pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17568 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 💻 cs.LG · math.ST· stat.ML· stat.TH

Recognition: unknown

Diverse Dictionary Learning

Andrew Gordon Wilson, Kun Zhang, Shunxing Fan, Yujia Zheng, Zijian Li

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG math.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords diverse dictionary learninglatent variable identifiabilityset operationsinductive biasunsupervised learningdependency structurestructural diversity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Intersections, complements, and symmetric differences of latent variables linked to observations remain identifiable from data alone, even without strong assumptions on the model or data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses the challenge of recovering unknown latent variables from observational data when full identifiability is not possible due to limited assumptions. It introduces diverse dictionary learning as a framework to identify set-theoretic operations on these latents, such as their intersections, complements, and symmetric differences, along with the dependency structure between latents and observations. These identifiable elements can be combined using set algebra to form useful structured representations of the hidden variables, like genus-differentia definitions. When the data exhibits enough structural diversity, this leads to complete recovery of all latent variables. The approach relies on incorporating a straightforward inductive bias into estimation procedures that works with most existing models.

Core claim

In the setting where data X is generated by an unknown function g from unknown latents Z, the intersections, complements, and symmetric differences of the latent variables associated with arbitrary observations, together with the latent-to-observed dependency structure, are identifiable up to appropriate indeterminacies without requiring strong assumptions like linearity. These set-theoretic objects can be composed via set algebra to yield structured views such as genus-differentia definitions of the hidden factors. Sufficient structural diversity in the setup further guarantees full identifiability of the latent variables. All these identifiability results stem from a simple inductive bias.

What carries the argument

Diverse dictionary learning, which formalizes the recovery of set operations (intersections, complements, symmetric differences) on latent variables linked to observations along with the latent-to-observed dependency structure.

If this is right

  • Structured views of the hidden world such as genus-differentia definitions can be constructed by composing the identifiable set operations.
  • Full identifiability of all latent variables follows automatically once sufficient structural diversity is present.
  • The inductive bias can be added to most existing latent variable models to obtain the partial and full recoveries.
  • The dependency structure between latents and observations becomes recoverable as part of the same process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could guide the design of new unsupervised models that prioritize set-based recoveries over attempting full disentanglement from the start.
  • It offers a way to evaluate partial identifiability in practice on real data by checking consistency of recovered intersections and complements against domain knowledge.
  • Extensions to dynamic or graph-structured data might allow tracking how set relations among hidden factors evolve over time.

Load-bearing premise

The setup must contain sufficient structural diversity in the latent-to-observation links for the set operations to compose into full identifiability of every latent variable.

What would settle it

A synthetic dataset with deliberately low structural diversity where the set operations on latents fail to be recovered accurately from observations despite using the proposed inductive bias.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17568 by Andrew Gordon Wilson, Kun Zhang, Shunxing Fan, Yujia Zheng, Zijian Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of structure. Structure. The dependency structure between latent and observed variables, though hidden, captures the fundamental relationships underlying the data and is inherently nonparametric. To explore theoretical guarantees in general settings, this structure provides a natural starting point (Moran et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2022; Kivva et al., 2022). Before diving deep into the hidden rela… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of Defn. 5. Intuitively, set-theoretic indeterminacy guarantees that certain com￾ponents of the latent variables defined by basic set-theoretic opera￾tions are disentangled from the rest, with an example as: Example 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: , highlighting both its expressive power and practical utility. We begin with several interesting implications of the generalization: Proposition 1 (Implications of generalized identifiability). For any two models θ = (g, pZ) and ˆθ = (ˆg, pZˆ), if θ ∼set ˆθ, then for any two sets of observed variables XK and XV , and their corresponding latent index sets IK and IV , Zi is not a function of Zˆ π(j) for all… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: R2 in simulation. Setup. We follow the data generation process in Sec. 2. We employ the variational autoencoder as our backbone model with a dependency sparsity regularization in the objective function as: L = Eq(Z|X)[ln p(X|Z)] − βDKL(q(Z|X)||p(Z)) | {z } Evidence Lower Bound +α ∥Dzˆgˆ∥0 , where DKL is the Kullback–Leibler divergence, q(Z|X) the variational posterior, p(Z) the prior, p(X|Z) the like￾lihoo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MCC in simulation. Generalized Identifiability. We begin by evaluating gen￾eralized identifiability across groups of observed vari￾ables. We generate datasets with dimensionality in {3, 4, 5} and split the observed variables into two groups, XK and XV . For each dataset, we compute the R2 score, lower means more disentangled, between: (1) Int, IK ∩IV and IK∆IV ; (2) SymDiff, IK∆IV and IK ∩ IV ; and (3) Com… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Venn diagram example (Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Latent variable visualization on Fashion with Flow + Dependency Sparsity. From top to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Latent variable visualization on Shapes3D with EncDiff + Dependency Sparsity. From top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Latent variable visualization on Shapes3D with EncDiff + Dependency Sparsity. Top row: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Latent variable visualization on Cars3D with EncDiff + Dependency Sparsity. Top row: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Latent variable visualization on MPI3D with EncDiff + Dependency Sparsity. Top row: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Given only observational data $X = g(Z)$, where both the latent variables $Z$ and the generating process $g$ are unknown, recovering $Z$ is ill-posed without additional assumptions. Existing methods often assume linearity or rely on auxiliary supervision and functional constraints. However, such assumptions are rarely verifiable in practice, and most theoretical guarantees break down under even mild violations, leaving uncertainty about how to reliably understand the hidden world. To make identifiability actionable in the real-world scenarios, we take a complementary view: in the general settings where full identifiability is unattainable, what can still be recovered with guarantees, and what biases could be universally adopted? We introduce the problem of diverse dictionary learning to formalize this view. Specifically, we show that intersections, complements, and symmetric differences of latent variables linked to arbitrary observations, along with the latent-to-observed dependency structure, are still identifiable up to appropriate indeterminacies even without strong assumptions. These set-theoretic results can be composed using set algebra to construct structured and essential views of the hidden world, such as genus-differentia definitions. When sufficient structural diversity is present, they further imply full identifiability of all latent variables. Notably, all identifiability benefits follow from a simple inductive bias during estimation that can be readily integrated into most models. We validate the theory and demonstrate the benefits of the bias on both synthetic and real-world data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the diverse dictionary learning framework for recovering aspects of unknown latent variables Z from observations X = g(Z). It claims that intersections, complements, and symmetric differences of latent variables linked to observations, along with the latent-to-observed dependency structure, remain identifiable up to appropriate indeterminacies without strong assumptions on g or Z. These set-algebraic results can be composed to form structured views (e.g., genus-differentia definitions), and under a sufficient structural diversity condition they imply full identifiability of all latents. All benefits derive from a simple, model-agnostic inductive bias that can be added to existing estimators. The claims are supported by theoretical arguments and empirical validation on synthetic and real-world data.

Significance. If the identifiability theorems hold, the work provides a practical route to guaranteed partial recovery of latent structure in settings where full identifiability is impossible, using only a lightweight bias rather than unverifiable functional or linearity assumptions. The set-algebra composition approach is a genuine strength and could influence representation learning by enabling interpretable, composable views of the hidden world. The model-agnostic character of the bias is also a positive feature for broad applicability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory section (likely §3–4)] Theory section (likely §3–4): the central claim that intersections/complements/symmetric differences and the dependency structure are identifiable up to indeterminacies without strong assumptions is load-bearing; the manuscript must supply the key derivation steps or proof outline showing that the set-algebra operations do not introduce hidden functional assumptions or reduce to fitted parameters.
  2. [Diversity condition (abstract and corresponding theorem)] Diversity condition (abstract and corresponding theorem): the statement that 'sufficient structural diversity' yields full identifiability is load-bearing for the strongest claim; the paper needs an explicit, checkable criterion or bound for this condition so that readers can assess when the full-identifiability regime applies versus the partial-recovery regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Notation for the generating process g and the set operations on latents should be introduced with a single consistent diagram or table early in the paper to aid readability.
  2. [Experiments] The empirical section would benefit from an ablation that isolates the contribution of the diversity bias versus the base model on the reported metrics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential impact of the diverse dictionary learning framework. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theory section (likely §3–4)] Theory section (likely §3–4): the central claim that intersections/complements/symmetric differences and the dependency structure are identifiable up to indeterminacies without strong assumptions is load-bearing; the manuscript must supply the key derivation steps or proof outline showing that the set-algebra operations do not introduce hidden functional assumptions or reduce to fitted parameters.

    Authors: We agree that the central identifiability claims require a clearer exposition of the derivation steps. The current manuscript presents the set-algebraic results in §3–4 with supporting arguments, but we will revise the theory section to include an explicit proof outline. This outline will step through the recovery of intersections, complements, symmetric differences, and the dependency structure directly from the observational distribution of X, demonstrating that these operations rely solely on the set-theoretic structure induced by the diverse dictionary learning bias and introduce no additional functional assumptions on g or Z. The outline will also clarify that the recovered quantities are not fitted parameters but are determined up to the stated indeterminacies by the support patterns in the data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Diversity condition (abstract and corresponding theorem)] Diversity condition (abstract and corresponding theorem): the statement that 'sufficient structural diversity' yields full identifiability is load-bearing for the strongest claim; the paper needs an explicit, checkable criterion or bound for this condition so that readers can assess when the full-identifiability regime applies versus the partial-recovery regime.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the sufficient structural diversity condition, while stated in the abstract and formalized in the corresponding theorem, would benefit from a more explicit and checkable characterization. In the revision we will augment the theorem statement with a quantitative criterion expressed in terms of the minimal number and overlap pattern of observed supports required to guarantee that the set-algebraic operations span the full latent space. This criterion will allow readers to determine, for a given dataset, whether the full-identifiability regime or only the partial-recovery regime applies, without altering the qualitative nature of the original condition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on set-algebraic identifiability results for intersections, complements, symmetric differences, and latent-to-observed dependencies (up to indeterminacies) that hold without strong assumptions, with full identifiability only under an explicitly stated sufficient structural diversity condition. These follow from the introduced diverse dictionary learning formulation and a simple inductive bias during estimation. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce the claimed results to fitted parameters, self-citations, or definitional tautologies; the derivation is presented as following directly from the diversity bias and set operations. Validation on synthetic and real data is separate from the theoretical chain. The results are therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard set theory and identifiability concepts from prior literature, plus the new assumption of sufficient structural diversity; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly fitted or postulated beyond the framework name.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Set algebra operations (intersection, complement, symmetric difference) can be composed to construct structured views of latent variables.
    Invoked when stating that set-theoretic results can be composed using set algebra.
  • domain assumption A simple inductive bias toward diversity during estimation is sufficient to achieve the identifiability guarantees.
    Stated as the mechanism that delivers all identifiability benefits.
invented entities (1)
  • Diverse dictionary learning framework no independent evidence
    purpose: To formalize recovery of set operations on latent variables with guarantees under mild conditions.
    New problem formulation introduced to make identifiability actionable when full recovery is unattainable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1418 out tokens · 30043 ms · 2026-05-10T06:36:13.963968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Function classes for identifiable non- linear independent component analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06406,

    Simon Buchholz, Michel Besserve, and Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf. Function classes for identifiable non- linear independent component analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06406,

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Batchtopk sparse autoencoders

    Bart Bussmann, Patrick Leask, and Neel Nanda. Batchtopk sparse autoencoders. InNeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Scientific Methods for Understanding Deep Learning. Guangyi Chen, Yifan Shen, Zhenhao Chen, Xiangchen Song, Yuewen Sun, Weiran Yao, Xiao Liu, and Kun Zhang. Caring: Learning temporal causal representation under non-invertible generation process. InInter...

    2024

  3. [3]

    Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models

    Hoagy Cunningham, Aidan Ewart, Logan Riggs, Robert Huben, and Lee Sharkey. Sparse autoen- coders find highly interpretable features in language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08600,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    10 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Hermanni H¨alv¨a, Sylvain Le Corff, Luc Leh´ericy, Jonathan So, Yongjie Zhu, Elisabeth Gassiat, and Aapo Hyv ¨arinen

    doi: 10.1353/hph.1984.0001. 10 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Hermanni H¨alv¨a, Sylvain Le Corff, Luc Leh´ericy, Jonathan So, Yongjie Zhu, Elisabeth Gassiat, and Aapo Hyv ¨arinen. Disentangling identifiable features from noisy data with structured nonlinear ICA.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34,

    work page doi:10.1353/hph.1984.0001 1984

  5. [5]

    and Syrgkanis, V

    Jikai Jin and Vasilis Syrgkanis. Learning causal representations from general environments: Identi- fiability and intrinsic ambiguity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12267,

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 2010–2032,

    Lingjing Kong, Biwei Huang, Feng Xie, Eric Xing, Yuejie Chi, and Kun Zhang. Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 2010–2032,

    2010

  7. [7]

    Biscuit: Causal representation learning from binary interactions

    11 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Phillip Lippe, Sara Magliacane, Sindy L ¨owe, Yuki M Asano, Taco Cohen, and Efstratios Gavves. Biscuit: Causal representation learning from binary interactions. InUncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1263–1273. PMLR,

    2026

  8. [8]

    Towards interpretable deep generative models via causal representation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11609,

    Gemma E Moran and Bryon Aragam. Towards interpretable deep generative models via causal representation learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11609,

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Nanda, N., Lee, A., and Wattenberg, M

    Gemma E Moran, Dhanya Sridhar, Yixin Wang, and David M Blei. Identifiable variational autoen- coders via sparse decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.10804,

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Learning disentangled representa- tion by exploiting pretrained generative models: A contrastive learning view.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10543,

    Xuanchi Ren, Tao Yang, Yuwang Wang, and Wenjun Zeng. Learning disentangled representa- tion by exploiting pretrained generative models: A contrastive learning view.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10543,

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability

    Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson, Jack Lindsey, Jeff Wu, Lucius Bushnaq, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Stefan Heimersheim, Alejandro Ortega, Joseph Bloom, et al. Open problems in mechanistic interpretability.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16496,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  12. [12]

    Disentanglement by nonlinear ICA with general incompressible-flow networks (GIN).arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04872,

    Peter Sorrenson, Carsten Rother, and Ullrich K¨othe. Disentanglement by nonlinear ICA with general incompressible-flow networks (GIN).arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04872,

    work page arXiv 2001

  13. [13]

    Self-supervised learning with data augmentations provably isolates content from style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04619,

    Julius von K ¨ugelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel, Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf, Michel Besserve, and Francesco Locatello. Self-supervised learning with data augmentations provably isolates content from style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04619,

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Nonparametric identifiability of causal represen- tations from unknown interventions.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 48603–48638,

    12 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Julius von K¨ugelgen, Michel Besserve, Liang Wendong, Luigi Gresele, Armin Keki´c, Elias Barein- boim, David Blei, and Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf. Nonparametric identifiability of causal represen- tations from unknown interventions.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 48603–48638,

    2026

  15. [15]

    Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms

    Han Xiao, Kashif Rasul, and Roland V ollgraf. Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmark- ing machine learning algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  16. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05428 , year=

    Dingling Yao, Caroline Muller, and Francesco Locatello. Marrying causal representation learning with dynamical systems for science.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 71705–71736, 2024a. Dingling Yao, Danru Xu, S´ebastien Lachapelle, Sara Magliacane, Perouz Taslakian, Georg Martius, Julius von K ¨ugelgen, and Francesco Locatello. Multi-...

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    15 A.2 Proof of Theorem 1

    13 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Diverse Dictionary Learning Supplementary Material Table of Contents A Proofs 15 A.1 Proof of Proposition 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.2 Proof of Theorem 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 A.3 Proof of Theorem 2 . . . . . . . . . . . ....

    2026

  18. [18]

    1 holds and: i

    Suppose Assum. 1 holds and: i. The probability density ofZis positive inR dz; ii. (Sparsity regularization 6)∥D ˆZˆg∥0 ≤ ∥D Zg∥0. Then ifθ∼ obs ˆθ, we have generalized identifiability (Defn. 6), i.e.,θ∼ set ˆθ. Proof.Sinceθ∼ obs ˆθ, by the change-of-variable formula there must be ˆZ= ˆg−1 ◦g(Z) =ϕ(Z),(4) whereϕ= ˆg −1 ◦gis an invertible function and thusϕ...

    2026

  19. [19]

    This matching corresponds to a permutationπ∈S n such that (D ˆZϕ−1)j,π(j) ̸= 0,∀j∈ {1,2,

    SinceD ˆZϕ−1 is invertible, its rows are linearly independent, so for every subsetS⊆R, the corre- sponding rows have a nonzero determinant, implying that |{k∈C| ∃j∈S, D ˆZϕ−1 j,k ̸= 0}| ≥ |S|.(14) By Hall’s marriage theorem, there exists a perfect matching betweenRandC. This matching corresponds to a permutationπ∈S n such that (D ˆZϕ−1)j,π(j) ̸= 0,∀j∈ {1,...

    2026

  20. [20]

    Suppose assumptions in Thm. 1 hold. Ifθ∼ obs ˆθ, the support of the Jacobian matrixD ˆzˆgis identical to that ofDzg, up to a permutation of column indices. Proof.Sinceθ∼ obs ˆθ, by consideringϕ= ˆg −1 ◦gand the change-of-variable formula, we have ˆZ=ϕ(Z),(46) whereϕis an invertible function and thusϕ −1 exists. Therefore, according to the chain rule, we h...

    2026

  21. [21]

    This matching corresponds to a permutationπ∈S n such that (D ˆZϕ−1)j,π(j) ̸= 0,∀j∈ {1,2,

    SinceD ˆZϕ−1 is invertible, its rows are linearly independent, so for every subsetS⊆R, the corre- sponding rows have a nonzero determinant, implying that |{k∈C| ∃j∈S, D ˆZϕ−1 j,k ̸= 0}| ≥ |S|.(56) By Hall’s marriage theorem, there exists a perfect matching betweenRandC. This matching corresponds to a permutationπ∈S n such that (D ˆZϕ−1)j,π(j) ̸= 0,∀j∈ {1,...

    2026

  22. [22]

    Supposer∈( S Xj ∈A\{Xk} Ij)\I k

    We begin with the first condition: there exists a set of observed variablesAand an elementX k ∈Asuch that [ Xj ∈A Ij = [dz],andI k \ [ Xj ∈A\{Xk} Ij ={i}.(66) Our want to show that, for any otherr̸=i, we have ∂Zi ∂ ˆZπ(r) = 0.(67) We consider two cases: •r∈( S Xj ∈A\{Xk} Ij)\I k; •r∈( S Xj ∈A\{Xk} Ij)∩I k. Supposer∈( S Xj ∈A\{Xk} Ij)\I k. Let us denoteJ A...

    2026

  23. [23]

    Suppose for each row inM ϕ, there are more than one non-zero element

    That part of proof directly follows from (Lachapelle et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2022). Suppose for each row inM ϕ, there are more than one non-zero element. Then ∃j1 ̸=j 2, Mϕj1,· ∩M ϕj2,· ̸=∅.(106) Then considerj 3 ∈[d z]such that π(j3)∈M ϕj1,· ∩M ϕj2,·.(107) Sincej 1 ̸=j 3, it is eitherj 3 ̸=j 1 orj 3 ̸=j

    2022

  24. [24]

    Since we have \ Xj ∈Aj1 Ij =j 1,(108) there must existsX i3 ∈A j1 such thatj 3 ̸=I i3. Becausej 1 ∈I i3, we have (i3, j1)∈supp(D Zg),(109) which further implies Mϕj1,· ∈span{e ′ k :k ′ ∈supp((D ˆZˆg)i3,·)}.(110) 23 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 Given Eq. (107), it implies π(j3)∈supp(D ˆZˆg)i3,·.(111) This, again, implies j3 ∈supp(D Zg)i3,·,...

    2026

  25. [25]

    All indices outsideAbelong toI 2 orI 3 (or both), soAis disentangled

    Nowi∈I K \I V and every j∈I 3 is inI V \I K, again case (iii). All indices outsideAbelong toI 2 orI 3 (or both), soAis disentangled. (ii)I 2 \(I 1 ∪I 3)Symmetric to (i) with the roles of(1,2)and(2,1)swapped: use(X K, XV ) = (X2, X1)and(X 2, X3). (iii)I 3 \(I 1 ∪I 2)Symmetric to (i): use(X K, XV ) = (X3, X1)and(X 3, X2). (iv)(I 1 ∩I 2)\I 3 This is the work...

    2026

  26. [26]

    These results, together with the comprehensive experiments in (Farnik et al., 2025), further sup- port the advantages of dependency sparsity, demonstrating that it not only yields more interpretable representations but also preserves active and meaningful latent features more effectively. B.4 FURTHER DISCUSSION ON SUFFICIENT NONLIENARITY The sufficient no...

    2025

  27. [27]

    shows that dependency sparsity regularization remains practical even at scale up to common LLMs when combined with two standard strategies. 27 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 •Apply latent sparsity first.Large models often have high dimensional latent spaces, but for any given input, many latent coordinates are inactive or irrelevant. A commo...

    2026

  28. [28]

    The main difficulty is separating noise from latent variables, since in the general form they can be entangled in complex ways

    and recent nonparametric work (Hyv ¨arinen et al., 2024). The main difficulty is separating noise from latent variables, since in the general form they can be entangled in complex ways. Recent work (Zheng et al., 2025), based on the Hu-Schennach theorem (Hu & Schennach, 2008), shows that general noise can be separated under additional assumptions on the g...

    2024

  29. [29]

    Of course, the list is non-exclusive, and will only grow faster given the development of large-scale models

    and genomics (Morioka & Hyvarinen, 2024). Of course, the list is non-exclusive, and will only grow faster given the development of large-scale models. The reason is simple: even with infinite data and computation, without identifiability, mod- els may achieve perfect predictions but cannot be guaranteed to recover the underlying truth. Thus, the closer we...

    2024

  30. [30]

    Neither provides identifiability guarantees in the non- parametric setting

    and the Hessian Penalty (Peebles et al., 2020). Neither provides identifiability guarantees in the non- parametric setting. Empirically, both underperform our method, with a widening gap asdincreases. This indicates that penalizing the dependency map in a structural way improves recovery of the true latent factors. Noise robustness.Remark 1 states that ou...

    2020

  31. [31]

    Individual latent coordinates correspond cleanly to gender, heel height, and upper width, with minimal interference across factors

    with Flow. Individual latent coordinates correspond cleanly to gender, heel height, and upper width, with minimal interference across factors. The Shapes3D traversals in Figure 8 (EncDiff) show similarly sharp control, disentangling wall angle, wall color, object shape, and object color. These traversals illustrate that dependency sparsity yields latent a...

    2026