arxiv: 2604.17786 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🧬 q-bio.CB

Recognition: unknown

Spatial dynamic modelling to understand how dendritic cell clustering affects T cell activation

Domenic P.J. Germano, Federico Frascoli, Peter P. Lee, Peter S. Kim, Robyn P. Araujo

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 03:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.CB

keywords dendritic cell clusteringT cell activationlymph nodespatial modelingagent-based modelstimulation distributionimmune responsephenotypically structured PDE

0 comments

The pith

T cells with intermediate stimulation uptake gain most from dendritic cell clustering in lymph nodes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a spatial model of T cells interacting with dendritic cells to explain how clustering of dendritic cells in lymph nodes shapes T cell activation. Clinical observations connect higher clustering in tumor-draining lymph nodes to better survival in breast cancer, pointing to a spatial mechanism that boosts immune responses. The authors start with a probabilistic agent-based model of T cell motion and activation, convert it to a deterministic phenotypically structured partial differential equation, and extract analytic approximations for the distribution of T cell stimulation levels under different clustering patterns. These approximations show that T cells taking up stimulation at an intermediate rate reach comparable or higher activation numbers and greater variety in stimulation levels when dendritic cells are clustered rather than dispersed. Sensitivity analysis on the same models further flags T cell traits that support fast activation or diverse activation outcomes.

Core claim

The central claim is that T cells with an intermediate level of stimulation uptake benefit most from higher levels of dendritic cell clustering. These cells activate with a comparable or greater abundance and greater heterogeneity in their stimulation distribution, compared with T cells of similar characteristics exposed to lower levels of dendritic cell clustering. The approximations derived from the phenotypically structured PDE also allow identification of T cell characteristics that produce rapid activation and robust heterogeneous activation.

What carries the argument

Analytic approximations of the expected T cell stimulation distribution, derived from the topology and level of dendritic cell clustering via a phenotypically structured partial differential equation obtained from a probabilistic agent-based model.

If this is right

Dendritic cell spatial organization in lymph nodes can selectively enhance T cell activation for cells with intermediate stimulation uptake.
Clustered dendritic cells produce greater heterogeneity in T cell stimulation levels for the intermediate-uptake population.
T cell traits identified by sensitivity analysis control rapid activation and heterogeneous activation even without changes in clustering.
The overall strength and diversity of immune responses depend on the spatial arrangement of dendritic cells.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The intermediate-uptake benefit may explain differences in immune effectiveness across lymph nodes with varying architectures in cancer or infection.
Interventions that promote dendritic cell clustering could be tested to improve anti-tumor T cell responses in patients whose T cells show suboptimal uptake rates.
The analytic approximations could be applied to predict activation patterns in other spatially structured immune settings such as infected tissues.
Controlled experiments measuring T cell stimulation uptake in clustered versus dispersed dendritic cell setups would directly test the predicted advantage.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic approximations derived from the phenotypically structured PDE accurately capture the stochastic spatial dynamics of the underlying agent-based model for arbitrary dendritic cell clustering topologies without material loss of accuracy.

What would settle it

Agent-based model simulations with high versus low dendritic cell clustering that show no increase in activation abundance or heterogeneity for intermediate-uptake T cells relative to low-uptake T cells.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17786 by Domenic P.J. Germano, Federico Frascoli, Peter P. Lee, Peter S. Kim, Robyn P. Araujo.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: An illustration of circulating dendritic cells (DCs) collecting antigen specific to the unhealthy cells, and being transported to the lymph node, via the lymphatic system. Within the lymph node, the circulating DCs interact with the resident DCs, and also na¨ıve T cells. Na¨ıve T cells then become activated towards a particular antigen, becoming either CD4+ helper T cells or CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to then … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Three examples of Dendritic cell (DC) clustering with fixed DC density (128 DCs), in a tissue of size 150 × 150 T cell diameters. 2a is an example with mean clusters sizes of Km = 16, resulting in DC 8 clusters, 2b is an example with mean clusters sizes of Km = 8, resulting in DC 16 clusters, and 2c is an example with mean clusters sizes of Km = 2, resulting in 64 DC clusters. 2.2 T cell motion and activat… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Discrete model illustration, depicting allowable T cell movements. The purple T cell (i) is only permitted to move up or right, due to the boundary imposed by the green plus-shaped dendritic cell. The yellow T cell (j) is permitted to move in each of the four directions. Furthermore, T cells close to DCs (those in the grey region, such as the purple T cell) can accumulate stimulation from the DCs. T cells … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: 4a An example of a T cell biased random walk with 7 DCs in one cluster, with colour indicating the stimulation level. Dark purple is high stimulation, bright yellow is no stimulation. 4b T cell stimulation level with time. 2.4 Continuum Model Here, we describe the phenotype-structured partial differential equation (PS-PDE) model. A detailed derivation is provided in the Supplementary Information, SI 1. In … view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Schematic for the simple 1D tissue topology. T cells move up the gradient, C, (dashed green line), and become activated where 1A = 1 (solid yellow line). We fix the diffusivity D = 0.5, chemotactic sensitivity χ = 0.25, the stimulation uptake rate µ+ = 0.45, and the stimulation degradation rate µ− = 0.60. For the remainder of this section, we depict results from the discrete model by solid purple lines, re… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Case 1: skewed high T cell stimulation (top row), Case 2: balanced T cell stimulation (middle row), and Case 3: skewed low T cell stimulation (bottom row), for the ABM (purple), PS-PDE (yellow dashed) and analytic approximation (blue dotted) models. Left column shows the T cell density, with a large activation region (grey). Middle-left column shows the phenotype distribution in phenotype space (a), and ho… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Case 4: Activation dominant (top row), Case 5: coexistence (middle row), and Case 6: na¨ıve dominant (bottom row), for the ABM (purple), PS-PDE (yellow dashed) and analytic approximation (blue dotted) models. Left column shows the T cell density, with a large activation region (grey). Middle-left column shows the phenotype distribution in phenotype space (a), and how it changes in time. Middleright column… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Comparison between PS-PDE model (dashed) and ABM (solid) for a single dendritic cell activation site. Left column shows the T cell density with T cell density contours of u1 = 1 × 10−3 (dashed) and u2 = 5 × 10−4 (dotted). Middle left column shows the stimulation distribution for the PS-PDE model (dashed black) and the ABM (solid coloured from yellow/light to purple/dark to indicate time), with time. Middl… view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Comparison in proportion of T cell activation between PS-PDE (dashed black), ABM (dashed coloured), and the approximation (dotted blue), for fixed values of Amax = 20 (top row), Amax = 20 (middle row), and Amax = 100 (bottom row), at times t = 100 (first column), t = 500 (second column), t = 1000 (third column), and t = 5000 (fourth column). We see that all results match the approximation at the final time… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Sensitivity analysis on the spatial clustering of DCs, for various T cell characteristics. Top row shows the mean proportion of T cell activation over 10 unique Dendritic cell topologies after 48 hours, comparing results from the ABM (solid line) and the analytic approximation (dashed line). Bottom row shows the mean number of DCs required for T cells to become activated (solid line) with the 95% confiden… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Sensitivity of the proportion of activated T cells to spatial clustering of DCs. Solid, coloured lines show results from the the ABM, and the dashed black line shows the analytic approximation. Times shown are 7 hours (yellow/light), 14, 21, 27, 34, 41, and 48 hours (purple/dark). T cell characteristics vary by plot, with left (top) column (row) being low rate of stimulation uptake (decay), middle column … view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Sensitivity of the heterogeneity of T cell activation to spatial clustering of DCs, after 48 hours. Distributions shown for each T cell characteristic are for various Dendritic cell cluster size from low clustering (yellow, 1 DC per cluster), to high clustering (purple, 128 DCs per cluster). T cell characteristics vary by plot, with left (top) column (row) being low rate of stimulation uptake (decay), mid… view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Examples of skewed high T cell activation (top row), mid level T cell activation (middle row) and skewed low T cell activation (bottom row). Left column show the contour plots of T cell density for PS-PDE model (black) and ABM (coloured from yellow/light to purple/dark to indicate time), with T cell density contours of u1 = 10−3 (dashed) and u2 = 5 × 10−4 (dotted). Middle left column show the Stimulation … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The coordination of the immune system and its components is essential for the body to maintain a healthy status. Recent clinical studies show that breast cancer patients with high Dendritic cell clustering in tumour draining lymph nodes have improved survival outcomes, compared to those with a lower degree of clustering. These results suggest that a specific form of Dendritic cell clustering promotes T cell activation. However, the mechanistic effects of this spatial organisation is unclear. We develop a spatially dynamic model of T cells interacting with Dendritic cells within the lymph node. We present a novel probabilistic agent-based model (ABM) of T cells, and use it to derive the deterministic, phenotypically structured partial differential equation (PS-PDE) of T cell activation and motion. Using the PS-PDE, we derive analytic approximations of the expected T cell stimulation distribution, based on the topology and level of clustering of a given Dendritic cell population. Our analytic approximation enables us to identify T cell characteristics that benefit most from Dendritic cell clustering, to result in an enhanced stimulation distribution. We also perform a sensitivity analysis with our models to identify T cell characteristics that result in desirable T cell activation characteristics, such as rapid T cell activation, and robust heterogeneous T cell activation. Our key findings show that T cells with an intermediate level of stimulation uptake benefit most from higher levels of Dendritic cell clustering, activating with a comparable or greater abundance, and greater heterogeneity, when compared to T cells of a similar characteristic but with a lower level of Dendritic cell clustering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives analytic approximations for T cell stimulation distributions from a phenotypically structured PDE obtained from an ABM, identifying intermediate-uptake T cells as benefiting most from DC clustering, but the approximations' accuracy under stochastic clustering remains unverified.

read the letter

This paper's main advance is deriving analytic approximations for the expected T cell stimulation distribution directly from the topology of dendritic cell clustering, after moving from a probabilistic agent-based model to a phenotypically structured PDE. That lets them conclude that T cells with intermediate stimulation uptake show comparable or greater abundance and more heterogeneity under high clustering than under low clustering. The modeling pipeline is done carefully: they start with an explicit stochastic ABM, take the deterministic continuum limit to the PS-PDE, and then extract closed-form expressions that depend on clustering level and arrangement. The sensitivity analysis identifying parameters for rapid and robust heterogeneous activation is a practical addition. It is good that they ground the work in the clinical observation of better survival with DC clustering in breast cancer. The soft spot is the fidelity of the analytic approximations to the original stochastic spatial dynamics. Because the PDE is deterministic, it averages away local fluctuations and discrete encounter noise, which clustering would make more important. Without side-by-side comparisons of the ABM histograms and the analytic predictions specifically for clustered DC configurations, it is not clear whether the intermediate-uptake regime remains optimal or whether the heterogeneity prediction holds in the tails. The abstract gives no sign that such validation was performed. This is for readers in mathematical immunology who work with spatial or multi-scale models and want to explain why DC clustering correlates with better outcomes. Someone looking for a ready-to-use approximation formula would find it here. I would send it for peer review because the question is clear, the methods are transparent, and the potential mechanistic insight is worth checking even if the approximations require more testing against the ABM.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a probabilistic agent-based model (ABM) of T-cell interactions with dendritic cells (DCs) in lymph nodes, derives a deterministic phenotypically structured PDE (PS-PDE) as its continuum limit, and obtains closed-form analytic approximations for the expected T-cell stimulation distribution as a function of DC clustering topology and level. The central claim is that T cells with an intermediate stimulation-uptake rate activate with comparable or greater abundance and greater heterogeneity under high DC clustering than under low clustering.

Significance. If the analytic approximations remain faithful to the underlying stochastic spatial dynamics, the work supplies a mechanistic account of why elevated DC clustering in tumor-draining lymph nodes correlates with improved clinical outcomes and identifies a specific T-cell phenotype that is preferentially advantaged by that spatial organization. The modeling pipeline (ABM → PS-PDE → analytic approximation) also offers a computationally inexpensive route to explore how lymph-node architecture modulates immune activation.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (analytic approximation derivation): the closed-form expressions for the stimulation distribution are obtained from the deterministic PS-PDE under a mean-field closure that discards local density fluctuations and discrete encounter stochasticity; no quantitative error bounds or direct comparison to ABM histograms are supplied for the high-clustering topologies that are central to the clinical motivation.
[Results] Results, stimulation-distribution figures: the identification of the 'intermediate' uptake regime as optimal rests entirely on the analytic approximations; without side-by-side ABM validation for the same clustering parameters, it is unclear whether the reported gains in abundance and heterogeneity survive the stochastic spatial correlations that the PS-PDE limit is expected to suppress.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the stimulation-uptake parameter is introduced without an explicit symbol table; readers must infer its meaning from the surrounding text.
Figure captions for the clustering topologies do not state the precise values of the clustering parameter used in the analytic versus ABM panels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. The comments highlight important aspects of validation for the analytic approximations, which we address point by point below. We agree that additional direct comparisons will strengthen the manuscript and plan to incorporate them in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (analytic approximation derivation): the closed-form expressions for the stimulation distribution are obtained from the deterministic PS-PDE under a mean-field closure that discards local density fluctuations and discrete encounter stochasticity; no quantitative error bounds or direct comparison to ABM histograms are supplied for the high-clustering topologies that are central to the clinical motivation.

Authors: We acknowledge that the closed-form expressions rely on the mean-field PS-PDE limit. Although the PS-PDE is rigorously derived as the continuum limit of the ABM, we agree that quantitative validation against the stochastic ABM is needed for high-clustering cases. In the revised manuscript we will add direct comparisons of analytic stimulation distributions to ABM histograms for representative high-clustering topologies, including quantitative error measures such as total variation distance and Kullback-Leibler divergence between the two. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results, stimulation-distribution figures: the identification of the 'intermediate' uptake regime as optimal rests entirely on the analytic approximations; without side-by-side ABM validation for the same clustering parameters, it is unclear whether the reported gains in abundance and heterogeneity survive the stochastic spatial correlations that the PS-PDE limit is expected to suppress.

Authors: The referee is correct that the identification of the intermediate-uptake regime as optimal is currently supported only by the analytic results. To confirm that the reported advantages in activation abundance and heterogeneity persist under stochastic spatial correlations, we will include side-by-side ABM versus analytic comparisons in the Results section for both low- and high-clustering regimes, with explicit focus on the intermediate-uptake parameter range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from explicit ABM to PS-PDE to analytic approximations without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper constructs a probabilistic ABM, derives the deterministic PS-PDE as its continuum limit, and then obtains closed-form analytic approximations for the expected stimulation distribution from the PS-PDE. These steps are presented as successive mathematical reductions rather than parameter fits, self-definitions, or renamings of inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear in the abstract or described chain. The central claim—that intermediate-uptake T cells benefit most from clustering—arises from comparing the derived expressions across different DC topologies, not from any quantity being defined in terms of its own output. The skeptic concern about approximation fidelity is a question of accuracy, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The approach implicitly relies on standard assumptions of probabilistic cell interactions and deterministic continuum limits, but none are listed explicitly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1131 out tokens · 49035 ms · 2026-05-10T03:46:40.823914+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[1]

A hybrid discrete– continuum modelling approach to explore the impact of T-cell infiltration on anti-tumour im- mune response

Luis Almeida, Chloe Audebert, Emma Leschiera, and Tommaso Lorenzi. “A hybrid discrete– continuum modelling approach to explore the impact of T-cell infiltration on anti-tumour im- mune response”. In:Bulletin of Mathematical Biology84.12 (2022), p. 141

2022
[2]

Role of T cell-to-dendritic cell chemoattraction in T cell priming initiation in the lymph node: An agent-based modeling study

Ivan Azarov, Kirill Peskov, Gabriel Helmlinger, and Yuri Kosinsky. “Role of T cell-to-dendritic cell chemoattraction in T cell priming initiation in the lymph node: An agent-based modeling study”. In:Frontiers in immunology10 (2019), p. 1289

2019
[3]

Heterogeneous CD8+ T cell migration in the lymph node in the absence of inflamma- tion revealed by quantitative migration analysis

Edward J Banigan, Tajie H Harris, David A Christian, Christopher A Hunter, and Andrea J Liu. “Heterogeneous CD8+ T cell migration in the lymph node in the absence of inflamma- tion revealed by quantitative migration analysis”. In:PLoS computational biology11.2 (2015), e1004058

2015
[4]

Lymph node topology dictates T cell migration behavior

Joost B Beltman, Athanasius FM Mar´ ee, Jennifer N Lynch, Mark J Miller, and Rob J De Boer. “Lymph node topology dictates T cell migration behavior”. In:The Journal of experimental medicine204.4 (2007), pp. 771–780

2007
[5]

Cutting edge: cognate CD4 help pro- motes recruitment of antigen-specific CD8 T cells around dendritic cells

H´ elene Beuneu, Zacarias Garcia, and Philippe Bousso. “Cutting edge: cognate CD4 help pro- motes recruitment of antigen-specific CD8 T cells around dendritic cells”. In:The Journal of Immunology177.3 (2006), pp. 1406–1410

2006
[6]

On-lattice simulation of T cell motility, chemotaxis, and traf- ficking in the lymph node paracortex

Gib Bogle and P Rod Dunbar. “On-lattice simulation of T cell motility, chemotaxis, and traf- ficking in the lymph node paracortex”. In: (2012)

2012
[7]

Generation, migration and function of circulating dendritic cells

Roberto Bonasio and Ulrich H von Andrian. “Generation, migration and function of circulating dendritic cells”. In:Current opinion in immunology18.4 (2006), pp. 503–511

2006
[8]

T-cell activation by dendritic cells in the lymph node: lessons from the movies

Philippe Bousso. “T-cell activation by dendritic cells in the lymph node: lessons from the movies”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology8.9 (2008), pp. 675–684

2008
[9]

Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes

Philippe Bousso and Ellen Robey. “Dynamics of CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cells in intact lymph nodes”. In:Nature immunology4.6 (2003), pp. 579–585

2003
[10]

T cell fate at the single-cell level

Veit R Buchholz, Ton NM Schumacher, and Dirk H Busch. “T cell fate at the single-cell level”. In:Annual review of immunology34.1 (2016), pp. 65–92

2016
[11]

Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8+ T cells to sites of CD4+ T cell–dendritic cell interaction

Flora Castellino, Alex Y Huang, Gr´ egoire Altan-Bonnet, Sabine Stoll, Clemens Scheinecker, and Ronald N Germain. “Chemokines enhance immunity by guiding naive CD8+ T cells to sites of CD4+ T cell–dendritic cell interaction”. In:Nature440.7086 (2006), pp. 890–895

2006
[12]

Mathematics in modern immunology

Mario Castro, Grant Lythe, Carmen Molina-Paris, and Ruy M Ribeiro. “Mathematics in modern immunology”. In:Interface focus6.2 (2016), p. 20150093

2016
[13]

How many dendritic cells are required to initiate a T-cell response?

Susanna Celli, Mark Day, Andreas J M¨ uller, Carmen Molina-Paris, Grant Lythe, and Philippe Bousso. “How many dendritic cells are required to initiate a T-cell response?” In:Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology120.19 (2012), pp. 3945–3948

2012
[14]

Spatial organization of dendritic cells within tumor draining lymph nodes impacts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients

Andrew Y. Chang, Nupur Bhattacharya, Jian Mu, A Francesca Setiadi, Valeria Carcamo- Cavazos, Gerald H. Lee, Diana L Simons, Sina Yadegarynia, Kaveh Hemati, Adam Kapelner, Zheng Ming, David N. Krag, Erich J. Schwartz, Danny Z. Chen, and Lee Peter P. “Spatial organization of dendritic cells within tumor draining lymph nodes impacts clinical outcome in breas...

work page doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-242 2013
[15]

Resident dendritic cell density in the lymph node paracortex is preDC-estined

Rafael S Czepielewski and Gwendalyn J Randolph. “Resident dendritic cell density in the lymph node paracortex is preDC-estined”. In:Immunity56.8 (2023), pp. 1699–1701

2023
[16]

Mathematical models for immunol- ogy: current state of the art and future research directions

Raluca Eftimie, Joseph J Gillard, and Doreen A Cantrell. “Mathematical models for immunol- ogy: current state of the art and future research directions”. In:Bulletin of mathematical biology 78.10 (2016), pp. 2091–2134. 22

2016
[17]

Real-time analysis of T cell receptors in naive cells in vitro and in vivo reveals flexibility in synapse and signaling dynamics

Rachel S Friedman, Peter Beemiller, Caitlin M Sorensen, Jordan Jacobelli, and Matthew F Krummel. “Real-time analysis of T cell receptors in naive cells in vitro and in vivo reveals flexibility in synapse and signaling dynamics”. In:Journal of Experimental Medicine207.12 (2010), pp. 2733–2749

2010
[18]

Harnessing the heterogeneity of T cell differentiation fate to fine-tune generation of effector and memory T cells

Chang Gong, Jennifer J Linderman, and Denise Kirschner. “Harnessing the heterogeneity of T cell differentiation fate to fine-tune generation of effector and memory T cells”. In:Frontiers in immunology5 (2014), p. 57

2014
[19]

Antigen Presentation and T Cell Stimulation by Dendritic Cells

Pierre Guermonprez, Jenny Valladeau, Laurence Zitvogel, Clotilde Th´ ery, and Sebastian Amigorena. “Antigen Presentation and T Cell Stimulation by Dendritic Cells”. In:Annual Review of Im- munology20.Volume 20, 2002 (2002), pp. 621–667.issn: 1545-3278.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064828

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064828 2002
[20]

Dendritic Cell Organization and Function in Innate and Adaptive Immune Defense Within Lymph Nodes

Jessica Y Huang and Michael Y Gerner. “Dendritic Cell Organization and Function in Innate and Adaptive Immune Defense Within Lymph Nodes”. In:Immunological reviews337.1 (2026), e70071

2026
[21]

Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system

Akiko Iwasaki and Ruslan Medzhitov. “Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system”. In:Nature immunology16.4 (2015), pp. 343–353

2015
[22]

Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system

Akiko Iwasaki and Ruslan Medzhitov. “Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system”. In:science327.5963 (2010), pp. 291–295

2010
[23]

Lymph node swelling combined with temporary effector T cell retention aids T cell response in a model of adaptive immunity

Sarah C Johnson, Jennifer Frattolin, Lowell T Edgar, Mohammad Jafarnejad, and James E Moore Jr. “Lymph node swelling combined with temporary effector T cell retention aids T cell response in a model of adaptive immunity”. In:Journal of the Royal Society Interface18.185 (2021), p. 20210464

2021
[24]

A brief review of the basics of immunology: the innate and adaptive response

Melissa A Kennedy. “A brief review of the basics of immunology: the innate and adaptive response”. In:Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice40.3 (2010), pp. 369–379

2010
[25]

T cell migration, search strate- gies and mechanisms

Matthew F Krummel, Frederic Bartumeus, and Audrey G´ erard. “T cell migration, search strate- gies and mechanisms”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology16.3 (2016), pp. 193–201

2016
[26]

Mature dendritic cells may promote high-avidity tuning of vaccine T cell resp onses

Adarsh Kumbhari, Colt A Egelston, Peter P Lee, and Peter S Kim. “Mature dendritic cells may promote high-avidity tuning of vaccine T cell resp onses”. In:Frontiers in Immunology11 (2020), p. 584680

2020
[27]

Phenotype structuring in collective cell migration: a tutorial of mathematical models and methods

Tommaso Lorenzi, Kevin J Painter, and Chiara Villa. “Phenotype structuring in collective cell migration: a tutorial of mathematical models and methods”. In:Journal of Mathematical Biology 90.6 (2025), p. 61

2025
[28]

T-cell priming by den- dritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases

Thorsten R Mempel, Sarah E Henrickson, and Ulrich H Von Andrian. “T-cell priming by den- dritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases”. In:Nature427.6970 (2004), pp. 154– 159

2004
[29]

A virtual lymph node model to dissect the requirements for T-cell activation by synapses and kinapses

H´ el` ene D Moreau, Gib Bogle, and Philippe Bousso. “A virtual lymph node model to dissect the requirements for T-cell activation by synapses and kinapses”. In:Immunology and cell biology 94.7 (2016), pp. 680–688

2016
[30]

A phenotype-structured mathematical model for the influence of hypoxia on oncolytic virotherapy

David Morselli, Giulia Chiari, Federico Frascoli, and Marcello E Delitala. “A phenotype-structured mathematical model for the influence of hypoxia on oncolytic virotherapy”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02413(2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

T cell migration in intact lymph nodes in vivo

Marcia A Munoz, Mate Biro, and Wolfgang Weninger. “T cell migration in intact lymph nodes in vivo”. In:Current opinion in cell biology30 (2014), pp. 17–24

2014
[32]

Topological small-world organization of the fibroblastic reticular cell network determines lymph node functionality

Mario Novkovic, Lucas Onder, Jovana Cupovic, Jun Abe, David Bomze, Viviana Cremasco, Elke Scandella, Jens V Stein, Gennady Bocharov, Shannon J Turley, et al. “Topological small-world organization of the fibroblastic reticular cell network determines lymph node functionality”. In: PLoS biology14.7 (2016), e1002515. 23

2016
[33]

CD8+ T cell differentiation and dysfunction in cancer

Mary Philip and Andrea Schietinger. “CD8+ T cell differentiation and dysfunction in cancer”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology22.4 (2022), pp. 209–223

2022
[34]

A guide to antigen processing and presentation

Novalia Pishesha, Thibault J Harmand, and Hidde L Ploegh. “A guide to antigen processing and presentation”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology22.12 (2022), pp. 751–764

2022
[35]

Dendritic cell migration through the lymphatic vasculature to lymph nodes

Andrew M Platt and Gwendalyn J Randolph. “Dendritic cell migration through the lymphatic vasculature to lymph nodes”. In:Advances in immunology120 (2013), pp. 51–68

2013
[36]

Dendritic-cell trafficking to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels

Gwendalyn J Randolph, Veronique Angeli, and Melody A Swartz. “Dendritic-cell trafficking to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology5.8 (2005), pp. 617– 628

2005
[37]

A comparison of random vs. chemotaxis-driven contacts of T cells with dendritic cells during repertoire scanning

Thomas Riggs, Adrienne Walts, Nicolas Perry, Laura Bickle, Jennifer N Lynch, Amy Myers, Joanne Flynn, Jennifer J Linderman, Mark J Miller, and Denise E Kirschner. “A comparison of random vs. chemotaxis-driven contacts of T cells with dendritic cells during repertoire scanning”. In:Journal of theoretical biology250.4 (2008), pp. 732–751

2008
[38]

Why must T cells be cross-reactive?

Andrew K Sewell. “Why must T cells be cross-reactive?” In:Nature Reviews Immunology12.9 (2012), pp. 669–677

2012
[39]

Homeostatic lym- phoid chemokines synergize with adhesion ligands to trigger T and B lymphocyte chemokinesis

Agnieszka N Stachowiak, Yana Wang, Yen-Chen Huang, and Darrell J Irvine. “Homeostatic lym- phoid chemokines synergize with adhesion ligands to trigger T and B lymphocyte chemokinesis”. In:The Journal of Immunology177.4 (2006), pp. 2340–2348

2006
[40]

T cell egress via lymphatic vessels is tuned by antigen encounter and limits tumor control

Maria M Steele, Abhinav Jaiswal, Ines Delclaux, Ian D Dryg, Dhaarini Murugan, Julia Femel, Sunny Son, Haley du Bois, Cameron Hill, Sancy A Leachman, et al. “T cell egress via lymphatic vessels is tuned by antigen encounter and limits tumor control”. In:Nature immunology24.4 (2023), pp. 664–675

2023
[41]

Tolerogenic dendritic cells

Ralph M Steinman, Daniel Hawiger, and Michel C Nussenzweig. “Tolerogenic dendritic cells”. In:Annual review of immunology21.1 (2003), pp. 685–711.issn: 1545-3278

2003
[42]

Random migration and signal integration promote rapid and robust T cell recruitment

Johannes Textor, Sarah E Henrickson, Judith N Mandl, Ulrich H Von Andrian, J¨ urgen Wester- mann, Rob J De Boer, and Joost B Beltman. “Random migration and signal integration promote rapid and robust T cell recruitment”. In:PLoS computational biology10.8 (2014), e1003752

2014
[43]

A brief outline of the immune system

Namrata Tomar and Rajat K De. “A brief outline of the immune system”. In:Immunoinfor- matics. Springer, 2014, pp. 3–12

2014
[44]

The serial engagement model 17 years after: from TCR triggering to im- munotherapy

Salvatore Valitutti. “The serial engagement model 17 years after: from TCR triggering to im- munotherapy”. In:Frontiers in immunology3 (2012), p. 272

2012
[45]

Chemo- tactic migration of T cells towards dendritic cells promotes the detection of rare antigens

Renske MA Vroomans, Athanasius FM Mar´ ee, Rob J De Boer, and Joost B Beltman. “Chemo- tactic migration of T cells towards dendritic cells promotes the detection of rare antigens”. In: PLOS Computational Biology8.11 (2012), e1002763

2012
[46]

A single autoimmune T cell receptor recognizes more than a million different peptides

Linda Wooldridge, Julia Ekeruche-Makinde, Hugo a Van Den Berg, Anna Skowera, John J Miles, Mai Ping Tan, Garry Dolton, Mathew Clement, Sian Llewellyn-Lacey, David A Price, et al. “A single autoimmune T cell receptor recognizes more than a million different peptides”. In:Journal of Biological Chemistry287.2 (2012), pp. 1168–1177

2012
[47]

Dendritic cell migration in health and disease

Tim Worbs, Swantje I Hammerschmidt, and Reinhold F¨ orster. “Dendritic cell migration in health and disease”. In:Nature Reviews Immunology17.1 (2017), pp. 30–48. 24 Supplementary Information: Spatial dynamic modelling to understand how dendritic cell clustering affects T cell activation Domenic P.J. Germano 1,3, Federico Frascoli 2, Robyn P. Araujo 3, Pet...

2017