wave decomposition of the measured fragment angular distributions, which yields the momentum-transfer parameter beta and its energy-dependent dominant wave character.

If this is right

  • The dipole-Born approximation cannot be used to predict angular distributions or cross sections for this process.
  • Dissociation occurs through state-specific unimolecular pathways on nonadiabatic surfaces.
  • Reactive anion and cation pairs are generated without photon emission, redistributing molecular energy in electron-rich environments.
  • The same quasi-resonant pathway supplies a non-radiative channel relevant to astrochemistry and radiation biophysics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed partial-wave shifts may appear in other triatomic molecules under low-energy electron bombardment.
  • Velocity slice imaging plus partial-wave analysis offers a route to map similar superexcited-state landscapes in larger polyatomics.
  • If the hybrid states are long-lived enough, laser preparation of specific initial states could modulate the branching between the two ion-pair channels.

Load-bearing premise

The leveling of maximum kinetic energies above 30 eV together with beta values greater than 1 directly signals population of discrete hybrid Rydberg-ion-pair superexcited states followed by nonadiabatic dissociation.

What would settle it

A measurement showing beta less than or equal to 1 at any energy between 20 and 45 eV, or a maximum kinetic-energy release that continues to rise with beam energy above 30 eV, would disprove the quasi-resonant discrete-state mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17468 by Dhananjay Nandi, Narayan Kundu, Soumya Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of quasi-resonant intramolecular ion-pair formation via superex￾cited Rydberg states following electron–molecule inelastic collisions. (a) An incident electron with energy exceeding the first ionisation potential (IP) collides inelastically with a molecule AB, producing a scattered electron and depositing energy into the target. (b) The collision prepares a superexcited Rydberg state… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time-of-flight mass spectra of anionic products from electron-impact ion-pair dissoci￾ation of OCS at the incident energies indicated. The upper abscissa shows the corresponding mass-to-charge ratio. The dominant peaks correspond to O− (16 u) and S− (32 u). Six ion-pair exit channels are in principle open: OCS + e − → OCS∗∗ + e −′ →    CO+ + S − + e −′ (Channel I) CS+ + O −… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Expanded view of the excitation functions for O − and S − formation in the ion￾pair dissociation (IPD) threshold region. Black arrows indicate the experimentally determined threshold energies for two IPD channels, and a blue arrow is used to reflect the DEA resonance of OCS near 10 eV electron beam energies [56]. Figures 3 plot the excitation functions for O − and S − across 10–45 eV. Near 10 eV, structure… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Conical wedge slice images (50 ns gate) of S − fragments from electron-impact IPD of OCS at (a) 20, (b) 25, (c) 30, (d) 35, (e) 40, and (f) 45 eV. Red arrows indicate the electron beam direction. Figures 4 and 5 show conical wedge slice images for S − and O − at beam energies of 20–45 eV. Radial distance scales with fragment momentum, while polar angle encodes ejection direction from the beam axis [41, 42]… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Conical wedge slice images (50 ns gate) of O − fragments from electron-impact IPD of OCS at (a) 20, (b) 25, (c) 30, (d) 35, (e) 40, and (f) 45 eV. Red arrows indicate the electron beam direction. 3.4 Kinetic energy release distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a,b) Normalised kinetic energy distributions for S − and O − fragments. (c) Mean kinetic energy as a function of incident energy. (d–f) Two-Gaussian decomposition of O − distributions demonstrating bimodal character. • Slow component: CS+ (X 2Σ +) + O − • Fast component: CS+ (A 2Π) + O − The A–X interval of CS+ (∼2.0 eV) [66, 67] is consistent with this assignment. In the heavy-Rydberg picture, the hybrid… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinetic-energy-integrated angular distributions for S − fragments. Solid curves are fits to equation (10) assuming (a) pure Σ → Σ (µ = 0) transitions and (b) mixed Σ → Σ + Π transitions. Figures 7 and 8 display KE-integrated angular distributions with fits to equation (10) using partial waves up to lmax = 3. Polar plots appear in figure 9. Tables 1 and 2 collect optimised fitting parameters. At every beam … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Kinetic-energy-integrated angular distributions for O − fragments. Panels (a,c) show fits for pure Σ → Σ transitions; panels (b,d) include Π contributions. 3.7 Angular anisotropy We define the anisotropy parameter α = (Imax − Imin)/(Imax + Imin) [61] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Polar representations of angular distributions for (a) S − and (b,c) O − fragments at selected incident energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Angular anisotropy parameter α as a function of incident electron energy for O − (first and second KE bands) and S− fragments. ionic core. As the molecule slides along the dissociation coordinate, the ion-pair weight of the wavefunction grows at each successive avoided crossing until intramolecular charge separation is complete [3, 8]. The two KE humps of O − indicate that Channel II taps doorway states c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present velocity map imaging data on intramolecular ion-pair dissociation (IPD) of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) induced by electron impact over the 20 eV to 45 eV energy range. Two distinct IPD pathways were resolved: CO+ + S- (threshold 14.8 +- 0.7 eV) and CS+ + O- (threshold 16.8 +- 0.7 eV). The kinetic energy release spectra display a single peak for S- but split into two components for O-; in both channels the maximum kinetic energies level off once the beam energy exceeds roughly 30 eV, pointing to excitation through discrete superexcited states of quasi-resonant character. Partial wave decomposition of the fragment angular distributions reveals that the momentum-transfer parameter (beta) surpasses unity at every energy studied, invalidating the dipole-Born approximation, and that the dominant partial wave character shifts systematically with beam energy. These patterns are consistent with a mechanism in which the incident electron deposits energy through inelastic scattering, populating hybrid Rydberg-ion-pair superexcited configurations that subsequently undergo state-specific unimolecular dissociation along nonadiabatic pathways. From an applied standpoint, intramolecular ion-pair dissociation matters for astrochemistry and radiation biophysics because it generates reactive anions and cations without photon emission, redistributing excess molecular energy nonadiabatically in environments ranging from interstellar clouds to biological systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents velocity slice imaging measurements of electron-impact intramolecular ion-pair dissociation (IPD) of OCS over 20–45 eV. Two channels are resolved: CO⁺ + S⁻ (threshold 14.8 ± 0.7 eV) and CS⁺ + O⁻ (threshold 16.8 ± 0.7 eV). Kinetic-energy release spectra exhibit a single peak for S⁻ and two components for O⁻; in both channels the maximum kinetic energies level off above ~30 eV. Partial-wave analysis of fragment angular distributions yields a momentum-transfer parameter β > 1 at all studied energies and a systematic shift in dominant partial-wave character with beam energy. These observations are interpreted as evidence for quasi-resonant population of hybrid Rydberg–ion-pair superexcited states followed by state-specific nonadiabatic dissociation.

Significance. If the mechanistic assignment holds, the work supplies direct experimental constraints on electron-driven nonadiabatic dissociation pathways in a triatomic molecule, with relevance to astrochemistry and radiation biophysics. The velocity-map imaging data, resolved channel thresholds, and partial-wave decomposition constitute a solid experimental contribution that challenges the dipole-Born regime and documents energy-dependent angular distributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of kinetic-energy spectra and mechanism] The central mechanistic claim—that the KE plateau above ~30 eV and β > 1 arise specifically from discrete hybrid Rydberg–ion-pair superexcited states—rests on qualitative consistency rather than quantitative state matching. No comparison is presented to computed vertical excitation energies, potential curves, or tabulated spectroscopic features of OCS in the 15–45 eV window (see discussion of superexcited-state assignment). Alternative valence or core-excited resonances could produce similar KE cutoffs and angular distributions.
  2. [Partial-wave decomposition of angular distributions] The statement that β surpasses unity at every energy, thereby invalidating the dipole-Born approximation, lacks the explicit functional form of the partial-wave decomposition and propagated uncertainties on β. It is therefore unclear whether the values definitively exceed the dipole-Born regime or merely indicate non-negligible higher multipoles (see partial-wave analysis section).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 4 and associated text] Figure captions should explicitly state the number of shots or events contributing to each angular distribution to allow assessment of statistical precision.
  2. [Experimental thresholds paragraph] The thresholds are given with ±0.7 eV uncertainty; the manuscript should clarify whether this includes only beam-energy calibration or also the fitting procedure for the onset.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion of kinetic-energy spectra and mechanism] The central mechanistic claim—that the KE plateau above ~30 eV and β > 1 arise specifically from discrete hybrid Rydberg–ion-pair superexcited states—rests on qualitative consistency rather than quantitative state matching. No comparison is presented to computed vertical excitation energies, potential curves, or tabulated spectroscopic features of OCS in the 15–45 eV window (see discussion of superexcited-state assignment). Alternative valence or core-excited resonances could produce similar KE cutoffs and angular distributions.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on strengthening the mechanistic interpretation. The observed plateau in maximum kinetic energy release above ~30 eV is a key experimental signature pointing to excitation of discrete superexcited states, as opposed to direct access to the ionization continuum. While the present study is experimental and does not include new ab initio computations of vertical excitation energies or potential curves, we have cited existing electron energy-loss and photoabsorption data on OCS superexcited states in the 15–45 eV range. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion section to include these references explicitly, clarified that the assignment to hybrid Rydberg–ion-pair states is based on consistency with the KE and angular data, and stated that alternative valence or core-excited resonances cannot be ruled out without further theoretical input. This makes the interpretation appropriately cautious while preserving the experimental constraints provided by the data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Partial-wave decomposition of angular distributions] The statement that β surpasses unity at every energy, thereby invalidating the dipole-Born approximation, lacks the explicit functional form of the partial-wave decomposition and propagated uncertainties on β. It is therefore unclear whether the values definitively exceed the dipole-Born regime or merely indicate non-negligible higher multipoles (see partial-wave analysis section).

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the need for greater transparency in the partial-wave analysis. The angular distributions were fitted using a partial-wave expansion expressed in Legendre polynomials, with the anisotropy parameter β extracted from the fit coefficients. We have now added the explicit functional form of the decomposition (including the relation to momentum transfer) and the propagated uncertainties on β to the revised partial-wave analysis section. The updated values confirm that β exceeds 1 outside the fitting uncertainties at all energies studied, indicating significant higher-multipole contributions beyond the pure dipole-Born limit. We have also revised the text to clarify that this demonstrates deviations from the dipole-Born regime rather than a wholesale invalidation of the Born approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observations and standard analysis stand independently

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of kinetic energy release spectra and angular distributions from velocity slice imaging, followed by standard partial-wave decomposition to extract the momentum-transfer parameter beta. These quantities are obtained from data fitting and do not reduce by the paper's own equations to prior fitted inputs or self-citations. The mechanistic interpretation is explicitly framed as qualitative consistency with the observed trends (KE leveling above ~30 eV and beta > 1) rather than a deductive derivation. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; the central claims rest on measured spectra and external physical principles (e.g., dipole-Born limits) without self-referential closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on measured experimental thresholds and angular distributions interpreted through standard concepts of superexcited states; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated beyond conventional Rydberg and ion-pair terminology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5568 in / 1131 out tokens · 55440 ms · 2026-05-10T05:51:07.747970+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ion pair dissociation: spectroscopy and dynamics.Annu

    Arthur G Suits and John W Hepburn. Ion pair dissociation: spectroscopy and dynamics.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 57:431–465, 2006. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141209

    work page arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Eyler, Phillip L

    Adam Kirrander, Seth Rittenhouse, Marco Ascoli, Edward E. Eyler, Phillip L. Gould, and H. R. Sadeghpour. Approach to form long-range ion-pair molecules in an ultracold rb gas.Phys. Rev. A, 87:031402, 03 2013. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.87.031402

    2013

  3. [3]

    Heavy rydberg states: large amplitude vibrations.Faraday discussions, 212:175–190, 2018

    Adam Kirrander, Christian Jungen, Robert J Donovan, and Kenneth P Lawley. Heavy rydberg states: large amplitude vibrations.Faraday discussions, 212:175–190, 2018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1039/C8FD00096D

    work page doi:10.1039/c8fd00096d 2018

  4. [4]

    Molecular ion-pair states in ungerade h2.Phys

    Adam Kirrander and Christian Jungen. Molecular ion-pair states in ungerade h2.Phys. Rev. A, 84:052512, 2011. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.84. 052512

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.84 2011

  5. [5]

    Resonant scattering of electrons by molecules

    James Norman Bardsley and F Mandl. Resonant scattering of electrons by molecules. Reports on progress in physics, 31(2):471–531, 1968. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1088/0034-4885/31/2/302

    1968

  6. [6]

    Angular dependence of scattering products in electron-molecule resonant excitation and in dissociative attachment.Phys

    Thomas F O’Malley and Howard S Taylor. Angular dependence of scattering products in electron-molecule resonant excitation and in dissociative attachment.Phys. Rev., 176(1):207, 1968. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.176.207

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.176.207 1968

  7. [8]

    Greene, A

    Chris H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour. Creation of polar and nonpolar ultra-long-range rydberg molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:2458–2461, 09 2000. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2458. 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2458 2000

  8. [9]

    Giannakeas, Matthew T

    P. Giannakeas, Matthew T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux, and Jan M. Rost. Dressed ion-pair states of an ultralong-range rydberg molecule.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:123401, 2020. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.123401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.123401 2020

  9. [10]

    Molecular Physics , author =

    Christian Fey, Frederic Hummel, and Peter Schmelcher. Ultralong-range rydberg molecules.Mol. Phys., 118(2):e1679401, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00268976.2019.1679401

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [11]

    Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali.Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942), 11(3):157–166, 1934

    Enrico Fermi. Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali.Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942), 11(3):157–166, 1934. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1007/BF02959829

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02959829 1924

  11. [12]

    Heavy rydberg states.Mol

    Elmar Reinhold and Wim Ubachs. Heavy rydberg states.Mol. Phys., 103(10): 1329–1352, 2005. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00268970500050621

    work page doi:10.1080/00268970500050621 2005

  12. [13]

    Interaction of vuv photons with molecules: Spectroscopy and dynamics of molecular superexcited states.J

    Yoshihiko Hatano. Interaction of vuv photons with molecules: Spectroscopy and dynamics of molecular superexcited states.J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relt. Phenom., 119 (2-3):107–125, 2001. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0368-2048(01)00285-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(01)00285-7 2001

  13. [14]

    Superexcited states of molecules.Rad

    Robert L Platzman. Superexcited states of molecules.Rad. Re., 17(3):419–425, 1962. URLhttps://doi.org/10.2307/3571104

    work page doi:10.2307/3571104 1962

  14. [15]

    Superexcited state dynamics of ocs: An experimental identification of three competing decay channels among autoionization, internal conversion, and neutral predissociation.J

    Qiaoli Hao, Jinyou Long, Xulan Deng, Ying Tang, Bumaliya Abulimiti, and Bing Zhang. Superexcited state dynamics of ocs: An experimental identification of three competing decay channels among autoionization, internal conversion, and neutral predissociation.J. Phys. Chem. A, 121(20):3858–3863, 2017. URL https://doi. org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b01895

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.7b01895 2017

  15. [16]

    Fundamentals of mass spectrometry, chapter-5, superexcited states of molecules.Fundamentals of mass spectrometry, chapter-5, Springer, pages 81–87, 2013

    N Kouchi. Fundamentals of mass spectrometry, chapter-5, superexcited states of molecules.Fundamentals of mass spectrometry, chapter-5, Springer, pages 81–87, 2013. URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-7233-9_5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7233-9_5 2013

  16. [17]

    Molecularapplicationsofquantumdefecttheory

    ChJungen. Molecularapplicationsofquantumdefecttheory. InMolecular Applications of Quantum Defect Theory, pages 7–14. Routledge, CRC, 2019. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1201/9780203746608

    work page doi:10.1201/9780203746608 2019

  17. [18]

    Molecules in high rydberg states.Annual review of physical chemistry, 48(1):675–709, 1997

    Frédéric Merkt. Molecules in high rydberg states.Annual review of physical chemistry, 48(1):675–709, 1997. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1. 675

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1 1997

  18. [19]

    High rydberg states of argon: Stark effect and field-ionization properties.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical 18 Physics, 31(8):1705–1724, 1998

    Frédéric Merkt, Andreas Osterwalder, Robert Seiler, Ruth Signorell, Hartmut Palm, Hansjürg Schmutz, and René Gunzinger. High rydberg states of argon: Stark effect and field-ionization properties.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical 18 Physics, 31(8):1705–1724, 1998. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/31/8/ 020

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/31/8/ 1998

  19. [20]

    Electric field induced dissociation of molecules in rydberg-like highly vibrationally excited ion-pair states.Physical review letters, 79 (17):3154, 1997

    James DD Martin and JW Hepburn. Electric field induced dissociation of molecules in rydberg-like highly vibrationally excited ion-pair states.Physical review letters, 79 (17):3154, 1997. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3154

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3154 1997

  20. [21]

    Charge-transfer-induced predissociation in rydberg states of molecular cations: Mgar+.J

    Dominik Wehrli, Matthieu Génévriez, Stefan Knecht, Markus Reiher, and Frédéric Merkt. Charge-transfer-induced predissociation in rydberg states of molecular cations: Mgar+.J. Phys. Chem. A, 125(31):6681–6696, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1021/acs.jpca.1c03859

    2021

  21. [22]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and 29 Engineering Sciences478(2260), 20210904 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa

    Clarence Zener. Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 137(833):696–702, 1932. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa. 1932.0165

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa 1932

  22. [23]

    Beyond born-oppenheimer: Molecular dynamics through a conical intersection.Annu

    Graham A Worth and Lorenz S Cederbaum. Beyond born-oppenheimer: Molecular dynamics through a conical intersection.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 55:127–158, 2004. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094335

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094335 2004

  23. [24]

    Nonadiabatic quantum chemistry past, present, and future.Chem- ical reviews, 112(1):481–498, 2012

    David R Yarkony. Nonadiabatic quantum chemistry past, present, and future.Chem- ical reviews, 112(1):481–498, 2012. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr2001299

    work page doi:10.1021/cr2001299 2012

  24. [25]

    Academic press, 2012

    Joseph Berkowitz.Photoabsorption, photoionization, and photoelectron spectroscopy. Academic press, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-091650-4. X5001-4

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-091650-4 2012

  25. [26]

    Larsen, Robert R

    Kirk A. Larsen, Robert R. Lucchese, Daniel S. Slaughter, and Thorsten Weber. Dis- tinguishing resonance symmetries with energy-resolved photoion angular distributions from ion-pair formation in o2 following two-photon absorption of a 9.3 ev femtosecond pulse.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 153(2):021103, 07 2020. ISSN 0021-9606. URLhttps://doi.org/10.106...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0013485 2020

  26. [27]

    M. A. Khakoo, C. P. Malone, P. V. Johnson, B. R. Lewis, R. Laher, S. Wang, V. Swaminathan, D. Nuyujukian, and I. Kanik. Electron-impact excitation of x 1Σ + g (v ′′ = 0)to the a ′′1Σ + g , b 1Πu, c3 1Πu, o3 1Πu, b ′1Σ + u, c ′ 4 1Σ + u, g 3Πu, and f 3Πu states of molecular nitrogen.Phys. Rev. A, 77:012704, 2008. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysR...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012704 2008

  27. [28]

    Threshold electron impact excitation of atoms and molecules: Detection of triplet and temporary negative ion states.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 48(2):901–909, 1968

    RN Compton, RH Huebner, PW Reinhardt, and LG Christophorou. Threshold electron impact excitation of atoms and molecules: Detection of triplet and temporary negative ion states.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 48(2):901–909, 1968. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1668733. 19

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1668733 1968

  28. [29]

    Excitationofopticallyforbidden states in the ionization continuum by electron impact.Physical Review, 139(4A): A1039, 1965

    JArolSimpson, GEChamberlain, andSRMielczarek. Excitationofopticallyforbidden states in the ionization continuum by electron impact.Physical Review, 139(4A): A1039, 1965. URL https://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/ PhysRev.139.A1039/fulltext

    1965

  29. [30]

    Nonadi- abatic bending dissociation in 16 valence electron system ocs.J

    Toshinori Suzuki, Hideki Katayanagi, Shinkoh Nanbu, and Mutsumi Aoyagi. Nonadi- abatic bending dissociation in 16 valence electron system ocs.J. Chem. Phys., 109 (14):5778–5794, 1998. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.477200

    work page doi:10.1063/1.477200 1998

  30. [31]

    Spin–orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 2(2):187–203, 2012

    Christel M Marian. Spin–orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 2(2):187–203, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.83

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.83 2012

  31. [32]

    Ultrafast spin coherence reveals ion-pairing–mediated molecular dynamics in solution.Chem

    Jacob O Rothbaum, Juliette C Whiteside, Erica Sutcliffe, Jonathan P Aalto, Nathanael P Kazmierczak, and Ryan G Hadt. Ultrafast spin coherence reveals ion-pairing–mediated molecular dynamics in solution.Chem. Archive, 2026. URL https://chemrxiv.org/doi/pdf/10.26434/chemrxiv.15000874/v1

    work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.15000874/v1 2026

  32. [33]

    Electronic spectoscopy of isoelectronic molecules

    Sean P McGlynn, John W Rabalais, Jimmie R McDonald, and VM Scherr. Electronic spectoscopy of isoelectronic molecules. ii. linear triatomic groupings containing sixteen valence electrons.Chem. Rev., 71(1):73–108, 1971. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ cr60269a004

    1971

  33. [34]

    Negative-ion mass spectrometric study of ion-pair formation in the vacuum ultraviolet

    Koichiro Mitsuke, Shinzo Suzuki, Takashi Imamura, and Inosuke Koyano. Negative-ion mass spectrometric study of ion-pair formation in the vacuum ultraviolet. ii. ocs→s-+ co+, o-+ cs+, and co2→o-+ co+.The Journal of chemical physics, 93(3):1710–1719,

  34. [35]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.459098

    work page doi:10.1063/1.459098

  35. [36]

    Dissociative electron attachment to ocs.J

    I Iga and SK Srivastava. Dissociative electron attachment to ocs.J. Mole. Struc.: THEOCHEM, 335(1-3):31–36, 1995. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0166-1280(94)03979-U

    1995

  36. [38]

    Dissociative attachment in so2 and ocs: evidence for vibrational excitation of the so, o2 and co fragments.J

    R Abouaf and F Fiquet-Fayard. Dissociative attachment in so2 and ocs: evidence for vibrational excitation of the so, o2 and co fragments.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 9(11):L323, 1976. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/9/11/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/9/11/006 1976

  37. [39]

    Electron- impact fragmentation dynamics of carbonyl sulfide: A combined experimental and theoretical study.Phys

    Soumya Ghosh, Narayan Kundu, Aryya Ghosh, and Dhananjay Nandi. Electron- impact fragmentation dynamics of carbonyl sulfide: A combined experimental and theoretical study.Phys. Rev. A, 112:062817, 2025. URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/cmws-ps5b. 20

    work page doi:10.1103/cmws-ps5b 2025

  38. [40]

    Yuichiro Ueno, Matthew S Johnson, Sebastian O Danielache, Carsten Eskebjerg, Antra Pandey, and Naohiro Yoshida. Geological sulfur isotopes indicate elevated ocs in the archean atmosphere, solving faint young sun paradox.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35):14784–14789, 2009. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0903518106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0903518106 2009

  39. [41]

    Constraining the atmospheric ocs budget from sulfur isotopes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(34):20447–20452, 2020

    Shohei Hattori, Kazuki Kamezaki, and Naohiro Yoshida. Constraining the atmospheric ocs budget from sulfur isotopes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(34):20447–20452, 2020. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007260117

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2007260117 2020

  40. [42]

    Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen.Rev

    André TJB Eppink and David H Parker. Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: Application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 68(9):3477–3484, 1997. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1063/1.1148310

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1148310 1997

  41. [43]

    Cambridge university press.Imaging in molecular dynam- ics: technology and applications, page 22, 2003

    Benjamin J Whitaker. Cambridge university press.Imaging in molecular dynam- ics: technology and applications, page 22, 2003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511535437

    2003

  42. [44]

    Breakdown of the dipole-born approximation for predicting angular distributions of dissociation fragments.J

    Richard J Van Brunt. Breakdown of the dipole-born approximation for predicting angular distributions of dissociation fragments.J. Chem. Phys., 60(8):3064–3070,

  43. [45]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1681491

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1681491

  44. [46]

    Angular distribution of protons and deuterons produced by dissociative ionization of h 2 and d 2 near threshold.Phys

    RJ Van Brunt and LJ Kieffer. Angular distribution of protons and deuterons produced by dissociative ionization of h 2 and d 2 near threshold.Phys. Rev. A, 2(4):1293,

  45. [47]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.2.1293

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.2.1293

  46. [48]

    Complete data acquisition and analysis system for low-energy electron–molecule collision studies.Mea

    Pamir Nag and Dhananjay Nandi. Complete data acquisition and analysis system for low-energy electron–molecule collision studies.Mea. Sci. Tech., 26(9):095007, 2015. URLhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-0233/26/9/095007

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-0233/26/9/095007 2015

  47. [49]

    Velocity slice imaging for dissociative electron attachment.Rev

    Dhananjay Nandi, Vaibhav S Prabhudesai, E Krishnakumar, and A Chatterjee. Velocity slice imaging for dissociative electron attachment.Rev. Sci. Instrum, 76(5): 053107, 2005. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1899404

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1899404 2005

  48. [50]

    Multi- ple hit readout of a microchannel plate detector with a threelayer delayline anode

    Ottmar Jagutzki, Alfred Cerezo, Achim Czasch, R Dorner, M Hattas, Min Huang, Volker Mergel, Uwe Spillmann, Klaus Ullmann-Pfleger, Thorsten Weber, et al. Multi- ple hit readout of a microchannel plate detector with a threelayer delayline anode. IEEE Trans. Nuc. Sci., 49(5):2477–2483, 2002. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ TNS.2002.803889

    work page arXiv 2002

  49. [51]

    Slice imaging: A new approach to ion imaging 21 and velocity mapping.Rev

    Christoph R Gebhardt, T Peter Rakitzis, Peter C Samartzis, Vlassis Ladopoulos, and Theofanis N Kitsopoulos. Slice imaging: A new approach to ion imaging 21 and velocity mapping.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 72(10):3848–3853, 2001. URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1403010

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1403010 2001

  50. [52]

    Moradmand, D

    A. Moradmand, D. S. Slaughter, A. L. Landers, and M. Fogle. Dissociative-electron- attachment dynamics near the 8-ev feshbach resonance of co2.Phys. Rev. A, 88: 022711, 2013. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022711

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.022711 2013

  51. [53]

    Effect of slicing in velocity map imaging for the study of dissociation dynamics

    Narayan Kundu, Dipayan Biswas, Vikrant Kumar, Anirban Paul, and Dhananjay Nandi. Effect of slicing in velocity map imaging for the study of dissociation dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07168, 2021. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07168

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [54]

    Breakdown of dipole born approximation and the role of rydberg’s predissociation for the electron-induced ion-pair dissociation to oxygen in the presence of background gases.J

    Narayan Kundu, Vikrant Kumar, and Dhananjay Nandi. Breakdown of dipole born approximation and the role of rydberg’s predissociation for the electron-induced ion-pair dissociation to oxygen in the presence of background gases.J. Chem. Phys., 158(15), 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141973

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0141973 2023

  53. [55]

    Tomographic reconstruction techniques optimized for velocity-map imaging applications.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(11): 114201, 09 2022

    Chris Sparling and Dave Townsend. Tomographic reconstruction techniques optimized for velocity-map imaging applications.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(11): 114201, 09 2022. ISSN 0021-9606. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0101789

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0101789 2022

  54. [56]

    3d velocity map imaging of electrons with tpx3cam.Review of Scientific Instruments, 93(1):013003, 01 2022

    Chuan Cheng, Gönenç Moğol, Thomas Weinacht, Andrei Nomerotski, and Carlos Trallero-Herrero. 3d velocity map imaging of electrons with tpx3cam.Review of Scientific Instruments, 93(1):013003, 01 2022. ISSN 0034-6748. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1063/5.0071804

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0071804 2022

  55. [57]

    Application of time-sliced ion velocity imaging to crossed molecular beam experiments.Rev

    Jim J Lin, Jingang Zhou, Weicheng Shiu, and Kopin Liu. Application of time-sliced ion velocity imaging to crossed molecular beam experiments.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 74 (4):2495–2500, 2003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1561604

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1561604 2003

  56. [58]

    Time-of-flight mass spectrometer with improved resolution.Rev

    WC Wiley and Ii H McLaren. Time-of-flight mass spectrometer with improved resolution.Rev. Sci. Instrum., 26(12):1150–1157, 1955. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1063/1.1715212

    1955

  57. [59]

    Observation of renner–teller and predissocia- tion coupled vibronic intensity borrowing in dissociative electron attachment to ocs

    Narayan Kundu and Dhananjay Nandi. Observation of renner–teller and predissocia- tion coupled vibronic intensity borrowing in dissociative electron attachment to ocs. J. Chem. Phys., 160(11):114315, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0188833

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0188833 2024

  58. [60]

    Nsrds-nbs 31

    B.deB.Darwent. Nsrds-nbs 31. washington, dc: U.s. national bureau of standards. lccn 70602101.Bond Dissociation Energies in Simple Molecules, page 24, 1970. URL https://srd.nist.gov/NSRDS/NSRDS-NBS31.pdf

    1970

  59. [61]

    Direct determination of the ionization potential of co by 22 resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization mass spectroscopy.Chem

    P Erman, A Karawajczyk, E Rachlew-Källne, C Strömholm, Jörgen Larsson, Anders Persson, and R Zerne. Direct determination of the ionization potential of co by 22 resonantly enhanced multiphoton ionization mass spectroscopy.Chem. phys. lett., 215(1-3):173–178, 1993. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)89283-N

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(93)89283-n 1993

  60. [62]

    Electron affinities of 16 o, 17 o, 18 o, the fine structure of 16 o-, and the hyperfine structure of 17 o-.Phys

    Christophe Blondel, Christian Delsart, C Valli, S Yiou, MR Godefroid, and Sophie Van Eck. Electron affinities of 16 o, 17 o, 18 o, the fine structure of 16 o-, and the hyperfine structure of 17 o-.Phys. Rev. A, 64(5):052504, 2001. URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052504

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052504 2001

  61. [63]

    Wells and J

    James E. Wells and J. N. Yukich. Photodetachment spectroscopy from the lowest threshold ofs−.Phys. Rev. A, 80:055403, 2009. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.055403

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.80.055403 2009

  62. [64]

    Exact Solutions of the Sine-Gordon Equation Describing Oscillations in a Long (but Finite) Josephson Junction

    Richard N Zare. Dissociation of h2+ by electron impact: Calculated angular distri- bution.J. Chem. Phys., 47(1):204–215, 1967. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1. 1711847

    work page doi:10.1063/1 1967

  63. [65]

    Effect of rotation and thermal velocity on the anisotropy in photodissociation spectroscopy.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 55(4):1915–1922, 1971

    C Jonah. Effect of rotation and thermal velocity on the anisotropy in photodissociation spectroscopy.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 55(4):1915–1922, 1971. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1063/1.1676328

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1676328 1915

  64. [66]

    Number 1

    Reinhard Schinke.Photodissociation dynamics: spectroscopy and fragmentation of small polyatomic molecules. Number 1. Cambridge university press, 1995. URL https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586453

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511586453 1995

  65. [67]

    trilobite-resembling

    Narayan Kundu, Vikrant Kumar, and Dhananjay Nandi. Low-energy electron-induced ion-pair dissociation to "trilobite-resembling" long-range heavy rydberg system, 2022. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14050

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [68]

    Cambridge university press, 2009

    Raphael D Levine.Molecular reaction dynamics. Cambridge university press, 2009. URLhttps://books.google.de/books?id=FVqyS31OM7sC&printsec= frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

    2009

  67. [69]

    Constants of diatomic molecules

    KPAH Huber.Molecular spectra and molecular structure: IV. Constants of diatomic molecules. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4757-0961-2

    2013

  68. [70]

    Coxon, Pierre J

    John A. Coxon, Pierre J. Marcoux, and D. W. Setser. TheA2Π–X 2Σ + band system of CS+: A high-resolution study.Chemical Physics, 164(3):377–389, 1992. URL 10.1016/0301-0104(92)87076-L

    work page doi:10.1016/0301-0104(92)87076-l 1992

  69. [71]

    Electron–molecule scattering cross- sections

    Michael J Brunger and Stephen J Buckman. Electron–molecule scattering cross- sections. i. experimental techniques and data for diatomic molecules.Physics reports, 357(3-5):215–458, 2002. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00032-1. 23

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00032-1 2002

  70. [72]

    Ion-pair dissociation dynamics in electron collision with carbon dioxide probed by velocity slice imaging, 2020

    Narayan Kundu, Sumit Naskar, Irina Jana, Anirban Paul, and Dhananjay Nandi. Ion-pair dissociation dynamics in electron collision with carbon dioxide probed by velocity slice imaging, 2020. URLhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.13182

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [73]

    E. R. I. Abraham, W. I. McAlexander, C. A. Sackett, and Randall G. Hulet. Spec- troscopic determination of thes-wave scattering length of lithium.Phys. Rev. Lett., 74:1315–1318, 1995. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74. 1315

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74 1995

  72. [74]

    Controlling rydberg atom excitations in dense background gases.J

    Tara Cubel Liebisch, Michael Schlagmüller, Felix Engel, Huan Nguyen, Jonathan Balewski, Graham Lochead, Fabian Böttcher, Karl M Westphal, Kathrin S Kleinbach, Thomas Schmid, et al. Controlling rydberg atom excitations in dense background gases.J. Phys. B: Atom. Mole. Opt. Phys., 49(18):182001, 2016. URL https: //doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/49/18/182001

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/18/182001 2016

  73. [75]

    Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range rydberg molecules.J

    Matthew T Eiles. Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range rydberg molecules.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 52(11):113001, 2019. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/ab19ca

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab19ca 2019

  74. [76]

    Projected complex absorbing potential multireference configuration interaction approach for shape and feshbach resonances

    Mushir Thodika and Spiridoula Matsika. Projected complex absorbing potential multireference configuration interaction approach for shape and feshbach resonances. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 18(6):3377–3390, 2022. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jctc.1c01310

    2022

  75. [77]

    Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular rydberg states.J

    Edward L Hamilton, Chris H Greene, and H R Sadeghpour. Shape-resonance-induced long-range molecular rydberg states.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 35(10):L199– L206, 2002. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/35/10/102

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/35/10/102 2002

  76. [78]

    Fixed-moleculephotoelectronangulardistributions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 65(3):1130–1133, 1976

    DanDill. Fixed-moleculephotoelectronangulardistributions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 65(3):1130–1133, 1976. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.433187

    work page doi:10.1063/1.433187 1976

  77. [79]

    Effective Field Theory.Annu

    Katharine L Reid. Photoelectron angular distributions.Annual review of phys- ical chemistry, 54(1):397–424, 2003. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. physchem.54.011002.103814

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev 2003

  78. [80]

    Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice: evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms , isbn =

    Tomas Baer and William L Hase.Unimolecular reaction dynamics: theory and experiments, volume 31. Oxford university press, 1996. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1093/oso/9780195074949.001.0001

    work page arXiv 1996

  79. [81]

    Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999

    Jeffrey I Steinfeld, Joseph Salvadore Francisco, and William L Hase.Chemical kinetics and dynamics, volume 2. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999. URL https://archive.org/details/chemicalkinetics0000stei/page/n9/mode/2up. 24

    1999

  80. [82]

    The kinetics of the recombination of methyl radicals and iodine atoms.The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 55(6):894–908, 1951

    Rudolph A Marcus and OK Rice. The kinetics of the recombination of methyl radicals and iodine atoms.The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 55(6):894–908, 1951. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/j150489a013

    work page doi:10.1021/j150489a013 1951

Showing first 80 references.