arxiv: 2604.17724 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Very Long-periodic Pulsations in Solar Metrewave Bursts: Implications for their Origins

Dong Li , Lei Lu , Jingye Yan , Xinhua Zhao , Bing Wang , Chengming Tan , Jianping Li , Zongjun Ning

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR

keywords type-I solar radio burstsvery long-periodic pulsationsslow magnetoacoustic wavessunspot umbraeplasma emissioncoronal loopsmetric wavebandfrequency drift

0 comments

The pith

Slow magnetoacoustic waves from sunspot umbrae modulate very long-periodic pulsations in solar radio bursts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines very long-periodic pulsations in type-I solar metrewave bursts observed on February 14, 2024. Using radio dynamic spectra from multiple instruments and imaging from SDO, it identifies a ~160 s period in the bursts and a ~170 s period in sunspot umbrae and connecting coronal loops. The bursts show high brightness temperature and circular polarization, occurring above regions of emerging magnetic flux. The authors argue that these observations indicate plasma emission as the mechanism for the bursts, with the pulsations resulting from modulation by slow magnetoacoustic waves originating in the sunspots. Such a link would explain the frequency drifts as due to density changes along the loops.

Core claim

Seven successive pulsation structures in metric radio bursts exhibit a quasi-period of approximately 160 seconds in the 210-280 MHz range. These occur above two groups of sunspot umbrae linked by coronal loops, where a similar ~170 s period is seen. The strong polarization and brightness, plus density estimates matching the frequencies, support that plasma emission generates the type-I bursts, modulated by slow magnetoacoustic waves from the umbrae, with drifts reflecting density attenuation along loops.

What carries the argument

slow magnetoacoustic waves originating from sunspot umbrae that modulate plasma emission in coronal loops

If this is right

Type-I burst chains can be explained by wave modulation rather than intrinsic burst properties alone.
The frequency range of 210-280 MHz corresponds to plasma densities at loop tops and footpoints.
Emerging magnetic flux correlates with the occurrence of these modulated bursts.
Simultaneous multi-instrument observations can trace wave propagation from photosphere to corona.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If this mechanism holds, radio observations could serve as a remote sensing tool for detecting slow waves in active regions.
The scenario might extend to other types of solar radio bursts if similar periodicities are found in additional events.
Higher resolution imaging of emission locations along loops could refine the density mapping from frequency drifts.

Load-bearing premise

The similar quasi-periods in radio bursts and sunspot umbrae indicate causal modulation by slow magnetoacoustic waves rather than mere coincidence, with emission frequencies directly determined by local plasma densities.

What would settle it

Detection of VLPs in radio bursts without corresponding periodic oscillations in the associated sunspot umbrae or coronal loops would falsify the modulation by slow magnetoacoustic waves.

read the original abstract

We traced the origin of very long-periodic pulsations (VLPs) in type-I burst chains on 2024 February 14. Seven successive and repetitive pulsation structures appeared in radio dynamic spectra in the metric waveband, which were simultaneously measured by CBSm, DART, and MUSER-L. A quasi-period at about 160$^{+11}_{-6}$ s, determined by the fast Fourier transform, was detected in the frequency range of about 210-280 MHz. Imaging observations from DART and SDO reveal that the type-I burst chains occur above two groups of sunspot umbrae connected by coronal loops. A quasi-period of approximately 170 s was also identified in the sunspot umbrae and coronal loops. The burst chains exhibit strong circular polarization and high brightness temperature, and they show spatiotemporal correlation with emerging magnetic flux. The number densities at the loop top and double footpoints can produce radio emission and generate type-I burst chains in the frequency range of 210-280 MHz. Our observations support the scenario that plasma emission serves as the primary generation mechanism of type-I bursts, with VLPs most likely being modulated by the slow magnetoacoustic waves originating from sunspot umbrae. The observed frequency drift of burst chains may reflect the density attenuation along coronal loops.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper adds a new multi-instrument dataset on VLPs in type-I bursts with period matches to sunspot oscillations, but the modulation claim rests on overlap without phase or statistical tests.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a set of 2024 February 14 observations that place type-I burst chains with ~160 s pulsations directly above sunspot umbrae and connecting coronal loops. Radio data from CBSm, DART, and MUSER-L show the chains in the 210-280 MHz band with strong circular polarization and high brightness temperature, while SDO imaging tracks the ~170 s oscillations in the umbrae and loops. The authors also note a frequency drift along the chains that they tie to density changes along the loops, and they calculate densities at the loop top and footpoints that sit in the right range for plasma emission at those frequencies. This gives a clean spatiotemporal correlation that was not reported before for this event. The work is straightforward in its use of FFT for periods and standard imaging to locate the sources. It strengthens the case for plasma emission as the main process in these bursts and supplies one more concrete example for coronal wave studies. The soft spot is the causal step. The claim that slow magnetoacoustic waves from the umbrae modulate the VLPs comes down to the periods being close within errors. There is no cross-spectral coherence check, no phase-locking evidence between the radio and EUV signals, and no test showing the match is unlikely to occur by chance given the range of solar oscillation periods. The density match is consistent with plasma emission but would be stronger if the derivation addressed possible magnetic cutoff or propagation effects. This is for solar radio and coronal seismology groups who follow type-I bursts. A reader looking for fresh observational constraints on wave modulation would get value from the timing and location data, though they would want the full methods for error bars and any additional statistics. Send it to peer review. The dataset is new and the correlations are worth referee scrutiny even if the interpretation needs tightening.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports multi-instrument observations of very long-periodic pulsations (VLPs) with a quasi-period of ~160 s in type-I solar radio burst chains at 210-280 MHz on 2024 February 14, detected via FFT in data from CBSm, DART, and MUSER-L. These are spatially correlated with ~170 s oscillations in sunspot umbrae and connecting coronal loops seen in SDO EUV imaging, with the bursts showing strong circular polarization, high brightness temperature, and association with emerging flux. The authors interpret the VLPs as modulated by slow magnetoacoustic waves from the umbrae, with plasma emission as the generation mechanism and frequency drifts reflecting density attenuation along loops.

Significance. If the causal modulation link holds, the work would provide valuable simultaneous radio and EUV constraints on type-I burst origins, supporting plasma emission models and illustrating how VLPs can serve as tracers for coronal wave dynamics and density structure. The multi-instrument imaging correlation is a positive aspect that could enable future coronal seismology applications.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and Results] Abstract and period-analysis section: The FFT-derived quasi-period of 160^{+11}_{-6} s is presented without details on the underlying time series (duration, cadence, detrending), frequency resolution, or statistical significance testing against red noise or via Monte Carlo methods. This is load-bearing because the central claim of modulation by ~170 s umbral waves depends on demonstrating that the radio period is a robust detection rather than a chance alignment.
[Discussion] Discussion section on modulation mechanism: The assertion that VLPs are 'most likely being modulated by the slow magnetoacoustic waves originating from sunspot umbrae' relies on period overlap (160 s vs ~170 s) but reports no cross-spectral coherence, phase-locking analysis, or null-hypothesis test (e.g., Monte Carlo sampling of solar oscillation periods). This directly undermines the causal interpretation over coincidence.
[Discussion] Density and emission mechanism section: The statement that 'the number densities at the loop top and double footpoints can produce radio emission' in 210-280 MHz lacks explicit values, the derivation method (DEM inversion, hydrostatic model, or otherwise), the plasma-frequency formula applied, and any assessment of unaccounted factors such as magnetic cutoff frequencies or scattering. This is central to ruling out alternative mechanisms.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'strong circular polarization' without quantitative degrees or comparison to theoretical expectations for plasma emission; adding these values would aid interpretation.
[Observations] Instrument roles (CBSm, DART, MUSER-L) and exact frequency coverage are mentioned but could be clarified with a brief table or sentence for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important areas where additional rigor and clarity will strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and period-analysis section: The FFT-derived quasi-period of 160^{+11}_{-6} s is presented without details on the underlying time series (duration, cadence, detrending), frequency resolution, or statistical significance testing against red noise or via Monte Carlo methods. This is load-bearing because the central claim of modulation by ~170 s umbral waves depends on demonstrating that the radio period is a robust detection rather than a chance alignment.

Authors: We agree that additional methodological details are required to demonstrate the robustness of the detected quasi-period. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the relevant sections to specify the exact duration and cadence of the radio time series from CBSm, DART, and MUSER-L, describe the detrending procedure applied before the FFT, state the frequency resolution, and report the results of statistical significance testing (including comparison against red-noise models or Monte Carlo simulations) to establish that the ~160 s signal exceeds the 95% confidence threshold. These additions will directly address the concern about chance alignment. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section on modulation mechanism: The assertion that VLPs are 'most likely being modulated by the slow magnetoacoustic waves originating from sunspot umbrae' relies on period overlap (160 s vs ~170 s) but reports no cross-spectral coherence, phase-locking analysis, or null-hypothesis test (e.g., Monte Carlo sampling of solar oscillation periods). This directly undermines the causal interpretation over coincidence.

Authors: We acknowledge that a purely statistical test such as cross-spectral coherence would provide stronger evidence for causality. The current interpretation rests on the combination of the close period match, the direct spatiotemporal correlation seen in the DART and SDO imaging between the radio sources and the oscillating umbrae/loops, and the known physics of slow magnetoacoustic waves in sunspot umbrae. Cross-spectral analysis is constrained by the limited duration of the simultaneous multi-instrument coverage. In the revision we will expand the discussion to quantify the spatial overlap, include a basic phase comparison where feasible, and address the probability of coincidental alignment given the prevalence of ~3-minute oscillations in active regions. We believe the multi-wavelength imaging evidence still favors the modulation scenario. revision: partial
Referee: [Discussion] Density and emission mechanism section: The statement that 'the number densities at the loop top and double footpoints can produce radio emission' in 210-280 MHz lacks explicit values, the derivation method (DEM inversion, hydrostatic model, or otherwise), the plasma-frequency formula applied, and any assessment of unaccounted factors such as magnetic cutoff frequencies or scattering. This is central to ruling out alternative mechanisms.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative support is needed. In the revised manuscript we will add the derived electron number densities at the loop top and footpoints obtained from SDO/AIA EUV data via differential emission measure (DEM) inversion, state the plasma-frequency relation used (f_p ≈ 9 √n_e kHz with n_e in cm^{-3}), demonstrate that these densities yield plasma frequencies matching the observed 210-280 MHz band, and briefly discuss why magnetic cutoff and scattering effects do not change the primary conclusion favoring plasma emission. This will strengthen the argument against alternative generation mechanisms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational period matching and density estimates

full rationale

The paper reports direct FFT measurements of ~160 s quasi-periods in 210-280 MHz radio spectra from CBSm/DART/MUSER-L and ~170 s periods in SDO sunspot umbrae and loops, plus standard density calculations that fall within the observed frequency range. No equations fit parameters to the target claim and then rename the fit as a prediction; no self-citations supply load-bearing uniqueness theorems; conclusions are interpretive inferences from spatiotemporal correlations rather than derivations that reduce to the inputs by construction. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established domain knowledge in solar radio astronomy and coronal seismology without new free parameters or postulated entities; the work is observational rather than theoretical.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Type-I solar radio bursts are generated primarily by the plasma emission mechanism
Invoked to interpret high brightness temperature, strong circular polarization, and frequency range matching calculated densities.
domain assumption Quasi-periodic pulsations in radio bursts can be modulated by slow magnetoacoustic waves propagating in coronal loops
Used to connect the observed radio periods to the independent oscillations detected in sunspot umbrae and loops.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1453 out tokens · 61188 ms · 2026-05-10T04:39:05.951905+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4

Ashfield, W., Polito, V., L \"o rin c \' k, J., et al.\ 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 54. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02706-4 2026
[2]

& Kontar, E

Azzollini, F. & Kontar, E. P.\ 2025, , 989, 1, 118. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adee22

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adee22 2025
[3]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039510

Cattell, C., Glesener, L., Leiran, B., et al.\ 2021, , 650, A6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039510

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039510 2021
[4]

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3de7

Chang, S., Wang, B., Lu, G., et al.\ 2024, , 272, 1, 21. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3de7

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3de7 2024
[5]

Cheung, M. C. M., Boerner, P., Schrijver, C. J., et al.\ 2015, , 807, 2, 143. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/143

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/143 2015
[6]

, keywords =

Collier, H., Hayes, L. A., Yu, S., et al.\ 2024, , 684, A215. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348652

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348652 2024
[7]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015231

Del Zanna, G., Aulanier, G., Klein, K.-L., et al.\ 2011, , 526, A137. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015231

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015231 2011
[8]

& Tomczak, M.\ 2010, , 261, 2, 233

Jakimiec, J. & Tomczak, M.\ 2010, , 261, 2, 233. doi:10.1007/s11207-009-9489-4

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-009-9489-4 2010
[9]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/167

Iwai, K., Miyoshi, Y., Masuda, S., et al.\ 2012, , 744, 2, 167. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/167

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/167 2012
[10]

doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02505-0

Karlick \'y , M.\ 2025, , 300, 7, 92. doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02505-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02505-0 2025
[11]

doi:10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z

Karlick \'y , M, Sych, R., Zemanova, A.,\ 2026, , 301, 3, 39. doi:10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-026-02635-z 2026
[12]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc116

Kim, S., Lee, J., Park, S.-H., et al.\ 2025, , 984, 1, 39. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc116

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc116 2025
[13]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937144

Kohutova, P., Verwichte, E., & Froment, C.\ 2020, , 633, L6. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937144

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937144 2020
[14]

E., Mugundhan, V., et al.\ 2025, , 700, A274

Kumari, A., Morosan, D. E., Mugundhan, V., et al.\ 2025, , 700, A274. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450402

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450402 2025
[15]

R., Title, A

Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al.\ 2012, , 275, 17. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8 2012
[16]

Y., Chen, Y., Wang, B., et al.\ 2017, , 292, 6, 82

Li, C. Y., Chen, Y., Wang, B., et al.\ 2017, , 292, 6, 82. doi:10.1007/s11207-017-1108-1

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-017-1108-1 2017
[17]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038433

Li, D., Yuan, D., Goossens, M., et al.\ 2020, , 639, A114. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038433

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038433 2020
[18]

& Chen, W.\ 2022, , 931, 2, L28

Li, D. & Chen, W.\ 2022, , 931, 2, L28. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6fd2

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6fd2 2022
[19]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142884

Li, D.\ 2022, , 662, A7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142884

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142884 2022
[20]

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6cde

Li, D., Wang, J., & Huang, Y.\ 2024, , 972, 1, L2. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6cde

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6cde 2024
[21]

doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf066

Li, D.\ 2025, , 542, 1, L48. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf066

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf066 2025
[22]

doi:10.1029/2025JA033772

Li, D., Yuan, D., Yan, J., et al.\ 2025a, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 130, 4, e2025JA033772. doi:10.1029/2025JA033772

work page doi:10.1029/2025ja033772
[23]

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae14ff

Li, D., Li, J., & Ji, H.\ 2025b, , 281, 2, 46. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae14ff

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae14ff
[24]

doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02761-x

Li, D.\ 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 13. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02761-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02761-x 2026
[25]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a53

Li, S., Zhang, Q., Ji, H., et al.\ 2025c, , 993, 1, 99. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a53

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a53
[26]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554587

Lim, D., Van Doorsselaere, T., Berghmans, D., et al.\ 2025, , 698, A65. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554587

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554587 2025
[27]

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac42c6

Lu, L., Feng, L., Warmuth, A., et al.\ 2022a, , 924, 1, L7. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac42c6

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac42c6 2041
[28]

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6ced

Lu, L., Feng, L., & Gan, W.\ 2022b, , 931, 1, L8. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6ced

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6ced 2041
[29]

I., Cairns, I

McCauley, P. I., Cairns, I. H., White, S. M., et al.\ 2019, , 294, 8, 106. doi:10.1007/s11207-019-1502-y

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-019-1502-y 2019
[30]

B.\ 1980, , 67, 2, 357

Melrose, D. B.\ 1980, , 67, 2, 357. doi:10.1007/BF00149813

work page doi:10.1007/bf00149813 1980
[31]

doi:10.1007/BF00157259

Mercier, C., Elgaroy, O., Tlamicha, A., et al.\ 1984, , 92, 1-2, 375. doi:10.1007/BF00157259

work page doi:10.1007/bf00157259 1984
[32]

L., Zhong, S., Kolotkov, D

Meadowcroft, R. L., Zhong, S., Kolotkov, D. Y., et al.\ 2024, , 527, 3, 5302. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3506

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3506 2024
[33]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c2

Mondal, S., Kansabanik, D., Oberoi, D., et al.\ 2024, , 975, 1, 122. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c2

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c2 2024
[34]

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaaf64

Mugundhan, V., Ramesh, R., Kathiravan, C., et al.\ 2018, , 855, 1, L8. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaaf64

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaaf64 2018
[35]

M., Anfinogentov, S., Storozhenko, A

Nakariakov, V. M., Anfinogentov, S., Storozhenko, A. A., et al.\ 2018, , 859, 2, 154. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfb9

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfb9 2018
[36]

M., Kosak, M

Nakariakov, V. M., Kosak, M. K., Kolotkov, D. Y., et al.\ 2019, , 874, 1, L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c9f

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c9f 2019
[37]

Nakariakov, V. M. & Kolotkov, D. Y.\ 2020, , 58, 441. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032320-042940

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032320-042940 2020
[38]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/126

Nishizuka, N., Karlick \'y , M., Janvier, M., et al.\ 2015, , 799, 2, 126. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/126

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/126 2015
[39]

, keywords =

Purkhart, S., Collier, H., Hayes, L. A., et al.\ 2025, , 698, A318. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554475

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554475 2025
[40]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4270

Reale, F., Testa, P., Petralia, A., et al.\ 2019, , 884, 2, 131. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4270

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4270 2019
[41]

H., Bush, R

Schou, J., Scherrer, P. H., Bush, R. I., et al.\ 2012, , 275, 1-2, 229. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2 2012
[42]

Schiavo, L. A. C. A., Botha, G. J. J., & McLaughlin, J. A.\ 2025, , arXiv:2509.19603. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.19603

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19603 2025
[43]

doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02272-4

Shi, F., Li, D., Ning, Z., et al.\ 2024, , 299, 3, 30. doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02272-4

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02272-4 2024
[44]

S., Benz, A

Spicer, D. S., Benz, A. O., & Huba, J. D.\ 1982, , 105, 2, 221

1982
[45]

doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc4e9

Song, D.-C., Dominique, M., Zimovets, I., et al.\ 2025, , 983, 2, L41. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc4e9

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc4e9 2025
[46]

doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02392-x

Su, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, W., et al.\ 2024, , 299, 10, 153. doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02392-x

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-024-02392-x 2024
[47]

M., Hannah, I

Su, Y., Veronig, A. M., Hannah, I. G., et al.\ 2018, , 856, 1, L17. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab436

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab436 2018
[48]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa774a

Suresh, A., Sharma, R., Oberoi, D., et al.\ 2017, , 843, 1, 19. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa774a

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa774a 2017
[49]

Sych, R. A. & Nakariakov, V. M.\ 2008, , 248, 2, 395. doi:10.1007/s11207-007-9005-7

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-007-9005-7 2008
[50]

doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9235-3

Tan, B.\ 2008, , 253, 1-2, 117. doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9235-3

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9235-3 2008
[51]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/25

Tan, B., Zhang, Y., Tan, C., et al.\ 2010, , 723, 1, 25. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/25

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/723/1/25 2010
[52]

, keywords =

Tian, H., McIntosh, S. W., Wang, T., et al.\ 2012, , 759, 2, 144. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/2/144

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/144 2012
[53]

R., Reeves, K

Tian, H., Young, P. R., Reeves, K. K., et al.\ 2016, , 823, 1, L16. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L16

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/l16 2016
[54]

doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00811-0

Wang, T., Ofman, L., Yuan, D., et al.\ 2021, , 217, 2, 34. doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00811-0

work page doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00811-0 2021
[55]

P., Smerd, S

Wild, J. P., Smerd, S. F., & Weiss, A. A.\ 1963, , 1, 291. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.01.090163.001451

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.01.090163.001451 1963
[56]

Solar radio bursts and Space Weather

White, S. M.\ 2024, , arXiv:2405.00959. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.00959

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.00959 2024
[57]

doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01932-y

Yan, J., Wu, J., Wu, L., et al.\ 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 750. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01932-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01932-y 2023
[58]

Yan, Y.\ 2024, 45th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 45, 2867

2024
[59]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add143

Yang, Y., Ning, Z., Song, Y., et al.\ 2025, , 985, 2, 257. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add143

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add143 2025
[60]

& Chen, B.\ 2019, , 872, 71

Yu, S. & Chen, B.\ 2019, , 872, 71

2019
[61]

doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/98

Yuan, D., Van Doorsselaere, T., Banerjee, D., et al.\ 2015, , 807, 1, 98. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/98

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/98 2015
[62]

doi:10.26464/epp2023019

Zhang, K.\ 2023, Earth and Planetary Physics, 7, 1, 4. doi:10.26464/epp2023019

work page doi:10.26464/epp2023019 2023
[63]

, keywords =

Zimovets, I. V., McLaughlin, J. A., Srivastava, A. K., et al.\ 2021, , 217, 5, 66. doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00840-9

work page doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00840-9 2021
[64]

Cosmic Research , keywords =

Zimovets, I. V., Nizamov, B. A., Sharykin, I. N., et al.\ 2025, Cosmic Research, 63, 5, 476. doi:10.1134/S0010952525601343

work page doi:10.1134/s0010952525601343 2025
[65]

doi:10.1007/BF00158438

Zwaan, C.\ 1985, , 100, 397. doi:10.1007/BF00158438

work page doi:10.1007/bf00158438 1985