pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17605 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Recognition: unknown

Achromatic optics using nonlinear plasma lenses for beam-quality preservation between plasma-accelerator stages

C. A. Lindstr{\o}m , E. Adli , J. B. B. Chen , P. Drobniak , A. Huebl , D. Kalvik , C. E. Mitchell , F. Pe\~na
show 1 more author
K. N. Sjobak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords plasma accelerator stagingachromatic opticsnonlinear plasma lensemittance preservationchromatic aberrationbeam transportR56 tuningenergy bandwidth
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear plasma lenses create a compact achromatic lattice that preserves emittance for energy spreads of several percent in plasma-accelerator staging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes arranging nonlinear plasma lenses into a lattice that transports beams between plasma accelerator stages without chromatic aberrations. This setup maintains beam emittance even when energy spreads reach several percent and includes a tunable R56 for controlling bunch length or enabling self-correction. Analytical and numerical models show the lattice is half as long and has twice the energy bandwidth of a quadrupole-sextupole magnet system while using fewer elements. The design also scales all lengths with the square root of energy to reach TeV scales while reducing synchrotron radiation effects.

Core claim

A lattice of nonlinear plasma lenses cancels chromatic aberrations from high beam divergence and energy spread, allowing emittance-preserving transport between plasma stages. The lattice provides tunable R56 and outperforms a quadrupole-sextupole alternative by being half the length with twice the energy bandwidth. Performance is verified through analytic and numeric modeling, and the approach extends to TeV energies by scaling lengths with the square root of beam energy while mitigating coherent and incoherent synchrotron radiation.

What carries the argument

The nonlinear plasma lens, which supplies energy-dependent focusing to compensate chromatic effects in divergent beams from plasma accelerators.

Load-bearing premise

Nonlinear plasma lenses can be realized with exactly the required energy-dependent focusing without adding unmodeled aberrations, instabilities, or plasma complications.

What would settle it

An experiment that either shows emittance preservation through the plasma-lens lattice for a beam with several-percent energy spread or reveals degradation from effects outside the analytic and numeric models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17605 by A. Huebl, C. A. Lindstr{\o}m, C. E. Mitchell, D. Kalvik, E. Adli, F. Pe\~na, J. B. B. Chen, K. N. Sjobak, P. Drobniak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the magnetic field profile in a linear (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top view of the achromatic staging optics based on nonlinear plasma lenses, here refocusing a 10 GeV beam in 6 m. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Achromatic staging optics at 10 GeV, matching to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Working principle of the achromatic staging optics, showing the elements, orbit (solid lines) and beam-size variation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Simulated evolution of beam qualities for the staging [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Top view of the quadrupole- and sextupole-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Achromatic staging optics using quadrupoles and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of beam qualities in the quadrupole- and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Emittance growth due to chromaticity in the hor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Effect of an energy offset on Twiss parameters (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Emittance growth in the horizontal (a,b) and vertical plane (c,d) from geometric aberrations in the nonlinear plasma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Emittance growth from misalignment of the plasma lenses and central sextupole, simulated at 10 GeV, indicating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Simulated effect of coherent synchrotron radiation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Energy scaling, showing the simulated effect of CSR and ISR on various beam parameters (a–e) based on scaled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Plasma acceleration promises to deliver high-energy particle beams by combining, or staging, several low- or medium-energy accelerator stages. However, chromatic aberrations from the combination of high divergence and energy spread make it nontrivial to transport beams between plasma-accelerator stages. This paper describes a compact and achromatic lattice optimized for staging, based on a new beam-optics element; a nonlinear plasma lens. The lattice preserves emittance for energy spreads up to several percent and has a tunable $R_{56}$ that enables bunch-length preservation or a longitudinal self-correction mechanism. The performance and limitations of the plasma-lens-based solution are modeled analytically and numerically, and compared to a more conventional yet novel solution based on quadrupole and sextupole magnets. While functional, the latter is double the length, has about twice the number of elements and a narrower energy bandwidth. Lastly, a solution for scaling to TeV energies is described, in which all lengths scale with the square root of the energy and the deleterious effects of coherent and incoherent synchrotron radiation are mitigated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a compact achromatic transport lattice for plasma-accelerator staging that uses a new nonlinear plasma lens element to cancel chromatic aberrations. It claims analytic and numerical modeling shows emittance preservation for energy spreads up to several percent, a tunable R56 for bunch-length control or self-correction, and superior performance (half the length, twice the energy bandwidth, fewer elements) compared with a quadrupole-sextupole magnet lattice; a sqrt(E) scaling solution for TeV energies is also outlined.

Significance. If the idealized nonlinear plasma lens can be realized without unmodeled aberrations or instabilities, the work would offer a shorter, more robust inter-stage optic that relaxes the energy-spread requirement on plasma stages and could accelerate progress toward multi-stage plasma accelerators. The analytic transport matrices, direct numerical tracking, and explicit comparison to a conventional alternative are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [analytic transport matrices and numerical tracking] The emittance-preservation result for several-percent energy spreads (abstract and modeling sections) is derived under the assumption that the nonlinear focusing coefficient exactly cancels chromatic terms with no residual aberrations; the analytic matrices and tracking therefore omit beam-induced plasma perturbations, density fluctuations, and wakefield effects that would break this cancellation at realistic currents.
  2. [comparison to quadrupole-sextupole lattice] The claim that the plasma-lens lattice has twice the energy bandwidth of the magnet alternative (comparison section) is load-bearing for the headline advantage, yet the bandwidth definition, the precise energy-spread values at which emittance growth begins, and the quantitative R56 tunability range are not cross-checked against the same figure of merit in both lattices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [TeV scaling section] The abstract states lengths scale with the square root of energy for TeV operation, but the scaling derivation and the mitigation of coherent/incoherent synchrotron radiation should be shown explicitly with the relevant equations.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the nonlinear focusing coefficient and the plasma density profile used to derive it should be defined once and used consistently; a short table of the free parameters would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of our modeling assumptions and the need for consistent metrics in comparisons. We address both points below and will incorporate clarifications and revisions into the updated manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [analytic transport matrices and numerical tracking] The emittance-preservation result for several-percent energy spreads (abstract and modeling sections) is derived under the assumption that the nonlinear focusing coefficient exactly cancels chromatic terms with no residual aberrations; the analytic matrices and tracking therefore omit beam-induced plasma perturbations, density fluctuations, and wakefield effects that would break this cancellation at realistic currents.

    Authors: We agree that the analytic transport matrices and numerical tracking assume an idealized nonlinear plasma lens with exact cancellation of chromatic terms and no residual aberrations from beam-induced effects. The manuscript is scoped to demonstrate the optics principle and its potential under these assumptions, as full inclusion of plasma perturbations would require coupled PIC-beam tracking simulations outside the present focus. In the revised version, we will add a new subsection in the discussion explicitly stating these limitations, noting the applicability to low-current regimes where such effects remain small, and citing relevant work on plasma lens stability and wakefields. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [comparison to quadrupole-sextupole lattice] The claim that the plasma-lens lattice has twice the energy bandwidth of the magnet alternative (comparison section) is load-bearing for the headline advantage, yet the bandwidth definition, the precise energy-spread values at which emittance growth begins, and the quantitative R56 tunability range are not cross-checked against the same figure of merit in both lattices.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for fully consistent metrics. The original comparison used emittance preservation as the primary criterion for both lattices, but the exact growth thresholds and R56 quantification were not aligned in presentation. We will revise the comparison section to adopt a single, explicitly defined figure of merit (normalized emittance growth below 5%), tabulate the precise energy-spread thresholds at which growth begins for each lattice, and report the R56 tunability range using identical analysis methods. This will make the performance claims directly comparable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward analytic and numerical modeling of a proposed lattice element

full rationale

The paper constructs an achromatic lattice by proposing a nonlinear plasma lens element whose energy-dependent focusing is derived from an idealized plasma density profile. Analytic transport matrices and numerical tracking are then applied to demonstrate emittance preservation and tunable R56 for given energy spreads. These steps are self-contained forward calculations that do not reduce to fitted parameters extracted from the same dataset, self-definitional relations, or load-bearing self-citations. The comparison to a quadrupole-sextupole alternative and the TeV scaling discussion are likewise independent modeling exercises. No quoted equation or derivation collapses to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the existence and accurate modelability of nonlinear plasma lenses whose focusing properties are assumed to be controllable and free of unmodeled side effects; these are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)
  • nonlinear focusing coefficient
    The strength and energy dependence of the plasma lens focusing must be chosen or fitted to cancel chromatic aberrations in the lattice design.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nonlinear plasma lenses can be engineered to provide the precise energy-dependent focusing needed for achromatic transport
    This is the foundational premise for the entire lattice and is not derived within the work.
invented entities (1)
  • nonlinear plasma lens no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as a compact, energy-dependent focusing element that enables achromatic beam transport
    Presented as a new beam-optics element introduced in this paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 1430 out tokens · 54502 ms · 2026-05-10T04:50:33.690053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    If we were using linear (i.e., chro- matic) plasma lenses in the lattice, this would imply a chromaticity of ∆W≈(L/β 0)(1 +L/l), or 1.45(L/β0) in the given example

    Canceling first-order chromaticity Starting from zero chromaticity, the chromatic ampli- tude increases in a linear-optics element approximately as ∆W≈β lens/flens. If we were using linear (i.e., chro- matic) plasma lenses in the lattice, this would imply a chromaticity of ∆W≈(L/β 0)(1 +L/l), or 1.45(L/β0) in the given example. Since there is a 180 ◦ phas...

  2. [2]

    While the second-order dispersion does not need to be canceled if the energy spread is small, it may be required for energy spreads above 1% rms

    Canceling second-order dispersion Finally, the second-order dispersion is affected by both dipoles and plasma lenses; here also the nonlinearityτ x matters. While the second-order dispersion does not need to be canceled if the energy spread is small, it may be required for energy spreads above 1% rms. To cancel the second-order dispersion, we wish to use ...

  3. [3]

    For pedagogical purposes, therefore, we have included Fig

    Visualizing the evolution in 6D phase space The complex and interwoven operation of the achro- matic lattice is not straightforward to understand. For pedagogical purposes, therefore, we have included Fig. 4 to visualize the evolution of the beam throughout the lat- tice. The beam orbit and size is shown for three different energy slices, and the distribu...

  4. [4]

    inner route

    Preservation of emittance and other beam qualities The ultimate goal of the staging optics is to trans- port beams from a plasma accelerator without degrad- ing beam qualities. Figure 5 shows the evolution of the transverse emittances, bunch length and energy spread. The horizontal emittance increases dramatically due to the introduction of a large horizo...

  5. [5]

    TunableR 56 While the standard solution presented in this paper has zeroR 56, it is a key feature that the lattice should have a tunableR 56, in particular to negative values as required for the longitudinal self-correction mechanism [32]. Fig- ure 6 highlights this capability, showing that for the staging lattice presented, longitudinal dispersions from ...

  6. [6]

    Transporting this particle through the drifts and applying the nonlinear kicks in the plasma lenses, and finally averaging over a Gaussian beam dis- tribution in phase space (see Appendix D for the full derivation), we estimate relative emittance growths ∆εnx εnx ≈ τ 2 x L3 β2 0 γ 1 + L l l L + 1 q 6ε2nx + 18ε2ny(29) ∆εny εny ≈ τ 2 x L3 β2 0 γ 1 + L l l L...

  7. [7]

    However, the plasma lenses are typi- cally too short for multiple Coulomb scattering events to occur

    Coulomb scattering If there are multiple Coulomb scattering events, the expected emittance growth is given by [59–61] ∆εn ≈0.83r 2 e βlensLlens γ nlensZ(Z+ 1) ln 287√ Z , (36) wherer e is the classical electron radius,Zis the atomic number of the gas species,β lens is the beta function inside the plasma lens, andL lens andn lens are its length and atomic ...

  8. [8]

    locked in

    Distortion from wakefield focusing In an active plasma lens, if the beam density is suffi- ciently high, it can drive a plasma wake whose transverse focusing forces compete with the lens field, causing dis- tortion and possibly emittance growth [49, 58]. However, this does not apply to passive plasma lenses, as these al- ready rely on a plasma wakefield (...

  9. [9]

    In the plasma lenses, a kick is applied based on the particle position, but at this loca- tion the position is dominated by the angles and not the initial position; e.g., in the first lensx 0 +x ′ 0L→x ′ 0L. The angle term dominates because for a matched beam ⟨x0⟩/⟨x′ 0⟩=β 0 and in our setup we assumeβ 0 ≪L(and hencex 0 ≪x ′ 0L), which is the reason why c...

  10. [10]

    +O(τ 3 x) y3 =−τ 2 x L3 1 + L l l L + 1 y′ 0(3x′ 0 2 +y ′ 0

  11. [11]

    The final angles are the same as after the second lens, i.e.x ′ 3 =x ′ 2 andy ′ 3 =y ′

    +O(τ 3 x). The final angles are the same as after the second lens, i.e.x ′ 3 =x ′ 2 andy ′ 3 =y ′

  12. [12]

    Starting with the assumption that the initial distri- butions in all phase-space variables (x 0,y 0,x ′ 0,y ′

    This shows that the−Itrans- form does indeed cancel the geometric effects to first or- der in the final offset [i.e., there is noO(τ x) term], but not on the final angle (which indeed has aO(τ x) term). Starting with the assumption that the initial distri- butions in all phase-space variables (x 0,y 0,x ′ 0,y ′

  13. [13]

    are Gaussian, we can estimate the rms geometric emittance (first in the horizontal plane only) to be εx = q ⟨x2 3⟩⟨x′ 3 2⟩ − ⟨x3x′ 3⟩2 ≈ q ⟨(x0 + ∆x)2⟩⟨x′ 0 2⟩ − ⟨(x0 + ∆x)x′ 0⟩2 ≈ r ⟨x2 0⟩⟨x′ 0 2⟩ − ⟨x0x′ 0⟩2 + ⟨∆x2⟩⟨x′ 0 2⟩ − ⟨∆xx′ 0⟩2 ≈ r ε2 x0 + ⟨∆x2⟩⟨x′ 0 2⟩ − ⟨∆xx′ 0⟩2 ≡ q ε2 x0 + ∆ε2x, where in the second step, we make use of the finding that the i...

  14. [14]

    + ∆2 2 −2∆ 1∆2 2l L −1 + ∆2 1 2l L −1 2! 1 L + 1 l 2 (E8) ≈ γ 2β0 (∆2 1 + 2∆1∆2 + ∆2 2) 1 + L l 2 ,(E9) where the final approximation assumes thatβ 0 ≪L. Further, we can assume that the offset of the first and second lens are random, normally distributed with the same rmsσ ∆x = p ⟨∆1⟩= p ⟨∆2⟩, and not correlated with each other (i.e., cross terms ∆ 1∆2 va...

  15. [15]

    Esarey, C

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1229 (2009)

    2009

  16. [16]

    C. A. Lindstrøm, S. Corde, R. D’Arcy, S. Gess- ner, M. Gilljohann, M. J. Hogan, J. Osterhoff, Beam-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration, preprint at arXiv:2504.05558

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    M. J. Hogan, C. D. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, F. J. Decker, S. Deng, P. Emmaet al., Multi-GeV energy gain in a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 054802 (2005)

    2005

  18. [18]

    W. P. Leemans, B. Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, Cs. T´ oth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder and S. M. Hooker, GeV electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator, Nat. Phys.2, 696 (2006)

    2006

  19. [19]

    Grudiev, S

    A. Grudiev, S. Calatroni and W. Wuensch, New local field quantity describing the high gradient limit of ac- celerating structures, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams12, 102001 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Joshi and T

    C. Joshi and T. Katsouleas, Plasma accelerators at the energy frontier and on tabletops, Phys. Today56, 6, 47 (2003)

    2003

  21. [21]

    Tajima and J

    T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Laser electron accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 267 (1979)

    1979

  22. [22]

    V. I. Veksler, Coherent principle of acceleration of charged particles, Proceedings of the CERN Symposium on High Energy Accelerators and Pion Physics, pp. 80–83 (1956)

    1956

  23. [23]

    Ya. B. Fainberg, The use of plasma waveguides as accel- erating structures in linear accelerators, Proceedings of the CERN Symposium on High Energy Accelerators and Pion Physics, pp. 84–90 (1956)

    1956

  24. [25]

    P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, R. W. Huff and T. Katsouleas, Acceleration of Electrons by the Interaction of a Bunched Electron Beam with a Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 693 (1985)

    1985

  25. [26]

    M. J. Hogan, C. E. Clayton, C. Huang, P. Muggli, S. Wang, B. E. Blueet al., Ultrarelativistic-positron-beam transport through meter-scale plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 205002 (2003)

    2003

  26. [27]

    Muggli, B

    P. Muggli, B. E. Blue, C. E. Clayton, S. Deng, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hoganet al., Meter-scale plasma-wakefield accelerator driven by a matched electron beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 014802 (2004)

    2004

  27. [28]

    Steinkeet al., Multistage coupling of independent laser-plasma accelerators, Nature (London)530, 190 (2016)

    S. Steinkeet al., Multistage coupling of independent laser-plasma accelerators, Nature (London)530, 190 (2016)

    2016

  28. [29]

    C. A. Lindstrøm, Staging of plasma-wakefield accelera- 25 tors, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams24, 014801 (2021)

    2021

  29. [30]

    Litoset al., 9 GeV energy gain in a beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator, Plasma Phys

    M. Litoset al., 9 GeV energy gain in a beam-driven plasma wakefield accelerator, Plasma Phys. Control. Fu- sion58, 034017 (2016)

    2016

  30. [31]

    Gonsalveset al., Petawatt laser guiding and elec- tron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capil- lary discharge waveguide, Phys

    A. Gonsalveset al., Petawatt laser guiding and elec- tron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capil- lary discharge waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 084801 (2019)

    2019

  31. [32]

    Picksleyet al., Matched guiding and controlled injec- tion in dark-current-free, 10-GeV-class, channel-guided laser-plasma accelerators, Phys

    A. Picksleyet al., Matched guiding and controlled injec- tion in dark-current-free, 10-GeV-class, channel-guided laser-plasma accelerators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 255001 (2024)

    2024

  32. [33]

    Adli and P

    E. Adli and P. Muggli, Proton-Beam-Driven Plasma Ac- celeration, Rev. Accel. Sci. Tech.9, 85–104 (2016)

    2016

  33. [34]

    Adliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Acceleration of electrons in the plasma wakefield of a proton bunch, Na- ture (London)561, 363–367 (2018)

    E. Adliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Acceleration of electrons in the plasma wakefield of a proton bunch, Na- ture (London)561, 363–367 (2018)

    2018

  34. [35]

    Farmer, A

    J. Farmer, A. Caldwell and A. Pukhov, Preliminary in- vestigation of a higgs factory based on proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration, New J. Phys.26, 113011 (2024)

    2024

  35. [36]

    D’Arcyet al., Recovery time of a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Nature (London)603, 58–62 (2022)

    R. D’Arcyet al., Recovery time of a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Nature (London)603, 58–62 (2022)

    2022

  36. [37]

    Litoset al., High-efficiency acceleration of an electron beam in a plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature (London) 515, 92–95 (2014)

    M. Litoset al., High-efficiency acceleration of an electron beam in a plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature (London) 515, 92–95 (2014)

    2014

  37. [38]

    C. A. Lindstrømet al., Energy-spread preservation and high efficiency in a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 014801 (2021)

    2021

  38. [39]

    Rosenzweig, N

    J. Rosenzweig, N. Barov, A. Murokh, E. Colby and P. Colestock, Towards a plasma wake-field acceleration- based linear collider, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A410, 532–543 (1998)

    1998

  39. [40]

    Seryi, M

    A. Seryi, M. J. Hogan, S. Pei, T. Raubenheimer, P. Tenenbaum, T. Katsouleas, C. Huang, C. Joshi, W. Mori, and P. Muggli, A concept of plasma wake field accelera- tion linear collider (PWFA-LC),Proceedings of PAC09, Vancouver, BC, Canada(JACoW, Geneva, 2009), pp. 2688–2690

    2009

  40. [41]

    Adli, J.-P

    E. Adli, J.-P. Delahaye, S. J. Gessner, M. J. Hogan, T. O. Raubenheimer, W. An, C. Joshi, and W. B. Mori, A beam driven plasma-wakefield linear collider: from Higgs factory to multi-TeV, SLAC Report No. SLAC- PUB-15426, 2013

    2013

  41. [42]

    Foster, R

    B. Foster, R. D’Arcy and C. A. Lindstrøm, A hy- brid, asymmetric, linear Higgs factory based on plasma- wakefield and radio-frequency acceleration, New J. Phys. 25, 093037 (2023)

    2023

  42. [43]

    Fosteret al., Proceedings of the Erice workshop: A new baseline for the hybrid, asymmetric, linear Higgs factory HALHF, Phys

    B. Fosteret al., Proceedings of the Erice workshop: A new baseline for the hybrid, asymmetric, linear Higgs factory HALHF, Phys. Open23, 100261 (2025)

    2025

  43. [44]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045001 (2022)

    2022

  44. [45]

    C. A. Lindstrømet al., The SPARTA project: toward a demonstrator facility for multistage plasma accelera- tion, Proceedings of IPAC’25 (Taipei, Taiwan, 2025), pp. 1615–1618

    2025

  45. [46]

    C. A. Lindstrøm, Self-correcting longitudinal phase space in a multistage plasma accelerator, preprint at arXiv:2104.14460

    work page arXiv

  46. [47]

    Antici, A

    P. Antici, A. Bacci, C. Benedetti, E. Chiadroni, M. Fer- rario, A. R. Rossiet al., Laser-driven electron beamlines generated by coupling laser-plasma sources with conven- tional transport systems, J. Appl. Phys.112, 044902 (2012)

    2012

  47. [48]

    Migliorati, A

    M. Migliorati, A. Bacci, C. Benedetti, E. Chiadroni, M. Ferrario, A. Mostacci, L. Palumbo, A. R. Rossi, L. Ser- afini and P. Antici, Intrinsic normalized emittance growth in laser-driven electron accelerators, Phys. Rev. ST Ac- cel. Beams16, 011302 (2013)

    2013

  48. [49]

    B. W. Montague, Linear optics for improved chromaticity correction, LEP Note 165 (CERN, Geneva, 1979)

    1979

  49. [50]

    C. A. Lindstrøm and E. Adli, Design of general apoc- hromatic drift-quadrupole beam lines, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams19, 071002 (2016)

    2016

  50. [51]

    Pe˜ naet al., Energy depletion and re-acceleration of driver electrons in a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Phys

    F. Pe˜ naet al., Energy depletion and re-acceleration of driver electrons in a plasma-wakefield accelerator, Phys. Rev. Research6, 043090 (2024)

    2024

  51. [52]

    Thauryet al., Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics, Nat

    C. Thauryet al., Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics, Nat. Phys.3, 424–429 (2007)

    2007

  52. [53]

    Zingaleet al., Emittance preserving thin film plasma mirrors for GeV scale laser plasma accelerators, Phys

    A. Zingaleet al., Emittance preserving thin film plasma mirrors for GeV scale laser plasma accelerators, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams24, 121301 (2021)

    2021

  53. [54]

    B. W. Montague and F. Ruggiero, Apochromatic focus- ing for linear colliders,CLIC Note 37(CERN, Geneva, 1987)

    1987

  54. [55]

    Raimondi and A

    P. Raimondi and A. Seryi, Novel final focus design for future linear colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 3779 (2001)

    2001

  55. [56]

    G. R. Whiteet al.(ATF2 Collaboration), Experimental validation of a novel compact focusing scheme for future energy-frontier linear lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 034802 (2014)

    2014

  56. [57]

    Nakanishiet al., Direct observation of plasma-lens ef- fect, Phys

    H. Nakanishiet al., Direct observation of plasma-lens ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1870–1873 (1991)

    1991

  57. [58]

    J. S. T. Nget al., Observation of plasma focusing of a 28.5 GeV positron beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 244801 (2001)

    2001

  58. [59]

    Marocchinoet al., Experimental characterization of the effects induced by passive plasma lens on high bright- ness electron bunches, Appl

    A. Marocchinoet al., Experimental characterization of the effects induced by passive plasma lens on high bright- ness electron bunches, Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 184101 (2017)

    2017

  59. [60]

    C. E. Dosset al., Laser-ionized, beam-driven, under- dense, passive thin plasma lens, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, 111001 (2019)

    2019

  60. [61]

    W. K. H. Panofsky and W. R. Baker, A focusing device for the external 350-MeV proton beam of the 184-inch cyclotron at Berkeley, Rev. Sci. Instrum.21, 445–447 (1950)

    1950

  61. [62]

    van Tilborget al., Active plasma lensing for relativis- tic laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams, Phys

    J. van Tilborget al., Active plasma lensing for relativis- tic laser-plasma-accelerated electron beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 184802 (2015)

    2015

  62. [63]

    Pompiliet al., Focusing of high-brightness electron beams with active-plasma lenses, Phys

    R. Pompiliet al., Focusing of high-brightness electron beams with active-plasma lenses, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 174801 (2018)

    2018

  63. [64]

    C. A. Lindstrømet al., Emittance preservation in an aberration-free active plasma lens, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 194801 (2018)

    2018

  64. [65]

    K. N. Sjobaket al., Strong focusing gradient in a linear active plasma lens, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams24, 121306 (2021)

    2021

  65. [66]

    van Tilborg, S

    J. van Tilborg, S. K. Barber, C. Benedetti, C. B. Schroeder, F. Isono, H.-E. Tsai, C. G. R. Geddes and W. P. Leemans, Comparative study of active plasma lenses in high-quality electron accelerator transport lines, Phys. Plasmas25, 056702 (2018)

    2018

  66. [67]

    C. E. Dosset al., Underdense plasma lens with a trans- 26 verse density gradient, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams26, 031302 (2023)

    2023

  67. [68]

    Drobniak, E

    P. Drobniak, E. Adli, H. Bergravf Anderson, A. Dyson, S. M. Mewes, K. N. Sjobak, M. Th´ evenet, C. A. Lindstrøm, Development of a nonlinear plasma lens for achromatic beam transport, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1072, 170223 (2025)

    2025

  68. [69]

    Drobniak, E

    P. Drobniak, E. Adli, H. Bergravf Anderson, K. N. Sjobak, C. A. Lindstrøm, A. Dyson, S. M. Mewes, M. Th´ evenet, Preliminary results from the CLEAR non- linear plasma lens experiment, Proceedings of IPAC’25 (Taipei, Taiwan, 2025), pp. 655–658

    2025

  69. [70]

    W. B. Kunkel, Hall effect in a plasma, Am. J. Phys.49, 733–738 (1981)

    1981

  70. [71]

    J. R. Davieset al., Transport coefficients for magnetic- field evolution in inviscid magnetohydrodynamics, Phys. Plasmas28, 012305 (2021)

    2021

  71. [72]

    C. A. Lindstrøm and E. Adli, Analytic plasma wakefield limits for active plasma lenses, arXiv:1802.02750 (2018)

    work page arXiv 2018

  72. [73]

    B. W. Montague, Emittance growth from multiple scat- tering in the plasma beat-wave accelerator, inThe Gen- eration of High Fields for Particle Acceleration to Very- high Energies: Proceedings of the CAS-ECFA-INFN Workshop, pp. 208–218 (CERN, Geneva, 1985)

    1985

  73. [74]

    Y. Zhao, R. Lehe, A. Myers, M. Th´ evenet, A. Huebl, C. B. Schroeder, J.-L. Vay, Modeling of emittance growth due to Coulomb collisions in plasma-based accelerators, Phys. Plasmas 27, 113105 (2020)

    2020

  74. [75]

    Y. Zhao, R. Lehe, A. Myers, M. Th´ evenet, A. Huebl, C. B. Schroeder, J.-L. Vay, Plasma electron contribu- tion to beam emittance growth from Coulomb collisions in plasma-based accelerators, Phys. Plasmas 29, 103109 (2022)

    2022

  75. [76]

    K. A. Marshet al., Beam matching to a plasma wake field accelerator using a ramped density profile at the plasma boundary,Proceedings of PAC2005, Knoxville, TN, USA (JACoW, Geneva, 2005), p. 2702

    2005

  76. [77]

    Dornmair, K

    I. Dornmair, K. Floettmann and A. R. Maier, Emittance conservation by tailored focusing profiles in a plasma ac- celerator, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams18, 041302 (2015)

    2015

  77. [78]

    Ariniello, C

    R. Ariniello, C. E. Doss, K. Hunt-Stone, J. R. Cary and M. D. Litos, Transverse beam dynamics in a plasma den- sity ramp, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22, 041304 (2019)

    2019

  78. [79]

    J. B. B. Chenet al., ABEL: The Adaptable Beginning- to-End Linac simulation framework, Proceedings of IPAC’25 (Taipei, Taiwan, 2025), pp. 1438–1441

    2025

  79. [80]

    Hueblet al., Next Generation Computational Tools for the Modeling and Design of Particle Accelerators at Exascale, Proceedings of NAPAC’22 (Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2022), pp

    A. Hueblet al., Next Generation Computational Tools for the Modeling and Design of Particle Accelerators at Exascale, Proceedings of NAPAC’22 (Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2022), pp. 302–306

    2022

  80. [81]

    All analysis and simulation scripts have been deposited athttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19592228

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19592228

Showing first 80 references.